Ventrimedia 2K FPV Test Footage

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 фев 2025

Комментарии • 7

  • @perfectlylonely
    @perfectlylonely 11 лет назад +1

    How much better can this get? Looks sharp. Color and contrast are excellent. Cinematic.

    • @dslack67
      @dslack67  11 лет назад

      Well, it looks so much better on my computer due to RUclips compression that I'm still not sure if going 2K is that much better over 1080p. At 30fps I get varying degrees of CMOS rolling shutter which I have to edit out and/or correct during post, which is a pain. I'll probably just end up flying and shooting both right after each other. Then use the best of both. haha.

    • @perfectlylonely
      @perfectlylonely 11 лет назад

      Dave Slack
      You're a glutton for punishment.

  • @zypher2011
    @zypher2011 11 лет назад

    Looks good to me, with the low altitude video for sure. How about lower and close up?

  • @dhardjono
    @dhardjono 11 лет назад

    Have you put nd filter film on your protective lens cover to cut down the light to slow down the shutter.

  • @iFlyAerial
    @iFlyAerial 11 лет назад

    2k looks sharp, looks like you tried to slow the footage down. Sharpness2k vs 1080/60fps?/slow motion. It depends on what you are doing I guess.

    • @dslack67
      @dslack67  11 лет назад

      Yes it does look sharp. I couldn't slow the footage down due to being shot at 30fps and I don't have Twixtor, so slowing it down doesn't give good results. I just flew real slowly knowing that I was shooting in 30fps. With that said, I had some rolling shutter which I attempted to remove in post editing, that is most likely what you're seeing for sure. You're spot on though, I think it depends on what I'm going to be doing and flight conditions. If it's at all windy, well then, I'm going 1080p 60fps as windy conditions really produce more rolling shutter jello at 2K 30fps. Thanks for the reply's guys, much appreciate the thoughts.