Flexure Formula (Part 2) - Mechanics of Materials

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 фев 2025

Комментарии • 104

  • @raveenekanayake9494
    @raveenekanayake9494 8 лет назад +42

    3 hour lecture in 30 minutes and 1000 times better!!!!! XD seriously im starting to love a subject i hated! THANK YOU!

    • @MrRaymond10
      @MrRaymond10 7 лет назад +1

      less than 30 min if u speed up B)

  • @TimothyMoananu
    @TimothyMoananu 10 лет назад +17

    You've simply encouraged me to continue with engineering with the fun that you had explaining this haha. Thank you so much and God bless

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  10 лет назад +23

      Thank you for the kind words. I believe. Let me know when you graduate!
      "You need to crawl before you can ball." - K. West

    • @rohanjain1997
      @rohanjain1997 5 лет назад +1

      @@structurefree I'm guessing he probably graduating soon or has already!

  • @pellepeloton7627
    @pellepeloton7627 6 лет назад +4

    oh my.. this was amazing. I specially liked how you opened up the second moment of area. Most of the books just tell you its Iz=int y^2 Da and then some shallow explanation and how you actually calculate it. Thank you so much! I linked this channel to my fellow engineering students.

  • @IAmKuwerican
    @IAmKuwerican 8 лет назад +1

    Thank you much you saved my life. You have explained it better than my instructor waaaaaaaaaay better!

  • @anamajhol
    @anamajhol 7 лет назад +1

    I'm glad I found this channel . Thank you sooo much!

  • @simonblue56
    @simonblue56 5 лет назад +1

    Wow, I really enjoy the videos. You know what, I am so excited that I do not want to go to bed. Wonderful explanations worth great appreciation !

  • @hamzairfan2117
    @hamzairfan2117 5 лет назад +1

    He explained it so well and in such an amusing way. I really enjoyed learning the flexure formula.

  • @almerovanrooyen4463
    @almerovanrooyen4463 7 лет назад +1

    YOU ARE A LEGEND!! I WON'T EVER ATTEND MY CLASSES AGAIN.

  • @structurefree
    @structurefree  12 лет назад +1

    the negative strain denotes the compression side of the beam. I chose to say that negative strain is to the right and positive strain is to the left in order to match the deformed shape. Instead of arrows, it might be better to just think of strain values at each point along the section of the beam.

  • @AnkitKumar-si3zx
    @AnkitKumar-si3zx 6 лет назад

    You deserve a gold medal🏅 in teaching!

  • @shylildude
    @shylildude 10 лет назад +2

    i like your attitude and the way you explain it is top notch also your neatness helps thanks for all that you do man

  • @zubairilyasmuhammadilyas7767
    @zubairilyasmuhammadilyas7767 5 лет назад +1

    Love for your simple explanations Allah will give you more success .🎓

  • @AGhawanmeh
    @AGhawanmeh 11 лет назад +1

    This is just PERFECT !
    You have a great way to do it . Keep it up :D

  • @elc355
    @elc355 8 лет назад +1

    Damn , unstucking feels so good . Really like it!

  • @_sica
    @_sica 6 лет назад

    I have just come out of a 2 our lecture with no clue what was going on. Even with this sped up to 1.5x I have learned more here.. Thanks :)

  • @rodri11
    @rodri11 7 лет назад

    Thank you very much , I'm taking this class in Germany and woow you just made it so easy to understand

  • @mahboobehrezaei1516
    @mahboobehrezaei1516 7 лет назад

    Thank you very much. I'm having my last bachelor's degree exam tomorrow and these videos of yours are being super helpful. (If I may, you say BAM way too much! I would save it for the final formula only)

  • @TheJagclash11
    @TheJagclash11 6 лет назад

    ..your lecture truly the bring understanding of the foundation

  • @hariston9
    @hariston9 11 лет назад +1

    keep it up and thanks my carrer will surely will get a boost with these

  • @akarshsonni2829
    @akarshsonni2829 8 лет назад +9

    Thank you so much man! This was really helpful! :D

  • @yunusemre-jx9ju
    @yunusemre-jx9ju 7 лет назад

    Thanks lecture , greetings from Turkey . Very good expression

  • @FelixyzTv
    @FelixyzTv 12 лет назад

    still watching in 2013. keep on going !

  • @frt2406
    @frt2406 7 лет назад

    Pirate Hooke.. You are great man :)

  • @structurefree
    @structurefree  12 лет назад

    thanks for watching!

  • @harshaunknown
    @harshaunknown 9 лет назад +1

    Thank you very much, Clearly Explained....

  • @NeodudeQuake
    @NeodudeQuake 10 лет назад +3

    You are a super hero.

  • @asadnaushad3962
    @asadnaushad3962 11 лет назад +1

    thanks !!!
    this video did help me understand. Great job :)

  • @nimeshinimeshi
    @nimeshinimeshi 10 лет назад +1

    sir u are a life saver :) thank u so very much... that selfish equation thing is awesome (Y)

  • @kimleyson1471
    @kimleyson1471 9 лет назад

    hello, i would just like to ask why did the strain(max) was changed into stress(max) during the derivation of normal stress by substituting it in hooke's law in 4:17 of your vid. i'm confused. please help me.

  • @thomasoreilly4284
    @thomasoreilly4284 4 года назад

    At 4:25 where does the σmax/E come from? I see how you can go from σ=Ε*Σ to σ/Ε=Σ and it was already stated Σ=(-y/c)*Σmax but I don't know(can't see how) the Σmax= σmax/E.

  • @michaelnibret9446
    @michaelnibret9446 5 лет назад +1

    very attractive explanation about selfishness formula ' stress = -my/i '

  • @g870601
    @g870601 12 лет назад

    this is really awesome!!! love this video ~! save my day!! exam in2 days ~ this really really really helped :D

  • @lukmanali6426
    @lukmanali6426 9 лет назад +1

    9:38 not sure if this is a stupid question. does that mean the magnitude of the stress above the neutral plane is equal to the stress below the neutral plane. and at 7:04 in my head it seems like it should be Mz = T*Arm +C*Arm?

  • @shafiraanindita3087
    @shafiraanindita3087 11 лет назад +1

    Thanks alot. Saves alot of time. do you have any example problem?

  • @flatboat70452
    @flatboat70452 11 лет назад +2

    I never heard it described as the selfish formula (of course i always did Mc/I). and Ayn Rand reference was hilarious! Of course i was also selfishly disappointed because i searched for Residual Stresses in... Even if you part went plastic, we still say plane sections remain plane.

  • @19-hammadnasir35
    @19-hammadnasir35 2 года назад +1

    thank you so much sir!

  • @rozanashahid6603
    @rozanashahid6603 9 лет назад +2

    thank you very much .. that explained a lot of stuck things .. keep going (Y)

  • @arupkuet
    @arupkuet 7 лет назад +1

    Awesome teaching capablity

  • @vishnusuhaas8682
    @vishnusuhaas8682 8 лет назад

    at 5:22 why is the direction of stress towards the cross section?

  • @anesmerazi603
    @anesmerazi603 7 лет назад

    why are the stress vectors not in the same direction as the strain ?

  • @ebidash
    @ebidash 11 лет назад +1

    Perfect !!thank you very much

  • @bullhornn
    @bullhornn 11 лет назад

    Do you have a video that translates all of this into real-world implications, like wood and steel structure design or conceptual language. I'm thinking of something that discusses the material without using variables as a language? Rather than saying "Sigma is equal to E times Epsilon... Sigma divided by E... equal to minus y divided by c..." To some that sounds like a sentence, to others (myself) it sounds like a foreign language that I need translated without going to a huge variable glossary.

  • @fatimadyczynski
    @fatimadyczynski 12 лет назад

    very good video

  • @5atoru
    @5atoru 11 лет назад +1

    i cracked up when you described that formula as selfish :))

  • @shielaumali145
    @shielaumali145 7 лет назад

    big help dude tysm!!! ❤

  • @erasmusbessie
    @erasmusbessie 4 года назад +1

    Can you do another video about the flexural strength formula as mention in ASTM C78 (concrete beam) because that's the reason why I came to this video.
    It says, Flexural Strength = (PxL) / bd³
    Where, P is max pressure that works on beam till it fails, L: length of beam, b= base, d= depth.
    So PxL is Moment right?
    And what is bd³? Isn't it supposed to be Inertia (Ix) , which is 1/12 bd³?=M/Ix
    Why there's no 1/12 in that Formula?
    Thank you very much. And I hope you Understand my question because English is not my language. 🙏🙏🙏

  • @kirasoui
    @kirasoui 5 лет назад

    i lost at 4:25 , why did modulus E cancel out? and why epsilon max is changed to sigma max? im confused

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  5 лет назад

      Hooke's Law. Captain Hooke...arrrgh!! Yo-ho, yo-ho, yo-ho, it's a pirate's life for me.

    • @ralphlacerna5625
      @ralphlacerna5625 4 года назад

      Awts hahah

  • @nikolaynikolkin1955
    @nikolaynikolkin1955 8 лет назад

    Thanks for explaining! Very useful video! Can you tell what kind of program do you use for drawing? Is it paint?

  • @TrueAmenda
    @TrueAmenda 12 лет назад

    For a weirder cross-section beam (asymmetrical), will the strain-profile triangles you drew no longer be the same? (share a similar angle) Thanks

  • @rahnumaahmad9711
    @rahnumaahmad9711 10 лет назад +3

    'My'nus the rant it's good

  • @007hellion
    @007hellion 9 лет назад

    Hi, while calculating how you determine Y should it be measured from top or bottom and why ? in case of symmetrical section its same thing whether you measure from top or bottom but in unsymmetrical section its not the same.

  • @AfzalCassim
    @AfzalCassim 8 лет назад +1

    Thanks!

  • @WHY70122
    @WHY70122 12 лет назад

    I followed the video pretty good until the part when you mention the Negative Strain? I'm confused about the direction of the arrows you draw. Explanation please?

  • @shivpalpatine
    @shivpalpatine 7 лет назад

    what if you only know deflection amount, moment of inertia, elastic modulus, length, and cross section (circular cross section) for a simple supported beam on both sides.
    Force and moment are unknown.

  • @Dan-mw4zu
    @Dan-mw4zu 5 лет назад

    Why is it that Ɛ @ y isn't negative, but the maximum value of Ɛ [@ C] IS negative? If we're defining compressive strain as negative, why is the strain at y [which is above the N.A] not also negative? Thanks

  • @zhangbarry1752
    @zhangbarry1752 9 лет назад +1

    One question, when we calculation the stress, hooke's low can only apply at elastic scope. so for the stress at plastic stage, could you please explain more, because I am thinking the the Sigma along y axis may be not linear

    • @noname-ic5mx
      @noname-ic5mx 8 лет назад +1

      we assume we are in the elastic region (linear region) where you can apply hooks formula. And we don't talk about plastic region

  • @SaiKrishna-vz1up
    @SaiKrishna-vz1up 8 лет назад +1

    Thank u so much

  • @湾湾炸鸡配可乐
    @湾湾炸鸡配可乐 8 лет назад +1

    Thank U !

  • @severalchildren
    @severalchildren 12 лет назад

    I always think of captain Hook, I dont know why.. Har Har Har.
    Lol, Wonderful :)
    P.s. that is not the only thing i learned in this video! haha

  • @dohendra
    @dohendra 9 лет назад +1

    in strain profile ,when we are using similar triangle method to correlate strain at Y and strain max. at C , from where this negative sign came . e and e max both are negative and Y is having same sign as that of C . a bit confusing !!!!

    • @eugeneougo5472
      @eugeneougo5472 9 лет назад +1

      +Dohendra Dubey Check out the first part of the video more keenly you will understand where the negative is coming from.

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  9 лет назад +4

      +Eugene Ougo thank you! I love it when our community responds to comments in a positive way. It makes me feel like I'm part of a massive, moving cloud of learning with lightning bolts streaking across the sky and thunder in its wake!

    • @carbon273
      @carbon273 9 лет назад

      +structurefree I dont understand why E isn't negataive and Emax is. Is it because E = -y/p and y is positive so you will get E?

    • @shubhamkukreja95
      @shubhamkukreja95 8 лет назад

      because e is general and e max is negative due to change in length of section due to compressive force

  • @IceyJunior
    @IceyJunior 8 лет назад

    negative stress should be -> , right ? 5.09

  • @garimashama1426
    @garimashama1426 9 лет назад

    sir why the stress profile and strain profile looks different ...i mean where strain is negative stress is also negative ...should it not be in same crossed curve like stain beside of "K" please help me

    • @shubhamkukreja95
      @shubhamkukreja95 8 лет назад

      garima shama he has shown that by arrow , right for tensile

  • @pop4ti
    @pop4ti 7 лет назад

    how could i determine the value of y ?

  • @justpassingby7262
    @justpassingby7262 5 лет назад

    Just wondering , if the bending moment is equal to the stress times first moment of area . Why dont we stop here and say that the bending moment is zero. ( I know that its not but just wondering why)

    • @justpassingby7262
      @justpassingby7262 5 лет назад

      Ahh I think I figured it out , is it cause stress is not a constant but stress max is ?

  • @abokaled94
    @abokaled94 10 лет назад +1

    I LOVE YOU

  • @imusician8885
    @imusician8885 7 лет назад

    Thnx bro

  • @devops6697
    @devops6697 9 лет назад +8

    damn you should be my prof

  • @tiagoperon306
    @tiagoperon306 10 лет назад +14

    selfish equation... heahehaeha
    i will never forget this

  • @yamikawaii321
    @yamikawaii321 7 лет назад

    Why the summation of force of x section is
    ∑F=0
    integral sigma da
    I don't understand what is meant by integral sigma da

  • @abaahad1250
    @abaahad1250 10 лет назад +1

    helpful

  • @willtolife9323
    @willtolife9323 7 лет назад

    So, The view is not a section, but an elevation? what?

  • @rockherostar333
    @rockherostar333 11 лет назад +1

    Hahaha lol you rock man :D "the most selfish formula"

  • @amirhossainraju676
    @amirhossainraju676 8 лет назад +1

    Bammm it's great.😆😆

  • @foureyedcyclopse9412
    @foureyedcyclopse9412 2 года назад +1

    I can't believe it was 3-D the whole time.

  • @tanyantanr1352
    @tanyantanr1352 Год назад +1

    I'm a big Ayn Rand fan.

  • @nomipakistanli
    @nomipakistanli 10 лет назад +22

    SELFISH EQUATION........

  • @hussnaincheema8422
    @hussnaincheema8422 4 года назад +1

    imma remember this forever
    the most selfish equation in the world

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  4 года назад

      Aww yeah!! Of course the next question...is selfishness negative? Hmmmm.....

  • @tumblevid
    @tumblevid 7 лет назад

    4:00 loool

  • @xinninglam3807
    @xinninglam3807 7 лет назад +1

    cool, didn't know being 'stress'ful is being selfish

  • @danielyin9643
    @danielyin9643 8 лет назад

    Thanks! this was really helpful. One suggestion: don't talk about the color you're choosing or say BAYAM since it cuts the train of thoughts and makes the information hard to understand. For a video like this it's not necessary to be constantly saying something. Hope this helped.

    • @joshuakravitz1524
      @joshuakravitz1524 8 лет назад

      I like when he does it. It makes the learning seem more natural and less scripted. STRUCTUREFREEEEE

  • @hddevani
    @hddevani 9 лет назад

    Hi there ...can you please give me your email id ? I have some questions and examples which I couldn't able to do ...as I am preparing for exam and refereeing to your series of lectures so it will be extremely helpful... Thank you...

  • @sushrutdeshpande5599
    @sushrutdeshpande5599 8 лет назад +3

    Selfish formula LOL

  • @shielaumali145
    @shielaumali145 7 лет назад

    selfish equation HAHAHAHHA

  • @Manish_Kumar_Singh
    @Manish_Kumar_Singh 8 лет назад

    stop saying "baaaam" ....... irritating