2 + 2 = 5 How | Breaking the rules of mathematics | Fun of Mathematics: Ep 1
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 авг 2024
- Prove that 2+2=5 | Breaking the rules of mathematics.
The one of the viral math equation is 2+2=5. It is not usual mathematical result that 2+2=5. However, it is easy to prove that 2+2=5. In this video, I show the solution of 2+2=5 through a funny viral math trick. Two plus two equals five is very common math trick, I am representing here in an attractive way of explanations. It is comparable to 0% financing on the car loan (don't take it seriously, I am kidding). I made this viral math equation and you try to find out where is the mistake in 2+2=5 math.
I am launching a new series of video related to mathematics by the playlist 'Fun of Mathematics'. Video related to funny mathematics related things will be uploaded on every Tuesday at 2 pm Central European time.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Watch other interesting videos on Matescium
Scientist measures the smallest of the smallest thin film by Spectroscopic Ellipsometers: • Measuring the smallest...
How Solar Panels Turn Sunlight into Electricity | Photoelectric Effect: • How Solar Panels Turn ...
Rare view of X-Ray gun | Expensive shiny polycrystal | Ferrofluid | Full HD (60 fps) : • Video
Levitating water experiment | Does all liquid stay in the upside down glass? : • Levitating water exper...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe to Matescium:
ruclips.net/user/c...
Overview of Matescium:
/ matescium
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#2+2=5 #MathTricks #ViralMath #2+2=5MathTrick #FunOfMathematics #2+2=5How #4+4=5How
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for watching it.
![Oasis - Oasis Live '25 [Official Trailer]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/gol_JnuEtKM/mqdefault.jpg)
I found a way to trap light in a mirror box. Check this exciting video here: ruclips.net/video/v45HhFV3h7Y/видео.html
How can u sepeate 4 and 5 from the equation i.e.(4x5)-(4x5)=(5x5)-(5x5)...here is the mistake
Correct
If u see this video then u will forgot ur mathematics
Hey man u can't cancel 0 with 0 remember that
0=0
10-10=100-100
(10-10)=10(10-10)
1=10
Kin kin logo ne ye video Bina search kiye Dekha hai 😂
Mene
Maine 😂
Muje bro
Mujhe
Me
4(5-5)=5(5-5)
4×0=5×0
0=0
There is the mistake
@@elangoelango3450 5-5 equal 0 bro😂😂
@@rwikhabasumatary8538 h
Yes you
Are Right😂😂😂😂
(5_5 ) 4 ka sath multiply ho raha tha jb (5_5 )dosri side pr jay ga to divide ho jay ga phir (5_5 ) cancel ho jay ga ga (5_5 ) or 1 ajay ga phir 4 =5 honjay ga
@@rwikhabasumatary8538 😅😅iM dead😂😂😂🤣🤣
@@maheenazhar8926 bracket first bro.... Woh Dono side pe cancel huaa. kuyki Woh divide tha each other.... So first bracket (which is minus) and divide next..... BODMAS rule is important even Einstein had used this formula
I DID IT RIGHT ( LIKE THE WAY YOU EXPLAINED ) AND IN RETURN THE TEACHER GAVE ME A GIFT OF 0 MARKS AND 2 THAPADD 😎😎😎
🕺🕺🕺
Speak in english so majority people understand ( I understood cz im indian)
You are the genius
@@ichigokurosaki5237 it's our Indian secret😉
@@ichigokurosaki5237 it's his choice btw I also like bleach
The problem is at 4(5-5) = 5(5-5). This is the same as 4(0) = 5(0), but canceling them out isn't something that you can do in this case. This is because dividing both sides by (5-5) would be the same as dividing by zero, since 5-5 = 0. When you divide by zero, any number can be equal to any other number.
😮😮
Exactly
According to his logic, 1=2=3=4=5...to infinity.
You can not divide 0 by 0 because it is not defined and therefore (5-5)/(5-5) cannot be divided. 2:34
Yes
Exactly you can't divide by zero.
This is a great video.
The mistake is in this step 4*(5-5)=5*(5-5)
In this step you just cancelled (5-5) which is equals to 0,so basically you are dividing both the sides by (5-5) which is equals to zero , which means you are doing 0/0 which is undefined, that's 2+2 doesn't equals to 5.
👍👍👍👍👍
Yeah I remember my teacher once saying
0x=0y
x=y
This is unacceptable as you can't multiply the numbers with 0 in rhs lhs type questions
Ya🧐
@ANGELIC_GAMER 😂
Sure,0÷0 is undefined
3rd and 4th class students be like : " So finally our maths teacher is wrong "
Lol true
Lol
🤣🤣
Lol🤣🤣🤣
@Joanna Cameron Netto lol kisi ko mat bolo
You have do the brackets before simplifying
4 (5 - 5) = 5 (5 - 5)
Now imagine transposing instead of cancelling
It will be division :-
4 = 5 [ (5 - 5) ÷ (5 - 5) ]
The thing that you are doing wrong is the order of operations that is the PEMDAS or BODMAS rule
Brackets come first
If they are done firts so :-
4 (5 - 5) = 5 (5 - 5)
Brackets will be simplified to make 0
So 4 × 0 = 5 × 0 = 0
Note : Another thing that is wrong especially for grade 5 and 6 students who might not know this
Brackets been done first and then division might cause this problem :-
4 (5 - 5) = 5 (5 - 5)
4 × 0 = 5 × 0
Now you might think we can divide 0 from both sides and get
4 = 5 × 0/0
So any number upon any number = 1
Same you will do with 0. So 0/0 = 1
4 = 5 × 1
This is clearly absurd because anything ÷ 0 is *Undefined*
U may also get
4 = 5 × 0/0
0/0 = 1/2
0/0 = 1/3
And so on with different fractions or rational numbers
This always gives absurd result
Waa
Ohh ohh oh my goddddddddd😮😮😮😮 math guru pranam🙏🙏🙏
Agahahah me v banungi ek din maths me aese 😂
4(5-5)=5(5-5)
Yes ,cancelling the
(5-5)we get 0 only not 1,multiply anything with 0 we get 0 only
Tnx
Even though it's so easy, it's probably because it's not taught properly in junior high school or high school classes that there are so many irrelevant comments.
LHS=4(5-5)=4(0)=0, RHS=5(5-5)=5(0)=0, so it is correct up to 4(5-5)=5(5-5) . Next, he made a mistake by dividing both sides by (5-5)=0. Both sides are in the state of "(non-zero numerical value) x 0 = 0". No matter what you multiply by 0, it will be 0, so this (non-zero numerical value) is also (a numerical value that can be anything). By dividing both sides by (5-5), the "0 part" disappears, leaving with "4" and "5" (which can be any numerical value). Thus, the strange "4=5" appears.
Thanks for your explanation!
You can't cut off (5-5) because it's already 0 .
If yes then anyone can write 1x0=100x0 and cut off 0 from both side then 1=100
This explanation is perfect
Yes because 0/0 is indetermined and he can't take 0/0 as 1......
wow
Basic Rule of match
You always suppose.
Seriously And people say Philosophers are Chaotic.😒
You are wrong
After watching this :
Me to my landlord : " come here "
"My monthly rent 9000 = 0 "
Better hope they don't understand the order of operations (pemdas) when you try to show them why you paid zero for rent.
🤣🤣🤣well said
😂😂😂
Did they agreed about this
@@user-pr8kv8nz8l yes surely 😂
@@majid1661 😂😂😂😂
2:29 Here is the Mistake
You have eliminated 5-5 which is literally 0...
You can never eliminate 0 from 0
If you do it it will be 0/0 which is not defined
Hence every laws of mathematics are as it is and you have broken that law to prove that...
Yes
Correct bro...
Yes you are correct
Yeah
@@paraskashyap4374 good job mate
2:27 Here the trick starts.
Nothing happens willy-nilly. And, I cannot remove anything from equation just because I think they should go away. There, we had to divide by common number to get rid of unnecessary numbers. For example, if I have an equation: (360-35)*6=(245+X)*6, then I can erase both 6s in both sides which literally means: I AM DIVIDING BOTH SIDES BY that number 6. So, I will have (360-35)=(245+X) left. However, in the video, they are dividing by (5-5) zero (0) which is nonsense, isn't it?. Dividing by zero the trick begins.
(Furthermore, in the beginning of the video he also said he was breaking the rules of maths.)
[Thanks!]
When cancelling 5 - 5 on both sides, you're essentially dividing both sides by 5 - 5. But thing is you can't divide by 5 - 5, cuz dividing by 0 ain't defined. Hence, cancelling 5 - 5 isn't possible. And thus, 4 not equal to 5. 🙂👐🏻
Nerdy alert
ok nerd
But isn't it really obv?
@@decentsanage6509 ohh yes we just joke why u serious 😑
@@Itz1y_cringe that statement wasn't for you
No, it's wrong.
We can't eliminate 0 just by cancelling it from both sides. The correct equation will be :
→ 4(5-5) = 5(5-5)
→ 4(0) = 5(0)
→ 4 × 0 = 5 × 0
→ 0 = 0
Hence, 4 ≠ 5, i.e, 4 is not equal to 5.
Right
👍 you're the 5% team member.
@@studycookingandfunwithgurk8351 Thanks
@@rizalditwo1550 Thanks
@@onlymazaat.v1680 Thanks
When I told this trick to my teacher he deducted my five marks in maths and convert into 2+2
by this I got 4 marks 😂
Lol
Lol
mcnf m,./
😂
🤣🤣
This is more difficult than algebra 😂😂😂
Exactly 😅😅
its not
Mathematics has its complete rules
2:30 you cannot eliminate(cancel out) zero by zero🤷🤷
That is 5-5 cannot be cancelled by 5-5 as both are zero🤦🤦
And 0 ÷0 is not defined 😁😁
Here it is where you made the mistake 👍👍👍
It's right
💯
Oh genius👍👌
@@poyi.kedann.orangada good brain🙄
😶 yeah right
The equation is that 4 (5-5) = 5 (5-5)
4 (0) = 5 (0)
When we open the bracket then,
4 x 0 = 5 x 0
0 = 0
This is wright
Are Bhai 5-5 ko left side laoge to wo divide ho Jayega aur 1 aayega
@@a2motivationsuper.1.5m7 ok 4(0)=5(0) is (0) ko left side le jao or 1 bna do
Are Mai keh Raha hu ki 5-5 ko left side laoge to 5-5 se divide ho Kar 1 aayega aur 4*1=4 Hota hai 4=5
This is right
Guy: let's prove 2+2=5
Pen: No.
0:36
Mathematician socked
RUclipsr rocked 😂🤣😂
You Can't Cancel (5-5) from Both Side,Cause Canceling means Division and Anything Divide By Zero is Infinite.
Undefined it is😂
Yes bro
True 💯
TRUE
❌
4(5-5)=5(5-5)
4×0=5×0 (Applying BODMAS rule, first of all we solve bracket)
So, 0=0.
👍👍👍
Well
Right
S
Op right
The video makes me Albert Einstein. 😂😂😂
Its make you think you are albret Einstein
WTF
Well I saw this guy is in Germany and Albert Einstein is German
are you a fool??
@@akshatbhatter178 for this question I feel you are a fool .
He wants to prove 2+2= 5 and wrote 4 as 2+2. Wow 👏👏
you wrote it as 2+2 too
@@azur7362 💀
This is how I attempt my whole question paper of Maths.
😂😂😂
Lol
Same
🤣🤣♥️
I know the mistake it will be that 0 cant be cut in lhs and rhs as 0/0 is not defined
If we subtract (5-5) , It must be the problem :
4*(5-5) = 5*(5-5)
4*(0) = 5*(0)
0 = 0
Very nicely done with the wrong part 😄 😅
A video to make Einstein wake up from his grave
@@t_h_f7931 😂
@@t_h_f7931 ahahaha
Exactly, he breaks the order of operations or pemdas.
4*(5-5)/(5-5) = 5*(5-5)/(5-5)
While the above is true, it must be evaluated like so according to pemdas.
4*0/0 = 5*0/0
0/0 = 0/0
0=0
@@johngardner5169 absolutely
*BODMAS
Now, This is the true example of "*An Idle mind is the devil's workshop.*"
🔥🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Yesss
@strawberry pup no his mind is universe of devil
hehehehehhahahhahahhehehhehhahahahahhahahhahaahhahahahahahhehehhehehehhehehehehehehhehehehehhehehehehehehehehhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahheheheheehhehehehehehhehehehehehehhhehhehehehhehhehehehheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhheehehhehhehehehehehehehehehehehehehhehehehehehehehhehehhehehhehehehehhehehhhehehhehehehhehehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...
If this was real math counting would be a monster
HERE IS THE MISTAKE : IN bodmas we have to first solve the bracket number and then others and you did wrong here:
4×(5-5) = 5×(5-5)
Here you have to first solve the bracket ....
Correct way is like this :
4×(5-5) = 5x(5-5)
4×0 = 5×0
0=0
Hence proved !!!!
CHALO BYEEE GUYS THANKS FOR READING MY COMMENT .....
Lots of love FROM India...
Same to u broo..! 😁
He said by braking maths rule he proved that 2+2=5... so there is no mean to apply bodmas rules .so please take your words back
DESIIIIII
@@diyabeniwal606 but there was a mistake so i guess we could apply bodmas rule
lol this is a goddamn meme
Because cancelling a number on both sides is not really a thing.
It actually means dividing a number on both sides and you CAN'T divide anything by 0.
Yea
Right.
Me😂
I was about to answer the same
Bohot Gyan hain tumhare paas, IIT hogaya kya clear??
Who came from beluga video 😅??
me lol
me too lol
Pythagoras and other mathematician after seeing this video --isk to game bajana padega 😂😂
According to BODMAS Rule you have to solve brackit first so,
4(5-5)=5(5-5)
4×0=5×0
0=0
Yes
He divided both sides by (5-5) in the vid and this is an error, he wrote the value of 0/0 as 1, this is wrong. The prove by this guy is wrong.
At 4×0=5×0, he can still cancel 0 and 0 on both sides of the equation and prove 4=5 😉😉..and in that case even such long procedure isn't needed. Actually 0 and 0 can't be cancelled.
@@ishansh0077 I was going to write the same 😂
Dude or u can cancel LHS and RHS (5-5) So u get 4=5.What u did was also correct but u can use distributive property or the method which I have explained now.
According to the BODMAS rule, we should calculate the 'Brackets' first which would mean 4 (5-5) = 5 (5-5) will result in 4 (0) = 5 (0) and consequently, the answer will be 0 = 0.
You are a real genius
@@advikpatil4163 Thanks bro :)
Kuch bhi the real answer should not be this
It should be like this 4×0=5×0 so u can cut the zero but actually it's you equate any number using this so u cant use zero so this is wrong
i think its right
2:50 this shows how much he truly enjoys and loves mathematics:)
5-5 is actually 0. When you are eliminating 5-5 on both sides, you are actually dividing one with the other. And 0 divided by 0 is actually infinity. So LHS =4 x infinity which is infinity and so for the RHS.
Yes you are correct ✅
Your reasoning is incorrect . 0/0 is not infinity it's actually 1/0 (but this is a concept of physics) . Anything divided by 0 is not defined in mathematics . Even calculator knows that
This is wrong . Correct explanation is that in fourth line you had break the rule . That is first we have to solve the bracket then we can divide. I am saying about the rule of BODMAS .
Hope you understand .
0 over 0 is not infinity. It is not defined. Dividing by zero is just not defined. It is not infinity. Both the things are different.
Agree with your logic,,,,this is the only reason why this type of result has come,,, that result is totally wrong where he cancelled 5-5 from both sides
2:54 *"I made a very clever mistake"*
Engineering students : "Yes it was very clever"
True💯😂
@@adityaamodkar6715 LOL
2:54
Forget Maths, I've never seen anyone writing "S" like that... 😂
Like this
You cannot cross out (5 - 5) and (5 - 5) because 0 cannot be divided by 0 and crossing out literally means turning them into 1 by dividing. 0 divided by 0 gives math error as the result can be anything from 0 to infinity. Hence 0 divided by 0 is not accepted in mathematics.
Me seeing this before one day of my maths test and getting even more confuse
😆😆😆
Yeah me too
Bruh same here... I bet u searched for how to eliminate options in mcqs
😅🤣🤣
😂😂
You solve this question through BODMAS
so in bodmas you first evaluate / simplify the brackets (in this case it would be 5-5=0)
and then divide.
So here's the mistake
I don't understand anything you say
@@sanasamkheroda3192 bruda he is saying 5-5 =0 and he cut 5-5 with 5-5 which means he is deviding 0/0 which is not defined 😉😉
I ALREADY KNEW THIS TRICK😀😀😎
But where is divide step
@@sanasamkheroda3192 I think u don't know basic math
What was he saying in this video I don't get anything
Rules of mathematics be like: Humari taraf toh koi dekhta hi nahi..😜😂
Sahi kaha bhai lekin phir bhi meri maths thodi to acchi hai 9th class me hu
@@nehaparveen3460 bhai 10th to maths me in genius that men bhi 11th me in mat lena chahe kuch ho jay
@@corpster_gaming8621 11th ki maths easy hai 10th ke maths se 😅
@@nehaparveen3460 not at all.. 😅
@@priyankagoswami7018 mujhe easy hi lagi 😊
There's a pretty mistake in proof. You can't eliminate 0s if they are common on both sides .
If you cancel any real no. by eleminating them. It means you are sending the number from one hand to another for division
ab=ad
b=d. [b=ad/a]
but if you divide the value from 0 the value gets undefined. So the moment you eleminated 0s, value on either side got undefined
0÷0 is a indeterminate form.
So we can't multiply or divide by zero on either sides of an equation.
So you can't cancel 0 on either sides and that is a mathematics rule which you didn't follow.
Even my maths teacher had taught us it in his first class to make the class interesting
☺
but he already said in the title 'breaking math's rules'
Yaa bro I too taught in same way but. Don't know how to say 📚📚
33+33×33-33÷0= ɪɴғɪɴɪᴛʏ
@@maavezali4428 then its not maths any more. u can break rule by saying 1+1=11
Exactly ...I am just cheking in the comments whether anyone has picked up this point
Albert Einstein wants to know his location
Einstein and hawking came in my dream and said that
This is the reason why we died
4(5-5) 5(5-5)
= 4×0 5×0
=0-0
=0.
Here is the mistake
Germany
India
@@softstack978 Not India
Taki woh uske ghar aakar maare 😂😂
At the third line,
4(5-5)=5(5-5),
The rule is to clear(5-5)
So it is. 4(5-5)=5(5-5)
=4(0)=4(0) :).
=0=0
i know you r smart freash gamer
😂😂
@@AK-gd7vo why did you laugh?
@@BlakeB7002 because you are praising yourself. 🤣🤣🤣
@@AK-gd7vo 😁😁😁😁😁😂😂😂
My mom says I should respect everyone's opinions.
Their opinions:
Loooooool fucking cool one
@Maths by Mehra sorry I don't understand, speak English please
@SSC Maths I understand
@@arashghasemzadeh2219 r bhai tu बालक है😂😂😂
@@chandrakala840 English or Persian dude
A genius is a man who can make complex things simple, not simple things complex.
Correct
Yes
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤭🤗🤗💯
4:24 I can't stop my laugh on his laugh its soo funny 🤣
From 4(5-5)=5(5-5), one cannot simply "cancel out" the 5*5 to deduce that 4=5.The reason is that both sides of the equation are equal to 0, and you cannot deduce any new equivalences between numbers from an equation that states that 0 equals 0.
on the 3rd step 4(5-5) = 5(5-5) You need to find whats inside the brackets first and then only eliminate if there are common values according to PEMDAS/BODMAS rules. If you apply that rules, You will get 4(5-5) = 5(5-5) => 4(0)=5(0) => 0=0
Another method:
2(antilog/10) + 2(antilog/10) = 3.169.
10Log 3.169 = 5.
The calculation works where the numbers being added are logarithmic. An example of a logarithmic number is the decibel (dB).
So: 2 dB + 2 dB = 5 dB
It just the 4 = undefined in that situation ie, 0/0.
It's not PEDMAS it's PEMDAS
@@bholukumar5956 yeah mb
Bro is right
My math teacher resigned from his job after watching this 😂
Deep condolences to u and ur kindergarten teacher😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂
Our maths teacher is going to confuse ..That from where we are learning this unique😂
Yes
True tho
Yes
@Sunita Gupta yes, he is breaking the rules of maths. He said it himself
Karena anda awalnya mengambil persamaan bilangan 0 = 0, persamaan bilangan ini akan selalu seperti itu baik ruas kiri dan ruas kanan akan tetap nilainya 0 jika dikalikan atau dibagi dengan "sembarang bilangan yang lebih besar 0"
This is how students defend them self before teacher even though they have written wrong answer is the exam 😂😂
🤣🤣
Absolutely wrong method. Itis not correct
Lol 😂
The teachers should be fired because the students are always right 😃
Ya yesterday my teacher explained that "a sentence can never be true and false both" , then maine jaher ka ghut piya aur aaj subah me hi search kiya "proof 2+2 =5" aur sirji ka popat karne ka socha 😂. But unhone bola "Get out of the class "
When you eliminated (5-5) you're basically just making the lhs=(5-5)/(5-5)
Since 5-5 is zero and anything divided by zero is undefined, you can basically prove anything with the help of this
Not possible
Ishaan gupta...is correct
According to Bodmas , firstly we have to solve brackets and in this situation in lhs (5-5)/(5-5) we have to solve brackets first and its next situation is 0/0 and u can divide the zero with zero and its answer is 0 1,2,3,,,
I think his mistake is that why he choose the rhs 25-25 not 20-20
@Social distancing no bro its serious matter he breaks the rules of maths it is very unsatisfied
Finally, I found a guy! Who can give me 5 lakh rupees instead of 2 lakh + 2 lakh. 😂😂
✌
किन किन लोगो ने ये विडियो बिना सर्च किये देखा है pls five like 👍 only
Sir , First you have to multiply the number that are inside of the bracket like this 4(5-5)= 5(5-5)
20 -20 = 25 - 25
0=0 Hence, it proved 😊
Hi
Bhai ghum phir k wohi hua is equation me apne ko sare numbers common milenge
Yes. You can also subtract the number inside the branket/parentheses first and still get the same.
4(5-5) = 5(5-5)
4×0 = 5×0
0 = 0
Wa bete moj kar de🤣
this applies when you have to solve, he is expanding
4(5-5)=5(5-5)
4=5(5-5)/(5-5)
Here is the mistake because (5-5)=0 and 0/0 it is not possible so (5-5)/(5-5) is not possible
Then we must do ..........................
4(5-5)=5(5-5)
4*0=5*0
0=0
This is the right calculation 👍👍👍👍👍👍
Yes.
According to me, if we will simplify the (5-5),it would be 0. Equation is
4 x 0 = 5 x 0
Now we cannot cancel 0 on both sides. If we do so, then equation would be
(4 x 0) /0 = 5
Dividing any number by 0 is infinity or not defined. That is why it's disobeying the rules of mathematics
Then 0 never equal to 5 0=5 will come by your equation😜🤣😂
But there 5 and 4 are in multiplication so you can't cut 5-5 and 4-4
@@shilpabhosle7618 just simplify it🙂
Yaa that is my answer
True
You cannot cancel similar terms on both sides where numbers are present
In algebra you can only cancel similar terms on both sides when you have common variables
For example,
( a + b )(a + b) = (a + b )( a - b )
=(a+b) = (a-b)
lol no thats not true
The mistake is in this step 4*(5-5)=5*(5-5)
In this step you just cancelled (5-5) which is equals to 0,so basically you are dividing both the sides by (5-5) which is equals to zero , which means you are doing 0/0 which is undefined, that's 2+2 doesn't equals to 5.
You're correct.👍
U are not correct because if there are numbers same on both sides then u can cut each of them if it equals to 0 still u can cut it
Exactly 💯
@@Killerking_plays agree
@@Killerking_plays proud of your knowledge
The dislikes are only from math teachers
😂😂
Nope
You're right 😂
സത്യം 😁
@@funworld2969 ok da😊
My friends almost killed me when I proved this to them 🤣
Sir Mistake done by you is 5-5=0 then multiply by L.H.S 4 *0 = R.H.S 5*0 then 0=0.Threfore you cannot strike out directly( 5-5) on both sides
0:46 that's my math level
0:28 is the mistake
Because,
4(5-5) = 5(5-5)
4(0) = 5(0)
4×0 = 5×0
0 = 0
But not,
2+2 = 5
Sorry it is 1:28
Qqq
No Please Demotivate Yourself You Can Be A Mathematician Too
Your mistake
When you eliminate the similar term on both side you divide by zero. That is not allowed. You can eliminate the term only when they are different of zero.
Wve the best way for you and I will🖤🖤🖤🖤🤲
Rrrrrrrrrrrrr the best way to get the best way to get the latest version for you and I b Etty the best way for me to get 🖤
If non-zero
Actually it is defined in math u can't cancel 0 on both sides
4(0)=5(0),
U can cancel a non zero number which has a multiple on the other side of the equation
By doing so it creates inequality ...
Yeah!! This is correct
S , very good😜👍
No actually he is not cancelling zero he is actually using 5 (5-50 and 4 (5-5) to cancel it
(5-5)*
@@devanshrastogi167 hey what is 0/0 ,undefined right....
How will you cancel it....
It is a mistake there....
Oh, I figured it out. This helped explain it, thanks 😊
For anyone who doesn’t know; 4(5-5) = 5(5-5) is correct, but is the same as 0 = 0. By removing the (5-5) from the equation, the result was changed to 4 = 5. He removed the part where 4 & 5 are multiplied by 0. The real answer is; 4(5-5) = 5(5-5), 4(0) = 5(0), 4 = 5.
here you take :
=>20-20=25-25
=>(4*5)-(4*5)=(5*5)-(5*5)
=>4(5-5)=5(5-5)
here you cancelled out (5-5) from both side but this not valied due to BODMAS.... DMAS rule of mathamethics here first you have to solve in the bracket than comes on multiplication but you directly cancelled out (5-5) which is the mistake
@Narut0 what
He did according to indicies rule maybe but you can't do this in mathematics, you're right
LOL, it's valid.. Only this which is not valid is division by zero.. Zero by Zero is undefined.. not 1 😂
Exactly....you are right friend
Exactly
Here,
⇨ 4(5-5) = 5(5-5)
⇨4*0=5*0
⇨ 0=0
So, 2+2= 5 isn't possible....
@@Aqdas_khan I think you don't have simple common sense it's correct and even small kids can understand this first strengthen up your basics and stop playing games or else you will suffer in maths in higher class or if u don't take maths after 10th physics is also there don't forget it🤣
@@HarshithJEE absolutely
He don't even know BODMAS
@@omkondawar5899 yes they are all brainless people
We have to solve bracket first
the mistake is that we first will solve bracket (5-5)=0
Mistake is that after cutting 5-5 from both sides 0 remains in both sides and in LHS 4*0=0 and in RHS also 5*0=0 so again 0=0 remains..
Everyone : "This is right" , "This is wrong"
Me: Why have he tagged Germany?
Me too
Right 😂😂🤣
Right 👍
@@sunnydaylol931 ur name lol!
@@mahii.27 it is what it is 😌
And that's why BODMAS was invented....
Solve bracket first (5-5)=0;
Hence; 4(5-5)=5(5-5)
4×0=5×0;
So,0=0
@jakaria khan Khan BODMAS = FIRST SOLVE BRACKET,THEN OF,THEN Division ,then multiplication,and then add and subtract...
So first solve the brackets ( ) not the division part ...
Friend
@@agastyaojha7167 Exactly! It's the order of operations that has been violated.
You cut the (5-5) with (5-5) means 5-5 is equal to 0 and you can't be cut 0 with 0 so here you did the mistake 🤙☺️
then 4(0)=0
5(0)=0 Hence proved
@@mrakshith346 👍
Buddy there was a number before bracket so it means you should multiply the number with that number your method is wrong
Not zero it's 1
@@pramodh1112 how?
So what you did here
0=0
20-20=25-25
(4×5)-(4×5)=(5×5)-(5×5)
Now you have to follow PEMDAS first solve the brackets and then the exponents what you did was this:
4(5-5)=5(5-5)
4=5 This is the mistake
2+2=5
This is how you actually do it:
4(5-5)=5(5-5)
4(0)=5(0)
0=0
2+2 ≠5
Here according to BODMAS
brackets are solved earlier then divisions
Hence here before eliminating (5-5).... U must have to solve it first as it is in the bracket
Yeah same
Yep bro 👍
I thought the same
I actually did this at school and everyone was staring at me like I am Einstein 🤣🤣
Genious how much hours dis it take for u to write it down
@@luvminjeon9319 🤣🤣
😂
You have not followed the rule of (bodmas)
4(5-5) = 5 (5-5)
4×0 = 5×0
0 = 0
You have not done(skipped) this step
Tor matha
Attendence of 3rd and 4th class students..😂
(9th class student got responsibility) 5:12
There is a mistake , 0 and 0 cannot be cancelled in this way , bcz from here an other equation satisfy i.e - undefined=undefined , which is not possible , and which is one of the greatest saying against the constitution of mathematics, 😂😂😂🤣🦆🦆 . Your prove is wrong , in this way we can say anything=anything 🤣🤣,
This video is more of philosophy that it is of mathematics ,😂😂😂🤣🦆🤣🤣 , however good . It was a good try...
Yeah i caught this too
Btw video was nice
I also found it
Yeah I also found the same mistake
😂 😂 😂(5-5) / (5-5) = 0/0.... That's the mistake here 😂 😂 😂 because they can't cancel out each other... Because 0/0=~~infinity....
Correct
Sir ...i only hs pass but i think....4(5-5)=5(5-5)
4×0=5×0
0=0
Correct
Right
You firs solve in brackets before proceeding.
Yes bhayya he is too silly
Absolutely right
Yes I catched
the mistake, since zero is multiplying on both sides it is not to be cancelled out, because
4*0=5*0
4=5*0/0
4=5*(0/0)
Here zero by zero value is un determined, but not '1',
So zeros (4-4, 5-5) are not to be cancelled since on division (0/0) it gives many values(since it is an undeterminate form) not only one.
The numbers are only cancelled out which gives value one on division.
🙏
wrong
So clever
Right
@@dalvanokemwa2530 how, can I know?...
Yes its absolutely right
0/0is not equal to 0
Using 2+2=4 for proving it equal to 5, LOL😂
Rip BODMAS 😥
Edit-: OMG so many likes...power of BODMAS😂
😅
@@saraannmathew3934 😂😁
@@saraannmathew3934 nice to meet u
Pemdas /bodmas
@@AlAarafZahanhiii
By dividing (5-5) on both sides you basically converted what was supposed to be 0/0 into 1. Also according to bodmas you should subtract 5-5 first and then do division afterwards
Ya it's correct 😊
yes this is what i thought too
Sameee 👍
No according to bodmas dividion done firtctgen subtraction should be done
@@jitkeleng736 according to BODMAS whatever is in the bracket is solved first
You should follow bodmas rule where you should work on small bracket on first 5(5-5)=4(5-5)=4 x 0 =5 x 0 which is 0=0
Nah!!!! If he used bodmas than the prove be wrong ❌
Yeah😂😂
Yes
me nepali too
@@ItsMyOpinionDude no it’s actually correct Bcs 4(5-5)=5(5-5)
=
4X(5-5)=5X(5-5)
= =
0 0
Which is => 0=0
=> 0+0=0
So yeh I’m correct and he’s incorrect:)
Well,
(5-5) = 0 and since anything multiplied with 0 is equal to 0. So, 4 and 5 must multiply with 0 respectively, which will be 0.
Thus, 4(5-5) = 5(5-5) = 0
Stick is that you need to solve the bracket first, we cannot cut the bracket directly
4 (5-5)= 5(5-5)
4*0 = 5*0
0 = 0
Even if we solve the bracket we will get
4=5
= 2+2=5
This is not the mistake
They cannot take 5 out of bracket.i think that is wrong
Tanks
he is using distributive property
@@vijoythomas3934 u cnnot cut it by brackrtly.....
U said 2+2=5....no how it comes...
4(5-5)=5(5-5)
4*0=5*0
0=0....
HW u said that it is right
Correct
According to BODMAS rule u cannot solve the equation without first solving whats inside the bracket !
That implies 4(5-5)=5(5-5)
4(0)=5(0)
0=0
Ankeet Panda yah open bracket first....
No bro it can be as it is not necessary in multiplication
No,first open the bracket by multiple the words into the bracket
Pemdas
Yehi misttake h
Math Teacher: You, what is 2 + 2?
Me: I'm about to end this mans whole career.
I regret wasting my time watching this nonsense..
The mistake is 4 (5-5) = 5 (5-5) you canclled (5-5) it equals 0 you divides both of sides to 0❤❤❤
U can't cancel zero by zero.
It's called INDITERMINATE FORM..
Here lies the mistake
Yeah man that's it
Yes true
You just indirectly said 2+2 is 4 in your last step. 😂😂 omg how i ended up here while preparing for my exam FML 😭
Very Good Observation 👍👍👍
Ami Here too omo
I SWEAR ARMY ARE EVERYWHERE😭
My exam is 2 morrow
That also maths
Me asking my mathematic teacher how much 2+2 he said 4 me wrong and showing him this video to 😂😂Omg he was gonna kill me
😂😄😂😂
🤟🏻
😂😂😂
You are lying and this equation is stupid
True nabin
My brain in not working anymore when I see this math 😅😅😅😅😅😅
The wrong thing is zeroes can't be cancelled on both sides since anything multiplied by zero will be a zero.