Complex Analysis 15 | Laurent Series

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 окт 2024

Комментарии • 24

  • @maxdemuynck9850
    @maxdemuynck9850 7 месяцев назад +5

    best video I've found on the topic, thanks!

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  7 месяцев назад +1

      Thanks a lot :) And thanks for your support!

  • @Sarah-pu8un
    @Sarah-pu8un 9 месяцев назад +1

    Jetzt habe ich es endlich verstanden! Konnte mit meinem Uni Skript gar nichts anfangen. Danke!

  • @МахойЮти
    @МахойЮти 2 года назад +9

    Мне рекомендуется это в 12 часов ночи. Довольно интересно.

  • @mastershooter64
    @mastershooter64 2 года назад +16

    will you cover complex functions of several variables in this series?

  • @saimasiddiqua5288
    @saimasiddiqua5288 2 года назад +8

    hello, could you make a video about how to study new topic of mathematics, some tricks and strategy to follow. like, when i start a new topic i get stuck on one page for hours to understand and then take too much time to finish whole chapter. i dont have a lot of time. if i get some idea from you how to improve learning math properly or you make a video that would be helpful. sorry for long comments.
    Thank you for your patience.

  • @abublahinocuckbloho4539
    @abublahinocuckbloho4539 2 года назад +7

    Where you combined the 2 series the subscript to b became negative but you kept the exponent K positive? This is confusing as you redefined reciprocal series into a power series by changing how K was defined, so what you did with combining the series doesn't logically follow

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  2 года назад

      I don't really understand what you mean. Sorry.

    • @samas69420
      @samas69420 2 года назад +1

      @@brightsideofmaths i think he is talking about what you did at 4:50 when you rewrite the sum for b leaving exponent k positive but changing the interval for k to [1,inf]

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  2 года назад

      @@samas69420 Thanks. Do you also see a problem with that?

    • @samas69420
      @samas69420 2 года назад +1

      ​@@brightsideofmaths not really but maybe it might be a bit complicated to understand at first glance, i think the misunderstanding is that abu assumed that the sum from 1 to +inf of b_{-k}*z^k should give the same result as the sum from -1 to -inf of b_{k}*z^k while if i understood it correctly it's not the same but it is the power series that we study using the same reasoning explained in the first part of the video to make considerations on where the series from -1 to -inf of b_{k}*z^k converges and it is done that way since because of the negative exponents the series from -1 to -inf of b_{k}*z^k is not a canonical power series

    • @higifnr
      @higifnr Год назад +1

      For anyone who is having the same issue, b_k = a_-k, so he went back to the original power series and replaced a_k with b_-k while ignoring the constant a0. I was quite confused myself and I hope I didn't get it wrong

  • @plegasus7308
    @plegasus7308 2 года назад

    Good complex analysis book for someone who has done baby rudin?

  • @fawkes__
    @fawkes__ 2 месяца назад

    at 4:53 should it be z**-k or did I miss something?

  • @mongus-cy2yc
    @mongus-cy2yc 22 дня назад

    goat 🐐 🐐

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  22 дня назад

      So you watched my video about the Monty-Hall problem? ;)

  • @xtr3m385
    @xtr3m385 Месяц назад

    *_666 like!_*