*Claim:* We need to perfect ourselves. Once this is done then Islam will prevail *Reality:* Perfection has never been a condition or prerequisite to perform Jihad against the disbelievers. If anything we know of the companion Nuayman ibn Amr who for a period of time found it difficult to overcome an alcohol addiction. Yet he was still a ghazi in the battles of Badr, Uhud and Khandaq
Also these madakhila consider the Saudi regime their leaders they have an army, so what has the muslim ummah have to do with the saudi regime stepping upto the plate.
To be honest this is something i am confused as well and frustrates me because we cannot be perfect only Allah (SWT) is , so when i hear that we have to be perfect i dont understand but yes we strive for perfection the path is long and my brothers correct me if i am wrong jazakhahul khairan because this issue has been going for long and its a great concern that limits entire muslim ummah ; ability to act and become divided i ask allah to forgive us our short comings and ouur major and minor sins Allahumma Ameen!.
I think we as an ummah need to learn that people have their own limited area of expertise and we shouldn't be looking to them for other things. Sh. Uthman is gifted in having basic discussions on islam with non Muslims but we shouldn't be looking to him for his analysis of global affairs and politics. He has his lane and he should stay in it.
@@d.bcooper2271but he’s not a muhadith 😅 anyone even just beginning their journey in 3lm should be able to distinguish between the different agendas in the modern paradigm
Hazrat Abu Bakr said: "I have been given the authority over you, and I am not the best of you. If I do well, help me; and if I do wrong, set me right. Sincere regard for truth." There were hadith fabricated later by the Ummayad Dynasty to stop people from criticizing them--need to determine which they are and eliminate them
Masha Allah brother I have a hard time explaining this to my Muslim brothers If only we knew how much destruction of religion, esp the ideal political system of Khulafah e Rashida was carried out by the Ummayids, then only we could rectify our thinking and our attitude towards Muslim rulers
He also said there cannot be two Amirs at the same time, it is FORBIDDEN. Funny how the so called 'Salafis' of today don't follow one of the main Salaf.
From a former madhkhali and a former wajdi fan.. you are right .. these people only care about their money...Messenger of Allah said: "The nations are about to call each other and set upon you, just as diners set upon food." It was said: "Will it be because of our small number that day?" He said: "Rather, on that day you will be many, but you will be like foam, like the foam on the river. And Allah will remove the fear of you from the hearts of your enemies and will throw wahn (weakness) into your hearts." Someone said: "O Messenger of Allah! What is wahn?" He said: "Love of the world and the hatred for death." This is the state .. nobody chose the rulers.. they are cowards .. only care about golden cars
@@budgitechworld6360 - Always. They usually agree but sometimes they disagree If they disagree, it will be a long night....... on my Sega Saturn. War doesn't wait.
@@takaverse8347 - All of them I have long days....... on my Sega Saturn negotiating, building my country's economy, making economic deals with foreign nations, diplomacy.
Ibn Farooqs reasoning is insane. The Ummah is fault for installing these dictators because the army is of the people. But in the same time criticising the rulers is Haram according to these Madkhalis. So the Ummah is at fault but on the same time we arent allowed to change our state by changing the status quo. Great, simply great Mr. Ibn Farooq 👍👍👍
They are devils of the highest order, they job is to keep Muslims disunited and keep the status quo intact. While they normalize ties with their true brethren israel.
@@ezzwizz5219Shariah is top down not bottom up! The people want to be governed by shariah! The supreme law of Allah subhanahu wa’tala not man made laws. Rulers don’t want to rule by the law of Allah because the obligations are heavy upon them and they don’t want to be held to account.
Madkhali are awfully quite these days, must be hard dealing with so many 'Khawarij' that sprung up overnight, speaking against the rulers due to their non support of Palestine...
They are not only allowing Muslims to be slaughtered, they want to normalize ties with the mass murderers of Muslims israel, restrict call to prayers during Ramadan. Holding film festvals were women and men mix freely. Shakira is having a concert in Saudi while bomb drops on babies Paying billions of dollars to football players , WWE stars while Muslims starve. I understand why Allah said the hypocrite is beneath the hellfire on judgement day. That includes those who back them.
criticism and actual rebellion is two different thing. People are confusing Revolution and criticism. Revolution is where you plan to overthrow a leader and their minister. Criticism is where you call out the ruler for the sake of the ruler. You want goodness for the ruler. I’m pretty sure people have called out good rulers in the past. But Revolution is where you plan to overtake the nation through bloodshed and corruption. For the power and not for the sake of the people.
*Claim:* The muslims are in this position because they have stopped praying, giving Zakat and have stopped Fasting. *Reality:* When Saudi Arabia have been bombing Yemen and other muslim countries have been bombing fellow Muslim countries, does this mean they must have been praying and fasting when conducting wars against other Muslims but conveniently stop when it comes to Israel? This logic is absolutely absurd!
To be honest I really enjoy these educational videos I'm actually learning and gaining knowledge every time I watch your videos. jazakallah khair brother.
Blind obedience to the ruler is the reason the army and the people won't revolt. Those people are in fact following the "correct aqeedah" according to the madakhila
Exactly. These false sheikhs are enemies of the ummah. They are telling us to be obedient to corrupt rulers. Bin Salman has contravened Islamic law in the holy Land. Shakira is even doing a concert in said Arabia rn as Palestinian babies are getting bomb. Jahanam will be the abode for every hypocrite.
من اعان ظالما ليدحض بباطله حقا، فقد برئت منه ذمة الله ورسوله. الراوي: عبد الله بن عباس. المحدث: السيوطي. المصدر: الجامع الصغير. الصفحة او الرقم: 8455. خلاصة حكم المحدث: صحيح
The rulers are not to be blamed because they are illegitimate & murtadeen. It is us people who are claimants of Ahlus Sunnah upon whom the burden lies.
Without any ill will towards my Muslim Brother Uthman Farook He and every shiekh/Duat should stop defending the Secular Rulers. If u wont advise them or criticize them for the betterment of the ummah at least dont defnd them The rulers of today are NOT Sahaba RH ☝️🏴🏳️🌍
Uthman started shaking and got very uncomfortable when Dilly of 5Pillars spoke of some Fawahish in Saudi ARabia. That is when I realized Uthman was a saudi paid stooge He got edgy because if his paymasters feel he didnt defend the saudis strongly enough, his pay may be deducted or even cancelled
In the treaty of hudaybiya you had the companions who saw the conditions of the treaty in favour of the quraysh and they voiced this to the prophet. Umar said to the prophet ‘are we not upon the haqq, are you not the messenger of Allah’. But OfCourse the prophet was obeying Allah. So if umar saw something which seemed wrong the same way that musa had no patience with khidr and umar expressed this to the prophet of Allah the same way musa did with khidr, why can’t we speak out against the many clear and far greater violations that are committed. ( not that the prophet or khidr had committed any violations)
The treaty of Al-Hudaybiya has been cited to legitimise making peace with Israel. The treaty of Hudaybiya did not involve giving away muslim land, or foreign enemies occupying muslim land, kafir butchering and killing muslims or Muslims being starved of food, water and electricity. If anything Al-Hudaybiya was a victory for the Muslims. The Messenger of Allâh [peace be upon him] returned from this journey and when he was between Makkah and Madinah, Sûrat Al-Fath was revealed in which Allâh Almighty said (what means): (Verily We have granted you a manifest Victoty: That Allâh may forgive you what preceded of your sin and what will follow, fulfill His favour to you, and guide you to the Straight Way; And that Allâh may help you with powerful help. (Ibn Hisham) It is narrated on the authority of Az-Zuhri that he said: "There was no greater conquest in Islam than Al-Hudaybiyah treaty. People had been used to war, However, when the truce started, war was stopped and the people were safe. People could then meet and talk. When Islam was introduced to any man with some sense, he converted to it. During those years, a great number of people converted to Islam after the treaty; they were as many as all those who embraced Islam before the treaty.' (Ibn Hishâm) You will also notice from the understanding of the classical scholars that Peace treaties can only be executed by the imam of the muslims or his deputy, they cannot exceed 10 years, should ideally be for 4 months, it should be for the benefit of the muslims, if the enemy breaches the treaty they should be fought and that there should be no invalid conditions (giving away 85% of muslim land to the jews or recongising these usurpers/occupiers as valid tenants to the land). Imam Quduri - kitab al Quduri و إن رأي الإمام أن يصالح أهل حرب أو فريقا منهم و كان في ذلك مصلحة للمسلمين فلا بأس به "If the Imam thinks he should make a truce with the the enemy combatants or with a group of them, and in that there is some benefit for the muslims, there is no objection to that." فإن بدؤوا بخيانة قاتلهم و لم ينبذ إليهم إذا كان ذلك باتفاقهم If the enenmy initiates (the breach of the truce) by treachery, (the imam) should fight them and not (formally) renounce the truce to them, if that (breach) was by their agreement. Ibn Qudamah al maqdisi - umdat al fiqh و تجوز مهادنة الكفار إذا رأى الإمام المصلحة فيها، و لا يجوز عقدها إلا من الإمام أو نائبه "It is permissible to have truces with the unbelievers if the Imam finds it beneficial, but this may only be agreed by the imam or his deputy." Zād al-mustaqni- Imam Hajjāwi لا يعقد لغير المجوس و أهل الكتابين و من تبعهم، و لا يعقدها إلا الإمام أو نائبه Covenants should only be made with the Majūs, the people of the book and those who follow them. It should only be initiated by the Imam or his deputy. Al-Tadkirah fi al-fiqh - Ibn Mulaqqin "The Imam or his deputy can make truces with disbelievers for the welfare of the muslims - lasting up to 4 months or up to 10 years due to the weakness of the muslims." Bidayatal mujtahid- Ibn Rushd al Maliki "Those who upheld the permission of making a truce when the imām saw an interest (of the Muslims) in this are Malik, al-Shafii, and Abū Hanīfa, except that al-Shafi stipulated that the duration of the truce should not be for a period greater than the one transacted by the Messenger of Allah (God's peace and blessings be upon him) with the disbelievers in the year of al-Hudaybiya." Minhaj Al-Talibeen - Imam Nawawi The Imam or his deputy has the right to grant an armistice. An armistice is permitted only when there is some advantage for the Muslims; if, for example, we are weak in number ; Or if money and munitions of war fail us... An armistice which though advantageous, is not caused by our weakness. It may be agreed upon for four months or more, provided it is for Less than one year; but if We are weaker, a maximum period of ten years may be stipulated for... an armistice is invalid where no precise period has been stipulated for or where some illegal clause are included in it." Al qawaneen al fiqiyyah - Ibn Juzay Conditions of a peace treaty: "That the Imam takes charge of the matter. That it be free of any invalid conditions, like abandoning a Muslim in their hands or handing money over to them when fear does not exist... That it does not carry on beyond the time necessary for such a settlement based on ijtihad - the judgment of [the Imam|, while Abū Imrãn has said that it is recommended that it does not extend beyond four months, except in the case of incapacity... If we suspect treachery on their part, then it is permitted to default on the agreement before its term."
@@ajalloh20Our scholars for 1400 years have understood this verse to be referring to Jerusalem. Why should we accept a 20th century Zionist interpretation?
@johnwilliams9402 when did the treaty of Hudaybiyah ever have any similarity with the zionists in Israel? Only a fool will make an equivocation between both of them.
Omar R.A criticized Abu Bakr r.a. when He was about to give a peace of land to some people. He gave Him a document and said it is not valid unless Omar r.a. approves of it. When Omar was given this document he tore it apart. Omar came to Abu Bakr to express his displeasure about it.
From day one i saw uthman farooq was a hypocrite its good bro hajji is exposing him. Unfortunately if bro hajji continues like this and stays firm and unbiased he might find himself alone
If we can't go against the rulers, I don't believe Uthman's argument that it's the people's fault. It's not like the people could change it if you can't change the rulers!
his argument is bad leaders born from bad society/environment, if you manage to overthrow bad leader but still normalize sin, then another bad leader will replace the previous one
These Madhkhalis have corrupted the Daawa towards Salaafiyah ie understanding Islam based on the understanding of Salaf u Salih (pious predecessors). From my limited knowledge, we are suppose to obey the rulers on condition he has not committed clear cut Kufr (Kufr Bawaah) and implements Islam in the land. "The Prophet (ﷺ) called us and we gave him the Pledge of allegiance for Islam, and among the conditions on which he took the Pledge from us, was that we were to listen and obey (the orders) both at the time when we were active and at the time when we were tired, and at our difficult time and at our ease and to be obedient to the ruler and give him his right even if he did not give us our right, and not to fight against him unless we noticed him having open Kufr (disbelief) for which we would have a proof with us from Allah." So according to the book 10 Nullifiers of Islam, these rulers are guilty of The Fourth nullifier:Attempting to replace what Allah (G) has revealed [laws of Allah (G)] with manmade laws or those of a taghoot (false deity) or Istihalal making Halal what Allah has made haraam and vice versa. The Eighth Nullifier: Backing or supporting the Kufar and aiding them against the Muslims. So these are clear cut Kufr, they do not deserve total obedience. but muslim obey them since they have no means of removing them and the harm outweighs the good.
The madkhali like to compare the leaders to fathers even tho there is some similarity not alot. So i will do the same, if you have a father that doesn’t pray he is corrupt and openly shows his children this evil, and then the children grow up evil and corrupt, will you blame the children for their evil father or will you blame the father for the evil children?
It goes both ways, my parents are non Muslim, but I accepted Islam without being affected by their evil. However they don’t pray but they still took care of me.
@@denohart4929 Having non Muslim parents & having a Muslim parent who knows right from wrong Islamically are 2 completely different things. A Muslim parent has certain Islamic responsibilities they will be questions about how they raised their child on the day of judgment.
I get what shiekh uthman is saying... the military can perform a coup minimising casualties if they were pious ppl... However, this doesn't negate that rulers have an obligation to protect and serve the ummah..
Brother Hajj you are much more effective when you calm down and speak slowly. Brother Uthman has a right to his opinion, as do you. Both of you have good intentions...no need for bad mouthing and criticizing, as it is not حسن الخلق...good behavior....brother Hajj.
Asalamualaykum Brother, who are alternative scholars we can take from. The people you have mentioned that follow this mindset have extensive playlists on their channel, can you recommend other sources of such knowledge on RUclips?
@benafz they are students of knowledge. I didnt read the scholar part. I read other sources of knowledge. Abdurahman hassan may Allah bless him is an ocean of knowledge for students of knowledge. Get this hate out of your heart coward
A simple question - In what period of Islamic History that we were under a khilafah and everyone had the same 'aqeedah after the time of the sahabah (r.a.)? Actually the first sect of Islam happened during the time of the sahaba (r.a.) (al-khawarij and their beliefs)...
I used to work in a prison. The muslim inmates would call themselves salafi. I would tell them if you truly understood what you were saying, you would be living like the Amish in America.
@BroHajji isnt it possible to invite the persone to an online debate?? wouldnt that be better than making comments n calling names in the absence of the person? wouldnt that be more constructive and educational??
Wrong bro Hajji. Why: 1. Whats the difference between you and shamsi criticising others 2. The neo salafi creed does not totally afrain from attacking the leaders, but under certain conditions, so this point is not rightfully adressed. Please clarify that. 3. Why you say maaliki yaumi deen like that, because this is an aya of the Quran, which you know. We need scjolars that probe diplomatic between muslim groups brother. You seem to refer to taymiyya, he did try so with the hanabila and the ashari creeds. Perhaps we can learn something from that.
I'd like to point out that his claim that it's the Ummahs fault not of the leader. Then what's the point of a leader if he's not correcting his people ? What's the leader doing ? Why isn't this leader then funding the Ummah to learn their deen correctly if Uthmans argument is correct? Not to take away from his knowledge but I'm a firm believer is teach what you're specialised in don't veer off into fields that you have not studied. Ill end on this omar ibn khatab said "what will you do If I wrong you" a believer said "wallahi our swords will correct you"
Just watching his first argument made me cringe and click off the video initially. He acts like its a fair system without nepotism and corruption, across the world, when he should know better.
You guys need to realize that you can follow whoever you want for your personal understanding of Islam but ALL MUSLIMS need to follow ONE person, the one with the most knowledge (of all fiqhs and undrstandings), piety, political understanding etc, for POLITICAL DECISIONS so that we stay united. There is no doubt right now it is Imam Sayyed Ali Khamenei of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Every group or country (Sunni, Shia, Salafi, etc) that takes POLITICAL guidance from him achieves victory
We need to work on ourselves but that also includes speaking out against these rulers like people are doing worldwide. This shows that we are against the evil taking place and we will account those in authority and question them why they don't follow Islam as their Deen and the armies who have capability to fight to check passports instead and stop aid and mujahids or other armies to do the job. They side with Shaytan.
Losing respect for brother Hajji. Even if your point is correct, mocking another person, especially a fellow daee who does good work, publicly is uncalled for and weak. No need for insults and lame jokes.
Brother, although I agree with the fact that this "can't oppose the ruler" claim is ridiculous, given we currently don't have an Islamic state, I believe your videos are not beneficial. You don't seem to be wanting to educate but humiliate other brothers. And honestly, I do not believe you can say anything bad about Sheikh Uthman's knowledge, intentions and effort. I believe you're out of your league with this one. No problem having a reaction video, I support you in that but no need to ridicule.
At the time of musa as, allah swt, did not allow the rain to come due to sinning of one person. Once that one person asked for forgivness, allah swt accepted the duas and the rain came. What kind of lesson can we take from this?
This is not an analogy applicable to the horrors we are facing in Gaza. Withholding of the blessing of rain (provision) due to sinning is different from the umman of 2 billion Muslims asked to watch the genocide and massacre and sheer evil oppression of the Palestinians at the hands of the enemies of Islam instead of taking real action and fighting to free the oppressed. The rulers of the muslim countries are the ones who can and should take this stance. If the Ummah has muslims who are not practicing Islam as they should or even sinning does it mean we should wait till everyone gets their act right like waiting for the rain to fall? There is no means of getting rain except Dua. Yet there are means we can and should take to fight the enemies of Islam
Usman Khan always praise himself (online) and all other movement Olama learn from him (offline) only Salafis wahabi Aqida are right and they will go to Heaven.
I like uthman ibn farooq sometimes but on this how can he say the rulers are not 2 blame. They are the ones imprisoning giant ulema of our time. If the ruler is corrupt do will the people
Hajji, either you don't know the Ahl al-Hadith movement in Hind or you are just intellectual dishonest. Your points in this video are valid on the issue of holding 'umara accountable but your jahl about facts related to Ahl al-Hadith movement 'ulama whom even Shah Waliullah rahimahullah respected is despicable. You lack in history!
I don’t see the benefit of taking cheap shots at sheikh uthman while you know without doubt the brother is calling people to Islam and people who never met him accept Islam.
@@BroHajji the Ummah is weak and that’s why you have weak leaders. Sheikh is calling people to tawhid and the way of ashabul hadith. If people return to Islam then we will have good leaders. The fact all Muslims countries are dealing with riba tells you every thing. Instead of helping spread tawhid, taqwa you’re mocking the people who are doing the work. FYI Being fluent in Arabic is not a requirement to be a sheikh
13:11 Verily! Allâh will not change the condition of a people as long as they do not change their state themselves (by committing sins and by being ungrateful and disobedient to Allâh). But when Allâh wills a people’s punishment, there can be no turning back of it, and they will find besides Him no protector. Honestly it seems like all you do is to resort to ad hominem attacks to so called "agents of gulf rulers" which is laughable at best. What Uthman said made perfect sense and is according to Quran and Sunnah (see above). How can we expect Allahs victory when the whole Ummah is split on virtually every issue and fights among itself? How can we expect Allahs victory when we follow our whims and desires and ignore Quran and Sunnah? When the streets are full of protests with music, dancing, mixing of men and women..... while the Masajid are empty? It is easy to shift the blame on the rulers and yes they are not perfect. But speaking from an islamic standpoint, free of emotion, the people as a whole are at fault by abandoning the deen.
I believe the reason a lot Muslims don't openly criticize the rulers, is so they can travel to said countries, especially SA for hajj. Another thing to consider is, is there a path to unite the Ummah that doesn't involve radical and violent changes? Our predecessors were better than us but also it was a different time. Just keeping an open mind to different ways to unite the Ummah Inch'Allah Allah Knows Best
I have one question for those who support leaders, if I was to go to any border saudia, jordon, Egypt and say i will cross over to Gaza to support our brothers what will happen to me? because we all know I would get arrested and would disappear. now if the leaders were to accept this then it's clear who they are working for.
Use your time for productive things. Go on and criticize him as much as you want, he isn't holding you from doing whatever you like. Go ahead and criticize the leaders.
I don’t understand, I believe there is a clear hadith that says to not criticize rulers, and how to advice them. We follow the Quran and Sunnah. If my knowledge is wrong please clarify me.
@@Haze_in-bw7ff It has been narrated on the authority of Ibn 'Umar that the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) said: It is obligatory upon a Muslim that he should listen (to the ruler appointed over him) and obey him whether he likes it or not, except that he is ordered to do a sinful thing. If he is ordered to do a sinful act, a Muslim should neither. listen to him nor should he obey his orders.
@@Haze_in-bw7ff According to my knowledge we always obey the ruler whether we like it or not, that is until we are ordered to do something that goes against the Quran and Sunnah.
@@Haze_in-bw7ff ‘Iyad ibn Ghanam reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Whoever has advice for the ruler, let him take his hand and give it privately. If he accepts it, then he accepts it. If he rejects it, the duty upon him has been fulfilled.” Source: al-Sunnah li-Ibn Abī ‘Āṣim 1098 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani
I think he's an Aston Villa supporter. He lives in Birmingham so the only other option would be Birmingham City, but they're from the Ahle bidah, so definitely belongs to the Villains.
![Kodak Black - Catch Fire [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/A4ch-olIuZo/mqdefault.jpg)
*Claim:* We need to perfect ourselves. Once this is done then Islam will prevail
*Reality:* Perfection has never been a condition or prerequisite to perform Jihad against the disbelievers. If anything we know of the companion Nuayman ibn Amr who for a period of time found it difficult to overcome an alcohol addiction. Yet he was still a ghazi in the battles of Badr, Uhud and Khandaq
Also these madakhila consider the Saudi regime their leaders they have an army, so what has the muslim ummah have to do with the saudi regime stepping upto the plate.
@@jarirmuthana5642💯
To be honest this is something i am confused as well and frustrates me because we cannot be perfect only Allah (SWT) is , so when i hear that we have to be perfect i dont understand but yes we strive for perfection the path is long and my brothers correct me if i am wrong jazakhahul khairan because this issue has been going for long and its a great concern that limits entire muslim ummah ; ability to act and become divided i ask allah to forgive us our short comings and ouur major and minor sins Allahumma Ameen!.
It's a straw man argument. They want Muslims to chase after perfection never achieving it never holding the leaders accountable.
❤💯
☝️🏴🏳️🌍
I think we as an ummah need to learn that people have their own limited area of expertise and we shouldn't be looking to them for other things. Sh. Uthman is gifted in having basic discussions on islam with non Muslims but we shouldn't be looking to him for his analysis of global affairs and politics. He has his lane and he should stay in it.
100%
Baraqallahu feek. You summed it up very good.
This is the best comment I have seen on the subject . Thank you
They wrongfully assume that if you have deep knowledge of Hadeeth then you must know every field of knowing
@@d.bcooper2271but he’s not a muhadith 😅 anyone even just beginning their journey in 3lm should be able to distinguish between the different agendas in the modern paradigm
Hazrat Abu Bakr said: "I have been given the authority over you, and I am not the best of you. If I do well, help me; and if I do wrong, set me right. Sincere regard for truth." There were hadith fabricated later by the Ummayad Dynasty to stop people from criticizing them--need to determine which they are and eliminate them
Masha Allah brother
I have a hard time explaining this to my Muslim brothers
If only we knew how much destruction of religion, esp the ideal political system of Khulafah e Rashida was carried out by the Ummayids, then only we could rectify our thinking and our attitude towards Muslim rulers
This Hadith shows his humility not that he wasn’t the best among them. He was the best among them
@@BlackJack-lg3vx my point is he said if I do wrong set me right
@BlackJack-lg3vx chill out. Whether it's humility or sincerity, the point is clear.
He also said there cannot be two Amirs at the same time, it is FORBIDDEN.
Funny how the so called 'Salafis' of today don't follow one of the main Salaf.
From a former madhkhali and a former wajdi fan.. you are right .. these people only care about their money...Messenger of Allah said: "The nations are about to call each other and set upon you, just as diners set upon food." It was said: "Will it be because of our small number that day?" He said:
"Rather, on that day you will be many, but you will be like foam, like the foam on the river. And Allah will remove the fear of you from the hearts of your enemies and will throw wahn (weakness) into your hearts." Someone said: "O Messenger of Allah! What is wahn?" He said: "Love of the world and the hatred for death."
This is the state .. nobody chose the rulers.. they are cowards .. only care about golden cars
I criticize rulers. I use constructive criticism so the people and the ruler can learn and become better.
Have any of the rulers given you any feedback?
Bro what ruler do you give feedback to 😂
@@budgitechworld6360 - Always. They usually agree but sometimes they disagree
If they disagree, it will be a long night....... on my Sega Saturn. War doesn't wait.
@@takaverse8347 - All of them
I have long days....... on my Sega Saturn negotiating, building my country's economy, making economic deals with foreign nations, diplomacy.
@@danoneall4013 😂😂😂👌🏽
Ibn Farooqs reasoning is insane. The Ummah is fault for installing these dictators because the army is of the people. But in the same time criticising the rulers is Haram according to these Madkhalis. So the Ummah is at fault but on the same time we arent allowed to change our state by changing the status quo. Great, simply great Mr. Ibn Farooq 👍👍👍
They are devils of the highest order, they job is to keep Muslims disunited and keep the status quo intact. While they normalize ties with their true brethren israel.
his argument is reasonable, if we as ummah normalize sin then the leader born from that ummah will be bad leader....
@@ezzwizz5219 do you understand the word "dynasty"?
These rulers do not come from the people.
@@FRD-HDD but their soldier and manpower still come from people
@@ezzwizz5219Shariah is top down not bottom up! The people want to be governed by shariah! The supreme law of Allah subhanahu wa’tala not man made laws. Rulers don’t want to rule by the law of Allah because the obligations are heavy upon them and they don’t want to be held to account.
Madkhali are awfully quite these days, must be hard dealing with so many 'Khawarij' that sprung up overnight, speaking against the rulers due to their non support of Palestine...
The only group of Muslims who are not with the billions of Muslims.
They are not only allowing Muslims to be slaughtered, they want to normalize ties with the mass murderers of Muslims israel, restrict call to prayers during Ramadan. Holding film festvals were women and men mix freely.
Shakira is having a concert in Saudi while bomb drops on babies
Paying billions of dollars to football players , WWE stars while Muslims starve.
I understand why Allah said the hypocrite is beneath the hellfire on judgement day. That includes those who back them.
Please don't use Allah swt's words as a sarcasm.
True. It was very uncomfortable to watch him using the verse of Quran for mocking someone. 😞
and he keeps repeating these little 'taunts'. These videos would be more beneficial if all that nonsense is removed. smh
Yeah it's not how Muslims should behave.
Uthman Ibn Farooq lost the respect of so many Muslims
I used to watch his video but not anymore because they are sectarian.
criticism and actual rebellion is two different thing. People are confusing Revolution and criticism. Revolution is where you plan to overthrow a leader and their minister.
Criticism is where you call out the ruler for the sake of the ruler. You want goodness for the ruler. I’m pretty sure people have called out good rulers in the past.
But Revolution is where you plan to overtake the nation through bloodshed and corruption. For the power and not for the sake of the people.
exactly
Don't use a Quran verse to make fun of someone. It is disrespectful to the Quran.
Uthman farooq has been given a boost by youtube to fool the ignorant masses. If he was a sincere scholar he would have been censored
The madkhalis and super salafis are 2 sides of the same wretched coin
*Claim:* The muslims are in this position because they have stopped praying, giving Zakat and have stopped Fasting.
*Reality:* When Saudi Arabia have been bombing Yemen and other muslim countries have been bombing fellow Muslim countries, does this mean they must have been praying and fasting when conducting wars against other Muslims but conveniently stop when it comes to Israel?
This logic is absolutely absurd!
To be honest I really enjoy these educational videos I'm actually learning and gaining knowledge every time I watch your videos. jazakallah khair brother.
Blind obedience to the ruler is the reason the army and the people won't revolt. Those people are in fact following the "correct aqeedah" according to the madakhila
Exactly. These false sheikhs are enemies of the ummah. They are telling us to be obedient to corrupt rulers. Bin Salman has contravened Islamic law in the holy Land. Shakira is even doing a concert in said Arabia rn as Palestinian babies are getting bomb.
Jahanam will be the abode for every hypocrite.
Wow...very smart, u know revolts are going to get you in trouble with the Gov of any country
Mashallah great video. We have to expose those that pose as scholars when they are not, even if they are good in interfaith debates
من اعان ظالما ليدحض بباطله حقا، فقد برئت منه ذمة الله ورسوله. الراوي: عبد الله بن عباس. المحدث: السيوطي. المصدر: الجامع الصغير. الصفحة او الرقم: 8455. خلاصة حكم المحدث: صحيح
The rulers are not to be blamed because they are illegitimate & murtadeen. It is us people who are claimants of Ahlus Sunnah upon whom the burden lies.
In islam you can critize a corrupt a ruler.
Without any ill will towards my Muslim Brother Uthman Farook
He and every shiekh/Duat should stop defending the Secular Rulers.
If u wont advise them or criticize them for the betterment of the ummah at least dont defnd them
The rulers of today are NOT Sahaba RH
☝️🏴🏳️🌍
If they dont defend they wont get their monthly paycheques.
Uthman started shaking and got very uncomfortable when Dilly of 5Pillars spoke of some Fawahish in Saudi ARabia. That is when I realized Uthman was a saudi paid stooge
He got edgy because if his paymasters feel he didnt defend the saudis strongly enough, his pay may be deducted or even cancelled
In the treaty of hudaybiya you had the companions who saw the conditions of the treaty in favour of the quraysh and they voiced this to the prophet. Umar said to the prophet ‘are we not upon the haqq, are you not the messenger of Allah’. But OfCourse the prophet was obeying Allah.
So if umar saw something which seemed wrong the same way that musa had no patience with khidr and umar expressed this to the prophet of Allah the same way musa did with khidr, why can’t we speak out against the many clear and far greater violations that are committed. ( not that the prophet or khidr had committed any violations)
The treaty of Al-Hudaybiya has been cited to legitimise making peace with Israel. The treaty of Hudaybiya did not involve giving away muslim land, or foreign enemies occupying muslim land, kafir butchering and killing muslims or Muslims being starved of food, water and electricity.
If anything Al-Hudaybiya was a victory for the Muslims.
The Messenger of Allâh [peace be upon him] returned from this journey and when he was between Makkah and Madinah, Sûrat Al-Fath was revealed in which Allâh Almighty said (what means): (Verily We have granted you a manifest Victoty: That Allâh may forgive you what preceded of your sin and what will follow, fulfill His favour to you, and guide you to the Straight Way; And that Allâh may help you with powerful help. (Ibn Hisham)
It is narrated on the authority of Az-Zuhri that he said: "There was no
greater conquest in Islam than Al-Hudaybiyah treaty. People had been used to war, However, when the truce started, war was stopped and the people were safe. People could then meet and talk. When Islam was introduced to any man with some sense, he converted to it. During those years, a great number of people converted to Islam after the treaty; they were as many as all those who embraced Islam before the treaty.'
(Ibn Hishâm)
You will also notice from the understanding of the classical scholars that Peace treaties can only be executed by the imam of the muslims or his deputy, they cannot exceed 10 years, should ideally be for 4 months, it should be for the benefit of the muslims, if the enemy breaches the treaty they should be fought and that there should be no invalid conditions (giving away 85% of muslim land to the jews or recongising these usurpers/occupiers as valid tenants to the land).
Imam Quduri - kitab al Quduri
و إن رأي الإمام أن يصالح أهل حرب أو فريقا منهم و كان في ذلك مصلحة للمسلمين فلا بأس به
"If the Imam thinks he should make a truce with the the enemy combatants or with a group of them, and in that there is some benefit for the muslims, there is no objection to that."
فإن بدؤوا بخيانة قاتلهم و لم ينبذ إليهم إذا كان ذلك باتفاقهم
If the enenmy initiates (the breach of the truce) by treachery, (the imam) should fight them and not (formally) renounce the truce to them, if that (breach) was by their agreement.
Ibn Qudamah al maqdisi - umdat al fiqh
و تجوز مهادنة الكفار إذا رأى الإمام المصلحة فيها، و لا يجوز عقدها إلا من الإمام أو نائبه
"It is permissible to have truces with the unbelievers if the Imam finds it beneficial, but this may only be agreed by the imam or his deputy."
Zād al-mustaqni- Imam Hajjāwi
لا يعقد لغير المجوس و أهل الكتابين و من تبعهم، و لا يعقدها إلا الإمام أو نائبه
Covenants should only be made with the Majūs, the people of the book and those who follow them. It should only be initiated by the Imam or his deputy.
Al-Tadkirah fi al-fiqh - Ibn Mulaqqin
"The Imam or his deputy can make truces with disbelievers for the welfare of the muslims - lasting up to 4 months or up to 10 years due to the weakness of the muslims."
Bidayatal mujtahid- Ibn Rushd al Maliki
"Those who upheld the permission of making a truce when the imām saw an
interest (of the Muslims) in this are Malik, al-Shafii, and Abū Hanīfa, except
that al-Shafi stipulated that the duration of the truce should not be for a period greater than the one transacted by the Messenger of Allah (God's peace and blessings be upon him) with the disbelievers in the year of al-Hudaybiya."
Minhaj Al-Talibeen - Imam Nawawi
The Imam or his deputy has the right to grant an armistice. An armistice is permitted only when there is some advantage for the Muslims; if, for example, we are weak in number ; Or if money and munitions of war fail us... An armistice which though advantageous, is not caused by our weakness. It may be agreed upon for four months or more, provided it is for Less than one year; but if We are weaker, a maximum period of ten years may be stipulated for... an armistice is invalid where no precise period has been stipulated for or where some illegal clause are included in it."
Al qawaneen al fiqiyyah - Ibn Juzay
Conditions of a peace treaty:
"That the Imam takes charge of the matter.
That it be free of any invalid conditions, like abandoning a Muslim in their hands or handing money over to them when fear
does not exist... That it does not carry on beyond the time necessary for such
a settlement based on ijtihad - the judgment of [the Imam|, while
Abū Imrãn has said that it is recommended that it does not extend
beyond four months, except in the case of incapacity... If we suspect treachery on their part, then it is permitted to default on the agreement before its term."
@@johnwilliams9402 seems you used your mi5 account john
@@MrGee2468Israeli is not Muslim land. Read Surah 5 verse 20 to 21. Al asqa is in Saudi Arabia not Israel. Stop indoctrination look at the facts.
@@ajalloh20Our scholars for 1400 years have understood this verse to be referring to Jerusalem. Why should we accept a 20th century Zionist interpretation?
@johnwilliams9402 when did the treaty of Hudaybiyah ever have any similarity with the zionists in Israel? Only a fool will make an equivocation between both of them.
David Wood, Sam Simoun and CP are clapping hands and smiling from ear to ear right now.
They only come out when Ummah at turning point or change about to happen
it's difficult to even try follow your arguments when the Adaab you showcase are so reprehensible. May Allah (SWT) guide us and forgive us ameen
Omar R.A criticized Abu Bakr r.a. when He was about to give a peace of land to some people. He gave Him a document and said it is not valid unless Omar r.a. approves of it. When Omar was given this document he tore it apart. Omar came to Abu Bakr to express his displeasure about it.
From day one i saw uthman farooq was a hypocrite its good bro hajji is exposing him. Unfortunately if bro hajji continues like this and stays firm and unbiased he might find himself alone
It always baffles me why they quickly put the blame on the Umma.
If we can't go against the rulers, I don't believe Uthman's argument that it's the people's fault. It's not like the people could change it if you can't change the rulers!
his argument is bad leaders born from bad society/environment, if you manage to overthrow bad leader but still normalize sin, then another bad leader will replace the previous one
These Madhkhalis have corrupted the Daawa towards Salaafiyah ie understanding Islam based on the understanding of Salaf u Salih (pious predecessors). From my limited knowledge, we are suppose to obey the rulers on condition he has not committed clear cut Kufr (Kufr Bawaah) and implements Islam in the land.
"The Prophet (ﷺ) called us and we gave him the Pledge of allegiance for Islam, and among the conditions on which he took the Pledge from us, was that we were to listen and obey (the orders) both at the time when we were active and at the time when we were tired, and at our difficult time and at our ease and to be obedient to the ruler and give him his right even if he did not give us our right, and not to fight against him unless we noticed him having open Kufr (disbelief) for which we would have a proof with us from Allah."
So according to the book 10 Nullifiers of Islam, these rulers are guilty of
The Fourth nullifier:Attempting to replace what Allah (G) has revealed [laws of Allah (G)] with
manmade laws or those of a taghoot (false deity) or Istihalal making Halal what Allah has made haraam and vice versa.
The Eighth Nullifier: Backing or supporting the Kufar and aiding them against the Muslims.
So these are clear cut Kufr, they do not deserve total obedience. but muslim obey them since they have no means of removing them and the harm outweighs the good.
A khalifah was proclaimed but the people chose not to accept it.
و عليكم السلام و رحمة الله و بركاته
The madkhali like to compare the leaders to fathers even tho there is some similarity not alot. So i will do the same, if you have a father that doesn’t pray he is corrupt and openly shows his children this evil, and then the children grow up evil and corrupt, will you blame the children for their evil father or will you blame the father for the evil children?
It goes both ways, my parents are non Muslim, but I accepted Islam without being affected by their evil. However they don’t pray but they still took care of me.
@@denohart4929 Having non Muslim parents & having a Muslim parent who knows right from wrong Islamically are 2 completely different things. A Muslim parent has certain Islamic responsibilities they will be questions about how they raised their child on the day of judgment.
I get what shiekh uthman is saying... the military can perform a coup minimising casualties if they were pious ppl... However, this doesn't negate that rulers have an obligation to protect and serve the ummah..
The betrayal of muslim rulers is sinful, equally complicit are the imams of haramain sharifain legitimising puppet kings in their sermons
Rulers are busy buying $20B F1 and $500 palaces in France.
With the money they stole from the muslims.
Brother Hajj you are much more effective when you calm down and speak slowly. Brother Uthman has a right to his opinion, as do you.
Both of you have good intentions...no need for bad mouthing and criticizing, as it is not حسن الخلق...good behavior....brother Hajj.
Excellent and needed video. JazakAllahkhair (but when the text is in Arabic, it is easier to follow it on screen with Eng Subs)
💯 agree with you. May reward you for effort
MashaAllah thanx forza information 👍
We are to blame
Allah gave us the rulers we deserve
Thank you Haji Bhai. Very beneficial talk. الله تعالى آپ کو جزائے خیر دے۔
I love Bro Hajjis flowers in the background
Asalamualaykum Brother, who are alternative scholars we can take from. The people you have mentioned that follow this mindset have extensive playlists on their channel, can you recommend other sources of such knowledge on RUclips?
Abu taymiyyah. Abdurahman hassan
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 you fanboys even refer to them as scholars now? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@AlMubashiraat
@@benafz virgins feel like their opinions matter now 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@benafz they are students of knowledge. I didnt read the scholar part. I read other sources of knowledge. Abdurahman hassan may Allah bless him is an ocean of knowledge for students of knowledge. Get this hate out of your heart coward
@@benafz stop riding Shamsi meat with no seatbelt. You guys treat him like your Idol tf up lil bro. Unmarried lame ahh boy🤣
When he learn to recite the Quran properly. Well then again I can’t take him seriously
A simple question - In what period of Islamic History that we were under a khilafah and everyone had the same 'aqeedah after the time of the sahabah (r.a.)? Actually the first sect of Islam happened during the time of the sahaba (r.a.) (al-khawarij and their beliefs)...
I used to work in a prison. The muslim inmates would call themselves salafi. I would tell them if you truly understood what you were saying, you would be living like the Amish in America.
So following the quran and sunnah according to the sahaba(that has been promised praradise) becomes a problem?
Not a salafi but that’s a terrible argument lol
Correction: Shaheed Muhammad Mursi... ãmeen.
@BroHajji isnt it possible to invite the persone to an online debate?? wouldnt that be better than making comments n calling names in the absence of the person? wouldnt that be more constructive and educational??
Wrong bro Hajji. Why:
1. Whats the difference between you and shamsi criticising others
2. The neo salafi creed does not totally afrain from attacking the leaders, but under certain conditions, so this point is not rightfully adressed. Please clarify that.
3. Why you say maaliki yaumi deen like that, because this is an aya of the Quran, which you know.
We need scjolars that probe diplomatic between muslim groups brother. You seem to refer to taymiyya, he did try so with the hanabila and the ashari creeds. Perhaps we can learn something from that.
Please somebody tell me the name of the nasheed he uses in his intros , it is so nice.
I'd like to point out that his claim that it's the Ummahs fault not of the leader. Then what's the point of a leader if he's not correcting his people ? What's the leader doing ? Why isn't this leader then funding the Ummah to learn their deen correctly if Uthmans argument is correct? Not to take away from his knowledge but I'm a firm believer is teach what you're specialised in don't veer off into fields that you have not studied. Ill end on this omar ibn khatab said "what will you do If I wrong you" a believer said "wallahi our swords will correct you"
That’s what happens when you study in Madinah university.
Just watching his first argument made me cringe and click off the video initially. He acts like its a fair system without nepotism and corruption, across the world, when he should know better.
You guys need to realize that you can follow whoever you want for your personal understanding of Islam but ALL MUSLIMS need to follow ONE person, the one with the most knowledge (of all fiqhs and undrstandings), piety, political understanding etc, for POLITICAL DECISIONS so that we stay united. There is no doubt right now it is Imam Sayyed Ali Khamenei of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Every group or country (Sunni, Shia, Salafi, etc) that takes POLITICAL guidance from him achieves victory
Khamenei is a shia and shia are kuffar
Rulers will be asked on day of qiyamah why didn't you help Muslims of gaza
5:16 who is being referred to. Not familiar with UK geography.
Sheikh Turaifi is a follower of Wahabi Daaawa, and he is in Saudi Jail in addition to others.
So try to differentiate between them and Madkhalis
We need to work on ourselves but that also includes speaking out against these rulers like people are doing worldwide. This shows that we are against the evil taking place and we will account those in authority and question them why they don't follow Islam as their Deen and the armies who have capability to fight to check passports instead and stop aid and mujahids or other armies to do the job. They side with Shaytan.
You speak you they but you in jail.
What is the link for the talk with Uthman? Was this recent?
Losing respect for brother Hajji. Even if your point is correct, mocking another person, especially a fellow daee who does good work, publicly is uncalled for and weak. No need for insults and lame jokes.
smashed it bro
Funny that they all accuse themsleves of misguidance when they have the same stance on this issue
Akhi fear ALLAH,and shut your trap!
Why? What is he saying that's wrong? Islam is a religion for people who use their aql.
Well said my brother. I agree with the salafs but the real salafs not the Saudi breed sell outs
Brother, although I agree with the fact that this "can't oppose the ruler" claim is ridiculous, given we currently don't have an Islamic state, I believe your videos are not beneficial. You don't seem to be wanting to educate but humiliate other brothers. And honestly, I do not believe you can say anything bad about Sheikh Uthman's knowledge, intentions and effort. I believe you're out of your league with this one. No problem having a reaction video, I support you in that but no need to ridicule.
At the time of musa as, allah swt, did not allow the rain to come due to sinning of one person. Once that one person asked for forgivness, allah swt accepted the duas and the rain came.
What kind of lesson can we take from this?
This is not an analogy applicable to the horrors we are facing in Gaza.
Withholding of the blessing of rain (provision) due to sinning is different from the umman of 2 billion Muslims asked to watch the genocide and massacre and sheer evil oppression of the Palestinians at the hands of the enemies of Islam instead of taking real action and fighting to free the oppressed. The rulers of the muslim countries are the ones who can and should take this stance.
If the Ummah has muslims who are not practicing Islam as they should or even sinning does it mean we should wait till everyone gets their act right like waiting for the rain to fall? There is no means of getting rain except Dua. Yet there are means we can and should take to fight the enemies of Islam
Why is he calling him "Malikil Yawmideen"?
Usman Khan always praise himself (online) and all other movement Olama learn from him (offline) only Salafis wahabi Aqida are right and they will go to Heaven.
You doing a good job keep going
I like uthman ibn farooq sometimes but on this how can he say the rulers are not 2 blame. They are the ones imprisoning giant ulema of our time. If the ruler is corrupt do will the people
rulers and people are both to be blamed
The people are to be blamed for not throwing out bad rulers.
Someone tell umar that the core of the issue is Israel.
سلاطينه means the authrorities
Hajji, either you don't know the Ahl al-Hadith movement in Hind or you are just intellectual dishonest.
Your points in this video are valid on the issue of holding 'umara accountable but your jahl about facts related to Ahl al-Hadith movement 'ulama whom even Shah Waliullah rahimahullah respected is despicable. You lack in history!
I don’t see the benefit of taking cheap shots at sheikh uthman while you know without doubt the brother is calling people to Islam and people who never met him accept Islam.
‘sheikh Uthman 😂- have some respect for yourself
@@BroHajjiwell you are no sheikh either so I don’t even know why you laughing
@@BroHajji the Ummah is weak and that’s why you have weak leaders. Sheikh is calling people to tawhid and the way of ashabul hadith. If people return to Islam then we will have good leaders. The fact all Muslims countries are dealing with riba tells you every thing. Instead of helping spread tawhid, taqwa you’re mocking the people who are doing the work. FYI Being fluent in Arabic is not a requirement to be a sheikh
❤️🇦🇱
13:11
Verily! Allâh will not change the condition of a people as long as they do not change their state themselves (by committing sins and by being ungrateful and disobedient to Allâh). But when Allâh wills a people’s punishment, there can be no turning back of it, and they will find besides Him no protector.
Honestly it seems like all you do is to resort to ad hominem attacks to so called "agents of gulf rulers" which is laughable at best. What Uthman said made perfect sense and is according to Quran and Sunnah (see above). How can we expect Allahs victory when the whole Ummah is split on virtually every issue and fights among itself? How can we expect Allahs victory when we follow our whims and desires and ignore Quran and Sunnah? When the streets are full of protests with music, dancing, mixing of men and women..... while the Masajid are empty? It is easy to shift the blame on the rulers and yes they are not perfect. But speaking from an islamic standpoint, free of emotion, the people as a whole are at fault by abandoning the deen.
What about Ottomans and Seljuks who were immersed in Bidah yet achieved victory after victory??
May Allah guide sheikh Uthman. Obviously he can't speak arabic.
Don't be so harsh most likely he does know Arabic.
Im not currupt
I believe the reason a lot Muslims don't openly criticize the rulers, is so they can travel to said countries, especially SA for hajj.
Another thing to consider is, is there a path to unite the Ummah that doesn't involve radical and violent changes?
Our predecessors were better than us but also it was a different time.
Just keeping an open mind to different ways to unite the Ummah Inch'Allah
Allah Knows Best
that is MIAW?
Victorian manhaj.
I have one question for those who support leaders, if I was to go to any border saudia, jordon, Egypt and say i will cross over to Gaza to support our brothers what will happen to me? because we all know I would get arrested and would disappear. now if the leaders were to accept this then it's clear who they are working for.
Bro why bring this in public, communicate privately
Whats the certification and credebility of this guy?
Do you need certification to speak the truth?
This man is so childish wow
Use your time for productive things. Go on and criticize him as much as you want, he isn't holding you from doing whatever you like. Go ahead and criticize the leaders.
YOU DONT UNDERSTAN HIS POINT, ITS NOT ONLY THE LEADERS ITS ALL THE PEAOLE UNDER THE LEAEDERS JUST LIKE YOU
Why is man that can’t read Arabic properly still talking
Brother hajji you speak with super salafies as if they have minds.
They are so ignorant.
Superficial.
I don’t understand, I believe there is a clear hadith that says to not criticize rulers, and how to advice them. We follow the Quran and Sunnah. If my knowledge is wrong please clarify me.
There is no hadith that says that don't criticise the rulers or you can't.
@@Haze_in-bw7ff It has been narrated on the authority of Ibn 'Umar that the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) said: It is obligatory upon a Muslim that he should listen (to the ruler appointed over him) and obey him whether he likes it or not, except that he is ordered to do a sinful thing. If he is ordered to do a sinful act, a Muslim should neither. listen to him nor should he obey his orders.
@@Haze_in-bw7ff According to my knowledge we always obey the ruler whether we like it or not, that is until we are ordered to do something that goes against the Quran and Sunnah.
@@Haze_in-bw7ff ‘Iyad ibn Ghanam reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Whoever has advice for the ruler, let him take his hand and give it privately. If he accepts it, then he accepts it. If he rejects it, the duty upon him has been fulfilled.”
Source: al-Sunnah li-Ibn Abī ‘Āṣim 1098
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani
@@Haze_in-bw7ff Also the hadith clearly shows us how to advise our leaders and the obligation upon us.
4:31 did he just invited us to uprise and overthrow those who dosent represent us properly? so those who are not corrupt take next step?
As we shld
Do you follow the Quran and Sunna?
Anything this guy says do the opposite
why u just stayin in UK go fight go why u waiting for as u claim these Leaders or others go man go0ooo
Which group you are from
Wahabi salafi or deobandi
I think he's an Aston Villa supporter. He lives in Birmingham so the only other option would be Birmingham City, but they're from the Ahle bidah, so definitely belongs to the Villains.
loool @@wackypeace1135
I'm Muslim
@@wackypeace1135 i asked which group?
Deobandi Wahabi salafi
What is ahle biddah?
@@shoislam2729 you shouldn't ask which group people belong to, it is divisive. If you object to the speaker on any issue then research the topic.
Usman khan 😂
they are qadiani 2.0