My ex never wanted me spending money on musical instruments. She wanted to go on trips. She cheated on me and left me for that guy. Best thing that ever happened to me. Now i have a home studio and wall full of guitars😁
@@smithlee8396 guitar is our soul speaking out loud when we play it, my friend. Let all our worries and angst, our fun and joy always sing out through our beloved guitars.
Depending on where you live. I am from EU and here an american PRS or a true LP from Gibson is simply unaffordable for my financial disposition. Even the korean made PRS are above my pay grade. I go with Squiers and Harley Benton thats my price category. ;-)
@@panama1942 Problem is even if I save all my guitars money I woudnt get one Fender for it here in my country, not even a used one. Prices are way beyond what you would think. Your advice sadly doesnt hold any water here. ;-)
There's nothing wrong with a Squier, buddy. We all get caught up in the gear, but it's really just about the music. I've got high and low end guitars. I play like crap on all of them.
My sentiment exactly! I have both (Standard and McCarty). Custom 24 is in my future too as well as another LP (R9 burst you are calling my name 😉). Love your playing as always Darrell! God bless.
lewisbeeman - nothing lost in playing different models. People forget that it's not just the money of buying and selling guitars, it's the experiences and memories you create that really matter. Tell yourself it's OK to pay "Rent" on guitars you want to resell after a couple years. It's really cheap enjoyment regardless.
jonas brave although I agree with your overall statement, I am not for making payments on a guitar. Cash or nothing for me. I’ve had expensive stuff that I wasn’t in love with. I’ve play “budget” guitars I’ve loved and vice versa. Currently because I am a college student, on a tighter budget, I am interested in building from scratch and fixing up cheaper stuff. I have found great enjoyment building them. And I also like the reward of having a killer guitar with Squier on the headstock.
Which flagship guitar was your favorite? To my ear the LP Standard had a sort of raw or "rough around the edges" bite, while the PRS CU24 was balanced and composed in every scenario thrown at it :) Les Paul: imp.i114863.net/Yeq2B PRS: imp.i114863.net/Yeq2B
Darrell Braun Guitar Often imitated, never duplicated, there’s just something about the Les Paul. That raw, rough around the edges bite just does it for me. Although the PRS does have a great sound.
Darrell Braun Guitar I’ve got to agree, to my ear the PRS was warmer sounding, a rounder feel to it. I love both but the PRS is my personal favorite. BTW, thanks for the Southern Rock feel tonight.
love the sounds that are possible from each of these. However, the PRS gold top is not something that would shout out to me "Hey! pick me up and give me a go." well played regardless.
I've always loved a good Les Paul. But when I got my first really high-end PRS I noticed that when playing live it kind of just disappeared and felt like the music just showed up automatically. There's still a bite and sound quality to a less Paul that really can't be replicated, but a good PRS is so much more stable and reliable and has a higher playability it's really tough to beat.
Darrell would you comment please on what you think about open chords on the two guitars? I thought while listening that the LP went a little sour more because of tuning than pickups and construction. Great video both very beautiful and desirable instruments, thanks!
I've had a PRS in mind for a while, the build quality looks another level however in this video the Les Paul tone is hands-down the winner for me in all but the bridge pick up dirty where I'm equally thrilled. So I'm a bit deflated now, both stunning to look at, thanks for posting.
You need to try a 594 McCarty with 58/15lt pickups. The 57/09 pickups are supposed to be close to Gibson, but the high end PRS guitars…$4k+ are amazing
Yep everytime I read comments people convince me I want a tele or a higher end PRS. But everytime I watch videos and hear the tones, it’s always a LP I seem to want most. Same with a bass. Everyone convinced of a P or Jazz Bass but everytime I hear a video of tones, it’s always a MM Stingray I enjoy the most. Trust your ears.
I prefer the feel of a PRS more than a Les Paul, it feels like I have to fight against Les Pauls to play them which some people prefer, but not me. The PRS is more suited to modern players for sure.
I bought Paul’s Guitar yesterday in Honey Color. It’s amazing...I also have the Tremonti which I love. My Gibson LP is cool though and I don’t hate on it by any means. I find myself gravitate towards the PRS though....just beautiful guitars.
I have both guitars. The PRS has the best tuning stability of any guitar I've played. The Gibson struggles in that category, but the scale length on a Gibson is just so easy to play compared to anything else. The PRS has amazing clean tone and the build quality is better than a Les Paul standard in my opinion. Both are great guitars, but I like my PRS better.
The playing feel and snap / aggressiveness of the LP aren't exactly replicated by PRS. It's slicker but a bit too refined for its own sake no matter how you dig in.
That surprised me... The LP had a lot of clarity in all 3 positions that that PRS didn't seem to have. The pickups in the LP are def interesting. Great A/B video.
Agree. Both sounded great, but to my ears the LP had a lot more clarity, while the PRS just came off a tad muddier. I'd be happy with either in my arsenal!
I’d say it’s a tie between the custom 24 and telecaster, but kind of in different ways. If you like that little bit more of a les Paul feel to your tone go custom 24, want that fender twang side of the spectrum? Go tele.
@@RUARI-mi1yt both are great in their own right, coming from a builders perspective. PRS makes great guitars, however the telecaster has been and will likely always be one of the highest sold and recorded guitars out there. I like a variety, imo it’s another voice you’re just choosing to miss out on.
I have both guitars, PRS is the most versatile and sounds almost as good as Gibson. I met Paul Reed Smith in 1977 thru my roommate in college, his younger brother Charlie.
I have 4 SE's with a new compensated nut (a must if you ask me...the neck is pretty much perfectly in tune everywhere) and seymore duncans and locking tuners....and you HAVE to change the bridge.....so the SE will set you back about $3-400....$300 worth of electronics and a couple hours work and you really have a nice guitar that if stolen won't make you cry for a year. Every one of mine sets up great and plays every bit as good as a core if you ask me. The Floyd Rose has a bit of a hard time staying perfectly in tune but if it's set up right it's not that bad. Lessons learned.....I have a traditional pro LP and love it too...but it will make you stand crooked from the weight but I love it too. ALL of which are blacked out in every way.....sorry...fetish
A great compliment to a LP is a PRS CE22. The snap of the maple is really nice if you already have a LP. Seek one out that's used and from the previous generation (pre 2010 or thereabouts). The new version has a thinner top, shallow bevel carve and the neck is 3 piece flat sawn with a scarf joint. The old ones had a half inch top, full violin carve and a straight grain quarter sawn neck.
I see no reason why you can't have one of each. They are all very different instruments. I've been in the mindset of cleaning house and selling all my OK guitars with the goal of getting one great one. I have a great Les Paul. Now I need that great Strat. Will also be looking into PRS for those situations when I need versatility.
I own both (though my 2017 PRS has the 85/15s) and this is a debate every time I go to practice. The LP sounds more authentic to me for classic rock, but overall I prefer the clarity and chime of the PRS. The PRS also sounds way better in the split modes (I LOVE position 4) than the LP.
That gold top on the PRS is beautiful but what’s even more gorgeous is the epic flame maple underneath. Some people converted their gold top les Paul’s from the mid fifties to a burst because they had such vibrant flame maple caps on them and everybody was chasing the “burst guitar” look.
When talking Les Paul vs everything else. Even the cheapest les paul will produce this classic thick tone that we know and love. Other guitars don't have this distinctive sound. Les paul tone is great thats why anyone wants a les paul but as a main guitar for me its a no. First of all the LP shape is great to look at but not that comfortable and second of all the thickness of the LP tone will allow for nothing less than that. The PRS is way more versatile way more proper for the player (as far as comfort is concerned) and some argue that it's better built with better intonation. For a main guitar the PRS is yes yes even the SE models are great, the LP is a great guitar to have just not as a main one. My personal opinion
Nail on the head. For a stage guitar where the last 5% of sound is not as crucial as staying in tune, being comfortable and having a wang-bar if you want it - the PRS wins. Other than the presence of that classic outline of the binding that is visible from 200 yds away, the LP has no big advantage on stage. But man.... when you need that classic blast of chunky rhythm in a tune...that attitude....nothing beats the LP, imho. Not even close. An LP to me is like Paul Bunyan just tore a piece of a tree off and nailed some strings to the resultant log - just to whack you in the face with it - beautifully.
Very interesting comparison, and once again my expectations were busted. For perhaps the first time in a PRS - LP shootout, the PRS came out on top for me. I've always felt the PRS guitars sounded thin and kind of one-dimensional. Not so for this test. Good job, Darrell. P.S. I love the looks of both the Gibson and the PRS... but I'm still a Strat guy.
I’ve got both but no that’s not true. You have to compare it to a “good” Gibson though. I admit they’re not all up there but once you get ahold of a good Gibson it is all a matter of choice. For me I like one for a while than I like the other one for some time. It always changes.
Also my favorite prs guitar is a custom 22 actually a p22 (custom 22 with a piezo pickup and dual outputs). I like the neck pup way more on a 22fret prs.
MrEkin03 - agree that 22 frets are better than 24 frets for neck pickup tone. Plus there's just less wood carved away around the neck join. Hell Yngwie plays only 21 fret necks, so fellas don't be afraid to do some work for your notes.
Used to own a LP. Now there are 3 PRS's in its place. I run with several different bands and their lead players always ask me to bring one of the PRS's for them to play. It is very noticeable when the PRS is singing versus when they are playing a tele, strat or LP. The other part of that is when the people in the audience make comments on the same subject. There are many very good sounding guitars out there but PRS has just seemed to step in front of most others now days. More and more players are moving to PRS. Sound and build quality of PRS speaks volumes and people are taking note. Great video comparison by the way.
they sounded more similar at the neck position, but the LP rang thru louder and crisper at the bridge, (with my headphones and settings anyway!) That PRS sure was smooth tho. I have lower end LP and PRS guitars similarly priced to each other and different in tone & feel, but pretty equal in quality. I think you've inspired me to do my own test just for myself!
I have owned a few Les Pauls and 2 PRS (CE22 & CU24). I love my Les Paul especially on classic rock numbers but whenever I plug in the PRS it’s like a Hi-Fi version of humbuckers. The clarity is just insane and I sometime really think the PRS could be that one guitar if my life depends on it (they are really like Swiss army knife type of guitar as they do Strat sounds super convincingly too!). If you can afford both then you definitely should
Listening to this, I was surprised that I clearly preferred the LP. Its tone has a subtlety and complexity that is strangely missing in the PRS. The PRS has a warmer, fatter sound and may cut through a bit more, but it's not singing like the LP. Maybe I'm missing something, but there are countless guitars out there that sound just like the expensive PRS. Or at least the one being played here. It lacks a distinctive character. Of course, it's got the more ergonomic shape. Wish Gibson did something on this front.
Respectfully disagree with the cons of the LP. I personally love my LP in my lap, and I just don’t ever feel as though it is difficult to reach high up the board, or anything that seems difficult to me. I do enjoy the reduced weight of the PRS, and I love the tone of both. I feel that both are a great playing experience not just the PRS. Just me I guess. Awesome video!
Darrell, either one of these would be welcome in my home! Both beautiful and they sound really full-throated. Given Gibson's reported quality issues lately I think I'd likely lean towards the PRS.
Hi David, I've played but not owned a Gibson guitar. I have several friends who bought Gibson over the past couple of years and they have had some issues. Still, if someone gave me one for Christmas I wouldn't be unhappy :-)
I do agree in part that Gibson's QC problems are overstated but that doesn't mean they match up to PRS standards either. The thing with PRS is that they are incredibly consistent, try one and you have tried them all, inspect one and you have inspected them all - they are so consistent that you can buy online and get what you expect without having to inspect or try. With Gibson, there is a greater range within the same model. Of course a LOT are great, with very little issues at all (other than those typically associated with LP's like tuning stability thanks to the break angle at the headstock), but there are a number with 'quality' issues too - some very minor like stain bleeding into the binding to glue not being cleaned properly around the neck joint, to more 'major' issues like a gap at the neck joint. Its better to go to store and inspect the guitars, play them and try and find one of the great ones. Talking of finish, PRS guitars have a thinner but harder wearing finish where as Gibsons are thicker but will wear through over time - the more you play, the quicker it will wear and that may well be a 'plus' for some - much more likely to 'relic' but a PRS is more likely to look like it was 'new' - unless you drop it or abuse of course. PRS also have much better customer service too... Horses for courses, Gibson will always sell because of their iconic history and nostalgia. They are 'great' guitars but not as consistent as PRS. That could also be down to the fact that PRS don't make anywhere near as many guitars in their US factory.
I know 'bleed' isn't the right term for modern guitars as they do scrape them as you say but it was just a term that people will be familiar with and associate to this issue - even if its not 'technically' correct. I have seen Gibsons that haven't been 'cleaned' perfectly and left some residual stain on the binding myself - and not on 'heritage' models. The point I was making about the finishes was more the long term wear - which some may prefer compared to having their guitar look like 'new' after years of playing like a PRS will. That still doesn't excuse the neck joint issues that I have also seen - some where the glue that has been squashed out isn't cleaned, smoothed etc, even one or two where there is a small 'gap' between the neck and body which to me is worse than having a bit of excess glue around the neck joint. The overall point of my comment was that whilst these issues do and can occur, they are not as widespread or as common as the internet would have you believe. There are some with flaws, with quality issues but there are still a lot of great, quality instruments too. I was agreeing with you that it is overstated but its still better to go and try a Gibson yourself where as with PRS being more consistent, you can literally buy online and get what you expect, have a very consistent quality and be pretty much like every other PRS in that model/wood combination. There is a MUCH bigger difference between the best and worst Gibson than PRS - not to say that the 'best' Gibson can't be just as good as the best PRS in terms of build quality. You can argue about the quality of the parts, the nut etc but in terms of build, the best Gibson can match the best PRS but they also seem to let more 'sub-standard' guitars through than PRS do.
At my local Guitar Center, about half the Gibsons there have arguable finishes (playability/tone etc aren't affected IMO)... that said, I play primarily LPs and SGs, so you just have to find one that's decent.
uneven application of nitro, frets not completely finished at the edges, and pieces of sawdust stuck in the finish around the neck. this is way less prevalent on the upper tier Gibsons though, and is more something I see on SG standard level guitars and below. def different scenario vs a decade+ ago.
@@MarlonKingShow Just had my PRS McCarty 594 delivered ohhh, 52 hrs ago. Absolutely love it. Makes my Strat feel like it's from Toys R Us. ( a bit harsh ) but dammnnn. I'm using a Mesa Mark V 25 amp and my God, makes a simple bar chord sound like an angel is singing. I was going to be cremated but can't do that now. Getting a hi end coffin and she's coming with !! Lol
@@johnmcaleese8459 I hear you on that one. I have a R8 and a McCarty 594 and I’m taking them to the grave (or passing them down to my son). I haven’t decided lol.
Every time i watch guitars i cannot believe how beautiful the les pauls are. Any les paul is daamn amazing i love it even though i dont have an electric guitar at all
I'd be too hard for me to choose between the 2. I'd have to go by comfort. I'd probably consider getting those fancy guitar straps with cushioning if I choose the les paul. I hate guitars that are too heavy cause I will play for 3 hours straight sometimes
Your shooting really being able to show how beautiful these guitars are, as well as your sound recording. That’s why I love watching your videos. Great job!
Agree.. to my ears it's got more charachter, is more open.sounding and sounds more invigorating to play (to my surprize) the PRS sounds good, as well, but more pop/polished/muted.
Was surprised that I liked the PRS tone over the Paul, esp the neck pickup. I never played a PRS but I jammed with a LP once and my shoulder hurt after a while. I must say, however, that EC's tone on the John Mayall "Beano" LP is one of the best I've ever heard.
Amazing comparison and playing as usually! That PRs has got me curious now! 😄 btw I love your orangewood Guitar reviews! I would love to see more reviews of the different models they offer! If you can do that Darrell I’d appreciate it! Rock on 🤘😄🎸 -Ian
I have always preferred the aesthetic of the Les Paul over the PRS, and the one in this video is stunning, but I honestly thought that I would prefer to tone of the PRS.I was actually kind of surprised. While both guitars sound fantastic (I'm sure your excellent playing had a lot to do with that, Darrell), I preferred the Gibson. Of course, good tone is subjective, but that bite just cut through the mix and really sounded good to me. You really can't go wrong with either one.
Both instruments have recorded absolutely iconic rock tones. For me the greatest lead tone ever recorded is Sweet Child O' Mine. The PRS is responsible for some of the greatest heavy rock tones ever. Anything Mark Tremonti plays just sounds phenomenal.
I'm not a musician or a guitar player, but I like to listen and my ears were voting for the PRS. One of my favorite guitar players, in live shows in clubs in Dallas and St. Louis, was Bugs Henderson (RIP)... he was a PRS guy.
The Gibson has a lot more treble, while it's trimmed off in the Smith. I'm really curious how this comparison would be if the 2 guitars traded pickups. And thank you for such awesome videos, Darrell!
I enjoyed that video good work great playing too. The Gibson has a distinct tone which we can all recognize. I think the PRS has it's own tone I feel the PRS more exudes the tone of the player more than the Gibson. PRS makes awesome quality guitars and Gibson's quality at times hasn't always been that great. I prefer PRS especially for the weight issue and the looks are awesome and playability is great as well.
I have both standard ranges of the LP and the custom 24 and I can easily say that both of these guitars are fantastic sounding as well as appropriately comfortable. Absolutely can’t go wrong with either. Another great vid!
I'm sick of these "Grammarly " commericials. Anyone else? oh! yah... great video Darrell! I've owned both Les Paul and PRS guitars and my impression is that the PRS is a much more refined instrument in every element of guitar building, but the Classic '57 gestures on a LP will never be entirely dismissed.
When playing the guitars by themselves, I thought the Les Paul had a richness and warmth that the PRS didn't match with no loss of clarity. In the mix however, the PRS cut through much better with every note and nuance sounding clear and distinct.
Own both. PRS has a creamy midrange that doesn’t bite like LP. For gigging PRS is easy on the shoulder and fingers. My fav guitar ever. If you don’t want to spend $$ on a PRS Custom go with their SE MODEL. nearly identical in play (I have SE TOO). SE passes the blindfold test vs. Custom.
Two of the best. When I finally decided to treat myself and start buying American builds vs imports....my entire perspective changed. These guitars may come at a premium, but they are just incredible. The LP has an undeniable, and un-replicable tone. I love the warmth, and massive, resonant tone of a Gibson LP. The PRS, in my opinion, is the most playable guitar in the world. I wouldn't be able to choose between them, and I feel incredibly lucky to own both.
I think I like the Gibson tone better but ergonomics, lightweightness, accessibility to higher frets, 24th fret, and tremelo system made me fall in love with the prs
Les Pauls are really heavy, and the back of the body has no contouring, so after a couple of hours playing one my back is sore and my torso feels bruised. Still, I love the way they play.
Awesome review. I appreciate the comparisons being so close in proximity to each other so you can really hear the tonal differences. Most reviewers seem to not do this. I love Strats but have been gasing for a prs. Les Pauls are just too heavy and even sitting down are very uncomfortable for me but they do sound amazing.
Nice one, Darrell... for me it's the PRS. Better tone and the workmanship that's gone into shaping that body. Now for the ultimate test...smash them both over an old Marshall to see what rings out best...hahahah (".)
Overall I prefer the PRS (not too surprising as I'm a Fender fan), but to give the Gibson some kudos, it held its own in the solo portion. That's the only place where I gave it the victory.
The PRS pick ups are warmer, clearer and push the amp to saturation quicker. Here is how I feel after listening to the comparison: Want something dirty to push a Fuzz, OD, Pitch Shift, Octave, or Distortion with some Flanger or Phase Shift? Choose a Gibson LP Standard (or Studio). Want something that has a lot of expression and breaks through the noise or for creating headspace by boosting into Chorus, Vibrato, Echo, Delay, Uni-vibe, Tremolo/Pan, Reverb? Choose a comparable quality PRS Custom 24 or better. I prefer a longer scale length. I just like the feel and a compound neck is easier on the hand and wrist IMO. I usually just jam through a bunch of different guitars, but I seem to always start with the heaviest and work my way to the lightest before I am done.
I have an se mira. The body on the mira is contoured a bit more so the dig into your forearm is not nearly as noticeable as on the custom. I would imagine the starla is the same. I purchased a les Paul. Realized it was a monster for my small build and hands. Returned it and bought the prs and have no plans of looking back. So for any other beginners out there. Those are great options to consider. You will not regret it. My guitar teachers both raved about how impressed they were with the quality. The same guys who gave my player series strat the cold shoulder.
After being a Gibson guy for many years, l find the PRS very refreshing to play. Its got it all l allways lean towards the PRS 90% of the time. I still love the LP it like coming home when l pick it up.
James Murphy - your local guitar store is probably collecting some heavy shelf turds from Gibson. Fewer people buy the ten + pounders so they sit around. Keep on the lookout for new ones coming in, or else order in a model you want. The newer Standard LP has a weight relieved mahogany back, and some guitars in the 1990s have pretty light mahogany if you see those around on Reverb or Craigslist. 'Good wood era.' I love the chunky sound of a good sounding eight pound Les Paul.
Nice comparison. I want to want a PRS so badly. Love the idea of them; the look, tuning stability, etc but a Les Paul always sound better to me. Rich and woody compared the somewhat cold "plink" of the PRS. Why I still play my old 90s Studio, flaws/quirks and all
Very good video man. Refreshing production quality and not trying too hard with jokes like a lot of RUclipsrs these days Also just the right detail in the comparison. Thanks, subscribed!
Congratulations. Just bought myself a Black Gold Burst McCarty 594. Beautiful. Plays nicer than it looks and in my opinion, easily one of the nicest looking guitars being made NO! EVER MADE. Was delivered in 90 + degrees out and hrs and hrs in the back of an UPS truck and still was in PERFECT tune. Feels really nice anf very well balanced.
John McAleese nice! I just got a faded whale blue McCarty 594. This thing is more comfortable and sounds better as well as looks better than my custom 1958 historic reissue Les Paul.
PRS is definitely missing that mid-tone LP has. I think it's because of the PRS lighter weight. LP is complete tone for me. Great comparison Mr. Darell Braun
You really have to be a diehard Gibson fan to opt for the LP in a head to head: The PRS is lighter, better balanced, with a smoother faster action, and far more comfortable to play, ergonomics-wise. The LP does get somewhat of a thicker tone, with beefier mids-But that one point in its favor would not make me choose it.
I think the best option for an LP Gibson diehard could be a Mccarty 594. I persnally don't dig the customs, but I just got the mccarty 594 and wow! I got the double cut. It's just amazing in every way and I feel so at home since its very gibsonian in every way.
I own both but to say that you have to be a Gibson Les Paul fan to choose it over a PRS is pointless when you mentioned the thicker tone on the LP. Why you ask, because people may enjoy that tone better and prioritize it over the weight etc After all music instruments are purchased for their sound are the not?
@@AllCarsUnited , I thought the point here is to express opinions: Of course anyone can choose whatever they want. But does it really make sense to shell out all that $, and shoulder pain, just to get that little extra midrange? Not to me.
The PRS sounds a little "cleaner", especially when playing high notes. It's easier to put it in the mix, and to hear every single tone better in a mix with drums, bass, rhythm guitar, etc. But it has less characteristic sound, compared to well known rock bands (radio, live, CDs, LPs). Concerning lower tones, the PRS sounds more mushy, just in contrast to its own high notes. By playing lower parts, the Gibson is more assertive.
Great video Darrell... I own both guitars and they are fantastic. I actually love the thick body and neck of the Les Paul and think it's easy and smooth to play. The PRS is great too, but different. I love having 24 frets and the option of single coil sounds in positions 2 and 4.
Keep in mind this has just been my experience with the guitars I have, but I tend to use my prs for higher distortion playing. The les paul can do it but doesn't shine like the prs does with loads upon loads of gain, but for everything south of ridiculously high gain, I immediately use my les paul
That was interesting! I'm a tele player and watched this to learn something. My take away? I thought the Les Paul sounded better than the PRS! I'm surprised... I had my eyes closed and was quite surprised when I opened them to see I had guessed wrongly. I like the PRS design, etc. so much more than the LP, but I must admit the LP sounds more convincing.
Good riffs, and playing! I found the Gibson sounds a bit more clear , did you precise wich Burst's pickups are in there ? (pro's , 1,2, 3, ??) thanks man! great demo and video! This make those 2 guitars really shine, because it's played with subtility :D Make a demo on how to set your lead tone one day hahaha
Gibson is a lot brighter. i had the same PRS back in the 90's. i loved it. it is its own classic. you have Gibson, fender and PRS . all great guitars .all very different and unique to themselves.
The LP sounds spectacular, detailed, etc vs the PRS sounds quenched, muffly, etc, in comparison. Understand all the issues with the LP itself...answer: ditch the PRS pickups and install any of the dozens of options, and why not the burst buckers themselves.
Something about PRS pickups that lack character. They're very well balanced, but sterile to my ears. I've noticed I don't feel that way about ones I've heard with swapped pickups. I don't know maybe this sounds dumb, but maybe they're a little too noiseless, and balanced.
My ex never wanted me spending money on musical instruments. She wanted to go on trips. She cheated on me and left me for that guy. Best thing that ever happened to me. Now i have a home studio and wall full of guitars😁
You also have your sanity and song writing material too. Rock on
@@carlosalves4444 thanks a bunch. Made my day
Guitar will never betray you
@@smithlee8396 guitar is our soul speaking out loud when we play it, my friend. Let all our worries and angst, our fun and joy always sing out through our beloved guitars.
Hell yeah brother
The LP is pretty good.
The PRS have a modern design.
I guess i have to go for a Squier.
Lol
The sound of theses two makes me cry tears of joy,
the price of these two is what makes me cry tears of pain.
Depending on where you live.
I am from EU and here an american PRS or a true LP from Gibson is simply unaffordable for my financial disposition. Even the korean made PRS are above my pay grade.
I go with Squiers and Harley Benton thats my price category. ;-)
@@countblue Instead of buying a bunch of guitars just save for a while bro
@@panama1942 Problem is even if I save all my guitars money I woudnt get one Fender for it here in my country, not even a used one. Prices are way beyond what you would think. Your advice sadly doesnt hold any water here. ;-)
@@countblue .....get a better paying job.
@@coleyounger3701 I am retired. ;-)
Anyone else watching this video but instead of having one of these guitars you have a Squier.
There's nothing wrong with a Squier, buddy. We all get caught up in the gear, but it's really just about the music. I've got high and low end guitars. I play like crap on all of them.
+Jimmy Parris lol no matter what gear we have, ourself is the most important upgrade. Keep playing man🤟🏼
no im watching this video but insted of having one of these guitars i have a cheap guitar from tesco
Squier boy here too :p
I got an affinity
Great quality but i hate how skinny the neck is
What's the point of painting it gold when you have a nice flame top? I never understand that.
It will be perfect for when I relic it! *ducks
Hahaha
i agree . kinda stupid isnt it. my PRS was a dark brown flaming top. just beautiful!
They use maple tops that are not up to their "10" top standards to paint over with gold, black and other solid colors.
LoL, oUt LoUd!! @@DarrellBraunGuitar
Well, that settles it once and for all. Gotta have one of each!
My sentiment exactly! I have both (Standard and McCarty). Custom 24 is in my future too as well as another LP (R9 burst you are calling my name 😉). Love your playing as always Darrell! God bless.
Best comment!!!
lewisbeeman - nothing lost in playing different models. People forget that it's not just the money of buying and selling guitars, it's the experiences and memories you create that really matter. Tell yourself it's OK to pay "Rent" on guitars you want to resell after a couple years. It's really cheap enjoyment regardless.
jonas brave although I agree with your overall statement, I am not for making payments on a guitar. Cash or nothing for me. I’ve had expensive stuff that I wasn’t in love with. I’ve play “budget” guitars I’ve loved and vice versa. Currently because I am a college student, on a tighter budget, I am interested in building from scratch and fixing up cheaper stuff. I have found great enjoyment building them. And I also like the reward of having a killer guitar with Squier on the headstock.
Totally agree! I love both my PRS Custom 24 and Les Paul!
Which flagship guitar was your favorite?
To my ear the LP Standard had a sort of raw or "rough around the edges" bite, while the PRS CU24 was balanced and composed in every scenario thrown at it :)
Les Paul: imp.i114863.net/Yeq2B
PRS: imp.i114863.net/Yeq2B
Darrell Braun Guitar Often imitated, never duplicated, there’s just something about the Les Paul. That raw, rough around the edges bite just does it for me. Although the PRS does have a great sound.
Darrell Braun Guitar I’ve got to agree, to my ear the PRS was warmer sounding, a rounder feel to it. I love both but the PRS is my personal favorite. BTW, thanks for the Southern Rock feel tonight.
love the sounds that are possible from each of these. However, the PRS gold top is not something that would shout out to me "Hey! pick me up and give me a go." well played regardless.
I've always loved a good Les Paul. But when I got my first really high-end PRS I noticed that when playing live it kind of just disappeared and felt like the music just showed up automatically. There's still a bite and sound quality to a less Paul that really can't be replicated, but a good PRS is so much more stable and reliable and has a higher playability it's really tough to beat.
Darrell would you comment please on what you think about open chords on the two guitars?
I thought while listening that the LP went a little sour more because of tuning than pickups and construction.
Great video both very beautiful and desirable instruments, thanks!
I've had a PRS in mind for a while, the build quality looks another level however in this video the Les Paul tone is hands-down the winner for me in all but the bridge pick up dirty where I'm equally thrilled. So I'm a bit deflated now, both stunning to look at, thanks for posting.
You need to try a 594 McCarty with 58/15lt pickups. The 57/09 pickups are supposed to be close to Gibson, but the high end PRS guitars…$4k+ are amazing
Yep everytime I read comments people convince me I want a tele or a higher end PRS. But everytime I watch videos and hear the tones, it’s always a LP I seem to want most. Same with a bass. Everyone convinced of a P or Jazz Bass but everytime I hear a video of tones, it’s always a MM Stingray I enjoy the most. Trust your ears.
I prefer the feel of a PRS more than a Les Paul, it feels like I have to fight against Les Pauls to play them which some people prefer, but not me. The PRS is more suited to modern players for sure.
I always feel like I am “fighting” with my Gibson as well. My PRS plays for me practically.
Darn you for convincing me a PRS😑, explain to my wife why I’m dropping $2000😂
I bought Paul’s Guitar yesterday in Honey Color. It’s amazing...I also have the Tremonti which I love. My Gibson LP is cool though and I don’t hate on it by any means. I find myself gravitate towards the PRS though....just beautiful guitars.
Try an sg -very easy guitar to play.
"modern players"? explain.
The Custom 24 has more clarity but the Les Paul just sounds meaner and angrier. Qualities I like in a rock n roll guitar
Nothing sounds like a lp with some dirt in the tone. The cleans are debatable. But for me prs guitars miss the depth that lps have
@@kennethwatson4489 the Jackson wants to be a Gibson LP and knows this is impossible, so it masquerades in the skin of the Gibson?
I have both guitars. The PRS has the best tuning stability of any guitar I've played. The Gibson struggles in that category, but the scale length on a Gibson is just so easy to play compared to anything else. The PRS has amazing clean tone and the build quality is better than a Les Paul standard in my opinion. Both are great guitars, but I like my PRS better.
The playing feel and snap / aggressiveness of the LP aren't exactly replicated by PRS. It's slicker but a bit too refined for its own sake no matter how you dig in.
Play a PRS 594.. basically a 24.5 scale.. plays like butter and the 58/15lts are to me the best paf I have ever heard
That surprised me... The LP had a lot of clarity in all 3 positions that that PRS didn't seem to have. The pickups in the LP are def interesting. Great A/B video.
SkyScraper Guitars yeah I was surprised how much sharper the LP was especially on the neck
I liked it more too
Jorge Chávez me too
Agreed plus the LP sounded more open.
Agree. Both sounded great, but to my ears the LP had a lot more clarity, while the PRS just came off a tad muddier. I'd be happy with either in my arsenal!
PRS most versatile guitar I ever owned. You can play everything from jazz to death metal and, never goes out of tune
I’d say it’s a tie between the custom 24 and telecaster, but kind of in different ways. If you like that little bit more of a les Paul feel to your tone go custom 24, want that fender twang side of the spectrum? Go tele.
@@jeebusyaweirdo3733 telecaster are the most overatted guitars. prs smashes tele
@@RUARI-mi1yt both are great in their own right, coming from a builders perspective. PRS makes great guitars, however the telecaster has been and will likely always be one of the highest sold and recorded guitars out there. I like a variety, imo it’s another voice you’re just choosing to miss out on.
@@jeebusyaweirdo3733 is there any difference between prs se standard and customm
I’m always in a better mood after watching your videos. Thanks!
Glad to hear it :)
I have both guitars, PRS is the most versatile and sounds almost as good as Gibson. I met Paul Reed Smith in 1977 thru my roommate in college, his younger brother Charlie.
Great...now I have to convince my wife that I NEED a PRS to compliment my Gibsons.
You really do there simply an amazing instrument!
I have 4 SE's with a new compensated nut (a must if you ask me...the neck is pretty much perfectly in tune everywhere) and seymore duncans and locking tuners....and you HAVE to change the bridge.....so the SE will set you back about $3-400....$300 worth of electronics and a couple hours work and you really have a nice guitar that if stolen won't make you cry for a year. Every one of mine sets up great and plays every bit as good as a core if you ask me. The Floyd Rose has a bit of a hard time staying perfectly in tune but if it's set up right it's not that bad. Lessons learned.....I have a traditional pro LP and love it too...but it will make you stand crooked from the weight but I love it too. ALL of which are blacked out in every way.....sorry...fetish
A great compliment to a LP is a PRS CE22. The snap of the maple is really nice if you already have a LP. Seek one out that's used and from the previous generation (pre 2010 or thereabouts). The new version has a thinner top, shallow bevel carve and the neck is 3 piece flat sawn with a scarf joint. The old ones had a half inch top, full violin carve and a straight grain quarter sawn neck.
I see no reason why you can't have one of each. They are all very different instruments. I've been in the mindset of cleaning house and selling all my OK guitars with the goal of getting one great one. I have a great Les Paul. Now I need that great Strat. Will also be looking into PRS for those situations when I need versatility.
Good luck
I own both (though my 2017 PRS has the 85/15s) and this is a debate every time I go to practice. The LP sounds more authentic to me for classic rock, but overall I prefer the clarity and chime of the PRS. The PRS also sounds way better in the split modes (I LOVE position 4) than the LP.
The clarity and chime of the PRS was exactly was I was trying to obtain from my Gibsons but never could. I love my CE22!
I have both as well. I like both. There's just something about a PRS that warms the cockles of my heart.
You own both!! Someday hopefully I will be able to say the same!! Jajajaja congratulations!!!!
@@Osmorales90 I'm not rich, just kinda stupid with money when it comes to gear! Good luck buying your dream guitarS!
In this video, the PRS is lacking clarity.. .
That gold top on the PRS is beautiful but what’s even more gorgeous is the epic flame maple underneath. Some people converted their gold top les Paul’s from the mid fifties to a burst because they had such vibrant flame maple caps on them and everybody was chasing the “burst guitar” look.
Tough call! Love them both of course! Thanks for sharing brother!
Tough call for sure! 👍
When talking Les Paul vs everything else. Even the cheapest les paul will produce this classic thick tone that we know and love. Other guitars don't have this distinctive sound. Les paul tone is great thats why anyone wants a les paul but as a main guitar for me its a no. First of all the LP shape is great to look at but not that comfortable and second of all the thickness of the LP tone will allow for nothing less than that. The PRS is way more versatile way more proper for the player (as far as comfort is concerned) and some argue that it's better built with better intonation. For a main guitar the PRS is yes yes even the SE models are great, the LP is a great guitar to have just not as a main one. My personal opinion
Nail on the head.
For a stage guitar where the last 5% of sound is not as crucial as staying in tune, being comfortable and having a wang-bar if you want it - the PRS wins. Other than the presence of that classic outline of the binding that is visible from 200 yds away, the LP has no big advantage on stage.
But man.... when you need that classic blast of chunky rhythm in a tune...that attitude....nothing beats the LP, imho. Not even close.
An LP to me is like Paul Bunyan just tore a piece of a tree off and nailed some strings to the resultant log - just to whack you in the face with it - beautifully.
Lp for studio recording prs for live perform
That’s just what good humbuckers do. It’s mostly about the pickups and amp
My Epiphone SG Special (very cheap) sounds better than my PRS 22. Not kidding.
Very interesting comparison, and once again my expectations were busted. For perhaps the first time in a PRS - LP shootout, the PRS came out on top for me. I've always felt the PRS guitars sounded thin and kind of one-dimensional. Not so for this test. Good job, Darrell.
P.S. I love the looks of both the Gibson and the PRS... but I'm still a Strat guy.
PRS are just 'next level'... once you own one, you'll know...
As a new PRS Custom 24 owner, I agree.
I’ve got both but no that’s not true. You have to compare it to a “good” Gibson though. I admit they’re not all up there but once you get ahold of a good Gibson it is all a matter of choice. For me I like one for a while than I like the other one for some time. It always changes.
Also my favorite prs guitar is a custom 22 actually a p22 (custom 22 with a piezo pickup and dual outputs). I like the neck pup way more on a 22fret prs.
MrEkin03 - agree that 22 frets are better than 24 frets for neck pickup tone. Plus there's just less wood carved away around the neck join. Hell Yngwie plays only 21 fret necks, so fellas don't be afraid to do some work for your notes.
I own both and absolutely love each for their own unique qualities. I do have two PRS guitars though and only one Gibson.. Speaks for itself?
Used to own a LP. Now there are 3 PRS's in its place. I run with several different bands and their lead players always ask me to bring one of the PRS's for them to play. It is very noticeable when the PRS is singing versus when they are playing a tele, strat or LP. The other part of that is when the people in the audience make comments on the same subject. There are many very good sounding guitars out there but PRS has just seemed to step in front of most others now days. More and more players are moving to PRS. Sound and build quality of PRS speaks volumes and people are taking note. Great video comparison by the way.
they sounded more similar at the neck position, but the LP rang thru louder and crisper at the bridge, (with my headphones and settings anyway!) That PRS sure was smooth tho. I have lower end LP and PRS guitars similarly priced to each other and different in tone & feel, but pretty equal in quality. I think you've inspired me to do my own test just for myself!
The LP had more presence and personality. The PRS was smoother. I like the rawness of the LP.
Exactly how I called it, too.
@@NisseOhlsen PRS sounded muddy to me
Exactly what I thought.
HAHAHA NO.
I have owned a few Les Pauls and 2 PRS (CE22 & CU24). I love my Les Paul especially on classic rock numbers but whenever I plug in the PRS it’s like a Hi-Fi version of humbuckers. The clarity is just insane and I sometime really think the PRS could be that one guitar if my life depends on it (they are really like Swiss army knife type of guitar as they do Strat sounds super convincingly too!). If you can afford both then you definitely should
Something unique about that Les Paul tone that I might never get tired of.
PRS is everything i love about a good guitar, perfect for me.
Listening to this, I was surprised that I clearly preferred the LP. Its tone has a subtlety and complexity that is strangely missing in the PRS. The PRS has a warmer, fatter sound and may cut through a bit more, but it's not singing like the LP. Maybe I'm missing something, but there are countless guitars out there that sound just like the expensive PRS. Or at least the one being played here. It lacks a distinctive character. Of course, it's got the more ergonomic shape. Wish Gibson did something on this front.
Respectfully disagree with the cons of the LP. I personally love my LP in my lap, and I just don’t ever feel as though it is difficult to reach high up the board, or anything that seems difficult to me. I do enjoy the reduced weight of the PRS, and I love the tone of both. I feel that both are a great playing experience not just the PRS. Just me I guess. Awesome video!
Darrell, either one of these would be welcome in my home! Both beautiful and they sound really full-throated. Given Gibson's reported quality issues lately I think I'd likely lean towards the PRS.
Hi David, I've played but not owned a Gibson guitar. I have several friends who bought Gibson over the past couple of years and they have had some issues. Still, if someone gave me one for Christmas I wouldn't be unhappy :-)
I do agree in part that Gibson's QC problems are overstated but that doesn't mean they match up to PRS standards either. The thing with PRS is that they are incredibly consistent, try one and you have tried them all, inspect one and you have inspected them all - they are so consistent that you can buy online and get what you expect without having to inspect or try.
With Gibson, there is a greater range within the same model. Of course a LOT are great, with very little issues at all (other than those typically associated with LP's like tuning stability thanks to the break angle at the headstock), but there are a number with 'quality' issues too - some very minor like stain bleeding into the binding to glue not being cleaned properly around the neck joint, to more 'major' issues like a gap at the neck joint. Its better to go to store and inspect the guitars, play them and try and find one of the great ones.
Talking of finish, PRS guitars have a thinner but harder wearing finish where as Gibsons are thicker but will wear through over time - the more you play, the quicker it will wear and that may well be a 'plus' for some - much more likely to 'relic' but a PRS is more likely to look like it was 'new' - unless you drop it or abuse of course. PRS also have much better customer service too...
Horses for courses, Gibson will always sell because of their iconic history and nostalgia. They are 'great' guitars but not as consistent as PRS. That could also be down to the fact that PRS don't make anywhere near as many guitars in their US factory.
I know 'bleed' isn't the right term for modern guitars as they do scrape them as you say but it was just a term that people will be familiar with and associate to this issue - even if its not 'technically' correct. I have seen Gibsons that haven't been 'cleaned' perfectly and left some residual stain on the binding myself - and not on 'heritage' models. The point I was making about the finishes was more the long term wear - which some may prefer compared to having their guitar look like 'new' after years of playing like a PRS will.
That still doesn't excuse the neck joint issues that I have also seen - some where the glue that has been squashed out isn't cleaned, smoothed etc, even one or two where there is a small 'gap' between the neck and body which to me is worse than having a bit of excess glue around the neck joint.
The overall point of my comment was that whilst these issues do and can occur, they are not as widespread or as common as the internet would have you believe. There are some with flaws, with quality issues but there are still a lot of great, quality instruments too. I was agreeing with you that it is overstated but its still better to go and try a Gibson yourself where as with PRS being more consistent, you can literally buy online and get what you expect, have a very consistent quality and be pretty much like every other PRS in that model/wood combination. There is a MUCH bigger difference between the best and worst Gibson than PRS - not to say that the 'best' Gibson can't be just as good as the best PRS in terms of build quality. You can argue about the quality of the parts, the nut etc but in terms of build, the best Gibson can match the best PRS but they also seem to let more 'sub-standard' guitars through than PRS do.
At my local Guitar Center, about half the Gibsons there have arguable finishes (playability/tone etc aren't affected IMO)... that said, I play primarily LPs and SGs, so you just have to find one that's decent.
uneven application of nitro, frets not completely finished at the edges, and pieces of sawdust stuck in the finish around the neck.
this is way less prevalent on the upper tier Gibsons though, and is more something I see on SG standard level guitars and below. def different scenario vs a decade+ ago.
I had to make this decision for myself and chose PRS guitars. The quality is just better and as a result I have 23 of them.
hahaha, I just bought my first one, now I am selling my Ibanez to buy another one.
@@MarlonKingShow Just had my PRS McCarty 594 delivered ohhh, 52 hrs ago. Absolutely love it. Makes my Strat feel like it's from Toys R Us. ( a bit harsh ) but dammnnn. I'm using a Mesa Mark V 25 amp and my God, makes a simple bar chord sound like an angel is singing. I was going to be cremated but can't do that now. Getting a hi end coffin and she's coming with !! Lol
@@johnmcaleese8459 I hear you on that one. I have a R8 and a McCarty 594 and I’m taking them to the grave (or passing them down to my son). I haven’t decided lol.
@@michaelzschoche2746 Wait to see how well your son treats ya when we need to be spoon fed. Lol
Every time i watch guitars i cannot believe how beautiful the les pauls are. Any les paul is daamn amazing i love it even though i dont have an electric guitar at all
I'd be too hard for me to choose between the 2. I'd have to go by comfort. I'd probably consider getting those fancy guitar straps with cushioning if I choose the les paul. I hate guitars that are too heavy cause I will play for 3 hours straight sometimes
Your shooting really being able to show how beautiful these guitars are, as well as your sound recording. That’s why I love watching your videos. Great job!
Thanks CH!
When it comes to the sound in this video, it's the Les Paul all the way for me.
Agree.. to my ears it's got more charachter, is more open.sounding and sounds more invigorating to play (to my surprize) the PRS sounds good, as well, but more pop/polished/muted.
Me too. I had really wanted to get a PRS on reputation. I was comparing my R-7 LP GT against a PRS Custom 24. THe LP won tonally everytime.
Why do you put a superb flame maple top on it, then cover it with gold paint?
imagine a used look on this
Because some people like that.
$o you can $ay you have one, that's why. Exclusivity works like nothing else.
Weight too, maple is a lot lighter.
Was surprised that I liked the PRS tone over the Paul, esp the neck pickup. I never played a PRS but I jammed with a LP once and my shoulder hurt after a while. I must say, however, that EC's tone on the John Mayall "Beano" LP is one of the best I've ever heard.
Amazing comparison and playing as usually! That PRs has got me curious now! 😄 btw I love your orangewood Guitar reviews! I would love to see more reviews of the different models they offer! If you can do that Darrell I’d appreciate it!
Rock on 🤘😄🎸
-Ian
Thanks Ian!
I'll see what I can do :)
nothing plays better than PRS but when it comes to sound i want a LP standard into a tube screamer into a Marshall JCM 800
I have always preferred the aesthetic of the Les Paul over the PRS, and the one in this video is stunning, but I honestly thought that I would prefer to tone of the PRS.I was actually kind of surprised. While both guitars sound fantastic (I'm sure your excellent playing had a lot to do with that, Darrell), I preferred the Gibson. Of course, good tone is subjective, but that bite just cut through the mix and really sounded good to me. You really can't go wrong with either one.
Both instruments have recorded absolutely iconic rock tones. For me the greatest lead tone ever recorded is Sweet Child O' Mine. The PRS is responsible for some of the greatest heavy rock tones ever. Anything Mark Tremonti plays just sounds phenomenal.
I'm not a musician or a guitar player, but I like to listen and my ears were voting for the PRS. One of my favorite guitar players, in live shows in clubs in Dallas and St. Louis, was Bugs Henderson (RIP)... he was a PRS guy.
My dads home WiFi password is GibsonPRS lol
The LP sounds better in almost all contests. It’s got my vote.
i cant hear the differences between the two when the tone goes dirty,but PRS sounds clarity and bright.
Great comparison test Dude ... Thank you!
The Gibson has a lot more treble, while it's trimmed off in the Smith. I'm really curious how this comparison would be if the 2 guitars traded pickups. And thank you for such awesome videos, Darrell!
I enjoyed that video good work great playing too. The Gibson has a distinct tone which we can all recognize. I think the PRS has it's own tone I feel the PRS more exudes the tone of the player more than the Gibson. PRS makes awesome quality guitars and Gibson's quality at times hasn't always been that great. I prefer PRS especially for the weight issue and the looks are awesome and playability is great as well.
I have both standard ranges of the LP and the custom 24 and I can easily say that both of these guitars are fantastic sounding as well as appropriately comfortable. Absolutely can’t go wrong with either. Another great vid!
I just love all about your channel. I am just starting to learn and I already have you as a guide.
I'm sick of these "Grammarly " commericials. Anyone else? oh! yah... great video Darrell! I've owned both Les Paul and PRS guitars and my impression is that the PRS is a much more refined instrument in every element of guitar building, but the Classic '57 gestures on a LP will never be entirely dismissed.
When playing the guitars by themselves, I thought the Les Paul had a richness and warmth that the PRS didn't match with no loss of clarity. In the mix however, the PRS cut through much better with every note and nuance sounding clear and distinct.
The PRS sounded thinner to me.
Thinner and crisper. The les Paul is more explosive.
Own both. PRS has a creamy midrange that doesn’t bite like LP. For gigging PRS is easy on the shoulder and fingers. My fav guitar ever. If you don’t want to spend $$ on a PRS Custom go with their SE MODEL. nearly identical in play (I have SE TOO). SE passes the blindfold test vs. Custom.
Two of the best. When I finally decided to treat myself and start buying American builds vs imports....my entire perspective changed. These guitars may come at a premium, but they are just incredible.
The LP has an undeniable, and un-replicable tone. I love the warmth, and massive, resonant tone of a Gibson LP.
The PRS, in my opinion, is the most playable guitar in the world.
I wouldn't be able to choose between them, and I feel incredibly lucky to own both.
That les Paul is beautiful! ! I'm old school stick with the les Paul both are Awesome guitars
I think I like the Gibson tone better but ergonomics, lightweightness, accessibility to higher frets, 24th fret, and tremelo system made me fall in love with the prs
Les Pauls are really heavy, and the back of the body has no contouring, so after a couple of hours playing one my back is sore and my torso feels bruised. Still, I love the way they play.
Awesome review. I appreciate the comparisons being so close in proximity to each other so you can really hear the tonal differences. Most reviewers seem to not do this. I love Strats but have been gasing for a prs. Les Pauls are just too heavy and even sitting down are very uncomfortable for me but they do sound amazing.
That blue flame is unreal!! I love that axe 🪓
Nice one, Darrell... for me it's the PRS. Better tone and the workmanship that's gone into shaping that body.
Now for the ultimate test...smash them both over an old Marshall to see what rings out best...hahahah (".)
The Gibson definitely wins the beauty contest, love that finish... I think it wins in regards to tone, too!
I like the colors more on the Les Paul, but the shape of the PRS more. PRS tone for me though
CodyTheDoggo
Most PRS guitars aren’t painted and have absolutely stunning tops and backs plus the comfortable contour carve outs.
Overall I prefer the PRS (not too surprising as I'm a Fender fan), but to give the Gibson some kudos, it held its own in the solo portion. That's the only place where I gave it the victory.
The PRS pick ups are warmer, clearer and push the amp to saturation quicker. Here is how I feel after listening to the comparison: Want something dirty to push a Fuzz, OD, Pitch Shift, Octave, or Distortion with some Flanger or Phase Shift? Choose a Gibson LP Standard (or Studio). Want something that has a lot of expression and breaks through the noise or for creating headspace by boosting into Chorus, Vibrato, Echo, Delay, Uni-vibe, Tremolo/Pan, Reverb? Choose a comparable quality PRS Custom 24 or better. I prefer a longer scale length. I just like the feel and a compound neck is easier on the hand and wrist IMO. I usually just jam through a bunch of different guitars, but I seem to always start with the heaviest and work my way to the lightest before I am done.
For me it's the Les Paul all the way.
I feel lucky to own one.
The PRS definitely sounds a bit " thinner " than the LP but both are great .
Really? The PRS sounded rounder to me.
The Les Paul sounded nicer to my ear without accompaniment, but in the mix the CU24 cuts through and shines.
Probably thinner strings
I have an se mira. The body on the mira is contoured a bit more so the dig into your forearm is not nearly as noticeable as on the custom. I would imagine the starla is the same.
I purchased a les Paul. Realized it was a monster for my small build and hands. Returned it and bought the prs and have no plans of looking back. So for any other beginners out there. Those are great options to consider. You will not regret it. My guitar teachers both raved about how impressed they were with the quality. The same guys who gave my player series strat the cold shoulder.
After being a Gibson guy for many years, l find the PRS very refreshing to play. Its got it all l allways lean towards the PRS 90% of the time. I still love the LP it like coming home when l pick it up.
PRS all day my shoulder is sore looking at the LP.
James Murphy actually the standards they have been making for a while are not that heavy at all.
James Murphy - your local guitar store is probably collecting some heavy shelf turds from Gibson. Fewer people buy the ten + pounders so they sit around. Keep on the lookout for new ones coming in, or else order in a model you want.
The newer Standard LP has a weight relieved mahogany back, and some guitars in the 1990s have pretty light mahogany if you see those around on Reverb or Craigslist. 'Good wood era.' I love the chunky sound of a good sounding eight pound Les Paul.
Be a man among men.Les Paul.
You should have tried my original 1952... It was over 9 pounds.
Gym time, Jamie.
. both great guitars, but I would go for the prs for the convenience of the tremolo...
Nice comparison. I want to want a PRS so badly. Love the idea of them; the look, tuning stability, etc but a Les Paul always sound better to me. Rich and woody compared the somewhat cold "plink" of the PRS. Why I still play my old 90s Studio, flaws/quirks and all
Darrel how do you feel about the PRS single cut trem artist top?
I'm lucky enough to have both, so I don't have to choose.
How tf do you afford both
What do you mean? You just work and buy them.
@@jebz712 save up and work
The PRS looks like a Les Paul meets an SG mixed in with a Stratocaster. It's some kinda abomination. The SG is insane. Love a good Les Paul too.
Love your videos!! I swear you never seem to disappoint me, keep up the great work👍
Thanks this is something I've wondered about for years.
Prs slays the Gibson in every tone except bridge dirty. I feel like the PRS sits in the mix a lot better as well. Great vid as usual 👍
I respect the history & legacy of the Les Paul, but I'm picking a PRS every time
Very good video man. Refreshing production quality and not trying too hard with jokes like a lot of RUclipsrs these days
Also just the right detail in the comparison. Thanks, subscribed!
Both guitars sound great. Love to have them both.
Gibson just a bit too bright. Def solidified my desire (and plan for this coming week) for a PRS. Just sounds so much more well balanced.
Congratulations. Just bought myself a Black Gold Burst McCarty 594. Beautiful. Plays nicer than it looks and in my opinion, easily one of the nicest looking guitars being made NO! EVER MADE. Was delivered in 90 + degrees out and hrs and hrs in the back of an UPS truck and still was in PERFECT tune. Feels really nice anf very well balanced.
John McAleese nice! I just got a faded whale blue McCarty 594. This thing is more comfortable and sounds better as well as looks better than my custom 1958 historic reissue Les Paul.
Such a smooth satisfying sound from then PRS; it sounds sooo musical, the LP sounds like each note was a struggle to try to get a good sound.
I don’t know why but I just simply adore the bridge pick up on a les Paul more than any other guitar
PRS is definitely missing that mid-tone LP has. I think it's because of the PRS lighter weight. LP is complete tone for me. Great comparison Mr. Darell Braun
You really have to be a diehard Gibson fan to opt for the LP in a head to head:
The PRS is lighter, better balanced, with a smoother faster action, and far more comfortable to play, ergonomics-wise.
The LP does get somewhat of a thicker tone, with beefier mids-But that one point in its favor would not make me choose it.
I think the best option for an LP Gibson diehard could be a Mccarty 594.
I persnally don't dig the customs, but I just got the mccarty 594 and wow! I got the double cut. It's just amazing in every way and I feel so at home since its very gibsonian in every way.
I own both but to say that you have to be a Gibson Les Paul fan to choose it over a PRS is pointless when you mentioned the thicker tone on the LP. Why you ask, because people may enjoy that tone better and prioritize it over the weight etc
After all music instruments are purchased for their sound are the not?
@@AllCarsUnited ,
I thought the point here is to express opinions: Of course anyone can choose whatever they want.
But does it really make sense to shell out all that $, and shoulder pain, just to get that little extra midrange?
Not to me.
There's nothing bad with PRS. There's just something good with LP
The PRS sounds a little "cleaner", especially when playing high notes. It's easier to put it in the mix, and to hear every single tone better in a mix with drums, bass, rhythm guitar, etc. But it has less characteristic sound, compared to well known rock bands (radio, live, CDs, LPs). Concerning lower tones, the PRS sounds more mushy, just in contrast to its own high notes. By playing lower parts, the Gibson is more assertive.
Great video Darrell... I own both guitars and they are fantastic. I actually love the thick body and neck of the Les Paul and think it's easy and smooth to play. The PRS is great too, but different. I love having 24 frets and the option of single coil sounds in positions 2 and 4.
PRS guitar just almost always end up sounding sterile to me. I want to like them, but they just don't do it for me.
Keep in mind this has just been my experience with the guitars I have, but I tend to use my prs for higher distortion playing. The les paul can do it but doesn't shine like the prs does with loads upon loads of gain, but for everything south of ridiculously high gain, I immediately use my les paul
The clean sound of the PRS is beautiful. Bring on the hate, but I've never been a LP fan.
Jason Sanders ; same !
I am a huge LP fan... PRS just build better guitars these days.
No hate, it's your opinion, man.
The LP fans have all clawed their eyes out because of the blue lacquer.
I agree
That was interesting! I'm a tele player and watched this to learn something. My take away? I thought the Les Paul sounded better than the PRS! I'm surprised... I had my eyes closed and was quite surprised when I opened them to see I had guessed wrongly. I like the PRS design, etc. so much more than the LP, but I must admit the LP sounds more convincing.
Good riffs, and playing! I found the Gibson sounds a bit more clear , did you precise wich Burst's pickups are in there ? (pro's , 1,2, 3, ??) thanks man! great demo and video! This make those 2 guitars really shine, because it's played with subtility :D Make a demo on how to set your lead tone one day hahaha
I can’t decide.....it’s a good thing I own both. 😏
Blkjakk nice
2 over priced guitars. Out of the two i would choose the prs.
Smartest comment here
Gibson is a lot brighter. i had the same PRS back in the 90's. i loved it. it is its own classic. you have Gibson, fender and PRS . all great guitars .all very different and unique to themselves.
Have both CU24 and LP traditional. Both great guitars. My fave is the LP sound wise, PRS lighter and slicker neck.
I’ve kinda always thought PRS sounded pretty sterile for some reason.
The LP sounds spectacular, detailed, etc vs the PRS sounds quenched, muffly, etc, in comparison. Understand all the issues with the LP itself...answer: ditch the PRS pickups and install any of the dozens of options, and why not the burst buckers themselves.
Something about PRS pickups that lack character. They're very well balanced, but sterile to my ears. I've noticed I don't feel that way about ones I've heard with swapped pickups. I don't know maybe this sounds dumb, but maybe they're a little too noiseless, and balanced.
Nice video.. I've played PRS since 89' still my favorite!