Question 1 correct option should be C imo because getting another testing agency to test the product at least gives the consumers some assurance that the product is safe. Filing a case would not help in changing the consumer's opinions about the product as much. Unless they mean something like "revenge" by the term "bounce back".
No, Opt E is Correct because if another Agency comes then in Public there will be no assurance as 2 REPORTS are already there. But Now we know, it is confirmed that the Private Agency is bribed by someone then it is sure that they will not gonna have any pointers to prove themselves & taking Opt E as action will Ensure in Public that the company is SURE that their Product is Safe
In first optiot C is most appropriate answer because if we choose option E it is not a quick process to prove the customer at the same time without proper evidence, how can file defamation case?
Sir in question no 2 the question stem should have been....What would Ambika most likely do.. instead of what she should do given her characterisation and nature So the answer option should be D which is correct 'What she should do' looks more of a suggestion from outside in this scenario the answer option should be C....
brologically also college authorities rarely take students serious actually.It's only when fee paying parents convey them strictly they feel like taking action.So informing is vbest also her character supports it.
for question 2, complaining to the college authorities is a good option because the seniors would also be harassing other juniors and if there is a general action taken by authorities it cant be traced back to ambika, this would also help her other batchmates, and in this option there is no running away from problem rather facing it anonymously and the question states that what should she do not what would she do. and if the parents get involved the seniors will surely direct their anger on her after her parents take any action(which they surely will).
@@ritwikjharia6891 From another corrected paper: Correct answer: E Exp: The objective is to bounce back i.e. resurrect the damaged image of the company and dispel all the doubts about their products. The company should ensure that such incidents are not repeated. The root cause of the problem is that the testing agency engaged in an inappropriate action (whereas the agency was supposed to be fair and neutral) at the behest of the competitor and this should be nipped in the bud. Option A and C: The option does address the national outcry but does not address the proxy war by the competitor, which might recur. Option B: The decision is inappropriate and not addressing the problem at all. Option D: Their competitor is engaged in a proxy war. So, directly targeting the competitor will be a disaster. Option E: The decision is appropriate as it targets the testing agency and not the competitor. It also addresses the national outcry indirectly because only a brand confident of its product quality will file a defamation suit. This in a way reassures the consumer about the product quality. Therefore Option E is the correct answer.
They are asking what ambika should do not what she would do please clarify this sir the word sould adds a suggestive tone to the passage rather what she would actually do.
Ambika is just afraid of ragging. This doesn't necessarily imply that ragging is prevalent. Option E seems a good option as that will help her understand other students and talking may help her make friends and a good group.
she is also intelligent. An intelligent person won't make up scenario's in her head. I think the intelligence implies that ragging exists in the college.
my initial choice for ambika was to tell her parents , since she has also cleared jee , she can join engg. since its only been a few weeks , however , there is no guarantee , that there will not be ragging in engg. Hence , I thought that since she has not faced ragging yet , but is afraid of it , she should talk to seniors that if she is ragged , she would complain , but then again , that might not stop them .
Question 1 correct option should be C imo because getting another testing agency to test the product at least gives the consumers some assurance that the product is safe. Filing a case would not help in changing the consumer's opinions about the product as much. Unless they mean something like "revenge" by the term "bounce back".
No, Opt E is Correct because if another Agency comes then in Public there will be no assurance as 2 REPORTS are already there. But Now we know, it is confirmed that the Private Agency is bribed by someone then it is sure that they will not gonna have any pointers to prove themselves & taking Opt E as action will Ensure in Public that the company is SURE that their Product is Safe
Exactly. I was also thinking the same.
@@akashthiagarajan1505 Plus one. Has to be opt C!!
Option C is the correct answer in actual answer key
In first optiot C is most appropriate answer because if we choose option E it is not a quick process to prove the customer at the same time without proper evidence, how can file defamation case?
The question has not asked any quick outcomes or immediate effect
Thank you Sir🙏
Sir in question no 2 the question stem should have been....What would Ambika most likely do.. instead of what she should do given her characterisation and nature
So the answer option should be D which is correct
'What she should do' looks more of a suggestion from outside in this scenario the answer option should be C....
brologically also college authorities rarely take students serious actually.It's only when fee paying parents convey them strictly they feel like taking action.So informing is vbest also her character supports it.
for question 2, complaining to the college authorities is a good option because the seniors would also be harassing other juniors and if there is a general action taken by authorities it cant be traced back to ambika, this would also help her other batchmates, and in this option there is no running away from problem rather facing it anonymously and the question states that what should she do not what would she do. and if the parents get involved the seniors will surely direct their anger on her after her parents take any action(which they surely will).
most apt answer should be C in the first question
yes
yes I think so, but why the answer is E?😬🤥
@@ritwikjharia6891 From another corrected paper:
Correct answer: E
Exp: The objective is to bounce back i.e. resurrect the damaged image of the
company and dispel all the doubts about their products. The company should
ensure that such incidents are not repeated. The root cause of the problem is that
the testing agency engaged in an inappropriate action (whereas the agency was
supposed to be fair and neutral) at the behest of the competitor and this should be
nipped in the bud.
Option A and C: The option does address the national outcry but does not address
the proxy war by the competitor, which might recur.
Option B: The decision is inappropriate and not addressing the problem at all.
Option D: Their competitor is engaged in a proxy war. So, directly targeting the
competitor will be a disaster.
Option E: The decision is appropriate as it targets the testing agency and not the
competitor.
It also addresses the national outcry indirectly because only a brand confident of its
product quality will file a defamation suit. This in a way reassures the consumer
about the product quality.
Therefore Option E is the correct answer.
@@daanishsingh6599 can you please tell the source, where you found E as the correct one, cus I feel likewise
@@daanishsingh6599 Can you give the source please
They are asking what ambika should do not what she would do please clarify this sir the word sould adds a suggestive tone to the passage rather what she would actually do.
Same doubt
Same doubt.Pleaae clarify.
Ambika is just afraid of ragging. This doesn't necessarily imply that ragging is prevalent. Option E seems a good option as that will help her understand other students and talking may help her make friends and a good group.
she is also intelligent. An intelligent person won't make up scenario's in her head. I think the intelligence implies that ragging exists in the college.
sir according to me it is asking. my advice to her is what question seeking for. answer is c
For Question 2 it asks "what she should do" and not what she would do. And hence, ideally she should be complaining!!
my initial choice for ambika was to tell her parents , since she has also cleared jee , she can join engg. since its only been a few weeks , however , there is no guarantee , that there will not be ragging in engg. Hence , I thought that since she has not faced ragging yet , but is afraid of it , she should talk to seniors that if she is ragged , she would complain , but then again , that might not stop them .
Overthinking
7:00
Sir, in the second question, it is not given that ragging is prevalent but only that Ambika is afraid. So, should she not go for option A
Thanks Sir
Thank you So much Sir