The ERA really does make that big of a difference wow. When it's intact the damn thing can tank a DM53. I'm genuinely shocked that this still uses the same T-72B composite layout and was never upgraded.
Funnily enough the T-72B has the *wrong* armour in game. In game is the well known (and absolute sh!t) 60-NERA-NERA-60-10-50 layout, which only came in around 1989 (therefore the T-72B 1989 has the correct armour) while irl it was 60-15-15-15-50 or 60-10-10-20-20-50 (10's, 15's and 20's were High Hardness Armour plates with 15 or 10mm of Air gaps in between) which alone, without any kind of ERA, could eat DM33.
@@saucy743 in my comment I was referring to hull armor. I'm assuming that's the turret armor you're referring to? I thought the hull used textolite but yeah the T-72B was also the first Russian tank to use NERA in the turret. Sorry just a bit confused about which you're referring to.
@@RedVRCC nope, i'm reffering to the Hull armour. The Turret armour is insanely different. The T-72B uses a Cast turret with NERA cavities filled with reflector plates.
@@saucy743 shit, wow then that better hull armor should also probably be in the T-90A and M then too? The armor in game already seemed pretty good especially when paired with heavy ERA.
@@RedVRCC Indeed it should. However as i've heard the current 60-NERA-NERA-60-10-50 Armour layout was specifically made for (or around) the Kontakt-5 ERA (on the T-90M it was replaced by Relikt). Albeit, the 60-10-10-20-20-50 would be the sensible go to to be Fitted on T-90As and Ms. Better yet it's preformance could be near doubled if the air gaps between the plates were fitted with Textolite, Ceramic or even more Steel.
it would be necessary to test the composite plate of the Wz123A and the ZTZ99A these 2 tanks have the same value of composite armor on the front plate but strangely the ZTZ 99A resists the Dm 53 when shooting under the headlight
@@neon4ik594 I did other tests and as a result the ZTZ 99A is the best armored tank on the front plate against apfsds without ERA even the Strv 122+ is not as protected on the front plate it resists aspfds of 292, 695 mm pen at 0 meter in the front plate
It's not very accurate from point blank, because the shell strikes at a more favourable angle. Try doing the same from even 200 meters and the results will certainly be more accurate.
ShorThunder will never stop putting blue archive music in his videos (real)
I make sure that when players play the blue archive they remember me 😈😈😈
@@ShorThunder that genuinely happened to me
@@ShorThunderthe only thing I know about that game is the video titled “blue archive player gets search history leaked” and my god…
@@EamonOLeary probably me forgetting to delete it
@@EamonOLeary same bro, every time i hear blue archive i immediately think of the things that man searched
T-90A: “Sup Bro! i Have Eyes! wait where’s Your Eyes?”
T-90M: “they.. took my fkin eyes..”
if you look carefully it still has eyes, just little crab eyes
The ERA really does make that big of a difference wow. When it's intact the damn thing can tank a DM53. I'm genuinely shocked that this still uses the same T-72B composite layout and was never upgraded.
Funnily enough the T-72B has the *wrong* armour in game.
In game is the well known (and absolute sh!t)
60-NERA-NERA-60-10-50 layout, which only came in around 1989 (therefore the T-72B 1989 has the correct armour) while irl it was
60-15-15-15-50 or
60-10-10-20-20-50 (10's, 15's and 20's were High Hardness Armour plates with 15 or 10mm of Air gaps in between) which alone, without any kind of ERA, could eat DM33.
@@saucy743 in my comment I was referring to hull armor. I'm assuming that's the turret armor you're referring to? I thought the hull used textolite but yeah the T-72B was also the first Russian tank to use NERA in the turret.
Sorry just a bit confused about which you're referring to.
@@RedVRCC nope, i'm reffering to the Hull armour. The Turret armour is insanely different.
The T-72B uses a Cast turret with NERA cavities filled with reflector plates.
@@saucy743 shit, wow then that better hull armor should also probably be in the T-90A and M then too? The armor in game already seemed pretty good especially when paired with heavy ERA.
@@RedVRCC Indeed it should. However as i've heard the current 60-NERA-NERA-60-10-50 Armour layout was specifically made for (or around) the Kontakt-5 ERA (on the T-90M it was replaced by Relikt). Albeit, the 60-10-10-20-20-50 would be the sensible go to to be Fitted on T-90As and Ms.
Better yet it's preformance could be near doubled if the air gaps between the plates were fitted with Textolite, Ceramic or even more Steel.
it would be necessary to test the composite plate of the Wz123A and the ZTZ99A these 2 tanks have the same value of composite armor on the front plate but strangely the ZTZ 99A resists the Dm 53 when shooting under the headlight
@@jeremyminfir3440 no ztz99a has another material, wz has materials like t-80
@@neon4ik594
I did other tests and as a result the ZTZ 99A is the best armored tank on the front plate against apfsds without ERA even the Strv 122+ is not as protected on the front plate
it resists aspfds of 292, 695 mm pen at 0 meter in the front plate
@@jeremyminfir3440 do you have test map?
The layout hull wise of the WZ1001 and ZTZ99A are different especially in the driver placement/optics.
i cant believe it you actually did a video of my idea
Thanks for your idea, I'm always interested in checking out your thoughts and suggestions ⭐
Moment when double barrel Abram would be fantastic fix XD
what is this game? looks like a left 4 dead mod with ray tracing
That’s a funny way to spell war thunder
minecraft
War Thunder lmao it’s free
I don't see where you got the L4D from
Fr fr
Can you test a ztz99a without era pls
Bro when i break era or extra armor the penetration animtion shows era
Важно то, какой урон наносится. Анимация в игре сломана
@@HoBoeBpeM9l l;
ok
[BGM]
BlueArchive OST 40. Neo City Dive
You didn’t test a kv2 nuke 😢
Allow me to modify the words of an unknown redditor on the wt subreddit i forgot about: "jUsT a LiTtLe bIt mOrE ErA wIlL fIx iT bRo"
This is why m829a3 hasn’t been added yet
How to make money, for example, so that the cars are standing and that’s it
Gaijin really overpowers it’s Russian tanks, they can die with just one drone irl
Abrams review? Or just coping?
Packet loss go brrr
I feel like the era is too durable, it should really break after one 30mm shot
En la vida real el t90m (según documentos occidentales) tiene un blindaje frontal de 960 mm
It's not very accurate from point blank, because the shell strikes at a more favourable angle. Try doing the same from even 200 meters and the results will certainly be more accurate.
может не надо было динамическую защиту убирать?
OST 164 or OST 96 for next vid pls🙏
Russian mostly research ERA technology than composite armour
china armour vs usa armour next!
and people say bias
Pls use OST. 74 for ur next vid
A good choice! But the next video will most likely be with OST 83/84.
I will definitely fulfill your request
Thx. OST 74 is a banger@@ShorThunder
Is that our russian bias?
Да
50 cal can strip them off?
ERA block can be taken off by hand...
495mm: pens
shorthunder: 700 MM NEEEEXT
)))))))))))
pretty sure if you have a t90m
without the ERA l, you get a t72b instead. they have identical base armor on the hull.
T-90M have stronger base armour
@@boreduser-on6ow okay, 72B(89)
Where the 1943 pen ?
The T-90M with ERA did not survive, I think there is no need for 1943 pen 💀💀💀