@@reedjohnny4635 wow, really? I mean they have every right to but so far I haven't heard anything that different from what YC's been saying elsewhere for a while now. Not sure what that 150 is buying you.
The effectiveness of Curtis's model under the specific circumstances he conveys establishes a quasi moral excuse for unleashing what could be a hot mess, like a big pile of steaming horseshit. What of non-crimes -economic, political and social dissent..? How will those be handled under monarcharial authority? Hard labor too? What's the non-bloody course of corrective action when your monarcical wet dream goes rogue and a true devious sociopath replaces your Louie??
The state is currently run by a band of truly devious sociopaths. Your question boils down to "what if that thing turns into the current thing?" But that can hardly be a reason to keep the current thing. Anyways, Yarvin is still wrong. The monarchical ethic is just as wrong as the democratic ethic. Only the liberal ethic rightly describes law.
We already have that though. Instead of one sociopath, we have 1,000 tiny ones that work against us, which is the whole point of a monarchy, he’s the head of the nation and when things go good or bad, that’s directly on him. As for course correction, that’s rather easy. Pick another successor if things don’t go the way they should.
What about the effectiveness of the current model? As Megaman has stated, we've traded one monarch for 1,000 oligarchs, who were completely comfortable forcing us inside our homes, destroying small businesses, and making us say goodbye to loved ones over the phone or through glass while rioters burned down cities. The people who subjugated us in this way can't be ousted by elections, so even our "democratic voice" is silenced...a false top-level storm while the creatures that dwell in the deep ocean trudge along. You don't have to imagine what it looks like to live in a broken system -- we're in one.
![GUILTY GEAR -STRIVE- Season Pass 4 Playable Character #1 [Queen Dizzy] Trailer](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nXDsAgYXXv4/mqdefault.jpg)
Curtis Yarvin just recount Singapore in the 60s.
Where is the rest of the talk? Seems like it’s cut off
They literally want you to pay $150 for the rest.
@@reedjohnny4635 wow, really? I mean they have every right to but so far I haven't heard anything that different from what YC's been saying elsewhere for a while now. Not sure what that 150 is buying you.
The effectiveness of Curtis's model under the specific circumstances he conveys establishes a quasi moral excuse for unleashing what could be a hot mess, like a big pile of steaming horseshit.
What of non-crimes -economic, political and social dissent..?
How will those be handled under monarcharial authority?
Hard labor too?
What's the non-bloody course of corrective action when your monarcical wet dream goes rogue and a true devious sociopath replaces your Louie??
The state is currently run by a band of truly devious sociopaths. Your question boils down to "what if that thing turns into the current thing?" But that can hardly be a reason to keep the current thing.
Anyways, Yarvin is still wrong. The monarchical ethic is just as wrong as the democratic ethic. Only the liberal ethic rightly describes law.
nothing worse than 5 years ago
We already have that though. Instead of one sociopath, we have 1,000 tiny ones that work against us, which is the whole point of a monarchy, he’s the head of the nation and when things go good or bad, that’s directly on him.
As for course correction, that’s rather easy. Pick another successor if things don’t go the way they should.
What about the effectiveness of the current model? As Megaman has stated, we've traded one monarch for 1,000 oligarchs, who were completely comfortable forcing us inside our homes, destroying small businesses, and making us say goodbye to loved ones over the phone or through glass while rioters burned down cities. The people who subjugated us in this way can't be ousted by elections, so even our "democratic voice" is silenced...a false top-level storm while the creatures that dwell in the deep ocean trudge along. You don't have to imagine what it looks like to live in a broken system -- we're in one.
there is no fool proof algorithm for good government
Lmao isnt it el salvador
@@Ultravengo Yes. I earnestly wish them well but remember not long ago when Ecuador was all the rage..? Now it really is... just not in a good way.
San Salvador is the city he is in