PNSO Triceratops Doyle Review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 авг 2024
  • PNSO Triceratops Doyle Review. This is the 1/35 scale model. This is a great model by pnso. I have a couple tiny gripes with it but overall it’s a great model.

Комментарии • 14

  • @Mikelangelouss
    @Mikelangelouss 4 года назад +4

    I love the pose of this Triceratops. It's very dynamic. 👌 The best Triceratops figure for now. 👍

  • @simonecappiello3937
    @simonecappiello3937 3 месяца назад

    This Model is very good, Pose, Shape, Colour and Base in particular. A little skinny Neck for the Head.

  • @dynamosaurusimperious6341
    @dynamosaurusimperious6341 3 года назад +1

    Just wanted to say this was a gud review

  • @LoneWolf-kn5hv
    @LoneWolf-kn5hv 5 лет назад

    Nice review. Incredible how cheap the paint job is, compared to the prototype photographs. Possibly done very fast and cheap in some Chinese sweat shop by people who earn all too little money.

    • @DinoScreamReviews
      @DinoScreamReviews  5 лет назад

      The earlier PNSO stuff the paint varied greatly from the prototype images. However there’s a version 2.0 out now of Doyle that more closely matches the prototype.

  • @bostonmeadhorn4897
    @bostonmeadhorn4897 5 лет назад +3

    So when you gunna get a skeletor to ride it? I'd like to see that! And I'm not talking about Nancy Pelosi 😂

    • @DinoScreamReviews
      @DinoScreamReviews  5 лет назад +2

      I maybe have a old skeletor buried somewhere. I have so much stuff scattered between my parents houses lol

  • @VazgShah79
    @VazgShah79 5 лет назад +1

    Can this model stand without base?

    • @DinoScreamReviews
      @DinoScreamReviews  5 лет назад +1

      It’s does. There’s just a peg for the back leg so it stays secure on the base. It’s stands perfectly fine off the base.

  • @cosminbryant1243
    @cosminbryant1243 3 года назад

    Haaa that is funny when you said once a while you have to hide from your wife 😃

  • @eduardofreitas8336
    @eduardofreitas8336 5 лет назад +2

    The problem with the mouth is that it doesn't have cheeks :/ awesome figure otherwise.

    • @BionicleSaurus
      @BionicleSaurus 5 лет назад +1

      Well, it technically does have them, they're just too thin and don't extend all the way to the beak. They look more like the thin cheeks of a Theropod.

  • @miertjestoer9525
    @miertjestoer9525 3 года назад

    This one looks not that robust.

  • @thomasmonroe7947
    @thomasmonroe7947 3 года назад

    So, it’s not a Barbie.
    I prefer as scientifically accurate a representation as possible.
    Having a figure with a fully visible cloaca is doing justice to accuracy just as much as muscle structure or visible bone structure.
    The paint job on your triceratops sucks.
    The sculpt is great.
    I especially love the overall girth of the figure giving it a very healthy animal look.
    The price, though, currently, is pretty much, a true buzz kill.
    I might spring for one if it doesn’t have that crappy honeycomb paint job.