Why the Patek 5236P is the brand's best release of 2021 - Patek 5236P watch review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 янв 2025

Комментарии • 36

  • @cablesurge
    @cablesurge 2 года назад

    Great effort! Keep it up bro 🎉

  • @chiefexecutiveofficerofyoutube
    @chiefexecutiveofficerofyoutube 3 года назад +7

    It worths every dollar spent!

  • @charleslee3081
    @charleslee3081 3 года назад +2

    hope to see your review of your PP5110r soon.

  • @GoodToCU88
    @GoodToCU88 3 года назад +1

    Definitely considering the VC Perpetual Calendar in white gold.

    • @watchesinsingapore
      @watchesinsingapore  3 года назад

      saw it in person and it's amazing. Aiming to get the rose gold version myself.

  • @TimG--
    @TimG-- 3 года назад +1

    Nice content mate 🥃

  • @GasStationSushiiii
    @GasStationSushiiii 3 года назад +1

    That is an absolute beauty, truly the best Patel of recent. Now imagine this in a Nautilus haha

  • @eugenejohnson7755
    @eugenejohnson7755 2 года назад

    Very good review. Thank you.

  • @alfioorlando7559
    @alfioorlando7559 3 года назад +4

    dude, this isn’t the first in-line perpetual wristwatch… there has been one from Greubel Forsey, one from Roger Dubuis and many others

    • @watchesinsingapore
      @watchesinsingapore  3 года назад +3

      thanks for the correction! Indeed, seems like the information I pulled from a Deployant article was mistaken. Appreciate it.

    • @GoodToCU88
      @GoodToCU88 3 года назад

      Thank you Mr. Wikipedia

  • @southnc63
    @southnc63 3 года назад +1

    The movement is a modified version of one that was made exclusively for the 5235 Regulator Annual. The only differences are small bridge changes, 4HZ (vs 3.2) and platinum (vs gold) micro rotor. In terms of simplicity, I think Moser has that one locked up. Regardless, I agree it is far more special than the redressed sports models.

    • @watchesinsingapore
      @watchesinsingapore  3 года назад +2

      The movement has also been modified to fit in the in-line perpetual mechanism. While the dialside of Moser's perpetual calendars are arguable more simple, they also don't show the day of the week, and the leap year is at the back. Personally, I also prefer the symmetry of the 5236.

    • @southnc63
      @southnc63 3 года назад +1

      @@watchesinsingapore Some good points. However, I think most would prefer the leap year to be on the back, since it is hardly ever used, but still required.

  • @XHobbiesPrime
    @XHobbiesPrime 3 года назад +2

    This is gorgeous.

  • @elvisahmed
    @elvisahmed Год назад +2

    Beautiful watch complicated yet simple looking

  • @mahmoudkalef8427
    @mahmoudkalef8427 Год назад +1

    Beautiful 😍

  • @corasephora
    @corasephora 3 года назад

    So much to learn🤓

  • @vladansretenovic1952
    @vladansretenovic1952 3 года назад +2

    What a watch!!!

  • @juicedupjunkie2324
    @juicedupjunkie2324 3 года назад

    please work on the video thumbnail and intro. these are very important because your content and information are great. just need polishing up. keep up the great work

  • @Milofchg
    @Milofchg 3 года назад +2

    That full date day window visually takes away from the rest of a refined dress watch. This display is suitable for a sport watch. If Patek could refine it a bit or just go back to an old method of a day date display then that works. It seems like it was a last minute design decision. Maybe to show off the complication. It looks like it was just thrown in. Doesn’t look like it’s a part of the watch. The design doesn’t flow in other words.

    • @watchesinsingapore
      @watchesinsingapore  3 года назад +2

      I think the goal of having the large diameter, brushed blue dial, cold metal, and sharp case was to edge this watch towards being more of a casual one, rather than a refined dress watch.
      But yeah, I can definitely see where you're coming from on the in-line date display. It's something I wasn't a big fan of when I saw the pictures initially. But after seeing the watch in person and wearing it for a few weeks, it's actually something I quite enjoy.

  • @TallerSartorial
    @TallerSartorial 3 года назад

    Good video. New suscriber. CHEERS

  • @meepcheep314
    @meepcheep314 3 года назад

    sadly it is 150,000 dollars :(