Yep... Might not even require an amendment. Just a law passed stating the definition of natural born. Tourist babies is just a bad policy when you can be anywhere in the world in under a day.
It's in the Constitution I don't believe in changing the Constitution it's been there for a reason. Now I do believe in sending the parents back. My mom came to America the correct way also had my brother and I after she became legal to be here in America. I have a cousin who has been here 30 an refuse to get himself legal I don't feel sorry for him if he gets sent back cause he can afford to hire a lawyer but refuses to spend those thousands of dollars. I'm a huge trump supporter but I don't believe in changing the Constitution.
first of all the constitution never meant for it to cover Anchor babies. Both Parents should have legal visa's for the baby to be born a citizen. Two illegal immigrants should not be able to cross the border and then get to stay because they gave birth here. that is not Constitutional.
I agree with you, I don’t think the 14th amendment was meant for this purpose. So illegal immigrants can enter our country and have children. Now if these parents decide to to leave the country and return to their native country with this child the USA is funding healthcare, benefits and social security for these kids is on the American taxpayers for this child. Don’t they get that these illegal immigrants check a free pass.I don’t think our forefathers had this in mind when this amendment was introduced
Stop talking about immigrants like they’re subhuman. They came here to chase the American dream. They work for their stuff and they pay taxes. Taking away rights of Americans is insane. F MAGA. Imagine when your family came here and this happened. Than YOU wouldn’t be here. Barron was born before Melania was a citizen. So does he get the boot? I hate the Trump family. But that’s unfair for him. So that means 2A can be changed. It’s a slippery slope. If this happens I can see Trump taking away your guns. So you can’t fight against him.
Birthright citizenship applies in all of north, central and South American countries… that’s not correct. You may do the same in Mexico. It’s not to protect the parents. Parents remain undocumented. Only the unborn child is protected so they do not have to suffer for actions of parents. All the immigrants that built this country in the past, had children that benefited from birthright citizenship (ex: our grandparents). Reading is fundamental.
it can be changed, but not through EO. but the point of this is not to change the Constitution but to tie up the state's courts, manpower, and resources.
The point of the order was to disallow illegal immigrants, specifically, from granting citizenship to their children without being citizens themselves. Not all Americans. If you can't see how this is damaging to our country, and deliberate sabotage by Congress in the 1960s, there's little hope for us. This has nothing to do with the Constitution and everything to do with the Immigration Act of 1965. The Republicans were never truly anti immigration until now because they never challenged this blatantly subversive legislature. In most nations, they do not even grant automatic citizenship to children born to two citizens. It's time to stop being the world's charity fund and free housing project.
No, we don't. This has nothing to do with the Constitution, and it's a pathetic attempt to make Trump look more authoritarian than he is. The problem of "anchor babies" or citizens born to non-citizens stems from the 1965 Immigration Act.
4:34 - 5:08 Those babies shouldn’t have a rights to be a citizen because their parent Shouldn’t Even Be Here To quote this twit… ‘this is fairly obvious.’
Unfortunately, it's in Constitution. When Constitution was adopted this country needed more people and Founding Fathers didn't expect that overpopulation may ever become a problem.
HE MENTIONS THE "DRED SCOTT" CASE AND HOW IMPORTANT IT IS. THIS CASE ONLY CONCERNS BLACK SLAVES, NOT BIRTH RIGHTS OR OTHER GROUPS .WHEN ASK BY A REPORTER WHAT YEAR WAS THE DRED SCOTT CASE, HE DIDN'T EVEN KNOW AS A LAWYER. HE JUST PIGGY-BACKING OFF THIS CASE TO STRENGTHEN HIS CASE.
The 14th Amendment has to be protected as this could be one of the first amendments they will take from us. Next, it could be your First Amendment. Great job, judge.
Here's the full quote from Senator Jacob M. Howard during the Congressional debates on the 14th Amendment, specifically addressing the citizenship clause: "This amendment which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. ***This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.*** It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country." This quote comes from the Congressional Globe, 39th Congress, 1st Session, May 30, 1866, page 2890. Howard's statement indicates that he did not intend for the amendment to grant citizenship to children of foreign diplomats, but his reference to "foreigners, aliens in this context has been interpreted by some to suggest a broader exclusion. However, judicial interpretation, particularly in cases like United States v. Wong Kim Ark, has since clarified that "subject to the jurisdiction" was meant to apply more broadly than Howard's example might suggest, leading to the practice of birthright citizenship for most people born on U.S. soil.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
Your efforts to block this order will be fruitless 😢. All your doing is buying time and using up tax payers money.
@@joseesparza6759 💯
Why dont you stand for the American people who have spoken.
That was an all a dilliusional Trump proposition. America is an all migrant state. Unless you are native to these land. You are a migrant by ancestry!
Why doesn’t the population vote to make those changes?
They did. They chose trump
They did. That is why the ellection is held.
Yep... Might not even require an amendment. Just a law passed stating the definition of natural born. Tourist babies is just a bad policy when you can be anywhere in the world in under a day.
We have constitution remember!
It's in the Constitution I don't believe in changing the Constitution it's been there for a reason. Now I do believe in sending the parents back. My mom came to America the correct way also had my brother and I after she became legal to be here in America. I have a cousin who has been here 30 an refuse to get himself legal I don't feel sorry for him if he gets sent back cause he can afford to hire a lawyer but refuses to spend those thousands of dollars. I'm a huge trump supporter but I don't believe in changing the Constitution.
Cut Washington state funds
If you are illegal in this country having children, your are not a citizen and you are breaking the law period, you have no rights.
❤AMEN!!!!!!
Nope Trump tried to get rid of The Legal Immigrants with Bigotry
first of all the constitution never meant for it to cover Anchor babies. Both Parents should have legal visa's for the baby to be born a citizen. Two illegal immigrants should not be able to cross the border and then get to stay because they gave birth here. that is not Constitutional.
EXACTLY
You learn a lot from reading books. You should try it!🫶🏽
“That’s not constitutional😢” I thought liberals were the snowflakes lol. MAGA tears are my favorite
You people use dangerous language. You’ve brained washed to see others as subhuman. No other country would do this.
I agree with you, I don’t think the 14th amendment was meant for this purpose. So illegal immigrants can enter our country and have children. Now if these parents decide to to leave the country and return to their native country with this child the USA is funding healthcare, benefits and social security for these kids is on the American taxpayers for this child. Don’t they get that these illegal immigrants check a free pass.I don’t think our forefathers had this in mind when this amendment was introduced
Hopefully this will get to the Supreme fast. The 14th Amendment does not apply to invading foreign citizens
Are you Native American?
Stop talking about immigrants like they’re subhuman. They came here to chase the American dream. They work for their stuff and they pay taxes. Taking away rights of Americans is insane.
F MAGA. Imagine when your family came here and this happened. Than YOU wouldn’t be here. Barron was born before Melania was a citizen. So does he get the boot? I hate the Trump family. But that’s unfair for him.
So that means 2A can be changed. It’s a slippery slope. If this happens I can see Trump taking away your guns. So you can’t fight against him.
@@rauperez8751 what an absurd comment. Native Americans have nothing to do with the constitution.
We finally get a president who actually cares about this country and then there's this guy
We know “this guy” voted for Kamala. So we k ow where he stands.
The 14th was fir slaves not illegal babies
I AGEE 1,000,000,000%👍👍👍
Why are they defending birth right citizenship if neither parent is a legal citizen? Americans couldn't do that in any other country
Birthright citizenship applies in all of north, central and South American countries… that’s not correct. You may do the same in Mexico. It’s not to protect the parents. Parents remain undocumented. Only the unborn child is protected so they do not have to suffer for actions of parents. All the immigrants that built this country in the past, had children that benefited from birthright citizenship (ex: our grandparents). Reading is fundamental.
Well, thanks for your opinion judge, but we are moving without you
Of course, the states Washington, Oregon and Illinois would try to block this 🤦🏻♂️
DEI judge
WTF "Translate to English"
That judge needs to be removed Americans want the law.
Keep pushing.
Good job! 👍The law of the land must prevail. The Constitution can not be changed.
it can be changed, but not through EO. but the point of this is not to change the Constitution but to tie up the state's courts, manpower, and resources.
Where were you during Biden's terrible ideas?
If your born on American soil ? Even if here illegally ??
No more anchor babies
Love to see my WA AG fighting for people!
Go ahead, "booo" and cry all you want! If you're all against the Constitution of the United States then LEAVE!
Thank you Washington State!
💙✌️🤜🤛🏼🫶💙
The point of the order was to disallow illegal immigrants, specifically, from granting citizenship to their children without being citizens themselves. Not all Americans. If you can't see how this is damaging to our country, and deliberate sabotage by Congress in the 1960s, there's little hope for us. This has nothing to do with the Constitution and everything to do with the Immigration Act of 1965. The Republicans were never truly anti immigration until now because they never challenged this blatantly subversive legislature. In most nations, they do not even grant automatic citizenship to children born to two citizens. It's time to stop being the world's charity fund and free housing project.
blue alll the way
Why don't you read the 14th A, and then research its origins. It was meant to deal with the citizen question former slaves after the civil war.
@@sam-l5syup all the way to hell. Lol trump's your daddy
Thank you.
Boooooooooooooooooooooooooo
I guess we need to change the US Constitution on this matter.
you cant so cry lol it needs 2/3 of congress,2/3 of senate and all 38 states
No, we don't. This has nothing to do with the Constitution, and it's a pathetic attempt to make Trump look more authoritarian than he is. The problem of "anchor babies" or citizens born to non-citizens stems from the 1965 Immigration Act.
Booooo. you can’t 😂
2:10 - 2:26 yea… that’s Exactly why we wanted it done.
4:34 - 5:08
Those babies shouldn’t have a rights to be a citizen because their parent Shouldn’t Even Be Here
To quote this twit… ‘this is fairly obvious.’
You Mr. WILL do what We the People want. Oregonians said send them back over 70% of the voters have spoken.
now we shall see trump and his maga follows be all upset lol i love there tears
@sam-l5s Not really. It will go to the Supreme Court. Don't be too happy. Maga followers are not upset. Obviously, you are.
Fine kid is us citizen but parents aren't if here unlawfuly. Let kids stay parents go
Kids can’t stay. Who will care for them? Kids staying is the anchor to have their entire family come.
Unfortunately, it's in Constitution. When Constitution was adopted this country needed more people and Founding Fathers didn't expect that overpopulation may ever become a problem.
We love Pres Trump❤❤❤
Take Trump with you with Bigotry and Stereotypical Remarks
Oregonians stand up . SPEAK UP
HE MENTIONS THE "DRED SCOTT" CASE AND HOW IMPORTANT IT IS. THIS CASE ONLY CONCERNS BLACK SLAVES, NOT BIRTH RIGHTS OR OTHER GROUPS .WHEN ASK BY A REPORTER WHAT YEAR WAS THE DRED SCOTT CASE, HE DIDN'T EVEN KNOW AS A LAWYER. HE JUST PIGGY-BACKING OFF THIS CASE TO STRENGTHEN HIS CASE.
The 14th Amendment has to be protected as this could be one of the first amendments they will take from us. Next, it could be your First Amendment. Great job, judge.
Get rid of 14th Amendment.
Thank you for your service sir!! 👏👏👏
None of you MENSA members have actually read the Constitution, and it shows.
Good job. If you changed the constitution what else left for us?
The Constitution has been amended many times
Defend Democracy in a Const Republic
They spawn kids to stay… who’s to say these “parents “ are fugitives.
Its ok...in the end guess who win win win win ? 😊
Schmarmy lil weaseldik
There block Trump order birth right citizen
Expected
Luigi needs a pardon, he has new targets
So if a parent is here illegally and have a baby here in the United States that baby is a citizen?
Yes, Desiree.
Clearly, if you did not know this, then you might need to educate yourself.
Word
YAAAAAAY!👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 Awesome news! This will be held up in the courts his entire 4 years!👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 Thank you Jesus! Next!!
Yay to rapists having babies here and think they can stay. YAYYYY
No about two years. Trump will bypass San Francisco appeal.
Here's the full quote from Senator Jacob M. Howard during the Congressional debates on the 14th Amendment, specifically addressing the citizenship clause:
"This amendment which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. ***This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.*** It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country."
This quote comes from the Congressional Globe, 39th Congress, 1st Session, May 30, 1866, page 2890. Howard's statement indicates that he did not intend for the amendment to grant citizenship to children of foreign diplomats, but his reference to "foreigners, aliens in this context has been interpreted by some to suggest a broader exclusion. However, judicial interpretation, particularly in cases like United States v. Wong Kim Ark, has since clarified that "subject to the jurisdiction" was meant to apply more broadly than Howard's example might suggest, leading to the practice of birthright citizenship for most people born on U.S. soil.