*👉Checkout Previous Compilation:* ruclips.net/video/PkasfB1ItkE/видео.html *👉Submit your Dashcam video for the feature:* forms.gle/dMhP9qznKL11NLii6 *👉Or sent to Email:* megadrivingschoolyt@gmail.com *👉Recommended best value dashcam:* bit.ly/2GAF2GZ
@@zaiyou9952 Nope. Anyone may enter the center turn lane to make a left turn so him entering the lane early has no contribution to the accident. For example if you hit a car illegally parked, he might get a parking ticket but it's still your fault 100% for the collision.
@@angelkilier As a center turn lane someone might have wanted to turn left going the opposite way. If they thought his signal was for an earlier turn they may have entered the turn lane and he'd have a head on collision. He could also impede someone's ability to turn the opposite way by moving into that lane early and could impede traffic completely. That was, in my opinion way too early to get in that lane.
As a truck driver, idiots like that are one of my biggest pet peeves. FFS it's not hard to maintain speed and if it is that hard for you use your cruise control.
@@ddylla85 There is a commercial area, then a school zone, then a light controlled crosswalk (which is where the silver car passed the cammer). I live there, it's not uncommon for people to keep going 40 in a 50 all the way to that small plaza.
1:49 I thought the first pass was bad enough, but when they BOTH start raging together all I can think of to say is *don't respond with rage like these two.*
0:25 Car in front of you is moving over. Why would you gun it and risk sandwiching yourself into the guard rail? Lots of time to slow down, but no, screw it, show them who's in the wrong... (Hint: Ultimately, you are. Your speeding up and aggression would have been what initiated the contact)
7:27 To be fair, NEITHER driver appears to have a stop sign; the other car doesn't even have a crosswalk or any lines of demarcation, rather than simply "failing to yield" as the caption suggests.
@@Nick-mg5zj It’s the Honda’s fault no doubt, but as part of defensive driving, we should never speed down a lane of stopped cars or enter turn lanes early for this very reason.
@@DJJumpdancer Its very clear he’s going fast and was turning at the other light. It’s illegal in all states I know to jump into that lane for that reason.
@@DJJumpdancer stoped? What are you talking about? He got into the lane to speed up to the light and use a turn lane to bypass everyone well before he was legally allowed. End of story.
4:40 Your brakes and tires wouldn't have mattered if the Dodge had just pulled all the way out. Recognizing his mistake and stopping immediately is what really saved you.
0:39 - Cammer also seems aggressive! You know what would have prevented this and many, many similar situations from happening? With foreshadowing, you can plan to either speed up or slow down 0:25 - Right about here is when the cammer should have realized the high chance the Subaru would want to in the far left lane as quickly as possible.
@@Gibbs-rq4yg Right of way is right of way. Had a crash occurred the Subaru driver would have been in trouble. Someone turned left in front of me. I had the right of way so no need to stop. I T Boned them and was found not at fault. They learned their lesson and I got more from insurance than my car was worth.
@@durrrrl3435 Every state has laws about how far you are allowed to travel in the suicide lane to make your turn. The driver was going way farther than was legal, he should have waited until he got within the legal limit for his state before getting into that lane!
@@pxn748 yeah, I’m sure you’re going to wait behind all those cars going straight when there’s nobody in the left turn lane, right? The only thing he did wrong was not slowing down.
0:26 you gotta LOVE that ever so audible and evident engine roar of the cammer speeding up, definitely the right decision in this situation /s Sidebar: can someone explain to me how they "illegally merged" into the toll lane? Is there a designated area for getting over or something?
Yes - about 1/2 mile beyond where this took place. Looks like they just repaved this stretch and the broken double-white lines are temporary until they paint them permanently. Double-white = do not cross.
#8 driver was wrong. You can't ride suicide all the way straight when there are 2 arrows in the lane. What if there was a car waiting to turn left. Driver would of ran into them.
You’re “assuming” they were going to keep driving, when in reality you don’t know nor can you prove shit. The FACT of the matter is that the truck failed to yield, hence why they were cited.
@@TruthHurtsFAFO you must ain't watch the same video. He entered the suicide lane way before the lane turned into the left turning lane. If you watched the same video look at the arrows. Suicide lane is not a bypass lane cause you don't want to wait til the lane opens up to you. I would dispute the claim just by the other party dashcam. I didnt ASSUME it's clearly in the video.
@@kmat31 😂 y’all will grasp at anything to blame these big bad cammers won’t ya. People like you get destroyed in court because of your butthurt feelings and I love it. You’ll learn one day
@@tiaratauaese6197 If you find yourself in the same situation some day I’ll just say GOOD LUCK! You’re gonna get wrecked in court, but hey your personal butthurt feelings on the matter will definitely help your case 😂
My bumper looked a little worse than that after I got ass ended. Cost the other driver’s insurance $3700. They had to replace the whole bumper, rear quarter panel, wheel well, back hatch opener mechanism, weather stripping, hatch panel and the thing that says JEEP on my tailgate PLUS another $2k in rental car fees cause I told the body shop to take their time. Dude’s BMW was totaled with $4900 in damages but was worth $4100.
I have a Jeep Cherokee. I got hit at a red light. Driver hit me on the back driver side of my car with the passenger side front headlight area of her car. Her headlight caved in, her hood jammed and when she hit me, she slid under my car as she was in a little sports car. Her car jacked up my frame, bumper and alignment. Her insurance (Geico) paid out $4800ish for mine. So yeah. It’s possible.
You have to also realize there may be sensors, wiring harness, the actual metal bumper all behind the bumper cover so it can be a lot worse than that. Plus the cost of painting, realigning, and installing a new bumper costs a lot too
@3:34 genuine question, but are you allowed to ride the turn lane when it’s shared by both sides? Dash camer rode it for a good amount and I feel like that’s always a bad idea especially when it’s for both sides of the road
#2: although the lane changer was wrong, cammer made it worse by not slowing down when she entered the lane. Likely insurance would have found you 50% at fault for purposely not avoiding an avoidable accident. Let go of the pride.
What is genuinely scary is how many people make left turns based on assumption. The person going straight has the right of way so if you're turning left check before going. Who cares what the car ahead of you did.
3:18 your son should learn what this lane is for. That 17 year old girl had no reason to look for a car using this lane to pass everyone to make his left turn at the light. It's not a traveling lane. Anyone in this lane should be going very slow or stopped to make their left turn.
Yes the cammer was wrong for using that lane the way he did, but the girl ABSOLUTELY has to check for traffic there. Vehicles are allowed to travel for short distances (several hundred feet) to reach their left turn.
@@spamlessaccount "she had no reason to look for a car using this lane to pass everyone". It's not a passing lane, it's not a turning lane yet. A car legally in that lane (to turn in the business in front of her for example), would have been driving much slower than he was. They both could have stopped in time if was driving a speed to make his left turn. He was probably doing close to 30 mph.
actually i have the right of way since the other car was coming from a no exit apart parking lot and i’m in the main lane but other than that is both fault
1:50 maybe he felt that the way you aggressively accelerated after he passed you meant that you were trying to catch back up to him to rage, so he brought it to your front door
@ 0:34, cammer could’ve easily braked for this. They eventually did, but it was to brake check the other driver. You’re no better than the other driver here
Cammer was in the wrong and just plain rude. Why would you take a chance on causing an accident, wrecking 2 cars and potential injuries just to say you were right?
Everytime I would watch these videos, and someone spun out in either rain or snow, I always thought to myself, “it can’t be that hard to correct it.” That was until I spun out and found it hard to correct it. Never underestimate rain.
6:50 Do you think removing all support will solve homelessness or are you cool with homeless people dying if it means you don’t have to look at them? Serious question
I'm going to have to agree with those pointing out that he gunned it when he saw the white car coming up. He went from 80-91 JUST to stop the white car from getting in front of him. He is the cause of this wreck. I'm surprised he didn't try harder to do a pit maneuver, since he seemed so offended that someone didn't want to wait on his lane camping ass.
@@kgb4187 If you can’t pass someone without hitting them, maybe it should not have been attempted. It’s pretty simple. Who cares that the other driver speed up a few MPH. They did not change lanes.
@@kevinbossick8374 Both cars look to be white . Which one are you supporting? Cammer that accelerated recklessly or the other driver who tried threading the ever shrinking hole recklessly?
7:31 Just going off the video I almost think the other car has the right of way and the cammer is the one that didn't yield. It looks like the other car is on the main way headed for the exit.
Same. I rewatched the clip several times, and I don't see signs for either driver. The white car seems to be on a main through road so should have right-of-way.
I agree with you 100% the camera guy is crossing a main road in a grocery parking lot but he thinks he's in the right and cuts of the little white car. It clear that the road that he is on is crossing that main parking lot.
7:32 No, you were driving through the parking lot and did not yield to the car on the right, and almost hit them. Lucky for you, they stopped instead of being a DBag and just honking their horn.
These compilations never fail to show the consequences of reckless driving. It's alarming to see the risky behaviors on display. Let's all drive responsibly and prioritize safety on the roads
@@Captainllama No, just one. Jumping the sidewalk, heading the wrong way, cutting across two lanes, obstructing both lanes of traffic, and finally driving into the back of the other truck.
@@eauhomme Oops wrong clip, my bad. I was unaccountably looking at the clip starting 1:46 where the cammer chased the guy who passed him in the intersection and they exchanged brake checks. You're quite right, the clip at 2:46 is indeed just the single moron committing mutiple violations.
You’re “assuming” they were going to keep driving, when in reality you don’t know nor can you prove shit. The FACT of the matter is that the truck failed to yield, hence why they were cited.
@Falcon2 nope logic works if he wasn't jumping traffic using the lane the accident wouldn't happen. Not sure what dumb logic you are using. Also continuously parading the exact same thing on every post Doesn't make your crap logic anymore believable
Cammer has the legal right of way and needs to maintain momentum if they're in the leftmost lane. Also, it is the job of the driver changing lanes to yield. If a crash occurs it would be on the Subaru driver.
@@IKhanNot There's I gOt MaI rIgHtS! And then the rest of us, "How to avoid a headache in a collision." Most of us think that avoiding accidents is really a good an noble goal (like looking ahead, anticipating, planning, etc...). Then there's yourself and the cammer "I had every right". THAT one goes 2 ways many times. That the cammer SPED UP isn't defensible should they had an accident. It means they saw the other car, and did nothing to slow or avoid the stupidity taking place in front and side and could have just slowed a hair instead if interjecting themselves into a MORE dangerous situation. In an accident with proof (i.e., camera) they'd take some of the blame in most states..
@@IKhanNot while they had the legal right of way, they was no need to maintain momentum. Simply doing as I suggested would have mitigated risk greater than going in the emergency lane. By your logic they shouldn't have even moved at all. Just let themselves be hit. As for me, I will let the idiot beefing into me win than have some dumb pride issue get me into an accident that could have been avoided.
@@MasonC2K It's got nothing to do with pride or ego but rather fairness and following the law. Sure, I don't control anyone else but myself but I won't give up my right of way because someone wants to be either clueless or a bully. Besides, it's my old vehicle versus their newer bank owned vehicle so they'll really feel the squeeze in the end.
You’re “assuming” they were going to keep driving, when in reality you don’t know nor can you prove shit. The FACT of the matter is that the truck failed to yield, hence why they were cited.
@@TruthHurtsFAFO Well we are assuming that the information we are give is correct and not the cammer trying to make themselves completely innocent which happens often in these videos.
not to menton it wasnt just a left turn lane for his side there was arrows for both sides of traffic there... in bird culture thats known as a dick move
#6 If you are driving slower, then he passes you, then you speed up to his pace, it can look like you are challenging him. Why else would you speed up? #8 Remind your son that driving fast next to a line of stopped or slowed cars like that is a bad idea. Someone cutting across or one of those cars cutting to the left is to be expected.
I wouldn't necessarily say the big rig was being an idiot. The particular spot you were in is one of the major blind spots in some models of rig. Since we don't see the rig itself but just the back corner of the trailer. Some makes have an air filter housing right there just below the mirror, or have mirrors lower than others. For all we know the rig didn't even know you were there until it hit you.
#5. Black Camaro----my neighbor, No really----I recognized the intersection, as it's the same way I go home from work every single day. the car---and his car parked in his yard....has the left door damaged with a HOLE it in from the street marker in the median, and scuff marks ALL over it. Second wrecked car in that family in 3 months. BOTH new.
5:59 you have back and neck issues from unintentionally pit-maneuvering someone? Is this serious or just for consistency with the police and medical reports? 6:24 probably doesn't even come close to $1500 in repairs. That's not a lot of damage.
It doesn’t look bad but I’d love to see a response from the cammer once they get an estimate. I didn’t figure mine would be over $1900 but it was $4800ish
0:34 "Lady aggressively cuts..." Dude you were the only aggressive one here. Yes she screwed up but you sped up to worsen the situation, then brake-checked her. DB.
@ Dave Hicibothem: the lady drove agressively, that's obvious, she's 100% to blame. The cammer kept his lane and is allowed to speed up if he wants to. He does not have to yield to the Subaru. If you watch the speed of the cammer at the bottom, you will see he did not brake check, he just let go of his gas a little, which is fine.
@@mve6182 Was the lady to blame? Of course. But you are legally obligated to avoid an accident if possible. That was quite possible the most easily avoidable situation I've seen on this channel.
@@spamlessaccount If an accident would have happened, it would not be because of the cammer not avoiding it, but because of the lady in the Subaru not yielding. Blaming the cammer is like blaming a home-owner fur a burglary for not locking up his house properly.
3:18 cammer is in the wrong.. using that lane that is for turning into those businesses.. cammer obviously wanted to turn left at the light which was far up the road. Illegal use of that lane.
Regardless of if he got into the lane before he should, she needed to ensure the turn lane was clear. He was already in the lane therefore he had right of way. I had a similar situation occur with a lady when I was 17 where she tried to say I was going to fast in the left lane of traffic when she tried to merge from the center turn lane.
More like 80-90%. I wouldn't see that car coming if I turned there, especially with the traffic jam blocking my view, and I for sure wouldn't expect it coming that fast
@@Quantaur Really? If someone blows multiple intersections going far too fast? I mean, I'm not doubting you, I don't know Ontario laws, but still. That's crazy
“No injuries except neck and back”. Which are injuries. Maybe say, “*my* only injuries were neck or back” or maybe “my neck and back hurt after this incident” because the driver of the other vehicle probably had some minor injuries after heading into the tree line.
1:20 hmmm, let's see, potentially 500+ whp muscle car driven by an inexperienced driver at predawn of the day. Those might have been contributing factors to him losing control.
Do cammers ever read these comments and respond when they get called out for being in the wrong? I really want to know if some of them ever acknowledge they messed up.
5:40 that shit is why I avoid the interestates and just generally avoid driving entirely when it snows here in Nashville. People will do that and I ain't in any hurry to be in the impact zone when they eat shit.
#8 I would hope that the DMV or courts would look at this 17 yr old and say "Well, you've had 3 simi-,major accidents in 30 days. I think you need to take driver's classes. License will be demonstrated to a permit until you complete courses. Then fully reinstated after a year of no accidents." That would be the logical thing to do. But, mom and dad probably just bought her a new one.
There was an episode of Cops where this kid in a Mitsubishi Eclipse ass ends another vehicle cause he’s watching the cops who have a car pulled over. When the kid’s mom gets there she lays into him cause she says he totaled FOUR cars in 6 years but he says it was only 3 cause In the second wreck the car wasn’t totaled. Cop snarks back that’s still four wrecked cars PLUS the one he just destroyed in 6 years.
.29 , What a tool. If they made contact, and the cammer showed the video to police and/or his insurance, he would have 100% been found at fault due to his aggressive driving
5:53 Old video, it's made the rounds before... cammer caused this accident... Audi would have made a clean pass, but cammer decided to try to block them, and floored it from 80 up to 91mph... completely intentional and avoidable on cammer's part...
You can't 'cause' an accident by accelerating to pass a slower vehicle in a different lane. Car changing lanes MUST ensure the way is clear before moving over.
I agree, the cammer is at fault for blocking the pass. other car calculated his speed and was safe to pass the inconsiderate asshat hanging out in the left lane. He gets mad someone has the audacity to pass him and then he accelerated. just get out of the left lane and let faster traffic pass.
@@Dajr544_ you are the only one seeing it. This is a shorter edited version of an old video. He was hanging just behind the blue car for a while and refused to move right. Sped up when car behind tried to pass on his right
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 122 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pUQqWkyqBdM/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 122 [USA & Canada Only]](/img/tr.png)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 154 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/VMKnJINmxb4/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 150 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NT_Fiqw5Ctw/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 164 [USA & Canada Only]](/img/1.gif)
*👉Checkout Previous Compilation:* ruclips.net/video/PkasfB1ItkE/видео.html
*👉Submit your Dashcam video for the feature:* forms.gle/dMhP9qznKL11NLii6
*👉Or sent to Email:* megadrivingschoolyt@gmail.com
*👉Recommended best value dashcam:* bit.ly/2GAF2GZ
It’s ok to use your brake to avoid an accident
but that's an affront to my overblown ego! /s
But then I would feel like a wimp and not feel superior
Sad thing is if we trained an AI to drive, it would think laying on the horn and accelerating is the best way to avoid accidents
Sometimes you just freak out and don't do what you need to.
@НАТО в шоке, США обосрались principle* (sorry to be "THAT" person)
Does it seem that more and more dash cam owners are automatically expecting our sympathies when they are the ones causing problems?
Not really. It has always been that way
It is getting worse. I think they just want attention.
Sometimes a dashcam is just a Karen-cam
Yes, it is getting worse every week.
3:18 Maybe it's just me, buy you entered that turn lane way too early.
yup he should be at fault
@@zaiyou9952 Nope. Anyone may enter the center turn lane to make a left turn so him entering the lane early has no contribution to the accident.
For example if you hit a car illegally parked, he might get a parking ticket but it's still your fault 100% for the collision.
Accident would never have happened if the cammer waited to enter the turn lane when legal.
@@angelkilier As a center turn lane someone might have wanted to turn left going the opposite way. If they thought his signal was for an earlier turn they may have entered the turn lane and he'd have a head on collision. He could also impede someone's ability to turn the opposite way by moving into that lane early and could impede traffic completely. That was, in my opinion way too early to get in that lane.
@@angelkilier No, you are not allowed to travel in that lane.
2:36 cammer clearly got his pride hurt with that first pass, regardless on how illegal it was.
As a truck driver, idiots like that are one of my biggest pet peeves. FFS it's not hard to maintain speed and if it is that hard for you use your cruise control.
Love how cammer stated they didn't realize how slow they were going. Get off your dang phone! You're in a residential area ffs
@@ddylla85 There is a commercial area, then a school zone, then a light controlled crosswalk (which is where the silver car passed the cammer). I live there, it's not uncommon for people to keep going 40 in a 50 all the way to that small plaza.
3:20 driving over 3 sets of arrows, in many places that would be considered travelling in a turn lane. you got luck you were not charged as well
I was thinking the same. Seems it should’ve been shared fault at best.
AFAIK that's EVERY place.
Most states allow you to travel 200-300 feet in a middle shared turn lane.
@@bizkillall Typically 200 - but never as a shortcut to a dedicated left turn lane.
@@bizkillall BTW he had already traveled 320 feet in it when the wreck occurred.
1:49 I thought the first pass was bad enough, but when they BOTH start raging together all I can think of to say is *don't respond with rage like these two.*
Acting like children.
@BuckeyeBob OK, but this time I know you're not serious so I'm inclined not to treat you with a serious response; watch again, & let me know.
The cammers feelings got hurt
@@Greydawg You gettin' in his head now. 🥩
Let him pass, why speed up and chase him? ego I guess.
0:25 Car in front of you is moving over. Why would you gun it and risk sandwiching yourself into the guard rail? Lots of time to slow down, but no, screw it, show them who's in the wrong... (Hint: Ultimately, you are. Your speeding up and aggression would have been what initiated the contact)
Don't forget the brake checking
@@apocalypsebandit7023 Nothing like breaking the law to prove how right you are!
Not true.
7:27 To be fair, NEITHER driver appears to have a stop sign; the other car doesn't even have a crosswalk or any lines of demarcation, rather than simply "failing to yield" as the caption suggests.
DashCamer has to yield to the main lane aka other vehicle imo
@@Makaveli3k. Agreed, crossing lane from the cammer seems to be the main/major lane, which cammer should have yielded to.
Personally, I would have slowed to make sure the lane was clear either way, but that's just me
@@Makaveli3k. I used to work as an insurance adjuster and that’s how insurance companies typically see it too in a parking lot
The vehicle to the right always has the right of way at an uncontrolled intersection. The cammer is in the wrong.
"Driving to work at 5:00am, no idea how they lost control"
Easy: More horsepower than brain cells!
You have to give them credit though, he did a great job of controlling the throttle after he initially ran out of traction.
3:17 Speeding past a line of stopped cars, and entering a turn lane before it begins are big no nos
I’m also confused about this, how is it the other persons fault?
@@Nick-mg5zj It’s the Honda’s fault no doubt, but as part of defensive driving, we should never speed down a lane of stopped cars or enter turn lanes early for this very reason.
Not the Honda's fault at all. Cammer illegally used the turn lane to get to the intersection left turn lane.
Classic example of play stupid games win stupid prizes....
@@al1g8r94 No it's not. You can't use the turn lane as another lane of traffic.
Clip #7 2:51 I was ready for about 5 different accidents, but not him ramming the truck that was stationary for 2 minutes right in-front of him.
0:27 Cammer decides that aggressive driving is the best course of action and then doesn't acknowledge even partial responsibility. Alrighty then...
Unfortunately this is par for the course for a lot of these cammers.
i came to the comments to say this. you can hear her accelerate...
and i think she brake checked them too
3:18 in every state I know you aren’t allowed to get into the turn lane that early PRECISELY BECAUSE OF WHAT HAPPENED. You are just as culpable.
what if he wanted to turn there ? and it happened because the Silverado didnt look
@@DJJumpdancer Its very clear he’s going fast and was turning at the other light. It’s illegal in all states I know to jump into that lane for that reason.
@@StevenPenny he was stoped before impact.
@@DJJumpdancer stoped? What are you talking about? He got into the lane to speed up to the light and use a turn lane to bypass everyone well before he was legally allowed. End of story.
@@StevenPenny i think you have the wrong time stamp in your comment ^^ I am talking about the clip in your timestamp at 3:15
4:40 Your brakes and tires wouldn't have mattered if the Dodge had just pulled all the way out. Recognizing his mistake and stopping immediately is what really saved you.
0:39 - Cammer also seems aggressive!
You know what would have prevented this and many, many similar situations from happening?
With foreshadowing, you can plan to either speed up or slow down
0:25 - Right about here is when the cammer should have realized the high chance the Subaru would want to in the far left lane as quickly as possible.
All she had to o was let go of that gas pedal for 2 seconds,but NO I HAVE THE RIGHT OF WAY SO F THAT CAR
Honestly though, and idk why she’s surprised they flipped her off after she brake checked them
I agree. Do cammers realize they are playing with peoples' lives, including their own?
Being right is more important than being safe.
@@Gibbs-rq4yg Right of way is right of way. Had a crash occurred the Subaru driver would have been in trouble. Someone turned left in front of me. I had the right of way so no need to stop. I T Boned them and was found not at fault. They learned their lesson and I got more from insurance than my car was worth.
1:46 "I am stupid".
"But I am stupider"
"No I am stupider"
"Oh hell no, I am stupider"
#9, that's on you. You were using the turn lane as a travel lane!
This happens here allll the time
Drivers just dont care that they drive on the wromg side of the roada
It’s #8, and no he wasn’t, he was turning left at the light. He should have been going a lot slower past stopped traffic, though!
@@durrrrl3435 Every state has laws about how far you are allowed to travel in the suicide lane to make your turn. The driver was going way farther than was legal, he should have waited until he got within the legal limit for his state before getting into that lane!
@@pxn748 yeah, I’m sure you’re going to wait behind all those cars going straight when there’s nobody in the left turn lane, right? The only thing he did wrong was not slowing down.
@ 3:39, the cammer should be partially at fault here. You entered that lane way too early to turn left
Nope that's why the lane is there. Why would you sit in traffic when you have a lane?
0:26 you gotta LOVE that ever so audible and evident engine roar of the cammer speeding up, definitely the right decision in this situation /s
Sidebar: can someone explain to me how they "illegally merged" into the toll lane? Is there a designated area for getting over or something?
Yes - about 1/2 mile beyond where this took place. Looks like they just repaved this stretch and the broken double-white lines are temporary until they paint them permanently. Double-white = do not cross.
#8 driver was wrong. You can't ride suicide all the way straight when there are 2 arrows in the lane. What if there was a car waiting to turn left. Driver would of ran into them.
You’re “assuming” they were going to keep driving, when in reality you don’t know nor can you prove shit. The FACT of the matter is that the truck failed to yield, hence why they were cited.
@@TruthHurtsFAFO going to fast to turn anytime soon
@@TruthHurtsFAFO you must ain't watch the same video. He entered the suicide lane way before the lane turned into the left turning lane. If you watched the same video look at the arrows. Suicide lane is not a bypass lane cause you don't want to wait til the lane opens up to you. I would dispute the claim just by the other party dashcam. I didnt ASSUME it's clearly in the video.
@@kmat31 😂 y’all will grasp at anything to blame these big bad cammers won’t ya. People like you get destroyed in court because of your butthurt feelings and I love it. You’ll learn one day
@@tiaratauaese6197 If you find yourself in the same situation some day I’ll just say GOOD LUCK! You’re gonna get wrecked in court, but hey your personal butthurt feelings on the matter will definitely help your case 😂
6:20 the fact that someone WILL charge $4000 just to replace and repaint a bumper is insane.
My bumper looked a little worse than that after I got ass ended. Cost the other driver’s insurance $3700. They had to replace the whole bumper, rear quarter panel, wheel well, back hatch opener mechanism, weather stripping, hatch panel and the thing that says JEEP on my tailgate PLUS another $2k in rental car fees cause I told the body shop to take their time. Dude’s BMW was totaled with $4900 in damages but was worth $4100.
I have a Jeep Cherokee. I got hit at a red light. Driver hit me on the back driver side of my car with the passenger side front headlight area of her car. Her headlight caved in, her hood jammed and when she hit me, she slid under my car as she was in a little sports car. Her car jacked up my frame, bumper and alignment. Her insurance (Geico) paid out $4800ish for mine. So yeah. It’s possible.
You have to also realize there may be sensors, wiring harness, the actual metal bumper all behind the bumper cover so it can be a lot worse than that. Plus the cost of painting, realigning, and installing a new bumper costs a lot too
@3:34 genuine question, but are you allowed to ride the turn lane when it’s shared by both sides? Dash camer rode it for a good amount and I feel like that’s always a bad idea especially when it’s for both sides of the road
Generally not. I've seen people pulled over for that very reason.
#2: although the lane changer was wrong, cammer made it worse by not slowing down when she entered the lane. Likely insurance would have found you 50% at fault for purposely not avoiding an avoidable accident. Let go of the pride.
Yeah she escalated it way way more than it needed to be.
Plus brake checking them. She needs to stop driving until she gets some therapy
This! Just because you technically have the right of way.. doesn’t mean act stupid.
@@kgb4187 no
She also brake-checked her immediately lol
3:34 your kid shouldn't be driving down the turn lane like that
Do something about it
Dawg wtf 0:30 cammer is the aggressor!
Typical Washington driver of " it's MY lane"
What is genuinely scary is how many people make left turns based on assumption. The person going straight has the right of way so if you're turning left check before going. Who cares what the car ahead of you did.
3:18 your son should learn what this lane is for. That 17 year old girl had no reason to look for a car using this lane to pass everyone to make his left turn at the light. It's not a traveling lane. Anyone in this lane should be going very slow or stopped to make their left turn.
Yes the cammer was wrong for using that lane the way he did, but the girl ABSOLUTELY has to check for traffic there. Vehicles are allowed to travel for short distances (several hundred feet) to reach their left turn.
@@spamlessaccount "she had no reason to look for a car using this lane to pass everyone". It's not a passing lane, it's not a turning lane yet. A car legally in that lane (to turn in the business in front of her for example), would have been driving much slower than he was. They both could have stopped in time if was driving a speed to make his left turn. He was probably doing close to 30 mph.
sure hope insurance won't blame anyone but the driver who should not be in this lane in the first place
@@steveroyer1628 So the girl who pulled into traffic? According to the law, he had the right of way and she didn't yield properly to traffic.
@@Quantaur how does he have the right of way if he is in this lane illegally?
3:19 yeah that's definitely not what the middle turn lane is for
7:30 Why should the other car yield to you? No stop sign. Other car got to the intersection first and was on the right.
Thank you.
Not to mention , going a little fast for a parking lot. Usual limit is 15 unless posted.
@Falcon2 Cammer is wrong . When in doubt ,Yeild to right ,plus other car has right of way as it's ingress/egress lane
actually i have the right of way since the other car was coming from a no exit apart parking lot and i’m in the main lane but other than that is both fault
"she flipped me off even though she was in the wrong" - nah, she probably flipped you off because you brake checked her
Not to mention heavily accelerating to prevent her from "getting" your lane. Sometimes it's better to brake and let it go... you'll live longer.
This lady probably watches dash cam videos every day and does this shit to get cred online for being a good or attentive driver i guess
1:50 maybe he felt that the way you aggressively accelerated after he passed you meant that you were trying to catch back up to him to rage, so he brought it to your front door
@ 0:34, cammer could’ve easily braked for this. They eventually did, but it was to brake check the other driver. You’re no better than the other driver here
Cammer was in the wrong and just plain rude. Why would you take a chance on causing an accident, wrecking 2 cars and potential injuries just to say you were right?
Everytime I would watch these videos, and someone spun out in either rain or snow, I always thought to myself, “it can’t be that hard to correct it.” That was until I spun out and found it hard to correct it. Never underestimate rain.
Some of these cammers are worse than the infraction
6:50 Do you think removing all support will solve homelessness or are you cool with homeless people dying if it means you don’t have to look at them? Serious question
5:43 that's a pretty crazy one, especially since cammer was already doing 80+mph
agree, but he should get out of the left lane and let the faster traffic pass. Cammer's fault.
@BuckeyeBob only after he gunned it to block the passing car. Try again. 🤡
In video, you can see Cammer went from 80 to 88 mph to shut the door on her. 2 idiots.
I'm going to have to agree with those pointing out that he gunned it when he saw the white car coming up. He went from 80-91 JUST to stop the white car from getting in front of him. He is the cause of this wreck. I'm surprised he didn't try harder to do a pit maneuver, since he seemed so offended that someone didn't want to wait on his lane camping ass.
@BuckeyeBob your opinion. You are wrong but still have a right to your own opinions.
5:45 Driver sped up from 80mph to 91mph to not get passed. Seems like both parties were at fault.
Back and Neck injuries??? From the front right fender being bumped? INSURANCE FRAUD!!! For the accident too. Cammer caused it.
The white car was at fault all the way. Completely reckless.
@@kevinbossick8374 Cammer made sure they crashed, that's even more reckless
@@kgb4187 If you can’t pass someone without hitting them, maybe it should not have been attempted. It’s pretty simple. Who cares that the other driver speed up a few MPH. They did not change lanes.
@@kevinbossick8374 Both cars look to be white . Which one are you supporting? Cammer that accelerated recklessly or the other driver who tried threading the ever shrinking hole recklessly?
1:14 to be honest that was a damn good save though.
was looking for this, i was pretty impressed myself
7:09 i thought the video was about the 2 vehicles driving down the bus only lane. Not even mentioned...
That's what I was thinking!
3:18 Totally on you lane is for turning, not for passing like you were, hence yellow and broken yellow lines
7:31 Just going off the video I almost think the other car has the right of way and the cammer is the one that didn't yield. It looks like the other car is on the main way headed for the exit.
I was thinking the same thing
Same. I rewatched the clip several times, and I don't see signs for either driver. The white car seems to be on a main through road so should have right-of-way.
I agree with you 100% the camera guy is crossing a main road in a grocery parking lot but he thinks he's in the right and cuts of the little white car. It clear that the road that he is on is crossing that main parking lot.
7:32 No, you were driving through the parking lot and did not yield to the car on the right, and almost hit them. Lucky for you, they stopped instead of being a DBag and just honking their horn.
@thebeardedmaverick Correct. When this happens, the right hand rule applies; the car on the right should proceed first
0:22 'Lady aggressively cuts across lanes...'
Camer aggressively shows lady who's the boss...
@BuckeyeBob 😂 Sorry, you must have been camer.
@BuckeyeBob Nothing spelled wrong and what does screen name have anything to do with anything?
@BuckeyeBob 😂 whatever kiddo
These compilations never fail to show the consequences of reckless driving. It's alarming to see the risky behaviors on display. Let's all drive responsibly and prioritize safety on the roads
I don’t understand how people get their license.
they made the test easier so no wonder why
Or keep it!
I bought a box of Cracker Jacks.
They don't. Or it's just given out now...
2:46 How many things can one person do wrong in one clip?
*Two* persons.
@@Captainllama No, just one. Jumping the sidewalk, heading the wrong way, cutting across two lanes, obstructing both lanes of traffic, and finally driving into the back of the other truck.
@@eauhomme Oops wrong clip, my bad. I was unaccountably looking at the clip starting 1:46 where the cammer chased the guy who passed him in the intersection and they exchanged brake checks. You're quite right, the clip at 2:46 is indeed just the single moron committing mutiple violations.
3:19 I feel like he jumped that turn lane a little too soon. Shouldn’t they both be at fault?
You’re “assuming” they were going to keep driving, when in reality you don’t know nor can you prove shit. The FACT of the matter is that the truck failed to yield, hence why they were cited.
@@TruthHurtsFAFO I was completely “assuming” because of where the last turn was and where he turned around at the intersection. That’s why I asked.
@Falcon2 if the cammers car wasn't illegally using a turn lane the accident wouldn't have happened....
@Falcon2 nope logic works if he wasn't jumping traffic using the lane the accident wouldn't happen. Not sure what dumb logic you are using. Also continuously parading the exact same thing on every post Doesn't make your crap logic anymore believable
#2 could have avoided the whole thing by either not accelerating or letting off the gas. Better than going into the emergency lane.
Cammer has the legal right of way and needs to maintain momentum if they're in the leftmost lane. Also, it is the job of the driver changing lanes to yield. If a crash occurs it would be on the Subaru driver.
@@IKhanNot There's I gOt MaI rIgHtS! And then the rest of us, "How to avoid a headache in a collision." Most of us think that avoiding accidents is really a good an noble goal (like looking ahead, anticipating, planning, etc...). Then there's yourself and the cammer "I had every right". THAT one goes 2 ways many times. That the cammer SPED UP isn't defensible should they had an accident. It means they saw the other car, and did nothing to slow or avoid the stupidity taking place in front and side and could have just slowed a hair instead if interjecting themselves into a MORE dangerous situation. In an accident with proof (i.e., camera) they'd take some of the blame in most states..
@@kpcasey Find me a law in any North American highway traffic act that states one must give up their right of way. I'll wait.
@@IKhanNot while they had the legal right of way, they was no need to maintain momentum. Simply doing as I suggested would have mitigated risk greater than going in the emergency lane. By your logic they shouldn't have even moved at all. Just let themselves be hit. As for me, I will let the idiot beefing into me win than have some dumb pride issue get me into an accident that could have been avoided.
@@MasonC2K It's got nothing to do with pride or ego but rather fairness and following the law. Sure, I don't control anyone else but myself but I won't give up my right of way because someone wants to be either clueless or a bully. Besides, it's my old vehicle versus their newer bank owned vehicle so they'll really feel the squeeze in the end.
3:34 Odd how you fail to mention your son was traveling in a turn lane and clearly not turning. His speed was a major contributor to that crash.
You’re “assuming” they were going to keep driving, when in reality you don’t know nor can you prove shit. The FACT of the matter is that the truck failed to yield, hence why they were cited.
@@TruthHurtsFAFO Well we are assuming that the information we are give is correct and not the cammer trying to make themselves completely innocent which happens often in these videos.
3:18 , You Sir got what was coming (you fault) , way to early for the left hand turn lane
not to menton it wasnt just a left turn lane for his side there was arrows for both sides of traffic there... in bird culture thats known as a dick move
#6 If you are driving slower, then he passes you, then you speed up to his pace, it can look like you are challenging him. Why else would you speed up? #8 Remind your son that driving fast next to a line of stopped or slowed cars like that is a bad idea. Someone cutting across or one of those cars cutting to the left is to be expected.
Driving long distances in a shared turning lane isn't legal either.
I wouldn't necessarily say the big rig was being an idiot. The particular spot you were in is one of the major blind spots in some models of rig. Since we don't see the rig itself but just the back corner of the trailer. Some makes have an air filter housing right there just below the mirror, or have mirrors lower than others. For all we know the rig didn't even know you were there until it hit you.
5:45 - Getting up to 90 miles an hour is a great idea!
suspiciously short lead up to boot! I'm sure cammer is totally innocent! /s
"my ego is more important than your life"
omg someone is trying to pass me, gotta stomp on the gas cause this is my highway!
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes...
#5. Black Camaro----my neighbor, No really----I recognized the intersection, as it's the same way I go home from work every single day. the car---and his car parked in his yard....has the left door damaged with a HOLE it in from the street marker in the median, and scuff marks ALL over it. Second wrecked car in that family in 3 months. BOTH new.
Dang!
1:47 Proof that not all Canadians are relentlessly polite. That whole thing was completely unnecessary on both drivers’ parts.
Us Canadians are really a**holes, we just put on a friendly act to fool everyone lol
Drive in Toronto or the GTA for one day. Drivers are super aggressive.
Thank you for sharing and the appreciation
Loved the content. Please keep them coming!
As long as there's drugs, cell phones, and dash cameras YOU DO NOT HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT CONTENT... ;o)
5:59 you have back and neck issues from unintentionally pit-maneuvering someone? Is this serious or just for consistency with the police and medical reports?
6:24 probably doesn't even come close to $1500 in repairs. That's not a lot of damage.
Tell that to the insurance company who paid out $3700 to fix my car after I got ass ended and mine was slightly worse than that.
It doesn’t look bad but I’d love to see a response from the cammer once they get an estimate. I didn’t figure mine would be over $1900 but it was $4800ish
0:28 Subaru was a fool but was brake checking necessary?
1:15 I gotta admit, that was nice save 😆 he was testing his driving skills
1:15 " _I meant to do that_ "
Told his wife "I'm a good driver"
Right as he appears, both his right side wheels hit the curb hard.
3:17 She had already written off two cars before this accident? I hope her next 'car' is a bicycle.
Two cars in a month she shouldn’t be allowed to drive anymore
Preferably one with training wheels!
0:34 "Lady aggressively cuts..." Dude you were the only aggressive one here. Yes she screwed up but you sped up to worsen the situation, then brake-checked her. DB.
@ Dave Hicibothem: the lady drove agressively, that's obvious, she's 100% to blame. The cammer kept his lane and is allowed to speed up if he wants to. He does not have to yield to the Subaru. If you watch the speed of the cammer at the bottom, you will see he did not brake check, he just let go of his gas a little, which is fine.
@@mve6182 Was the lady to blame? Of course. But you are legally obligated to avoid an accident if possible. That was quite possible the most easily avoidable situation I've seen on this channel.
@@spamlessaccount If an accident would have happened, it would not be because of the cammer not avoiding it, but because of the lady in the Subaru not yielding. Blaming the cammer is like blaming a home-owner fur a burglary for not locking up his house properly.
Great video!
The situational awareness on the some of these clips is baffling....
7:24 you need to yield to them. You're the one crossing the lane of traffic.
@Falcon2 Once again. Cammer is wrong . When in doubt ,Yeild to right ,plus other car has right of way as it's ingress/egress lane
3:18 cammer is in the wrong.. using that lane that is for turning into those businesses.. cammer obviously wanted to turn left at the light which was far up the road. Illegal use of that lane.
True
Regardless of if he got into the lane before he should, she needed to ensure the turn lane was clear. He was already in the lane therefore he had right of way. I had a similar situation occur with a lady when I was 17 where she tried to say I was going to fast in the left lane of traffic when she tried to merge from the center turn lane.
0:20 you agressively defended that lane too brother
#8 you are in the wrong for speeding through a turn lane BEFORE actually needing to turn left. YOU should have been found at fault.
50/50
6:01. So you DO have injuries...
0:41 - Thought it was Otto rocking out in the school bus for a moment.
3:18 your son should be at least 50% fault. Going way too fast past stopped cars, and in a lane he shouldn’t even be in.
More like 80-90%. I wouldn't see that car coming if I turned there, especially with the traffic jam blocking my view, and I for sure wouldn't expect it coming that fast
You can disagree with the law, but according to what I found on Ontario driving laws, she is still be completely at fault for the accident
@@Quantaur Really? If someone blows multiple intersections going far too fast? I mean, I'm not doubting you, I don't know Ontario laws, but still. That's crazy
4:15 - That was totally unexpected because I, like most, figured one of the vehicles after the black car would pull in front of the cammer.
8:28 at this point, they don't even surprise me anymore, we can see that coming from a mile away
3:33 dont let her drive ever again
its so rare to find drivers who actually take responsibilities for their mistakes
Finally PR in the house!!!! 😃
7:33 he doesn't have a stop sign does he ? I can't see it and if you both dont have one you give way to the right
I like that these cams now have the telemetry to say how fast cammer was going. Tells a little bit more to the story
5:45 guarantee the cammer clipped the footage to remove his own bad behavior
That wouldn't change the bad decision from other driver.
@@flawlesscarlo That doesn't change anything that I said
@@rooh5825 If the cammer did something before the clip how would it change this situation or who is to blame?
@@flawlesscarlo -- If it has to be explained to you, turn in your license. You can't be taught.
“No injuries except neck and back”. Which are injuries. Maybe say, “*my* only injuries were neck or back” or maybe “my neck and back hurt after this incident” because the driver of the other vehicle probably had some minor injuries after heading into the tree line.
1:17 They lost control because they can't handle the power of that Camaro.
5:49 another cammer vigilante causing a wreck… he floored it to block the guy passing him because he’s the left lane speed limit police.
5:44 Yes Speed up to cause an accident at 88mph?
7:30 yeah you're at fault
7:28 Going across the parking lot when suddenly TWO cars fail to yield. FIFY. Are there invisible yield signs that I am not seeing?
I never thought you could use the curb to initiate a sick 360 like that Camaro driver did, excellend job, 10/10, flawless execution 1:21
1:20 hmmm, let's see, potentially 500+ whp muscle car driven by an inexperienced driver at predawn of the day. Those might have been contributing factors to him losing control.
6:24 $4000 for a new rear bumper my ass
Do cammers ever read these comments and respond when they get called out for being in the wrong? I really want to know if some of them ever acknowledge they messed up.
I’ve seen some who have. And they still think they’re 100% innocent.
3:18 Cammer should’ve gotten a citation, too. Just flying down a dual-turn lane with no regard.
1:25 I can tell why they lost control...
Driving while dumba$$.
Stomped the gas and had more power than they could deal with.
5:40 that shit is why I avoid the interestates and just generally avoid driving entirely when it snows here in Nashville. People will do that and I ain't in any hurry to be in the impact zone when they eat shit.
#8
I would hope that the DMV or courts would look at this 17 yr old and say "Well, you've had 3 simi-,major accidents in 30 days. I think you need to take driver's classes. License will be demonstrated to a permit until you complete courses. Then fully reinstated after a year of no accidents." That would be the logical thing to do. But, mom and dad probably just bought her a new one.
There was an episode of Cops where this kid in a Mitsubishi Eclipse ass ends another vehicle cause he’s watching the cops who have a car pulled over. When the kid’s mom gets there she lays into him cause she says he totaled FOUR cars in 6 years but he says it was only 3 cause In the second wreck the car wasn’t totaled. Cop snarks back that’s still four wrecked cars PLUS the one he just destroyed in 6 years.
1:16 I suspect the traction control was turned off or dumbass was trying to audition for the next Fast & Furious movie.
5:43 cammer caused this by speeding up to block the car passing, they sped up from 80 to 91 just so this would happen!
4:00 Woooow, another deer cutting off another driver. I wonder how many of y'all are going to blame the driver AGAIN 😒
0:48 I always get a bit nervous when going straight in these situations
.29 , What a tool. If they made contact, and the cammer showed the video to police and/or his insurance, he would have 100% been found at fault due to his aggressive driving
5:53 Old video, it's made the rounds before... cammer caused this accident... Audi would have made a clean pass, but cammer decided to try to block them, and floored it from 80 up to 91mph... completely intentional and avoidable on cammer's part...
You can't 'cause' an accident by accelerating to pass a slower vehicle in a different lane. Car changing lanes MUST ensure the way is clear before moving over.
Cammer might be inconsiderate if what you say is true but they did not cause the accident. That's not how the law is written.
I agree, the cammer is at fault for blocking the pass. other car calculated his speed and was safe to pass the inconsiderate asshat hanging out in the left lane. He gets mad someone has the audacity to pass him and then he accelerated. just get out of the left lane and let faster traffic pass.
@@Rybay Wasn't he passing the blue car before the crash, or am I the only one seeing that?
@@Dajr544_ you are the only one seeing it. This is a shorter edited version of an old video. He was hanging just behind the blue car for a while and refused to move right. Sped up when car behind tried to pass on his right
I have watched almost every video this channel has ever produced and there is NO better summary than this...5:59!🤣🤣🤣