Casio G-SHOCK GBD-H2000 Review: The sportiest G-Shock yet

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 авг 2024
  • The Casio G-SHOCK GBD-H2000 is a major upgrade on what we’ve seen before in terms of G-Shock sports watch, with more sports modes, a lighter design and the integration of Polar’s sleep and training analysis. Run Tester Nick has been putting the watch through its paces over the past couple of weeks to see how it matches up to the best sports watches on the market.
    JUMP STRAIGHT IN:
    00:00​​​​ - Intro
    00:14 - What’s You Need To Know
    03:17 - The Run Test
    03:22 - Design
    04:29 - Tracking & Analysis
    06:35 - GPS Accuracy
    08:12 - HR Accuracy
    09:35 - Battery Life
    10:58 - Activity & Sleep Tracking
    12:07 - User Interface & App
    13:54 - Verdict & Alternatives
    Subscribe to The Run Testers for more running gear reviews:
    ruclips.net/user/TheRunTeste...
    Garmin Forerunner 265 Multi-Tester Review: • Garmin Forerunner 265 ...
    Garmin Forerunner 255 Review By 3 Runners: • Garmin Forerunner 255 ...
    Garmin Epix 2 Review After 8 Months: • Garmin Epix 2 Review A...
    Garmin Fenix 7 Review: • Garmin Fenix 7 Review:...
    Apple Watch Ultra Review From 4 Runners: • Apple Watch Ultra Revi...
    Garmin Forerunner 955 Review: • Garmin Forerunner 955 ...
    Apple Watch Ultra vs Apple Watch Series 8: • Apple Watch Ultra vs A...
    Garmin Fenix 7 vs Epix 2: • Garmin Fenix 7 vs Epix...
  • СпортСпорт

Комментарии • 34

  • @JimKinkade
    @JimKinkade Год назад +16

    I have this and I like it despite its drawbacks. It’s basic features appeal to me since I’m just trying to get in shape. I think of it as a G-Shock with an add on heart rate monitor.

  • @user-nt9pi2xi4f
    @user-nt9pi2xi4f 2 месяца назад

    Never would expect a g shock review

  • @DodySuratman
    @DodySuratman Год назад +5

    Thanks for the review. Currently I have the h1000 and your few mentions about it spot on. At this point I think the Move series still have long way to go for the price point. People better off with Garmin or Polar if they just want good running/exercise watches. Being a G-Shock fan, I still enjoy the h1000, and this h2000 is obviously much better, but I would probably wait a bit for price drop or the next gen.

  • @sobluedeep
    @sobluedeep Год назад

    Great review, all I want is GShock + HR & sport tracking, that's more than enough

  • @michaelparker4457
    @michaelparker4457 10 месяцев назад

    Excellent Review. Am considering one of these as a replacement for an old FitBit as I am a fan of the G-Shock Line. However, after listening to your review, I believe I will do some additional research. I absolutely love G-Shock watches because of their durability and hoped that this particular watch would have the performance and features. Anyhow, thanks for a great review.

  • @pvflyer67
    @pvflyer67 Год назад

    Fair review 🍺

  • @Andy.mikhail137
    @Andy.mikhail137 Год назад +1

    Nick looking like a professor in this one

  • @fabsterun
    @fabsterun Год назад +3

    For a second I thought you were wearing a lab jacket 😂 was like wow ! Serious testing.. anyway great vid

  • @adrian1229
    @adrian1229 Год назад +1

    Love this watch just got 1 of this and its a good one compared to its predecessor which is the GBD-H1000; its light in the wrist and has addtl functions!!! A must to have for people who do a lot of exercise and outdoors!! SOLAR POWERED👍👍👍

    • @pedrovorpholiveira9154
      @pedrovorpholiveira9154 Год назад +1

      ?? For people who do a lot of sport....without Heart rate strap conectivity 😅😅😅. Garmin is also solar powered. Check the Instinct series

  • @rsgt2023
    @rsgt2023 Год назад +1

    Thanks for your great review again! 😊 I think it's very nice looking watch, but don't think I'll end up buying because the lack of strava (or any other) sync and support for external heart rate straps :/

  • @massi888
    @massi888 Год назад +1

    thank you for the review. In my opinion is really spot on, this shows me that you really test carefully. i bought the watch and sent it back because of exactly what you said, no external heart rate monitor t and the one on the watch is terrible, no dedicated treadmill run, overall really basic for the price range. I see you seem happy with forerunner 265, is it worth to pay extra and get the FR 965?

    • @TheRunTesters
      @TheRunTesters  Год назад +1

      Thanks! I’ve not yet tested the 965, but I’d guess the choice will mainly come down to whether you want the maps. The 965 also has a smarter look, and the screen sounds great by all accounts, but the 265 does everything I would need 99% of the time very well

  • @bh4560
    @bh4560 Год назад

    When you getting those vaporfly 3s reviewed guys!! Checking every ten minutes hahaha.. cmon lads!!

  • @deshkanagrikhoon
    @deshkanagrikhoon Год назад +1

    Though it seems to be a improved version over its predecessor but the wrist based heart rate monitor inaccuracies and no external hrm sensor connectivity is a deal breaker I think.

  • @user-hm8wz4vp8l
    @user-hm8wz4vp8l Месяц назад

    i have had Instinct 2 solar twice now and both failed after 6-12months so on that basis alone i would go casio.

  • @chaosevolution
    @chaosevolution Год назад

    Does anyone know if G Shock digital watches (and the G shock app) are better than fitbits?

  • @WariWahab
    @WariWahab Год назад +7

    No external HRM connectivity. It's like a waste of the Polar capabilities especially when the wrist HR is not accurate at all.

    • @TheRunTesters
      @TheRunTesters  Год назад +1

      Yeah it’s definitely a shame to not have that connectivity

    • @lennygarrison6836
      @lennygarrison6836 Год назад

      With the HRM being inaccurate, is that a software issue, or a hardware issue?

    • @WariWahab
      @WariWahab Год назад

      @Lenny Garrison I believe it's most likely hardware. Looking at the sensors it looks like it's meant for style rather than function. Polar, Garmin and Apple optical HR sensors looks more functional than that, actually, there is a style factor in Apple's sensor.
      Who knows, they can try increase the sampling rate or something in software to make it better, but don't really know these things.
      Anyway, when it comes to activities, HR sensors tend to not be as accurate (they are getting better), but not allowing to pair with HR straps when you have a bad sensor is really bad

  • @ABHINANDAN272
    @ABHINANDAN272 Год назад +1

    Can hr accuracy be improved by a upadate??..

  • @Dude_Virus
    @Dude_Virus Месяц назад

    Does it track the steps always OR do we need to start any mode for that?

  • @kevin-roussos
    @kevin-roussos 7 месяцев назад

    Has the watch got a hour charm? If so how do I turn it on? Thanks guys.

  • @TheHutchRuns
    @TheHutchRuns Год назад +1

    With the lack of features, it sounds expensive compared to Garmin/Coros equivalents

  • @abhishes
    @abhishes Год назад

    I purchased this on March 16th. one of the biggest issues with the watch is that the GPS is just non-functional. it will take forever to acquire connection and will lose it very easily. So its impossible to track any outdoor activity even in every open spaces with clear view of the sky.

  • @kamilzych6311
    @kamilzych6311 Год назад +1

    and still doesn't have connection to heart ratę sensor on chest...:(

  • @gshockbabe6144
    @gshockbabe6144 7 месяцев назад

    Ill stick with the gbd100 and gbdh1000.I dont like the layered construction and charging plug on the newer model.

  • @NormanWoods
    @NormanWoods Год назад

    Had mine for a few days. Such a waste of the capabilities. Definitely not a serious sports watch. Looks great though.

  • @Catcrumbs
    @Catcrumbs Год назад

    Baffled as to why anyone would pick this over an Instinct of some kind.

  • @scottk.9835
    @scottk.9835 Год назад

    Sadly disappointed in this purchase.

  • @azonek10
    @azonek10 11 месяцев назад

    Super ale muszą ogarnąć aplikacje Casio watches bo to koszmar 😀