I have this PAM512. It's simple yet elegant. Coming from having AP, Rolex Subs, I think this is a good change and I find myself wearing this watch more often then the rest due to the fact it wears so good.
Thanks Jeremythevirus Huang! If you don't mind, please click over to our site and leave a review. Our customers love to hear about the ownership experience from real owners when they are shopping for a watch. Here's the link: www.thewatchbox.com/shop/Panerai-Radiomir-1940-PAM00512.html Thanks for commenting! --Team WatchBox
Hey Tim you mentioned that this is the "ergonomic equal" of the Sub C (116610), which I have that but am interested in this and the PAM337. With a 6.5" wrist I tend not to stray more than 40mm but was thinking the 337 with a similar case to the 512 would wear closer to my Sub C because of the wire lugs. Any input as to how this watch would wear in comparison? Thanks again great videos!
+Arthur J Hi Arthur, I'm agree with your preference for the wire lugs, but at least Panerai is keeping the dial true to the company's history (6154 Angelus SF240), so it can be accommodated on that basis as long as a two-hand alternative stays in the present catalog (here's the 6154 that inspired the piece): www.vintagepanerai.com/2011/05/17/introducing-the-“actors”-of-our-2nd-book-part-2934/ Best, Tim
I have this PAM512. It's simple yet elegant. Coming from having AP, Rolex Subs, I think this is a good change and I find myself wearing this watch more often then the rest due to the fact it wears so good.
Thanks Jeremythevirus Huang! If you don't mind, please click over to our site and leave a review. Our customers love to hear about the ownership experience from real owners when they are shopping for a watch. Here's the link:
www.thewatchbox.com/shop/Panerai-Radiomir-1940-PAM00512.html
Thanks for commenting!
--Team WatchBox
Got to my house today. Thanks Tim!
fantastic review
+Jan Skorka Hi Jan, thank you, and welcome to our channel! I'll do my best to keep the reviews fun, informative, and frequent.
Best,
Tim
Hey Tim you mentioned that this is the "ergonomic equal" of the Sub C (116610), which I have that but am interested in this and the PAM337. With a 6.5" wrist I tend not to stray more than 40mm but was thinking the 337 with a similar case to the 512 would wear closer to my Sub C because of the wire lugs. Any input as to how this watch would wear in comparison? Thanks again great videos!
any more of these 42mm pans?
Tim, as always, brilliant review....
Great review. Thanks.
Хорошое часы
The sub-second dial is such a clutter, really messed up the whole dial. Also wired lugs look a lot better!
+Arthur J Hi Arthur, I'm agree with your preference for the wire lugs, but at least Panerai is keeping the dial true to the company's history (6154 Angelus SF240), so it can be accommodated on that basis as long as a two-hand alternative stays in the present catalog (here's the 6154 that inspired the piece): www.vintagepanerai.com/2011/05/17/introducing-the-“actors”-of-our-2nd-book-part-2934/
Best,
Tim