I had to stop watching at 13:44 when he said that no one would doubt the art direction. It just feels like gaslighting at this point to try and make us accept these horrendous xe/xirs as being perfectly normal character design.
Not glazing OW but OW : has gorilla, hamster, robots and human as characters Concord : trash bin, human, fat human, human dipped in paint Which one is more diverse i wonder
When a game is a hero shooter, they need to sell you on the characters and there's nothing interesting about this cast, like a collection of background star wars extras
wait a frigging moment? for real? i thought this game is gonna be free 2 play lol that game is gonna die so hard and then they are gonna make it free 2 play anyway to save it lol
Yeah but it actually ships with content? Valorant came out with 3 maps and 6 heroes and 2 modes. OW came out with 7 maps and how many heroes? Not 16. Concord ships with 6 game modes, 12 maps and 16 characters. It's huge content that I'll always prefer over F2P. F2P completely killed quality in MP games.
Which means it also requires PS+ subscription, unlike all of its main competitors. The only way for this game to have a somewhat decent player base on consoles is including it on PS+ catalog day one. Like they did with Destruction Allstars (remember that banger, guys? anyone?) or Foamstars (crickets...)
tf2 is character based.just go look at the meet the team trailers that are heavily based on the characters.battlefield doesint have characters for its multiplayer
The main problem is that there seems to be nothing about this game that stands out. Nowhere you go, "oh that is a cool mechanic I have not seen before, I have to try this".
I would need to either play or watch abilities breakdowns to be sure but so far a lot of the abilities I saw look genuinely interesting. Gameplay wise it looks really good. What's holding it back for me is the live service aspect and it's art direction not being quite there yet.
@@namelessking9068 3 months and it’s dead like foamstar & destruction all star. Needs to be F2P & on every damn platform @ launch to stand a chance. But I guess Sony like Failing at live service.
@@krazyd0nut404 maybe its better for playstation and the fans, that this game fails. i want AAA single player games like last of us, god of war and ghost of tsushima from sony. not games as a service like this
We lived on a era where we have to pay money for a game and THEN have to pay for microtransactions,season passes, and daily challengers and some games even got in game ads
I know this is wholly subjective, but the gameplay and characters just don't look very *cool* to me; Concord's got all the aesthetic appeal of a saltine cracker.
@@SD78 That's totally fine, I don't really care what race or gender or BMI my playable character is, but they could have at least made the characters look cool. The ugliness isn't from ideology, they're trying to sell skins.
They ditched the fan service/ sexy and musclular characters for average/bloated looking ones. They are so bland and unappealing. No one wants to buy different skins for a 4/10 dude or girl or…… “them”
The characters kinda look like people in costumes. Maybe a little TOO realistic. Some "hero shooters" like Overwatch have a distinct silhouette and striking design (or some primary color you can associate the character with) that lets the opponent know at a glance who they're facing. Other than a few I'm seeing, all these guys just look like, well, people at a glance. Sure, in the real world, a shooter is just somebody with a gun and you might not know what they're doing until it's too late, but this is a video game and visual shorthand is needed for ease of play.
Silhouettes are important in hero shooters, look at TF2 - at a glance you can tell what character you're shooting at, even if they're wearing 50 million cosmetics
Im not so much concerned with the gameplay implications, but I do agree that the character designs are very boring and lack personality. "People in costumes" is a pretty good summary, they dont look like individual unique characters.. They just look like people.
As someone who doesn’t really play these kinds of games, I will say that OverWatch, League of Legends and even Apex Legends to an extent have good character designs. At worse, there’s the ODD character who looks generic. Here… everyone does
Specifically for hero shooters, you need to get some inkling of the person you're fighting at a glance. Like COD, who cares, every operator has access to everything in that game before you head into a match. But every kit for a hero shooter character is different. If the sniper looks the same as the close-quarters brawler, it's just a recipe for confusion.
Soooooo, THIS is why we heard Sonys big bombastic plans of live service games and going “all in” blew up in their face. I think they could see the writing on the wall. In all honesty, Sony needs to stick to what they are good at and triple down on AAA singleplayer games, and let Bungie do their thing since they are proven with Destiny. This is 5 years to late.
The scary thing is that this is one of the 6 out of 12 live service games that Sony thinks is good enough to go ahead, which makes you wonder how dogshit games like that live service TLOU must have been.
characters look so bland. I can't even explain why. They're supposed to be cool and quirky considering amount of detail but they're just not. Feels like budget cosplay
The major problem is the lack of any sort of thematic cohesion. None of these characters look like they actually belong together. From the alien pink haired girl to space bun galore. It's all a mess of themes with no unifying style or theme. Overwatch has this same problem, though there is still some cohesion. some characters are of the same crew. (Talon, Overwatch, Vishkar). Some are individual mercenaries of some caliber. They do recognize one another in some shape or form so it doesn't feel too weird. The characters are built around their combat style and talents. Some of Concord's characters.. if not majority of them just don't have anything that tells you enough about what they excel at. What does pink haired alien girl tells you when you look at her? How about the Prince-wannabe Mcree? Only the tank characters really scream "I'm a bullet sponge".
@@redninja3056 personally they all have really bland faces as in they have no distinctive features. I think their silhouettes and proportions should be pushed more for some characters. The ideas are there, I think they should commit more to them and exaggerate their traits a little more imho.
The transition from matchmaking to actually landing in the arena gives you *just* about enough time to take a dump, fulfil your Duolingo lesson for the day, ponder your terrible life choices before realising being sat on the toilet's actually quite relaxing, wipe thoroughly, finish up, grab a beer and jump in!
I can't get over how stupendously ugly this game is. How did it ever go to release looking like this? Everything about it is aesthetically offensive. There is nothing remotely appealing about this game.
@@semmertFym the industry has always been like that Minecraft is a copy from an old game, Tetris was a copy from a puzzle, Stardew Valley was a Harvest Moon copy, OW is a copy from TF There is no type of media that is 'original', either they are derived or inspired in something else
Blueberry is a Destiny term for a random player you matched with, and the game looks like the crucible from destiny, made by former bungie devs. So blueberry is accurate here
Joss whedon made one good avengers movie and tbh its mid compared to anything the ruso brothers did. He also ruined justice league. Maybe having whedon writing is why it sucks
Fortnite, CS2, The Finals, and Warzone are all free. Left 4 Dead 2 and Payday 2 are 10 bucks, but they are worth it. Online games should be at most $20.
They got away with it with hell divers. Someone at Sony wet themselves when they saw this and bought the studio. The question is what did they see that none of us seem to be?
Those games are free with iverpriced mtx. Helldivers was 40 with the msot respectabke mtx weve ever seen. If this game follows that logic, it would warrant the 40 like helldivers did.
Title reminds me of Kojima posts after he went to cinema where if he liked movie he writes several paragraphs about it and if he’s not he just says that he watched it
*tinfoil hat on* That's the point. to explain it more simply, didn't earn it is a thing because several large lending companies demand it as part of their loan agreements. Many large companies in entertainment operate for months on losses so they "need" those loans to not go into the red while working on their next project. Under US tax law, companies can write off losses in their taxes. and just like that, you have a cobra problem (more literally, perverse incentive). Rather than trying to make a GOOD game that MIGHT be successful on the market, you can make an absolutely terrible game, do a fucking shit job marketing it, ensure you hire the most pathetic (cheap) dev team that hate gamers; utterly ensuring the game will fail... Now you the game company can just churn out mediocre garbage, subsisting on didn't earn it loans, and tax writ offs... it's literally easier to make shit, ensure it fails, and cash out on your taxes than it is to try to make something good.
I never seen any games with less appealing characters rosters until now, they even make big hulking robot looks boring The artstyle too realistic, making everyone looks dull and ugly
You can go for a realistic artstyle and still be able to make interesting characters (look at the characters from paragon for examlple) The issue here are the designs themselves. Theres literally nothing that tells you about who the characters are and their personality. The most important thing for characters is the silohuette and here it doesnt tell you anything about them because they all look alike
You need to make it as easy as possible to on-board people with stuff like this. Making it free to play with reasonable cosmetic transactions is a good way to go. Lose a bit of money short term for more success later
It's like Guardians of the Galaxy crossed with the Burger King Kids Club and the "quirky" side of reddit, and then ODed on soy Also, that victory transition/screen is so boring
I see a lot of comments bringing up Helldivers success but not realizing that Helldivers came out as a completely fleshed out and well-made game, and concord looks like a fanfiction of overwatch.
Orisa in overwatch has 1500 effective health when using fortify. Mcree does 70 per damage with a 6 shooter. 70 x 6 is 420, mcree would take 3 mags and fortify negates headshot damage headshots.
@@KidArkx Orisa is arguably the tankiest Character in the whole game. Her whole kit is being a bullet sponge. And McCree is not the hero with the most damage. So this comparison is not really accurate. In this game, even the 220 HP characters eat like 2-3 mags
The concept of doing weekly story-driven cut scenes has piqued my interest, but you need actual characters to carry them and not DEI stereotype flashcards. Also, I bet that Bazz's pom-pom hair has a hitbox, doesn't it?
- soaked in woke - ugly characters - boring viscous gameplay - paid I think online will die within a couple of months. if the cancelled "Last of Us Online" was cancelled for this, I'm extremely interested in how much worse it was?...
Yeah, he said that and I was just baffled. The art direction, both how the game is literally rendered and also the artistic choices for the aesthetic, looks bland at best and offputting at worst. My eyes aren't bleeding in my sockets, but I do indeed seriously doubt the art direction.
16:32 let me think of a number of different combo of weapon ideas you could give in order to make unique archetypes. Cassidy change up idea; trick shots, switch out different ammo types to perform different shot types to become a Utility/ DPS or even shoot to make temp cover. Windowmaker change up; Instead of a grappling hook give her the following; 1. Teleporter that allows her to have a point a to point b 2. A rope and hook you have to throw, allowing you to traverse only based on where you climb and make your own sniping points 3. Make a structure below you, making your own sniping nest 4. Super jump 5. Double jump 6. Flight BUT can't snipe while flying Tracer change up; 1. Shotgun like the scout from TF2 2. Needle gun 3. Daggers 4. Energy cannon like Megaman Oh wow that wasn't hard to do now was it. That took me like what less than 5 minutes to think of all of these changes? If you can't think of any creative ideas and only steal from existing archetypes then you might just need to quit being a game designer all together. 16:49 TF2 was able to come up with unique combination of heroes with guns. Stop licking the sack of the game and just accept the fact the team behind this game aren't all that creative.
Evolution is what got us here. The only way to stop this instance of evolution is to terminate all of humanity. Which is… not ideal… so I recommend adapting
@@phillemon7664 Nah... evolution is... look thats a woman / man I can tell just by looking at them. But now they want to force arbitrary speech onto me, that can and will change in the blink of an eye (depending on how this "person" feels). Or I risk getting fined up to 10.000€, if it gets passed in Germany. -> This is Devolution
@@phillemon7664 it’s cultural evolution, not biological. Wouldn’t take much to get rid of it - downfall of America, rise of Islam, destruction of extreme leftist ideology, basic education ahead of propaganda in the media/schools
And that they need to aim it to the majority PS/XB/PC users when their budget surpasses the 8 digits. Majority male gamers. A game made for the rainbows and pronouns and the Y-chromosome-less is a game that's not made for the striaght male majority.
I'm a very simple person. I see ideology I don't agree with put in the center stage of a game... I'm out. Will not buy this even if it's the best game ever. I honestly want to understand how is it so important to put pronouns that big next to the class of the character. Like, who the hell cares its pronouns, it's a freaking video game character. But I get that, they put it there to fight the ideologic war on the internet. So, yeah, I'm not spending money to suport this studio.
@@joedouglas6968 It's clear you didn't understand my comment. In a video game (especially a shooter), nobody cares if a character it's a "he/him" or a "it/its". Thats why it should not be put literally as a major information in the character selection. Doing that, is 100% about ideology. They are activists pandering to the woke people. To the progressive people. Virtue signaling. It lireally can't be more obvious with the pronouns right there, bro, come on. And I, basically, don't agree with that. So, for this reason, I'll not give this game a try.
These character designs... i just can't. There's like three or four that are somewhat "ok" but even then that would just be me picking them because all the other alternatives are WAY worse.
*I never had played a Hero Shooter before* I liked the game, the graphics are great and i enjoyed the guns and diferent types of gameplay. I don't like all the characters designs, but there are 16 options, i think it's ok to dislike some of them. And i don't know how to explain but, this game looks like garbage on videos and gameplays, playing it, feels much better.
I tried it last night. It wants to focus on Overwatch style gameplay, where teams group up most of the time (for healing & DPS). But on Arena style maps (not lane maps)... So it doesn't flow well. It'll be DOA imo...
It has characters that prioritise support, like healing others, focusing on team play & no health regen. Just to name a few. It has A LOT of similarities with Overwatch. It merges Overwatch elements with Arena shooters, and it fails at it...
The characters in this game look like they’re from Saints Row and Fortnite. (Not a good thing at all) what happened to having cool looking characters in games?
i might be wrong, but this looks a game that will fade out quickly into obscurity. Might have some initial attention, but quickly everyone forgetting it exists
I am a freelance designer and I think the art style is great and it has amazing animations with a unique colour scheme that not many games dare to use. Still wouldn't pay to play something like that though.
@rellocozy3261 well art is almost entirely subjective. I also don't care for the art design. Graphically it looks fine. I'm not interested in the characters.
I honestly could not give two shits about these types of games. The trailer was cool, when I thought it was a single player game, or even co-op. But once i realized what it was, my interest went out the window, as it did for all my friends in the group chat that were talking about the reveal.
The CGI trailer intrigued because it looked like a GotG and Star Wars mix which are my two favourite franchises of all time and i thought it would be a coop game. Then they showed the gameplay and immediately I lost interest
I remember a conversation about art design that when you have to broad of a concept and a consistent logic you can easily lack identity. Startreak is a great example as it’s alien deign is humans with funny head features, not the most specific but it works well enough. Like marvel this game seems to drawn it inspiration with from a lot of different places without much logic as to why they all exist together.
The most accurate comment was when someone said "this looks like a game kids would play in the background of a movie"
Jimmy before Micheal smashed his TV be like
While using a “QBox” controller that isn’t an Xbox controller but looks like an Xbox controller because licensing
thats a good thing
@@ruok3351is it?
LOL
you know the character designs are bad when the best design is the robot and it’s a yellow michelin man
Usually when it comes to Character Designs, Robots end up being the last chance if all other designs suck.
They somehow screwed up the last chance.
All the designs in this game look like someone pressed the randomise button in the character creator.
The developers went to Walmart and selected people at random to be the characters
Oh believe me, there's NOTHING random about them/they
if you have not notice yet its the color of the gey rainbow flag
@@19Marksman79it's an insult to Walmart people.
I had to stop watching at 13:44 when he said that no one would doubt the art direction. It just feels like gaslighting at this point to try and make us accept these horrendous xe/xirs as being perfectly normal character design.
For a sci-fi setting, all of the alien designs look so... uninspired.
They just look like real humans cosplaying.
The pink haired one, jesus
Not glazing OW but
OW : has gorilla, hamster, robots and human as characters
Concord : trash bin, human, fat human, human dipped in paint
Which one is more diverse i wonder
@@quanlinglingdingle6122 Yeah, OW always had great design. I'm just bored of the game after playing it for 2-3 years in OW1 so I don't play OW2.
Probably because the devs took too much inspiration from Guardians of the Galaxy.
"Nobody's questioning the art direction"
I'm questioning the art direction
Yeah same here, characters look like shit
When a game is a hero shooter, they need to sell you on the characters and there's nothing interesting about this cast, like a collection of background star wars extras
@@patchedart A Guaridans of the Galaxy in Star Wars fanfic.
all the aliens are just humans with non-human skin coloration
it's hilarious, like watching 60's Star Trek
How did they manage to make a robot look ugly
The biggest point is that the game costs $40 and has MTX. All of its competitors are free to play. I don't see this lasting
wait a frigging moment? for real? i thought this game is gonna be free 2 play lol that game is gonna die so hard and then they are gonna make it free 2 play anyway to save it lol
Yeah but it actually ships with content?
Valorant came out with 3 maps and 6 heroes and 2 modes.
OW came out with 7 maps and how many heroes? Not 16.
Concord ships with 6 game modes, 12 maps and 16 characters. It's huge content that I'll always prefer over F2P.
F2P completely killed quality in MP games.
@patrickbetar2943 ain't that the truth, this game could definitely be ass but F2P games just feel flat.
@@godot1785 Just play Destiny Pvp it's the same
Which means it also requires PS+ subscription, unlike all of its main competitors. The only way for this game to have a somewhat decent player base on consoles is including it on PS+ catalog day one. Like they did with Destruction Allstars (remember that banger, guys? anyone?) or Foamstars (crickets...)
The awesome Concord universe, where everyone is equally ugly.
......
(Im giggling)
@@fadlanibrahim9866I don't know why but the way i read your comment it sounded extremely cute. So, I love you.
"Overwatch had a chance to do it before anyone else."
TF2: Am I a joke to you?
TF1:
@@alejandrocoy5405technically not a game by itself
TF2 is not a hero shooter, it's class-based. Was Battlefield a hero shooter too?
🤡
tf2 is character based.just go look at the meet the team trailers that are heavily based on the characters.battlefield doesint have characters for its multiplayer
The main problem is that there seems to be nothing about this game that stands out. Nowhere you go, "oh that is a cool mechanic I have not seen before, I have to try this".
The dodging, on some characters it's like you're playing a souls game, it's pretty fun and not something I've seen from a hero shooter yet
As a non hero shooter player all this is new to me and there are probably more like me out there than we think
@@omiewearnkhakis9780 I mean, all those players can also try any other of the 10 hero shooters for free too
I would need to either play or watch abilities breakdowns to be sure but so far a lot of the abilities I saw look genuinely interesting.
Gameplay wise it looks really good. What's holding it back for me is the live service aspect and it's art direction not being quite there yet.
@@Gerbil-vm1fpand they have their pronouns in bio. So a big plus for anyone who subscribes to radical gender theory.
The character designs look like a bunch of cosplayers walked into a lobby.
After eating an entire buffet
Kinda look like ethnic rip-offs of more popular characters.
Family guy mexican superman vibes
A bunch of cosplayers from California.
Cheap cosplayers
Tin foil hat is on: Sell for 40 beans, few months down the line turn it free to play and 'reward' early adopters some skins
No need to wear that hat. Betting on a corpo to be that level of slime is always a winner.
The Suicide Squad gambit, not bad
They did that with rocket league to.
I couldn't care if this game was the best shooter on earth, its character designs are easily the worst of all time.
$40 for a pvp fps that is gonna be monetized like a F2P game is crazy
Sony.
give it 3 months and it will be free 2 play
@@namelessking9068 3 months and it’s dead like foamstar & destruction all star. Needs to be F2P & on every damn platform @ launch to stand a chance. But I guess Sony like
Failing at live service.
@@krazyd0nut404 maybe its better for playstation and the fans, that this game fails. i want AAA single player games like last of us, god of war and ghost of tsushima from sony. not games as a service like this
@@krazyd0nut404I bet you said the exact same thing about Helldivers 🤦
"Talks in cursive" cracked me up the second I heard the guy speak.
Hearing it really helped because I was like 🤔 and then I heard it and cracked up
Teo is a Spanish name, he speaks with a Spanish accent
Spanish legit speak fast. Can be hard for English speakers to keep up.
It's a nice metaphor for "talks with his mouth closed"
Making a game like this in 2024 and have it not be Free to play is a death sentence. It's become the standard for the genre at this point.
It's not f2p, but it has pronouns. You can't have everything.
"Character models look really good"
Do you have eyes?
The fact that this was PlayStations “big “ reveal of the summer
Sony is a console for modern audiences. Aka no one. Too many LGBT games
@@Mark-sd4hv Funny considering PS5 has so many AMAZING games. Do I really need to name all the masterpieces they have?
@coopstain1728 yes name all the ps5 only exclusive games that are first party I'll wait lol
@@Mark-sd4hvand Xbox is a console for no audience lol have you seen the sales?
@@Myinnerthoughts-88 Name Xbox-only first party games. Oh, wait, Xbox is basically just a subscription at this point.
We lived on a era where we have to pay money for a game and THEN have to pay for microtransactions,season passes, and daily challengers and some games even got in game ads
And you have to pay for PSN to get access to multiplayer + internet bill
@@woldemunster9244bad comparison
This is why I've been sticking to the many, many great boomer shooters that have been coming lately instead. Helldivers 2 is pretty solid too.
People let games play them now, rather than we play them
@@woldemunster9244 F2P games don't require PSN.
For free to play games you do not need playstation+ so this game actually cost significantly more than 40$ compared to its competitors
I didn't know companies were competing to create the ugliest game possible. Looks like a good way to burn 100 million dollars away.
I know this is wholly subjective, but the gameplay and characters just don't look very *cool* to me; Concord's got all the aesthetic appeal of a saltine cracker.
I dunno those crackers pretty sleek
I'd argue the saltine is more appealing.
@@Quandry1Especially with a upset stomach 😅
They were designed to fit diversity quotas and ideology.
@@SD78 That's totally fine, I don't really care what race or gender or BMI my playable character is, but they could have at least made the characters look cool.
The ugliness isn't from ideology, they're trying to sell skins.
Paid AND with "micro" transactions because not even the game knows what it is.
Thats why it has to state its pronouns.
dead/arrival
It's a free-to-buy, buy-to-play, pay-to-use, transaction-to-win, corporate money-generating product. Or something like that.
@@craycoco7747 ok I dont mind the pronouns thing, but that joke was good
@@Brindlebrother or like sterling said: it's a fee-2-pay, you pay for the privilege of paying even more!
Jesus Christ. The roster screams Current year "Modern Audience" the game.
Yeah, this 🔼
ah yes the classic "modern audience" that doesnt exist
Which would be fine if the designs were actually interesting, which they are not.
@@MaMastoastno it wouldn't be fine.
They ditched the fan service/ sexy and musclular characters for average/bloated looking ones. They are so bland and unappealing. No one wants to buy different skins for a 4/10 dude or girl or…… “them”
These characters are insufferable
The characters kinda look like people in costumes. Maybe a little TOO realistic. Some "hero shooters" like Overwatch have a distinct silhouette and striking design (or some primary color you can associate the character with) that lets the opponent know at a glance who they're facing. Other than a few I'm seeing, all these guys just look like, well, people at a glance.
Sure, in the real world, a shooter is just somebody with a gun and you might not know what they're doing until it's too late, but this is a video game and visual shorthand is needed for ease of play.
Silhouettes are important in hero shooters, look at TF2 - at a glance you can tell what character you're shooting at, even if they're wearing 50 million cosmetics
Im not so much concerned with the gameplay implications, but I do agree that the character designs are very boring and lack personality. "People in costumes" is a pretty good summary, they dont look like individual unique characters.. They just look like people.
As someone who doesn’t really play these kinds of games, I will say that OverWatch, League of Legends and even Apex Legends to an extent have good character designs. At worse, there’s the ODD character who looks generic.
Here… everyone does
Specifically for hero shooters, you need to get some inkling of the person you're fighting at a glance. Like COD, who cares, every operator has access to everything in that game before you head into a match. But every kit for a hero shooter character is different. If the sniper looks the same as the close-quarters brawler, it's just a recipe for confusion.
Character design is a joke, i don't even wanna look at those character, let alone play as them.
What's wrong with them?
@@redninja3056 Generic cookie cutter personality. Doesn't matter how appealing the designs if each character feels like generic John Fallout.
@kekeke7374 💯 I really like the gameplay and graphics, but those characters designs are really taking me out
That pink girl with uzi is the most disgusting and terrible design i have ever seen.
@@GleppaPigg yeah that's not a good reason try again
My pronums are not/buyng
my pronouns are Blue/berry
🤣
My pronouns are You're/Lame
@@jordanwhite352Watch it with the ableism!
@@jordanwhite352 my pronums are Who/care.
Soooooo, THIS is why we heard Sonys big bombastic plans of live service games and going “all in” blew up in their face. I think they could see the writing on the wall. In all honesty, Sony needs to stick to what they are good at and triple down on AAA singleplayer games, and let Bungie do their thing since they are proven with Destiny. This is 5 years to late.
The scary thing is that this is one of the 6 out of 12 live service games that Sony thinks is good enough to go ahead, which makes you wonder how dogshit games like that live service TLOU must have been.
@@johnm9893 🤣
characters look so bland. I can't even explain why. They're supposed to be cool and quirky considering amount of detail but they're just not. Feels like budget cosplay
Because they are just there to check boxes. Not because of someone coming up with characters they deemed as cool as possible.
But they have pronouns so that makes them more interesting right?!
The major problem is the lack of any sort of thematic cohesion. None of these characters look like they actually belong together. From the alien pink haired girl to space bun galore. It's all a mess of themes with no unifying style or theme.
Overwatch has this same problem, though there is still some cohesion. some characters are of the same crew. (Talon, Overwatch, Vishkar). Some are individual mercenaries of some caliber. They do recognize one another in some shape or form so it doesn't feel too weird. The characters are built around their combat style and talents. Some of Concord's characters.. if not majority of them just don't have anything that tells you enough about what they excel at.
What does pink haired alien girl tells you when you look at her? How about the Prince-wannabe Mcree? Only the tank characters really scream "I'm a bullet sponge".
All of them look like background character or some mob enemy.
Because they are ugly by design. Like it or not, but humans like beauty no matter what ESG is trying to push.
I just find the roster design too unappealing.
That’s ok it just means you have good taste
Yea same. Blizzard does an amazing job with their roster.
Whats wrong with it?
@@redninja3056 Go get your eyes fixed.
@@redninja3056 personally they all have really bland faces as in they have no distinctive features.
I think their silhouettes and proportions should be pushed more for some characters. The ideas are there, I think they should commit more to them and exaggerate their traits a little more imho.
None of the characters are rule34 material like OW. 100% DOA
You’re not wrong 💀
This is the truth content creators don’t wanna say out loud.
The transition from matchmaking to actually landing in the arena gives you *just* about enough time to take a dump, fulfil your Duolingo lesson for the day, ponder your terrible life choices before realising being sat on the toilet's actually quite relaxing, wipe thoroughly, finish up, grab a beer and jump in!
If this was a free game, I still wouldn't play it.
That's why it's 40 bucks
Its not a bad game. I'm having fun
Same, we do not have psn here
@@Pswayze23some folks like watching paint dry too
@Antek_S ps5
no chance this is ever getting installed on any machine i control
This is the way.
Lies buddy 😂
@@Y3llowBoneCope
I thought about testing it, but I don't want to make PSN account, especially that game is pretty bad...
"machine I control" 😅
I can't get over how stupendously ugly this game is. How did it ever go to release looking like this? Everything about it is aesthetically offensive. There is nothing remotely appealing about this game.
This game will be on life support for 5 months before Sony pulls the plug, never going above 3k players.
When a game is a copy paste from a copy paste...
A Xerox of a Xerox
A bad meme crop of a bad meme crop
@@henri2058 u can’t even make this shit up, thx Sony
that's the gaming industry as a whole right now.
@@semmertFym the industry has always been like that
Minecraft is a copy from an old game, Tetris was a copy from a puzzle, Stardew Valley was a Harvest Moon copy, OW is a copy from TF
There is no type of media that is 'original', either they are derived or inspired in something else
If it were F2P id at least give it a try. But $40 means ill never buy it.
its free now so give it a try
@@EverydayTechSJBis it?
It’s only free to play on the beta for PlayStation plus users
@@EverydayTechSJB I'm on PC bud
@@LordBathtub youl be able to log in next weekend for open beta
If the main cast of characters struggle to identify themselves; how the hell is the game ever going to have it's own identity?
It won’t atp
The ROBOT has he/him pronouns 💀
lmao
That is why I won't play it. I don't care how crazy a character is.
That’s how you know priorities were misplaced
TCP/IP
@@strider3438UDP
“If you look past the blueberry” YOOOOOO 💀💀💀
I'm surprised he also didn't say: "And the grapes to the left"
Blueberry is a Destiny term for a random player you matched with, and the game looks like the crucible from destiny, made by former bungie devs. So blueberry is accurate here
@@alexs_toy_barnor its bc its a huge person in blue
@@alexs_toy_barnHe deff was throwing shade at the body positivity token character
@@slogZz60 yea that too
I really can't stand how the game is desperate to sell me on its characters with its Joss Whedon wannabe writing.
Most games and media that aren't history based or comedies are just trying to be something Joss Whedon would do.
@@Saint_Wolf_ They want that Disney money
The Joss Whedon/Millenial writing has infected everything and I'm so tired of it.
Joss whedon made one good avengers movie and tbh its mid compared to anything the ruso brothers did. He also ruined justice league. Maybe having whedon writing is why it sucks
@@kingPigify The Russo brothers are not good directors.
5:44 this character's little animation right here made my skin crawl off my body and hide under my desk.
Right? She’s holding a firearm. Shes supposed to fighting to the death. She’s acting like she’s up for a dance competition.
Its so cringe
In Overwatch is just an establishing shot, here she's just basically the meme of "break it down" and the character starts dancing.
@ewanfraser bit of a nitpick, overwatch has many emotes where characters behaviour stupidly and apex has funky inspect animations and emotes too...
Reminds me of Meave on Paladins
The game looks like it epitomizes "Meh".
The “Redfall” of arena shooters.
Just looks boring
This game is $40
Overwatch is free
Tf2 is free
Valorant is free
Upcoming Fragpunk is free
There is no way this game lasts
Fortnite, CS2, The Finals, and Warzone are all free. Left 4 Dead 2 and Payday 2 are 10 bucks, but they are worth it. Online games should be at most $20.
They got away with it with hell divers. Someone at Sony wet themselves when they saw this and bought the studio. The question is what did they see that none of us seem to be?
OW2 is free, but i guess we don't care about people that i've bought the first one.
Those games are free with iverpriced mtx. Helldivers was 40 with the msot respectabke mtx weve ever seen. If this game follows that logic, it would warrant the 40 like helldivers did.
@@lionzcrown1702the mtx price doesn't matter if they're purely cosmetic.
I didn’t even know this game existed and I spend like 12 hours a day online. Can’t wait for it to go FTP in 2 months and then go on life support
This game looks like was made by Kotaku´s journalis for Kotakus's journalist!
Thank you for saving us $40 Luke!
Smart people didn’t need this video to do that lol
2:22 Austin Butler literally had to go through vocal coaching to stop talking like Elvis, it wasnt an act lmao
Title reminds me of Kojima posts after he went to cinema where if he liked movie he writes several paragraphs about it and if he’s not he just says that he watched it
Idk how they expect people to care about these characters when they give them atrocious designs right from the beginning
*tinfoil hat on*
That's the point.
to explain it more simply, didn't earn it is a thing because several large lending companies demand it as part of their loan agreements. Many large companies in entertainment operate for months on losses so they "need" those loans to not go into the red while working on their next project.
Under US tax law, companies can write off losses in their taxes.
and just like that, you have a cobra problem (more literally, perverse incentive). Rather than trying to make a GOOD game that MIGHT be successful on the market, you can make an absolutely terrible game, do a fucking shit job marketing it, ensure you hire the most pathetic (cheap) dev team that hate gamers; utterly ensuring the game will fail...
Now you the game company can just churn out mediocre garbage, subsisting on didn't earn it loans, and tax writ offs... it's literally easier to make shit, ensure it fails, and cash out on your taxes than it is to try to make something good.
@@lunasakara7306 tinfoil? are we really pretending that blackrock and vanguard are a conspiracy theory now?
@@lunasakara7306 that actually make sense *puts tinfoil hat on*
looks like it takes an hour to kill one enemy
Depends on the character you are shooting with and at. Different archetypes.
No it feels good.
Team dependent game. Probably ruined by SBMM..
@@Pswayze23no it doesnt
That's every single multiplayer game out there.
I never seen any games with less appealing characters rosters until now, they even make big hulking robot looks boring
The artstyle too realistic, making everyone looks dull and ugly
When you got zero artistic talent, you do "realistic".
You can go for a realistic artstyle and still be able to make interesting characters (look at the characters from paragon for examlple)
The issue here are the designs themselves. Theres literally nothing that tells you about who the characters are and their personality. The most important thing for characters is the silohuette and here it doesnt tell you anything about them because they all look alike
You know which characters were interesting? Team Fortress 2 characters and their funny back stories. We need more of that.
And The game also has very inclusive and ptsd filled fan base......
(Tick-tock heavy like a brinks truck)
This universe feels like there is no corners on the tables....so any baby could survive alone.
Even if the game is decent the 40 dollar price tag is going to kill it. This isn’t COD, there is no pre established fanbase.
y and also COD has a SP mode into that 70$ prize
It's sad you even have to mention CoD because CoD sucks.
@@christonchev9762 CoD BARELY has a SP mode. And it's also free if you just want to play warzone, which is arguably the biggest mode the game offers.
@@christonchev9762 But also, like the original comment says, CoD has like 2 decades worth of a fan base. So it's established. This game isn't.
You need to make it as easy as possible to on-board people with stuff like this. Making it free to play with reasonable cosmetic transactions is a good way to go. Lose a bit of money short term for more success later
Really wish they just made this game into a Co op shooter
by the intro that's what I thought it was going to be lmao
but less pronouns man, come on you need to know a robots pronoun/sarcasm
When i had first saw the game from the PlayStation showcase i thought it wax gonna a be a very cool single player story mode game not live service
I'm surprised at the lack of emphasis, from big game companies, on co op shooters.
@@wizzenberryevolve, develop, improve. The world is going to leave you in the dust
It's like Guardians of the Galaxy crossed with the Burger King Kids Club and the "quirky" side of reddit, and then ODed on soy
Also, that victory transition/screen is so boring
I see a lot of comments bringing up Helldivers success but not realizing that Helldivers came out as a completely fleshed out and well-made game, and concord looks like a fanfiction of overwatch.
Jesus, dumping almost two mags into someone without killing?
Orisa in overwatch has 1500 effective health when using fortify. Mcree does 70 per damage with a 6 shooter. 70 x 6 is 420, mcree would take 3 mags and fortify negates headshot damage headshots.
@@KidArkx Orisa is arguably the tankiest Character in the whole game. Her whole kit is being a bullet sponge. And McCree is not the hero with the most damage. So this comparison is not really accurate. In this game, even the 220 HP characters eat like 2-3 mags
@@ghkevilhd44 yeah its like claiming Titanfall's ttk is high because you cant 2 tap a titan as a pilot.
Ex bungie devs made this the ttk is probably akin to halo or destiny crucible
@@singmysinno it’s higher than Destiny, coming from a Destiny player
The concept of doing weekly story-driven cut scenes has piqued my interest, but you need actual characters to carry them and not DEI stereotype flashcards.
Also, I bet that Bazz's pom-pom hair has a hitbox, doesn't it?
- soaked in woke
- ugly characters
- boring viscous gameplay
- paid
I think online will die within a couple of months.
if the cancelled "Last of Us Online" was cancelled for this, I'm extremely interested in how much worse it was?...
Why do you think it's 'soaked in woke'? Just because there's a girl with coloured hair you think it's rainbow capitalism?
It is impressive to see a game make OW2 in its current state look decent by comparison.
“I don’t think anyone are going to doubt the art direction…”. Ummmm, I know you’re a busy guy but , you been under a rock?
The art looks good
The game looks bland af
Yeah, he said that and I was just baffled. The art direction, both how the game is literally rendered and also the artistic choices for the aesthetic, looks bland at best and offputting at worst. My eyes aren't bleeding in my sockets, but I do indeed seriously doubt the art direction.
The art looks good it's the actual designs that are the issue
@@singmysin I guess you could argue the environments look ok.
Hard pass. Only hero shooter im remotely interested in, is marvel rivals and thats a little different than the usual overwatch clone.
Marvel Rivals looks more like OW than this does
Not by much, it's working only because it's marvel and the characters are conventionally attractive.
its like a Chinese clone mobile game of what a guardians of the galaxy hero shooter could be
16:32 let me think of a number of different combo of weapon ideas you could give in order to make unique archetypes.
Cassidy change up idea;
trick shots, switch out different ammo types to perform different shot types to become a Utility/ DPS or even shoot to make temp cover.
Windowmaker change up;
Instead of a grappling hook give her the following;
1. Teleporter that allows her to have a point a to point b
2. A rope and hook you have to throw, allowing you to traverse only based on where you climb and make your own sniping points
3. Make a structure below you, making your own sniping nest
4. Super jump
5. Double jump
6. Flight BUT can't snipe while flying
Tracer change up;
1. Shotgun like the scout from TF2
2. Needle gun
3. Daggers
4. Energy cannon like Megaman
Oh wow that wasn't hard to do now was it. That took me like what less than 5 minutes to think of all of these changes? If you can't think of any creative ideas and only steal from existing archetypes then you might just need to quit being a game designer all together.
16:49 TF2 was able to come up with unique combination of heroes with guns. Stop licking the sack of the game and just accept the fact the team behind this game aren't all that creative.
Warden | he/him 🤣 description of Lennox - how have we got to this point
Brain Her/Pes
Evolution is what got us here. The only way to stop this instance of evolution is to terminate all of humanity. Which is… not ideal… so I recommend adapting
@@phillemon7664let's stick to your first suggestion.🎉
@@phillemon7664 Nah... evolution is... look thats a woman / man I can tell just by looking at them.
But now they want to force arbitrary speech onto me, that can and will change in the blink of an eye (depending on how this "person" feels).
Or I risk getting fined up to 10.000€, if it gets passed in Germany. -> This is Devolution
@@phillemon7664 it’s cultural evolution, not biological. Wouldn’t take much to get rid of it - downfall of America, rise of Islam, destruction of extreme leftist ideology, basic education ahead of propaganda in the media/schools
« He talks in cursive » lmao 🤣
I have seen this game 20 times now only with a different shirt on
Characters move like they are in a cinematic E3 presentation.
3 things devs, big and small, need to understand. It's not 2018 anymore, people are tired of hero shooters and people are tired of battle royals.
Marvel rivals prove you wrong cry and seeth
@@redninja3056 Low quality bait lil bro
@@Bizcuitt it's not bait if it's the truth tho
@@redninja3056 lol goofy
And that they need to aim it to the majority PS/XB/PC users when their budget surpasses the 8 digits. Majority male gamers. A game made for the rainbows and pronouns and the Y-chromosome-less is a game that's not made for the striaght male majority.
I'm a very simple person. I see ideology I don't agree with put in the center stage of a game... I'm out. Will not buy this even if it's the best game ever.
I honestly want to understand how is it so important to put pronouns that big next to the class of the character. Like, who the hell cares its pronouns, it's a freaking video game character. But I get that, they put it there to fight the ideologic war on the internet. So, yeah, I'm not spending money to suport this studio.
Especially if it's obvious the person's a guy or girl. Like, come on!
I like how you say who cares about pronouns in a comment shouting about the fact that you can see pronouns on screen. It's not about ideology grow up
@@joedouglas6968 It's clear you didn't understand my comment.
In a video game (especially a shooter), nobody cares if a character it's a "he/him" or a "it/its". Thats why it should not be put literally as a major information in the character selection.
Doing that, is 100% about ideology. They are activists pandering to the woke people. To the progressive people. Virtue signaling. It lireally can't be more obvious with the pronouns right there, bro, come on.
And I, basically, don't agree with that. So, for this reason, I'll not give this game a try.
@@TheMordgan the lead character designer is giga woke. a "woke levels over 9000" type of person.
These character designs... i just can't. There's like three or four that are somewhat "ok" but even then that would just be me picking them because all the other alternatives are WAY worse.
*I never had played a Hero Shooter before*
I liked the game, the graphics are great and i enjoyed the guns and diferent types of gameplay. I don't like all the characters designs, but there are 16 options, i think it's ok to dislike some of them.
And i don't know how to explain but, this game looks like garbage on videos and gameplays, playing it, feels much better.
I tried it last night. It wants to focus on Overwatch style gameplay, where teams group up most of the time (for healing & DPS). But on Arena style maps (not lane maps)... So it doesn't flow well. It'll be DOA imo...
This is false. This is conpketely difrrent from overwatch style.
It has characters that prioritise support, like healing others, focusing on team play & no health regen. Just to name a few. It has A LOT of similarities with Overwatch. It merges Overwatch elements with Arena shooters, and it fails at it...
Meh, Overwatch has gotten boring, curious to see where this game is going.. maybe they'll have a free version with a rotational free character
@@polakuu Well if it flops, I can see SONY adding it to PS Plus
Not gonna lie dawg, i am not sure i d try it out for free, let alone pay 40 bucks for it.
The characters in this game look like they’re from Saints Row and Fortnite. (Not a good thing at all) what happened to having cool looking characters in games?
These devs are like internet explorer, this game should have been released in 2020
not 2020. 2017
i might be wrong, but this looks a game that will fade out quickly into obscurity. Might have some initial attention, but quickly everyone forgetting it exists
haha that TTK is rediculous
I am a freelance designer and I think the art style is great and it has amazing animations with a unique colour scheme that not many games dare to use. Still wouldn't pay to play something like that though.
How can there even be cutscenes for a game where everyone is fighting for no reason?
At least Overwatch sort of separated gameplay from story.
I don't know.. There is not a single character so far that I find interesting in terms of appearance.. is this some intentional art style?
Its checking DEI boxes. Nothing more.
The art style looks really bad, especially for the characters.
This one is a hard pass for me.
lol, you’re joking 💀 there’s no way
The art style is one of the strongest parts of the game in my opinion.
@rellocozy3261 well art is almost entirely subjective. I also don't care for the art design. Graphically it looks fine. I'm not interested in the characters.
Try the beta, it's fun to play
fascinating how there are always like 2-or 3 overwatch clones announced at every conference and no one cares about any of them.
I honestly could not give two shits about these types of games. The trailer was cool, when I thought it was a single player game, or even co-op. But once i realized what it was, my interest went out the window, as it did for all my friends in the group chat that were talking about the reveal.
The gunplay looked good and you can see the ex Bungie involvement but having payload esque modes without lane maps was a stupid idea
lol where’s there a payload game mode in this game? It’s literally capture the flag or king of the hill. No payload at all
Save your money and don't touch that game.
The fact that there is an entry fee to try is the hilarious part.
At least play the game guy
@@Pswayze23 hey @papapudding, bro over here is saying he'll pay the 40 bucks for you to try it
@@Saint_Wolf_ you can try it in the beta
@@14ElmStreet28 "Hello beta testers"
Somebody needs to check Sony's pot. If they think this is good their pot is laced with drain cleaner.
The CGI trailer intrigued because it looked like a GotG and Star Wars mix which are my two favourite franchises of all time and i thought it would be a coop game. Then they showed the gameplay and immediately I lost interest
Gameplay, art style, dialogue and the whole concept of live service hero shooter game is just a big let down from PlayStation
I love the artstyle but hate the character designs and dialogue
Four years it took to make this 😂
@@jesseshaver2262 Some charachters are fine. Too bad its not even a 3rd of them
Gameplay is pretty good. Im having a good amount of fun
@@jesseshaver2262 Agree, the title screen, the graphic design, the UI all look great but the characters aren't doing it for me.
13:45 I think everyone is doubting the art direction...
Yet you have no good reason why..
@@redninja3056why are you so adamant of defending this ugly unappealing soulless gross game
@@ramses-cit’s fun why are u so angry
@@cmemo6508 it's not fun at all I'd rather play Destiny PvP and i haven't touched Destiny in years
@@cmemo6508 You really trying to bait people because they think a game looks ugly? Sad lol
They should have called it Generic.
They did something never done before. They made the characters so unapealing they defeated rule 34
40 dollars, plus over 100 dollars of PSN year sub. Yea, they are up for a success speedrun to EoS.
T H E M E S S A G E
The intro cutscene for each match is cool... But idk why they don't play it WHILE you're waiting in queue for the match.
I remember a conversation about art design that when you have to broad of a concept and a consistent logic you can easily lack identity. Startreak is a great example as it’s alien deign is humans with funny head features, not the most specific but it works well enough. Like marvel this game seems to drawn it inspiration with from a lot of different places without much logic as to why they all exist together.