Thanks for your feedback Sobieski, and yes, I do apologise for the quality of the sound on this video. As you can see, I filmed the whole thing in the reality theatre at the QR Experience Centre. I fully admit that the viewer experience is so much better when you’re actually there, with images projected onto three walls. I’m guessing that the audio is designed for the room to be full, with the audience’s bodies absorbing much of the sound energy. As it was, I was the only person in there; the sound was therefore bouncing around and there was little I could do to change it, even at the editing stage. However, given that this exhibition will only be open for a relatively short time, I thought it useful to record it and share it with others, despite the poor quality of the sound. To be honest, I’m surprised that QR are quite happy for people to do this on social media (provided you reference their website in the post, as I have done). But then, this project seems to have caused so much public debate, mainly regarding costs and disruptions, that I think the powers that be just want as many people as possible to come onboard. Thank you again for your feedback and I hope it didn’t ruin the video too much for you.
@@kartwheelkarl No, it didn't ruin the video for me. I seem to have wrongly assumed one thing, and your explanation has clarified everything for me, so much gratitude to you. 🙏🙏🙏
Whoever's making these videos needs to check and balance the audio levels and fine tune the audio engineering.
Thanks for your feedback Sobieski, and yes, I do apologise for the quality of the sound on this video. As you can see, I filmed the whole thing in the reality theatre at the QR Experience Centre. I fully admit that the viewer experience is so much better when you’re actually there, with images projected onto three walls. I’m guessing that the audio is designed for the room to be full, with the audience’s bodies absorbing much of the sound energy. As it was, I was the only person in there; the sound was therefore bouncing around and there was little I could do to change it, even at the editing stage. However, given that this exhibition will only be open for a relatively short time, I thought it useful to record it and share it with others, despite the poor quality of the sound. To be honest, I’m surprised that QR are quite happy for people to do this on social media (provided you reference their website in the post, as I have done). But then, this project seems to have caused so much public debate, mainly regarding costs and disruptions, that I think the powers that be just want as many people as possible to come onboard. Thank you again for your feedback and I hope it didn’t ruin the video too much for you.
@@kartwheelkarl No, it didn't ruin the video for me. I seem to have wrongly assumed one thing, and your explanation has clarified everything for me, so much gratitude to you. 🙏🙏🙏