oh man the Neville omission was such a crime! I mean there was so much content in the books that something inevitability was going to be cut out, but that was such a crucial aspect of Neville's character development in the book. When Neville finds out that Bellatrix is out of prison in the books it's like the complete turning point for Neville, he basically becomes the badass of the series from that point on making rapid progress in in the DA lessons and becoming the leader of DA by the 7th book. Maybe it's just that Neville was such a superior character that he would have overshadowed Harry to some extent, but they did his character development a disservice in this movie
Specially considering Neville's actual importance to the plot (namely, that all it would have taken would have been a mental coin toss from Voldemort for _him_ to be the actual protagonist of the story).
exactly, and I think that plot point was what the movies were trying to avoid, because it kinda diminishes the whole "chosen one" angle of Harry if there's another character with the exact same qualities.
honestly speaking, i had a friend who had never read any HP book, but had seen all the movies; didnt actually know that the prophecy could have pointed out to Neville as well.
The lost of Peeves is also sad. I really love the moment when as the twins break out they scream "Give Her hell, peeves." and the poltergeist tips his hat to them.
In my not-so-humble- opinion, Goblet of Fire was the crux, the lynchpin of the series- specifically in the graveyard. When Harry makes the choice to get up from behind where he was crouched, and decides to face Voldemort head-on, that is THE MOMENT in the whole series. Everything hangs on his decision to get up and fight. And I love that moment. That's where I burst into tears- book and movie both.
It's when things changed, the series became less about the fun and whimsy of this magical world, and more about stopping a terrible evil, becoming more action oriented. I honestly love the change, as the first three movies feel completely different from the others, but it still fits within the context of the story. It's rather genius.
UPRlSlNGG In the book he asks Harry very calmly "Did you put your name in the Goblet of Fire?". In the movie he storms up to him asking "HARRY DID YOU PUT YOUR NAME IN THE GOBLET OF FIRE?!".
I wish they would have included the Weasley's picking up Harry from the Dursley's in the movie. That was probably the funniest moment in the book. Arthur blasting his way out of the boarded up fireplace and the Dursley family all in their nicest suits covered in dust. And Uncle Vernon throwing things at Arthur. And Petunia yanking on Dudley's giant tongue after his fat ass ate that candy Fred dropped. So damn funny.
Lol i bought all seven books for first time and iam reading them and iam reading fourth one i read 105 pages in a hour and a half and I remember reading that part
Yeah, it's dumb how they made a generic action movie out of it. The Department of Mysteries was when the book got good for me (even though it's at the very end)
The best part of the OotP book was Harry completely trashing Dumbledore's office in a huge emotional outburst after the end of a really fucking bad year and Sirius death.
Man the movies were so unrespectful to Sirius and his relationship with Harry, he´s actually so much more present and supportive, it makes you feel the family love Harry never had. And you missed Harry´s grief after Sirius dies, the long talk they had in Albus´s office a whole morning and in between all the things from the office Harry destroyed in a rage attack he had while struggling with realising Sirius was death and Albus being alright with Harry tearing apart his precious objects. It was very harsh on the book. In the movie is not like that at all. Also as a fun thing that Gilderoy Lockhart appears on the Mental Asylum when visting Neville parents, and he´s out of his mind af.
Movies 4 and 5 are the absolute WORST in the series, while books 4 and 5 are the best for that exact reason. There was very little to no fan service left in the 4th and 5th movies. A mind boggling decision seeing as how the main demographic watching the movies would be PEOPLE WHO HAVE READ THE BOOKS. Radcliffe supposedly was drunk in many scenes he did... why not go ahead and let him loose destroying Dumbledore's office?
The 4 book moments from Year 4 that I missed the most was: *1)* The Dursleys. *2)* The actual Quidditch World Cup match. *3)* Barty Crouch Jr.'s explanation of how he escaped Azkaban with his mother's help, and *4)* Those 3 words that should have capped Albus' eulogy: "Remember Cedric Diggory", which could have EASILY been added in AR as the camera panned up to the Great Hall ceiling. Anyway.... everyone has their opinions, but for me, those were the moments.
You forgot how we not only see Neville's parents in St. Mungos (I believe they cut St. Mungos because it sounds like a racial slur) But also the fate of professor Lockhart
After having his mind changed completely by Ron's broken wand, it was clear that using a broken wand was more dangerous than borrowing another person's wand, because the wand would change loyalty if you overpowered the other wizard, Ron got lucky when he only got sick trying to use the wand, he could have been mentally handicapped the rest of his life, which is why by breaking the elder wand Harry makes sure no one can use it again
Yeah he breaks it. Without repairing his old wand. I can deal with him breaking it but really? What are we meant to assume he just got Ollivander to make another one? It was a brilliant scene in the book because it shows Harry staying as normal as he can despite who he could be.
TheDark4light that and again broken wands are not usable they make that clear in the book, Ollivander couldn't make a wand made by death, a wand everyone would kill over for centuries, so Harry does the only reasonable thing he breaks it, making sure no one else could use it
As for his old wand who's to say he doesn't just take a feather from Fauxes the Phoenix and have Ollivander make another wand? Ron didn't get his wand fixed he got a new one and never complained about it feeling wrong, the wand chooses the wizard therefor fixing broken wands is impossible because they are sentient to the point that they choose the wizard
I think a major problem with these adaptations was that the movies were being made while the books were still being written, meaning the screenwriters and directors didn't know what would and what wouldn't be important.
@@trisin What Rubberman means is that several of the films had been made or were in process before book 7 was published, and Jo herself says she was extremely secretive about how it would play out. Other reviewers, both serious and YT plebes like Cinemafix, have commented on the same thing.
Actually, JK Rowling was in constant contact with screenwriter Steve Kloves and did let the creative team know what would be important. For example, they were gonna cut Kreacher out of movie 5 (the only movie Kloves didn't write btw) but she told them he had to be in it because he'd be important later. These movies are different from the books simply because every movie adaptation is different from the books. I'm not saying you fall under this, but a lot of book readers can't seem to grasp that it's gonna be different, and that's ok that it is.
Neither Gambon nor Harris was a good Dumbledore. Gambon was a little too over the top, and just has a totally different personality than the Dumbledore of the books. And Harris was too subdued, lacking any sort of gravitas, instead giving Dumbledore an aura of "I'm gonna drop dead any moment, and even speaking is a struggle for me." The Dumbledore of the books was described as a much more animated character than Harris's. But overall, I'm more willing to accept Gambon's stronger interpretation of the character rather than Harris's. Can you even imagine Harris dueling Voldemort in book 5??
Yes I can. Harris never had the chance to play the more furious side of Dumbledore, he acted true to the source material, in Book 1 and 2 Dumbledore was that calm. Nevertheless, he was never described like how Gambon played him. Even when angry, it was more of a tranquil fury, never shouting like an idiot. I think Harris would have nailed that part.
The order of the phoenix movie is a crime. It is the second shortest movie and excludes so much cool stuff from the book. And its not like the stuff they left out was because they couldn't fit it in. It would have been easy to show them at St Mungos, or extend the sequence in the department of mysteries etc etc etc
Borat Sagdiyev the 5th movie was the the worst movie of then all, and it is because of that, that the 7th did not acomplish wath it should have done, i honestly can not forgiven then for let doby out of the movie and for neglet Nevels family story. I went and read the book because i felt that there were more to the story. But you can't make a perfect adaptation.
jamiebellwolf they did a fantastic job, but u have to admit that they could have done a better job at it. As an exemple look at the lord of the rings adaptation, it is diffrent from the books but it was great, thougth they were 3 ours movies.
Actually, I think it's mentioned it was red light that hit Sirius in the department of mysteries, suggesting a stunner rather than a killing curse which is green. Going through the veil meant his death but if he hadn't fallen through, he might have been okay. In the film, they just make it green and clearer that Belatrix killed him.
While a Stunning Spell is red, its not the only spell of that color. Knowing Bellatrix Lestrange, I think it is more likely that she would cast a Cruciatus Curse than a stunner, even if she and Sirius were cousins. Another possibility would be the Disarming Charm, which is said to have a Scarlet color.
I whipped out my book to check. It says Bellatrix fired a jet of red light which Sirius easily evaded and he taunted her to do better. Bellatrix's "second jet of light" hit Sirius. It can easliy be assumed it was another red jet (which I, too, do) but it could be any colour. As to which spell she used, we can only assume it wasn't a green jet symbolising Avada Kedavra. The only indication is that Sirius' "eyes widened in chock" and he had a "look of mingled fear and surprise" on his face. Stupefy (as I see it) doesn't allow the target to show any emotions, they just drop unconcious. Who knows? Hagrid could take a few without falling. Maybe Sirius was just so resiliant he could stay concious (albeit not in control of his body) for the duration of him falling backwards into the veil. In short: All we know is that she used a jet of light. Colour presumably red. Have a nice day.
I was so mad that they left out the scene where Harry, Fred, and George beat the ever-living hell out of Malfoy. Also can't wait to hear the differences in Half-Blood prince where literally every important detail about Voldemort's past is replaced by teen romance.
What's interesting about the book version is that Crouch Jr's plan was for Neville to help Harry but Harry ends up not asking him which means Dobby gets roped in craftily. So the movie basically has the original plan work. I kind of liked that. Very simple and effective.
YES!!!!!!!!!! Someone finally agrees with me that Neville Longbottom got shorted in the fifth film. The character is so much more because of the books. They REALLY should have put this in the film so those that don't read the books will have even that much more... well everything for Neville. Okay that's all. Can't wait for part three. This has been great so far, thank-you for doing this in such a nice way. - "Always" devoted
AND NOTHING ABOUT THE PROPHECY????? You get mad about the absence of the hospital scene with Neville, but you don't worry about the prophecy??? (I'm not that upset, I'm just surprised)
Why you are bitching so much about the prophecy? That even Rowling ditched that apart as well because she was a pussy and not wanted to her hero become a murder, so she created the Horcrux and the Wand Ex Machina to justified Harry not becoming a murder.
TheKeyser94 Stop using feminine words to try and insult women. There's nothing inherently wrong with bitches and pussies. And Jo's interpretation of prophecies is amazing, because they only are self-fulfilling ones.
Ganychan No her interpretation is pure wish-fulfilment, nothing more, nothing less, she was afraid, she had no guts, she should have ended what she had began, not give excuses for the character not to have character development, that story would have ended much better if Harry actually had become a killer.
TheKeyser94 "That story would have ended much better if Harry had become a killer". No. Sometimes courage and "having guts" is about not killing and being the better person while trying to give the one who hurt you the opportunity to repent.
Ganychan No, that isn't being brave, that is playing safe, because you are fucking afraid of actually doing something new or innovative, speak about a controversial subject, Rowling was and is still in her nice ivory tower about that subject, at least she had come down a few steps, but not much.
I know it's not a huge difference, but its actually important character wise. In the Order of the Phoenix, when everyone is cleaning in Grimauld Place, Molly Weasley accidentally stumbles upon a Boggart that reveals her greatest fear. Harry and company run to her aid after they hear her screaming bloody murder and Harry finds Ron dead on thefloor. It's revealed to actually be a Boggart, Molly's greatest fear seeing her children and husband dead. It keeps switching between all her children before it transforms into Harry's dead body. This is the first moment Harry realizes that Molly considers him like a son.
I subscribed to your channel solely to wait for this video. But i've liked some of your other videos so you just earned yourself a permanent subscriber!
cinefix is legitimately one of the best channels on YT. They're the only channel with 'Top 10' lists that actually put a lot of thought and effort into them.
I really hate the changes to five. They're thematically ludicrous. I love the book so, so much. It is about growing up and really is the only book to. It focuses so much on Harry passing classes, tests and finding an occupation. It sounds boring but adds so much depth because it's so relatable. The movie is themeless and certainly plotless making it not worth anything.
Just discovered this video series this morning and love it. I have a suggestion for a future installment: Fletch. I've read both the book and seen the classic Chevy Chase movie, and there are definitely some major differences between the book and film. This would be a perfect addition to this video series. Love what you guys have done so far!
To be honest.... I have no memories of these 2 in films but the book is still in my mind. Why didn't u show that Dumbledore in the movies were being way more crazy and hot-headed (Which is why i love Richard Harris's version more, RIP), and Department of Mysteries was way way way better in the book?
Yeah tbh that's the biggest and worst cut they did from book 5.. it was such a cool and vast area it's like its own world within the wizarding world, while in the film they just chase through like 3 rooms with less than half the fighting and tension
Yeah they missed a ton of stuff there. Was probably cut due to special effects budget. Plus in a way it did n9t add much to the story line, but did add to the tension of getting lost forever there
THANK YOU!! The cutting of Neville's character arc hurts my soul! It was my least favorite book, but I'll go back to read that one scene like once a month I love it and hate it so much!
Does anyone else here appreciate the fact that, instead of it being Mad-Eye that gives Harry the photo like in the book, it's Sirius that does it in the movie? Even if it was done to make up for lost time in Goblet of Fire, I think Sirius deserves that honor more than Mad-Eye Moody did.
why no mention of harry's breakdown in dumbledore's office? that moment is heart-wrenching, but also seriously satisfying as it had been years coming. i was gutted they didn't include it in the movie, i was waiting for it!
There is one thing hardly anyone mentions when talking about the differences, and understandably so since it doesn't really impact the plot, which is the wierd and totally awesome shit they see in the department of mysteries. The unspeakables working there, the brains, the time room and so much more. It's fascinating to see that there is actual research into different types of magic going on.
One part that is actually really important from that part of the book is that they accidentally destroy all the time turners. I've heard so many people going "Why didn't they just go back in time and just shoot Voldermort?" but that wasn't an opinion since they all got wrecked.
to me one of the biggest differences (after the Christmas at the Closed Ward, of course), was the whole scene after the fight at the ministry. Dumbledore's explanation on Harry's connection with Voldemort, and how the prophecy plays into all of it. I know that it probably wouldn't have made for great movie content, but it would've made the rest of the story so much clearer if something along those lines had been in there.
the books made such an impact om me that the movies are awful in comparison. Can barely remember anything about the movies., whereas I read the entire book series at least once a year. The movies didn't have peeves for christ sake!
I agree! personally I passionately hate Harry Potter 7 part 2 and hate even more all the love it gets. I've read it 9 times so seeing them crap on the book with things like Voldemort slapping Harry, Voldemort turning into paper (?), omitting the great hall battle including McGonagall and Kingsley vs. Voldemort (what the heck?#?!), not having Mrs. Weasley shout, "Not my daughter, you bitch" as loud as humanly possible and worst of all omitting the central theme of love!!!! It's stated in the first book and movie, fifth book and movie but forgotten here! He literally sacrifices himself and Voldemort's spells don't work but in the movie he wins in a laughable duel. ugh the movies are so not great
In all honesty, the only thing I dislike about 7 P2 is the way Voldemort dies. I think even in a movie context, it would have been more powerful for him to simply fall to his death after a tense moment of quiet (the moment of quiet being solely for the dramatic suspense that would better fit the theater).
So somebody should fix the caption at 9:45 to say "in St. Mungo's," as in the name of the hospital they see Neville at... also "Christmas on the Closed Ward" is the name of a chapter at 10:01
If you guys want, you can also look at The Dom's Lost in Adaptation. He shows the differences from the books and movies and tells why he likes the books more.
One of the things I really like about this series is that they discuss the differences, but generally don't judge them one way or the other. It's informative and entertaining, and doesn't force their opinions on you. Most people can't seem to do this without injecting their opinion into it, and that often makes it seem biased one way or the other.
puckerings I don't mind opinions at all, especially that a majority of the viewers of this kind of video are readers of the series who want justice for what they love. You seem to like that they don't judge as much as other youtubers do, ok, but my point is that it's not very informative AND is lukewarm opinion-wise, so the result is very blah.
I knew it. Knowing him from Doctor Who, how brilliant he was there, makes his performance in GoF even more embarassing. Even in this little montage in this video, I kept thinking "Wha..? Do you wanna kiss your daddy now for some reason?" I´m sorry, but if you really think, the guy playing Barty Crouch´s son gave a really convincing and captivating performance, go watch Doctor Who, series 2-4!
+ChanCeNecK It's pretty well-known that virtually none of the famous adult actors took the HP movies the slightest bit seriously. Especially the villains. They knew they had free license to ham it up shamelessly, and were practically competing to see who could chew the most scenery. To a certain extent, Tenant deserves some credit for chewing so much with relatively little screen time.
Everyone will hate me for this but.... they should remake the Harry Potter franchise into a series, leaving out no detail, making it a perfect adaptation from book to screen. Although, maybe wait a few years till everyone's forgotten about harry potter.
Considering how the movies we have turned out in length just with what was cut, you could potentially have a 7 films at 6 hours per film (which no theater would logically carry) or a Hobbit treatment of anywhere between 14-21 movies covering the 7 books. That is a spell for disaster for a movie series! Adaptations have to trim their source material like this and present the focus and items related to the focus Ain the best way possible. I love the analysis these guys are doing. Another reviewer called The Dom is looking at the films, too, but complains about what gets removed without looking at the focus of how adaptation really works.
Kye Dysarthria "you could potentially have a 7 films at 6 hours per film (which no theater would logically carry) or a Hobbit treatment of anywhere between 14-21 movies" So no, I'm pretty sure he didn't get it. As for whether a TV series could be perfectly adaptable is arguable. It is definitely possible. Especially if they make it 1 book = 1 Season of 22 episodes 45-60 mins long. That's potentially 22 hours per season ( the first seasons would be shorter, and the later ones longer to accommodate for the books). How accurately they stick to the storylines and the characters is really up to the director, but if they do anything near the existing movies, it'll be good enough.
No it is not when it comes to adapting novels like harry potter you're going to have to make change's and leave some stuff out if you don't the adaptation will fail.
The 5th book was probably my favorite, and my least favorite film adaptation. I think the biggest thing they missed, which I feel was conveyed by the book though not in so many words, was the thing about the mirror at the end: Harry could've used it to figure out Sirius wasn't actually in any danger, and In the book, I think he realizes this, but not so in the movie.
I'm so happy you mentioned the christmas break/st. mungo's stuff cuz it really was a freaking crime!! I can't wait to see what you do to movie 6 tho because while I get most of the cuts in the movies up until then, movie 6 is a fucking travesty and gets rid of SO MUCH necessary plot stuff to make way for romcom sideline bullshit.
You know, it’s these videos that make me realize how hard it is to actually adapt a book like this into a screenplay. It’s not just a matter of cutting things out for runtime. It’s balancing out themes and characters and streamlining it to make it complete and make sense in its own right. I respect the screenwriters much more after this.
It means Dumbledore doesn't go "HARRYDIDYAPUTCHARNAMEINTHEGOBLITOFFAR" that always made me laugh, because it's so ridiculous the way he says it. That is something I noticed almost immediately though, what an odd thing to change.
After marathoning the first four films last Saturday, I really appreciate how the films continue to present Neville's evolution as a possible chosen one.
It always drove me nuts in the Goblet of Fire film that Fudge announces himself as Minster for Magic at the world cup. Am I wrong or is it the Minister OF Magic???
How messed up is it that the same guy who tortured Neville's parents was teaching at the school and performed the same cruciatus curse on a spider RIGHT IN FRONT OF HIM! That's so beyond fucked up
I've heard that with his eyes being red it was hard to see any emotion in his eyes, which to me seems perfectly fitting for Voldemort but meh. Also I'm not sure if this is the actual reason.
Mike Newell, the director of _Goblet of Fire_ wanted his eyes blue as he believed red could not convey emotion. David Yates kept that in for consistency although he allowed Voldemort to have a normal tongue in his movies (Voldemort had a split snake-tongue in Goblet)
I am glad you guys pointed out this isn't a one for one difference but a general difference in story's and how they played out. I am also glad you guys didn't fall off the face of the earth. Your difference between the book and the movie of The Martian has been my favorite.
Bout time knuckleheads. And what...December we'll finally get Harry Potter and the Half blood Hallows? Shaking my f-cking head. You see that bullshit↑ you made me do? Why was i compelled I to censor my words for your comment section...?
Unless the writers are *serious* Potterheads with photographic memories, these have to take a long time to edit and compile, especially with each book after Azkaban being 600+ pages. And it's not like these are the only projects the channel is working on...
Not to mention Umbridge was basically grinding Harry down through the whole year for spreading 'dissent' in the school. I'd like to know if the ban got lifted after it became apparent that Umbridge was a psycho and Fudge was basically useless.
The fifth movie is my favorite out of all of them. I think the movies did a much better job than the books in telling stuff that actually mattered and getting me interested in what was going on.
I agree. The book is about becoming an adult and transitioning from school to an independent life which was so relatable. It's not about love!! On the other hand, in Deathly Hallows Harry essentially defeats Voldemort while in the movie he... idek. Deathly Hallows is easily the worst adaptation imo
Agree. Because it was the last one, Part 2 was the biggest disappointment. EVerything else could have been forgotten if the Hallows, the horcruxes, the lessons about death and love, the character developements and Voldemort's death had been well written and executed.
oh man the Neville omission was such a crime! I mean there was so much content in the books that something inevitability was going to be cut out, but that was such a crucial aspect of Neville's character development in the book. When Neville finds out that Bellatrix is out of prison in the books it's like the complete turning point for Neville, he basically becomes the badass of the series from that point on making rapid progress in in the DA lessons and becoming the leader of DA by the 7th book. Maybe it's just that Neville was such a superior character that he would have overshadowed Harry to some extent, but they did his character development a disservice in this movie
Specially considering Neville's actual importance to the plot (namely, that all it would have taken would have been a mental coin toss from Voldemort for _him_ to be the actual protagonist of the story).
exactly, and I think that plot point was what the movies were trying to avoid, because it kinda diminishes the whole "chosen one" angle of Harry if there's another character with the exact same qualities.
honestly speaking, i had a friend who had never read any HP book, but had seen all the movies; didnt actually know that the prophecy could have pointed out to Neville as well.
But that's HOW he was the Chosen One. Voldemort CHOSE him
The point is, that everything could have been different, if Snake Face went after Longbottoms.
The lost of Peeves is also sad. I really love the moment when as the twins break out they scream "Give Her hell, peeves." and the poltergeist tips his hat to them.
HARRY DIDJA PUT YA NAME IN TEH GOBLET OF FYAH!
Alex Everett-last lol
Alex Everett-last lol
Alex Everett-last DUMBLEDOR SAID CALMLY
C&*():(&4$$55
he asked calmly
Why do I have to wait for part 3; I already did my waiting, 12 years of it, in Azkaban!
Underrated comment.
Ha!
Sometimes you gotta unleash caps lock.
Someone's been watching The Dom.
+Liam Moffat are you Sirius?
In my not-so-humble- opinion, Goblet of Fire was the crux, the lynchpin of the series- specifically in the graveyard. When Harry makes the choice to get up from behind where he was crouched, and decides to face Voldemort head-on, that is THE MOMENT in the whole series. Everything hangs on his decision to get up and fight.
And I love that moment. That's where I burst into tears- book and movie both.
That's my favorite moment in the movie
Yeap, it's also my favourite one.
Yes! It defines his choice at the end of 5 to fight Voldemort after hearing the prophecy, instead of ignoring it. The movies underplay that big time.
agreed!
It's when things changed, the series became less about the fun and whimsy of this magical world, and more about stopping a terrible evil, becoming more action oriented. I honestly love the change, as the first three movies feel completely different from the others, but it still fits within the context of the story. It's rather genius.
Can't believe you missed out on pointing out the difference in how Dumbledore reacted to Harry entering the tournament.
IKR, that was major.
Dumbledore is way more crazy in the movies than in the book just in general
HARRYDIJAPUCHANAMEINDAGOBLETOFIYA
what happened?
UPRlSlNGG In the book he asks Harry very calmly "Did you put your name in the Goblet of Fire?". In the movie he storms up to him asking "HARRY DID YOU PUT YOUR NAME IN THE GOBLET OF FIRE?!".
I wish they would have included the Weasley's picking up Harry from the Dursley's in the movie. That was probably the funniest moment in the book. Arthur blasting his way out of the boarded up fireplace and the Dursley family all in their nicest suits covered in dust. And Uncle Vernon throwing things at Arthur. And Petunia yanking on Dudley's giant tongue after his fat ass ate that candy Fred dropped. So damn funny.
Fred......
Lol i bought all seven books for first time and iam reading them and iam reading fourth one i read 105 pages in a hour and a half and I remember reading that part
The part in the Department of Mysteries is so much cooler and weirder in the book.
Yeah, it's dumb how they made a generic action movie out of it. The Department of Mysteries was when the book got good for me (even though it's at the very end)
I know, that's what made the climax of the book great.
+Will Higgins Ikr, and the battle between Dumbledore and Voldemort was just great!
+Michael Alvarado Yes it was, and the moving statues that held down Harry and Bellatrix where some best of it.
+Will Higgins "Dumbledore, you- will need to tell me exactly- the fountain of Magical Brethren- what happened?"
"the movie also skimps on some detail of the quidditch world cup" ... you mean like... the entire match lol
That's obvosuly gunna get cut cause that's purley fan service
@@trisin The director's cut isn't the theatrical release cut, in which the match was pretty much cut… asshole.
And the Twins bet with Bagman. How the heck did they guess that Ireland would win, but Krum would get the snitch?
Yeah, if they keeped the scene it would also have been pretty dark as it was pretty bloody scene
The best part of the OotP book was Harry completely trashing Dumbledore's office in a huge emotional outburst after the end of a really fucking bad year and Sirius death.
Man the movies were so unrespectful to Sirius and his relationship with Harry, he´s actually so much more present and supportive, it makes you feel the family love Harry never had. And you missed Harry´s grief after Sirius dies, the long talk they had in Albus´s office a whole morning and in between all the things from the office Harry destroyed in a rage attack he had while struggling with realising Sirius was death and Albus being alright with Harry tearing apart his precious objects. It was very harsh on the book. In the movie is not like that at all. Also as a fun thing that Gilderoy Lockhart appears on the Mental Asylum when visting Neville parents, and he´s out of his mind af.
Movies 4 and 5 are the absolute WORST in the series, while books 4 and 5 are the best for that exact reason. There was very little to no fan service left in the 4th and 5th movies. A mind boggling decision seeing as how the main demographic watching the movies would be PEOPLE WHO HAVE READ THE BOOKS.
Radcliffe supposedly was drunk in many scenes he did... why not go ahead and let him loose destroying Dumbledore's office?
The only acknowledgment of Gilderoy's fate is the "WHO AM I?" Flourish and Blotts scene at the end of Year 2.
The 4 book moments from Year 4 that I missed the most was: *1)* The Dursleys. *2)* The actual Quidditch World Cup match. *3)* Barty Crouch Jr.'s explanation of how he escaped Azkaban with his mother's help, and *4)* Those 3 words that should have capped Albus' eulogy: "Remember Cedric Diggory", which could have EASILY been added in AR as the camera panned up to the Great Hall ceiling. Anyway.... everyone has their opinions, but for me, those were the moments.
You forgot how we not only see Neville's parents in St. Mungos (I believe they cut St. Mungos because it sounds like a racial slur) But also the fate of professor Lockhart
After having his mind changed completely by Ron's broken wand, it was clear that using a broken wand was more dangerous than borrowing another person's wand, because the wand would change loyalty if you overpowered the other wizard, Ron got lucky when he only got sick trying to use the wand, he could have been mentally handicapped the rest of his life, which is why by breaking the elder wand Harry makes sure no one can use it again
Let's just say I wouldn't want to be a wizard doctor even if they are paid as much as real doctors
Yeah he breaks it. Without repairing his old wand. I can deal with him breaking it but really? What are we meant to assume he just got Ollivander to make another one? It was a brilliant scene in the book because it shows Harry staying as normal as he can despite who he could be.
TheDark4light that and again broken wands are not usable they make that clear in the book, Ollivander couldn't make a wand made by death, a wand everyone would kill over for centuries, so Harry does the only reasonable thing he breaks it, making sure no one else could use it
As for his old wand who's to say he doesn't just take a feather from Fauxes the Phoenix and have Ollivander make another wand? Ron didn't get his wand fixed he got a new one and never complained about it feeling wrong, the wand chooses the wizard therefor fixing broken wands is impossible because they are sentient to the point that they choose the wizard
I think a major problem with these adaptations was that the movies were being made while the books were still being written, meaning the screenwriters and directors didn't know what would and what wouldn't be important.
@@trisin What Rubberman means is that several of the films had been made or were in process before book 7 was published, and Jo herself says she was extremely secretive about how it would play out. Other reviewers, both serious and YT plebes like Cinemafix, have commented on the same thing.
Actually, JK Rowling was in constant contact with screenwriter Steve Kloves and did let the creative team know what would be important. For example, they were gonna cut Kreacher out of movie 5 (the only movie Kloves didn't write btw) but she told them he had to be in it because he'd be important later. These movies are different from the books simply because every movie adaptation is different from the books. I'm not saying you fall under this, but a lot of book readers can't seem to grasp that it's gonna be different, and that's ok that it is.
What about Dumbledore "calmly" pushing Harry against the wall and shouting at him
I hate Michael gambon as dumbledore
Me too. Richard Harris was like a x10000 times better
HARRY DID YA PUT YER NAME IN THE GOBLET OF FIYAH!
Neither Gambon nor Harris was a good Dumbledore. Gambon was a little too over the top, and just has a totally different personality than the Dumbledore of the books. And Harris was too subdued, lacking any sort of gravitas, instead giving Dumbledore an aura of "I'm gonna drop dead any moment, and even speaking is a struggle for me." The Dumbledore of the books was described as a much more animated character than Harris's. But overall, I'm more willing to accept Gambon's stronger interpretation of the character rather than Harris's. Can you even imagine Harris dueling Voldemort in book 5??
Yes I can. Harris never had the chance to play the more furious side of Dumbledore, he acted true to the source material, in Book 1 and 2 Dumbledore was that calm. Nevertheless, he was never described like how Gambon played him. Even when angry, it was more of a tranquil fury, never shouting like an idiot. I think Harris would have nailed that part.
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, the year of no haircuts
The year they actually looked handsome.
To Tell You The truth, i like more The hairstyle Harry has in movies 1, 2 And 4
Ikr
The order of the phoenix movie is a crime. It is the second shortest movie and excludes so much cool stuff from the book. And its not like the stuff they left out was because they couldn't fit it in. It would have been easy to show them at St Mungos, or extend the sequence in the department of mysteries etc etc etc
Borat Sagdiyev yes!!!
And Harry thrashing Dumbledore's office...
I hate the fact that marietta edgecomb wasn’t exist in the movie and made cho the villain instead
Borat Sagdiyev the 5th movie was the the worst movie of then all, and it is because of that, that the 7th did not acomplish wath it should have done, i honestly can not forgiven then for let doby out of the movie and for neglet Nevels family story. I went and read the book because i felt that there were more to the story. But you can't make a perfect adaptation.
jamiebellwolf they did a fantastic job, but u have to admit that they could have done a better job at it. As an exemple look at the lord of the rings adaptation, it is diffrent from the books but it was great, thougth they were 3 ours movies.
also when cleaning headquarters they find the locket, not knowing it was a horcrux at the time!!!
Tayla Piasente save the juice for later!
Also in book 6 Harry actually handles the...…………………...
Sorry, more juice.
Actually, I think it's mentioned it was red light that hit Sirius in the department of mysteries, suggesting a stunner rather than a killing curse which is green. Going through the veil meant his death but if he hadn't fallen through, he might have been okay. In the film, they just make it green and clearer that Belatrix killed him.
While a Stunning Spell is red, its not the only spell of that color. Knowing Bellatrix Lestrange, I think it is more likely that she would cast a Cruciatus Curse than a stunner, even if she and Sirius were cousins. Another possibility would be the Disarming Charm, which is said to have a Scarlet color.
Eilidh Macleod I'm pretty sure, that she used a Cruciatus Charm
I whipped out my book to check.
It says Bellatrix fired a jet of red light which Sirius easily evaded and he taunted her to do better. Bellatrix's "second jet of light" hit Sirius. It can easliy be assumed it was another red jet (which I, too, do) but it could be any colour.
As to which spell she used, we can only assume it wasn't a green jet symbolising Avada Kedavra.
The only indication is that Sirius' "eyes widened in chock" and he had a "look of mingled fear and surprise" on his face.
Stupefy (as I see it) doesn't allow the target to show any emotions, they just drop unconcious. Who knows? Hagrid could take a few without falling. Maybe Sirius was just so resiliant he could stay concious (albeit not in control of his body) for the duration of him falling backwards into the veil.
In short: All we know is that she used a jet of light. Colour presumably red.
Have a nice day.
Finally! I was worried you weren't gonna continue this!
me too
I know right hahaha
so do I
White American Male hey, money is money
+Zoey StarLady lemme get yo kik
Don't forget about the vicious flying brains that attack Ron
I was so mad that they left out the scene where Harry, Fred, and George beat the ever-living hell out of Malfoy. Also can't wait to hear the differences in Half-Blood prince where literally every important detail about Voldemort's past is replaced by teen romance.
For a second I thought the title was a typo
Then I remembered this series existed
Sparky Studio awh, i don't know about whatever that is. ;^;
Lol same
AxelF r/woosh
Glad you've continued this and can't wait to see the last episode!
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Hallows
What's interesting about the book version is that Crouch Jr's plan was for Neville to help Harry but Harry ends up not asking him which means Dobby gets roped in craftily. So the movie basically has the original plan work. I kind of liked that. Very simple and effective.
HARRY DID YE PUT YER NAME IN THE GOBLIT OF FIYAH
Lol so true tho
said dumbledore *calmly*
Minion Gaming Clash Royale
TheDiego908 Nope, Mr.Crouch's son did while using the Polyjuice Potion to look like Professor Moody
HAHAHAHHAHA
How dare you not mention Peeves, he was insanely important to the plot!
Yeah!
He told Albus Percival Wulfric Brian Dumbledore about Sirius (don't know his middle name/names) Black entering the castle unauthorized
YES!!!!!!!!!! Someone finally agrees with me that Neville Longbottom got shorted in the fifth film. The character is so much more because of the books. They REALLY should have put this in the film so those that don't read the books will have even that much more... well everything for Neville. Okay that's all. Can't wait for part three. This has been great so far, thank-you for doing this in such a nice way. - "Always" devoted
_"Hermione Bikini Centerfold"_
The hell? Where can I get a copy of that issue of The Quibbler? I need it for... research.
AND NOTHING ABOUT THE PROPHECY????? You get mad about the absence of the hospital scene with Neville, but you don't worry about the prophecy??? (I'm not that upset, I'm just surprised)
Why you are bitching so much about the prophecy? That even Rowling ditched that apart as well because she was a pussy and not wanted to her hero become a murder, so she created the Horcrux and the Wand Ex Machina to justified Harry not becoming a murder.
TheKeyser94 Stop using feminine words to try and insult women. There's nothing inherently wrong with bitches and pussies. And Jo's interpretation of prophecies is amazing, because they only are self-fulfilling ones.
Ganychan No her interpretation is pure wish-fulfilment, nothing more, nothing less, she was afraid, she had no guts, she should have ended what she had began, not give excuses for the character not to have character development, that story would have ended much better if Harry actually had become a killer.
TheKeyser94 "That story would have ended much better if Harry had become a killer". No. Sometimes courage and "having guts" is about not killing and being the better person while trying to give the one who hurt you the opportunity to repent.
Ganychan No, that isn't being brave, that is playing safe, because you are fucking afraid of actually doing something new or innovative, speak about a controversial subject, Rowling was and is still in her nice ivory tower about that subject, at least she had come down a few steps, but not much.
I know it's not a huge difference, but its actually important character wise. In the Order of the Phoenix, when everyone is cleaning in Grimauld Place, Molly Weasley accidentally stumbles upon a Boggart that reveals her greatest fear. Harry and company run to her aid after they hear her screaming bloody murder and Harry finds Ron dead on thefloor. It's revealed to actually be a Boggart, Molly's greatest fear seeing her children and husband dead. It keeps switching between all her children before it transforms into Harry's dead body. This is the first moment Harry realizes that Molly considers him like a son.
I subscribed to your channel solely to wait for this video. But i've liked some of your other videos so you just earned yourself a permanent subscriber!
cinefix is legitimately one of the best channels on YT. They're the only channel with 'Top 10' lists that actually put a lot of thought and effort into them.
Hurray! Welcome to the family!
Nice Deconstruction of the differences, I've really under though the reasons behind the changes except time restraints until now.
I really hate the changes to five. They're thematically ludicrous. I love the book so, so much. It is about growing up and really is the only book to. It focuses so much on Harry passing classes, tests and finding an occupation. It sounds boring but adds so much depth because it's so relatable. The movie is themeless and certainly plotless making it not worth anything.
Just discovered this video series this morning and love it. I have a suggestion for a future installment: Fletch. I've read both the book and seen the classic Chevy Chase movie, and there are definitely some major differences between the book and film. This would be a perfect addition to this video series. Love what you guys have done so far!
To be honest.... I have no memories of these 2 in films but the book is still in my mind. Why didn't u show that Dumbledore in the movies were being way more crazy and hot-headed (Which is why i love Richard Harris's version more, RIP), and Department of Mysteries was way way way better in the book?
Yeah tbh that's the biggest and worst cut they did from book 5.. it was such a cool and vast area it's like its own world within the wizarding world, while in the film they just chase through like 3 rooms with less than half the fighting and tension
Yeah they missed a ton of stuff there. Was probably cut due to special effects budget. Plus in a way it did n9t add much to the story line, but did add to the tension of getting lost forever there
Vernon Dursley: Boy, are you listening to the news again?
Harry: yes, well it changes everyday you see.
Haha one of my favorite lines in the books.
THANK YOU!! The cutting of Neville's character arc hurts my soul! It was my least favorite book, but I'll go back to read that one scene like once a month I love it and hate it so much!
Does anyone else here appreciate the fact that, instead of it being Mad-Eye that gives Harry the photo like in the book, it's Sirius that does it in the movie? Even if it was done to make up for lost time in Goblet of Fire, I think Sirius deserves that honor more than Mad-Eye Moody did.
but it creates the opposite effect. in the book, Harry hates seeing that photo, its NOT a loving reminiscent moment
@@86upsmaya exactly!
why no mention of harry's breakdown in dumbledore's office? that moment is heart-wrenching, but also seriously satisfying as it had been years coming. i was gutted they didn't include it in the movie, i was waiting for it!
And don't forget that they basically cut out Tonk's and Remus' relationship
There is one thing hardly anyone mentions when talking about the differences, and understandably so since it doesn't really impact the plot, which is the wierd and totally awesome shit they see in the department of mysteries. The unspeakables working there, the brains, the time room and so much more. It's fascinating to see that there is actual research into different types of magic going on.
One part that is actually really important from that part of the book is that they accidentally destroy all the time turners. I've heard so many people going "Why didn't they just go back in time and just shoot Voldermort?" but that wasn't an opinion since they all got wrecked.
to me one of the biggest differences (after the Christmas at the Closed Ward, of course), was the whole scene after the fight at the ministry. Dumbledore's explanation on Harry's connection with Voldemort, and how the prophecy plays into all of it.
I know that it probably wouldn't have made for great movie content, but it would've made the rest of the story so much clearer if something along those lines had been in there.
the books made such an impact om me that the movies are awful in comparison. Can barely remember anything about the movies., whereas I read the entire book series at least once a year. The movies didn't have peeves for christ sake!
I think scenes with Rik Mayall's Peeves were actually shot for the first movie, but were cut.
I agree! personally I passionately hate Harry Potter 7 part 2 and hate even more all the love it gets. I've read it 9 times so seeing them crap on the book with things like Voldemort slapping Harry, Voldemort turning into paper (?), omitting the great hall battle including McGonagall and Kingsley vs. Voldemort (what the heck?#?!), not having Mrs. Weasley shout, "Not my daughter, you bitch" as loud as humanly possible and worst of all omitting the central theme of love!!!! It's stated in the first book and movie, fifth book and movie but forgotten here! He literally sacrifices himself and Voldemort's spells don't work but in the movie he wins in a laughable duel. ugh the movies are so not great
In all honesty, the only thing I dislike about 7 P2 is the way Voldemort dies. I think even in a movie context, it would have been more powerful for him to simply fall to his death after a tense moment of quiet (the moment of quiet being solely for the dramatic suspense that would better fit the theater).
sivad parks The scene that made me really angry, was when Harry just snapped the Elderwand without repairing his own.
+Blue Sparx exactly, that he died so "normally" i.e. without bursting into ashes matched the series themes greatly.
5:07 When Harry wrote Sirius' name on the letter, I was thinking "But wouldn't he write Padfoot for secrecy?"
So somebody should fix the caption at 9:45 to say "in St. Mungo's," as in the name of the hospital they see Neville at...
also "Christmas on the Closed Ward" is the name of a chapter at 10:01
First time I watch one of these videos... the "character reference photos" are freaking amazing in a jarring, horrible way. I love it.
If you guys want, you can also look at The Dom's Lost in Adaptation. He shows the differences from the books and movies and tells why he likes the books more.
One of the things I really like about this series is that they discuss the differences, but generally don't judge them one way or the other. It's informative and entertaining, and doesn't force their opinions on you. Most people can't seem to do this without injecting their opinion into it, and that often makes it seem biased one way or the other.
They were putting their own opinions in it though, and missing out on huge changes, so it loses value in information.
At times they do, yes, but far less so than most movie channels.
puckerings I don't mind opinions at all, especially that a majority of the viewers of this kind of video are readers of the series who want justice for what they love. You seem to like that they don't judge as much as other youtubers do, ok, but my point is that it's not very informative AND is lukewarm opinion-wise, so the result is very blah.
"...and tells why he likes the books more"
Instantly lost all interest.
I had totally forgotten you where doing this, so I when I saa it (not expecting it) I got really excited. This is awesome!
I was not prepared to see David Tennant. Totally that the Tenth was in the movie.
Allons-y!
Never watch Jessica Jones unless you're willing to risk having Ten ruined forever.
He was amazing in Jessica Jons, he littely mad ethe show and showed that netflix had the best villains.
I knew it. Knowing him from Doctor Who, how brilliant he was there, makes his performance in GoF even more embarassing. Even in this little montage in this video, I kept thinking "Wha..? Do you wanna kiss your daddy now for some reason?"
I´m sorry, but if you really think, the guy playing Barty Crouch´s son gave a really convincing and captivating performance, go watch Doctor Who, series 2-4!
+ChanCeNecK It's pretty well-known that virtually none of the famous adult actors took the HP movies the slightest bit seriously. Especially the villains. They knew they had free license to ham it up shamelessly, and were practically competing to see who could chew the most scenery. To a certain extent, Tenant deserves some credit for chewing so much with relatively little screen time.
Quite agree - Skipping the Christmas scene with Neville and his parents pissed me off no end!!!
Everyone will hate me for this but....
they should remake the Harry Potter franchise into a series, leaving out no detail, making it a perfect adaptation from book to screen. Although, maybe wait a few years till everyone's forgotten about harry potter.
Considering how the movies we have turned out in length just with what was cut, you could potentially have a 7 films at 6 hours per film (which no theater would logically carry) or a Hobbit treatment of anywhere between 14-21 movies covering the 7 books. That is a spell for disaster for a movie series!
Adaptations have to trim their source material like this and present the focus and items related to the focus Ain the best way possible. I love the analysis these guys are doing. Another reviewer called The Dom is looking at the films, too, but complains about what gets removed without looking at the focus of how adaptation really works.
RedKingdomWarrior Sorry to cut you short, but perhaps I didn't make it clear in my comment, and I apologize, but I meant television series.
He knows he is just saying whether it be a movie or tv harry potter will never be a perfect adaptation.
Kye Dysarthria "you could potentially have a 7 films at 6 hours per film (which no theater would logically carry) or a Hobbit treatment of anywhere between 14-21 movies"
So no, I'm pretty sure he didn't get it.
As for whether a TV series could be perfectly adaptable is arguable. It is definitely possible. Especially if they make it 1 book = 1 Season of 22 episodes 45-60 mins long. That's potentially 22 hours per season ( the first seasons would be shorter, and the later ones longer to accommodate for the books). How accurately they stick to the storylines and the characters is really up to the director, but if they do anything near the existing movies, it'll be good enough.
No it is not when it comes to adapting novels like harry potter you're going to have to make change's and leave some stuff out if you don't the adaptation will fail.
Wow! You managed to do a comparison without digging too much on the movie OR the book! Talk about refreshing!
The 5th book was probably my favorite, and my least favorite film adaptation. I think the biggest thing they missed, which I feel was conveyed by the book though not in so many words, was the thing about the mirror at the end: Harry could've used it to figure out Sirius wasn't actually in any danger, and In the book, I think he realizes this, but not so in the movie.
Wow, that "That's what she said!" totally got me. Spewed apple juice all over the carpet, well played!
Part 3: Harry uses an unforgiveable curse, which should send him to Azkaban.
They basically say fuck it to that law in book 7 anyway.
Truth.
So does McGonnagall. Like +Behemothokun said, it's wartime, fuck Unforgivable.
Voldy legalised the unforgivables in Deathly Hallows, so technically he didn't break a law in book 7.
Shadow Enigma was that actually detailed in the books I don’t remember that (not saying your wrong and it would definitely make sense)
FINALLY!!! I've been craving this video!
I'm so happy you mentioned the christmas break/st. mungo's stuff cuz it really was a freaking crime!! I can't wait to see what you do to movie 6 tho because while I get most of the cuts in the movies up until then, movie 6 is a fucking travesty and gets rid of SO MUCH necessary plot stuff to make way for romcom sideline bullshit.
You know, it’s these videos that make me realize how hard it is to actually adapt a book like this into a screenplay. It’s not just a matter of cutting things out for runtime. It’s balancing out themes and characters and streamlining it to make it complete and make sense in its own right. I respect the screenwriters much more after this.
J.k. Rowling should write a book on voldemorts life
Read book 6.
Dowling needs to take a break from writing and focus on what it truly means to be an Englishwoman.
Wanna find out if he was gay?
Alpha Sierra I mean he chases after a younger boy throughout the series
What a birthday present to me!!! Thanks CineFix!!
*Calmly* If ur a true potterhead, u know what this means
It means Dumbledore doesn't go "HARRYDIDYAPUTCHARNAMEINTHEGOBLITOFFAR" that always made me laugh, because it's so ridiculous the way he says it. That is something I noticed almost immediately though, what an odd thing to change.
Avery in the book, "calmly" in the movie "HARRY! DID YOU PUT YER NAME IN THE GOBLET OF FIYA????"
HARRYDIDYOUPUTYERNAMEINTHAGOBLETOFFIYA
Yeppppp
HARRY!DIDYAPUTYANAMEINDAGOBLETOFFIYA?
After marathoning the first four films last Saturday, I really appreciate how the films continue to present Neville's evolution as a possible chosen one.
IT'S NOT SPEW!! IT'S S.P.E.W.!!
I love your use of that ancient Czech film, the one about the Golem
It always drove me nuts in the Goblet of Fire film that Fudge announces himself as Minster for Magic at the world cup. Am I wrong or is it the Minister OF Magic???
no you're right. I've always thought for sounded classier but since it's the only time used it sounds out of place.
Minister of Magic is in the american books, while Minister _for_ Magic is the original british version.
Dreadjaws But they say of in the movies... why change it in the first place???
sivad parks They also localize those things in the movies.
Also in the books it's Dobby who tells Harry about the room of requirements instead of Neville
How messed up is it that the same guy who tortured Neville's parents was teaching at the school and performed the same cruciatus curse on a spider RIGHT IN FRONT OF HIM! That's so beyond fucked up
It was bellatrix lestrange that tortured neville's parents.
Cabaret Macabre along with Barty Crouch Jr. , Rodolpus and Rabastan Lestrange
See you guys next year when they release the last part.
You forgot how they left out Bertha Jorkins
This is perfect, as I am going through the HP series book right now. So I'm super stoked this happened.
ON WITH THE VIEWING!
wait... aren't voldemort's eyes red? why did they change that in the movie??!!
Squidlord to make him more human like
Which is dumb af.
Red eyes are edgy and detract from the seriousness of antagonists
I've heard that with his eyes being red it was hard to see any emotion in his eyes, which to me seems perfectly fitting for Voldemort but meh. Also I'm not sure if this is the actual reason.
Mike Newell, the director of _Goblet of Fire_ wanted his eyes blue as he believed red could not convey emotion. David Yates kept that in for consistency although he allowed Voldemort to have a normal tongue in his movies (Voldemort had a split snake-tongue in Goblet)
Do the Thing and Who Goes There! It'll be AMAZING!
do kick ass 2 what's the difference or the walking dead season 4
kickass is a book?
Yep, they even did a video of ot
I am glad you guys pointed out this isn't a one for one difference but a general difference in story's and how they played out. I am also glad you guys didn't fall off the face of the earth. Your difference between the book and the movie of The Martian has been my favorite.
Bout time knuckleheads. And what...December we'll finally get Harry Potter and the Half blood Hallows?
Shaking my f-cking head.
You see that bullshit↑ you made me do? Why was i compelled I to censor my words for your comment section...?
Because someone put an imperius curse on you
Unless the writers are *serious* Potterheads with photographic memories, these have to take a long time to edit and compile, especially with each book after Azkaban being 600+ pages. And it's not like these are the only projects the channel is working on...
Calm down, kiddo. You're getting these videos FOR FREE.
Araxie Rose why? Everyone else gets to be cunty on youtube. I'm just following suit.
Yes, strip away your individuality and conform!
Omg thanks so much for making this!!! I was waiting for years hahahah!!!
Can you guys do Civil War Comics vs the movie
do one on dune (1984)!!!!
that would be a long video XD
Felipe Leguer have your hear of the unmade jodorowsky's dune?
Linkara made a video of that. More or less. But yeah, it would really take long.
FINALLY WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?!
Goblet of the phoenix what?
You- you get it, right?
woot i love you guys. these episodes are awesome
so howcome harry got a lifetime ban from quidditch? was he too good?
Spazbo4 because Umbridge was in charge and she was a slytherin in her Hogwarts days also She was the one who set the dementors on Dudley
Hamza18600 And Fred
Not to mention Umbridge was basically grinding Harry down through the whole year for spreading 'dissent' in the school. I'd like to know if the ban got lifted after it became apparent that Umbridge was a psycho and Fudge was basically useless.
I've been waiting for this for a while
I was so annoyed when they cut out so many Sirius scenes. Especially in the Goblet of fire.
this content is magical
I would suggest 'what's the diffrence... Percy Jackson'
But that' d be too easy.
Everything is diffrent
Amazing! Looking forward to part 3!
Where is the what's the difference for Game of Thrones
watch Preston Jacob's "What you are missing" Series. He does it for each episode and is somewhere at the end of season 3 now.
Pretty much a book per season. And there is a LOT of omitted material. A LOT
If people think they butchered the Harry Potter books, there's barely anything left from ASOIAF in the show.
Carlos.C especially on the sixth season lol
a
Me:reads title
Also me:visible confusion
what about the rest of the walking dead seasons?
I was waiting far too long for this
In my opinion, the fifth movie is the worst one, out of all the movie adaptations.
I think 6 was a worse adaptation because the book was great. 5 wasn't that good a book to begin with.
The fifth movie is my favorite out of all of them. I think the movies did a much better job than the books in telling stuff that actually mattered and getting me interested in what was going on.
disneydevil1 That stuff is all fine, but I never cared about the OWLs or Harry's detentions.
I agree. The book is about becoming an adult and transitioning from school to an independent life which was so relatable. It's not about love!! On the other hand, in Deathly Hallows Harry essentially defeats Voldemort while in the movie he... idek. Deathly Hallows is easily the worst adaptation imo
Agree. Because it was the last one, Part 2 was the biggest disappointment. EVerything else could have been forgotten if the Hallows, the horcruxes, the lessons about death and love, the character developements and Voldemort's death had been well written and executed.
Damn it's about time this was done finally great video!!!! :)
Although most of the film's finale is a rushed nonsensical mess, I do like the sequence with Voldemort possessing Harry better than the book version.
Damn This needs more likes.. Very well done guys!!!
Do this for the hobbit lol
Please don't make us wait so long for the next installment! i love this series!
do what's the difference of American Psycho
It's definitely on the list.
The hype is real. I love that book/film.
I'm so glad that Harry and Ron's long hair only lasted a year
We need a fourth Walking Dead episode
Such a good series of you guys