PART IV - “Privileges or Immunities” v. “Substantive Due Process” [No. 86 LECTURE]

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 авг 2024

Комментарии • 7

  • @wraithconscience
    @wraithconscience Год назад

    One interesting characteristic of Prof. Green's discourse is that he increasingly clarifies and concretizes as he goes along. If you don't understand it at first, you will. Listening to him, we might also hope the Privileges or Immunities clause would take increasing influence -- as it was originally intended to do. The use of the Equal Protection clause, while attractive, actually seems not to provide the studiest basis for key issues in our society, namely protection from violence and freedom from "laws" that destroy our Constitutional rights.

  • @2Truth4Liberty
    @2Truth4Liberty Год назад

    not taken for granted, rather, haunting since 1873
    Good summary of the reality. But to correct course after 150 years???
    Serious question - would the analysis for a "privilege or immunity" be much different than the "stand-in" substantive due process analysis?

  • @thomaszynda
    @thomaszynda Год назад

    I am a victim of a fraudulent Unlawful detainer perpetrated by my landlord who failed to submit rental debt then used as a means to evict me while myself and landlord had been participating with covid-19 rental assistance for 8-months prior to this action. She was also paid for pat of 3-day notice the day after I was physically removed from my home. In a state that has looked the other way on more than 5 million undocumented aliens in our communities. I am politically and financially disenfranchised by the State of California or California however it needs to be conveyed. my property, my job, and my home taken from me without a trial.
    regardless the ruling was and is against the law. I direct opposition to the intent of the legislature during a global pandemic to prevent further cases of covid by keeping the public housed.
    I was left for dead in the street of the greatest nation this world has ever seen.
    this is against the very fabric of this nation.
    I can jot get an attorney to help me even at 50 percent of my award.
    Fair employment and housing, California civil rights. nor attorney search networks nor private attorneys all denied jurisdiction even in the fact of direct instruction to go to a particular government agency.
    the rule of law is broken, and our way of life is slipping dangerously toward the wild, wild west! in that case I got this but until then I keep loading ammo!
    I am mad as hell I will get a remedy in one way or the wild west way!

  • @douglasbockman2772
    @douglasbockman2772 9 дней назад

    Never, ever confuse a Right with privilege. The Second Amendment is about a Right and not a privilege. Too many illiterate professors espouse that both are synonymous. The Supreme law enumerated the Right of the Second Amendment. No state or federal government has the keep and bear right, and further all gun control laws are illegal. There is even a clause in the US Constitution to remove judges for bad behavior. The ctiminal justice system in the USA operates at a worse level than the service desk at Walmart.

  • @douglasbockman2772
    @douglasbockman2772 9 дней назад

    Instead of double talk: try emphasizing the difference between Right and privilege. Or better yet grow up and learn to read English with comprehension, and fix the dysfunctional criminal justice system that operates multitiered much worse than the service desk at Walmart. Point is; hunter in prison yet?

  • @thelement3363
    @thelement3363 Год назад

    what a joke