Correct call. No fault. To be a fault, at least one of two things must occur: 1) the player interfere's with an opposing team's player or 2) at least one foot must be completely in the opposite court *and* touch the floor. In this case, the player does not interfere with a player on the other side and the fallen player's foot, even though it does touch the ground, is still above the center line. Also, there is no fault for your teammate to help you avoid a fault.
No it is not. Any part of your body can be past the center line, touching the ground except your feet. If you are about to commit a fault, your teammate is allowed to pull you away from the net/ center line, which was done in this case. Without the teammate, this guy would probably have rolled furter, until his feet were past the line, which was prevented here.
It does not matter if a foot is _completely_ in the opponent's space, provided the foot does not _touch_ the opponent's court (or you interfere the opponent's play). You can slide up to the end line. No fault, provided non of your feet touch the court and you don't interfere the opponent's play.
i agree with you but i think your wording could be more precise. even if he had rolled further, it's not an automatic fault unless/until his feet touch the floor.
As long as there's no interference, all that matters are the feet touching the floor... I mean let's say his entire body cross the line but his feet stay up in the air, as long as he doesn't put his feet on the ground there's no fault even if he's entirely on the other side. This means in this scenario a teammate could pull that player back on his side and there would be no fault at all. And of course the foot on the ground needs to be entirely on the other side for a fault.
11.2.2.1 to touch the opponent’s court with a foot (feet) is permitted, provided that some part of the penetrating foot (feet) remains either in contact with or directly above the centre line and this action does not interfere with the opponent’s play 11.2.2.2 to touch the opponent’s court with any part of the body above the feet is permitted provided that it does not interfere with the opponent’s play
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
Correct call. No fault.
To be a fault, at least one of two things must occur: 1) the player interfere's with an opposing team's player or 2) at least one foot must be completely in the opposite court *and* touch the floor.
In this case, the player does not interfere with a player on the other side and the fallen player's foot, even though it does touch the ground, is still above the center line.
Also, there is no fault for your teammate to help you avoid a fault.
No it is not. Any part of your body can be past the center line, touching the ground except your feet. If you are about to commit a fault, your teammate is allowed to pull you away from the net/ center line, which was done in this case. Without the teammate, this guy would probably have rolled furter, until his feet were past the line, which was prevented here.
It does not matter if a foot is _completely_ in the opponent's space, provided the foot does not _touch_ the opponent's court (or you interfere the opponent's play).
You can slide up to the end line. No fault, provided non of your feet touch the court and you don't interfere the opponent's play.
i agree with you but i think your wording could be more precise. even if he had rolled further, it's not an automatic fault unless/until his feet touch the floor.
What about his hands touching the floor? Isn't there a ruling about the hands or feet?
As long as there's no interference, all that matters are the feet touching the floor... I mean let's say his entire body cross the line but his feet stay up in the air, as long as he doesn't put his feet on the ground there's no fault even if he's entirely on the other side. This means in this scenario a teammate could pull that player back on his side and there would be no fault at all. And of course the foot on the ground needs to be entirely on the other side for a fault.
@@Marcv1285 You're perfectly right 👍😊
@@Marcv1285 Is there violation if the foot cross the center line? Or it must be the feet to cross the center line to call it a violation?
11.2.2.1 to touch the opponent’s court with a foot (feet) is permitted, provided
that some part of the penetrating foot (feet) remains either in contact
with or directly above the centre line and this action does not interfere
with the opponent’s play
11.2.2.2 to touch the opponent’s court with any part of the body above the feet
is permitted provided that it does not interfere with the opponent’s play
N