For 3 airtable business users (admin+2 + AI), the total cost would be 156$/mo. While 1 biz user/admin (45$) + ai = 52$/mo + 3 team users (+75$) without AI Total: 127$ Is it worth to consider the 2nd option 2way syncing master biz plan tables to a teams plan workspace with lower cost users? Or the additional complexity would involve additional human work while reducing reliability?
Reliability vs. Cost: If reliability is critical, the first option might be better despite the higher cost, as it eliminates the risk of sync issues. Workload Impact: If you have the resources to manage and monitor the syncs without impacting your team’s efficiency, the second option could be a viable cost-saving measure. Feature Requirements: Consider whether the team users truly need all the features of the business plan. If their tasks are simple and don’t require advanced capabilities, the second option might make sense. If your workflow is heavily dependent on the reliability and full functionality of Airtable’s business plan, and you want to minimize potential issues or additional human work, the first option is likely the better choice. However, if your team can manage with fewer features and you have a robust process for handling syncs, the second option could save costs effectively. Evaluate whether the potential savings justify the added complexity and whether your team can manage any potential issues that arise from syncing workspaces.
So useful, I am from a city called PUEBLA in Mexico
For 3 airtable business users (admin+2 + AI), the total cost would be 156$/mo.
While
1 biz user/admin (45$) + ai = 52$/mo
+ 3 team users (+75$) without AI
Total: 127$
Is it worth to consider the 2nd option 2way syncing master biz plan tables to a teams plan workspace with lower cost users? Or the additional complexity would involve additional human work while reducing reliability?
Reliability vs. Cost: If reliability is critical, the first option might be better despite the higher cost, as it eliminates the risk of sync issues.
Workload Impact: If you have the resources to manage and monitor the syncs without impacting your team’s efficiency, the second option could be a viable cost-saving measure.
Feature Requirements: Consider whether the team users truly need all the features of the business plan. If their tasks are simple and don’t require advanced capabilities, the second option might make sense.
If your workflow is heavily dependent on the reliability and full functionality of Airtable’s business plan, and you want to minimize potential issues or additional human work, the first option is likely the better choice. However, if your team can manage with fewer features and you have a robust process for handling syncs, the second option could save costs effectively.
Evaluate whether the potential savings justify the added complexity and whether your team can manage any potential issues that arise from syncing workspaces.