It is certainly a very viable Medium Soft poly that is suitable for all levels, unlike some other harsher/firmer polys. I gave it a B for that 3.5-4.0 level because there are other polys that in my view (It is subjective of course) are even more performant and comfortable and would earn an A
I think he was wrong. I enjoy the longer video's. If you put timestamps in the video like you usually do they can just skip towards what they want to watch if they have a gen zoomer-like attention span..
At 1.15mm I find it excellent for 3.5 and below.
It is certainly a very viable Medium Soft poly that is suitable for all levels, unlike some other harsher/firmer polys. I gave it a B for that 3.5-4.0 level because there are other polys that in my view (It is subjective of course) are even more performant and comfortable and would earn an A
What is the main difference between this and SSO? SSO more lively? which one has better control in your opinion?
That's right, SSO is a bit more lively and has better depth of feel and acoustics. Identical control characteristics 👍
I think he was wrong. I enjoy the longer video's. If you put timestamps in the video like you usually do they can just skip towards what they want to watch if they have a gen zoomer-like attention span..
Need to find a way to close the gap between the gens ;-)
I stopped watching the hawaii guy reviews because they are boring, vague and very subjective.
He also doesnt know how to test strings because he switches tension and racket in every video
Do you know the channel name for the Hawaii guy? I looked and if its the person I found, then no way will I emulate that format.
@@TK-Tennis opencourt
@@k1ytennis304 Cool, that is the same person. Thanks and I'll keep working on my format and presentation