@@OxfordCommaEducation I am the one who should thank you for this free effort! That should be payed! You saved too much time for me! Keep like that I will always watch your videos and like them because they really worth. By the way, this is the first video that i watched from you today. Good luck.
Thanks this really helped me helped me in my linguistics homework about why linguist should think about language descriptively, rather than prescriptively
Wow this video helped me a lot. I am a spanish speaker and I'm still learning english, I have to do my homework but I did not understand the PDF that my teacher sent me. Thanks
I think prescriptivism descriptivism argument is silly. Because neither represents the actual reality. If you check a language through a long period of time, the language is, like a species, always evolving. Non constant. But if you check a language or a species in an instance or a very small time frame, it is constant or almost constant. The change is miniscule. Even if you think broad and say language is despriptivistic to determine the current state of the language, you have to stop and measure how the majority using it in a particular region or worldiwide. If you don't do that you will never be able to have set rules of the language. And the ability to communicate in that language will be passed quite inaccurately from generation to generation. Therefore, we should look at the language prescriptivisticly and record the current state. It is an error minimizing checkpoint of language. However, change is uncontrollable and the majority of the people will decide if the trend to use the language in a certain way will last or not. If it hinders the language or obsolete, it will probably die out in time. But if it is useful it will last. And as we snapshot the rules at the different timepoints. Whenever the next time we re-assess the rules we will record the changes. Also we can know and record how widely some things are used and in which groups etc. If we see the language only descriptivisticly it isn't possible to pass the skill easily and it is impossible to keep track of every slightly different way each and every person uses the language. Therefore, if each and every way is seen equal, the language gets ineffective in communicating. Bıkoz ez a pörsn I cn feock dı lenguç end dere izınt e wey to hayerarkikıli rank it lowır then enodır yuz. (Because as a person I can fuck the language and there isn't a way to hierarchically rank it lower then another use.
Hi! Thank you so much for pointing this out. I'm not sure why, but this one video seems to have this issue every once and while. Usually, it works fine, but every couple of months this seems to happen. So sorry for the inconvenience! I wish I could fix it!
Thanks! A paradigm shift is a different way of looking at things. So in this video, it's referring to a large group looking at linguistics in a different way.
I am very torn apart when I apply this concept in a country with almost 130 languages. Colonial history really messed up the development of our languages that, as of now, we have trouble explaining scientific, technological, and even important progressive ideas to the masses. We use a foreign (but official) language but many experiments and demonstrations have discredited its effectiveness in facilitating education. It could have downplayed the importance of a reading culture, which the lower classes need the most, because majority of the books are printed in the foreign language. I guess we have to strike the best combination of descriptive and prescriptive strategies because in a country with many languages, we have to strive not becoming language imperialists.
That must be such a difficult situation to navigate! Language is definitely not brought up enough when people discuss the ramifications of imperialism and globalization. Thank you for sharing your insight!
@@fatalinstinct1987 Yeah, I'd be up for making a video about anything English education related. What exactly do you mean by feedback? Like editing strategies?
Thanks! I think that's a great idea. I'll try to have some videos up in the next few weeks. In the meantime, just be sure to give your paper an out loud reading. Most people catch more of their mistakes that way.
Hi, I'm writing an essay and this video was really helpful. Could you please tell me your name so I can put this video in my bibliography? Thank you, great video
Yeah prescriptive is when you try eagerly set down rules. Actually, saying what must happen, especial by giving instructions. For those who's got a naivety in their blood it might be difficult to hit home
Here are some things a prescriptive grammarian would take issue with: Ending a sentence in a preposition, split infinitives, starting a sentence with And or But, using Lesser and Fewer interchangeably. A descriptive grammarian would be fine with all of those. Hope that helps! There's also some great examples in the book listed in the description if you want to go further with this.
Unfortunately I'm not familiar with that book. I had a different linguistics textbook in college...But if you have any conceptual questions, I'll do my best to answer them!
No no Descriptive grammar is always correct The grammarian has mistakes when they said (use_ he or she- Dont use they) And all of the ancient books says that the native spear says(they) And the preposition at the end is correct Ex Who will you go with? It is correct It is british grammarian's fault You can see mant mistakes on cambridge.com So Cambridge is the english of one old city Not all of the english So The comparative grammar based on one city Not all english That means The comparative grammar is wrong And still students in schools study it
We have to submit an essay tomorrow about Descriptive and Prescriptive and this video is a great help. Thank you!
I'm so glad to hear that it helped! Best of luck with your essay!
A Moroccan English Student Comment:
Short and really helpful! That's what exactly students are looking for! Thanks.
Glad to hear that! Thank you so much for watching!
@@OxfordCommaEducation I am the one who should thank you for this free effort! That should be payed! You saved too much time for me! Keep like that I will always watch your videos and like them because they really worth. By the way, this is the first video that i watched from you today. Good luck.
@@yourway382 That is so kind. Thank you so much for the support!
Thanks this really helped me helped me in my linguistics homework about why linguist should think about language descriptively, rather than prescriptively
So glad you found it useful!
After a week, finally found a video that explain it really well.
Thank you so much for this comment. I'm glad the video was helpful.
This really helped with my linguistics test I'm currently taking!
Glad to hear it! Hope your test went well!
You really helped me with my understanding of descriptive linguistics! Thank you.
I'm so glad to hear that!
Wow this video helped me a lot.
I am a spanish speaker and I'm still learning english, I have to do my homework but I did not understand the PDF that my teacher sent me.
Thanks
So glad it helped! Best of luck with your studies!
This video is a great help. I have an essay to submit next week about prescriptiveness. Thank you so much Sir !
Thank you so much for the kind feedback! Best of luck on your essay!
Thank you from India... it's really helpful🙏
Glad it was helpful!
I was wondering if i should click this vid...I decided to click it because...you know....yolo
I commend your boldness.
Great job 😊
Thank you!
This is the simplest way to understand, thank you
You're welcome. Thank you for the kind words.
This video helped me a lot
Thanx so much ♥️♥️
I'm so glad! Thank you for the kind feedback.
thank you, this video is really easy to understand. hope you still make another video 💛💛💛
Thank you for the comment! I hope to have another video out soon!
thanks! needed it for my linguistics class :)
Glad it was helpful! Best of luck with your class!
Thanks for your help man!
You're very welcome!
I think prescriptivism descriptivism argument is silly. Because neither represents the actual reality. If you check a language through a long period of time, the language is, like a species, always evolving. Non constant. But if you check a language or a species in an instance or a very small time frame, it is constant or almost constant. The change is miniscule.
Even if you think broad and say language is despriptivistic to determine the current state of the language, you have to stop and measure how the majority using it in a particular region or worldiwide. If you don't do that you will never be able to have set rules of the language. And the ability to communicate in that language will be passed quite inaccurately from generation to generation. Therefore, we should look at the language prescriptivisticly and record the current state. It is an error minimizing checkpoint of language. However, change is uncontrollable and the majority of the people will decide if the trend to use the language in a certain way will last or not. If it hinders the language or obsolete, it will probably die out in time. But if it is useful it will last. And as we snapshot the rules at the different timepoints. Whenever the next time we re-assess the rules we will record the changes. Also we can know and record how widely some things are used and in which groups etc.
If we see the language only descriptivisticly it isn't possible to pass the skill easily and it is impossible to keep track of every slightly different way each and every person uses the language. Therefore, if each and every way is seen equal, the language gets ineffective in communicating.
Bıkoz ez a pörsn I cn feock dı lenguç end dere izınt e wey to hayerarkikıli rank it lowır then enodır yuz.
(Because as a person I can fuck the language and there isn't a way to hierarchically rank it lower then another use.
Abbas Güven Akçay Underratted comment. Fucking leftie agenda
you're describing descriptive linguistics lol
Finally a video that as helped me with my studies .
I'm so glad to hear that it helped! Thanks for watching and good luck with your studies!
Thank you !!!! This was very helpful!!!
You're welcome! Thank you for watching!
clear explanation, thanks.
You're welcome! Thank you for the kind comment.
Nice thank you very much
You're very welcome. Thank you for watching!
Great one...❤
Thank you so much!
Great help
hi why the audio comes earlier before the video itself is it just me or y'all having the same issue
Hi! Thank you so much for pointing this out. I'm not sure why, but this one video seems to have this issue every once and while. Usually, it works fine, but every couple of months this seems to happen.
So sorry for the inconvenience! I wish I could fix it!
really helpful, thank you !
You're welcome!
Great video!
What does "paradigm shift" imply in linguistics?
Thanks!
A paradigm shift is a different way of looking at things. So in this video, it's referring to a large group looking at linguistics in a different way.
Thank you sir.
Most welcome!
Thank you so much♡
your video helped me a lot!
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
I'm so glad it was helpful! Thank you for the kind comment!
Thanks dude. Your video helped me. And after watching it i hit that subscribe button very happily.
Thank you so much! I hope to keep bringing you useful content.
It's 2 in the morning...i have an exam today 😭😭😭thanks for saving my life and my exam
So glad I could help! Best of luck on your exam, you got this!
This was so good 💕
Thank you so much!
Dialekts still have their defined rules within a short time period.
Thanks !
You're welcome!
I am very torn apart when I apply this concept in a country with almost 130 languages. Colonial history really messed up the development of our languages that, as of now, we have trouble explaining scientific, technological, and even important progressive ideas to the masses. We use a foreign (but official) language but many experiments and demonstrations have discredited its effectiveness in facilitating education. It could have downplayed the importance of a reading culture, which the lower classes need the most, because majority of the books are printed in the foreign language. I guess we have to strike the best combination of descriptive and prescriptive strategies because in a country with many languages, we have to strive not becoming language imperialists.
That must be such a difficult situation to navigate! Language is definitely not brought up enough when people discuss the ramifications of imperialism and globalization.
Thank you for sharing your insight!
thanks dude! you helped me writing my essay
Anytime! Thanks for watching and good luck with your writing!
Oxford Comma maybe you can help me with other stuff like giving feedbacks
@@fatalinstinct1987 Yeah, I'd be up for making a video about anything English education related. What exactly do you mean by feedback? Like editing strategies?
Oxford Comma English education related videos would be very useful, especially editing strategies are what I need most and good luck with your videos!
Thanks! I think that's a great idea. I'll try to have some videos up in the next few weeks. In the meantime, just be sure to give your paper an out loud reading. Most people catch more of their mistakes that way.
Hi, I'm writing an essay and this video was really helpful. Could you please tell me your name so I can put this video in my bibliography? Thank you, great video
Sure thing: E.J. McBee
Yeah prescriptive is when you try eagerly set down rules. Actually, saying what must happen, especial by giving instructions.
For those who's got a naivety in their blood it might be difficult to hit home
I would like you to define curriculum
Great question. Curriculum is the works, lessons, and assessments that go into a class. Basically what a teachers teaches.
Thanks 😊
You're welcome! Thanks for checking it out.
“Snap shot”… lol
Keep up yhe good work
there is some part that doesn't have sounds😥
Thank you so much for pointing this out. I don't know what's happening now but the audio used to work. I'll see if I can upload a corrected version.
Please make more videos
Hopefully one coming out this weekend. Thanks for the encouragement!
Prescriptive. Is it negative or positive?
Depends who you ask. I would say that, currently, the prescriptive approach is seen as more of a negative than positive in modern education.
@@OxfordCommaEducation Omay. Thank you so much Sir. Great Video!
@@roar5526 In what our professor said. Misinterpretation occur with descriptive language.
@@roar5526It can't. Because prescriptive adapt. And has no strict rules when it comes to format.
@@roar5526 eh? I have no idea. I'm just a student. Haha
Greate video❤ but please I need someone to help me and give me more examples about both. Prescriptive and descriptive linguistic 🤗
Thank you so much! Anything specific that's still confusing?
@@OxfordCommaEducation I just need more examples about descriptive linguistic and prescriptive linguistic.
Here are some things a prescriptive grammarian would take issue with:
Ending a sentence in a preposition, split infinitives, starting a sentence with And or But, using Lesser and Fewer interchangeably.
A descriptive grammarian would be fine with all of those.
Hope that helps!
There's also some great examples in the book listed in the description if you want to go further with this.
Hi can you talk about norbert schmitt book
Unfortunately I'm not familiar with that book. I had a different linguistics textbook in college...But if you have any conceptual questions, I'll do my best to answer them!
Is there a name for your position on the issue?
Good question. I guess linguistic moderate... Most people are so entrenched in one camp or the other that I've never heard a hybrid position defined.
thank you !
Of course! Thanks for watching!
You are so cute .... I think I shouldn't say this...but u are....
Thanks
You're welcome! Thanks for watching and best wishes on your studies!
This guy stored sea in a pot👍👍
I love you,
Haha, thank you very much :)
if it's a formal setting, then Standard English all the way. If it's colloquial, then say what the f one wishes.
No no
Descriptive grammar is always correct
The grammarian has mistakes when they said (use_ he or she- Dont use they)
And all of the ancient books says that the native spear says(they)
And the preposition at the end is correct
Ex
Who will you go with?
It is correct
It is british grammarian's fault
You can see mant mistakes on cambridge.com
So
Cambridge is the english of one old city
Not all of the english
So
The comparative grammar based on one city
Not all english
That means
The comparative grammar is wrong
And still students in schools study it
So basically, it is a matter of either being a Grammar N*zi or a Grammar C*mmunist.