I disagree, it was garbage. As soon as they said the National Enquirer was required reading...then they played a montage of headlines. I've studied and watched the trial for 2 years and headline by headline I rattled off all the inaccuracies - if not OUTRIGHT LIES!
The forensic team was a gift. Yamauchi testified that he didn't believe he should change his gloves after spilling OJs reference sample on them. They testified that they were never even trained on handling DNA. What's scary is there are so many people who couldn't afford to defend themselves from this crime lab.
Yep that's the best social gathering when discussing serious topics. You learn a lot. If Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman were both BLACK, not a huge issue. So, yes, it was about RACE.
It was a huge story S oj was absolutely belioved in America. A mega star accused of murdering 2 people going on the run and threatening suicide. If it was 2 hookers would have been just as big of a story.
We are like that in our communities all across these United States not an unusual occurrence. We good with ourselves whenever the devil isn’t involved.
It was more about sensationalism than the lives of two people The police know that Nicole Brown Simpson was a cocaine addict! , They knew that she hung around with the wrong people You didn't know that !
I swear did you even watch this whole video. Both professors explaines the celebration at 44:07 and 42:50. Unless your the type too keep your head in your ass and isn't willing to listen to other people's opinions.
@@Supreme-gu1jz It's the same opinion A stereotype, that the black community thinks the same way Which is untrue & prejudicial It also promotes that even slighted mishap, doesn't apply to black people, that commit crimes. Because it happens too often. There's a moral compass of taking responsibility for violent actions. Watts Compton, Boyle Heights and Inglewood look that way for a reason !
Not crazy at all. Simply put, he has the courage to call any situation like he sees it without being influenced by anyone or anything, whether they agree with him or they disagree and then suggest he’s “batshit crazy.” He’s one of the best constitutional scholars ever. Too bad that the weak minded can’t see that and because they don’t always agree make such ignorant references about him.
“It is the job of the defense attorney, especially when representing the guilty, to prevent by all lawful means, the truth from coming out.” -Alan Dershowitz ( _The Best Defense_ )
Poor Ron, I that Ron should have been a little more savvy or Clever enough and should've anticipated ( enough natural born street wise) to realize that OJ and Nicole were still, ( although subtle) behind closed doors still lovers! I blame Nicole mostly.. Ron had to be so naive to not be aware of that...what was he thinking? She was basically still married...I wish Ron would've paid attention..
@@daviddavis3389 I hear you. OJ killed Nicole and Ron in the heat of the moment. Jury had months to go over evidence. But they chose to go along racial lines and had already made a decision within first couple of weeks. If it is not travesty of justice then what is. It was unfair to Ron's dad and sister. I curse those juries for what they did. They will never find peace in their life. They will absolutely 100% pay off their bad karma in their lifetime.
@@sodapop83 They were called the Dream Team for good reason. Their defence was based on dreams and fantasies instead of facts and reality. All they did was prove Fuhrman used the n-word 8 years before and because of that they started saying "Maybe this, maybe that, maybe this, maybe that." 🤣🤣🤣 And the 🌍 of the 🐵🐵🐵 fell for it. Its disgusting but funny at the same time. Anyway, the racial suffering they're enduring these days, its on them. This verdict showed that they don't really deserve any better.
@@TDKiller415 Exactly. They believed Mark Fuhrman saying the N word was more important than the undeniable DNA evidence which proved Simpson was 100% guilty.
The question still remains, if OJ and his defence truly believed the police planted evidence then why didn’t OJ sue to police force? A truly innocent man, whose reputation was tarnished, why didn’t he sue if he truly was innocent? I guess it doesn’t matter since OJ himself admitted in writing and in an interview that he did it, and yet people still believe he’s innocent.
It's not exactly like O J. Since has made his character shine in righteousness. 300 shoes worldwide, and that foitprint was on the scene and belonged to O.J. So now the label just changed : they stand gladly inadvertently with flawed personalities in vindication.
I never understood the 3 knocks heard by Kato. If OJ or someone else ran into the A/C unit behind his building why not just one thud ? Was he knocking for help ? And why did OJ ask him about change for McDonald's ? Setting up an alibi....
@@johndeagle4389 With this amount of baseless "planting" allegations, you'd think Mark Fuhrman was a superhuman gardener 🤣🤣 Its easier to plant a billion seeds in each country in one single day than secretly planting a glove on a murder suspect while being watched by countless others.
I was born in Seattle in 1973, where I grew up. Japanese-American. Male. People ask me "Why does your race, birth place, birth year, and gender matter about anything?" Well, does THIS OJ case, and most of all, reactions to the verdict, answer that question? What if you were my opponent in a court case, and MY lawyers approached YOUR lawyers, and asked, "Would you agree to a jury, of 12 Japanese-American males?" I bet your lawyer would say "no way." Devil's Advocate: "People are people," and if you make your case, shouldn't these 12 Japanese-American males be objective, and rule in your favor? People can be in denial all they want. Race DOES affect how people think, including jurors. I DO think that Mark Fuhrman messed it up for the prosecution, and basically gifted the defense their case.
Maybe if the prosecution/lapd wouldn't have lied,planting gloves and socks with edta on them. Denise Brown lying about OJ's demeanor at the dance recital and then showing OJ after the recital kissing her and her parents. They may have had a better chance of winning
Edta is found in almost all organic matter. It’s even in laundry detergent. I’m sure the LAPD also planted a shoe print of OJ’s Bruno Magli’s he lied about too right? 😂
They had their case handed back to them by the Defense and showed them that they should not have tried OJ. They tried to present planted evidence as proof of his guilt.
@@andrerobinson2923 What was the planted evidence? Who planted it? What proof was there? What punishment did they get? Was it life in prison or the death penalty? If there was truly any planted evidence, someone would've gone to the gas chamber or got life in prison, according to section 128 of the California Penal Code and the US constitution. I know to certain scumbags like Alan Dershowitz its a lie (he's buddies with Donald Trump, so yes, the constitution is a big lie for scum like them), but thats how it is. So provide the planted evidence, the proof and the person who planted it. If you can't, stfu.
Actually they did a brilliant job at proving OJ's guilt. But because of that clown Ito letting race become part of the trial, they weren't prepared to combat the bullshit allegations from Cochran and Bailey. And because those jurors had shit for brains, they only listened to the bullshit, not to the logic, because the bullshit was as close as those uneducated jurors could get to having a fine steak meal.
@@vitocarbonara7770 She was competent and fantastic when it came to proving OJ was the sole perpetrator. But incompetent when it came to countering the conspiracy theory claims, pointing put their big contradictions, and she even began villifying Fuhrman instead of standing up for him by citing him exonerating that black drug dealer Arrick Harris and then asking the jury to imagine if OJ and Cochran were white and Nicole, Ron and Fuhrman were black and the whole conspiracy theory hung on Fuhrman using racial slurs about whites. Marcia could've easily used the race card too to discredit Cochran and Bailey, but she didn't. That was her incompetence. But maybe that was also down to the circus ringmaster Ito who allowed race in the first place.
Johnny Cochran said he was going to call an expert who had a NOBEL PEACE PRIZE for CHEMISTRY. There is a Nobel Peace Prize and a Nobel Prize for Chemistry but there is no Nobel Peace Prize for Chemistry.
Eh, if you talk for 300 days recorded you'll miss pronounce a few things. The person was Kari Mullis, inventor of PCR DNA testing who had stated that the DNA results from the prosecutor were total garbage.
The presence of people like the woman at 29:00 in a country's educational system is scary to say the least. She is ethically condoning the use of a race card to divert attention from a murder case. Nobody is saying not to address police racism, as it needs to be addressed, but not at the expense of two families looking for justice. What happened is that all the evidence and Simpson's behaviour was pointing towards his guilt, and his defence team used the race card to capitalize on emotion that is irrelevant to the case to divert attention from the main point and ignite a fire in the jurors' hearts and minds. If she thinks that is ethically excusable because of unfairness of other cases' verdicts, then that is sickening to hear from someone who is supposed to be highly educated.
Did you even hear what Mrs. Crenshaw said? That is a defense attorneys job, undermine the credibility of witnesses and attempt to create reasonable doubt. Anything less than that would be judicial malpractice. Mrs. Crenshaw teaches law at Columbia University and UCLA, I highly doubt you would stand a snowballs chance in hell in the debate arena with her.
@@rashun506 Lets see you say that if someone you love is killed and the killer is released just because the black police detective happens to have said bad things about white people in the past.
@@TDKiller415 I'll cross that bridge if I ever come to it. The burden of proof is on the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime. And the defense created doubt in the jury's mind, that's all that matters. Respect our judicial process, respect our constitution, respect the jury.
The Galactico: You totally missed what this sister said. I mean it went right over your head. Let's place your ass in that chair where OJ sat and see if you still think the way you do. Again, you are not black so there you have it.
Furman slipped up in pre-trial and said them when referring to the gloves next to Ron Goldman's body, then immediately said it. Then, after a while, he drives to OJ's house, separates himself from the other cops, and finds his truck with blood on it. Then he hopes the fence will enter his home, talks to Kato, then disappears again and finds one glove in the back alley. The blood sample they collected from OJ was admittedly brought to the crime scene. If anyone thinks OJ is guilty, it's clear who you should be upset with, the idiots who framed him instead of trusting the process.
@@coredadventure1 It was freakish circumstances where OJ did it but the lead detective was a racist who framed him, then committed perjury and took the fifth. Another cop took OJ's blood sample from the lad, with EDTA in it, and planted it. Then the incompetent prosecution had OJ try on the glove. That created reasonable doubt even though OJ probably did it. They blew the case.
She really did. Once the defense had their turn with Furham it was all over. She knew her case was "floating out the window." That's why she tried to get Judge removed and then their own witness talked about the Judge' wife and other people. The jury couldn't wait to render their decision.
Ben, like you, I too, discovered how the Jury did not like either of them especially Marcia Clark. She thought she was too smart for her own good. Other experienced Attorneys thought she walked around like a Peacock and ended up looking like an ass at the end of the trial.
She did right by putting Fuhrman on the stand. What was wrong was Ito allowing race into the trial and then Marcia and Darden not instructing Fuhrman to be truthful if he was asked about using the n-word and to publicly apologise for it. Then there would be no need for any tapes to prove him wrong, because he already told the truth and apologised. He would've made a fool of Bailey that way.
Does anybody ever wonder since OJ so easily killed two people how many others he killed or do you think Nicole just brought it out of him cuz he was so obsessed
This verdict was a product of its time and place (untrustworthy LAPD, LA riots, downtown jury, judicial incompetence, prosecutorial errors). What amazes me is the same talking heads from 20 years ago go on TV and spout the same lines from back then given the EXTRA revelations from the later civil trial (see OJs face with the photos and those ‘ugly ass shoes’) he was held up as a civil rights martyr but he never was one. After that Vegas robbery we all saw his narcissistic willingness to flout the law for his own ends and I’m glad he got at least some jail time.
I'm amazed that people still don't realize how faulty the DNA evidence was during that trial. It's Stephen Avery x1000. There's zero chance that you actually listen to the defense arguments and not have reasonable doubt. So many immediately dismiss it and that's a shame.
I am from England, looking back on this case in 2023, having done research I believe O J was the killer. I would like to know what his status is today?
It's Always Been The Same. He took His Anger Out On Nicole.. Paula Broke Up w/Him...He Wasn't Invited To The Celebration Of The Dance Recital...' No One Says NO to OJ Nicole You Fucking Bitch!!!! I Gave You EVERYTHING!!!!' And He Killed What Hurt Him The Most...
I dont think he killed them but he either knows who did it or was at the scene after the fact to confirm they were indeed dead. Many other leads that the FBI ignored could have shed some light on who did it.
@@andrerobinson2923 The Browns wouldn't dare touch OJ because they were making tons of money off him, since OJ had convinced Nicole's father to invest in a lucrative Hertz dealership that made Nicole's family very rich. Nicole's father even said he was happy with the "not guilty" verdict. You expect someone like HIM to sue anyone for not protecting his daughter? Normal fathers send someone like OJ to intensive care after the first black eye on their daughter. Lou and Juditha Brown were a pair of evil, uncaring gold diggers, and I hope they're rotting in hell with Cochran and Bailey.
@@daviddavis3389 Because its the truth. A sad truth. At least I'm not the one calling Nicole and Ron drug addicts who got what they deserved, that was the long cast of the POTA franchise who acquitted OJ and cheered for him.
They couldn't because there was no abuse! Just a coked out woman using the police when she got mad. Oj showed great restraint in the face of what she was doing. At this point in time, every adult man should know that 99% of women's claims are a lie, and they have created an environment where they can start fights and then play the victim. It's disgusting. And you being a man espousing feminist propaganda is even more disgusting. Use your brain! There's only evidence of one physical fight, in which they both hit each other. So she's just as guilty of domestic abuse as him
I’m not a law student or a lawyer/attorney, but I understand the role of the lawyers and prosecution... Technically speaking, I understand the verdict and the jury saying that they were not convinced with the reasonable doubt... That Furhman thing and Dennis Fung sloppy clean-up of the crime scene caused a monkey wrench causing the doubt... Looking back in my heart, I felt the Rodney King Verdict and the OJ Verdict were both wrong
That Mark Fuhrman thing. It’s not that hard to believe that a white police officer framed a black man. Mark Furman admitted to frame many black men. What are you talking about?
@@Nike5221 White people could sit there and like blind to it all that they want too but they know how police truly are when it comes down to Black people.
@@daffyduckfan4478 That is true... It's hard to empathize with the black race when discrimination is involved when you operate out of the lense of a White Person
Seeing white folks reactions that day was priceless i think they may have gotten an idea of how blks felt when All those klans men walked back in the day when all white juries voted not guilty.
Ok I'm not racist at all and think it's disgusting that white jurors would aquit anybody for murder that is obviously guilty over race or anything... But don't you think that doing the same thing makes you just as bad as white people that have acquitted other whites...
Think you're a big tough guy for typing that? Instead of spitting on innocent whites, grow a pair of balls, buy some guts and go fight for the black community by getting a gun and storming the headquarters of the armed white supremacists. See how long you last. Until then, stfu.
@@davidfigueroa6351 It also sucks that those OJ-supporting savages were so petty, weak, insecure, cowardly and gutless that they cheered for Nicole and Ron, two innocent whites, being butchered by a black man and then denied justice instead of arming themselves and storming the headquarters of their real racist enemies such as heavily-armed white supremacist groups. In the words of Stannis Baratheon, hard truths cut both ways, eh Dave?
These pathetic defence lawyers saying peoples reaction surprised them. People didn’t hate you coz you did your job as a lawyer but because you manipulated a trial with race and other antics and crossed all ethics and stoop so low it was unbelievable
@@rashun506 When its irrelevant to the case and is a decade old and used mainly for a fictional screenplay, then yes it is. Would you agree if the skin colours had been reversed and Fuhrman had used the term "white motherfuckers"? Would you still agree if that same tactic was used to acquit someone who raped and butchered your daughter? My guess is no. You can say that you'll "cross that bridge when you get there", but to me thats a way of saying you wouldn't agree.
@@rashun506 It is unethical of them to accuse Vannatter of planting evidence when they have absolutely no proof of it. At the time of the murders he had served 28 years in the force without a singe complaint and was getting ready to retire but he apparently he was willing to risk his career and the death penalty because he wanted to frame OJ? That makes no sense but the defense ran with it and didn't care what it did to him.
It's rather puzzling to me how the Goldman family could be so mad against OJ and his defense team instead of a racist cop who lost the prosecution the entire case.
@@lorir5728 Well whose fault is it that he's fuckin racist,was is somebody else on the tape spewing racist venom?........see that's America's problem,they're in this perpetual habit of covering up for racists and they feel as if a racist system no longer exists.
lolol This woman receives a monthly endowment of $15,000 in her remaining lifetime for her acting PERFORMANCE in this Staged Presentation.. Not bad 'eh? There are STILL people that bought this OJ Fiction Novel hook line & SINKER.
I do as well, but, the problem with the State was that they were overmatched, emotional and outclassed in that courtroom. They didn't have any slick hats in their office that they could wear.
So easy to blame the jury. Not the prosecution for playing into the defense’s hands, not the police for poorly handling evidence. No, blame the people who had to vote based on the evidence….
The Jury were home sick, and they desperately missing their kids, husband, & lacked entertainment, and good food! The nearly 1 year trial basically wore them down, can you understand what I am trying to say? OJ said that he loved her too much..
Fleeing in his white bronco? I get annoyed when these productions don't state the facts. How could he be fleeing in his white bronco if his white bronco was in police custody lol That was AC's white bronco. 😂
Park said nothing about him climbing over a wall. His testimony was that he watched him walk into the entrance of the home from the direction of the driveway.
@@Chauncey60 Park has always said he was walking into the house from the direction of the driveway. If you have proof otherwise…post it. It makes no sense for Park to say “I saw OJ climbing over the wall” when the gate was open and the Bronco was sitting outside that gate where it had not been 30-40 minutes earlier.
As much as i want you to be right, there is ZERO evidence of this, marcia would have been screaming this in her book, and you are everything that's wrong with ignorant commentary..... Ok, that last one was a little harsh, sorry dude. 😮💨😔
19 grown men in the prime of their lives didn’t simultaneously kill themselves either. Certainly not for eternity with a 72 year old Virgin. All Fictional stories have one thing in common. They’re Circular
You are not seeing the big picture here. Reasonable doubt. How about you watch this video again and actually listen to these experts in law that might help. Geez.
Can anyone else feel Marcia Clark’s lying in her opening statements saying she was looking to exclude the defendant. When ? How ??!! Piss n my face and tell me it’s just raining.
We watched the trial every day in 2nd and 3rd grade, we were all told money can buy you freedom from jail time for committing a crime - then, I watched the entire 400+ archived video during the lockdowns 25 years later and my jaw dropped at what I didn't see. I would have voted not guilty - - the PEOPLE who elected the mayor and council of LA and appointed sloppy enforcement and investigatory agents were not only liable but guilty of a criminal government syndicate resulting in a double homicide.
What aboutb6he jurors that put innocent people in jail...Should they also be charged? I think what you forget is this....The Prosecution said "They will prove BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT,that he did this"....The Defence had to just put some doubt into the Jury's heads that's all...And they did plenty of that.
The jurors were clearly unintelligent and/or racially bias but you can't do that. You can't charge jurors for being mentally retarded or racist. The jury's mental retardation and racist views should have been vetted by the prosecution before the trial.
1992 LA Rodney King LAPD court trial was supposed to be taking place in the middle.of the LA down town area but ironically this trial took place at the Simi valley area And 1995 oj simpson trial was sipposed to be taking place santa monica but it took place in the down town LA????? 1992 trial and 1995 oj simpson trial. The reason why these two court trial took place location wasn't the location it supposed to taking place in the first place was 1992 court trial needed Caucasian american jury members to winning the case and 1995 oj simpson court trial needed african american jury members to winning the case ???. HOW IS POSSIBLE THAT JUSTICE COUNTRY CAN DO THIS SUCH A THING?
I remember Christopher Darden saying when Simpson was found "not guilty" that eventually Simpson would be facing another trial this time Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman would be there and there wouldn't be a "dream team" of lawyers defending him. And with the news that Simpson is being treated for prostate cancer that "trial" may be coming sooner than he thinks.
@@cheery-hex yes it does, wrong is wrong no matter who does it if oj did it he deserves to be in jail, foreman destroyed the prosecution's case by lying under oath & denying he ever used racial remarks, & rodney king's controversy as well as the la riots & that little girl that was shot by a korean store owner as well as the corrupted cops case at the time unfortunately all had major effects on oj simpsons case ...
@@bustereagal3570 So how did OJs blood come to be a foot from Nicole’s body? Or, how did both victims blood come to be in OJs vehicle? Oh, and apparently Johnny slapped his wife around just like OJ.
@@bigdaddycool4242 I don't know if johnny slapped his wife & i don't know if oj had the victims blood on him all i know is he was aquitted in court ...
@@bustereagal3570 That doesn’t mean that you can’t do some digging and find out for yourself about that blood. And just because he was acquitted doesn’t mean that he is innocent.
The Defense proved Vanatter only booked 6.5ccs of the 8ccs OJ gave to the police on the 13th. Gary Segler testified in the Civil Trial that Vanatter demanded and received the blood of the victims from the coroners office on the 15th of June. Vanatter stayed on the force. No evidence from the crime scene was booked until the 16th. I wonder why. They proved Fuhrman planted the glove. He asked the crime scene photographer to take a picture of him pointing at the glove at Bundy before going to find the other one at Rockingham an hour later. Not the bloody shoe prints, the bloody car keys, the bloody pager, the bloody envelope or the bloody glasses. What so special about the glove? All the police testified that the picture was taken Fuhrman after arriving from Rockingham but the photographer's camera showed that it was the other way around. Isn't it remarkable that out of all those police at the crime scene it is reported that only Fuhrman took notes. Please!!!! Fuhrman lost his job but got another one with NBC. Criminalist Collin Yamauchi admitted on the stand that he was handling the gloves and OJ's reference at the same time and because the vial fell some blood got on the gloves. Criminalist Andrea Mazolla testified that when she took the blood swatches out of the drying chamber, she put them in bindles that she labeled with her initials. Why is this a problem? Because every bindle that arrived at CellMark to identify the DNA had Mazolla's initial on them except the ones that would later on be identified as having OJ's DNA. To make matters worse, the blood was seeping through the bindles. Which means those swatches weren't placed in a drying chamber. Which means those bindles were sealed by someone who was not a criminalist trained for collecting blood samples. Officer Kelly Muldorfer testified that she was in the Bronco on the 16th of June and didn't see any blood in it. The blood on the back gate didn't appear until July. The blood on OJ's sock didn't appear until August. The blood on the sock was very fishy not just because the time it appear but also because a reporter (Tracey Savage) reported in her column that it was Nicole's blood before it was even tested. So she knew it was Nicole's blood before Marcia Clarke. It was later discovered that she was having an affair with a captain in the force. The one that was the original public spokesman. The one with the thick, curly old timer's mustache. Not to mention, the blood type for the blood that the police couldn't get their hands on after the murders that was booked on the 13th didn't match Nicole's, Ron's or OJ's. The blood under Nicole's nails. The prosecution wouldn't even allow the pathologist (Dr. Irwin Golden) that did the autopsy to testify. He testified in the prelim that Ron was stabbed by 2 different types of knives. A single edged and double edged. The courts have sealed the phone records of the deceased and Nicole's mother. This like most documentaries. Edit, edit, edit and more edits until you have enough to point in one direction.
42:50 Haha!! I usually comment on DATING videos, and on the similar note, I refer to (I'm Japanese-American, male, and of course a nerd) Asian male simps as Ichiro, Takeshi, Chang, Joon Young, Tuan, and Khampheng!
If I was a black American at that time I would've been mortified. Idiots hugging and cheering at the acquittal of a double murderer who butchered two people, celebrating his release as if it was that of Nelson Mandela from a few years prior. Martin Luther King would be turning in his grave. Shameful stuff. Simpson was married to a white woman, was dating another white woman during the trial, lived in a white neighbourhood, golfed in a white golf club, was a darling of white corporate America, and never did anything for black rights in his life. The claim that the black people were cheering for Johnny Cochrane and not OJ is revisionist history at its worst, and a blatant attempt at trying to excuse their stupidty at the time.
EM. Speak for yourself. How do you think the non-blacks would have responded if he was found guilty? Do you think they would have cheered for his guilty verdict? I would love to hear your response.
@@andrerobinson2923 Ask yourself this: how do you think you and the rest of the black community would've reacted if the trial had played out EXACTLY the same, but OJ and Cochran had been white and Nicole, Ron and Fuhrman had been black and Fuhrman had consulted for a screenplay where he talked about "getting white motherfuckers, beating white motherfuckers, framing white motherfuckers"? Ask yourself that. Would you have cheered? Or would it have been another Rodney King/Latasha Harlins reaction? Think hard, gov.
You don't get it and you will never get it. Your response alone tells me you don't get it. it had to do with the fact that a black man won, it had nothing to do with the deaths of those individuals. if that was you in that chair would you be of the same mindset?
@@andrerobinson2923 There's nothing 'to get'. You can't celebrate a black man winning regardless of the fact that he clearly committed two horrific murders. Anybody with an ounce of intelligence would have known that it was highly inappropriate to be celebrating the Simpson' verdict. Trying to use him as a poster boy for civil rights waa laughable.
Every major city ready to riot....... He was forced to be found guilty..... Imagine the chaos , of riots and rage.... Could've started a civil war..... This was the best thing for our country at the time.....they got him later
It is very unfortunately to hearing from this motion pictures about the OJ simpson case I do not see any where from this case that looking for justice Justice is no longer exist in America
@@TDKiller415 Jack Sparrow did not assault that lying Bimbo Blonde...Amber faking and crying Crocodile tears and Sparrows attorney did a marvelous job defending Jack Sparrow...I've always loved Jack Sparrow, especially in the Role that Jack played as the outlaw John Dillinger..anyway, I'm elated that AKA jack Sparrow was Vindicated of all wrong doing.
You mean one of the greatest attorneys this country has ever seen. Remember he did his job and represented his client as the constitution states. He never was caught in a lie, a key detective was. Get over your butt hurt and respect a man who did his job without compromising his credibility.
@@rashun506 Even you could have convinced the Simpson jury that he was not guilty. There was a former black panther on the jury who gave Simpson the communist raised fist when Simpson was found not guilty. The jury was made up of racists, bigots, and unintelligent people who were judging the Rodney King case.
@@rashun506 I suppose you think Jussie Smollett was the victim of a hate crime. He paid two black men to rough him up and accused white people of committing a hate crime.
@@johndeagle4389 I'm a racist like Johnnie Cochran? What made Cochran a racist? The fact he was a lawyer who represented his client, and called out the incompetence of the LAPD, and a genocidal racist detective who admitted to manufacturing evidence during his useless career. Yeah Cochran sounds like the biggest racist that ever walked this earth.
Most people have slanted views on the evidence the jury heard or they never heard to begin with.Marcia Clark recently said if she was on the jury she would have voted the same in the end.😊😊
False equivalency. Fred Goldman isn’t racist and he has every right to be upset the murderer of his son got away with it. Anyone would feel that way regardless of race.
You're a heartless POS if you really wish that. If someone asked me this after my son had been brutally murdered, I would break their jaw and tell them "That's how I feel."
@@Ktaurus26 He didn't say Fred Goldman was a racist. He asked how do you think Emmitt Till's mother felt?. In other words black people had to deal with an unjust justice system for hundreds of years so the one time a black man who might have been guilty goes free is not the end of the world .
@@christiansoldier77 that still has absolutely nothing to with Fred Goldman at all. It’s a whataboutism and stupid. OJ himself hated black people, moved to Brentwood as far away from black folks as possible, married a white woman, had white kids, donated money to the LAPD numerous times and said “im not black, im OJ” amazing how people still defend his ass. Invoking black trauma into a rich man’s case who killed his ex wife and got away with it is not only stupid but disrespectful to every black family who lost someone from a hate crime/injustices. Y’all got to do better.
Furhman destory the prosecution's case. Period. I definitely believe OJ had something to do with the murders, but how it happened is more complex than we know. But the cops were idiots in this case. The prosecution had no chance from the start.
He wouldn’t be a “bloody mess” if he were standing over Nicole as she was face down or standing behind Ron when his wounds were inflicted. OJs blood is smeared all inside the Bronco. Nicole’s blood is on the driver’s side carpet and steering wheel.
@@travismaxwell9115 At Nicole’s condo going down the walkway. On the ground behind Nicole’s condo. Inside OJs Bronco. ( Steering wheel, center console,between seats and center console, drivers side carpet and in outside of driver side door). Outside OJs Bronco and leading into his home. On the floor in the foyer of his home. On his bathroom light switch. On the socks found on his bedroom floor. In his sink and shower drains. On a matching glove found behind his house. On an ac unit and ground wire behind his bungalows at his home.
I have always been bothered by several unanswered questions. If OJ committed the murder then : 1.) Where is the weapon 2,) Reportedly the scene was extremely bloody. What happened to OJ s bloody clothes and if covered with blood how could he have gotten into and driven his Bronco and police found few,small blood droplets . Why was the Bronco not splattered with blood. 3.) When officers arrived at the murder scene and realized the I'd of the victim . Their response, fail to call the coroner, failed to summon a technician to analyze the scene then leaving the scene, the officers went to OJs house to protect him. That's b.s. The cops had already convicted OJ and never sought to investigate other scenarios. In short the cops focused on OJ and ignored any other scenarios. It seems to me someone known to OJ committed the murder When OJ heard about it, he went to the scene to see what happened. I think the actual killer was close to OJ and OJ acted to protect the killer. Any way I believe the police committed a total error in their investigation.
Omg let me try to answer some questions for you let ne suggest you watch Vincent Bugliosi vs O. J. Simpson 100% guilty and he will answer every question you have... The Bronco did have quite bit blood in it blood smeared all over middle console and inside driver door but yes few drops on outside...
A witness saw O. J. Simpson at the airport with his arm up shoulder in trashcan then pulled it out zipped up little bag he had that wouldn't let anybody touch... The witness thought the murders happened after 11 so thought he could give Simpson an alibi called the defense.. The defense isn't stupid says we'll get right back to u never calls him again meanwhile 10 months later he sees what's going on in trial calls prosecution tells them what he saw.. They never used him
Also my guess would be they went to see O. J. Simpson he was a celebrity they probably wanted to meet a celebrity and in every murder husband /ex is always a suspect 9 outta 10 times it is spouse so they always look their first but they had no way to tell if O. J. had an airtight alibi was on camera somewhere if u plant evidence in a murder trial u can get death penalty vanadder served 27 or 37 years not one complaint lodged against him ever he was week away from retiring he's gonna risk his pension to fram o. J. Simpson someone who has powerful connections come on.... Furhman was 14th officer to get to crime scene every one of which not all of whom were white said there was only one glove so there was never a second glove for furhman to pick up and plant at rockingham... Not to mention months b4 furhman had found evidence to exonerate a black man (erik harris) charged with killing a white man and brought evidence to D. A. Got him freed sounds like someone whod risk his life to frame oj Simpson... He only had 4 complaints ever not a lot for 20 years
If you want answers to all your questions and more watch the documentary i said... The prosecution might have been worst there has ever been and i mean ever that's why you have so many questions
@@richgallagher5062 I don't trust the D.a. or any prosecutors as to what is truth and what is not. For example, the police would have you believe that when they contacted OJ in Chicago, he didn't ask if Nicole was deceased , yet in court police admitted OJ did indeed try to ask questions. Police would have you believe OJ was guilty because he never bothered to ask thereby insinuating that Simpson already knew. Of course it has been years but as I recall, there were only 2 or 3 exhibits introduced from the Bronco. Again, if the scene was so messy , the Bronco should have been full of evidence. It seems like I remember that the DA had like 96 samples of evidence to present but only introduced like 40. So did they intentionally hold on to evidence that did not fit their narrative ; evidence that the defense could have easily exploited. So the DA cited all this evidence but only aired a few. It is common for both sides to exploit evidence. Although a lie detector results is inadmissible in court, lawyers will mention that there was a lie detector test given. This causes questions for the jury and creates doubt.
No he didn't and actually that shows how little everybody actually knows about the evidence.... Tell me one piece of evidence to show O. J. Simpson was framed because i don't have enough time unless u really want me too but I could go over every single piece of evidence that the defense said was planted and show exactly why it would be impossible
And it was worst prosecution in American history maybe world history that's why he won not because of a frame up... If the prosecution was halfway decent they would've addressed the conspiracy theories that was the entire defense
@@richgallagher5062 That’s what I was pointing to. Mistakes in handling evidence, as well as ones by the prosecution and Judge Ito, created many holes for the defence to exploit and use to reverse what should have been a guaranteed win for the prosecution. It was not just the defence’s errors, but gifts from the LAPD and the prosecution that helped them seal the case. The late Mr. Bugliosi, who was the prosecutor that successfully convicted Charles Manson and co. with his team, summarized this well in this interview: ruclips.net/video/302dh1wxYzE/видео.html I think he also has a 3 hours+ breakdown of this somewhere on RUclips, as well
The prosecution said Nicole Simpson was killed first. Ron Goldman pulled off the left hand glove while fighting with his killer and Dr Spitz testified for the prosecution that the cuts on OJ Simpson's left finger was caused by acrylic fingernails
He Sacrificed his entire persona for this multi trillion dollar fairytale. Took one for the team. Kardashians yer New American Monarchy Keep on Believing your Television
Orenthal coming straight backFrom Chicago tells you that he was innocent. He cooperated the entire time even after the chase maintaining his innocence.
I heard somewhere that oj was and is so full of himself that to him putting that gun to his big A$$ head was holding himself hostage lol sounds bout right
I rly liked the older black men at the barbershop, but it’s also sad that they had accepted that a black man is always going to be just a black man, no matter how much money or power he has, as their reality. It’s very true and very telling.
@lynnloww5916 As a 43 years old Black man that is a very true and sad reality that no matter how intelligent, education, rich, famous, powerful any Black person is our race will always be looked as just n-words with intelligence, educations, money, fame & power by the majority (70%) of Caucasians. That is why Black people need to stop seeking white people's acceptance & approval because we will never get it even if or when they become race traitors sellouts.
Развлечения
This is hands down one of the best pieces on the OJ case I’ve seen and I’ve watched a ton of stuff on this subject. Thanks for the upload.
The best.
In view of your comment, I am not going to have it playing in the background but will come back and watch it properly when I can concentrate.
I disagree, it was garbage. As soon as they said the National Enquirer was required reading...then they played a montage of headlines. I've studied and watched the trial for 2 years and headline by headline I rattled off all the inaccuracies - if not OUTRIGHT LIES!
Try watching OJ25 on RUclips 25 episodes they go over everything
This is such garbage. Frontline is propaganda and this video is far from the truth.
I've been looking for this documentary for years. Please don't remove it!
ruclips.net/video/BF1W143j4Hs/видео.html
Is this the fronline documentary?
@@mgon4359 Yep, it is.
Download it now if you can. Because it will, like all good material on RUclips, eventually get removed.
@jimreily7538 I hate YT!
One of the most incisive analysis on the OJ case and its verdict. Kudos to the programme makers.
Frontline never fails.
The furhman tapes were a Gift for oj.
The forensic team was a gift. Yamauchi testified that he didn't believe he should change his gloves after spilling OJs reference sample on them. They testified that they were never even trained on handling DNA.
What's scary is there are so many people who couldn't afford to defend themselves from this crime lab.
The prosecutions ineptitude and subpar police work yielded the ultimate gift.
Ineptitude or not - you can watch an interview with one of the African American , female jurors who said the verdict was payback for Rodney King.
@@gman5-035 yeah Thats ur scapegoat, ignoring the 11 other jurors and their reasoning based off bad police work and planted evidence.
Jeffrey Toobin saying the defense team used the race card,so I guess Mark Fuhrman would be the dealer.
Faye was a drug addicted. Just don’t bring her up
42:00 minutes was honestly the best way to put this case the LA police framed a guilty man 😂
I can respect your statement
Those guys at the barbershop have some serious chemistry lol
Yep that's the best social gathering when discussing serious topics. You learn a lot. If Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman were both BLACK, not a huge issue. So, yes, it was about RACE.
It was a huge story S oj was absolutely belioved in America. A mega star accused of murdering 2 people going on the run and threatening suicide.
If it was 2 hookers would have been just as big of a story.
And you're "Right" Lol
We are like that in our communities all across these United States not an unusual occurrence. We good with ourselves whenever the devil isn’t involved.
@@jasonharris836 it was an issue because oj was famous.
How can you cheer when two people are dead ?
Because the justice system worked.
Because they were deceived.
It was more about sensationalism than the lives of two people
The police know that Nicole Brown Simpson was a cocaine addict!
, They knew that she hung around with the wrong people
You didn't know that !
I swear did you even watch this whole video. Both professors explaines the celebration at 44:07 and 42:50. Unless your the type too keep your head in your ass and isn't willing to listen to other people's opinions.
@@Supreme-gu1jz
It's the same opinion
A stereotype, that the black community thinks the same way
Which is untrue &
prejudicial
It also promotes that even slighted mishap, doesn't apply to black people, that commit crimes.
Because it happens too often.
There's a moral compass of taking responsibility for violent actions.
Watts Compton, Boyle Heights and Inglewood look that way for a reason !
Tubin is upset OJ got off. His anger is obvious.
who cares what Jeffrey "I like to jerk off in front of people on zoom" Toobin thinks? he's a closeted racist.
Understandably so. Ojs hands are dirty!! And cut!! 🔪
"I kept my underwear on!!!”- Alan Dershowitz
oh man it's too bad Dershowitz went batshit insane in recent years because he was damn good in the trial, I even read his book and liked it.
Not crazy at all. Simply put, he has the courage to call any situation like he sees it without being influenced by anyone or anything, whether they agree with him or they disagree and then suggest he’s “batshit crazy.” He’s one of the best constitutional scholars ever. Too bad that the weak minded can’t see that and because they don’t always agree make such ignorant references about him.
@@vonSoest the dude defended fucking Epstein, nuff said, only one ignorant here is you.
“It is the job of the defense attorney, especially when representing the guilty, to prevent by all lawful means, the truth from coming out.” -Alan Dershowitz ( _The Best Defense_ )
U snoozed? Dersh ain’t cray. Virginia was proven she lied
@@jayceewriter7826 no nazi troll
0:46 my man Jeffrey Toobin, the zoom provocateur
*vomits a little in mouth*
Still, the sum of a Frontline episode is greater than the Toobin part.
The brothas in the barber shop sent me yo 😂👏🏿👏🏿
Damn. Never knew Jeffrey Toobin was racist. Wtf
Still until this day the OJ Simpson trial exposes most people's true feelings.
This is why lawyers get the big bucks... they literally had a blood trail to follow
The system overcorrected by acquitting the least deserving person.
Yep a killer that slattered to folks
Exactly! 😢
This Fictional Story has generated over $3.3 Trillion Dollars past 33 years.
They wanted to make up for all the racial injustices but unfortunately this wasn't the way to do it
In the race war, the real victims, Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman remain ignored. Specially Ron Goldman. He was at the wrong place at wrong time. RIP.
Poor Ron, I that Ron should have been a little more savvy or Clever enough and should've anticipated ( enough natural born street wise) to realize that OJ and Nicole were still, ( although subtle) behind closed doors still lovers! I blame Nicole mostly.. Ron had to be so naive to not be aware of that...what was he thinking? She was basically still married...I wish Ron would've paid attention..
@@daviddavis3389 I hear you. OJ killed Nicole and Ron in the heat of the moment. Jury had months to go over evidence. But they chose to go along racial lines and had already made a decision within first couple of weeks. If it is not travesty of justice then what is. It was unfair to Ron's dad and sister. I curse those juries for what they did. They will never find peace in their life. They will absolutely 100% pay off their bad karma in their lifetime.
@@daviddavis3389
The divorce was not pronounced ?
Don’t understand these people wailing, crying, cheering, screaming praises over someone they don’t even know. That’s worship!
I feel the same way about Donald Trump 👍🏾
@@hotmamaw5634 Agree with you full heartedly there.
It's very clear you don't vote or watch football.
"Cus white people call rich black people what?" N.. a. That was funny as hell.
Facts 😅😂🤣
"we were clapping for johnny" damn straight!
johnnie saw how terrified and was'nt ready the prosecution and pounced them with all kinds of bs nonsense lol
Well I hope they enjoyed the rise in racial crimes and Prop 209 that Johnnie brought them 👏🏼👍🏻
@@sodapop83 They were called the Dream Team for good reason. Their defence was based on dreams and fantasies instead of facts and reality. All they did was prove Fuhrman used the n-word 8 years before and because of that they started saying "Maybe this, maybe that, maybe this, maybe that." 🤣🤣🤣 And the 🌍 of the 🐵🐵🐵 fell for it. Its disgusting but funny at the same time. Anyway, the racial suffering they're enduring these days, its on them. This verdict showed that they don't really deserve any better.
@@TDKiller415 Exactly. They believed Mark Fuhrman saying the N word was more important than the undeniable DNA evidence which proved Simpson was 100% guilty.
The defense didn't win the case, hge Prosecution lost the case...
Circular
2nd greatest story ever written…
Pure Fiction
The question still remains, if OJ and his defence truly believed the police planted evidence then why didn’t OJ sue to police force? A truly innocent man, whose reputation was tarnished, why didn’t he sue if he truly was innocent? I guess it doesn’t matter since OJ himself admitted in writing and in an interview that he did it, and yet people still believe he’s innocent.
Uh, b/c how'd that workout for Rodney King, police can be extremely vengeful and LA is a mobbed up town, not worth the risk
I doubt he had the money to at that point.
It's not exactly like O J. Since has made his character shine in righteousness. 300 shoes worldwide, and that foitprint was on the scene and belonged to O.J.
So now the label just changed : they stand gladly inadvertently with flawed personalities in vindication.
I never understood the 3 knocks heard by Kato. If OJ or someone else ran into the A/C unit behind his building why not just one thud ? Was he knocking for help ? And why did OJ ask him about change for McDonald's ? Setting up an alibi....
exactly or he was setting Kato up
@@nanalala9935 I think OJ Simpson was setting up Kato.
According to the defence theory, Fuhrman planted Kato there.
@@TDKiller415 According to the defence theory, Fuhrman also planted Kato Akita dog there.
@@johndeagle4389 With this amount of baseless "planting" allegations, you'd think Mark Fuhrman was a superhuman gardener 🤣🤣 Its easier to plant a billion seeds in each country in one single day than secretly planting a glove on a murder suspect while being watched by countless others.
OJ wasn't a B movie actor. Naked Gun???
Yes, he was nominated for an oscar for that role!😶🌫️
@@aethanfriday3568not being nominated doesn't mean you star in B movies.
I was born in Seattle in 1973, where I grew up. Japanese-American. Male. People ask me "Why does your race, birth place, birth year, and gender matter about anything?" Well, does THIS OJ case, and most of all, reactions to the verdict, answer that question? What if you were my opponent in a court case, and MY lawyers approached YOUR lawyers, and asked, "Would you agree to a jury, of 12 Japanese-American males?" I bet your lawyer would say "no way." Devil's Advocate: "People are people," and if you make your case, shouldn't these 12 Japanese-American males be objective, and rule in your favor? People can be in denial all they want. Race DOES affect how people think, including jurors. I DO think that Mark Fuhrman messed it up for the prosecution, and basically gifted the defense their case.
When pled the fith ..done deal.
Kangaroo court. Day of shame.
nah it was awesome how he got off
The jury was outstanding..they proved themselves to be brilliant and shrewd...they were like PHD decision makers...I was Sooo proud of that Jury!
@@daviddavis3389sarcasm?
@@jacksonteller3973was it?!?
@@aethanfriday3568 yes
Maybe if the prosecution/lapd wouldn't have lied,planting gloves and socks with edta on them. Denise Brown lying about OJ's demeanor at the dance recital and then showing OJ after the recital kissing her and her parents. They may have had a better chance of winning
Edta is found in almost all organic matter. It’s even in laundry detergent. I’m sure the LAPD also planted a shoe print of OJ’s Bruno Magli’s he lied about too right? 😂
Marcia Clark and Chris Darden too incompetents.
They had their case handed back to them by the Defense and showed them that they should not have tried OJ. They tried to present planted evidence as proof of his guilt.
@@andrerobinson2923 What was the planted evidence? Who planted it? What proof was there? What punishment did they get? Was it life in prison or the death penalty?
If there was truly any planted evidence, someone would've gone to the gas chamber or got life in prison, according to section 128 of the California Penal Code and the US constitution. I know to certain scumbags like Alan Dershowitz its a lie (he's buddies with Donald Trump, so yes, the constitution is a big lie for scum like them), but thats how it is.
So provide the planted evidence, the proof and the person who planted it. If you can't, stfu.
Actually they did a brilliant job at proving OJ's guilt.
But because of that clown Ito letting race become part of the trial, they weren't prepared to combat the bullshit allegations from Cochran and Bailey. And because those jurors had shit for brains, they only listened to the bullshit, not to the logic, because the bullshit was as close as those uneducated jurors could get to having a fine steak meal.
Marcia Clark was sharp but her failure came with the fact she wanted to do it all it herself!!! And its this reason she was incompetent.
@@vitocarbonara7770 She was competent and fantastic when it came to proving OJ was the sole perpetrator.
But incompetent when it came to countering the conspiracy theory claims, pointing put their big contradictions, and she even began villifying Fuhrman instead of standing up for him by citing him exonerating that black drug dealer Arrick Harris and then asking the jury to imagine if OJ and Cochran were white and Nicole, Ron and Fuhrman were black and the whole conspiracy theory hung on Fuhrman using racial slurs about whites. Marcia could've easily used the race card too to discredit Cochran and Bailey, but she didn't. That was her incompetence. But maybe that was also down to the circus ringmaster Ito who allowed race in the first place.
Johnny Cochran said he was going to call an expert who had a NOBEL PEACE PRIZE for CHEMISTRY. There is a Nobel Peace Prize and a Nobel Prize for Chemistry but there is no Nobel Peace Prize for Chemistry.
So which is it? You said in one sentence there is a Nobel Peace Prize for Chemistry, then you say in the next that there isn't?
@@kanyebreast6072 Please read again. There is a Nobel prize for peace. There is a Nobel Prize for chemistry.
Eh, if you talk for 300 days recorded you'll miss pronounce a few things. The person was Kari Mullis, inventor of PCR DNA testing who had stated that the DNA results from the prosecutor were total garbage.
@@hernandayolearyallda That was on the first day that Cochran spoke.
The presence of people like the woman at 29:00 in a country's educational system is scary to say the least. She is ethically condoning the use of a race card to divert attention from a murder case. Nobody is saying not to address police racism, as it needs to be addressed, but not at the expense of two families looking for justice. What happened is that all the evidence and Simpson's behaviour was pointing towards his guilt, and his defence team used the race card to capitalize on emotion that is irrelevant to the case to divert attention from the main point and ignite a fire in the jurors' hearts and minds. If she thinks that is ethically excusable because of unfairness of other cases' verdicts, then that is sickening to hear from someone who is supposed to be highly educated.
Did you even hear what Mrs. Crenshaw said? That is a defense attorneys job, undermine the credibility of witnesses and attempt to create reasonable doubt. Anything less than that would be judicial malpractice. Mrs. Crenshaw teaches law at Columbia University and UCLA, I highly doubt you would stand a snowballs chance in hell in the debate arena with her.
@@rashun506 Lets see you say that if someone you love is killed and the killer is released just because the black police detective happens to have said bad things about white people in the past.
@@TDKiller415 I'll cross that bridge if I ever come to it. The burden of proof is on the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime. And the defense created doubt in the jury's mind, that's all that matters. Respect our judicial process, respect our constitution, respect the jury.
The Galactico: You totally missed what this sister said. I mean it went right over your head. Let's place your ass in that chair where OJ sat and see if you still think the way you do. Again, you are not black so there you have it.
44:07
How come Mark Fuhrman hasn't been indicted,prosecute and thrown into prison.For his lies on the witness stand,in the O.J. case.
Because perjury is a minor crime. He didn't lie about anything huge.
What?@@usergodcandy777
why wasn't OJ sent to death row for murder ?
@@dltguitar6532 Why wasn't all these white officers killing unarm black people sent to death row for murder?
Fuhrman was the only conviction from the OJ case.
That barbershop footage is incredible.
Nothing will ever change until the mind-set changes
@@hotdogrelishTHIS🙌🏻
Furman slipped up in pre-trial and said them when referring to the gloves next to Ron Goldman's body, then immediately said it. Then, after a while, he drives to OJ's house, separates himself from the other cops, and finds his truck with blood on it. Then he hopes the fence will enter his home, talks to Kato, then disappears again and finds one glove in the back alley. The blood sample they collected from OJ was admittedly brought to the crime scene. If anyone thinks OJ is guilty, it's clear who you should be upset with, the idiots who framed him instead of trusting the process.
Really if you think he's innocent who do you think did it
@@coredadventure1i think the dude is saying they framed a guilty man. (I could be wrong but thats what i read)
@@coredadventure1
It was freakish circumstances where OJ did it but the lead detective was a racist who framed him, then committed perjury and took the fifth. Another cop took OJ's blood sample from the lad, with EDTA in it, and planted it. Then the incompetent prosecution had OJ try on the glove. That created reasonable doubt even though OJ probably did it. They blew the case.
@@aethanfriday3568I think you’re right.
I guess OJ’s Bruno Magli’s were also brought to the scene and used to make a footprint as well 😂
Justice system is not operating it suppose to be
Marsha Clark toasted the trial. She thought she was really clever having Mark Furhman at first.
What? You mean Marcia?
She really did. Once the defense had their turn with Furham it was all over. She knew her case was "floating out the window." That's why she tried to get Judge removed and then their own witness talked about the Judge' wife and other people. The jury couldn't wait to render their decision.
@@joecook5689 No
Ben, like you, I too, discovered how the Jury did not like either of them especially Marcia Clark. She thought she was too smart for her own good. Other experienced Attorneys thought she walked around like a Peacock and ended up looking like an ass at the end of the trial.
She did right by putting Fuhrman on the stand. What was wrong was Ito allowing race into the trial and then Marcia and Darden not instructing Fuhrman to be truthful if he was asked about using the n-word and to publicly apologise for it. Then there would be no need for any tapes to prove him wrong, because he already told the truth and apologised. He would've made a fool of Bailey that way.
Does anybody ever wonder since OJ so easily killed two people how many others he killed or do you think Nicole just brought it out of him cuz he was so obsessed
The later...no doubt.
Are you thinking that he may be a serial killer? No, I do not Concur with your thought...absurb., ridiculous.
@@daviddavis3389
I can't be proven, that Simpson murdered the mother of his innocent children
Without being an insanity plea
My sentiments regarding Mark Furhman.
Nicole was obsessing with OJ..He was so do with her already... You've got it wrong.
This verdict was a product of its time and place (untrustworthy LAPD, LA riots, downtown jury, judicial incompetence, prosecutorial errors). What amazes me is the same talking heads from 20 years ago go on TV and spout the same lines from back then given the EXTRA revelations from the later civil trial (see OJs face with the photos and those ‘ugly ass shoes’) he was held up as a civil rights martyr but he never was one. After that Vegas robbery we all saw his narcissistic willingness to flout the law for his own ends and I’m glad he got at least some jail time.
I'm amazed that people still don't realize how faulty the DNA evidence was during that trial. It's Stephen Avery x1000.
There's zero chance that you actually listen to the defense arguments and not have reasonable doubt. So many immediately dismiss it and that's a shame.
I'm glad he's out and living his best life 😂😂😂
@@corajones1980 me too. these broads out here need to be put in their place. rest in power, juice
@@corajones1980 did you flag my comment? how strong and independent you must be
@@corajones1980 what a difference 30 years makes doesn't it you dizzy @$$ non thinking @$$ broad lolololololol!
I am from England, looking back on this case in 2023, having done research I believe O J was the killer. I would like to know what his status is today?
It's Always Been The Same.
He took His Anger Out On Nicole..
Paula Broke Up w/Him...He Wasn't Invited To The Celebration Of The Dance Recital...'
No One Says NO to OJ Nicole You Fucking Bitch!!!! I Gave You EVERYTHING!!!!'
And He Killed What Hurt Him The Most...
He's alive spent some time in jail
He's dead now
I thi k he's guilty
I'm from London UK 🇬🇧
He is effing DEAD.
I dont think he killed them but he either knows who did it or was at the scene after the fact to confirm they were indeed dead. Many other leads that the FBI ignored could have shed some light on who did it.
The brown family should’ve sued the LAPD for not arresting oj after the 8x that Nicole had to call the police on him for domestic abuse smh !!
That is another angle that should have been considered. Thanks Poochie. Much Love.
@@andrerobinson2923 The Browns wouldn't dare touch OJ because they were making tons of money off him, since OJ had convinced Nicole's father to invest in a lucrative Hertz dealership that made Nicole's family very rich. Nicole's father even said he was happy with the "not guilty" verdict. You expect someone like HIM to sue anyone for not protecting his daughter?
Normal fathers send someone like OJ to intensive care after the first black eye on their daughter. Lou and Juditha Brown were a pair of evil, uncaring gold diggers, and I hope they're rotting in hell with Cochran and Bailey.
@@TDKiller415 terrible thing to say dragon killer...why put down the dead?
@@daviddavis3389 Because its the truth. A sad truth. At least I'm not the one calling Nicole and Ron drug addicts who got what they deserved, that was the long cast of the POTA franchise who acquitted OJ and cheered for him.
They couldn't because there was no abuse! Just a coked out woman using the police when she got mad. Oj showed great restraint in the face of what she was doing. At this point in time, every adult man should know that 99% of women's claims are a lie, and they have created an environment where they can start fights and then play the victim. It's disgusting. And you being a man espousing feminist propaganda is even more disgusting. Use your brain! There's only evidence of one physical fight, in which they both hit each other. So she's just as guilty of domestic abuse as him
That side eye 😂 1:52
Sad. Verdict.
I’m not a law student or a lawyer/attorney, but I understand the role of the lawyers and prosecution... Technically speaking, I understand the verdict and the jury saying that they were not convinced with the reasonable doubt... That Furhman thing and Dennis Fung sloppy clean-up of the crime scene caused a monkey wrench causing the doubt... Looking back in my heart, I felt the Rodney King Verdict and the OJ Verdict were both wrong
That Mark Fuhrman thing. It’s not that hard to believe that a white police officer framed a black man. Mark Furman admitted to frame many black men. What are you talking about?
@@daffyduckfan4478 Well he pleaded the 5th, so that messed things up for sure...
@@Nike5221 White people could sit there and like blind to it all that they want too but they know how police truly are when it comes down to Black people.
@@daffyduckfan4478 That is true... It's hard to empathize with the black race when discrimination is involved when you operate out of the lense of a White Person
@@Nike5221 Black people do not need any form of empathy from a white.
Seeing white folks reactions that day was priceless i think they may have gotten an idea of how blks felt when All those klans men walked back in the day when all white juries voted not guilty.
Ok I'm not racist at all and think it's disgusting that white jurors would aquit anybody for murder that is obviously guilty over race or anything... But don't you think that doing the same thing makes you just as bad as white people that have acquitted other whites...
What an ignorant remark that is.
@@eamonnmaccionnaith5761
Ignorant perhaps, true however.
The truth sucks doesn't it ?
Think you're a big tough guy for typing that?
Instead of spitting on innocent whites, grow a pair of balls, buy some guts and go fight for the black community by getting a gun and storming the headquarters of the armed white supremacists. See how long you last. Until then, stfu.
@@davidfigueroa6351 It also sucks that those OJ-supporting savages were so petty, weak, insecure, cowardly and gutless that they cheered for Nicole and Ron, two innocent whites, being butchered by a black man and then denied justice instead of arming themselves and storming the headquarters of their real racist enemies such as heavily-armed white supremacist groups.
In the words of Stannis Baratheon, hard truths cut both ways, eh Dave?
cheers
I love how basically everyone, whether black or white, agrees that he'd be in jail if he had killed a black woman lol
These pathetic defence lawyers saying peoples reaction surprised them. People didn’t hate you coz you did your job as a lawyer but because you manipulated a trial with race and other antics and crossed all ethics and stoop so low it was unbelievable
So you believe it's manipulative and unethical for a defense attorney to call out a key witness for their blatant racism?
@@rashun506 When its irrelevant to the case and is a decade old and used mainly for a fictional screenplay, then yes it is. Would you agree if the skin colours had been reversed and Fuhrman had used the term "white motherfuckers"? Would you still agree if that same tactic was used to acquit someone who raped and butchered your daughter?
My guess is no. You can say that you'll "cross that bridge when you get there", but to me thats a way of saying you wouldn't agree.
no they did not nazi troll
Oj is innocent.
@@rashun506 It is unethical of them to accuse Vannatter of planting evidence when they have absolutely no proof of it. At the time of the murders he had served 28 years in the force without a singe complaint and was getting ready to retire but he apparently he was willing to risk his career and the death penalty because he wanted to frame OJ? That makes no sense but the defense ran with it and didn't care what it did to him.
It's rather puzzling to me how the Goldman family could be so mad against OJ and his defense team instead of a racist cop who lost the prosecution the entire case.
Soooooooooooo true
Because OJ killed his son
Because Fuhrman had nothing to do with killing Ron. Oj killed him.
@@lorir5728 Well whose fault is it that he's fuckin racist,was is somebody else on the tape spewing racist venom?........see that's America's problem,they're in this perpetual habit of covering up for racists and they feel as if a racist system no longer exists.
@@lorir5728Actually OJ was found innocent 🤷♂️🤷♂️ He didn't kill anyone
28:00 that lady is Totally correct
lolol This woman receives a monthly endowment of $15,000 in her remaining lifetime for her acting PERFORMANCE in this Staged Presentation.. Not bad 'eh? There are STILL people that bought this OJ Fiction Novel hook line & SINKER.
You dont have to be genus to know that they screwed up whe Marcia clark relied on mark furman the racist
BULL SHIT ..sorry but i belive that o.j.did it !!!!!
I do as well, but, the problem with the State was that they were overmatched, emotional and outclassed in that courtroom. They didn't have any slick hats in their office that they could wear.
nah
That Jury, all of them, are a waste of oxygen for the planet. Disgusting people
What about the RODNEY KING JURY??
So easy to blame the jury. Not the prosecution for playing into the defense’s hands, not the police for poorly handling evidence. No, blame the people who had to vote based on the evidence….
Including the white/affluent grand jury who did not indict him? Look at you, thinking you know more than those who heard the EVIDENCE.
Disagree
The Jury were home sick, and they desperately missing their kids, husband, & lacked entertainment, and good food! The nearly 1 year trial basically wore them down, can you understand what I am trying to say? OJ said that he loved her too much..
Fleeing in his white bronco?
I get annoyed when these productions don't state the facts. How could he be fleeing in his white bronco if his white bronco was in police custody lol
That was AC's white bronco. 😂
Alan Park saw OJ climb over the wall and the defense managed to prevent that testimony.
JUDGE ITO FUCKED UP THIS CASE
Park said nothing about him climbing over a wall. His testimony was that he watched him walk into the entrance of the home from the direction of the driveway.
@@bigdaddycool4242 you should read my comment again. Park didn’t testify to that In court but he did tell that to the defense
@@Chauncey60
Park has always said he was walking into the house from the direction of the driveway. If you have proof otherwise…post it.
It makes no sense for Park to say “I saw OJ climbing over the wall” when the gate was open and the Bronco was sitting outside that gate where it had not been 30-40 minutes earlier.
As much as i want you to be right, there is ZERO evidence of this, marcia would have been screaming this in her book, and you are everything that's wrong with ignorant commentary.....
Ok, that last one was a little harsh, sorry dude. 😮💨😔
Innocent men dont run
19 grown men in the prime of their lives didn’t simultaneously kill themselves either.
Certainly not for eternity with a 72 year old Virgin.
All Fictional stories have one thing in common.
They’re Circular
Sometimes they do !!!
You are not seeing the big picture here. Reasonable doubt. How about you watch this video again and actually listen to these experts in law that might help. Geez.
I have no idea racism kingdom like a America rely on jury sytem to making a decision guilty or not guilty
Can anyone else feel Marcia Clark’s lying in her opening statements saying she was looking to exclude the defendant. When ? How ??!! Piss n my face and tell me it’s just raining.
We watched the trial every day in 2nd and 3rd grade, we were all told money can buy you freedom from jail time for committing a crime - then, I watched the entire 400+ archived video during the lockdowns 25 years later and my jaw dropped at what I didn't see. I would have voted not guilty - - the PEOPLE who elected the mayor and council of LA and appointed sloppy enforcement and investigatory agents were not only liable but guilty of a criminal government syndicate resulting in a double homicide.
Only delusional, stupid, nitwits believe that O.J. Simpson didn't murder Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman!
This is Top 5 biggest hoaxes in America 🇺🇸 history.
😂 lol 😂 lol 😂 lol 😂 funny
@@ozten-fj6pe .You obviously fit the category of idiotically stupid nitwits perfectly!
A 2 or 3 year old watching a trial
All the juror's should have been charged they did not do the job. Payback should come with charges
What aboutb6he jurors that put innocent people in jail...Should they also be charged?
I think what you forget is this....The Prosecution said "They will prove BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT,that he did this"....The Defence had to just put some doubt into the Jury's heads that's all...And they did plenty of that.
@@proudlysouthafrican4368 exactly
What about the RODNEY KING jury??
The jurors were clearly unintelligent and/or racially bias but you can't do that. You can't charge jurors for being mentally retarded or racist. The jury's mental retardation and racist views should have been vetted by the prosecution before the trial.
No the police that lied and screwed up the whole investigation should be arrested smh
1992 LA Rodney King LAPD court trial was supposed to be taking place in the middle.of the LA down town area but ironically this trial took place at the Simi valley area
And 1995 oj simpson trial was sipposed to be taking place santa monica but it took place in the down town LA?????
1992 trial and 1995 oj simpson trial.
The reason why these two court trial took place location wasn't the location it supposed to taking place in the first place was 1992 court trial needed Caucasian american jury members to winning the case and 1995 oj simpson court trial needed african american jury members to winning the case ???.
HOW IS POSSIBLE THAT JUSTICE COUNTRY CAN DO THIS SUCH A THING?
I remember Christopher Darden saying when Simpson was found "not guilty" that eventually Simpson would be facing another trial this time Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman would be there and there wouldn't be a "dream team" of lawyers defending him. And with the news that Simpson is being treated for prostate cancer that "trial" may be coming sooner than he thinks.
50:10 best speech I’ve heard in a long time!
no Solo
From africa am so glad that oj was acquitted & i hope our people in america always win against racist people r.i.p. Johnny 🌹
what if the racist person is innocent? does that matter?
@@cheery-hex yes it does, wrong is wrong no matter who does it if oj did it he deserves to be in jail, foreman destroyed the prosecution's case by lying under oath & denying he ever used racial remarks, & rodney king's controversy as well as the la riots & that little girl that was shot by a korean store owner as well as the corrupted cops case at the time unfortunately all had major effects on oj simpsons case ...
@@bustereagal3570
So how did OJs blood come to be a foot from Nicole’s body?
Or, how did both victims blood come to be in OJs vehicle?
Oh, and apparently Johnny slapped his wife around just like OJ.
@@bigdaddycool4242 I don't know if johnny slapped his wife & i don't know if oj had the victims blood on him all i know is he was aquitted in court ...
@@bustereagal3570
That doesn’t mean that you can’t do some digging and find out for yourself about that blood.
And just because he was acquitted doesn’t mean that he is innocent.
Imagine that the juice killed more people than their Charles Manson. 🤣🏈
The Defense proved Vanatter only booked 6.5ccs of the 8ccs OJ gave to the police on the 13th. Gary Segler testified in the Civil Trial that Vanatter demanded and received the blood of the victims from the coroners office on the 15th of June. Vanatter stayed on the force. No evidence from the crime scene was booked until the 16th. I wonder why.
They proved Fuhrman planted the glove. He asked the crime scene photographer to take a picture of him pointing at the glove at Bundy before going to find the other one at Rockingham an hour later. Not the bloody shoe prints, the bloody car keys, the bloody pager, the bloody envelope or the bloody glasses. What so special about the glove? All the police testified that the picture was taken Fuhrman after arriving from Rockingham but the photographer's camera showed that it was the other way around. Isn't it remarkable that out of all those police at the crime scene it is reported that only Fuhrman took notes. Please!!!! Fuhrman lost his job but got another one with NBC.
Criminalist Collin Yamauchi admitted on the stand that he was handling the gloves and OJ's reference at the same time and because the vial fell some blood got on the gloves.
Criminalist Andrea Mazolla testified that when she took the blood swatches out of the drying chamber, she put them in bindles that she labeled with her initials. Why is this a problem? Because every bindle that arrived at CellMark to identify the DNA had Mazolla's initial on them except the ones that would later on be identified as having OJ's DNA. To make matters worse, the blood was seeping through the bindles. Which means those swatches weren't placed in a drying chamber. Which means those bindles were sealed by someone who was not a criminalist trained for collecting blood samples.
Officer Kelly Muldorfer testified that she was in the Bronco on the 16th of June and didn't see any blood in it.
The blood on the back gate didn't appear until July.
The blood on OJ's sock didn't appear until August.
The blood on the sock was very fishy not just because the time it appear but also because a reporter (Tracey Savage) reported in her column that it was Nicole's blood before it was even tested. So she knew it was Nicole's blood before Marcia Clarke. It was later discovered that she was having an affair with a captain in the force. The one that was the original public spokesman. The one with the thick, curly old timer's mustache.
Not to mention, the blood type for the blood that the police couldn't get their hands on after the murders that was booked on the 13th didn't match Nicole's, Ron's or OJ's.
The blood under Nicole's nails.
The prosecution wouldn't even allow the pathologist (Dr. Irwin Golden) that did the autopsy to testify. He testified in the prelim that Ron was stabbed by 2 different types of knives. A single edged and double edged.
The courts have sealed the phone records of the deceased and Nicole's mother.
This like most documentaries. Edit, edit, edit and more edits until you have enough to point in one direction.
Slattered them to
42:50 Haha!! I usually comment on DATING videos, and on the similar note, I refer to (I'm Japanese-American, male, and of course a nerd) Asian male simps as Ichiro, Takeshi, Chang, Joon Young, Tuan, and Khampheng!
If I was a black American at that time I would've been mortified. Idiots hugging and cheering at the acquittal of a double murderer who butchered two people, celebrating his release as if it was that of Nelson Mandela from a few years prior. Martin Luther King would be turning in his grave. Shameful stuff.
Simpson was married to a white woman, was dating another white woman during the trial, lived in a white neighbourhood, golfed in a white golf club, was a darling of white corporate America, and never did anything for black rights in his life.
The claim that the black people were cheering for Johnny Cochrane and not OJ is revisionist history at its worst, and a blatant attempt at trying to excuse their stupidty at the time.
EM. Speak for yourself. How do you think the non-blacks would have responded if he was found guilty? Do you think they would have cheered for his guilty verdict? I would love to hear your response.
@@andrerobinson2923 I'm sure they would have been delighted, and rightly so, as the guy was as guilty as sin.
@@andrerobinson2923 Ask yourself this: how do you think you and the rest of the black community would've reacted if the trial had played out EXACTLY the same, but OJ and Cochran had been white and Nicole, Ron and Fuhrman had been black and Fuhrman had consulted for a screenplay where he talked about "getting white motherfuckers, beating white motherfuckers, framing white motherfuckers"? Ask yourself that. Would you have cheered? Or would it have been another Rodney King/Latasha Harlins reaction? Think hard, gov.
You don't get it and you will never get it. Your response alone tells me you don't get it. it had to do with the fact that a black man won, it had nothing to do with the deaths of those individuals. if that was you in that chair would you be of the same mindset?
@@andrerobinson2923 There's nothing 'to get'. You can't celebrate a black man winning regardless of the fact that he clearly committed two horrific murders. Anybody with an ounce of intelligence would have known that it was highly inappropriate to be celebrating the Simpson' verdict. Trying to use him as a poster boy for civil rights waa laughable.
I think Carl Douglas made the most true statement, he said "had O.J. been accused of murdering his first wife, I wouldn't be here" That's Real Shit!
One of the best analysis on the OJ case and the verdict.
Carl Douglas paid $40,000,000 to date from this EPIC award winning fairy tale.
😂
Americans love Gossip and Fiction
Every major city ready to riot.......
He was forced to be found guilty.....
Imagine the chaos , of riots and rage....
Could've started a civil war.....
This was the best thing for our country at the time.....they got him later
The verdict and the reaction to it proved to me that black people really are different than regular Americans.
It is very unfortunately to hearing from this motion pictures about the OJ simpson case
I do not see any where from this case that looking for justice
Justice is no longer exist in America
I hope the recent Amber Heard case changed your mind a little. The UK trial was the sham.
@@TDKiller415 Jack Sparrow did not assault that lying Bimbo Blonde...Amber faking and crying Crocodile tears and Sparrows attorney did a marvelous job defending Jack Sparrow...I've always loved Jack Sparrow, especially in the Role that Jack played as the outlaw John Dillinger..anyway, I'm elated that AKA jack Sparrow was Vindicated of all wrong doing.
@@daviddavis3389 I know. Justice was served, unlike in the OJ case.
This is by far the most worst judgment ever! I hope the jurors can sleep at night!
Me either they shouod be ashamed of thereselfs
I’m sleeping snuggled and warm
@@xxxbrooklyn So nice to hear! But was talking about the people on the jury! I know your not one because they are all ashamed to be seen or heard!
@@kjnest they are enjoying life!! Even OJ is chipping away at the golf course
bullshit, it was the best judgement ever, you are basically calling all the juryers imcompentant idiots with that statement
Nobody talks about...jeffery dahlmer... Mendendez bros.. the guy that killed those kids in Connecticut
They were all convicted.
Was the LAPD perfect in handling the evidence NOPE is OJ guilty YEP
Murderer got away, they celebrated.
If I was the goldmans or browns well I'll not say
Innocent black man got away, they got angry.
Biggest liar in history at 12:26.
You mean one of the greatest attorneys this country has ever seen. Remember he did his job and represented his client as the constitution states. He never was caught in a lie, a key detective was. Get over your butt hurt and respect a man who did his job without compromising his credibility.
@@rashun506 I'll bet you are a racist like Cochran.
@@rashun506 Even you could have convinced the Simpson jury that he was not guilty. There was a former black panther on the jury who gave Simpson the communist raised fist when Simpson was found not guilty. The jury was made up of racists, bigots, and unintelligent people who were judging the Rodney King case.
@@rashun506 I suppose you think Jussie Smollett was the victim of a hate crime. He paid two black men to rough him up and accused white people of committing a hate crime.
@@johndeagle4389 I'm a racist like Johnnie Cochran? What made Cochran a racist? The fact he was a lawyer who represented his client, and called out the incompetence of the LAPD, and a genocidal racist detective who admitted to manufacturing evidence during his useless career. Yeah Cochran sounds like the biggest racist that ever walked this earth.
Most people have slanted views on the evidence the jury heard or they never heard to begin with.Marcia Clark recently said if she was on the jury she would have voted the same in the end.😊😊
Why didn't they just pit the bronco out on the freeway?.....I'll tell you why,,, the same reason he was found innocent....TO KEEP THE PIECE
I wish somebody had asked Ron Goldman's dad: How do you think Emmet Tills mother felt when her son's killers were acquitted?
False equivalency. Fred Goldman isn’t racist and he has every right to be upset the murderer of his son got away with it. Anyone would feel that way regardless of race.
You're a heartless POS if you really wish that. If someone asked me this after my son had been brutally murdered, I would break their jaw and tell them "That's how I feel."
@@Ktaurus26 He didn't say Fred Goldman was a racist. He asked how do you think Emmitt Till's mother felt?. In other words black people had to deal with an unjust justice system for hundreds of years so the one time a black man who might have been guilty goes free is not the end of the world .
@@christiansoldier77 that still has absolutely nothing to with Fred Goldman at all. It’s a whataboutism and stupid. OJ himself hated black people, moved to Brentwood as far away from black folks as possible, married a white woman, had white kids, donated money to the LAPD numerous times and said “im not black, im OJ” amazing how people still defend his ass. Invoking black trauma into a rich man’s case who killed his ex wife and got away with it is not only stupid but disrespectful to every black family who lost someone from a hate crime/injustices. Y’all got to do better.
@@Ktaurus26& Emmett Tills mom had the right to feel that same anger. How do you know what is in Fred Goldman's heart & mind.
Furhman destory the prosecution's case. Period. I definitely believe OJ had something to do with the murders, but how it happened is more complex than we know. But the cops were idiots in this case. The prosecution had no chance from the start.
You 100% fooling yourself…
This Story is Fiction
D U H
I bet there thinking differently now,
How do u know if a cop is lying? His mouth is moving. There not called the finest for nothing. Finest Liars
Oj would have been a bloody mess, when or if he would of gotten back in that Bronco, where's the BLOOD?😮
He wouldn’t be a “bloody mess” if he were standing over Nicole as she was face down or standing behind Ron when his wounds were inflicted.
OJs blood is smeared all inside the Bronco. Nicole’s blood is on the driver’s side carpet and steering wheel.
lol 😂 lol 😂 lol 😂 lol 😂
You been Hood Winking you self…
This is complete nonsense.
This story is fiction
@@bigdaddycool4242where's the BLOOD?????
@@travismaxwell9115
At Nicole’s condo going down the walkway.
On the ground behind Nicole’s condo.
Inside OJs Bronco. ( Steering wheel, center console,between seats and center console, drivers side carpet and in outside of driver side door).
Outside OJs Bronco and leading into his home.
On the floor in the foyer of his home.
On his bathroom light switch.
On the socks found on his bedroom floor.
In his sink and shower drains.
On a matching glove found behind his house.
On an ac unit and ground wire behind his bungalows at his home.
@@travismaxwell9115 there was blood found in the bronco you buffoon
I have always been bothered by several unanswered questions. If OJ committed the murder then : 1.) Where is the weapon 2,) Reportedly the scene was extremely bloody. What happened to OJ s bloody clothes and if covered with blood how could he have gotten into and driven his Bronco and police found few,small blood droplets . Why was the Bronco not splattered with blood. 3.) When officers arrived at the murder scene and realized the I'd of the victim . Their response, fail to call the coroner, failed to summon a technician to analyze the scene then leaving the scene, the officers went to OJs house to protect him. That's b.s. The cops had already convicted OJ and never sought to investigate other scenarios. In short the cops focused on OJ and ignored any other scenarios. It seems to me someone known to OJ committed the murder When OJ heard about it, he went to the scene to see what happened. I think the actual killer was close to OJ and OJ acted to protect the killer. Any way I believe the police committed a total error in their investigation.
Omg let me try to answer some questions for you let ne suggest you watch Vincent Bugliosi vs O. J. Simpson 100% guilty and he will answer every question you have... The Bronco did have quite bit blood in it blood smeared all over middle console and inside driver door but yes few drops on outside...
A witness saw O. J. Simpson at the airport with his arm up shoulder in trashcan then pulled it out zipped up little bag he had that wouldn't let anybody touch... The witness thought the murders happened after 11 so thought he could give Simpson an alibi called the defense.. The defense isn't stupid says we'll get right back to u never calls him again meanwhile 10 months later he sees what's going on in trial calls prosecution tells them what he saw.. They never used him
Also my guess would be they went to see O. J. Simpson he was a celebrity they probably wanted to meet a celebrity and in every murder husband /ex is always a suspect 9 outta 10 times it is spouse so they always look their first but they had no way to tell if O. J. had an airtight alibi was on camera somewhere if u plant evidence in a murder trial u can get death penalty vanadder served 27 or 37 years not one complaint lodged against him ever he was week away from retiring he's gonna risk his pension to fram o. J. Simpson someone who has powerful connections come on.... Furhman was 14th officer to get to crime scene every one of which not all of whom were white said there was only one glove so there was never a second glove for furhman to pick up and plant at rockingham... Not to mention months b4 furhman had found evidence to exonerate a black man (erik harris) charged with killing a white man and brought evidence to D. A. Got him freed sounds like someone whod risk his life to frame oj Simpson... He only had 4 complaints ever not a lot for 20 years
If you want answers to all your questions and more watch the documentary i said... The prosecution might have been worst there has ever been and i mean ever that's why you have so many questions
@@richgallagher5062 I don't trust the D.a. or any prosecutors as to what is truth and what is not. For example, the police would have you believe that when they contacted OJ in Chicago, he didn't ask if Nicole was deceased , yet in court police admitted OJ did indeed try to ask questions. Police would have you believe OJ was guilty because he never bothered to ask thereby insinuating that Simpson already knew. Of course it has been years but as I recall, there were only 2 or 3 exhibits introduced from the Bronco. Again, if the scene was so messy , the Bronco should have been full of evidence. It seems like I remember that the DA had like 96 samples of evidence to present but only introduced like 40. So did they intentionally hold on to evidence that did not fit their narrative ; evidence that the defense could have easily exploited. So the DA cited all this evidence but only aired a few. It is common for both sides to exploit evidence. Although a lie detector results is inadmissible in court, lawyers will mention that there was a lie detector test given. This causes questions for the jury and creates doubt.
Disgusting and sad.
Those barbershop brothas was so wromg about MJ & those who will comment, do your research
Student at 42:07 nailed it
Absolutely. That defense team was pretty much flawless
@@LaMostraVia Combined with dreadful prosecution work, it was the dream trial for Mr. Simpson
No he didn't and actually that shows how little everybody actually knows about the evidence.... Tell me one piece of evidence to show O. J. Simpson was framed because i don't have enough time unless u really want me too but I could go over every single piece of evidence that the defense said was planted and show exactly why it would be impossible
And it was worst prosecution in American history maybe world history that's why he won not because of a frame up... If the prosecution was halfway decent they would've addressed the conspiracy theories that was the entire defense
@@richgallagher5062 That’s what I was pointing to. Mistakes in handling evidence, as well as ones by the prosecution and Judge Ito, created many holes for the defence to exploit and use to reverse what should have been a guaranteed win for the prosecution. It was not just the defence’s errors, but gifts from the LAPD and the prosecution that helped them seal the case. The late Mr. Bugliosi, who was the prosecutor that successfully convicted Charles Manson and co. with his team, summarized this well in this interview: ruclips.net/video/302dh1wxYzE/видео.html I think he also has a 3 hours+ breakdown of this somewhere on RUclips, as well
All I Can Say Is "OJ DID IT" 💯💯💯💯
Watch a documentary by William Dear. Is OJ innocent?
@van2dan Yes I Am
@van2dan Pretty good man DM me on IG I'll give you my number @7th_sign_fitness
@van2dan no my email address is csolo1971@yahoo.com
The prosecution said Nicole Simpson was killed first. Ron Goldman pulled off the left hand glove while fighting with his killer and Dr Spitz testified for the prosecution that the cuts on OJ Simpson's left finger was caused by acrylic fingernails
Know you know how emmitt till's mama feels
16:27
Glad for OJ
He Sacrificed his entire persona for this multi trillion dollar fairytale.
Took one for the team.
Kardashians yer New American Monarchy
Keep on Believing your Television
The bronco chase tells you that he was guilty
Orenthal coming straight backFrom Chicago tells you that he was innocent. He cooperated the entire time even after the chase maintaining his innocence.
@@daffyduckfan4478 oj was not innocent he was guilty and his time is coming
@@benadek6703 How do you figure¿
Doesn’t mean anything
@@deoglemnaco7025 innocent people run away
I was in grade 8 and we watched the verdict in school.
12:19 ..Why did macia clark dress like Quaker oates wife?
Maybe she loves Quakers Oates?
I heard somewhere that oj was and is so full of himself that to him putting that gun to his big A$$ head was holding himself hostage lol sounds bout right
I rly liked the older black men at the barbershop, but it’s also sad that they had accepted that a black man is always going to be just a black man, no matter how much money or power he has, as their reality. It’s very true and very telling.
@lynnloww5916 As a 43 years old Black man that is a very true and sad reality that no matter how intelligent, education, rich, famous, powerful any Black person is our race will always be looked as just n-words with intelligence, educations, money, fame & power by the majority (70%) of Caucasians.
That is why Black people need to stop seeking white people's acceptance & approval because we will never get it even if or when they become race traitors sellouts.
WP was mad as hell.
Both the public and the jury were polarized along racial lines
This set blacks back and the new stuff that came out in recent years made them look worst
Jason simpson did it.
So Ryan, you sound like an expert in " Black folks"...that true Mr Ryan?
@@daviddavis3389 How could people be so biased because of the color of there skin