Ex: Optimizing the Volume of a Box With Fixed Surface Area

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 9 сен 2024

Комментарии • 15

  • @viralgandhi5491
    @viralgandhi5491 4 года назад +20

    Came down here at the comment section to talk about the cute helper James and found no one :( This Professor is indeed underrated!

  • @colewalker2916
    @colewalker2916 3 года назад +8

    YEAHH GET THE KID DOING SOME INTEGRALS!

    • @DrTrefor
      @DrTrefor  3 года назад +3

      Haha put him to work!

  • @jonaslentfer2494
    @jonaslentfer2494 2 года назад +5

    Hey Dr. Trefor,
    Very informative, and a different expierence with calculus than what i was taught in school.
    I love the fact that you are stating the values of H and L in times of roots instead of simplified numbers, which then gives a more satisfying answer to our problem.
    I have always had a problem in understanding how exactly you are using algebra to simplify the expressions for H and L in respect to the square roots.
    Would you care to explain a bit deeper for me, or could you point me in the right direction in terms of videos you've made where I can learn a bit more of the complex algebra?
    Thank you so much for your video series, they are very valuable to me.

  • @slowfern
    @slowfern 9 месяцев назад +1

    Thank you helper james

  • @klausnordmeyer
    @klausnordmeyer Год назад

    I'm not clear about the infinite L endpoint reasoning at 7:16.
    If L goes to infinity, then H goes to zero. Why should infinity times zero be considered zero, rather than indeterminant?
    The "no volume" situation actually occurs well before L equals infinity due to the constraint of 12000 cm**2 of material, with L determined by equating the volume (after removing H) to zero. This would seem to be what actually allows us to determine that the volume would be zero at the right endpoint of L.
    Sorry if I'm nitpicking, these lectures are excellent. Although I do agree with another comment that it would be great to have a series of lectures that gave proofs for the calculus theorems.

  • @johnnolen8338
    @johnnolen8338 11 месяцев назад

    The method of Lagrange multipliers is much more efficient in this case.

  • @user-ky5dy5hl4d
    @user-ky5dy5hl4d 6 месяцев назад

    Actually there was no differentiation but just solving for H by algebra.

  • @user-qs1tp1ll9i
    @user-qs1tp1ll9i Год назад

    Calculus for baby. Nice!

  • @LofuLammui
    @LofuLammui 3 года назад +2

    Can I carry out second derivative test to show that d^2V/dL^2 = -3L/2

    • @DrTrefor
      @DrTrefor  3 года назад +1

      Yup 2nd derivative test works great too.

  • @mnada72
    @mnada72 3 года назад +1

    Would it give the same answer if we differentiate with respect to H instead of L ?

  • @cutestbear3327
    @cutestbear3327 2 года назад +1

    one proud dad, and deservedly so :D

  • @zuko2216
    @zuko2216 Год назад +2

    There's l everywhere 💀