@@jama211....WRONG IN THE objective sense, sir. Ever see the movie called ROB ROY? The one brutish Highlander type gets his ass handed to him thoroughly and convincingly whipped in arrogant and aristocratic fashion exemplified by the other sword player who in all reality very skilled is nevertheless a wretched louse just the same but in a vacuum such as now, The Highlander brute in defeat, personally tries to vindicate himself by ultimately killing the aristocratic wannabe while bowing to the crowd and his back turned and one of the two nobles wagering on the event while discussing their conspiritual type dramatics at the same time, The lesser evil of the two nobles who as well lost wagering on his brutal Highlander stable fighter/gladiator etc etc stands up and says OUT LOUD (and this is where YOU fit in mate with your Jacobite statement🤨) "MUST YOU FURTHER EMBARRASS YOUR LOSS BY PLAYING ROLE OF BACKSTABBER AS WELL???!!!" ....??
If you dont play snooker you just dont understand how amazing that is. Ive been playing 20 years and over that distance i wouldn't be able to get any screw back at all
Table quality has a lot to do with it so don't beat yourself up. I've played on Club tables then played on a tour table and screwed back beyond my own beliefe I thought possible. They react totally different when heated and the nap is perfect.
TBH been playing 15 yrs and small tournament. I say it's impressive I can do it and you can do it as well. Key is extension/go through the cue ball. The speed not power
Some people make the mistake of cueing with a jabby action to induce the backspin, but you've got to cue through the ball and follow through like with a golf swing.
Maan the timing on these shots is absolutely amazing. People who aren't avid pool players don't really realize how extremely difficult this shot is, especially on a snooker table.
He's playing snooker, on a snooker table. Most of the people watching are avid snooker players. I get it that some pool players are also watching, but don't use a pool reference to describe what Judd is doing... because it's not pool.
@@castleanthrax1833he's playing snooker alright buh the shot they're showcasing here happens in all billiard disciplines.. Jason Shaw and the likes have pulled that off couple of times in pool.
His timing is second to none..if you watch his back hand on the butt through the shot he generates cue speed by punching through better than any other player. Think of Jimmy white back in the day
Judd has the best stroke on tour right now, and has for some time. If he worked on the tactical stuff a bit he would be a force to be reckoned with. He should pick up one pocket, maybe even on a big snooker table, it helped Bata
I have played snooker over 20 years, had 1 century break and a few others that were close! This is by far the hardest shot for me to play, I’ve never been able to generate enough screw back
The hands down BEST cue action the way they are describing it AND even shorter than they are describing it is, DING, from China. NOW.....all the reasons WHY for this and that the way they are describing it, is the reason why I say the official book of "pool" truly has not been written. ONCE MORE, when you basically have nothing but the opinions shared by these two players in the video, I dare anyone to now make any objective clinical sense that will hold up under direct question or legitimate scrutiny. There is no doubt that the process in successful outcome such as here, demonstrated twice i believe by Trump, starts with the eyes....a visual pattern starting from the stand up position and then a instinctive and or logic based pattern and sequence from the stand up until finally down at address with the bridge hand down on the table surface etc etc. The reason I am mentioning this aspect, is to AND by no means SUGGEST, that I myself who can explain a successful outcome and even further by the difference between outcome and EFFECT, which Trump demonstrates on the first part of the equation but DOES NOT on the second side, is TWO FOLD: 1) I am aware that the successful act ITSELF although purely mechanical, does not and cannot ever take place without shared responsibility of the eyes to begin with and additionally, a side note or point of contention that a correct visual pattern OUTSIDE of typical standard logic, can now be more responsible for a successful outcome in THEORY because no doubt: a) a amateur novice in general, cannot demonstrate a successful execution such as Trump because often times in majority amateur fashion, the way they visually approach the shot, ends up being outside of any successful opportunity because they are simply not mechanically in line with the reality of the shot relationship and it's associated line of successful delivery b)......to be clear,, the best mechanical setup cannot ever be a binary event, as to suggest ultimately it is purely mechanical to successfully execute a long straight-in ...power draw/deep screw....nor at the same time be solely blamed on a bad visual pattern, because both, a visual and mechanical event must take place together.... even though the mechanical portion is objective and never subjective. THATS the big problem here because nothing objective is being explained in the objective sense. A short back-swing/take-back, can objectively be argued to be of utmost importance and or even absolutely paramount on both sides of the equation that Trump himself does not satisfy in criteria. "I feel...." as stated by Trump, doesn't explain anything and once MORE proves that his opinion ITSELF is truly a "non-starter" in qualified TERMS. (Not to mention in terms of result as well, because no doubt a successful outcome, it's still factually limited in terms of successful effect....a true power-draw/deep-screw should never be measured in successful outcome terms, but rather....tip/stick angle of attack + cue ball MPH speed going forward/back spin/revolutions per inch or foot or millimeters or meters etc .... however the universal outcome of measurement wants to be expressed in EFFECTIVE terms FIRST before ever discussing or listing a final result successful or not. Why? It's simple.....a higher forward speed with minimal backspin can produce a successful outcome....BUT limited in effect, BECAUSE the successful intention of coming back the opposite direction TOWARD YOU is due to a ELASTIC EVENT in cue ball two object ball collision....a bounce back occurrence, RATHER THAN, a successful effect that would be way different where somebody like DING from China and or Stephen Lee is more apt to produce because of a much better penetration LOW through the cue ball that produces a much higher backspin rate and more typical slower forward speed as a result of the tip of the stick and its relative speed now producing more backspin rather than what you see here with Trump, just below center in this case, a high speed going forward and a weak roll of speed barely making it past the balk.....not to mention the god awful and for sure non-qualified statement of "even a miss is still good weight" back to etc etc... COME ON NOW, How ridiculous does this porn video now have to be? Two of the best in history, neither of them having objectivity to offer and then PURE FANTASY that two different events now produces the same outcome.... especially with a long deep screw where REALITY IS THREE-DIMENSIONAL and therefore since the criteria needed for a successful long deep screw requires multiple effects to take place where if one of the multiple requirements is not satisfied, then as a normal occurrence, one or more of the other requirements become compromised. ESPECIALLY WITH A DEEP SCREW QUESTION.....a miss could very easily result on a cue ball sliding a few inches to the left or right and perhaps half of the time the object ball now missing the pocket coming back up table hits the cue ball and the cue ball laughably goes back past the balk line and THEREFORE yes lol sometimes it works out but most of the time the ultimate point and no matter what is not addressed. That helps no one ..NEITHER does this video and of course If I am offered anything in its final informative and factual result, I get crucified or the electric chair.... Makes no difference though because I know I'm right.
@@michaelleigh2076 wow. Look at Higgins. If he had the same winning % as Ronnie, John would have at least 6 WC. Hes won 4 lost 4. Yaa Judd unfortunately has a bad winning % too
@@kenith287it’s so much more competitive at the top than it used to be. I doubt we’ll see someone dominate the WC again for several years running anytime soon.
I think if Judd Trump would of beat Higgins in hes first worlds final Judd would of moved up to another level and Ronnie confidence wouldn’t be as high as today Took Judd a while to get into a world final and win Most snooker player winners are over 30 years ago Not sure if that’s experience or the youngsters are earning enough money by not reaching the final
"Didn't think that was a good one" should see mine then 😂
SH's laugh said it all, i wish i could do that
Tell me about it. I can barely even do a stun shot at that distance, let alone draw the white back to baulk
@@BiggyJimbo practice Jimbo
@@mste456 Trying to.. it's fun trying to improve but when I see the pros do these shots I realize how far I have to go
With these shots, no matter how much practise and experience, I can never pull back more than a few inches
Bro said I’ll take the the accuracy out, but still hit it
Before he was winning anything I loved Judd because of his cue action. He’d always blast them accurately and let that cue ball go. Fun player to watch
His cue control is immense, up there with anyones. So so effortless
Fun player to watch but bomb scare to bet on at times
Long or short backswing, snooker is all about ‘feels’
Well pointed out Samal
It's all about the cue action mate
@@Leo31291which you feel
@@Leo31291and the ranking points
@@jama211....WRONG IN THE objective sense, sir.
Ever see the movie called ROB ROY?
The one brutish Highlander type gets his ass handed to him thoroughly and convincingly whipped in arrogant and aristocratic fashion exemplified by the other sword player who in all reality very skilled is nevertheless a wretched louse just the same but in a vacuum such as now, The Highlander brute in defeat, personally tries to vindicate himself by ultimately killing the aristocratic wannabe while bowing to the crowd and his back turned and one of the two nobles wagering on the event while discussing their conspiritual type dramatics at the same time, The lesser evil of the two nobles who as well lost wagering on his brutal Highlander stable fighter/gladiator etc etc stands up and says OUT LOUD (and this is where YOU fit in mate with your Jacobite statement🤨)
"MUST YOU FURTHER EMBARRASS YOUR LOSS BY PLAYING ROLE OF BACKSTABBER AS WELL???!!!"
....??
Absolutely love watching people like judd, white and luka. The power they have is just insane
You are awesome , Judd !!!
If you dont play snooker you just dont understand how amazing that is.
Ive been playing 20 years and over that distance i wouldn't be able to get any screw back at all
Table quality has a lot to do with it so don't beat yourself up. I've played on Club tables then played on a tour table and screwed back beyond my own beliefe I thought possible. They react totally different when heated and the nap is perfect.
TBH been playing 15 yrs and small tournament. I say it's impressive I can do it and you can do it as well. Key is extension/go through the cue ball. The speed not power
@user-qb5hv3tx1c on my tables theres no way over that distance
@@user-qb5hv3tx1c having said that not the best cueist
Some people make the mistake of cueing with a jabby action to induce the backspin, but you've got to cue through the ball and follow through like with a golf swing.
Absolute magician
Maan the timing on these shots is absolutely amazing. People who aren't avid pool players don't really realize how extremely difficult this shot is, especially on a snooker table.
He's playing snooker, on a snooker table. Most of the people watching are avid snooker players. I get it that some pool players are also watching, but don't use a pool reference to describe what Judd is doing... because it's not pool.
@@castleanthrax1833he's playing snooker alright buh the shot they're showcasing here happens in all billiard disciplines.. Jason Shaw and the likes have pulled that off couple of times in pool.
His timing is second to none..if you watch his back hand on the butt through the shot he generates cue speed by punching through better than any other player. Think of Jimmy white back in the day
yep, a classic left handed
Judd has the best stroke on tour right now, and has for some time. If he worked on the tactical stuff a bit he would be a force to be reckoned with. He should pick up one pocket, maybe even on a big snooker table, it helped Bata
Living legend S Hendry is my fav player...
He always had awesome cue power. And he’s one of the slightest players
Tall tho
Strength makes no difference.
nothing to do with size - it's timing that generates work on the cue ball
@@haydenwalton2766 very true mate. Like the way I power then in 😉
That's ridiculous how well he times those shots
That was class, Judd!
Hendry in awe of the cue power
Great lads Judd & Stephen
His accuracy and power shots are the best in the game these past few years.
Has timing is absolutely incredibly remarkable. Because it is that good that's why he doesn't miss que that often
Incredible talent.
It's the wrist flick
best queue action in the game
Where’s the cue ball going??!!!
Shut up, John. 😂
In your pocket.
My favourite living legend - Judd Trump
I have played snooker over 20 years, had 1 century break and a few others that were close! This is by far the hardest shot for me to play, I’ve never been able to generate enough screw back
How does he take the accuracy out and still nails it in.
Take's the piss that and I'm more for it, what a player ❤️
One of My Favourite @Judd ❤love from India❤
Judd je na prvom svetskom prvenstvu igrao fenomenalno , niko i nikada nece igrati tako dobro pa ni onsam.on jepravi genije ❤
My favourite player to watch.
It’s amazing how he get so much que power
The hands down BEST cue action the way they are describing it AND even shorter than they are describing it is, DING, from China.
NOW.....all the reasons WHY for this and that the way they are describing it, is the reason why I say the official book of "pool" truly has not been written.
ONCE MORE, when you basically have nothing but the opinions shared by these two players in the video, I dare anyone to now make any objective clinical sense that will hold up under direct question or legitimate scrutiny.
There is no doubt that the process in successful outcome such as here, demonstrated twice i believe by Trump, starts with the eyes....a visual pattern starting from the stand up position and then a instinctive and or logic based pattern and sequence from the stand up until finally down at address with the bridge hand down on the table surface etc etc.
The reason I am mentioning this aspect, is to AND by no means SUGGEST, that I myself who can explain a successful outcome and even further by the difference between outcome and EFFECT, which Trump demonstrates on the first part of the equation but DOES NOT on the second side, is TWO FOLD:
1) I am aware that the successful act ITSELF although purely mechanical, does not and cannot ever take place without shared responsibility of the eyes to begin with and additionally, a side note or point of contention that a correct visual pattern OUTSIDE of typical standard logic, can now be more responsible for a successful outcome in THEORY because no doubt:
a) a amateur novice in general, cannot demonstrate a successful execution such as Trump because often times in majority amateur fashion, the way they visually approach the shot, ends up being outside of any successful opportunity because they are simply not mechanically in line with the reality of the shot relationship and it's associated line of successful delivery
b)......to be clear,, the best mechanical setup cannot ever be a binary event, as to suggest ultimately it is purely mechanical to successfully execute a long straight-in ...power draw/deep screw....nor at the same time be solely blamed on a bad visual pattern, because both, a visual and mechanical event must take place together.... even though the mechanical portion is objective and never subjective.
THATS the big problem here because nothing objective is being explained in the objective sense.
A short back-swing/take-back, can objectively be argued to be of utmost importance and or even absolutely paramount on both sides of the equation that Trump himself does not satisfy in criteria.
"I feel...." as stated by Trump, doesn't explain anything and once MORE proves that his opinion ITSELF is truly a "non-starter" in qualified TERMS.
(Not to mention in terms of result as well, because no doubt a successful outcome, it's still factually limited in terms of successful effect....a true power-draw/deep-screw should never be measured in successful outcome terms, but rather....tip/stick angle of attack + cue ball MPH speed going forward/back spin/revolutions per inch or foot or millimeters or meters etc .... however the universal outcome of measurement wants to be expressed in EFFECTIVE terms FIRST before ever discussing or listing a final result successful or not.
Why?
It's simple.....a higher forward speed with minimal backspin can produce a successful outcome....BUT limited in effect, BECAUSE the successful intention of coming back the opposite direction TOWARD YOU is due to a ELASTIC EVENT in cue ball two object ball collision....a bounce back occurrence,
RATHER THAN,
a successful effect that would be way different where somebody like DING from China and or Stephen Lee is more apt to produce because of a much better penetration LOW through the cue ball that produces a much higher backspin rate and more typical slower forward speed as a result of the tip of the stick and its relative speed now producing more backspin rather than what you see here with Trump, just below center in this case, a high speed going forward and a weak roll of speed barely making it past the balk.....not to mention the god awful and for sure non-qualified statement of "even a miss is still good weight" back to etc etc...
COME ON NOW, How ridiculous does this porn video now have to be? Two of the best in history, neither of them having objectivity to offer and then PURE FANTASY that two different events now produces the same outcome.... especially with a long deep screw where REALITY IS THREE-DIMENSIONAL and therefore since the criteria needed for a successful long deep screw requires multiple effects to take place where if one of the multiple requirements is not satisfied, then as a normal occurrence, one or more of the other requirements become compromised.
ESPECIALLY WITH A DEEP SCREW QUESTION.....a miss could very easily result on a cue ball sliding a few inches to the left or right and perhaps half of the time the object ball now missing the pocket coming back up table hits the cue ball and the cue ball laughably goes back past the balk line and THEREFORE yes lol sometimes it works out but most of the time the ultimate point and no matter what is not addressed.
That helps no one ..NEITHER does this video and of course If I am offered anything in its final informative and factual result, I get crucified or the electric chair.... Makes no difference though because I know I'm right.
Does this mean there is an upcoming video with Judd soon?
ruclips.net/video/alUKGExgiqE/видео.htmlsi=v69ddVEGYB3ukGQR
Nice to see Chris Martin have a side hustle away from Coldplay! 😅
Favourite ball Yellow!
Excellent
Insane
Is this that badass snooker player? ( badass as in extremely talented)
He's one of the best right now, yes.
2 in a row!😮
The only mystery about Judd is him winning only 1 WC. The guy is on pace to winning the most ranking events but mannnn he needs more WC for sure
So many top players, took him longer to mature than players like ronnie higgins selby etc
@@michaelleigh2076 yep. But only 1 WC!??! Wow. Shocking
@@kenith287 i think hes lost 3 finals
@@michaelleigh2076 wow. Look at Higgins. If he had the same winning % as Ronnie, John would have at least 6 WC. Hes won 4 lost 4. Yaa Judd unfortunately has a bad winning % too
@@kenith287it’s so much more competitive at the top than it used to be. I doubt we’ll see someone dominate the WC again for several years running anytime soon.
What a guy!
The Best Judd Trump
Would be good to see a game played with a pros POV, get a cam mounted on yer heed Stephen
He`s done that already.
Unbelievable lad lol
Let’s get Jimmy White on the show
Just remember, when he's talking about his bridge hand being back quite a bit, he means an inch or so further... NOT 4 or 5 inches.
“I didn’t feel that was a good one”.. if I play similar screw shot, I will miss the pot and probably cue ball will find a way to go to pot.
2 king❤
He seems to come down on the ball similar to ronnie
Every time I try to do a backspin I end up with a dirty back.
Whenever I attempt backspin the cue balls ends up jumping off the table 😅
I think if Judd Trump would of beat Higgins in hes first worlds final
Judd would of moved up to another level and Ronnie confidence wouldn’t be as high as today
Took Judd a while to get into a world final and win
Most snooker player winners are over 30 years ago
Not sure if that’s experience or the youngsters are earning enough money by not reaching the final
He’s taking the piss! 😹👌
Yes, Judd, your bridge has shortened from when you were younger because your arms have grown!
My goat love from Pakistan 🇵🇰
Trumps cool guy
I'll never backscrew like Judd
Ally 🤩🤩
Hendry can't control his own diet.
Would love to see him do that in a club with cloths like wolly jumpers.. 🥺😂
Judd trumps again 😂
Astaji mara
Piss easy lol
Trump on the spectrum.
Still nt good enough lol
FREAK!