This is the best and most understandable video description of Lawrence Kohlberg's morality I've found on youtube so far, the others are just all over the place. Intention is very important as to why a person breaks a rule to steal something, as Siddhartha Gautama pointed out. However I'm still interested in understanding what stage of moral development the morally-stunted or incapable are at as adults, such as social justice warriors, Antifa, and other fascist totalitarians like them who don't care at all about lying to and harming others to reach their goal, out of pure ideology, even when all the facts to a healthy society they discover go against their view. In some cases these people admit they "Just want to watch the world burn". So which moral stage is that?
Let's apply this to Americans in the US who are against undocumented people living in their country, Keen on the exclusion. Where do they fall in this navigation of moral development when they care for rules and regulations over the quality of these peoples lives?
I did not like this presentation. The presenter didn't even address the negative answers. There is a "Heinz should have not broken into the pharmacy because..." line of reasoning for each of the stages, and each stage can be subdivided in 2, so there are actually 6 proposed lines of reasoning for each negative/positive answer. And the gender bias explanation doesn't make any sense... Even the wikipedia article is better than this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinz_dilemma
Very good teacher, nice calligraphy as well.
This is the best and most understandable video description of Lawrence Kohlberg's morality I've found on youtube so far, the others are just all over the place.
Intention is very important as to why a person breaks a rule to steal something, as Siddhartha Gautama pointed out.
However I'm still interested in understanding what stage of moral development the morally-stunted or incapable are at as adults, such as social justice warriors, Antifa, and other fascist totalitarians like them who don't care at all about lying to and harming others to reach their goal, out of pure ideology, even when all the facts to a healthy society they discover go against their view. In some cases these people admit they "Just want to watch the world burn". So which moral stage is that?
The Heinz dilemma: the pharmaceutical companies in the USA. The same that lobby at the Capitol.
Watching all the way from the UAE. Thank you loads for the explanations & tips (:
I'm thinking more along the lines of: If he goes to jail, his wife will still die and he won't be there to save her or care for her anymore.
Thanks for simplifying this theory Mr. Byrd. :)
This is really helpful.
Thank you so much! I have a test on Kohlberg's theory and your video helped me memorize it better.
Let's apply this to Americans in the US who are against undocumented people living in their country, Keen on the exclusion. Where do they fall in this navigation of moral development when they care for rules and regulations over the quality of these peoples lives?
Outstanding Video! Thanks!
# get Mr Byrd a tripod
-proposed by my history teacher
Thank you so much for this explanation.
Awesome video Sir! really helpful thanks a lot
Good in every aspect, Thank You
Thanks for your presentation, it is really helpful for me.
Thank you Sir!
short and sweet.....!!
best explanation
THANK YOU!!!!!
Thanks for the tutorial sir
Can you teach us something about Carol Gilligan's theory thank you in advance.
I would like to know your thoughts on Moors.
Thanks, the best explication.
very helpful video
Kohlberg does not take into account cultural values.
Copy sir nice vedio
nice to see thing get some work after the addams family.
I did not like this presentation. The presenter didn't even address the negative answers. There is a "Heinz should have not broken into the pharmacy because..." line of reasoning for each of the stages, and each stage can be subdivided in 2, so there are actually 6 proposed lines of reasoning for each negative/positive answer. And the gender bias explanation doesn't make any sense...
Even the wikipedia article is better than this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinz_dilemma