I remember watching a documentary about the Moon on the Universe series. It's said the days on Earth back then lasted only 4-hours long and the tides were much bigger. The Moon also looked bigger due to closer distance. That would be something to see if you could travel back in time, assuming Earth had a semi-solid surface.
Anton I love your videos, the way you explore the graphics and the amount of information you pass on makes your channel one of the best on the subject however I would like to suggest you explore more point of view from the planets mostly in subject like this.
Anton, I hope you're planning a video about what is possibly the first exoplanet moon to be discovered. They say it may be the size of Neptune, and is in orbit around a Jupiter sized planet.
Really cool and informative video. This is pretty much what I was looking for. I'm also curious if the mountains we see today are a result of the moon being much closer to the earth as well. It would make sense that the gravitational pull from the moon would spike up the landscape...
The moon does tug on the ground a fair amount, lifting it as high as a few feet at some points(At least that's what I remember hearing). But I know it does pull the ground up at least a few centimeters, but again I think it pulls more at different times. HOWEVER, it's not enough to make mountains. The mountains are created mainly by Plate Tectonics. In fact, the tallest mountains in the world, which form part of the Himalayan Mountains, were formed by the Indian Plate crashing into the Asiatic Plate. It is still crashing to this day and the mountains are still growing. They get a little taller each year.
Disappointed that no mention of how large the tides were in those early days, and how the energy disippated by those tides helped to slow earth's rotation.
Your videos are very informative and entertaining, but I have to point out a mistake you made here. The lunar distance is about 384,000 kilometers (356,500 km - 406,700 km), not 300,000 km. It might have been an intentional simplification, but almost 33% difference is pretty big... :)
" ...about 28 days, which is what we call a Month..." Thanks Anton... Thanks. A month. Yes. I imagine a Steve Martin jerk-like character yelling "OH! So THAT'S what a month is!"
look into the snow line in the early formations of the system. how it got pushed back as the sun grew larger, and eventually (or so the theory says) so far out that it simply condensed as an ice giant a.k.a. planet nine... snowline theory states that the ice from the snow cloud, formed with the planets as they were being made. Would explain how water got on venus earth and mars (as well as further out)... If this theory is true, and the result is an ice giant, 9th planet, I propose we call said planet Hoth =]
Thought I should note that it's never referred to as Moon - we always refer to it as The Moon in English. The same applies to the Sun, we only ever refer to it as The Sun, not Sun. Love your videos though Anton! :)
It's mathematically feasible theory that does not break any laws of physics or require a God figure to step in. Do you know of another "theory" that has real math behind it or, as I guess, nothing you can offer has any math to it at all.
I wonder if the moon had something to do with playe tectonics. Maybe that's why Mars and Venus didn't have plate tectonics maybe they didn't have a big enough Moon pulling on the crust so the crush just solidified as one instead of solidifying in pieces
I'm wondering how high the ocean tide was when life first evolved. They always talk about tidal pools and I wonder how huge they could have been if the tide was higher.
Anton, I really like your videos. I am actually learning a lot about astronomy I hope you get funded so you can buy your super computer and run really crazy simulations we all are dying to see! Just one thing i found really weird about this video: You didn't destroy the earth in the end like you always do, why?
Can you explain why the debris that made the moon didn't just get pulled into the earth, or why the moon didn't get pulled into the earth being so close please?
Heard a figure of 47 days when the Earth's rotation will match with the orbital period of the Moon, but the Sun would likely swell into a red giant before then
7:28 Anton you showed what the Moon would have looked like from the surface, but you just barely missed the Earth and Moon in the same frame from the surface perspective, so I cannot really tell here how "big" it would have appeared in the sky. Also would like to see a real-time representation of it's movement (not here of course bc it would take too long) across the sky to see if it was a perceptible movement or not?. And, undoubtedly, the Moon would have been in Earth's shadow more often and for longer periods as it crossed the night sky From what I can tell, it looks maybe like it would have been a perceptible movement to the naked eye, from west to east. Could someone please do DA MATH for me and determine whether we could visibly watch the Moon skate across the sky or not? thanks in advance!
The video would have been more useful if you specified the time of each step (i.e., how many million years ago). Also, it would be nice to determine at each time the apparent diameter of the moon
The strong tidal effects extract rotational energy so the moon becomes locked. The tides also slow down the orbits. Most of the moons in solar system are tidal locked.
It has enough mass to hold an atmosphere, look at Titan. It's just that it doesn't have a magnetic field so any atmosphere it could have would be blown away by stellar winds.
Why does temperature matter in holding an atmosphere? If Titan was moved to Earth's orbit, it would retain it's atmosphere, though the atmosphere would gain A LOT of Methane. It's atmosphere would decay, though, because AFAIK Titan doesn't have a magnetic field. So it's not temperature that matters, it's having a magnetic field, because magnetic fields block the worst of the sun's rays, which would otherwise strip most of the atmosphere off a planet or moon. Look at Mars, it can get up to 25 C there, but since there's no magnetic field, it's atmosphere is less than 1/100th that of Earth's.
I wouldn't agree that humans are the most complex lifeforms on our planet. The Homo sapiens genome is composed of approximately 3 billion base pairs. Amoeba proteus has 290 billion, but the world record is Amoeba dubia, at 670 billion. Hell, even a toad (Bufo bufo) has 6.9 billion base pairs, more than twice the genetic complexity of a human.
Makes me think the perimids we find around the globe may be balancing weights like those on a car wheel. Could the earth be in balanced by the amount of building materials mining and oil taken out of the planet , redistributed. Could the weight of a major city shift the planet. I think these could be greater issues than this global warming thing.
I've only recently found out about Theia.. how did scientists come to the conclusion that Theia once existed? Is there any evidence about it? Amazing videos btw!! These are very interesting and educating :)
Hi Lea K You might already have your answer by now but just in case Im gonna give it a go. I am definitely no expert, just a couch potato that has watched too much youtube and tele. There are a number of factors that lead to the conclusion the Moon was once part of our Earth. Although it could be argued it was NEVER part of Earth as Earth didnt actually exist at the time the materials for the Moons creation were released. Two other smaller bodies gave birth too our Moon and the Earth at the same time is probably more accurate. Here are 3 factors for the theory, if I remember correctly.... 1. Composition: The elements present in samples studied under a microscope show there is an almost total lack of heavy elements in the Moons make up. If the Moon was made up of the same materials as the rest of the system it should have a certain percentage of the heavier elements that were present in the cosmic soup of our early solar system but it does not. Something seems to have filtered them out. The lighter elements present in the moons makeup match fairly well to those same elements here on Earth. 2. Gravity: The Moon is too large to have been captured by Earths gravity, if I remember correctly it has too much mass. So if it was a wondering lil planetoid out there somewhere and it went past Earth either it would not have been caught at all or, if had been, its great mass and the speed it would have been moving through space at the time would have likely caused it to slam into the surface of Earth instead of achieving a stable orbit. 3. Computer Modeling. Using super computers scientists and others ( a couple of interns I think) have determined that an impact from a smaller planetoid hitting a slightly larger one is capable of producing as a result a large planet and the leftover, which did not fall back to the surface under gravity, an orbiting ring of debris. The Debris would have been composed of the surface materials of both planetoids and the heavier elements which gravity had already pulled deeper into each body would have remained relatively intact and simply merged together to give us our Earth. The ring of debris would in a very short space of time have joined together in orbit to form either the Moon as we know it or possibly several orbiting moon-like objects. These smaller objects would still end up colliding in a relatively short period of time to form the Moon. Apparently the second option is less likely but still possible. Couple of points: When I say the moon formed in a short period of time, I mean SHORT! Tens of thousands of years but less than a million. I think i even saw an estimate of one year for the bulk of the mass to have formed! The collision was modeled in a variety of ways but the ONLY way that works is a glancing blow, sort of off to the side, at a fairly specific angle of impact. A direct impact would have destroyed both planetoids and a small impact with both planetoids just hitting slightly wouldnt caused the damage required. A glancing blow it the right angle literally causes the surfaces of both bodies to peel off. The centres merge and most of the debris blown into space does not have enough velocity to escape orbit so it would form a ring instead. For reasons I cant recall well enough to explain (gravity, planet size, place in the system, etc) a ring will not remain stable around the Earth in this situation, it would form an orbiting body. If anyone out there is a scientist feel free to let me know how close I got with this off the top of my head explanation! Id hate to put Lea wrong!!
If this is how it really was, explain how moon stabilized it's orbit around Earth and not continued to move further away and suddenly has perfectly rounded orbit... That's not very likely.
Thats why the front face of the moon is smooth , reflected heat from the molten Earth melted it , also there was way more tides a day back then,,,,,,also you sound funny in the old vids,,,No " Wonerful Person" yet...good work anyway..m8
Isn't the moon moving away at the rate of 1.5 inches per year, and are not the contents, well the Atlantic side, moving apart at the rate of an inch a year?
A strike traveling approximately 38,000 miles per hour was recorded during the full lunar eclipse on Jan. 21, 2019. Google: 'Pow! A meteor slams into the moon'. Just one of several hits that have been recorded over time.
I was lucky to be looking at the moon with my binoculars at the exact moment the lunar eclipse meteor impacted. Pretty cool...likely the rarest thing I will ever see in my entire life!
Trying to wrap my head around the Moon's orbit, correct me if i'm wrong but does the Moon orbit the opposite way to which we perceive because the Earth is spinning?
If anyone can answer my question how close was the moon 200 million years ago to Earth I can't seem to find any information out whatsoever I want to know what the dinosaurs got to look at each night if it was clear
I remember watching a documentary about the Moon on the Universe series. It's said the days on Earth back then lasted only 4-hours long and the tides were much bigger. The Moon also looked bigger due to closer distance. That would be something to see if you could travel back in time, assuming Earth had a semi-solid surface.
I'd like to see a simulation of that.
I think all planets have a dense enough surface somewhere on them even if it’s the core. Whether you could make it there is a different story🤣
11PM: okay just one more video before I go to bed
3AM:
and how lol
Same
Girom Christian Calica same here 😂😂😂😭😭😭
Literally same because he uploads a new video every day at exactly 12 AM and I end up watching his vids until 2 AM (British timezone)
Exactly
Why dont you have more subs you're awesome
s
m8 I was here when he had less than 10k subs get on my level
/s
Games Infinity. D
Accent is the issue
Anton I love your videos, the way you explore the graphics and the amount of information you pass on makes your channel one of the best on the subject however I would like to suggest you explore more point of view from the planets mostly in subject like this.
Last time I was this early the moon was actually part of the earth.
Peter Rabitt euuuh.. we know.
it was a joke obviously, you nerd
Lol 😂 XD
001thefish -.-
Aidan Bowie it never was
0:47 There is a smiley face on the moon :)
jupiter space leave my favorite planet out of this. because all the rain here in Florida right now I can't look at Jupiter through my telescope.
-_-
i see it
NecroToxinGD
I don't see it
There's an entire pretty good book series about this, life as we knew it
Anton, I hope you're planning a video about what is possibly the first exoplanet moon to be discovered. They say it may be the size of Neptune, and is in orbit around a Jupiter sized planet.
6:32
*And the dinosaurs are gone...*
Not really, there's probably too little water for there to be any species like that on the planet at the time lol
That’s what I thought to lol (why am I commenting on a comment from 3 years ago)
@@bean40
Btw thanks for protecting mercury, venus, earth, and mars:)
I love this channel.
Really cool and informative video. This is pretty much what I was looking for. I'm also curious if the mountains we see today are a result of the moon being much closer to the earth as well. It would make sense that the gravitational pull from the moon would spike up the landscape...
The moon does tug on the ground a fair amount, lifting it as high as a few feet at some points(At least that's what I remember hearing). But I know it does pull the ground up at least a few centimeters, but again I think it pulls more at different times. HOWEVER, it's not enough to make mountains. The mountains are created mainly by Plate Tectonics. In fact, the tallest mountains in the world, which form part of the Himalayan Mountains, were formed by the Indian Plate crashing into the Asiatic Plate. It is still crashing to this day and the mountains are still growing. They get a little taller each year.
@@xione0825 thanks you!
Moon was social distancing before social distancing was cool.
Disappointed that no mention of how large the tides were in those early days, and how the energy disippated by those tides helped to slow earth's rotation.
Thanks. Excellent!
WOW!Last time i saw your Subscribers its just 10K and now BOOM 76K
Your videos are very informative and entertaining, but I have to point out a mistake you made here.
The lunar distance is about 384,000 kilometers (356,500 km - 406,700 km), not 300,000 km.
It might have been an intentional simplification, but almost 33% difference is pretty big... :)
Those of us wanting more hours in the day will eventually get our wish.
so its almost safe to say that other earth like planets would need to have a moon in order to have life on them
" ...about 28 days, which is what we call a Month..."
Thanks Anton... Thanks. A month. Yes.
I imagine a Steve Martin jerk-like character yelling "OH! So THAT'S what a month is!"
Ever heard of other calendars and lunar months?
Ever heard of February?
What software are you using in this simulation?
aaaaand there goes that bit of life
look into the snow line in the early formations of the system. how it got pushed back as the sun grew larger, and eventually (or so the theory says) so far out that it simply condensed as an ice giant a.k.a. planet nine... snowline theory states that the ice from the snow cloud, formed with the planets as they were being made. Would explain how water got on venus earth and mars (as well as further out)... If this theory is true, and the result is an ice giant, 9th planet, I propose we call said planet Hoth =]
All the meteors hit earth and none hit the moon, we take all the beating, I knew it!
Thought I should note that it's never referred to as Moon - we always refer to it as The Moon in English. The same applies to the Sun, we only ever refer to it as The Sun, not Sun. Love your videos though Anton! :)
We do not capitalize it in that context, though: The earth revolves around the sun.
The astronauts landed on the moon.
The collision theory of the moons formation is just that , a theory
It's mathematically feasible theory that does not break any laws of physics or require a God figure to step in. Do you know of another "theory" that has real math behind it or, as I guess, nothing you can offer has any math to it at all.
"What is the rate of rotation for Earth?" "One day per day." "Wow."
I wonder if the moon had something to do with playe tectonics. Maybe that's why Mars and Venus didn't have plate tectonics maybe they didn't have a big enough Moon pulling on the crust so the crush just solidified as one instead of solidifying in pieces
Nice vid!
15th! Now that I got that off my chest, Nice video!
I'm wondering how high the ocean tide was when life first evolved. They always talk about tidal pools and I wonder how huge they could have been if the tide was higher.
this is great video!
Anton, I really like your videos. I am actually learning a lot about astronomy I hope you get funded so you can buy your super computer and run really crazy simulations we all are dying to see!
Just one thing i found really weird about this video: You didn't destroy the earth in the end like you always do, why?
Your profile photo is so uncanny
I new this befor the video started
I'd like to see one video:
What would happen if Pluto was placed very softly in the surface of venus.
Can you explain why the debris that made the moon didn't just get pulled into the earth, or why the moon didn't get pulled into the earth being so close please?
Hello wonderful person. Love the pick me up.
What music do you use for the whaat the math part
Did the moon become so spherical under it's own gravity and asteroid impacts?
So was this the Big Bang
What program is that you are using...?
Heard a figure of 47 days when the Earth's rotation will match with the orbital period of the Moon, but the Sun would likely swell into a red giant before then
Nice vid
7:28 Anton you showed what the Moon would have looked like from the surface, but you just barely missed the Earth and Moon in the same frame from the surface perspective, so I cannot really tell here how "big" it would have appeared in the sky. Also would like to see a real-time representation of it's movement (not here of course bc it would take too long) across the sky to see if it was a perceptible movement or not?. And, undoubtedly, the Moon would have been in Earth's shadow more often and for longer periods as it crossed the night sky
From what I can tell, it looks maybe like it would have been a perceptible movement to the naked eye, from west to east. Could someone please do DA MATH for me and determine whether we could visibly watch the Moon skate across the sky or not? thanks in advance!
The video would have been more useful if you specified the time of each step (i.e., how many million years ago). Also, it would be nice to determine at each time the apparent diameter of the moon
also, i wonder if you could make a video about stars with rings such as saturn's or even that super crazy planet you showed us a while ago ( J1407b )
Noticed the moon was spinning but today its tidal locked with earth. What caused that?
The strong tidal effects extract rotational energy so the moon becomes locked. The tides also slow down the orbits. Most of the moons in solar system are tidal locked.
Question for What da math: why moon not habitatable?
Yeni Wahyudi It does not have enough mass to have an atmosphere
Yeni Wahyudi Because u can't survive on it.
It has enough mass to hold an atmosphere, look at Titan.
It's just that it doesn't have a magnetic field so any atmosphere it could have would be blown away by stellar winds.
Xenakallis Titan is actually only able to hold an atmosphere because of the really low temperatures around Saturn
Why does temperature matter in holding an atmosphere?
If Titan was moved to Earth's orbit, it would retain it's atmosphere, though the atmosphere would gain A LOT of Methane.
It's atmosphere would decay, though, because AFAIK Titan doesn't have a magnetic field.
So it's not temperature that matters, it's having a magnetic field, because magnetic fields block the worst of the sun's rays, which would otherwise strip most of the atmosphere off a planet or moon.
Look at Mars, it can get up to 25 C there, but since there's no magnetic field, it's atmosphere is less than 1/100th that of Earth's.
I wouldn't agree that humans are the most complex lifeforms on our planet. The Homo sapiens genome is composed of approximately 3 billion base pairs. Amoeba proteus has 290 billion, but the world record is Amoeba dubia, at 670 billion. Hell, even a toad (Bufo bufo) has 6.9 billion base pairs, more than twice the genetic complexity of a human.
Again too perfect to just have happened by itself
Days were very short at the time the Moon was very close to the Earth.
Makes me think the perimids we find around the globe may be balancing weights like those on a car wheel. Could the earth be in balanced by the amount of building materials mining and oil taken out of the planet , redistributed. Could the weight of a major city shift the planet.
I think these could be greater issues than this global warming thing.
MANY MOONS
AGO
@ Anton Petrov ... Great video, well-presented, but I *HAVE TO ASK*, what software package are you using?? It's amazing!
Universe sandbox 2
I've only recently found out about Theia.. how did scientists come to the conclusion that Theia once existed? Is there any evidence about it?
Amazing videos btw!! These are very interesting and educating :)
Hi Lea K
You might already have your answer by now but just in case Im gonna give it a go. I am definitely no expert, just a couch potato that has watched too much youtube and tele.
There are a number of factors that lead to the conclusion the Moon was once part of our Earth. Although it could be argued it was NEVER part of Earth as Earth didnt actually exist at the time the materials for the Moons creation were released. Two other smaller bodies gave birth too our Moon and the Earth at the same time is probably more accurate.
Here are 3 factors for the theory, if I remember correctly....
1. Composition: The elements present in samples studied under a microscope show there is an almost total lack of heavy elements in the Moons make up. If the Moon was made up of the same materials as the rest of the system it should have a certain percentage of the heavier elements that were present in the cosmic soup of our early solar system but it does not. Something seems to have filtered them out. The lighter elements present in the moons makeup match fairly well to those same elements here on Earth.
2. Gravity: The Moon is too large to have been captured by Earths gravity, if I remember correctly it has too much mass. So if it was a wondering lil planetoid out there somewhere and it went past Earth either it would not have been caught at all or, if had been, its great mass and the speed it would have been moving through space at the time would have likely caused it to slam into the surface of Earth instead of achieving a stable orbit.
3. Computer Modeling. Using super computers scientists and others ( a couple of interns I think) have determined that an impact from a smaller planetoid hitting a slightly larger one is capable of producing as a result a large planet and the leftover, which did not fall back to the surface under gravity, an orbiting ring of debris. The Debris would have been composed of the surface materials of both planetoids and the heavier elements which gravity had already pulled deeper into each body would have remained relatively intact and simply merged together to give us our Earth. The ring of debris would in a very short space of time have joined together in orbit to form either the Moon as we know it or possibly several orbiting moon-like objects. These smaller objects would still end up colliding in a relatively short period of time to form the Moon. Apparently the second option is less likely but still possible.
Couple of points:
When I say the moon formed in a short period of time, I mean SHORT! Tens of thousands of years but less than a million. I think i even saw an estimate of one year for the bulk of the mass to have formed!
The collision was modeled in a variety of ways but the ONLY way that works is a glancing blow, sort of off to the side, at a fairly specific angle of impact. A direct impact would have destroyed both planetoids and a small impact with both planetoids just hitting slightly wouldnt caused the damage required. A glancing blow it the right angle literally causes the surfaces of both bodies to peel off. The centres merge and most of the debris blown into space does not have enough velocity to escape orbit so it would form a ring instead. For reasons I cant recall well enough to explain (gravity, planet size, place in the system, etc) a ring will not remain stable around the Earth in this situation, it would form an orbiting body.
If anyone out there is a scientist feel free to let me know how close I got with this off the top of my head explanation! Id hate to put Lea wrong!!
Witch game is this. I want it
So we should start stocking up with canned food then?
do you have any sources? researching for a project
The werewolf problem must have been awful.
Im now just wondering what made that Polar Mountain line.
Plate tectonics.
its like SUPER CLOSE WHY NO COLLISIONS
So to add a hour to earths 24 hours circle takes 180 million years but does it means when dinosaurs died they had a 23.5 hour day ?
If this is how it really was, explain how moon stabilized it's orbit around Earth and not continued to move further away and suddenly has perfectly rounded orbit... That's not very likely.
In current theoretical physics, the moon has no effect or relationship with the Magnetosphere, is that correct?
correct. It's more to do with earth's core. The moon has heck all to do with it
Thats why the front face of the moon is smooth , reflected heat from the molten Earth melted it , also there was way more tides a day back then,,,,,,also you sound funny in the old vids,,,No " Wonerful Person" yet...good work anyway..m8
We need to anchor the moon to the earth brah
Isn't the moon moving away at the rate of 1.5 inches per year, and are not the contents, well the Atlantic side, moving apart at the rate of an inch a year?
How can I submit questions Anton?
What is this software you are using?
What is this simulation app that is use?
I think subterranean life would persist even without the magnetosphere, at least for a while.
Have we ever recorded an actual meteor strike on the moon? if so, where can I view this video?
A strike traveling approximately 38,000 miles per hour was recorded during the full lunar eclipse on Jan. 21, 2019.
Google: 'Pow! A meteor slams into the moon'. Just one of several hits that have been recorded over time.
I was lucky to be looking at the moon with my binoculars at the exact moment the lunar eclipse meteor impacted. Pretty cool...likely the rarest thing I will ever see in my entire life!
Why does the animation of the early moon have shockwaves on the surface during colisions?
385000 km. More I don't have to say.
It was very moonish back then there is such a thing as too much moon
terraform a dice xD
you can do anything!
Unless....we left click and push the moon back. ;)
Trying to wrap my head around the Moon's orbit, correct me if i'm wrong but does the Moon orbit the opposite way to which we perceive because the Earth is spinning?
6:31 rip dinosaurs
lol
“When Moon was closer to earth”
How strong is magnetosphere on Mars? Does it cause great problem in terraformation?
Mars has no magnitosphere so yes that is a problem
Just in case let's attach a big booster to the side of the earth and spin it so we don't loose the magnetosphere.
You need the sun for a magnetosphere.
What? Earth's magnetosphere is made by its molten iron core rotating inside the planet.
I mean for game play. Earth has a magnetosphere, but it only shows when the sun or another star is present in relative proximity.
You skiped the part were the ring was made
THE Moon my friend. Might wanna fix the title xD
Also dude, what's your steam account? Would love to talk one day! :D
Looks like he doesn't read comment.
I like that he says "moon". We all get the point.
And the moon was a part of earth
Why did earth move so much if it moves it will get colder
I thought the moon maybe bounced off
Anton Petrov. Where you from? Your accents pretty cool.
Lightner445555555555 Russia 🇷🇺 - but he now lives and teaches in Canada 🇨🇦
Cool
wish kerbal space program looked like this
What do you think about that gap-toothed Stacey Abrams commercial. My gahd.
Full 🌙🌑
So if the moon was close to earth do that mean there were plants and life on the moon?
I wonder if anyone or anything could survive if the earth stoped spinning AKA could any thing survive the creation of HELL ON EARTH
If anyone can answer my question how close was the moon 200 million years ago to Earth I can't seem to find any information out whatsoever I want to know what the dinosaurs got to look at each night if it was clear
Anton you should do a video about where earth's water is coming from... This quantity from asteroids? Really?
the moon is moving away from the earth...wouldn't that cancel out the drag it has on the earth's spin
When the moon formed the earth was a lava planet
Why when we explode the Earth the fragments just don't reaggro?
Dood Guy Are you Max Farnham? If not, ignore me. If you are, you like Anton obliterating planets too? Wow!
Is there life on the moon?