It’s really nice on the wrist. Just a little bit thicker that you might expect. That put me off buying it. But I still have this nagging doubt that I might actually love it 😁
@highwaystar3780 wtf is the point of this comment? All watches by all companies are homage to one line or other. And it's a personal opinion of someone who DGAF what you think, get over yourself.
@DJHalfbarr My point being. I Don't get why Anyone would Call that Lame Omega(which Most Omegas Are frankly)Stunning?? Forget Homage,...What is So Stunning about that Generic case design ? If you Didn't know it was an Omega, you wouldn't spit on it ! Now I'm Over it !!
I've always been happy with 40 to 42 mm. Never been a fan of the cornflake hands much, but a sound-of-fog dial, a non-stick dial, and a cup of Swiss cheese... now you've got my attention 😂
The little Hamilton is my daily :) great watch! I forget it’s on my wrist and many people complement me on it - which is this case I like because it’s not because of brand recognition
All the GS SBGW 37.3mm case watches are absolutely killer, clean, and totally wearable! That cream dial (231, now 301) is classic, but I love my 287 burgundy dial! Also Nomos club campus 36 is an amazing wear at an amazing price too! But I'll always think the two kings are the DJ36 (fluted bezel, jubilee bracelet) and the explorer 36.
@f.kieranfinney457 the OP and the GS SBGW series are two vastly different watches. The only similarity is both are no dates with double battin markers at some of the cardinal indices. The GS SBGW is pure dress which the OP is the O.G. waterproof rugged sports watch.
Hello Tom,,, greetings from northern Sweden and a fellow watch enthusiast. These watches are all fantastic and you are making it it difficult to dicide... all the above to be honest.
Funny that this would be the main reason of my interest in buying it. I don't really care what people think, especially what people think they're sure to know. This would be a great conversation starter, not for everybody and surely enough, only a few watch nerds would interact with this model. Letting aside the fact that is a stunner of a watch projected in the realm of high horology.
Mate either too big or too small? I’ve got 8 1/2 wrists, please do a vid on larger 44-50mm watches. I really hate finding a watch that I like and find out it’s below 42mm which is the smallest I can wear without it looking like a bottle top. And can you explain why the speedmaster pro is listed as 42 mm when it’s actually 40. I’ve just bought one and not happy bunny.
17 cm wrist in my case and I think that 40mm is the maximum for me, though at the moment I’m wearing a 32mm meant for women and it doesn’t look excessively small.
Small wrist also. I've got from 36 to 42 mm watches and, IMHO, the key point is about lug to lug size. A 42 mm with small lugs could fit better than a 36 mm with long lugs.
@@user-ke6xt1yl1l agreed! And having long lugs is a waste of wrist space. It’s the dial space you want! So brands like Nomos and Muhle Glashütte are lovely but the long lugs ruin it.
Perfect timing! Just started the video and have been looking at 35mm PRXs, mainly the oddball digital one! I kinda like it in a retro-future sort of way. Never would pay for it full price but there's a significant discount on it where I'm at and I'm looking forward to getting it!
I miss the conversations that you had with Andrew, I felt that you had a very good chemestry in the screen, but you are doing a pretty good job by your self
The original Hamilton this new iteration is based on wasn’t just for the RAF. It was made available to 3 branches of the HM armed forces, the Army issue having the reference W10, the RAF with the 6BB & the Royal Navy having the reference 0552. The watch however, was the same across all references.
Totally love the Globemaster. If they made it 37mm and 11mm thick, it would be the one to save up for. However, having tried one on, it's very chunky and heavy unfortunately
The Longines is the way a luxury diver should look. Skin divers are so beautiful. And no one actually dives with the bigger (and precious metal) models like Rolex.
Patek and Omega haven’t worked out yet how to fit the other third to half of the world on their ‘worldtimer’ watches. Leaving out 3 or so billion people is not a good marketing move 😕
I bought this popular video watch from mamacoo , which was originally priced at a few thousand dollars, but now it's only $380! It's really suitable to pick up feces!
I’m perhaps the only viewer who doesn’t want a Powermatic 80 watch and would rather have the same watch with a +-10 second a year quartz movement. Tissot does that for some models, and the quartz version is cheaper.
Load of bollocks on Rolex AP. I’ve been waiting for one for four years!!!! I wanted one for my 65th birthday and retirement. I’m now approaching 67. Rolex AD’s are no more than rip-off merchants. I have a Tudor BB58 that I love and if I get the AP option I’ll tell them to shove it where the sun doesn’t shine
I own a two-tone 36 DJ, a new 36 Exp, a GS Skyflake, a Catier Santos, and a few more, including German and Swiss. Any 36 by Rolex is just perfect on my Asian 16.5 wrist, imo. Tbh, I don't think of Rolex the same way I did 05 years ago, but there has to be a reason why Rolex is Rolex. All they do is do things correctly.
Snobs hates quartz for the one tick second hand. While ultra snobs desire a one tick second hand on a mechanical watch. We just cant be satisfied i guess
@@ianp7557Really? He's not with Watchfinder anymore? Why? I know he has his own channel but still, he was great here and I have no doubt that he was well payed. Is there a video of him explaining why he left?
Lost me with the PRX. The sizing makes zero sense. It's an everyday watch without a dive bezel, which means it should range from 36mm to 38mm traditionally. You can either have it in 35mm which feels VERY small even on my small wrists, or in 40mm, which is a great size for a watch with a rotating bezel, but looks like a plate with a static bezel (unless you're an obese American). It's the epitome of a watch you actually can't wear because of the sizing.
They made it 35mm because the original Tissot Seastar that they modeled the PRX off of was 35mm. I have a 7 inch (17cm) wrist and own the smaller sized PRX. Fits me just fine. The integrated lugs make it wear larger than it is. To each their own though.
''You can either have it in 35mm which feels VERY small even on my small wrists''. When people mature in their watch collecting journey they begin to understand about proportion and history. It's not always about having something flashy with big wrist presence. It fits well my 6.5 inch wrist and I even have some tiny 30mm vintage watches. Men used to wear 30 to 35 all the time...
@@jacobavis9448 I regularly wear a 33.5mm Smith's Everest, a 34mm Grand Seiko...I understand the history. There is something about the 35mm PRX which does not translate well to the smaller size. I'm not sure if they directly scaled it down from the 40mm, or if they've done something with the taper on the bracelet. I was very excited to see them making it in 35mm, but as soon as I held it in the flesh I knew it hadn't worked. I love a smaller watch. If you haven't held one then you might not understand. If you have then maybe we just have different taste. For me, the 35mm misses the mark which is such a shame because it could've been awesome. And again, just my opinion but I think the 40mm is a ridiculous size for a sports watch without a chunky dive bezel.
@@MattSeesGray It's not so much the overall size, there is something which either changed or didn't translate when they scaled it down. It feels as though the taper is more aggressive, or some other angle or proportion has been changed from the original PRX design which makes it feel off to me. Each to their own indeed, and I'm glad you're enjoying your watch. I was very excited when it was launched but as soon as I held one I knew it wasn't for me.
meh, strongly disagree on that prx. that’s how sizing is not done right. big one looks wrong, small one looks wrong. if you need to produce an integrated sports model cause everyone does it… a meh result is what we get. people were blinded by „swiss automatic“ and wanted an ap so bad they bought this one. but at the end of the day this is an average watch with questionable sizing and a mechaplastical movement.
@@stupidocanerosa this is the watch for the average fellow. and selling tons means what, regarding quality..? you contradict yourself within 4 lines. no need to be sad now, you didn’t produce this.
@@call1a1rich I do contradict?? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 you are talking about sizing right? I answered Tissot knows which sizes to produce and sell and the demonstration is in the market success. So, where's the contradiction? Aah, quality... were you talking about quality or sizing?
@@stupidocanerosa look, that watch is not as good as people want it to be. that’s all Im saying. I understand owners trying to defend it, but sales numbers as an argument don’t mean anything regarding quality. take the moonswatch for example. sure companies know what is selling right now, but you are able to make up your own mind about it. and if millions love it, it still can be crap. enjoy ya day, gotta go
@@call1a1rich Have a nice day. Now, to whom will continue reading, I'm not an owner nor an enthusiast of the Tissot PRX. YOU started the conversation on the "bad sizing choices", I replied about the "sizing choices made by experts in the market giving them a reasonable feedback they chose right", YOU got offended replying with "quality bla bla", I explained why YOU misunderstood, YOU answered with more gibberish about quality... WE WERE TALKING ABOUT SIZES! Let's get this straight: what are talking about? Sizes or quality?
![ARGENTINA vs. CHILE [3-0] | RESUMEN | ELIMINATORIAS SUDAMERICANAS | FECHA 7](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/De3AWmXzhuA/mqdefault.jpg)
"Nostalgia is not what it used to be" - you are killing me, Tom 😂
Neither is deja vu.
Strangely enough, this Grand Seiko cream dial looks way better than all their textured dials. Great Video as always .
It’s really nice on the wrist. Just a little bit thicker that you might expect. That put me off buying it. But I still have this nagging doubt that I might actually love it 😁
The textured dials are really special.
I m a fan of 34 sizes of dress watched from 1940 and 1950 it fit my style
The Globemaster Annual Calendar has just gone to the top of my charts, what a stunning watch
Wtf is so stunning about a Rolex Homage?
@highwaystar3780 wtf is the point of this comment? All watches by all companies are homage to one line or other. And it's a personal opinion of someone who DGAF what you think, get over yourself.
@DJHalfbarr My point being. I Don't get why Anyone would Call that Lame Omega(which Most Omegas Are frankly)Stunning?? Forget Homage,...What is So Stunning about that Generic case design ? If you Didn't know it was an Omega, you wouldn't spit on it ! Now I'm Over it !!
@@highwaystar3780you sound unhinged.
@@harryp6484 But I'm Rational and Speak the Truth !
I've always been happy with 40 to 42 mm. Never been a fan of the cornflake hands much, but a sound-of-fog dial, a non-stick dial, and a cup of Swiss cheese... now you've got my attention 😂
Those cornflake hands are truly timeless. Nice and crispy.
Perfect with a cool milky dial.
The little Hamilton is my daily :) great watch! I forget it’s on my wrist and many people complement me on it - which is this case I like because it’s not because of brand recognition
Aqua Terra would be a good addition to this list too
Great job Tom
Tom really making this channel work again by himself. Love to see it working out ❤
JL Geophysic True Second wearer be like: "Nah bro it's just a quartz", "Nah bro it's just $50"
I have never been disappointed since I became a customer of amzwatch. Their watches are of exceptional quality.
Love the Tudor but love my aliexpress quartz version much more...
Solid video - enjoy Watchfinder getting back to this format of content.
All the GS SBGW 37.3mm case watches are absolutely killer, clean, and totally wearable! That cream dial (231, now 301) is classic, but I love my 287 burgundy dial! Also Nomos club campus 36 is an amazing wear at an amazing price too! But I'll always think the two kings are the DJ36 (fluted bezel, jubilee bracelet) and the explorer 36.
If GS made a proper bracelet, it would destroy the Rolex Oyster Perpetual. Such a beautiful watch.
@f.kieranfinney457 the OP and the GS SBGW series are two vastly different watches. The only similarity is both are no dates with double battin markers at some of the cardinal indices. The GS SBGW is pure dress which the OP is the O.G. waterproof rugged sports watch.
Hello Tom,,, greetings from northern Sweden and a fellow watch enthusiast.
These watches are all fantastic and you are making it it difficult to dicide... all the above to be honest.
Hey Tom, I noticed your dictation and clarity of your presentation Is getting better. Great work, chap.
Buy the JLC and spend your life trying to persuade everyone that it’s not a fake one with a quartz movement.
Yeah ,I prefer the typical sweep of machanicl movement 😊
It's true! 😂
Funny that this would be the main reason of my interest in buying it. I don't really care what people think, especially what people think they're sure to know.
This would be a great conversation starter, not for everybody and surely enough, only a few watch nerds would interact with this model. Letting aside the fact that is a stunner of a watch projected in the realm of high horology.
@@stupidocanerosait seems to not even align on the markers.
@@remmymartinnn7092 Ever heard of perspective? Really tricky to maintain aligned all the markers on a camera. Try yourself and do it better.
“Home run into the back of the net”? I think you’ve got you sport analogies a bit mixed up 🤣
Intentional mixed metaphors
The Royal Oak is a Patek according to the chapters in the video btw
Mate either too big or too small? I’ve got 8 1/2 wrists, please do a vid on larger 44-50mm watches. I really hate finding a watch that I like and find out it’s below 42mm which is the smallest I can wear without it looking like a bottle top. And can you explain why the speedmaster pro is listed as 42 mm when it’s actually 40. I’ve just bought one and not happy bunny.
16 cm wrist here. Anything larger than 37mm looks dumb on me.
17 cm wrist in my case and I think that 40mm is the maximum for me, though at the moment I’m wearing a 32mm meant for women and it doesn’t look excessively small.
@@markiangooleyI’m currently wearing a vintage omega seamaster at 33mm as well. Looks decent.
I’m also 16cm wrist. I wear up to 40mm with lug to lug of 45-48 depending on the shape of case.
Small wrist also. I've got from 36 to 42 mm watches and, IMHO, the key point is about lug to lug size. A 42 mm with small lugs could fit better than a 36 mm with long lugs.
@@user-ke6xt1yl1l agreed! And having long lugs is a waste of wrist space. It’s the dial space you want! So brands like Nomos and Muhle Glashütte are lovely but the long lugs ruin it.
Perfect timing! Just started the video and have been looking at 35mm PRXs, mainly the oddball digital one! I kinda like it in a retro-future sort of way. Never would pay for it full price but there's a significant discount on it where I'm at and I'm looking forward to getting it!
"Tissot hit a home run into the back of the net" 😂 Brilliant
I miss the conversations that you had with Andrew, I felt that you had a very good chemestry in the screen, but you are doing a pretty good job by your self
Good video Tom!
Did I just see 'Watchfinder & Co" inserted in the Carwow video about Bugatti Tourbillon? Yes, I did!
love the work. Got a laugh out of "homerun to the back of the net."
Excellent watch choices. Excellent video as usual.
The original Hamilton this new iteration is based on wasn’t just for the RAF. It was made available to 3 branches of the HM armed forces, the Army issue having the reference W10, the RAF with the 6BB & the Royal Navy having the reference 0552. The watch however, was the same across all references.
Totally love the Globemaster. If they made it 37mm and 11mm thick, it would be the one to save up for. However, having tried one on, it's very chunky and heavy unfortunately
Casio W59... kicks F91W butt...a great "rehab" break for those of us needing a rest from this one illness
Could have been titled "The Goldilocks list".... well done, Tom. Great list.
Great video. Thanks.
Ever since I bought a watch from mamacoo , My question is if it's this hard to tell them apart, what is the point of owning an authentic watch?
Love the geophysic - alas none listed on watchfinder.
Great Tom !
The Longines is the way a luxury diver should look. Skin divers are so beautiful. And no one actually dives with the bigger (and precious metal) models like Rolex.
Just curious, but is a “home run in the back of the net” a thing?
Feel like he mixed 2 sports, but I could be wrong. 😂
Pun totally intended.
Patek and Omega haven’t worked out yet how to fit the other third to half of the world on their ‘worldtimer’ watches.
Leaving out 3 or so billion people is not a good marketing move 😕
It depends on retail. But Ciga Design Blue Planet got you covered on both.
I bought this popular video watch from mamacoo , which was originally priced at a few thousand dollars, but now it's only $380! It's really suitable to pick up feces!
Is the voice over the spectacled guy from triggernometry?
This was excellent - thank you!
What size watches will fit appropriately my 6.75 inch wrist?
35-38
There’s little point to a mechanical watch that works like it’s a quartz
Royal oak ftw
That Omega Globemaster is divine.
TUDOR CORNFLAKE HANDS ? You sure ? .
Imho the best dive watch is a g shock
Nope. The best dive watch is the Suunto Dive D5.
Or an actual real dive watch. These are all toys.
“Hit a home run into the back of the net”??
I’m perhaps the only viewer who doesn’t want a Powermatic 80 watch and would rather have the same watch with a +-10 second a year quartz movement.
Tissot does that for some models, and the quartz version is cheaper.
Yes I think you are. Get the automatic. Check your phone for time if you want the ‘actual’ time.
So buy the quartz one, what's the fuss?
Haven't watched one of these videos in a long time. What happened to the old narrator?
Tudor "Cornflake" hands ✋️- that's a first, I've always heard Snowflake ❄️ hands ✋️
Load of bollocks on Rolex AP. I’ve been waiting for one for four years!!!! I wanted one for my 65th birthday and retirement. I’m now approaching 67. Rolex AD’s are no more than rip-off merchants. I have a Tudor BB58 that I love and if I get the AP option I’ll tell them to shove it where the sun doesn’t shine
I own a two-tone 36 DJ, a new 36 Exp, a GS Skyflake, a Catier Santos, and a few more, including German and Swiss. Any 36 by Rolex is just perfect on my Asian 16.5 wrist, imo. Tbh, I don't think of Rolex the same way I did 05 years ago, but there has to be a reason why Rolex is Rolex. All they do is do things correctly.
Sure.. And your Paul Newman Daytona is in the safe.
I what size santos?
Driving my 911 wearing my AP while reading this comment.
@@joewhite6875 lovely. Love an 911, however, its pretty expensive where I am.
@@1in7.8b a vintage Santos Carree
No fingers?😂
Good work Tom.
Enjoyable commentary.
Andrew who?
Cornflake hand?
what happened to the lovely background music
Ahhh....more hate from the IBWC.
Snobs hates quartz for the one tick second hand. While ultra snobs desire a one tick second hand on a mechanical watch. We just cant be satisfied i guess
Others love a quartz watch with a continuosly sweeping seconds hand. 🙋♂️
I can't watch Watchfinder videos anymore unless it's Andrew Morgan doing the talking
Hang on where's that Andrew dude?
He’s moved on
Andrew Morgan watches - that’s his new channel
@@ianp7557Really? He's not with Watchfinder anymore? Why?
I know he has his own channel but still, he was great here and I have no doubt that he was well payed.
Is there a video of him explaining why he left?
@@vegass04 tired of spending his life building someone else's channel and legacy
This I a budget Andrew!
Lost me with the PRX. The sizing makes zero sense. It's an everyday watch without a dive bezel, which means it should range from 36mm to 38mm traditionally. You can either have it in 35mm which feels VERY small even on my small wrists, or in 40mm, which is a great size for a watch with a rotating bezel, but looks like a plate with a static bezel (unless you're an obese American). It's the epitome of a watch you actually can't wear because of the sizing.
Im 5'7" 1m7 - 150lbs 70kg 5.5 inch wrist, so 38mm diameter is the best size for me. These big watch trend is getting out of hand.
They made it 35mm because the original Tissot Seastar that they modeled the PRX off of was 35mm. I have a 7 inch (17cm) wrist and own the smaller sized PRX. Fits me just fine. The integrated lugs make it wear larger than it is. To each their own though.
''You can either have it in 35mm which feels VERY small even on my small wrists''. When people mature in their watch collecting journey they begin to understand about proportion and history. It's not always about having something flashy with big wrist presence. It fits well my 6.5 inch wrist and I even have some tiny 30mm vintage watches. Men used to wear 30 to 35 all the time...
@@jacobavis9448 I regularly wear a 33.5mm Smith's Everest, a 34mm Grand Seiko...I understand the history. There is something about the 35mm PRX which does not translate well to the smaller size. I'm not sure if they directly scaled it down from the 40mm, or if they've done something with the taper on the bracelet. I was very excited to see them making it in 35mm, but as soon as I held it in the flesh I knew it hadn't worked. I love a smaller watch. If you haven't held one then you might not understand. If you have then maybe we just have different taste. For me, the 35mm misses the mark which is such a shame because it could've been awesome. And again, just my opinion but I think the 40mm is a ridiculous size for a sports watch without a chunky dive bezel.
@@MattSeesGray It's not so much the overall size, there is something which either changed or didn't translate when they scaled it down. It feels as though the taper is more aggressive, or some other angle or proportion has been changed from the original PRX design which makes it feel off to me. Each to their own indeed, and I'm glad you're enjoying your watch. I was very excited when it was launched but as soon as I held one I knew it wasn't for me.
Oyster Perpetual timeless ? It looks beyond bland. I would not pay even half it's retail price.
meh, strongly disagree on that prx. that’s how sizing is not done right. big one looks wrong, small one looks wrong. if you need to produce an integrated sports model cause everyone does it… a meh result is what we get. people were blinded by „swiss automatic“ and wanted an ap so bad they bought this one. but at the end of the day this is an average watch with questionable sizing and a mechaplastical movement.
That sells in metric tons. They know what they are doing, be assured. They don't need resentful Average Joe's blabbering.
@@stupidocanerosa this is the watch for the average fellow. and selling tons means what, regarding quality..?
you contradict yourself within 4 lines.
no need to be sad now, you didn’t produce this.
@@call1a1rich I do contradict??
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 you are talking about sizing right? I answered Tissot knows which sizes to produce and sell and the demonstration is in the market success. So, where's the contradiction?
Aah, quality... were you talking about quality or sizing?
@@stupidocanerosa look, that watch is not as good as people want it to be. that’s all Im saying. I understand owners trying to defend it, but sales numbers as an argument don’t mean anything regarding quality. take the moonswatch for example. sure companies know what is selling right now, but you are able to make up your own mind about it. and if millions love it, it still can be crap.
enjoy ya day, gotta go
@@call1a1rich Have a nice day. Now, to whom will continue reading, I'm not an owner nor an enthusiast of the Tissot PRX.
YOU started the conversation on the "bad sizing choices", I replied about the "sizing choices made by experts in the market giving them a reasonable feedback they chose right", YOU got offended replying with "quality bla bla", I explained why YOU misunderstood, YOU answered with more gibberish about quality... WE WERE TALKING ABOUT SIZES!
Let's get this straight: what are talking about? Sizes or quality?
Try to make yourself a copy of someone else
I am so happy Andrew’s metaphors are gone 👻