Whitney Harris (2001) on Rudolf Hoess
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 фев 2015
- Whitney Harris, Nuremberg Trial prosecutor, describes his interview with Auschwitz commandant, Rudolf Hoess; the introduction of the evidence into the Trial and reaction to the personality of Hoess.
For further information, see www.roberthjackson.org
Whitney was a very honorable man. They don't make men like Whitney anymore we need more of Whitney's in today's Wacky World. May God continue to give him Eternal peace
There's his actual testimony in German available on the internet. He sounds very different then in the movie.
Oh yeah the actor is sincerely a better hoss than hoss
I hope these monsters are being tormented for all eternity.
I really appreciate the work of this Channel of sharing these videos on RUclips, BUT it could have edited the video by copying the audio of the left channel to the right channel. This would have made listening sooo much better. 🎧😊
what's going on in the background?
My thoughts exactly.... near the end of the interview it sounds like some one is tapping on a small nail
when was this taped?
June 1997 by BBC
It’s funny to me because he wasn’t the person to actually first think to use cyclone b. He even says it in his memoir….
Its a movie... they have to fit it all into the scene and dont have time for "context" or facts.
This is not what you find in the archives- Russian, Polish or German.
You would not have found a British General being so flippant when talking about such a serious issue.
Rudolf Höss admitted that "There are methods by which any confession can be obtained, whether it is true or not. "
And the methods applied to Hoess elicited the truth from without causing him significant mental or physical pain, unless you consider confronting him with the truth of his crimes torture.
What film is that?
It's called 'Nurenberg" Starring Alec Baldwin. It came out in 2000
No sound.
There are a lot of Holocaust deniers in this comment section. *Spits on the ground*
Interesting
In 2000, the kom'andatur (`Ausc'hwitz headq'uarters report) were discovered. There are excerpts in the book T ell the Tru'th and Sha'me the Dev'il by Ge'rard Men'uhin, pages 1 7 through nineteen.
It took two days to delouse clothing with that product and it had to be heated at 25C to work properly.
Maybe you're not aware of the differences between lice and humans. Humans have lungs. Insects do not.
I remember someone making the same argument about a factory near my town... for their brochure, they showed they had beehives nearby... as if healthy bees meant the factory could not be the cause of lung problems in the men who worked there and the people who lived downwind.
@@jimbobeire Zyklon B was a special commercial preparation containing hydrocyanic acid. The name "Zyklon B" was only the
trade name, the active ingredient was called either Prussic Acid or Hydrocyanide. HCN was prepared at the factory and delivered absorbed in a porous
carrier, either wood pulp or diatomaceous earth (chalk). It was supplied either in discoids or snippets or pellets.
This preparation was sealed in an airtight can which required a special can opener. In this form the HCN - Zyklon B was much safer and easier to handle. The discoids, snippets or pellets had to be spread on the floor of the area to be fumigated or utilized in a chamber which circulated and heated the air within the chamber in excess of 78.3 degrees Fahrenheit (25.7 degrees Centigrade). If used in buildings, ships, or tents, the area must be heated to an excess of 78.3 degrees Fahrenheit, the boiling point of HCN. Failure to do this will result in a much longer time to complete the fumigation. Fumigation takes a minimum of 24 to 48 hours. After the fumigation, the ventilation of the area must take a minimum of ten hours, depending on the location
(and volume). Longer if the building has no windows or exhaust fans. The fumigated area must then be chemically tested using prepared paper strips for the presence of gas before entering.
Complete chemical suits MUST be worn to prevent poisoning through the skin. The warmer the temperature and the drier the location, the faster and safer the handling will be. For every disinfestation, a disinfestation team will be used, consisting of at least 2 men. The gassing leader is responsible for the gassing. His duties include particularly inspection, aeration, giving the all clear and safety measures. The orders of the gassing leader should be obeyed without hesitation.
Untrained personnel or trained personnel without a certificate should not be used for gassing operations. Such persons also should not be allowed to enter a room filled with gas. The gassing leader should know where his personnel are at all times. All personnel should be able to prove at all times that they possess official authorization to use Prussic acid for disinfestation of pests
"Commandant" is too dignified a name for Rudolf Hoess ! How about "Ring-leader ?" or "Big Fish" ?
Hoess got what he deserved. That said - ...why wasn't "Beria&Co." on the bench of the accused either?
For the same reason that the British officials were never in the dock for creating a famine in Ireland, nor the famine in Bengal killing millions, nor that the US was never in the dock for giving tuberculosis to the native Indians, or dropping agent orange on the Vietnamese. Nor Leopold II for his crimes in the Congo, Nor Mao in China.
If you're still in power, you don't go in the dock. If you lose power, you can be held accountable, and dance on the end of a rope, like Saddam Hussein. He should have faced justice when he oppressed his own people, gassed the Kurds, etc... but during his worst crimes, the west continued to supply him with intel, and chemicals to make his chemical weapons.
Once he became more useful out of power, then the unpunished crimes of the past caught up with him... but without mention of how the powers that hanged him, had previously supported him.
Titled, not entitled.
It's amazing how the prescene of an extra O in your name can amplify your evil by a factor of 10.
Llpp0lpp00lpplll
L
Ok90lo
Interesting to note that Rudolf Hoess signed a full confession in English. This is pretty outstanding considering he didnt even speak English let alone read or write it. NOT saying he wasnt guilty or anything like that. I just find it " odd"
He also was given a German translation in German to sign at the same time.
@@hunterfisher1294 He does not mention that in his autobiography. Only that he was given a document written in English and told that if he didn't sign it his wife and children would be handed over to the Russians. The British do acknowledge that they told him that. If he was given a German translation why didn't he see that they named a camp that didn't exist ? I just find it odd that when the man was so obviously guilty, why did they use " unorthodox" means.
It's safe to say that there is no TRUE CLEAR and ABSOLUTE transparency on the actual facts that took place during this time in history.......sure we have the publicly accepted story......but that's all that is.
@@aliroseable......and your education solely relies on data and facts that were spoon fed to you and when you graduated from the school of the fake propaganda machine they said good boy here's your bone ( your worthless paper diploma)........pat yourself on the back your an educated idiot.
@@Eddie-In-Las-Vegas well said. Truth fears no investigation!
Bu bu but.. what about the Japanese they were wrose.. lets blame them more!
That movie has never happend.
The scenes shown in the film have been over- heavily dramatized. The testimony by Hoess - though not its delivery - is authentic. Whitney Harris - very near to death in the above interview - was at the trial, and asked many of the questions.
@@RobertJonesWightpaint Hitler himself could not convince holocaust deniers.
@@Mike-01234 lol well said
What is there to laugh about here I don’t find it funny
says the comically redundant catIadÿ to the nuremberg prosecutor
The long suppressed story of the worst m assacre in the history of the world.The devastation of D resden was one of those c rimes against humanity whose authors would have been arraigned at Nuremberg had that court had not been perverted.(Rt. Hon.Richard H.S. Crossman,MP, Labour's Government Minister. )
Dresden bombing is well known, just like the German destruction of Poland, Russia, Ukraine, etc and he destruction of China , Philippines , Korea by the Japanese and the dropping of atomic bomb by US.
Dresden was to stop the Nazis from exterminating millions more civilians.
Haris
In a closed meeting of I sra'eli journalists and diplo'mats, a speaker for the I sra'eli embassy in Germany declared, that it was in the best interest of I s'rael to maintain h o lo caust s ensitivity among Germans...as Haa'retz further reported, the speaker said in clear words that Is rael had an interest in maintaining German f eelings of g uilt. -T ell the `T ruth and `S hame the `D evil by `Ger'ard `Men'uhin page 4 3.
Damn, managed to make something from 2006 look like 1995
Untrue
HHhahahahahha there’s always one idiot that denies a genocide
Hoss went to confession to a priest before he was hanged
Not forgiven has G-d said to Hoess
Mr. Hoess is so brazen, so matter of fact.
Greatest killers of mankind?? How about Churchill - Bengal Famine( a man made famine)
There's little doubt that Churchill viewed those on the sub-continents as inferior - as did pretty much everybody at the time. Food and supplies were prioritized for the military given that it was in the middle of WW2.
Even so the maximum amount of deaths is 3 million, so still far less than what the Nazis, Soviets or Mao's China did. Not that we should be comparing tragedies
You don't see any difference between a policy failure and sweeping up civilians and executing them by gas?
Read David Irving’s book on Churchill- the warmonger who lost the British Empire.
@@ianbrackenridge1724Right
Read David Irving, the notorious and pseudo-intellectual holocaust denier.
Your comment adds nothing to Churchill's complicity in the man made famine in India during the Second World War which remains painfully overlooked by Westerners.
The victor tells the tale.
What would possibly be the tale of the loser
@@Avi-tc2ym
Let's see; Germany and Japan started an aggressive and cruel war, they both had their countries destroyed. Now they cry that they are the victim.
@@kurtvonfricken6829 My thoughts exactly
@@kurtvonfricken6829 Britain and France declared war on Germany. It seems you have no knowledge of this subject.
@@sobbyhasselhoff And Germany invaded the USSR (which had signed a peace treaty with Germany in 1939) without a declaration of war in 1941. Also the Nazis declared war on the US in December of 1941 in hopes of getting the Japanese to declare war on the USSR. The Nazis were opportunistic pricks. Oh and by the way France and the UK had warned Germany not to invade Poland or it would be considered an act of war. Hitler didn't think that they would do it.
The victor writes the story!!
But that doesn't mean what is written is false. In this case what the Nazis did was tragically true.
the greatest killer of all time is the British empire
Darren Walshe - what spurious bile you gullible empty headed children spew. Did your university education enlighten and embitter you against the British empire? Money well spent for such a naive, useless cretin like yourself. Rot away you loathsome lemming.
I disagree..The main goal of the British Empire was to gain wealth for Britain. You don't do that by killing the locals. Much better to exploit them and use them to steal their own natural resources.
I think Stalin takes that title.
Darren Walsh. Is a brain dead idiot ...
Mao killed more.