Scientific Shoulder Training
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 сен 2012
- The ultimate course on shoulder anatomy, function and corrective exercises for injury prevention, rehabilitation and optimal performance!
By Paul Chek, HHP, NMT
Based on 28-plus years of working with clients who have presented with all types of shoulder pain and injury, Paul Chek and physical therapist Suzi Nevell provide an in-depth, multifaceted approach to shoulder conditioning and integrated shoulder function. Using the Chek Success Formula, you will learn how to assess the shoulder complex, select the best exercises for each client and design programs to improve performance and decrease the risk of injury and chronic shoulder problems. In-depth instruction of correct techniques is given, plus corrective exercises, mobilizations and explosive training to enhance your exercise programs for all levels of patients, clients and athletes. This is must-have information for strength coaches, personal trainers, physical therapists and health and fitness professionals interested in the upper quarter of the body.
For more information on this course, please visit: www.dswfitness.com/ScientificS...
709 views!? Some of the most valuable rehab information available for FREE and noone has seen it!
Oh well all the better for me!
Awesome as always Paul :-)
I never say OMG, but OMG!!! This guy is speaking the truth that NOBODY wants to hear. Well, hearing it is ok but don't ask people to spend time working on the inner muscles that others can't see. People would rather look "Hot" or muscular and be chronically sore or getting hurt doing common daily life movements, than be functionally strong inside first, then blow up the outside while maintaining the inside. I don't have time for that. But yeah, I do have time to miss workouts due to injury and I don't mind my shoulder killing me when I move my arms or try to sleep. But hey, I look good, and that's what counts.......... right........RIGHT? This guy is fantastic. But notice the pathetic lack of LIKES or subscribers compared to the number of viewers. Sadly, people want to be lied to and told that they can be lazy and irresponsible in their eating and exercise and still look like the steroid freaks posing as "all naturals" . Sad.
really informative. gonna try as many of these out as i can
Wow, big big like! thank you very much... i really love it. how smart and wonderful you are and how lucky i am.😉😃
wow smart guy
Great Video. I am going to sign up for this course. Actually I am going to do all the Chek courses on the DSW website. Hey DSW fitness Is there any way to combine all of Check's ceu's into a certificate course so we can have a useful credential as well?
heh, its too dry for most ADD youtube users.
Who wears short shorts
He sure likes to SOUND smart... but I think there are some glaring assumptions being made here. Stretching chronically "tight" muscles before knowing what caused that tightness could be simply undoing the body's corrective strategy without having an adequate alternative. His "functional" bias carries through this a little too heavily, and I think he spits out a lot of game that sounds great until you analyze it a little more closely.
Chek knows just enough to sound like a genius to people who aren't terribly informed on the subjects of exercise physiology, biomechanics, and the neuromuscular system. Learn enough about how those systems really work, however, and you'll see where this is lacking. Paul believes what he's saying VERY emphatically, but some of his thought processes are simply flawed. Don't put this guy on too high of a pedestal. His certs certainly aren't worth the exorbitant costs (in my opinion, obviously).
What certs/who's information do you recommend studying?
raferskip I can only speak for myself and the experience that I've had. But in terms of really solid understanding of biomechanics, the Resistance Training Specialist (RTS) program is wonderful. I have a cert with them, and I'm also about to get certified through Muscle Activation Techniques (MAT), which is specifically dealing with identifying and correcting muscle imbalances through a systematic process. It doesn't rely on postual/gait analysis or assumptions that you would make from that. Instead it tries to do a better job of isolating the specific muscle or muscles that may be dysfunctional because of an issue with neural communication. It's sort of in between a "training" education and therapy. If you can afford it, it's awesome stuff.
I also hold a CPT cert through ACSM and my CSCS through the NSCA. Those have benefits of giving you more credibility in the mainstream, though the information you actually learn through those certs is of more limited use (in my humble observation). Hit me up if you have other questions. I'll gladly help where I can.
heard of functional patterns?
fasi smith -- If you're referring to Naudi Aguilar's stuff, then yes. I've heard of it, and I'm not impressed. I've interacted with Naudi (or at least tried to). The guy's an incredibly insecure egotist who doesn't know how to have a mature discussion or handle any criticism. He ridicules and bans anyone who question him on his Facebook page.
But more importantly, the entire premise (that you shouldn't do sagittal plane lifts or almost anything "conventional" because we didn't "evolve" for it, etc.) is fundamentally flawed. He has no evidence aside from a big helping of the naturalistic fallacy to support his assertion that we should do tons of rotational and wobbly circus acts in order to be healthy (whatever his definition of "healthy" might be).
He makes claims that more traditional (or simply "boring") exercises will somehow wreck your body that rely almost entirely on anecdotes and personal bias. For every good idea he might throw out, he has a dozen moronic ones tagging along for the ride. You can get better information from other places without the childish ego.
That's just my opinion, of course, but I'm not alone in these sentiments. I'd strongly recommend RTS over Functional Patterns. Every day.
Paul Chek has a saying "If you're going to pull your sword on a Samurai, you'd better know how to use it."
I'd love to hear you debate his methods with him, Geoff - it would make for a very interesting conversation, at the very least! :)