Total Recall movie review
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 авг 2024
- We have ourselves another telling of the book "We Can Remember it for You Wholesale" in the form of a NEW movie version of "Total Recall". Jeremy gives you his review
See more videos by Jeremy here: / jeremyjahns
Follow Jeremy on Twitter: / jeremyjahns
Friend Jeremy on Facebook: / realjeremyjahns
For more Awesometacularness, Subscribe to Jeremys blog here: www.jeremyjahns...
![Eminem - Somebody Save Me (feat. Jelly Roll) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Vwa0HenQMi4/mqdefault.jpg)
Bryan Cranston: the one guy who came off of Malcolm in the Middle with a career.
+teheyepatch I've been wondering whatever happened to the rest of the cast.
Piama (Francis's wife) played a small role in The Three Stooges (2012) as a receptionist & Lois I guess had some TV show roles here & there.
Oh yeah, Abe (Stevie's Father) is playing Bebop in Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 2 (2016).
I wonder what became of Francis, Reese, Malcolm & Dewey.
+Nicksolo85 Malcolm is in sharknado 3 lol he has fallen
The actor who played Malcolm was once the highest paid child actor for a good amount of time
@@seajunleung he didnt fall. He had to stop acting due to concussions
I have one question, just one:
Why do so many directors think you can improve action scenes my making them really hard to see?
it's a technique that's supposed to make you feel like you're in the movie experiencing everything first hand thus immersing you further into the movie
however all it does is make us feel like we are going to barf and i really wish they would stop doing it
Titan Jo That explains the shaky cam. Even though the eyes of real people would stay focused on the target, something that is impossible with current camera technology.
But what about the extreme closeups and the frantic editing?
I think in some cases confusion is the intended effect, the idea being that we should have no more an idea of what is happening than the lead character does.
To me, that would make most sense towards the beginning, where characters probably don't know what is going on. It would make less sense towards the end.
As it is, though, we should definitely be cutting back on the whole shaky cam nonsense. Action just looks better when you can tell what's going on, and if there isn't a particular reason for it, it's an unnecessary effect.
TL, DNR: it makes sense when you think about it, but I also agree that generally the way it's used is stupid.
Zachary Sieg The problem with that theory is your eyes will stay focused on what you are looking at. Why everything else will shake, your centre of view will stay sharp.
And you will certainly not change your viewpoint every second.
I understand what you mean, our protagonist got attacked by the police and fights them without actually knowing how.
But I have the feeling the scene is only hard to see, because the director could not come up with a way an unarmed and confused man can dispose of several armed policemen without making it look absolutely stupid.
Schwarzer Ritter i'm not saying that it works i'm just saying that was the intended result. it's still a shitty technique that needs to stop
Original one is better, but I actually enjoyed this remake. Beautiful production design, nicely filmed action, good acting, interesting plot. Wish the characters were more fleshed out though.
So I can understand why people who liked the original didn't like this movie, but honestly, I really liked it.
i actually thought it was better
I feel the same because I didn't really like the original, too campy. But if you like the original, I can see why this isn't your cup of tea.
It's really best for the viewer to go into it treating the movie as a stand alone and not a reboot. Total Recall, RoboCop and Dredd remakes are all awesometacular for one simple reason. They are what we hoped the originals would be when we were watching the originals. Total Recall the original, yeah it was cool, but we knew it was limited by the special effects of the time. To me the camp of the originals push the movies towards a comedy side of the movie spectrum. I wanted action, the remakes deliver that.
XCyclonusX Okay, the reboot of Dredd was better than the original simply because the original wasn't that good, but as for Total Recall and Robocop, they weren't necessarily full-on camp, but the humor was a big part of them. Both feature a fair bit of satirical elements that has come to be considered a trademark of films from Paul Verhoeven (who directed both of the originals). I haven't seen the Robocop remake (I saw a clip that looked really bad and turned me off to it completely), but I have seen the Total Recall redo and while far from bad, it lacked a couple things that made the original great, those being the aforementioned satirical elements and the extreme violence. I just watched the original Total Recall last night and while some of the effects now show their age (the faces of characters struggling to breathe on oxygen-less Mars are pretty funny), the Mars landscapes and sets within the city still look breathtaking. Better special effects do not make a better movie.
Same, I liked this one, the other one, I haven't watched it because it just doesn't work for me, it's ironically the one that's too easy to dismiss and forget, someone called that a near classic and I'm like, Arnold's Terminator is a near classic or a pure classic but this? nah, I'd remember this one even 10 years later, like how I remember Shutter Island or Inception better then Titanic, if we refer to DiCaprio's movies, so, there's that ^^
I watched this one before the original and I quite liked it because of the action, acting and aesthetic. The original is better though but this one is a bit underrated
I like the old movie better for two reasons:
1. It has Schwartzenegger.
2. I haven't seen the new one yet.
3. It has humans
Compared to the Red Dawn remake this is a goddamn masterpiece.
Unpopular opinion: I liked the remake of red dawn
Red dawn remake wasn’t too bad tbh. I enjoyed it. But it was definitely LEVELS below this remake.
Usually the remake isn't as good as the original, but as long as it is entertaining, it does its job. I like Colin Farrell, Kate Beckinsale, and the director, Len Wiseman. They did a good job.
Original wins hands down.
It’s weird because my Dad was a fan of Arnold, but he said the movies where Arnold really shined that hold up well were Terminator and Predator. He said comparing the two he actually felt like this was better to him in his opinion. He said the action is pretty well choreographed it’s not badly acted and the effects and cinematography at some points is just gorgeous.
He said he really liked it. He actually said that he prefers this one to the old one.
I'm with your Dad on this one.
The original was way better
+NEEEEVANS Your right about that. This shows how to make a sub par remake.
I was the 100th like on this comment so allow me to give you a “2 WEEKS!!”
The old one... I loved all the dark, 80s grit that came with it:)
All these people who strongly dislike the remake think so because they saw it in theatres , I just watched the remake on Netflix witch is the directors cut, 20 minutes of extra footage. It makes a BIG difference, give it a rematch
So they made the theatre version bad on purpose?
Schwarzer Ritter No, it's just missing a lot of important shots
Brian Wilson They left out on purpose.
i disagree completely on the issue of whether we the audience Know or not that its real or in his mind. In the newer version i feel that we the audience are meant to know definitively that it is NOT just in his head. Where as in the Arnold version we honestly dont, and the ending reinforced that feeling that Wait oh shit, this is exactly what is asked for in his interview and this COULD in fact just be the end of his Mind Trip!!
That’s a point I was shaking my head negatively during this review.
The remake doesn’t leave space for interpretation, you know what things are. But the original is really debatable about if all was just in his head or not.
And this makes me like the original more.
TMLCJLK the original, if u watch it with the commentary, is actually a dream. It has been confirmed by the director. BUT ignoring that fact I will definitely agree with you that the original will keep you guessing. You seriously dont know if its real or not and you have to decide for yourself. it does a great job at keeping it up to the interpretation of the viewer. Unless you watch it with the commentary that is.
spanishforyou123 Thanks for the info, I didn't know that. I never watched the commentaries.
actually in the Director's Cut to the remake it adds 20 mins of more footage that actually keeps you guessing and the ending now adds a tiny scene that leaves it ambiguous and makes you wonder if he is dreaming or not. The commentary on the remake the director said that the Director's Cut scenes were removed because the studio pretty much implied that the audience is stupid and will be confused by it. But he added back in the Director's Cut because he gives us more credit than that.
I completely disagree with you on that.
The original had scenes that told the audience that there was more than it just being in his head because of the conversations that the side characters were having that did not involve the main character Quaid (Especially so when he went to Recall). However you had none of that in the remake, really adding to the suspicion if it were real or not because it was mostly just from the main characters prospective. That and in the remake, shit started to hit the fan immediately after he got injected, (Which they actually started to do unlike the original; really leaving you wondering) It was not some time afterwards as they did in the original, and even in the original, the side characters had said that they didn't even upload the program. Which is really something that threw off the 'its all in his head' feeling.
(Plus in the original, there were subplots with the side characters that made it feel that it wasn't just Quaid's dream, but actual events that were happening outside of him. AKA, his wife was the enemies 'old lady' as they put it.)
The original and the remake both leave you wondering if it were real or just in his head. In my opinion, I think that the remake really handled it better than the original did. Especially with the ending, the remake really reinforced the thought of, 'Holy shit, was it all just in his head?!' When it shows that he didn't have the tattoo that he got when he went to rekall.
None of this is to say that i don't like the original, because i absolutely love it. It is actually one of my favorite movies till this day and i have watched it more times than i can count. But i have to admit that the remake did a way better job than the original at making me question if it were all real or just in his head. They both have their pluses and minuses, but that factor is a serious minus for the original and a huge plus for the remake.
(I know that this is like a 6 year old post, but whatever)
"HEY BENNY! SCREW YOUUUU!!!"
Watching some old Jeremy Jahns videos in 2021. Ah good times.
Who watch this in 2019 and remember thanos "this does put a smile on my face"
Thank you for using Johnny Cab!
Mars WAS in the original short story, they just never went there as it was all part of the reality questioning point of the storyline.
I wish these obnoxious RUclips "reviewers" would do a little research (or, I don't know, actually read the short story I mean it isn't very long) before making declarative statements.
right the original short also had aliens and mutants
Haven't seen the old film, saw this film (missed the ending though)...I will say I did find it mildly entertaining, but that's partially because I was having a fun imagining the robots talking to each other, like that one robot sitting next to Kate Beckinsale when she was driving like crazy ("Oh my gosh, oh my gosh, my f***cking servos, what is WRONG with you, lady?!").
The old one is the best
agreed
ɷ I Havee Watcheddd Thissss Movieee Leakedddd Versionnn Here : - t.co/SjZpZXw5gt
"HEY , i know who you are."
"She is all like -Oh HEY i know who you are!"
"....Because HEY , she's hot too."
best use of "hey" on human history.
I like the old version. It was a great sci-fi action movie for its time.
"And I'll be home just in time for corn flakes"
Was another great line from the old one.
The old one was W A Y better!
Wow, I totally disagree. The original is a classic unlike the remake which failed to impress at the box office and sadly has already been forgotten by the general public.
+Eclipse Hero really ??? I love the original movie I haven't seen this one yet,I love sci fi with some good story behind rather than just mutants or spaceships type of thing,what's your top 5 favourite movies ???
My top scfi movies would be: 2001, Blade Runner, Star Trek 2, Aliens, and Empire Strikes Back
This was only a decent/mediocre action movie whereas the one with Arnie was highly original, creative and fun.
To those saying this one is closer to the short story, the original film was never meant to be an adaptation it was simply a catalyst that inspired the concept of the movie.
i understand that you liked Arnolds version but those of us that liked the 2012 version is because as you said It's closer to the short story. That's where most haters of this movie make the mistake instead of comparing it to the short story (which most audience don't know about) they compare it to arnolds very loosely based version. Some just hate it but others just hate it out of nostalgia and for being loyal to Arnold.
***** a true but odd thing to say considering arnold himself isn't a very good actor lol
*Spoiler comment*
The original movie did a good job getting your to care about the mutants.
At the end of this movie, when the soldiers were send to kill the workers, I couldn't care less.
Colin Farrell: Played a vampire in Fright Night.
Kate Beckinsale: Played a Vampire in Underworld
Jessica Biel: Killed Vampires in Blade III.
I like how it was different, much better than any other remake I've seen.
Just watched this movie. I didn't think it was as good as the original. The fights, acting, and tech were all better in the original.
I didn't hate this movie. I got my scifi fix from it. The movie didn't flow very well and had a few to many plot holes or things that didn't make sense. I thought they would use dream logic to explain some things but they never did.
The guy escapes from the police and the first place he goes is his old house. The police aren't waiting for him there. They do show up after a long time goes by.
His friend comes back to wake him up. The friend wants him to shoot his lady friend. So the friend is lying. Lets just say he shoots his lady friend and doesn't wake up. The very next thing he would do is shoot the unarmed lying friend. The scene doesn't make sense because they didn't present a way to get him back.
At one point there are these moving elevators that move in all directions. For some unknown reason they move at different speeds. One moves super fast to smash a robot while another moves slow giving them enough time to run out of the way. Basically the elevators move slow for the good guys and fast for the bad guys.
The Recall place was legal and had ADs up all over the place but for some reason it was in the shady part of the town and the guy running it made it seem like it was a underground crime thing.
There were a lot of stuff I just couldn't shut my brain down for. However, the tech of the world was fun to see.
Right
Acting in the original was HORRIBLE! Lol.
"Better acting in the original" lmao
Both Total Recalls were awesome.I really liked this one. I took my son to see, and he had never seen the first one, so it was a new experience for him. It was fun for me too. I viewed the movie like a roller coaster. I knew what was going to happen, but that didn't make the twists less fun. The only real issue I had was that travel through the core like that is impossible, but then so is time travel and there's a lot of movies based on that. All in all I enjoyed the movie :)
I got to say, due to quality of acting I preferred the new one. The original one was fresh and original when I saw (as I had not read the book yet), but Arnold and is rediculous one liners "consider that a divorce" and "hey Benny, screw you!" and then stabs him with the drill. Ach! Arnold does that though, Batman & Robin may have been watchable had Arnold been the only one removed from the movie, yeah, I said it (don't know if I actually believe that one though). New one is a little better.
PLEASE REVIEW THE ASSASINATION OF JESSE JAMES BY THE COWARD ROBERT FORD.
Caps for effect;) PLEASE
lol the name of the book sounds like Hollywood's reasoning for remaking movies. We can remember it for you, $10.
I did enjoyed the new one but I still prefer the first.I've never read the book but I liked that Veerhoven style when I was kid.Plus the score of Jerry Goldsmith in Total Recall 1990 was awesome.The new one made me think too much of Minority Report and Blade Runner visually,altough its the same author.
I'm a big fan of the original but I enjoyed the new one. It has some really cool visual and the world they made was very impressive.
I liked arnolds better. not just because of arnold but because of the mars concept!!
dont know why they toke that important plot element of this movie!?
"We Can Remember It for You Wholesale"
I enjoyed both the old one and the new one, they had a very different vibe going on.
I thought this new one had some pretty epic action scenes. Popcorn entertainment.
Funny you say No Alcohol Required. When I finished watching the movie, one of the workers found a liquor bottle on the floor. LOL
New one for sure. I can see where some people liked the original but not my cup of tea. The new one was little easier to follow and felt like if it were possible it could happen. Where as the original seemed to rely on being weird, bizarre and gross because it is sifi. And side note I felt the new Conan was better but no can do Terminator like Arnold, as well his other famous films. Just those two I thought would have been better if done different.
Gabriel Krebs The old one wasn't hard to follow, it just does a better job of disguising it's exposition better than this one because studios now feel that audiences need everything conveyed to them verbally. As for the bizarre nature of the original, that's one of the charms of it for me. The extreme violence alone is entertaining enough, but I mean come on: where else can you see a midget prostitute standing on a bar and firing a machine gun into a crowded room of disfigured mutants?
Well whatever it was I hated the original and prefer the new it has way better acting
shredmaster2009 Waiting for a Bladerunner remake and for these new kiddies to try to tell me the new one's better LOL.
Bladerunner is another one that I did not like. I know I have just committed blasphemy to all you old farts who think they know best. Let us have our opinion and you can have your's.
GET YA ASS TO MARS!!!
nikita petrov
it a big ol' butt yo [shrugs]
"I've got five kids to feed" there's already too many nods to the Arnie film
I liked this movie, thought the setting looked cool, the action was great (some shaky cam but not like Hunger Games bad, it didn't annoy me at all) and Colin Farrell was great as a lead. Like u said Jeremy, won't win any awards, but it's pretty entertaining :)
Compared to the original this movie sucks. It's overlong, dull, the dialog is horrible and the action scenes are never engaging or exciting. It's the opposite of everything said in this review. I'm surprised at you Jeremy. P.S. Just because an actress is hot shouldn't be the reason they get a pass for a bad performance. Kate is no Richter by any means. All they did was swap character motivations and events around from the other film, and even that didn't make it clever. Stick to the Arnold version.
This movie was not as good as the Arnold one but pshhhhh the action was way better in this one.
Arnold for life
I didn't read the book, never saw the previous film, and i LOVED it! The movie is very good, the actors are great, the special effects? I liked all of it. I don't think people are fair saying it's a shitty because they are hung up on the old version. It's like you wouldn't like to watch a movie because you already read the book... But then I have no idea what you are on about with the Mars so maybe I loose out a lot, but I don't feel like it The film in itself was great in my opinion.
Total Recall is a 2012 American science fiction action film, based on the 1990 film of the same name and by extension the 1966 short story "We Can Remember It for You Wholesale" by Philip K. Dick.
So yes it is based on the original film and they are both loosely based on the short story.
huh did we watch the same thing? I think we did, buy this movie was terrible. At one point they climb out of the elevator thing at some 15000 km/h, nobody ever shoots Colin Farrell when he AGAIN gets himself captured; this movie is soo stupid.
I almost fell asleep to this movie.. It's really bad and stupid.
I couldn't watch the movie. Just one big chase scene.
I just saw this today. And I like it better than the "old version". Then again I did read "We Can Remember it for You Wholesale" long before I saw the old version. And I thought Colin Ferrall did a better job than Arnie did... (just my 2¢ worth) But still all of your comments were valid. Its just that I feel the new crew carried the story so much better that I didn't care if I knew where it was going.
I haven't seen this version yet, but do own the original movie on blue ray and it still kicks ass to this day. Me and my girl saw this trailer at The Dark Knight Rises and I told her all about it, and we watch the original one yesterday(8/3/2012) and it wasn't her cup of tea, but she like it. But now I have watch The Hunger Games because of that. Promise is a promise.
ehh I like this one more than the original
:-\ :-\ :-\
Colin Farrel, 2 remakes, MIAMI VICE & TOTAL RECALL, both sucks! there is no good scripts in Hollywood....
I got the old one even on Blu Ray and I still wanna see this one and I probably will like, if not even love it, because of the sheer fact, that Cranston is in the movie. I mean seriously... Jeremy has a point. Why not put Bryan Cranston into every movie? Cranston as a dwarf in Hobbit? Check. Cranston as a sergeant or something in Dark Knight Rises? Check. Cranston as a sidekick for DiCaprio in Django? Check. I'd dig that guy in EVERY role in EVERY movie :D
The remake was okay If you have never seen the cult classic by Verhoeven. I for one watched both so I can give my opinion, I prefer the original as Verhoeven is one of those complex directors like Terry Gilliam, Christopher Nolan, Darren Aronofsky and others I just cant remember at this moment.
David Lynch? he's as complex as complex can get.
This is your worst review Jeremy. This movie was plain bad.
You forget this is his opinion
Of course, but... why he find this crap enjoyable? He didnt explained neither.
Diego Esteban well he did... if you listened to the end, i really liked this movie too tbh
Diego Esteban it’s just his opinion, if you don’t like it that’s okay
Would it be better to watch the old one first or the new one? I mean, if you want the most enjoyment without knowing any of the twists?
In the extended directors cut, there is the noticable abcense of the peace sign tatoo on his arm, hinting it may have all been a memory implanted by rekall.
Good question. All I can say is if you see one first, it will ruin if for you for the other one. The new one is a virtual carbon copy when it comes to plot. Howerver they are both good in their own right.
I am about to watch the new one on Blu Ray.. but I can already give you my answer.. the old one.. the gore alone in that movie was fantastic
The original is still going to be here. Just because there's a remake doesn't mean the original will just disappear. So be happy you have both versions. I personally like this more then the original. If you prefer arnold that's great you have that as well!.
I havn't seen either versions of Total Recall... so, considering that either movie ruins the "surprise" factor for the other, which version is worth watching first?
Exactly. I liked this movie. They can't let go of the past Total Recall. It's like saying the first phone ever made is better and more convenient than modern cell phones.
Being I product of the 80s I'd say this version was OK but it doesn't hold a candle to Arnie's 1990 version. Probably the best thing you can say about the improvements by the new movie are the special effects. But the 1990 version was cutting edge for its time and the twists are great.
Love both....
My favourite trilogy is the
"Ocean's Trilogy"
I haven't seen either yet so thank you for not spoiling anything for me
I actually saw the original during the summer, and I gotta say, it was a kick ass movie. I like how the story went and the ending, plus I've seen the Nostalgia Critics review of it. Jeremy have you seen the review? If you haven't you should check it out, its 1 of his better ones.
Nobody can beat Michael Ironside as the psycho heavy in the original.
That's really just up to you but yea you should watch it regardless because it's just one of those movies that everyone should watch at least once. Fun to watch chilling with friends and hey it's got Arnold in it, nuff said.
Whenever i want an honest opinion of a movie before i watch it, i always watch your review first!
Actually in the short story by Philip K. Dick, Mars was present, and a huge part of the story. It wasn't a book really, although it was essentially the title story for a collection of different stories.
do you think it's better to watch the old or the new version first?
If I still haven't seen the old one, should I watch this one first, and then he old one, or the other way around? On one hand, I wanna understand & enjoy the throw backs, but on the other hand, I don't wanna spoil the story when I'd rather see it in better graphics & animation. Any opinions?
First one!!! Please don't let this new unimpressive version ruin the amount of enjoyment you can have with all the fun twists, turns, and PRACTICAL EFFECTS in the original. The original is a really fun movie. The new version is just average.
i love this one...it was different enough, a lot more action and totally dug the whole traveling through the earth's core. bought this one on dvd (no blueray).
The original is always be the best for me, no lens flares, hilarious moments and need i say "Quade... start the reactor!"
If you completely forgot what happened in the other Total Recall movie, would your rating for it be higher. I havent seen the old one, im going to see this one today (because its still showing in my area - get movies late, last to have em - except one of the first to get Avengers)
the old one, all the way.
but this one wasn't THAT bad
Michael Ironside from the original was SO AWESOME!
unbelievable but "something" to watch Kate Beckensal was awesome, maybe I forgot what happened in the first movie and this is my first time watching the 2012 version. Can someone please explain if he got his memories at the very end when he saw the tattoo was not on his arm any longer or was that removed by the doctor?
I haven't seen the new one yet, but I highly doubt it'll be as memorable as the original
What I really liked about the original was that It took a short Story that was semi-interesting and made a Fun Sci-Fi Action Adventure with Offbeat humor, I like how they created this mythology on mars about reactors that give an atmosphere, thats somthing i would've liked to have seen more of in Sequels but instead we get a remake oh well, I'll check it out for curiositys sake.
I just finished watching this and it was a good film. The thing that is in mind is, everything that happened was all an illusion and he is still strapped in Total Rekall or was it all real?
I have never seen the old movie so I didn't have clue what was going on and all the twists surprised me I really enjoyed this movie
If I hadn't seen either version of this movie... which version would anyone recommend to watch first?
I watched original and this new one, and I can't decide that one of them is my favorite. Second one has better action scenes and scenery is much better in last one. First recall had much more developed idea about changing memory, idea that was relativelly new in cinematic world. Actors are much better in last one, in my opinion. I would say that first recall is classic, while this one is pretty good remake.
SPOILER ABOUT DIRECTOR'S CUT!!the directors cut is way better imo. ethan hawke appears in the holographic video saying that he is Carl Hauser revealing to quaid that both his memory and appearance were completely altered by the UFB. and Cohaagen says that (he could be lying) Hauser willingly let himself be changed that everything was a ruse to kill the resistance leader who in the DC is melinas father. and the alternate ending leaves you wondering if he's awake or dreaming.
So if i havent seen this movie will i enjoy it more?
After watching both versions if anyone can tell me why the old is better than the new one please tell me, because I just don't understand how.
I prefer the new one, i feel like the movie and the storyline is much more fluid and the simple action and art style was simply astonishing. Loved the old New York City, had some kind of post-apocalyptic feelings to it.
there was tone of the vampire elders in it as well. Lotta vampire actors.
Well, annoyingly they left it to the directors cut, but they added one small bit to the final scene where he looks down and see's a bandage over the peace tattoo on his arm, and when he takes it off the peace tattoo he got at Rekall is gone.
Seeing the original makes this new one more enjoyable,its fun comparing,and given I watch movies I like more than once,knowing the plot didn't ruin this movie at all.
Some songs from movie are on the album Zhod: Field Dreams on iTunes!
Jeremy you mention how you read Batman comics in your Noland Batman reviews. can you please please start reviewing comics in general since you obviously love them!
With all these reboots, pretty soon they're gonna change the Hollywood sign for "Recycling Bin."
Not necessarily, the 1990 version was "loosely" based on the Phillip Dick novel. This movie was "based" on the 1990 production of "Total Recall." This means that this movie was entirely inaccurate to what it was "based on."
I've never seen the old one! I've heard of it, but I've never seen it. To be honest with you. I give it to the new one! The new one was really cool!
I never saw the original,so I liked this movie quite a bit. It's not one of those I'm itching to see again,but I liked it. I will watch the original someday.
If I've never seen the original should I watch it before I watch this?