Lol He completely twists facts and it is usually very easy to prove . He has full confidence in the lack of intelligence of his audience and that they will not figure him out . He is correct about his audience rt ?
He is not ant vaccine, he says many times they were needed and helpful for the first two waves. He does question the long term side effects of the vaccines as we all should. It's not anti vaccine or anti science to question this. He asks for more data and open access from the government and pharmaceutical companies. That's what I get out of his videos anyway.
A lot of the medical/scientific community seem a bit biased, they'll jump at any claim stating the possibility of the vaccines being unsafe. They want to follow the "scientific consensus", but often fail to realize that the scientific consensus can be (and has often been) wrong. I just wish I could express this simple idea to people outside of our community, science isn't always correct, but it's way too hard.
I've watched a lot of Campbell's videos, and he was always pro vax. He has shifted more recently to reflect the fact that the new strains are less deadly. Now it is of little benefit for most people to be repeatedly boosted, especially if they have natural immunity. Sure Campbell makes some honest mistakes, but he does not purposefully deceive his audience. This video is an unfair attack upon Campbell, and is no more than a small man, chopping down a tall tree, so he can stand on its stump to raise his stature.
@@tonyr4873 He has shifted well before that, Tony R. Well, well before that. There is nothing unfair about pointing out how disingenuous Campbell has become.
How is he using pseudoscience, when all he does is review and explain published data and medical studies?? He isn't making anything up. He is literally just reviewing the published scientific data that is currently available.
It doesn't matter. People are supposed to only get the side that marketing pays for. 70% of all ads are paid by pharma in the us. Campbell messes that up.
@@NathansHVAC It doesn't matter that he only reviews published scientific studies??? What do ads have anything to do with it? Your response makes no sense.
@@GemyniMoodJuice I'm just saying the politically correct side. Science is just what pharma says science is. They fund 90% of the medical science. Tobacco did the same thing for a very long time. You can't win without $$$.
"reviewing" and "explaining" published data and medical studies does not mean you *correctly* review and explain them. If you then also cherry pick what to show (and promote), while leaving out other stuff and thrashing it, even though it clearly is much higher quality, he's doing pseudoscience. For example, when he uses public data to argue that we may be overcounting COVID deaths by a factor 7, 8, or 9, just because some 80-90% of COVID deaths had pre-existing conditions, he's misrepresenting reality. He is in essence arguing that someone who has cancer who dies in a car crash, died because of the cancer, and not the car crash.
Dr. Campbell admitted he had Vaccinations. What is your definition of Anti-vac? I am assuming most of his viewers are not people who don’t believe in never using Vaccines. People do make mistakes and if someone wants to bring that up that’s OK. What is your two main reasons for bringing up his topic up?
Yes, but he now says that he will not be taking the booster. Even if he does not wish to take it, he should keep those views to himself. Not taking the booster is a bad idea if offered it.
@@mannguy He has a right to tell people if he’s going to take a booster or not. I don’t wanna speak for him but he probably just believes his immunity is good enough to protect him without a booster. He often says you need to make up your own decision. What is your reasoning for saying it’s a bad idea not to take the booster if I offered it? Thank you for your response GuyMann
@@ryansuter4424The prevailing scientific opinion is that if offered the vaccines one should take them. He should not try to influencve anyone with subjective opinions or unfounded assumptions. Campbell used to provider good advice. but his advice is now very questionable. If he wishes to not take the booster that is up to him, but as an inflencerrather than a scientist hge should kjeep his personal opinions to himself.
@m2s580 you dont seem to know what excess mortality is aware of the pandemic. And the numbers are in excess of that. All cause mortality is also up. Keep googling champ.
@@m2s580 But those very same excess deaths disappeared after the ONS intervened to make them go away... nothing to hide nothing to fear right, why do you lie ^^77 Brigade BOT ALERT^^
lol Cambel twists the information and presents you with half the facts . He knows his audience is not smart at all so he knows he will get away with leading the sheep to the slaughter . Cambel is a dishonest clown a disgrace to our profession .
@@KT-en8pq oh really he does ? Do you think so ? Lol. not everything is in the material / sources so it’s incumbent upon the teacher to give a bit more comprehensive picture . He knows his audience , he knows they can not think critically as easily verifiable from the comments section under his misleading videos. Eg have you seen his vaccine in pregnancy video ? He clearly misleads . It is negligent to NOT ADVICE covid vaccine in pregnancy given the very well documented third trimester pregnancy harms to all mother , fetus / baby . Does he mention the ton of research that clearly shows how important vaccine is in pregnancy ? In fact , he is actually tricky and shows something that even did not actually happen. He literally fits the definition - leading the sheep to slaughter . Do you think he does not know the literature that’s there signifying vaccine in pregnancy ? If he does not know should he even talk about vaccine in pregnancy ? ruclips.net/video/YUBJ5pgx92I/видео.html
@@KT-en8pq so that is one example . Another example is his video regarding mRNA vaccine incorporating into our DNA . Does he even try to give e a full picture ? No . Does he ever tell you that the liver cells used in trial are not found in humans ( they happen in an incredibly rare liver cancer ) . So does he ever say it can not actually happen in humans because we lack those enzymes . Now how many will not vaccinate after listening to that harmful thug ? How many among his sheep used critical thinking to find that out ? So please do not tell me that this thug uses sources . He is a good example of leading the sheep to slaughter If you actually want to educate yourself about COVID start watching TWIV or Medcram. Cambel will uneducate you . ruclips.net/video/Ud_Egjt3vfM/видео.html
@@KT-en8pq do you want a few more videos from other scientists who initially thought Cambel was just making dumb mistakes which could harm people until they tried to correct him . So now we know that he figured out his audience is really really dumb and he can fool them any way he wants and they will never figure it out . Imagine he fooled his audience with pregnancy and vaccine update on Uk site and you can check in comment sr toon how easily did he fool his audience. He knows they are dumbest I’m the world. I mean any surprise there besides being dumb or dishonest what else can be the reason for one to be an antivaxer ?
I see a complete disagreement to what is being said on this video. I would just shut his voice down. He will not listen to the comments and will just drone on with his lies.
@@Sonship1000 a good honest guy who is fighting the good fight , trying to educate those who can be educated against lies perpetuated by the self serving .
Dear Dan please do your homework. Dan, Susan and Greg all made videos before Campbell's YT warnings. You are demonstrating the same level of understanding as he does.
This video is no different than the propaganda CNN puts out. How can Anyone refer to Dr Malone as an anti vaxer ?? He is one of the inventors of the MRNA technology and took 2 CV19 jabs ! Fake news channel … spreading disinformation
Quick question do you understand the difference between disagreeing and fiat out lying, deceiving and misinforming his audience ? By the way he knows his audience is not very smart and they will never figure out this deception - so congratulations
@@MrAWGlossop oh you think I am a grifter like your dad ? No absolutely not . Can you bring any intelligence to the discussion ? No intelligence - no wonder you are an antivaxer
Dr Campbell has just released a video on the Israeli study on the cases of myocarditis and pericarditis in people had had Covid and people that had been vaccinated. He reported the outcome of that study so perhaps you should do a video to debunk the Israeli findings.
The obvious medical criminal sites an old Israeli study to fool the dumbest and misquotes it . Do you think Campbell confidence in the dumbness of his audiences is well placed ? ruclips.net/video/rASCfU6OXVk/видео.html
Please don’t calm that disgrace to medical profession a doctor . He can sell his own mother for a few bucks that is how low that clown can sink. Myocarditis is a well established adverse effect and multiple studies show that. Meta analysis has closely shown that it is8 to 16 times more common with infection. Not just one study . Never look at just one study but interestingly Israeli studies showed the world cardiac complications were way more common with Covid
Just did a search for John Campbell and your video popped up very high in the search. Considering the paltry number of views and subscribers I must assume that it's being artificially boosted as a hit-piece.
Well whatever way Dr Wilson. Video is getting boosted is good for the people to keep that thug Cambel from harming his audience who Cambel purposefully misinforms as he knows his audience is not very smart - Congratulations.
oooh check out the big brain on s0ycapitan! be careful, you lost several million neurons while typing this comment. Take some brain medicines to restore some of it back.
I’m a physician and I disagree with your statement that Dr. Campbell has done damage. He’s creating awareness of issues that should be openly discussed, not dismissed. To question is what science is all about and he backs up his statements with studies. The real problem lies with a lack of scientific discourse about the risks and benefits of a new therapy.
I find it weird that you refer to him as "Dr." Campbell. He's not a medical doctor. He received an honorary Ph.D in 2013 just short before his retirement, from the university where his brother works. The Ph.D is for and I am not kidding, "For creating educational RUclips videos for nurses". Him pretending to be a medical doctor is very unethical.
It’s such a sorry state that a physician like yourself is so ignorant on this subject and yet shameless enough that did not mind exposing her own short comings. If you need help learning you should watch more videos of Dr Wilson also I can help. Please do t call Campbell a doctor as he is disgrace to medical profession . Also he is a not a doctor .
Since you are obviously uneducated in the benefits vs risks of new therapy let’s discuss Also there are studies clearly showing that 1: blood clots are 6 times more common among the unvaccinated 2: myocarditis- 8 to 11 times more common among unvaccinated 3: myocardial infarction - multiple times more common among the unvaccinated even upto a year after unprotected COVID ( getting COVID while unvaccinated) 4: autoimmune diseases 3 times more common among unvaccinated 5: still births 2 to 3 times more common to unvaccinated mothers 6: premature births ( with plethora of life long problems and issues ) 2 to 3 times more common among unvaccinated . 7: 3rd trimester problems much higher in the unvaccinated 8: pulmonary fibrosis with unprotected COVID 9: brain damage from COVID ( shown on MRI ) before and after COVID - UK Biobank study 10: long COVID prevented by vaccine even up-to 91% 11: vaccine has shown promise in treatment of long covid 12: babies of the pregnant who received Covid vaccine in 3rd trimester ( regardless of vaccine or infection status ) were up-to 60 to 70% less likely to even catch Covid in first 6 months
@@WarIsOver-ifyouwantit The explanation is the concern that the spike protein may not lodge in the deltoid but can access the blood stream if aspiration is not performed. You won't see Governments broadcast this message as they mandated the jabs with next to zero knowledge of how an experimental population might react
@@killablooz I'm with you, I'm saying the guy on the video said it's not needed for 30 seconds and yet not a single explanation made to contradict the need to aspirate.
I have watched a lot of dr John's videos, I have seen a lot of others videos. I have all my vax's and I can see why you say what you are but... you lost me when you posted the Dr talking about peoples deaths that died from covid but also had other conditions that were Enhanced by Covid. My father died from a heart attack. His death was ruled it was covid. I fought for 3 months to get it changed as covid was not in his system. Finally got it changed and it changed my mind on conspiracies over deaths via covid. I have now had the original and omicron inflictions. You will not put another booster in me. I have several underlying health conditions that tell me to take as many boosters as possible but Im not getting stuck again. My issue is any dr that does go with the flow that if you get this you will die is outcasted. I think we need to look at all factors.
"My father died from a heart attack. His death was ruled it was covid. I fought for 3 months to get it changed as covid was not in his system." So, you claimed to know better than the doctors. Here's a causality chain: COVID - heart damage - heart attack - death.
@@Marco-it2mr The true causality is more likely to be the "Safe and effective" - Myocarditis - Cardiac arrest - death. And as far as you belittling someone who has just lost his father all I can say is that you are fortunate that these conversations happen on line ,you little piss ant.
@@drmopgames No, having the original diagnosis changed does not necessarily mean the original diagnosis was wrong. If you are a doctor and get badgered all the time by someone, it is not that hard to ultimately just give in. Of course, you cannot change a death certificate, so at best it has been amended, and we'll just have to believe, for some reason, that James J is correctly telling us what happened.
@@Marco-it2mr he never said his father had covid, either prior to his death or when he had the heart attack. Maybe he never had it at all? It could have been the vaccine as well, it has been known to have that side effect even if you don't want to hear it. I knew 2 people who died from 'heart attacks' within a month of taking up the second vaccine and several others who suffered health issues ranging from stroke to thrombosis and one who's death was inexplicable, all within the first four months of the rollout, apart from the sudden death, that was recent but just after she had got the booster as she was about to travel abroad.. I've never known 9 people to get sick or die in such a short period time in my 43 years of life. I know a nurse who vaccinates people all day long for the past 15 odd months and told me ambulances are there multiple times daily to take people who've reacted to the vaccine. Who knows what happened next? I don't know why anyone would defend such a vaccine..I'd only assume fear of covid consumed them. My nurse friend told me not to take the mrna vaccine and said none of the Novavax patients she's administered it to have reacted once thus far. I'm still not taking the risk. Had covid 3 months ago unvaccinated so I'm fine with natural immunity. I'd rather die fighting covid then randomly because I chose to shoot up.
Information we all need to know: I was Army medic and studied immunology too. When you have natural protection your body produces 20-30 variant antibodies. If you have a vaccine for the same disease it suppresses your natural immunity . And can weaken it. A vaccine is very specific and often only includes part of a pathogen. Hence why vaccinated people keep getting it over and over (no or limited variant antibodies). For example- I was at hospital a few weeks ago. I said to the consultant that she didn't need to wear a mask as my anti body levels are 18.5 times higher than necessary immunity levels (in Portugal they give immunity levels and what your levels are). She said, "Well I had antibodies but still got it " I said, "Then you clearly had it asymptomatically but then got vaccinated which would have weakened your immunity. That's why you got it again" She replied- "Yes, I suppose you are right". She knew what I was taking about. No other diseases have they said you need a vaccine after getting it- only with this did they start this bullshit. I love talking to doctors because, once reminded of the science, they wake up from their hypnotised state. Even when I went to get my antibody test, a year after having it, the doctors said, "Take this to see 'IF' you have antibodies". I quickly retorted "Doc, you know as well as I do that, if I didn't, I'd still be ill!" . This woke him up from the hypnotism of media repetition, and he said- "Oh yes! Of course!". The experts that know this have been kept away from us and not interviewed by MSM. Think about it - tens of thousands of NHS doctors still hadn't been vaccinated but none were interviewed. The only reason Dr James was is because he intercepted a live interview 70,000 doctors in the USA formed an organisation against what they saw was a scam but Google took their website down . 80,000 did the same in the EU. Again the media silenced them. Why have we never heard why they did that - from them? Most nurses and doctors are too scared to speak out. Like NAZI Germany we are told not to listen to them. Like the 1940s Germans- Are we really fully informed if we only hear everything explained via the governing authority?
@@mikeedwards1096 "When you have natural protection your body produces 20-30 variant antibodies. " And as someone who has studied immunology knows, most of those *do nothing*, and several bind too weak to do much. "If you have a vaccine for the same disease it suppresses your natural immunity . " Citation needed! "Hence why vaccinated people keep getting it over and over (no or limited variant antibodies). " I guess that explains all those people with breakthrough infection after prior infections. "I said to the consultant " So, you wow'ed the consultant with nonsense. "No other diseases have they said you need a vaccine after getting it- only with this did they start this bullshit. " Really? Is this why you get influenza vaccines *even after you have gotten it before?* (rhetorical question, the answer is "no"). And guess what works against shingles, a reactivation from a prior infection: vaccination! Good to hear you *were* an Army medic. If you spread around this nonsense while still an Army medic, your superiors should strongly consider pushing you into a position where you can do little harm with so much pontification based on poor knowledge about vaccines.
The mycarditis scare is such a crock. I have imaged thousands of hearts during the Pandemic and not seen 1 case from the vaccine. Did you know Myocarditis is caused by viruses?
@@Ricardofromage do you think every body is sold out like your dad was ? Also do you think you were make this statement if you had a working brain to figure out what Dr Wilson actually is saying or where he is wrong ?
Aspirating for intramuscular injections is standard practice.. checking your not going to dump your load into a vein or artery. If that's changed or wrong someone let me know.
I asked my GP about this as well, and he still does it. Because despite the 'overall risk' being low, it's not zero. And while 'low' might be ok statistically, it's not nothing for the one person that actually ends up lucking out. This is what I think MANY people seemingly forgot. Overall risks might be low, and at a population level that's OK. That doesn't mean it's zero that and it's no comfort to those that do end up lucking out, whether that's with aspiration risk, vaccine side effect risk and so on. But..apparently that doesn't really matter.
@@jjamo1225 If you press the "show more" keywords in the description that is directly below the video itself and then scroll down there is a link "5 reasons to not aspirate" I tried to post the link itself here to help you but YT often does not allow commenters to post links.
Thanks for this and can you direct me to the independent studies showing the safety and efficacy of the Pfizer/Moderna vaccinations? Obviously the Pfizer/Moderna studies will be subjective (because all studies by any organisation producing a product inevitably are) and following the science demands independent studies which are objective. Can you direct me to objective studies that verify the Moderna/Pfizer results?
How about all those population studies done in a multitude of countries? Israel was the first to do so, and had the benefit of only using one vaccine (Pfizer): 97% effectiveness against hospitalization, and 94% against asymptomatic infection - with some potential confounders not present in the RCTs, so could go a little bit in either direction. Obviously, the word "objective" can be interpreted in many ways. I am sure some people desperately want to reject the Israeli findings and thus find a reason to call it "not objective".
@@Marco-it2mr I assume you are a scientist so you will know that retrospective studies are of little value. With so many lives at stake and potential huge windfalls of money, the least that the community could expect are proper double blind placebo studies done on potential vaccinations. I heard that was what was going to be done. Please can you direct me to the results.
@@markking4730 "so you will know that retrospective studies are of little value." As a scientist, I try not to know something that is not true. These 'retrospective studies' (they are in reality PROSPECTIVE studies, as the analysis was determined before the study was started) have good and solid value. Yes, there are some more potential confounders, but real-life data like this is generally MORE valuable, as you have fewer restrictions on the people getting the treatment. "I heard that was what was going to be done." And who told you that nonsense?
@@markking4730 The placebo effect has never been shown for vaccines (it *very* much depends on the treatment), and even if it would work, it does not explain the large effect observed. It *definitely* does not explain why actual infection was observed to be so much reduced. Regarding that placebo effect in anti-depressants, that's ONE example, and one where you have to be a bit careful about interpretation of the claims of a certain group of people vs another. Irving Kirsch is a heavy-hitter in the psychology world - and as a psychologist he cannot prescribe drugs. That gives an unconscious bias against drugs. Regarding my "nonsense" comment, why do you think your link supports your claim? The clinical trial you refer to is sponsored by the vaccine manufacturer! Exactly what you did NOT want to see.
@@markking4730 Irving Hirsch is one of the main pushers of anti-depressants mainly working through the placebo effect. Lots and lots and lots of others put the number much lower AND there's papers that indicate the placebo effect is not nearly as large, but confounded by the infamous "regression to the mean" (see Ben Goldacre's book, Bad Science, for that). Regardless, that placebo effect does not work for infections. And yes, I am sure that I, an active scientist with an h-index of 40, "don't really have a good understanding of the field of science generally".
Dr. John certainly has a very loyal fan base - almost like a cult. Also, they tend to be overwhelmingly anti-covid-vax. They've certainly swarmed the comment section of this video.
Actually that's incorrect. Campbell was once pro-vax. None of us listened to him then. Trump was pro-vax, none of us listened to him either. Yet you call fans of either man cultists. Here's when you know you're in a cult: When the cult leader says "inject this into your body" and you do as commanded. When the cult leader says, "put this over your face and stay inside a confined space with your loved ones along with a deadly virus" and you do as commanded. When the cult leader says "if your family members catch the virus you cannot visit them in the hospital and they must die alone and afraid" and you accept it and don't hold a brutal grudge and despise that leader for the rest of your life. When your leader tells you "those with whom you disagree with are in a cult" and you go around calling everyone you disagree with a cultist on RUclips. That's how you know you're in a cult. You're welcome.
Nurses unwilling to comply with health regulations is like enlisted soldiers enlisting to be pacifists in the heat of warfare and combat! Pacifists need to either comply with military orders to kill or they should go home to civilian life to be aesthetic monks its that simple!
@@xenon2Merchant He ran a poll on his website, asking if viewers thought COVID had evolved naturally or had been leaked from a lab. 84% went with the lab theory. At that point, Campbell realised that the bulk of his audience was conspiracy theorists and he has gone very much to a "cherry Picking" approach, only showing data that supports conspiracies, and ignoring those data which don't. His accounts from last year, at Companies House, show that he's made almost 2 million quid from this approach.
8:33 The circular argument here is hilarious: "the overwhelming majority of these were living independent unassisted lives before covid19 killed them "; so how do we know COVID killed them? Because they were fine until COVID killed them. " They were healthy prior to contracting COVID" would be the intellectually honest way of saying it.
@@janine9115 Because the sentence assumes that covid killed them which is the subject of question. You can't make the conclusion part of the premise. It would be like a prosecution asking "where were you on the night you were murdering people?" rather than "where were you on the night of the murder?"
COVID predominately kills old sick people. That’s absolutely irrefutable. Many who died with COVID would have died from something else within the next couple of years.
How do you know Covid killed them? How does anyone know they died from Covid? The useless PCR test? The excess deaths only started AFTER the injections started in January 2021.
People in the comments are on that hard copium. He preaches peer review and critiques but when he gets critiqued with solid evidence he downplays, hand waives or ignores it. He's pandering to his audience for growth perhaps.
To be fair I can't imagine why anyone would be expected to make videos in reply to videos about them. Why should he care in the slightest about randoms opinions? To say someone is ignoring something they don't know about is so disingenuous.
The reason I'm scared of vaxxes is because every time my Father got the FLU shot, he would get VERY sick for weeks,,,He stopped getting the FLU vax and never got sick like that again. I feel Lucky I learned this from my Dad and I use common sense and stay away from vaxxes.
Unfortunately you haven't learnt anything except to base a fear of vaccines on anecdotal evidence. To add to your research (sample n=1) I and all my family, almost all friends, definitely all colleagues are fully vaxxed for pretty much everything and the only adverse event ( a few of us) felt was a little immunoreactivity after the second mRNA COVID vaccines. I just got a tetanus booster the other day and don't even have a sore arm. Off to vaccinate some race horses - because luck is not how we recommend animals or people deal with infectious disease these days
This video hasn't aged well considering the recent information we've received about Pfizer not testing the vaccines effectiveness at stopping transmission prior to release. Get the jab to save others...
"This video hasn't aged well considering the recent information we've received about Pfizer not testing the vaccines effectiveness at stopping transmission prior to release. " Actually, the comment you make shows how well this video has aged, as Campbell mindlessly jumped on the misinformation bandwagon. Did Pfizer test transmission? No, and that was never claimed by Pfizer or any health authorities. The evidence that it reduced transmission came from numerous studies afterwards. Of course, part of the "save others" was the fact that reduced healthcare burden saves people who would otherwise not have access to healthcare. So, Derrek, do tell, why are you so gullible when you are fed such obvious misinformation by Campbell? Why do you blindly believe him, when ALL the evidence points to Campbell misrepresenting reality?
You do realize there's more to his videos than just reciting what the study says, right? A lot of people use studies to advance opinions that aren't abstractable from the original data itself. I don't know why people have to be so insanely reductive in their need to laud others.
It's actually a sad story. I watched him at first (after SARS-CoV-2 was discovered), but then I saw worse and worse behavior. Then, he started doing the things that he complained about others doing. He was being hypocritical. I called him out, got a few agrees and attacked in general. And he said the points I and others were making were false and misleading. That was the end for me. About three years ago.... Thanks for your efforts in keeping things on track!
Same. The change was slow, but obvious. Hard to know if he made a conscious effort to reel people in with the intention of changing, if it was an unconscious change based on financial gain, or something else entirely.
I was a huge fan of Dr. Campbell at the beginning of the pandemic. But after a while the information he presented started going off the rails. And boy, his comment section is really a cesspool!
The de-evolution of John Campbell is classic audience capture. I was a viewer before his turn.
Год назад+2
It's sad really he was a good source early on but then seems to have had a brainfart. (now this next bit is a joke OK) Probably an effect of the vaccine.
You criticise Dr Campbell for going against the "scientific consensus". As I understand it, "consensus" is not a feature of the scientific method. Am I mistaken?
No you're correct. But the politicization of science has also corrupted science. Now you will hear things like "the Climate Change debate is over" despite no debates having ever taken place. You will also see the term "scientific consensus" used there as well. It's an easy red flag that they are attempting to hijack, misrepresent and redefine science all at the same time. It's what they do with everything. Just look at what they do with language.
@@elenabob4953 Ah yes, The Lancet that has been found to be less than robust of late. The Lancet, whose own editorial opined that "the state of scientific publishing today has never been more precarious" and one Robbie Fox, the great 20th century editor of the Lancet, who was no admirer of peer review, wondered whether anybody would notice if he were to swap the piles marked `publish' and `reject'. He also joked that the Lancet had a system of throwing a pile of papers down the stairs and publishing those that reached the bottom.
The first word spoken in this video, shows that lack of respect by its creator. It's "Doctor" John Campbell. Dr John Campbell is the only Doctor I can name, that reads daily data to the public. And deserves praise for his work.
You know his degree is a PhD, not an MD, right? Just making sure... You could find many doctors of that sort communicating with the public at your local university. While his PhD in nursing education does qualify him to discuss many topics related to medicine, it doesn't mean he's a physician nor does it make him a researcher. For all that he does present actual real research on his channel, it's not always clear he understands it. Worse... It's quite clear his audience often doesn't understand, uses his presentation to affirm their pre-existing views, and he is either indifferent or oblivious to that fact.
I don't think it makes him an antivaxer just because he's included certain people in his videos etc, on the contrary as he's fully vaccinated himself this is a good indicator that he is not an antivaxer. His videos allow people to see how the rest of the world is dealing with the covid situation and has actually given viewer's the opportunity to share their own personal stories in the comments section. He has not discriminated between the vaccinated and unvaccinated he has given everyone the opportunity to share their own opinions and views. John has provided lots of data and has had some very knowledgeable interesting people on his videos. It doesn't surprise me at all that some people are trying to discredit him and his videos as we see this in much of today's "do not question anything" society, and I have never heard of a vaccinated antivaxer? If more data had been made public allowing transparency then perhaps some people wouldn't be so skeptical, I'd say John has given many people peace of mind and tried to provide the data that others should of.
"on the contrary as he's fully vaccinated himself this is a good indicator that he is not an antivaxer. " Right. Just like Robert Kennedy is "not an antivaxer". It's like the racist who says he is not a racist, because he has black friends. "If more data had been made public allowing transparency then perhaps some people wouldn't be so skeptical" Right. What "more data" would you want to be made public? And who do you think it would convince to be less skeptical? We have LOADS of data public, and it is often weaponized - including by Campbell himself - to spread misinformation. I'll give a very obvious example of such misinformation of public data: most people who died from COVID had pre-existing conditions. This is to be expected for almost ANY infectious disease, and even more so if especially the elderly die from such a disease. After all, most elderly have some pre-existing condition. Campbell reported on this, in a very factual way, in April 2020. Almost two years later, that *same* information of most people dying of COVID having pre-existing conditions had become a HUGE revelation and a BIG story, and, according to Campbell, could mean we are overcounting COVID deaths by a factor 7, 8, or 9. Tell me what happened between April 2020 and, ca., January 2022 that made the SAME information go from more or less as expected to a HUGE revelation and a BIG story.
There us a different e between questioning things and lying about them. So is it wrong to tell a liar that he is a liar ? He is a vaccinated antivaxer because he knows that those who love him are not very smart .
@@safeeffective385 He lied about sudden deaths and incorrectly ( purposefully attributed them to vaccine ) He lied about excess deaths and purposefully attributed to the vaccines when clearly it’s more common unvaccinated and causes are well defined . He lied about vaccine in pregnancy and sank incredibly low ( he clearly knows how important vaccine is in pregnancy and how dangerous it is not to advise vaccine in pregnancy ) He mislead people about vaccine incorporating into DNA . He lied and mislead about ivermectin . He lies a lot and many very nice people like Dr Wilson have made videos about his lies
@@safeeffective385 Eg have you seen his vaccine in pregnancy video ? He clearly misleads . It is negligent to NOT ADVICE covid vaccine in pregnancy given the very well documented third trimester pregnancy harms to all mother , fetus / baby . Does he mention the ton of research that clearly shows how important vaccine is in pregnancy ? In fact , he is actually tricky and shows something that even did not even happen - an actual update in guidelines on pregnancy . ruclips.net/video/YUBJ5pgx92I/видео.html
@@safeeffective385 Another example is his video regarding mRNA vaccine incorporating into our DNA . Does he even try to give e a full picture ? No . Does he ever tell you that the liver cells used in trial are not found in humans ( they happen in an incredibly rare liver cancer ) . So does he ever say it can not actually happen in humans because we lack those enzymes . ruclips.net/video/Ud_Egjt3vfM/видео.html
wow clearly a bias review, even your own bias view that helped his popularity while being so silly to also point out that he's been doing this for over a decade (and thus clearly not someone just here for the anti covid rhetoric) and just a "retired nurse"(so clearly he has no paid for agenda). Who are you paid by ?
"and thus clearly not someone just here for the anti covid rhetoric" Didn't really notice the point that he was just getting very few views on his videos...until he suddenly started promoting ivermectin? "so clearly he has no paid for agenda" Look up how much he is making these days with his many subscribers and views. Likely at least ten times as much as he did as a nurse.
@@Marco-it2mr, the fact that Campbell has 100s of times more subscribers than this one and other irrelevant channels, is a clear indication of the numbers of people pushing against the "official narrative". Is it lonely being in the minority now? 🤣
If you put links or words that RUclips doesn't like the comment disappears within 15s. It is extremely annoying when you want to give the source and you can't.
What does 3k likes and 8k comments tell us? I spent 1h calculating and it looks like the ratio of negative to positive comments on this video is at 8 to 1 respectively. So it is fair to assume that 3k likes multiplied by 8 would give this video 24k dislikes. The dodgy website claiming Dr JC fortune number topped it up. Dr Wilson, Dr Wilson... Smelling a bit badly here...
I’m sure an audience that is looking to discredit anyone going against the covid narrative would appreciate this channel. As for me, I’ll think for myself. I’m sorry I listened to this and contribute to the profits from this channel.
"Thinking for myself" translates to: "blindly believing baseless conspiracy theories which other people came up with that I read on Facebook without question while denying scientific facts that are actually supported by evidence". Yeah the epitome of "thinking for yourself" right there everyone!
You speak a lot of the science, would this be the same science that told us the vaccine was both safe an effective? Of course it became quickly clear it's effectiveness is minimal at best. I pray or us all, it's safety doesn't turn out to be as minimal as it's effectiveness.
Yes it has been proven vaccines are safe and effective specially when consider with risking the infection without protection for any given individual . Are there still nut jobs who do not understand this bodes pure a ton of data ?
I'm not sure I have ever heard of a drug or vaccine that is 100% effective. I hope you understand that no vaccine is 100% effective in stopping infection, in fact most reduce infection, thus one doesn't develop full-blown disease. Vaccines attenuate disease and infection, they don't eliminate it (except for smallpox), they never have, but they are still effective.
@@Costa_Conn well actually the only way an infection has been eradicated is via vaccines . We only have a few examples of that . Polio would have been eradicated if not for some antivaxer’s in Afghanistan and Pakistan . One of cattle diseases has been eradicated as well . This is not a function of vaccine but it’s the characteristics of a virus that determine if it will be eradicated . For example the viruses that have a phase in blood our body tends to respond better with our immunity . Our immunity is the same wether we get it from virus or vaccine. So the second important factor is how our body naturally response to the virus. It does not have anything to do with vaccine
Looking at the comments I can see there are people here who give him a pass and people who have gone part ways down the rabbit hole. I would say one thing, if people know that he does that and are okay with it, should they do something he suggests and it ends up costing them their lives, so be it. To damn bad. He really very dishonest and GREEDY. An old man like him becoming greedy at his age. I thought he would have been over that GREED thing by now.
You know what is missing in this video? All the links to the studies that prove your points and that you mention several times. The same which are present, instead, in each and every video from Dr. Campbell.
Stopped watching Campbell's videos about a year ago. Yep, following the science doesn't bring in the $$ as twisting the science. Makes me sad. I used to really like listening to him.
If you actually examined the pharma studies on their products you would be anti-vaccine and anti-pharma. They lie. And they kill when their products don't just make people less well.
How is he not following the Science when he's using peer reviewed studies from government agencies and reliable non profits like WHO and CDC even NGOs with links to go view them for yourself?
As NFD notes, it is indeed untrue that the treatment was successful. Of course the local government still tries to sell it as having been effective, but the people of UP know better. They've seen how many of their family, friends, and locals have died.
John Campbell's supporters really out here in the comment section in full force. funny because he told yall to just ignore his critics, yet here you are.
Based on their grammar and disconnect from comments they're replying to, I wouldn't bet against them being bots. RUclips comments is like Twitter (post-Elon) in terms of moderation.
What an utter DISAPPOINTMENT Campbell has become and no wonder his RUclips channel has received warnings for misinformation. Thank you for this video as I believe your second assertion re a huge increase in revenue has him 'changing his audience'.
Hmmm, okay..... perhaps the most helpful thing you could do is go and debunk yourself - all you've succeeded in doing here is highlighted your obvious non genuine agenda in great, big, flashing neon lights. Now pop along there with your ill-gotten funds, there's a good chap.
John Cambel misinforms purposefully to get clicks from a certain crowd . He does it purposefully as he understands how dumb his audience is . Congratulations Check out other scientists who have proven exactly how he is ? Purposefully) misinforming his dumb audience 😀
I love the way that most comments below dismiss this video without addressing the facts it meticulously lays out. Thank you Dr. Wilson for actually debating the facts and exposing the Campbellcrap.
Yup the benefits of vaccine vs risking infection unprotected are so crystal clear that no body should have to discuss that . Anyway you know there are a lot of nuts out there .
@@Sceince01 The fact that you call mrna therapy as "vaccine" shows crystal clearly you know nothing about natural immunity and mrna technology. That's why this topic should be discussed much frequently.
Actually the data confirms that the mRNA vaccine were even better than we initially thought I agree some who are unable to think keep falling for criminals like Campbell’s lies
Do you think those clowns are just as pathetic liars as Campbell of worse ? Do you have any doubt that clown lies a lot ? Also please don’t call him a Dr , he is a disgrace to medical profession
Wow how much did they pay you to do this one? Dont veer too far away from "the science"(aka what pharmaceutical ads say). John Campbell provides the data and leaves a fair and unbiased perspective. Funny that your video here comes around the same time that the Thai report for adolescent vaccinations came out and he started digging into excess death rates internationally.......
given the move to no longer authorize vaccines for under 50s in the UK, isn't it about time to retract the unfounded attacks on campbell for arguing for a more risk assessed version of vaccine policy.
Interesting that your video channel is monetized, whereas John Campbell's is not - despite him having 3.6 million subscribers - he could make a heck of a lot of money if he chose to. That tells me a lot about his integrity and your (lack of) integrity.
Lol, you mean "As long as Dr Campbell was willing to tell me everything my political bias wants to hear he was A-ok in my book, but then he started looking at all those pesky facts which big brother has taught me to call 'conspiracy theories' & I held on tightly to my seat so I wouldn't fall out of the "safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective" automaton bandwagon I call home.
As you can see from the comment section, trying to discredit someone like Dr Campbell, even though it can help you generate a hundred bucks worth of views (which seems to be your primary objective), might cause people to start doubting you, your motives, and your own credibility, especially if you don't offer a solid proof to back up your claims.
What I can see from the comment section a concerted attempt from the pro Campbell's team of cronies to diss Dr Dan's robust corrections of Campbell's misleading videos. It was by seeing Campbell's blatant screwing up of science papers that led me to Debunk the Funk in the first place. I did have a Science heavy education so could tell who was presenting the truth, and it is not Campbell. Also the people he has attached himself to are a collection of clowns in the extreme. Not one with any integrity.
Since you have brought money into it, the one who has noticeably gained wealth from his videos is indeed Campbell. A hundred bucks is nothing compared to the sums Campbell has accrued, all noted on publicly accessible Companies House. Going from his useful and worthy teaching videos into anti vax mode coincided with huge boost of income.
He is vaccinated and only reports on peer reviewed studies… if that’s what facts are showing, so be it.
Lol
He completely twists facts and it is usually very easy to prove . He has full confidence in the lack of intelligence of his audience and that they will not figure him out . He is correct about his audience rt ?
He was very supportive of the jabs in the early stages.
Yes Fayyaz Qadir . It’s a good thing you are so intelligent
@@Sceince01 good luck with that poison in your arm.
@@Ligerpride you mean the vaccine that has saved 20 million lives and the vaccine only the ignorant dint like ?
He is not ant vaccine, he says many times they were needed and helpful for the first two waves. He does question the long term side effects of the vaccines as we all should. It's not anti vaccine or anti science to question this. He asks for more data and open access from the government and pharmaceutical companies. That's what I get out of his videos anyway.
"That's what I get out of his videos anyway."
That's because you do not realize that he's JAQing off based on misinterpretation of data.
Simple isn’t it . Ask questions like scientific people are meant to .
I’m glad I didn’t take the crap
A lot of the medical/scientific community seem a bit biased, they'll jump at any claim stating the possibility of the vaccines being unsafe. They want to follow the "scientific consensus", but often fail to realize that the scientific consensus can be (and has often been) wrong.
I just wish I could express this simple idea to people outside of our community, science isn't always correct, but it's way too hard.
I've watched a lot of Campbell's videos, and he was always pro vax. He has shifted more recently to reflect the fact that the new strains are less deadly. Now it is of little benefit for most people to be repeatedly boosted, especially if they have natural immunity. Sure Campbell makes some honest mistakes, but he does not purposefully deceive his audience. This video is an unfair attack upon Campbell, and is no more than a small man, chopping down a tall tree, so he can stand on its stump to raise his stature.
@@tonyr4873 He has shifted well before that, Tony R. Well, well before that. There is nothing unfair about pointing out how disingenuous Campbell has become.
How is he using pseudoscience, when all he does is review and explain published data and medical studies?? He isn't making anything up. He is literally just reviewing the published scientific data that is currently available.
It doesn't matter. People are supposed to only get the side that marketing pays for. 70% of all ads are paid by pharma in the us. Campbell messes that up.
@@NathansHVAC It doesn't matter that he only reviews published scientific studies??? What do ads have anything to do with it? Your response makes no sense.
@@GemyniMoodJuice I'm just saying the politically correct side. Science is just what pharma says science is. They fund 90% of the medical science. Tobacco did the same thing for a very long time. You can't win without $$$.
"reviewing" and "explaining" published data and medical studies does not mean you *correctly* review and explain them. If you then also cherry pick what to show (and promote), while leaving out other stuff and thrashing it, even though it clearly is much higher quality, he's doing pseudoscience.
For example, when he uses public data to argue that we may be overcounting COVID deaths by a factor 7, 8, or 9, just because some 80-90% of COVID deaths had pre-existing conditions, he's misrepresenting reality. He is in essence arguing that someone who has cancer who dies in a car crash, died because of the cancer, and not the car crash.
@@Marco-it2mr There are tons of examples of with and not because.
Oh how hard they work to discredit this honorable doctor who has brought truth and light to a dark, corrupted chapter in our history.
You nailed it!..💁♀️
@@krook5158 he is a doctor in computer studies
Why don't you ask some nurses who worked on covid wards and risked their own lives
Dr. Campbell admitted he had Vaccinations. What is your definition of Anti-vac? I am assuming most of his viewers are not people who don’t believe in never using Vaccines. People do make mistakes and if someone wants to bring that up that’s OK. What is your two main reasons for bringing up his topic up?
Yes, but he now says that he will not be taking the booster. Even if he does not wish to take it, he should keep those views to himself. Not taking the booster is a bad idea if offered it.
@@mannguy
He has a right to tell people if he’s going to take a booster or not. I don’t wanna speak for him but he probably just believes his immunity is good enough to protect him without a booster. He often says you need to make up your own decision.
What is your reasoning for saying it’s a bad idea not to take the booster if I offered it?
Thank you for your response GuyMann
@@ryansuter4424The prevailing scientific opinion is that if offered the vaccines one should take them. He should not try to influencve anyone with subjective opinions or unfounded assumptions. Campbell used to provider good advice. but his advice is now very questionable. If he wishes to not take the booster that is up to him, but as an inflencerrather than a scientist hge should kjeep his personal opinions to himself.
He’s trying to ride on John Campbell’s numbers to score subs and views from his little 19.k subscribers.
@@cryptosunflower840
If that’s the case then that is a shame.
Even here in Italy there is excess mortality, sudden illnesses have increased and the government has obscured a lot of data
Excessive mortality following a pandemic. You must be the smarta** of the family!
@m2s580 you dont seem to know what excess mortality is aware of the pandemic. And the numbers are in excess of that. All cause mortality is also up. Keep googling champ.
@@bruteht4655 gonsbiracy!!11!1
@@m2s580 ^^77 Brigade BOT ALERT^^
@@m2s580 But those very same excess deaths disappeared after the ONS intervened to make them go away... nothing to hide nothing to fear right, why do you lie ^^77 Brigade BOT ALERT^^
Plot twist. Campbell's sources are correct.
lol Cambel twists the information and presents you with half the facts . He knows his audience is not smart at all so he knows he will get away with leading the sheep to the slaughter . Cambel is a dishonest clown a disgrace to our profession .
@@Sceince01 Campbell presents his sources, where are yours?
@@KT-en8pq oh really he does ? Do you think so ? Lol.
not everything is in the material / sources so it’s incumbent upon the teacher to give a bit more comprehensive picture .
He knows his audience , he knows they can not think critically as easily verifiable from the comments section under his misleading videos.
Eg have you seen his vaccine in pregnancy video ? He clearly misleads . It is negligent to NOT ADVICE covid vaccine in pregnancy given the very well documented third trimester pregnancy harms to all mother , fetus / baby . Does he mention the ton of research that clearly shows how important vaccine is in pregnancy ? In fact , he is actually tricky and shows something that even did not actually happen.
He literally fits the definition - leading the sheep to slaughter .
Do you think he does not know the literature that’s there signifying vaccine in pregnancy ? If he does not know should he even talk about vaccine in pregnancy ?
ruclips.net/video/YUBJ5pgx92I/видео.html
@@KT-en8pq
so that is one example . Another example is his video regarding mRNA vaccine incorporating into our DNA . Does he even try to give e a full picture ? No . Does he ever tell you that the liver cells used in trial are not found in humans ( they happen in an incredibly rare liver cancer ) . So does he ever say it can not actually happen in humans because we lack those enzymes .
Now how many will not vaccinate after listening to that harmful thug ? How many among his sheep used critical thinking to find that out ? So please do not tell me that this thug uses sources . He is a good example of leading the sheep to slaughter
If you actually want to educate yourself about COVID start watching TWIV or Medcram. Cambel will uneducate you .
ruclips.net/video/Ud_Egjt3vfM/видео.html
@@KT-en8pq do you want a few more videos from other scientists who initially thought Cambel was just making dumb mistakes which could harm people until they tried to correct him . So now we know that he figured out his audience is really really dumb and he can fool them any way he wants and they will never figure it out . Imagine he fooled his audience with pregnancy and vaccine update on Uk site and you can check in comment sr toon how easily did he fool his audience. He knows they are dumbest I’m the world. I mean any surprise there besides being dumb or dishonest what else can be the reason for one to be an antivaxer ?
I’m loving the comment section here:)
I see a complete disagreement to what is being said on this video. I would just shut his voice down. He will not listen to the comments and will just drone on with his lies.
Me too..! Who the hell is this Debunk the funk guy... !? 🤣🙆♂️
Me too.
@@Sonship1000 a good honest guy who is fighting the good fight , trying to educate those who can be educated against lies perpetuated by the self serving .
@@Sceince01 Can you give us just one example of one of these lies please..? 🤔
Lol the moment he disagrees with the establishment and youtube hits him with a warning, videos like this pop up.
Dear Dan please do your homework. Dan, Susan and Greg all made videos before Campbell's YT warnings. You are demonstrating the same level of understanding as he does.
This video is no different than the propaganda CNN puts out.
How can Anyone refer to Dr Malone as an anti vaxer ??
He is one of the inventors of the MRNA technology and took 2 CV19 jabs ! Fake news channel … spreading disinformation
Quick question do you understand the difference between disagreeing and fiat out lying, deceiving and misinforming his audience ?
By the way he knows his audience is not very smart and they will never figure out this deception - so congratulations
@@Sceince01 guessing you’re getting paid per reply on this thread.
@@MrAWGlossop oh you think I am a grifter like your dad ? No absolutely not .
Can you bring any intelligence to the discussion ?
No intelligence - no wonder you are an antivaxer
Dr Campbell has just released a video on the Israeli study on the cases of myocarditis and pericarditis in people had had Covid and people that had been vaccinated. He reported the outcome of that study so perhaps you should do a video to debunk the Israeli findings.
you do video. video now
where is your video
The obvious medical criminal sites an old Israeli study to fool the dumbest and misquotes it .
Do you think Campbell confidence in the dumbness of his audiences is well placed ?
ruclips.net/video/rASCfU6OXVk/видео.html
@@ripvanblues LMAOOOOO
Please don’t calm that disgrace to medical profession a doctor . He can sell his own mother for a few bucks that is how low that clown can sink.
Myocarditis is a well established adverse effect and multiple studies show that. Meta analysis has closely shown that it is8 to 16 times more common with infection. Not just one study . Never look at just one study but interestingly Israeli studies showed the world cardiac complications were way more common with Covid
Just did a search for John Campbell and your video popped up very high in the search.
Considering the paltry number of views and subscribers I must assume that it's being artificially boosted as a hit-piece.
same, how the tides turn on him. even he's getting hit now, that's how far the window/frame of acceptability is shifting. they never stop!
@@siltandsand I wonder if RUclips commissioned this video.
Either them or one of the usual suspects supporting the world economy or open society etc.
Well whatever way Dr Wilson. Video is getting boosted is good for the people to keep that thug Cambel from harming his audience who Cambel purposefully misinforms as he knows his audience is not very smart - Congratulations.
oooh check out the big brain on s0ycapitan! be careful, you lost several million neurons while typing this comment. Take some brain medicines to restore some of it back.
@@s0ycapitan good point!
I’m a physician and I disagree with your statement that Dr. Campbell has done damage. He’s creating awareness of issues that should be openly discussed, not dismissed. To question is what science is all about and he backs up his statements with studies. The real problem lies with a lack of scientific discourse about the risks and benefits of a new therapy.
I find it weird that you refer to him as "Dr." Campbell. He's not a medical doctor. He received an honorary Ph.D in 2013 just short before his retirement, from the university where his brother works. The Ph.D is for and I am not kidding, "For creating educational RUclips videos for nurses". Him pretending to be a medical doctor is very unethical.
She isn't a doctor either. A chiropractor, maybe.
so true
It’s such a sorry state that a physician like yourself is so ignorant on this subject and yet shameless enough that did not mind exposing her own short comings. If you need help learning you should watch more videos of Dr Wilson also I can help.
Please do t call Campbell a doctor as he is disgrace to medical profession . Also he is a not a doctor .
Since you are obviously uneducated in the benefits vs risks of new therapy let’s discuss
Also there are studies clearly showing that
1: blood clots are 6 times more common among the unvaccinated
2: myocarditis- 8 to 11 times more common among unvaccinated
3: myocardial infarction - multiple times more common among the unvaccinated even upto a year after unprotected COVID ( getting COVID while unvaccinated)
4: autoimmune diseases 3 times more common among unvaccinated
5: still births 2 to 3 times more common to unvaccinated mothers
6: premature births ( with plethora of life long problems and issues ) 2 to 3 times more common among unvaccinated .
7: 3rd trimester problems much higher in the unvaccinated
8: pulmonary fibrosis with unprotected COVID
9: brain damage from COVID ( shown on MRI ) before and after COVID - UK Biobank study
10: long COVID prevented by vaccine even up-to 91%
11: vaccine has shown promise in treatment of long covid
12: babies of the pregnant who received Covid vaccine in 3rd trimester ( regardless of vaccine or infection status ) were up-to 60 to 70% less likely to even catch Covid in first 6 months
So you post someone saying "no need to aspirate" yet the entire government of Germany and Sweden disagree.
Indeed.
Yup the Wikipedia is legit blocked from edits as well....... We know who the real fake news is
and not a single explanation as of WHY
@@WarIsOver-ifyouwantit The explanation is the concern that the spike protein may not lodge in the deltoid but can access the blood stream if aspiration is not performed. You won't see Governments broadcast this message as they mandated the jabs with next to zero knowledge of how an experimental population might react
@@killablooz I'm with you, I'm saying the guy on the video said it's not needed for 30 seconds and yet not a single explanation made to contradict the need to aspirate.
I have watched a lot of dr John's videos, I have seen a lot of others videos. I have all my vax's and I can see why you say what you are but... you lost me when you posted the Dr talking about peoples deaths that died from covid but also had other conditions that were Enhanced by Covid. My father died from a heart attack. His death was ruled it was covid. I fought for 3 months to get it changed as covid was not in his system. Finally got it changed and it changed my mind on conspiracies over deaths via covid. I have now had the original and omicron inflictions. You will not put another booster in me. I have several underlying health conditions that tell me to take as many boosters as possible but Im not getting stuck again. My issue is any dr that does go with the flow that if you get this you will die is outcasted. I think we need to look at all factors.
"My father died from a heart attack. His death was ruled it was covid. I fought for 3 months to get it changed as covid was not in his system."
So, you claimed to know better than the doctors.
Here's a causality chain: COVID - heart damage - heart attack - death.
@@Marco-it2mr The true causality is more likely to be the "Safe and effective" - Myocarditis - Cardiac arrest - death. And as far as you belittling someone who has just lost his father all I can say is that you are fortunate that these conversations happen on line ,you little piss ant.
@@Marco-it2mr Can you not read? He said got the diagnosis changed, so the original diagnosis was wrong? Incorrect diagnosis happens a LOT, FACT.
@@drmopgames No, having the original diagnosis changed does not necessarily mean the original diagnosis was wrong. If you are a doctor and get badgered all the time by someone, it is not that hard to ultimately just give in.
Of course, you cannot change a death certificate, so at best it has been amended, and we'll just have to believe, for some reason, that James J is correctly telling us what happened.
@@Marco-it2mr he never said his father had covid, either prior to his death or when he had the heart attack. Maybe he never had it at all? It could have been the vaccine as well, it has been known to have that side effect even if you don't want to hear it. I knew 2 people who died from 'heart attacks' within a month of taking up the second vaccine and several others who suffered health issues ranging from stroke to thrombosis and one who's death was inexplicable, all within the first four months of the rollout, apart from the sudden death, that was recent but just after she had got the booster as she was about to travel abroad.. I've never known 9 people to get sick or die in such a short period time in my 43 years of life. I know a nurse who vaccinates people all day long for the past 15 odd months and told me ambulances are there multiple times daily to take people who've reacted to the vaccine. Who knows what happened next? I don't know why anyone would defend such a vaccine..I'd only assume fear of covid consumed them. My nurse friend told me not to take the mrna vaccine and said none of the Novavax patients she's administered it to have reacted once thus far. I'm still not taking the risk. Had covid 3 months ago unvaccinated so I'm fine with natural immunity. I'd rather die fighting covid then randomly because I chose to shoot up.
I love how pretty much everyone in the comments agrees with Campbell. The irony 😂
So, you love there are so many people who have fallen in love with someone who spread lies?
Information we all need to know:
I was Army medic and studied immunology too. When you have natural protection your body produces 20-30 variant antibodies.
If you have a vaccine for the same disease it suppresses your natural immunity . And can weaken it. A vaccine is very specific and often only includes part of a pathogen. Hence why vaccinated people keep getting it over and over (no or limited variant antibodies).
For example- I was at hospital a few weeks ago. I said to the consultant that she didn't need to wear a mask as my anti body levels are 18.5 times higher than necessary immunity levels (in Portugal they give immunity levels and what your levels are).
She said, "Well I had antibodies but still got it "
I said, "Then you clearly had it asymptomatically but then got vaccinated which would have weakened your immunity. That's why you got it again"
She replied- "Yes, I suppose you are right". She knew what I was taking about.
No other diseases have they said you need a vaccine after getting it- only with this did they start this bullshit.
I love talking to doctors because, once reminded of the science, they wake up from their hypnotised state.
Even when I went to get my antibody test, a year after having it, the doctors said, "Take this to see 'IF' you have antibodies".
I quickly retorted "Doc, you know as well as I do that, if I didn't, I'd still be ill!" .
This woke him up from the hypnotism of media repetition, and he said- "Oh yes! Of course!".
The experts that know this have been kept away from us and not interviewed by MSM.
Think about it - tens of thousands of NHS doctors still hadn't been vaccinated but none were interviewed.
The only reason Dr James was is because he intercepted a live interview
70,000 doctors in the USA formed an organisation against what they saw was a scam but Google took their website down .
80,000 did the same in the EU. Again the media silenced them.
Why have we never heard why they did that - from them?
Most nurses and doctors are too scared to speak out.
Like NAZI Germany we are told not to listen to them. Like the 1940s Germans- Are we really fully informed if we only hear everything explained via the governing authority?
@@mikeedwards1096
"When you have natural protection your body produces 20-30 variant antibodies. "
And as someone who has studied immunology knows, most of those *do nothing*, and several bind too weak to do much.
"If you have a vaccine for the same disease it suppresses your natural immunity . "
Citation needed!
"Hence why vaccinated people keep getting it over and over (no or limited variant antibodies). "
I guess that explains all those people with breakthrough infection after prior infections.
"I said to the consultant "
So, you wow'ed the consultant with nonsense.
"No other diseases have they said you need a vaccine after getting it- only with this did they start this bullshit. "
Really? Is this why you get influenza vaccines *even after you have gotten it before?* (rhetorical question, the answer is "no").
And guess what works against shingles, a reactivation from a prior infection: vaccination!
Good to hear you *were* an Army medic. If you spread around this nonsense while still an Army medic, your superiors should strongly consider pushing you into a position where you can do little harm with so much pontification based on poor knowledge about vaccines.
@@mikeedwards1096 I used to wonder how so many fell for nazi propaganda. Guess we know why now.People are sheep 🐑
@@Marco-it2mr YOU are the one spreading lies!!
My personal health and the health of my family has benefited from the work of John Campbell. I am grateful to him for his work.
In which way did you and your family benefit from Campbell's work?
Perhaps your experts Dr Yan and Kellogg would like to debate John in one of his videos?
He refuses because he is telling porkies
The best thing about being a conspiracy theorist is not having myocarditis.
And a working brain....
🤡
@@TheSMR1969 anti vaxxers 🤡
Yes, definitely one of the upsides.
The mycarditis scare is such a crock. I have imaged thousands of hearts during the Pandemic and not seen 1 case from the vaccine. Did you know Myocarditis is caused by viruses?
he's one of the best in the field, that-s why he is so famous
Oh dear.... the truth triggers so many , and on 27/7 ... international ivermectin day.
Thankyou Dr John !
I think there should be a RUclips video to debunk Dr Wilson.
Try . Facts are on his side 😝
steve Tk There's probably a very good reason why there aren't many of those videos doing the rounds. Why not give it a try? Lol!
Yes please, he sounds like a complete quack…
I'm with Steve, stinks like a hit piece. I wonder if Pfizer contribute heavily to Dr Wilsons retirement fund...
@@Ricardofromage do you think every body is sold out like your dad was ?
Also do you think you were make this statement if you had a working brain to figure out what Dr Wilson actually is saying or where he is wrong ?
Aspirating for intramuscular injections is standard practice.. checking your not going to dump your load into a vein or artery. If that's changed or wrong someone let me know.
I asked my GP about this as well, and he still does it. Because despite the 'overall risk' being low, it's not zero. And while 'low' might be ok statistically, it's not nothing for the one person that actually ends up lucking out.
This is what I think MANY people seemingly forgot. Overall risks might be low, and at a population level that's OK. That doesn't mean it's zero that and it's no comfort to those that do end up lucking out, whether that's with aspiration risk, vaccine side effect risk and so on. But..apparently that doesn't really matter.
Have you watched the video rebuttal of the need to aspirate that was mentioned in the video here?
@@Cloudman572 no. Is it in the replies?
@@jjamo1225 If you press the "show more" keywords in the description that is directly below the video itself and then scroll down there is a link "5 reasons to not aspirate"
I tried to post the link itself here to help you but YT often does not allow commenters to post links.
@@Thargelios 💯
Thanks for this and can you direct me to the independent studies showing the safety and efficacy of the Pfizer/Moderna vaccinations? Obviously the Pfizer/Moderna studies will be subjective (because all studies by any organisation producing a product inevitably are) and following the science demands independent studies which are objective. Can you direct me to objective studies that verify the Moderna/Pfizer results?
How about all those population studies done in a multitude of countries? Israel was the first to do so, and had the benefit of only using one vaccine (Pfizer): 97% effectiveness against hospitalization, and 94% against asymptomatic infection - with some potential confounders not present in the RCTs, so could go a little bit in either direction.
Obviously, the word "objective" can be interpreted in many ways. I am sure some people desperately want to reject the Israeli findings and thus find a reason to call it "not objective".
@@Marco-it2mr I assume you are a scientist so you will know that retrospective studies are of little value. With so many lives at stake and potential huge windfalls of money, the least that the community could expect are proper double blind placebo studies done on potential vaccinations. I heard that was what was going to be done. Please can you direct me to the results.
@@markking4730 "so you will know that retrospective studies are of little value."
As a scientist, I try not to know something that is not true. These 'retrospective studies' (they are in reality PROSPECTIVE studies, as the analysis was determined before the study was started) have good and solid value. Yes, there are some more potential confounders, but real-life data like this is generally MORE valuable, as you have fewer restrictions on the people getting the treatment.
"I heard that was what was going to be done."
And who told you that nonsense?
@@markking4730 The placebo effect has never been shown for vaccines (it *very* much depends on the treatment), and even if it would work, it does not explain the large effect observed. It *definitely* does not explain why actual infection was observed to be so much reduced.
Regarding that placebo effect in anti-depressants, that's ONE example, and one where you have to be a bit careful about interpretation of the claims of a certain group of people vs another. Irving Kirsch is a heavy-hitter in the psychology world - and as a psychologist he cannot prescribe drugs. That gives an unconscious bias against drugs.
Regarding my "nonsense" comment, why do you think your link supports your claim? The clinical trial you refer to is sponsored by the vaccine manufacturer! Exactly what you did NOT want to see.
@@markking4730 Irving Hirsch is one of the main pushers of anti-depressants mainly working through the placebo effect. Lots and lots and lots of others put the number much lower AND there's papers that indicate the placebo effect is not nearly as large, but confounded by the infamous "regression to the mean" (see Ben Goldacre's book, Bad Science, for that).
Regardless, that placebo effect does not work for infections.
And yes, I am sure that I, an active scientist with an h-index of 40, "don't really have a good understanding of the field of science generally".
Dr. John certainly has a very loyal fan base - almost like a cult. Also, they tend to be overwhelmingly anti-covid-vax. They've certainly swarmed the comment section of this video.
yes, you can see them here.... its not about science but well feeling
🙈
Actually that's incorrect. Campbell was once pro-vax. None of us listened to him then. Trump was pro-vax, none of us listened to him either. Yet you call fans of either man cultists.
Here's when you know you're in a cult:
When the cult leader says "inject this into your body" and you do as commanded. When the cult leader says, "put this over your face and stay inside a confined space with your loved ones along with a deadly virus" and you do as commanded. When the cult leader says "if your family members catch the virus you cannot visit them in the hospital and they must die alone and afraid" and you accept it and don't hold a brutal grudge and despise that leader for the rest of your life. When your leader tells you "those with whom you disagree with are in a cult" and you go around calling everyone you disagree with a cultist on RUclips.
That's how you know you're in a cult. You're welcome.
The medical system is a mess.
It's corrupt as any drug cartel
Nurses unwilling to comply with health regulations is like enlisted soldiers enlisting to be pacifists in the heat of warfare and combat! Pacifists need to either comply with military orders to kill or they should go home to civilian life to be aesthetic monks its that simple!
Then again it's never been better.
What are you an expert in?
You can find his qualifications on the channel's "About" section.
This is the most dishonest thing I have ever encountered on RUclips. EVIL LIAR!!! . . . follow the evidence wherever it may lead . . .
John Campbell is a great man and a wealth of wisdom. I would take his "dishonest" advice over your hack "honest" advice any day of the week.
He is a man of great wealth gained by posting misleading and inaccurate videos.
It was stunning how he flipped from sensible to nuts
Ah so flipped to other side than you right? So anything that is not making your choice validated is nuts. Nice.
Yes, it's a shame. I left him for a year and came back... to find he'd flipped his lid. Money does that, I suppose. Text book case.
@@xenon2Merchant It's nuts when it's based on misrepresented evidence and outright lies, yes.
@@richardparker7157 You mean that doc flipped? What money?
@@xenon2Merchant He ran a poll on his website, asking if viewers thought COVID had evolved naturally or had been leaked from a lab. 84% went with the lab theory. At that point, Campbell realised that the bulk of his audience was conspiracy theorists and he has gone very much to a "cherry Picking" approach, only showing data that supports conspiracies, and ignoring those data which don't. His accounts from last year, at Companies House, show that he's made almost 2 million quid from this approach.
"Pander?" You use this word in connection to this man? We don't need you, we need more like him.
Jealousy at it's finest!
The bottom line is that campbell is making 30,000 dollars a mnth from idiots
At least he’s willing to change his view with up dated information…
Oh really? Where is his correction of his IVM BS?
@@Costa_Conn Patience, child, patience…😉
@@sharonmanning6824 you do realise that the jury is in on IVM? Have you read the RCTs or MAs?
@@Costa_Conn Yes, I’ve taken it. Now off you go & get a life. 🤔
@@sharonmanning6824 and you go read a book
8:33 The circular argument here is hilarious: "the overwhelming majority of these were living independent unassisted lives before covid19 killed them "; so how do we know COVID killed them? Because they were fine until COVID killed them. " They were healthy prior to contracting COVID" would be the intellectually honest way of saying it.
What's the difference?
@@janine9115
Because the sentence assumes that covid killed them which is the subject of question. You can't make the conclusion part of the premise. It would be like a prosecution asking "where were you on the night you were murdering people?" rather than "where were you on the night of the murder?"
COVID predominately kills old sick people. That’s absolutely irrefutable. Many who died with COVID would have died from something else within the next couple of years.
@@markpostgate2551 congrats, you picked up mis-statement...go to the front of the class for brilliant obfuscation.
How do you know Covid killed them? How does anyone know they died from Covid? The useless PCR test? The excess deaths only started AFTER the injections started in January 2021.
People in the comments are on that hard copium. He preaches peer review and critiques but when he gets critiqued with solid evidence he downplays, hand waives or ignores it. He's pandering to his audience for growth perhaps.
👏👏👏👏
To be fair I can't imagine why anyone would be expected to make videos in reply to videos about them.
Why should he care in the slightest about randoms opinions?
To say someone is ignoring something they don't know about is so disingenuous.
Finally a sane comment
Doctor John Campbell kicks your ass for credibility.
Ivermectin literally beat all the other antivirals in clinical trials what is this site on about?!
It didn't. Latest RCT shows even fluvoxamine does better (and still hardly does anything).
Tell us about the limitations of the ivermectin trial in Recovery...
19.5k subscribers compared to nearly 2.5 million John Campbells subscribers 🤔 I need say no more.
he's hoping to get a boost from hate watchers
@@mattg3484 I assume you mean the guy posting this video? There are haters of Campbell out there who may subscribe and boost his tiny channel more.
@@andrewnorris5415 correct
We stand with Dr John Campbell!
John Campbell is a gift to the world
"You either die a hero, or live long enough to become the villain"
Can’t believe how this quote has been so relevant for years
THANKYOU
Like joe biden
Or someone tries to cut you down to raise their own profile (like the producer of this video)
@@tonyr4873 no point trying mate, they’re set in their ways. people in this comment section think this dude is the next Isaac Newton
Which pharmaceutical company do you work for
Eurofins
Which mental hospital are you living at?
The reason I'm scared of vaxxes is because every time my Father got the FLU shot, he would get VERY sick for weeks,,,He stopped getting the FLU vax and never got sick like that again. I feel Lucky I learned this from my Dad and I use common sense and stay away from vaxxes.
Unfortunately you haven't learnt anything except to base a fear of vaccines on anecdotal evidence.
To add to your research (sample n=1) I and all my family, almost all friends, definitely all colleagues are fully vaxxed for pretty much everything and the only adverse event ( a few of us) felt was a little immunoreactivity after the second mRNA COVID vaccines. I just got a tetanus booster the other day and don't even have a sore arm. Off to vaccinate some race horses - because luck is not how we recommend animals or people deal with infectious disease these days
I know LOADS of people who have had the flu vaccines, myself inc for veing asthmatic. Zero effects of note. Weird eh
@@tomwebb7091 You won't believe any opposition anyway, so Your opinion matters not.
@@loopydoopy6823 Some of US are Super sensitive to many things, plants and foods. Don't discount us.
@@apexalpha4947 yeah, you see its very difficult to not believe actual facts youve personally bared witness too
2 bad they don't show the #s for thumbs down . . . This guy would b getting "ratioed" as they say . . .
John Campbell is a good man.
He is a greedy clout chaser.
Awww... bless!
Definitely. He goes for the truth even if it means admitting some of his initial views were not correct.
He wrote TWO medical texts he gives away, and supports 3rd world clinics.
Both sides should accept his heart is good.
@@glennshanley3343 Both sides should also accept that he has decided to embrace fringe medicine and conspiracy theories.
This video hasn't aged well considering the recent information we've received about Pfizer not testing the vaccines effectiveness at stopping transmission prior to release. Get the jab to save others...
"This video hasn't aged well considering the recent information we've received about Pfizer not testing the vaccines effectiveness at stopping transmission prior to release. "
Actually, the comment you make shows how well this video has aged, as Campbell mindlessly jumped on the misinformation bandwagon.
Did Pfizer test transmission? No, and that was never claimed by Pfizer or any health authorities. The evidence that it reduced transmission came from numerous studies afterwards. Of course, part of the "save others" was the fact that reduced healthcare burden saves people who would otherwise not have access to healthcare.
So, Derrek, do tell, why are you so gullible when you are fed such obvious misinformation by Campbell? Why do you blindly believe him, when ALL the evidence points to Campbell misrepresenting reality?
You guys still on the vax / anti-vax boat.!! Sad.
Jealously will get you NOWHERE.
We all make Mistakes but all in all he’s done amazing work for a man of his age.
John Campbell's videos always include evidence, and very often from the CDC....
Twisted information that only his audience ( not the sharpest people around ) fall for
You do realize there's more to his videos than just reciting what the study says, right? A lot of people use studies to advance opinions that aren't abstractable from the original data itself. I don't know why people have to be so insanely reductive in their need to laud others.
It's actually a sad story. I watched him at first (after SARS-CoV-2 was discovered), but then I saw worse and worse behavior. Then, he started doing the things that he complained about others doing. He was being hypocritical. I called him out, got a few agrees and attacked in general. And he said the points I and others were making were false and misleading. That was the end for me. About three years ago.... Thanks for your efforts in keeping things on track!
Same. The change was slow, but obvious. Hard to know if he made a conscious effort to reel people in with the intention of changing, if it was an unconscious change based on financial gain, or something else entirely.
I started getting attacked too, just because I said that side effects of the vaccine couldn't possibly be as bad as an actual Covid infection.
Oh dear!! You really do need to check the facts and stop listening to this tripe.
Yeah, me too. He found a band wagon and jumped on it
@cobar5342 how's your jab situation going
Who is paying you to make these false statements!?!?
I was a huge fan of Dr. Campbell at the beginning of the pandemic. But after a while the information he presented started going off the rails. And boy, his comment section is really a cesspool!
The de-evolution of John Campbell is classic audience capture. I was a viewer before his turn.
It's sad really he was a good source early on but then seems to have had a brainfart. (now this next bit is a joke OK) Probably an effect of the vaccine.
Damn, your comments are absolutely flooded with his stans. Sorry you’ve had to deal with this!
He’s not dishonest and is only exposing the truth and if you don’t like the truth it doesn’t mean he’s not wrong!
He isn't and he doesn't
You criticise Dr Campbell for going against the "scientific consensus". As I understand it, "consensus" is not a feature of the scientific method. Am I mistaken?
That's an interesting point.
No you're correct. But the politicization of science has also corrupted science. Now you will hear things like "the Climate Change debate is over" despite no debates having ever taken place.
You will also see the term "scientific consensus" used there as well. It's an easy red flag that they are attempting to hijack, misrepresent and redefine science all at the same time. It's what they do with everything. Just look at what they do with language.
Nevertheless the peer reviewed scientific studies published in Lancet or in other places have the scientific consensus.
@@elenabob4953 Ah yes, The Lancet that has been found to be less than robust of late. The Lancet, whose own editorial opined that "the state of scientific publishing today has never been more precarious" and one Robbie Fox, the great 20th century editor of the Lancet, who was no admirer of peer review, wondered whether anybody would notice if he were to swap the piles marked `publish' and `reject'. He also joked that the Lancet had a system of throwing a pile of papers down the stairs and publishing those that reached the bottom.
The first word spoken in this video, shows that lack of respect by its creator.
It's "Doctor" John Campbell.
Dr John Campbell is the only Doctor I can name, that reads daily data to the public.
And deserves praise for his work.
You know his degree is a PhD, not an MD, right? Just making sure... You could find many doctors of that sort communicating with the public at your local university. While his PhD in nursing education does qualify him to discuss many topics related to medicine, it doesn't mean he's a physician nor does it make him a researcher. For all that he does present actual real research on his channel, it's not always clear he understands it. Worse... It's quite clear his audience often doesn't understand, uses his presentation to affirm their pre-existing views, and he is either indifferent or oblivious to that fact.
I don't think it makes him an antivaxer just because he's included certain people in his videos etc, on the contrary as he's fully vaccinated himself this is a good indicator that he is not an antivaxer. His videos allow people to see how the rest of the world is dealing with the covid situation and has actually given viewer's the opportunity to share their own personal stories in the comments section. He has not discriminated between the vaccinated and unvaccinated he has given everyone the opportunity to share their own opinions and views. John has provided lots of data and has had some very knowledgeable interesting people on his videos. It doesn't surprise me at all that some people are trying to discredit him and his videos as we see this in much of today's "do not question anything" society, and I have never heard of a vaccinated antivaxer? If more data had been made public allowing transparency then perhaps some people wouldn't be so skeptical, I'd say John has given many people peace of mind and tried to provide the data that others should of.
"on the contrary as he's fully vaccinated himself this is a good indicator that he is not an antivaxer. "
Right. Just like Robert Kennedy is "not an antivaxer". It's like the racist who says he is not a racist, because he has black friends.
"If more data had been made public allowing transparency then perhaps some people wouldn't be so skeptical"
Right. What "more data" would you want to be made public? And who do you think it would convince to be less skeptical? We have LOADS of data public, and it is often weaponized - including by Campbell himself - to spread misinformation. I'll give a very obvious example of such misinformation of public data: most people who died from COVID had pre-existing conditions. This is to be expected for almost ANY infectious disease, and even more so if especially the elderly die from such a disease. After all, most elderly have some pre-existing condition. Campbell reported on this, in a very factual way, in April 2020. Almost two years later, that *same* information of most people dying of COVID having pre-existing conditions had become a HUGE revelation and a BIG story, and, according to Campbell, could mean we are overcounting COVID deaths by a factor 7, 8, or 9.
Tell me what happened between April 2020 and, ca., January 2022 that made the SAME information go from more or less as expected to a HUGE revelation and a BIG story.
An "anti-vaxer" who pushes "covid" jabs. Lol.
There us a different e between questioning things and lying about them. So is it wrong to tell a liar that he is a liar ?
He is a vaccinated antivaxer because he knows that those who love him are not very smart .
HES NOT ANTI VACS! You lost me in the first 10 seconds by saying that! Jesus!
Who is this debunk the funk guy? Dr campbell is doing a massive service. I love him.
Dr. Campbell is great. Turns out people can change their mind. Thankful for the quality info he puts out.
Oh Campbell has a lot of confidence in the inability of his dumb audience to catch his lies .
@@safeeffective385 if I do are you going to be decent enough to admit he is a crook ?
@@safeeffective385
He lied about sudden deaths and incorrectly ( purposefully attributed them to vaccine )
He lied about excess deaths and purposefully attributed to the vaccines when clearly it’s more common unvaccinated and causes are well defined .
He lied about vaccine in pregnancy and sank incredibly low ( he clearly knows how important vaccine is in pregnancy and how dangerous it is not to advise vaccine in pregnancy )
He mislead people about vaccine incorporating into DNA .
He lied and mislead about ivermectin .
He lies a lot and many very nice people like Dr Wilson have made videos about his lies
@@safeeffective385
Eg have you seen his vaccine in pregnancy video ? He clearly misleads . It is negligent to NOT ADVICE covid vaccine in pregnancy given the very well documented third trimester pregnancy harms to all mother , fetus / baby . Does he mention the ton of research that clearly shows how important vaccine is in pregnancy ? In fact , he is actually tricky and shows something that even did not even happen - an actual update in guidelines on pregnancy .
ruclips.net/video/YUBJ5pgx92I/видео.html
@@safeeffective385
Another example is his video regarding mRNA vaccine incorporating into our DNA . Does he even try to give e a full picture ? No . Does he ever tell you that the liver cells used in trial are not found in humans ( they happen in an incredibly rare liver cancer ) . So does he ever say it can not actually happen in humans because we lack those enzymes .
ruclips.net/video/Ud_Egjt3vfM/видео.html
wow clearly a bias review, even your own bias view that helped his popularity while being so silly to also point out that he's been doing this for over a decade (and thus clearly not someone just here for the anti covid rhetoric) and just a "retired nurse"(so clearly he has no paid for agenda). Who are you paid by ?
"and thus clearly not someone just here for the anti covid rhetoric"
Didn't really notice the point that he was just getting very few views on his videos...until he suddenly started promoting ivermectin?
"so clearly he has no paid for agenda"
Look up how much he is making these days with his many subscribers and views. Likely at least ten times as much as he did as a nurse.
@@Marco-it2mr, the fact that Campbell has 100s of times more subscribers than this one and other irrelevant channels, is a clear indication of the numbers of people pushing against the "official narrative". Is it lonely being in the minority now? 🤣
@@Marco-it2mr, come join us Marco. I think you'd be a good wing man 🤣🤣🤣
@@RabJ973 ..and did you just really try an Argument of Popularity on me?
@@Marco-it2mr, only the silly small undignified channels are pushing the jib jabs now. Lol..
Dr John Campbell is an honest and honourable man of integrity.
Who's making 30,000 dollars a month from idiots
Dr.John deleted my comments when I criticized his presentation. I kept posting and kept being deleted. Censorship!
He get's so many comments yet you think he saw yours and deleted it, delusional.
@@Ghost-fe1vp Not him, maybe whoever manages his RUclips channel.
Delusional or not, it's still bizarre that critical comments are deleted.
Yes he deleted a comment of mine very quickly, mind you i did say if he's right they need to put someone in jail for a few years?
Yes, he pushed everything the powers that be did. The medical industrial complex is a bad joke, but normies never learn
If you put links or words that RUclips doesn't like the comment disappears within 15s. It is extremely annoying when you want to give the source and you can't.
any comment about the phizer data dump that supports john's conclusion?
When one lies like John no data supports them. So what are you trying to deceive yourself about ?
I've seen the data dump and it doesn't support John's conclusion.
@7:00 lol no need to panic if you get a massive blood cloth 😂
Is that a bloody cloth or a piece of cloth made out of blood? I'd panic either way tbh. Not sure what it's got to do with John Campbell though.
What does 3k likes and 8k comments tell us? I spent 1h calculating and it looks like the ratio of negative to positive comments on this video is at 8 to 1 respectively. So it is fair to assume that 3k likes multiplied by 8 would give this video 24k dislikes. The dodgy website claiming Dr JC fortune number topped it up. Dr Wilson, Dr Wilson... Smelling a bit badly here...
I’m sure an audience that is looking to discredit anyone going against the covid narrative would appreciate this channel. As for me, I’ll think for myself. I’m sorry I listened to this and contribute to the profits from this channel.
"Thinking for myself" translates to: "blindly believing baseless conspiracy theories which other people came up with that I read on Facebook without question while denying scientific facts that are actually supported by evidence". Yeah the epitome of "thinking for yourself" right there everyone!
Same
@@tessaPMprofollow the $
Perhaps debunk or fact check the article you drop in saying he now earns over $4m a year from his rise in popularity
You speak a lot of the science, would this be the same science that told us the vaccine was both safe an effective? Of course it became quickly clear it's effectiveness is minimal at best. I pray or us all, it's safety doesn't turn out to be as minimal as it's effectiveness.
With 'unknown cause' being the biggest cause of death in 2021/22, followed by heart and stroke, I'd say that too is obvious.
@@floydoffancy lol why did you have to lie ?
Yes it has been proven vaccines are safe and effective specially when consider with risking the infection without protection for any given individual .
Are there still nut jobs who do not understand this bodes pure a ton of data ?
I'm not sure I have ever heard of a drug or vaccine that is 100% effective. I hope you understand that no vaccine is 100% effective in stopping infection, in fact most reduce infection, thus one doesn't develop full-blown disease. Vaccines attenuate disease and infection, they don't eliminate it (except for smallpox), they never have, but they are still effective.
@@Costa_Conn well actually the only way an infection has been eradicated is via vaccines . We only have a few examples of that . Polio would have been eradicated if not for some antivaxer’s in Afghanistan and Pakistan . One of cattle diseases has been eradicated as well .
This is not a function of vaccine but it’s the characteristics of a virus that determine if it will be eradicated . For example the viruses that have a phase in blood our body tends to respond better with our immunity .
Our immunity is the same wether we get it from virus or vaccine. So the second important factor is how our body naturally response to the virus. It does not have anything to do with vaccine
Looking at the comments I can see there are people here who give him a pass and people who have gone part ways down the rabbit hole. I would say one thing, if people know that he does that and are okay with it, should they do something he suggests and it ends up costing them their lives, so be it. To damn bad. He really very dishonest and GREEDY. An old man like him becoming greedy at his age. I thought he would have been over that GREED thing by now.
People just listen to the 'experts' and watch the news for instructions on what to say next
You know what is missing in this video? All the links to the studies that prove your points and that you mention several times. The same which are present, instead, in each and every video from Dr. Campbell.
Stopped watching Campbell's videos about a year ago. Yep, following the science doesn't bring in the $$ as twisting the science. Makes me sad. I used to really like listening to him.
If you actually examined the pharma studies on their products you would be anti-vaccine and anti-pharma. They lie. And they kill when their products don't just make people less well.
Lmfaooo, how many shots do you have?
How is he not following the Science when he's using peer reviewed studies from government agencies and reliable non profits like WHO and CDC even NGOs with links to go view them for yourself?
@@KarlaBedministerHe doesn't use "the right" science. No wonder OP followed John while he was presenting only official WHO policy.
So, successful treatment of covid using ivermectin in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh is not true?
that's correct, and part of the reason why it's no longer used in India
As NFD notes, it is indeed untrue that the treatment was successful. Of course the local government still tries to sell it as having been effective, but the people of UP know better. They've seen how many of their family, friends, and locals have died.
Evidence?
Yup not true .
Correct. It is not true. How all that misinformation came about though does make for a very interesting study.
Do you still work at Eurofins? The company that provides support for the covid vaccines?
You're not exactly a neutral party yourself, now are you?
An attack on John Campbell is an attack on openness.
Sounds like your trying to steal the doctors subs, quite slow your channel growth I wonder why
John Campbell's supporters really out here in the comment section in full force. funny because he told yall to just ignore his critics, yet here you are.
Based on their grammar and disconnect from comments they're replying to, I wouldn't bet against them being bots. RUclips comments is like Twitter (post-Elon) in terms of moderation.
They are attacking him because he speaks the truth
What an utter DISAPPOINTMENT Campbell has become and no wonder his RUclips channel has received warnings for misinformation. Thank you for this video as I believe your second assertion re a huge increase in revenue has him 'changing his audience'.
Hmmm, okay..... perhaps the most helpful thing you could do is go and debunk yourself - all you've succeeded in doing here is highlighted your obvious non genuine agenda in great, big, flashing neon lights. Now pop along there with your ill-gotten funds, there's a good chap.
I suggest you watch the other YTubers, linked in the description. They all follow the science, not the scientist.
John Cambel misinforms purposefully to get clicks from a certain crowd . He does it purposefully as he understands how dumb his audience is . Congratulations
Check out other scientists who have proven exactly how he is ? Purposefully) misinforming his dumb audience 😀
I love the way that most comments below dismiss this video without addressing the facts it meticulously lays out.
Thank you Dr. Wilson for actually debating the facts and exposing the Campbellcrap.
Data is data
Facts are facts
Thank you Dr Campbell
And believe it or not, especially in the world of health, there is often so much CONFLICTING DATA . And consequently a lot of cherry picking…..
Debunk? :D:D I can only laugh loudly on someone who is talking about "antivaxers" in 2022.
Yup the benefits of vaccine vs risking infection unprotected are so crystal clear that no body should have to discuss that . Anyway you know there are a lot of nuts out there .
@@Sceince01 The fact that you call mrna therapy as "vaccine" shows crystal clearly you know nothing about natural immunity and mrna technology. That's why this topic should be discussed much frequently.
@@emberarc fayyaz thinks he knows everything. He replied to my comment but said he was not replying to me lol
This video is nothing more but a hit job !
I think that's what Einstein said about Schrodinger's cat dying
And fully deserved for the misinformer John Campbell.
Campbell will probably be hit with law suits next paid for by multi billion $$$ doners. Independent science is not allowed.
"Clout chasing' as they say in the states too.
Yes yes, it's healthy to double check ✔️ many are now wishing they had
Actually the data confirms that the mRNA vaccine were even better than we initially thought I agree some who are unable to think keep falling for criminals like Campbell’s lies
Sadly, it's too late for the unvaxxed dead 🤷🏻♂️
@@spinalcrackerbox😂😂😂😂
Unvaxxed and very much alive!!
@@spinalcrackerbox
Campbell has had people on his show that got messed up by the jabs, are you gona debunk them too
Do you think those clowns are just as pathetic liars as Campbell of worse ? Do you have any doubt that clown lies a lot ? Also please don’t call him a Dr , he is a disgrace to medical profession
Glad to see more people in the comments supporting Dr Campbell than your video.
Wow how much did they pay you to do this one? Dont veer too far away from "the science"(aka what pharmaceutical ads say). John Campbell provides the data and leaves a fair and unbiased perspective. Funny that your video here comes around the same time that the Thai report for adolescent vaccinations came out and he started digging into excess death rates internationally.......
This guy is a joke. He is jealous because John Campbell actually shows proof and cares about people..This guy is mad he doesn't have more subscribers.
Anyone who is telling the truth is being vilified, so you have just confirmed his honesty in analyzing the data. Thanks for the confirmation.
Big pharma lap dog's here are hilarious 😂😂😂😂 keep getting your "safe and effective" doses sheep 😂😂😂
Seriously? What people won't do for click bait.
So all the other actual scientists who have made vids refuting Campbell are also looking for clickbait? GFOH
I watched him for a while but soon started to feel that he was drawing inferences from papers and data that weren’t really there.
this video is really cute.
enjoy your boosters.
given the move to no longer authorize vaccines for under 50s in the UK, isn't it about time to retract the unfounded attacks on campbell for arguing for a more risk assessed version of vaccine policy.
Interesting that your video channel is monetized, whereas John Campbell's is not - despite him having 3.6 million subscribers - he could make a heck of a lot of money if he chose to. That tells me a lot about his integrity and your (lack of) integrity.
>>I rarely read RUclips comments these days ....
Yeah, sure you did. 😉
I smell BS
@@user-fy9fr3bc7v You do? Well, good for you!
I used to follow Campbell regularly. He lost me with his review of the ivermectin studies, and what I deemed, his drift to conspiracy theories.
Lol, you mean "As long as Dr Campbell was willing to tell me everything my political bias wants to hear he was A-ok in my book, but then he started looking at all those pesky facts which big brother has taught me to call 'conspiracy theories' & I held on tightly to my seat so I wouldn't fall out of the "safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective" automaton bandwagon I call home.
@@sheilacabrera3986 Campbell consistently misrepresents studies/data ruclips.net/p/PLV1WqH0isjRxTQUVyeZHBt-V35YeAknnW.
@@sheilacabrera3986ok Sheila. Paranoid ignorance is kicking in.
As you can see from the comment section, trying to discredit someone like Dr Campbell, even though it can help you generate a hundred bucks worth of views (which seems to be your primary objective), might cause people to start doubting you, your motives, and your own credibility, especially if you don't offer a solid proof to back up your claims.
What I can see from the comment section a concerted attempt from the pro Campbell's team of cronies to diss Dr Dan's robust corrections of Campbell's misleading videos. It was by seeing Campbell's blatant screwing up of science papers that led me to Debunk the Funk in the first place. I did have a Science heavy education so could tell who was presenting the truth, and it is not Campbell. Also the people he has attached himself to are a collection of clowns in the extreme. Not one with any integrity.
Since you have brought money into it, the one who has noticeably gained wealth from his videos is indeed Campbell. A hundred bucks is nothing compared to the sums Campbell has accrued, all noted on publicly accessible Companies House. Going from his useful and worthy teaching videos into anti vax mode coincided with huge boost of income.