Flying Reverse Hook vs Flying Reverse Turning in Juche | Tul World Podcast

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 окт 2024
  • Flying Reverse Hook vs. Flying Reverse Turning in Juche
    Check out our new Tul World website @ tulworld.com
    Tul World+ is an ever growing online platform designed to supplement your Taekwon-Do training with video explanations and references to the Encyclopedia. Support Tul World @ tulworld.com/i...
    Join the Tul World mailing list to receive exclusive deals and news: eepurl.com/hWFOs1
    Scheduled a free in-person Taekwon-Do trial class at www.juestkd.co...
    Add us on Instagram: / juestaekwondo

Комментарии • 4

  • @1mgorsha
    @1mgorsha 7 месяцев назад

    I think it would be up to the technical committee as far as the pattern is concerned, but could or should individual tournament committees provide guidance as pertains to acceptability?

    • @JuesTaekwonDo
      @JuesTaekwonDo 7 месяцев назад +1

      Yes sir, that’s not a bad idea if we know competitors seems to do it differently. But that’s the point what is correct? We have to have a standard to make those decisions as an umpire. Another example what if a competitor does a fore-fist punch and the other does a side fore-fist front punch? Is that correct?
      Grand Master Wheatley talks about this idea in his seminars. He usually uses the example of crescent punch, angle punch and turning punch. They all look similar but they are different. Depending on pattern will you know which is correct. So really there is only one correct way.

    • @1mgorsha
      @1mgorsha 7 месяцев назад

      @@JuesTaekwonDo
      Far be it from me as a fifth degree to presume to be an authority, but I would assume that what is provided on the ITF-administration website is ‘correct’. What is deemed to be ‘acceptable’ for tournaments or by an instructor would seem to be a separate discussion. Strictly my subjective and admittedly rather limited view of the subject, Sir.

  • @crreginald5943
    @crreginald5943 5 месяцев назад

    Promo>SM 😥