The level of hypervirtuosity and simultaneous sensitivity required for playing exceedingly difficult works by Szymanowski, Sorabji, Eckhardt-Gramatte, Godowsky, Henselt, Thalberg and Reger just never seems to stop amazing... This is a very fine performance. Thank you for posting this.
Szymanowsky is not a salon composer as so many of those you mentioned truly are . Thalberg 's studies are actually serious decent works . I was amazed to hear and see them here !
I DID lump them together rather haphazardly, probably because I don't have patience to spend time learning their piano music. We aging Boomers do become rather cantankerous 😂🤣😅
The whole of this sound architecture is a flight into the Sublime. It is a very beautiful music played with exceptional skill and an impressive inner feeling. A delightful listening and therapeutic experience.
This one is too rich with too many clashing colors. Listen to Ravel's Gaspard de la Nuit stuff. Every note has a purpose with him. Scriabin had some good stuff too. But when it was confusing it was meant to be that way in either an eerie or distinctly twisted way. This guy on the other hand seems to be all over the place and unsure of many things many a time, with some decent nuggets here and there. Obviously some of it is good. But it doesn't quite do it for me overall. This is my opinion. Feel free to disagree
Just a "fun" fact - Heinrich Neuhaus attempted suicide after hearing the premiere, coz he realised he will never be pianist as good as Rubinstein nor as good a composer as Szymanowski was
@@dedikandrej There is also a comic relief right after that where Rubinstein and Szymanowsky got into a fight over a girl and stopped talking to each other for a whole year :)
@@szymonwantua861 Arthur Rubinstein : My young years . Popular Library Edition . Published by arrangement with Alfred Knopf. Copyright 1973 by Rubinstein family There is very good and detailed biography of Rubinstein that might interest you: "Rubinstein . A Life" by Harvey Sachs . Grove Press New York (1995)
After hearing the violin Myths i wanted to hear more of his piano music. Always loved the violin concerto but the 1st violin sonata(are there more) really interests me. Fell in love w this Sonata immediately!
The structure is a bit like Beethoven’s 32nd Sonata and Prokofiev’s 2nd Symphony (whose structure was also influenced by the 32nd) - a first movement allegro and a second movement theme and variations.
Scriabin"s influence is visible. Nevertheless, here he harmony remains linked to the triadic classical chord, while Scriabin fades away through a systematic use of synthetic modes;
I like his orchestral music much more. This gives just the impression of unrest and chaos. As most 20th century difficult piano pieces do. And this applies to traditional and atonal ones.
No key signature: Ignore key, uses accidentals. Adds a key signature: Continues ignoring key. Based chad Szymanowski doesn't give a fuck about no key signatures.
@@orgue2999 Perhaps that applies to Reger's organ works, but not his more luxuriant orchestral works (see the Serenade, Ballet Suite, Four Arnold Böcklin Tone Poems, Consecration of the Night, Song of the Transfigured, The Nuns, the Romantic Suite ...)
Interestingly enough, certain of the figurations in the fugue remind me of the fugue in Beethoven's op. 106, the Hammerklavier. Obviously, Szyamnowski's voiceleading is much more chromatic, but still, there are faint echoes, at least for me.
passionless and plodding. pianist doesn't have the mechanism to play this piece correctly. melodic and harmonic drama is totally ruined by the amateurish tempo. too expansive when it should be fast and violent.
나는 희빈 장씨니라 꺄아하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하
![OhGeesy x Lefty Gunplay - What It Iz [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/L0yzW9t2ixk/mqdefault.jpg)
Feeling the influence of Reger (a compliment) in this brilliant work-like other listeners.👌
23:06 onward is such an amazing progression
Indeed
KAROL SZYMANOWSKI ❤️
Wspaniałe i ponadczasowe. Ta muzyka będzie zachwycać wiecznie.
My favourite Szymanowski Sonata out of the 3, perfect balance between his early Late-Romantic style and his soon to come Impressionist-Atonal style
you changed your pfp again lol
@@allosarin7924 Yea, this is the best one yet
That's what I said! But yes, I totally agree with you
The level of hypervirtuosity and simultaneous sensitivity required for playing exceedingly difficult works by Szymanowski, Sorabji, Eckhardt-Gramatte, Godowsky, Henselt, Thalberg and Reger just never seems to stop amazing... This is a very fine performance. Thank you for posting this.
Szymanowsky is not a salon composer as so many of those you mentioned truly are . Thalberg 's studies are actually serious decent works . I was amazed to hear and see them here !
I’m not sure about Sorabji though 😂
I DID lump them together rather haphazardly, probably because I don't have patience to spend time learning their piano music. We aging Boomers do become rather cantankerous 😂🤣😅
@@kmpiano1 Not sure about him how?
@@kmpiano1Sorabji is great
As Im getting tired with so much exposure(listening) to the 2nd movement, Im slowly realizing how magically and incredibly the first one is composed.
0:05 - 1. Allegro assai - molto appassionato
9:52 - 2. Theme and Variations
Thanks.
9:50 not 52
The whole of this sound architecture is a flight into the Sublime. It is a very beautiful music played with exceptional skill and an impressive inner feeling. A delightful listening and therapeutic experience.
This one is too rich with too many clashing colors.
Listen to Ravel's Gaspard de la Nuit stuff. Every note has a purpose with him. Scriabin had some good stuff too. But when it was confusing it was meant to be that way in either an eerie or distinctly twisted way.
This guy on the other hand seems to be all over the place and unsure of many things many a time, with some decent nuggets here and there. Obviously some of it is good. But it doesn't quite do it for me overall. This is my opinion. Feel free to disagree
If Reger's and Scriabin's music had a baby it would be this :D
No, it‘s Reger‘s and Scriabin‘s multiple orgasms
So on spot..
Premiered in Berlin by Artur Rubenstein on Dec. 1, 1911, according to the Rubenstein biography I am currently reading.
Just a "fun" fact - Heinrich Neuhaus attempted suicide after hearing the premiere, coz he realised he will never be pianist as good as Rubinstein nor as good a composer as Szymanowski was
@@dedikandrej There is also a comic relief right after that where Rubinstein and Szymanowsky got into a fight over a girl and stopped talking to each other for a whole year :)
What's the title of the biography?
@@szymonwantua861 Arthur Rubinstein : My young years . Popular Library Edition . Published by arrangement with Alfred Knopf. Copyright 1973 by Rubinstein family
There is very good and detailed biography of Rubinstein that might interest you: "Rubinstein . A Life" by Harvey Sachs . Grove Press New York (1995)
@@PeterLunowPL Part two of Rubinstein's autobiography was called "My many Years.'
Hamelin's live performin was stunnin! Still remember how speechless I was.
Love the fugue at the end
24:58
After hearing the violin Myths i wanted to hear more of his piano music. Always loved the violin concerto but the 1st violin sonata(are there more) really interests me. Fell in love w this Sonata immediately!
How do you compose something like this? How do you find ideas for this? 2:58 for example
You... compose?
@@segmentsAndCurves Yes of course, but I could never think of such a theme or improvise it
@@tarikeld11 Sometimes it takes ages to get a musical idea.
So uhh... yeah, get rekt.
Be a genius, start at a very young age.
dense stuff. very dense stuff. my brain has been blown apart 😢 thank you
You are right, just too dense and too rich.
a very difficult work, performed with consummate skill and sensitivity and understanding.
Lionel Soracco sounds horrible tho
@@nezkeys79 honestly, I love it
@@scriabinismydog2439 2 years on...still sounds horrible
@@nezkeys79 Mmh... Well, why do you think that?
@@scriabinismydog2439 maybe because its not tonal? It doesnt sound pleasant?
27:50 Best moment
Set the finale as my new ringtone
The structure is a bit like Beethoven’s 32nd Sonata and Prokofiev’s 2nd Symphony (whose structure was also influenced by the 32nd) - a first movement allegro and a second movement theme and variations.
27:12
Sounds like a Shostakovich Symphony!
Scriabin"s influence is visible. Nevertheless, here he harmony remains linked to the triadic classical chord, while Scriabin fades away through a systematic use of synthetic modes;
Very fine.
24:00 Fugue ;)
I like his orchestral music much more. This gives just the impression of unrest and chaos. As most 20th century difficult piano pieces do. And this applies to traditional and atonal ones.
Nah
@@GUILLOM Tru
9:50 Movement 2
great
The fugue at 23:59
One of my favorite fugues of all time
No key signature: Ignore key, uses accidentals.
Adds a key signature: Continues ignoring key.
Based chad Szymanowski doesn't give a fuck about no key signatures.
This is a very difficult work.
Mozart is more difficult, believe me
@@andreassorg7294 no it’s not
@@andreassorg7294 that's a big laugh right there buddy, mozart is easy asf compared to such a masterpiece as this.
@@andreassorg7294 I don't "believe" my friend, I think.
@@belialah Do what you think to do, but don't call me your friend, because I'm not
The fugue until 27:13, my god
This is very Regerian / Regeresque.
You need sensivity to play this one, so it can't be Regerian
@@orgue2999 I totally reject your opinion. Compare the piano writing and harmonic language to Reger's wonderful (and sensitive) Bach variations.
That's a joke about some rigid Reger's works, but it's not regerian for me.
@@orgue2999 Perhaps that applies to Reger's organ works, but not his more luxuriant orchestral works (see the Serenade, Ballet Suite, Four Arnold Böcklin Tone Poems, Consecration of the Night, Song of the Transfigured, The Nuns, the Romantic Suite ...)
24:00 Fuga
Sorry didn't notice this lol
03:40
23:40
0:36
Prokofiev Sonata 3/3 :)
lmao,this sonata is early than that one
2:17 "non arpeggiando" = "you'd better be able to reach a 10th..."
Anyone hear Liszt's Dante Sonata in the fugue (last) part of the piece?
Interestingly enough, certain of the figurations in the fugue remind me of the fugue in Beethoven's op. 106, the Hammerklavier. Obviously, Szyamnowski's voiceleading is much more chromatic, but still, there are faint echoes, at least for me.
Very difficult to sight read
Szymanowski made great noise for piano.
?
Did Scriabin and Debussy have coffee one day? - 1st Movement
시마노프스키
omg :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
omfg
Kozey Rest
15:49 var: V
18:16 : var VII
9:50 mvmt 2
The only fact that tells this music to me: the demise of late-romantic piled up sounds with tons of useless notes is not far or has already begun
Tedious! Boring. No more! Stop playing!
passionless and plodding. pianist doesn't have the mechanism to play this piece correctly. melodic and harmonic drama is totally ruined by the amateurish tempo. too expansive when it should be fast and violent.
WTF?
You can NEVER judge a piece for being too slow.
this performance was drastically worsened by seeing a picture of Szymanowski at the beginning
Why
Does he have the hat on when he plays this piece? Or does he remove the hat before
나는 희빈 장씨니라 꺄아하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하
what
Are you ok?
희빈장씨가 이런 음악을 들었구나
24:50
24:00