It's a shame he doesn't have a working grasp of history or current reality, though. He provides the laziest of right-wing hot takes that can be debunked with 1-2 minutes on any search engine.
@@swnews4u161 *flash! **_America didn't have Slavery Alone, and certainly not all Africans were slaves until 1850, when the Democrats made it legal to own people._*_ If you studied history books, and census data, you would know this,_
@@robertcherry7190 That's a pretty feckless thing to say, IMO. America would never have been expanded beyond the original 13 Colonies, if they thought like the losers do today. No pioneer spirit to explore, and make a better world.
I've always tried to follow the Golden Rule. But many of low moral standing, simply mistake kindness for weakness and take that view to it's logical conclusion, which is exploitation. And I don't care for being taken advantage of.
That was powerful. I liked how John kept it on a level of self help and did not try to influence the conversation. Totally awesome! Nice to have this like old times rather than what's going on in the media these days.
I grew up in south Texas in the 70's and I will never forget the first time I saw The Dukes of Hazzard I simply couldn't believe it was real it was so good. Now these many decades later I'm watching these videos from an actor from New York and realizing you are still a man worth my attention. Thank you for the fun show in my youth and thank you even more for being a decent honorable human being!
I remember when I was a teenager around 1990 going to a Civil War reenactment in Florida, among the historical displays and encampment was a large display set up with a couple of black gentlemen dressed in Confederate uniforms, flying Confederate flags, with pictures, documents and artifacts of their ancestors who fought for the Confederacy. I remember being very intrigued by their display because you never heard about that in school. I enjoy American history and the way I see slavery used for the war cause a lot like LBJ used the Gulf of Tonkin for Vietnam, or Bush used weapons of mass destruction for Iraq. They fail to point out that most people fighting in the Confederacy didn't own slaves, probably never interacted with that. Truth in History is being over looked. I could type for an hour on this. As for me and my friend (who's black) we agree there's some bad people with an agenda out there pushing fear and hate dividing up a great country. Wish everyone would just turn off the news that's pushing it and just love and help your neighbors.
It was also Lyndon Johnson that's started America down this road of not being able to call something bad, bad. he took any shame away from lifestyles, that brought about poverty, by trying to bring "dignity" to poverty. It was Johnson who gave us this huge welfare Nation, that's bankrolled by average Americans, that's now even outside US borders, thanks to the NeverEnding whoring for votes, of the democratic party, with the Republican copycats now.
W B, that's how I see it too! There are definitely some bad people playing chess today, but God wins every time.....stay tuned to Jesus! I most certainly agree that if people knew their neighbors, our nation would be alot stronger and caring! Thanks for the righteous perspective you've fostered here with actual facts and real clarity to convey what you learned so that others may learn.
Exactly, be cool to your neighbors, and the world becomes a better, happier place. Heck, just yesterday, I was pleasantly surprised to see that my neighbor out front had dug a fire pit for the whole building to enjoy!
I always had the biggest crush on you as a child. Your posters wallpapered my room. I see now that I had very good taste and I think you are an intelligent and excellent person.
@@leekenyon8705 If you judge people by the color of their skin YOU ARE A RACIST. The color of someone's skin has literally nothing to do with who they are as a person outside of how it impacts others' treatment of them.
Black Man here.. As I thought about the question you asked, I could only think of one thing. All history should be shown and taught, good and bad. The Civil war battle was a bad thing for the States. Brother against brother. When statues and monuments are being removed history is lost.
Full Body Joe, what does the black child take away from statues that depict noble and gallant appearing white men that considered that child subhuman. I'm at a loss as to understand how that black child is supposed learn anything positive from that statue, historically of course.
@Bart: The black child learns how different that society was before. If you make the statue disappear, you remove an impetus to understand everything about the South and how it was, and about how much it has changed for the better.
This channel is just as good as watching "The Dukes" I feel that John understands America and knows why our country is great. We have a complicated history and you need to understand our government and how it works. Nice to see someone from Hollywood with a free mind.
I've learned quite a bit from growing up in a small town, but John I gotta say you helped me learn and think about alot. I love watching your videos and sincerely appreciate your love for this country. God bless
Hey Mr. Schneider, grew up on the Duke boys. Great question. I'm sure many are uncomfortable with it. I'm not. I can sympathize with those who might be uncomfortable with the question, but I'm very much not. When I was in college (never graduated because it just wasn't for me) I often tutored my fellow classmates in American Government & History. I explained what really happened (as I'd learned it) and what they WANTED as an answer. Often very different. "States Rights" are dismissed as 'racist' by the liberals of today. "Of course it couldn't possibly have been about that," they say. Well, slavery WAS in fact one of those 'rights' wealthy white plantation owners believe in, so yes, slavery was one of the pivotal issues. You only have to read the declarations of secession & the Confederate Constitution and count how many times 'slavery' was listed. That's undeniable. However, people of today like to say that slavery was the ONLY issue. I take great offense at that. If slavery was the ONLY issue, then why did the 'Corwin Amendment' not bring the Southern states back into the United States? It was a proposed Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would have permanently enshrined slavery in the Constitution. There are many articles on the subject. Begun in January 1861, many northern states were already in the process of ratifying it, so it would certainly have passed. So why didn't the 13th Amendment that never was not satisfy the Confederacy? Now, we can go back to 1828. The Tariff of Abominations. It was really a series of tariffs, not just one. But they worked together to greatly increase the tariffs on imported goods. The more industrial North didn't have as much need for imported goods as the South. Southerners believed that it was an unequal tax against them. South Carolina threatened to secede - in 1828! President Andrew Jackson threatened to raise an army and INVADE! Cooler heads prevailed and reduced the tariffs. Flash forward to 1860. The Morrill Tariff was making its way through Congress. It raised tariffs on imported goods back to Tariff of Abominations levels. Abraham Lincoln was supportive of the measure during his presidential campaign. Lincoln never appeared on ballots in the Deep South. Isn't it at least POSSIBLE that another part of the reason for secession was the feeling in the South that the federal government had abandoned it? That isn't without precedent, either. As the War of 1812 began, many in the NORTHEAST, began to feel as though the wealthy South was gaining an unequal control over the federal government and that the war was being sought and persecuted by and for the advancement of the South alone. There was talk in the NE about secession. The Hartford Convention of 1814 was meant to discuss the option of secession. It was never taken seriously, but was presented as an option and news of the Convention later helped destroy the Federalist Party. There's my truth. At least in part. All of those points are easily researched, although if you look at 5 different articles on the Morrill Tariff you'll get 5 completely different views from those who say it wasn't so bad as the Tariff of Abominations and is only used by 'racists' to give credence to the idea that there were more issues other than slavery. To me, once you abandon logical discussion and delve into name calling, you've already conceded the point to the opposition, but that's just my opinion. But all of what I've said you should at least be able to find something corroborating what I've laid out here in some way or another. So, let the haters (or people accusing me of being a 'hater' despite the fact they know nothing about me) begin. EDIT: Just as an addendum to what's going on today. We (human beings, I mean), are VERY good at forgetting history and repeating it, even when we're trying to remember it. With this latest 'craze' to erase monuments and history, well, I can't imagine a quicker/easier way to get back to the cycle of repeating history, than to PURPOSELY erase it.
Of course, Slavery was not the only reason for the Civil War. However, Slavery was a terrible, horrible thing and so it was indeed a good thing to get rid of it.
@@Robert_A_Keyboards4948 OK I have a simple question we can agree that owning a human being isn't proper. Anyhow question what are you personally doing to fight the slavery that is still going on today? Next point is all that has happened is we just changed who the master is. We are all still slaves
@@Robert_A_Keyboards4948 Your point is important, and in no way at odds with any of this discussion, so it’s a shame that people are libel to pretend that it is. Your words should go without saying, but perhaps they need to be said to make sure nobody has the wrong idea. That slavery is an indefensible horror that humans have perpetrated should not be used as a reason to avoid education, questioning and learning.
you didn't address why the flag came back from obscurity around the 1950s and 1960s....WE KNOW WHY - its a retaliation to the civil rights movement going mainstream and the far right feeling threatened by losing the old ways thinking and treating fellow man. they pushed the flag as a NEW symbol of far right heritage. that's the issue - NOT the history of the war...because this flag was dormant for a long while in the population psyche.... until black people "started getting uppity" again...propaganda is EVERYWHERE. im not paranoid.
Great question. I am a black man living in America. I have studied this subject and have what i think a pretty good understanding. Thank you for posting this question. If people will take your suggestion I think it will be an eye opener for all of us and possible a healing opportunity. God Bless!
I think reading and researching are definitely the answer. If you read the articles of succession, especially by Mississippi, where they state that they are separating because northern states were trying to take away their slaves, the cause of the civil war becomes crystal clear.
@@karstenagler3721 but the fighting class didn't own slaves, they were not going to fight for something they don't have. There are three versions of "why are we fighting" that all come together for the war.
@@richmondvirginia4297 so, you say that Mississippi lied in their official statements? When they separated themselves from the Union over slaves that they were in error?
@@StevenE1972 History does say that slavery and the restrictions placed on expansion were the main cause. The south wasn't about to have two America's. They only wanted one system, theirs. You should go ck out 'Checkmate Lincolnists'. They do a great job on both sides.
John you and the Dukes crew were a wholesome show for this first generation Mexican-American. I just bought a rebel flag for the second time in support of freedom and the General Lee. Holier than thou people need to acknowledge that everyone has been shit in and done some shitting on others.
Challenging and thought-provoking. Intelligent. I took a graduate course on the U.S. Constitution and we considered whether the south had a right to secede. Very eye-opening. When people will make the effort to do as you suggest, and gather information from several reliable sources, the results are well worth the effort! Thank you!
I was watching a show recently and can't remember exactly what station or the name of the show but they were talking about how heavily the South was being taxed/tariffed, at that time, for everything they were producing. Conversely all the Northern factories were being given tax breaks/incentives for what they were manufacturing from those goods they received from the South. So the North was getting things at a discount so to speak, due to the cuts made against the South, and then they were selling those goods, many of them back to the South and able to get even more for them. I guess we could kinda equate that with what we have going on today with our government helping big Pharma and Corporate america against We The People.
I'd never imagined when I was a little boy watching the Dukes of Hazzard, that I'd one day be listening to the philosophical, level headed talks of Bo Duke, aka John Schneider. And as one commenter said, with the wisdom of Uncle Jessie 👍
Thank you. But here is one of my first lines of dialogue as Bo: “I choose this life. Not because I don’t know any better but because I believe it is better. And I’m no going to let anyone pollute the well where I drink!” One Armed Bandits. November 1978!
Hey John I know that you and Tom Wopat had the confederate flag on the roof of the General Lee but I don't think that the term racist describes the show or the actors from the show
Absolutely totally true what you're saying about the blacks fighting for the South I didn't have to look it up in the books of propaganda of today my family lived it! Hey Bo check out the very eloquent letters written by the Cherokee People of the Cherokee nation's very beautiful letters written and sent to President Lincoln a declaration of war and pledging their allegiance to the southern people the southern cause for southern Independence!
A friend of mine posted awhile back that we are entitled to our own opinions but not our own facts...great advice to research and discover the actual facts
@Leo Peridot I hear that. But sometimes the journey is more rewarding than reaching the destination. I like the fact that Schneider kept his opinion to himself on this one and encourages us to research for ourselves.
@Leo Peridot the point of the statement is for people to understand that thinking something doesn't make it fact. I agree that a lot of people twist the facts to their favor and that the actual facts are hard to know. We are lied to so much these days. I just appreciate john Schneider's attitude towards the issue
We must be challenged by history to be able to truly understand it! Thank you, sir, for calling us all to seek the truth for ourselves! We must seek to quit finding meme/tweet/single statement answers for everything! We must learn that most controversy is more than that. We can make bold statements on precise moral questions, but when multiple moral questions need to be combined to make a decision, that is when answers are forced to be more complicated!
I already know the outcome of the research. My history prof back in college earned his PhD with his dissertation in the War Between The States. He used to say that anyone that believed that the desire to secede from the Union was solely upon slavery was a fool, and they had no idea what they were talking about. It is sad how history, which is supposed be simply recorded facts, has become political fodder for fools and they twist the truth to the point it is no longer recognizable. But, as my professor said, "what should we expect when liberal extremists have invaded out schools, colleges, and universities. They spew out lies and hate, rather than fact and truth." That was many years ago, how much worse has it gotten? Look around and see the result of decades of liberalism! I agree, and would add, "Yes, that and the news media, social media, and political realm to the point they are all acting like communists and think they are doing something good."
What percentage of their desire to secede was based around the desire to keep slavery? 99%? 50%? 10%? What would you say? was slavery not an issue during the civil war?
Dude, their political party lost, that’s why the wanted to leave the union. Nothing to with slavery. Lincoln was not even in office before they declared independence. But they knew what the liberal Republican Party and Lincoln had in mind… he was gonna free the… cough… I mean, raise tariffs and trample all over their right to keep any particular institutions they wanted. Anyone who says the war was over slavery is a liberal commie. It was over freedom! Freedom to keep other men in chains if you want to or not. That’s the America they fought the war for.
@@will2003michael2003 I never claimed any percentage, just that it was NOT the only issue going on at that time, that led those states to want to succeed. Sure, slavery was a part of the issue, but again, NOT the main, or only, issue.
@@will2003michael2003 One of the big things that was happening, that the liberals love to try and cover, is the southern states were basically forced to have slaves. I have worked in tobacco, most of my family had farms and grew tobacco, and I know how back breaking it actually is. It is an EXTREMELY labor oriented crop, even today. It takes a LOT of people to harvest the plants and get them hung in the barn, etc. Tobacco growers wanted more money for their crops, which the northern states demanded for next to nothing. The feds controlled the price farmers got paid, and it was not enough to hire laborers to harvest the crops in time at the right time. Had the north been willing to pay more for the tobacco, slavery would have not been needed. Had the south won, The Confederate States Of America would have demanded more money and no longer needed slaves. The same holds true with cotton. I have not worked cotton, but I know people that do. Cotton, now mostly relies on machinery, was also very labor intensive. If you have ever seen real cotton plants, you can imagine how raw it could make your hands after a full day of picking it by hand and trying to bale it. Again, if the north would have paid more for the cotton to hire people....same story, different crop. Either way, slavery would have ended when there was enough paid for the crops to afford to hire labor. There were other issues, but that one always seems to interest people. Merry Christmas.
@@TennRides interesting and thanks for taking the time to write. That theory stands in contrast to much economic theory. To quote Thomas Paine “what we obtain too cheaply we value cheaply” for it is in dearness only that gives everything it’s value”. Given this as true, slavery was the thing that under cut the value of cotton and other labor-intensive products. If cotton was not valuable enough of a product to be sold for a profit then it should not have been produced. Southern land is not so worthless that it cannot be used to grow many other crops. Had they not produced it it’s a value would have gone up or it would have ceased to be used. I’d submit that rather than slavery being a necessity it was a cheap and quickfix to make some landowners very rich and possibly help sustain a failing quickly becoming unprofitable industry. Had “the north” paid more these slaveowners more for their cotton they no doubt would have simply reaped in the profits as they did and a inefficient industry would have been propped up allowed to continue. Granted things like the cotton gin changed a lot, I don’t believe that slavery was ever a necessity. I also tend to disagree that slavery would’ve ended if profits were high enough, why would an owner change a business model that is making them increasingly rich? I think they would’ve just used that to sustain their lifestyles. I guess I tend to be a strong believer in laissez-faire economics.
I'm black and as a 70s kid I loved the show and didn't even know about the Confederate flag. I later learned as I got older. Look I get it whites say that the Confederate flag is part of their heritage and their family fought in the civil war, but here is where I think my white friends miss the point. The Confederate flag for blacks is like the swastika for Jews. We wouldn't dare promote the swastika like we do the Confederate flag because Jewish people suffered tremendously just as blacks did. It's a reminder of the suffering. There is definitely a place for the Confederate flag and I agree it is our history but dark history and the place is museums etc. It should not be flipidly flown by whoever wants to. It's place is in history. Even Robert e Lee didn't want to be buried with that flag and he fought for it. So when a white person wants to say they have a right because it's heritage remember there are Germans that have heritage to the swastika but there is no way in hell they can fly that flag. People would be appalled and scream bloody murder. I don't understand why the same respect isn't given to blacks and the negative connotation the flag brings. Do I think the dukes of Hazzard was racist hell no...I love the show but looking back that flag is a hurtful memory. Imagine a car named the general Hitler with a big swastika on it...I don't think Hollywood would have done the show. But for the 80s dukes of Hazzard gets a pass. Yes it's ok to show the swastika from a histocal standpoint in shows and movies and it's also ok to show the Confederate flag in shows and movies from the historical standpoint but to just have them out everywhere is pure disrespect.
I get it, well stated. I don't quite know how to say this except that I am so sorry for what the black community is going through and has went through for so many years, decades. I wasn't raised that way, I was raised by a single, abused white mom, she always told us to be respectful to Everyone Unless they weren't respectful to us. I probably never went through or never will go through what anyone from the black community has, I hope and pray time will change people's perspective, we are all human, no one should ever be made to feel less of a person because of the color of their skin. Peace be with us. All Gods children.
I agree. With you. But I also want to say this. What is the Confederate a flag? A flag... That's just what it is. Next q is. What does that flag repersent TODAY? You and I both know that answer to that. But! Lets say the representation of the flag wasn't used by neo nazi, Skin Heads and KKK and instead used for unity. I'm sure the flag would be more widely accepted. And who knows? The American flag might be the flag less accepted by people. P.s. As a black person who hung out with neo nazu and skin heads. Many or misinformed and heavily dislike the stereotypes of other cultures. But they are actually cool people.
@@Bears11422 That's a good thought - if the Confederate flag didn't represent hate. Unfortunately no one does that.. They want to claim the confederacy didn't fight over slavery but something else. They claim rye Confederacy was all about civil rights for non white males. The Confederate flag is owned by Kkk and neo nazi trash, so its status as a hate symbol will always remain
midgetydeath you should read my comment. And you can't say wich had it worst. That's a horrible argument based on opinion. I could say jews still had there land and many were able to get there wealth back. Africans slaves had every taken from them and wasn't able to get anything back. But then you could say the same for many Jews. See. This goes no where. He wasn't actually saying anything about the south being evil of sorts. He was speaking on what the flag repersent in his eyes heavily based on his society teachings.
Such a politically correct world only exists in the minds of the deranged and what is considered politically correct can be changed on a dime in the name of new politics being more based upon politics then life and such politics can have a negative impact on the lives of the people and their freedoms and a lack of such freedoms can result in even more fake news and science the government and companies playing a even greater role forcing the people and companies to lie for one reason or another and we already have such lies for funding and money making the science even less reliable or trustworthy then it is already and this is even more common in biology, history and genetics and not including political science that are almost based upon lying thus the old say when their is politics their is lies like that European country attempt to prosecute a historian for accidently falling upon surviving material and evidence that challenged their liberal political parties desired history . such seekers of truth could end up as criminals and prisoners committing a new form of heresy or views based upon real history or science. opinion profoundly at odds with what is generally accepted. The death of truth , history and science that also includes religious and science related history.
I researched this issue a while back and still retain some of the sources from back then. But Black men "supported" the Confederacy (either in direct combat or otherwise laboring) for a variety of reasons. However, the literature indicates that there existed a Black aristocracy of sorts in the South that still did not have the same rights and privileges as Whites. Some owned slaves, themselves. The few thousand free Black men who chose to support the Confederacy did so based on two primary (but not only) motivations: 1. the hope of inching closer towards equality, and 2. the fear that the more comfortable lives they did have would be taken away, and they'd be enslaved. It is worth noting that this dynamic still exists among Black people today, albeit in a less overt manner (as White supremacy, in many ways, is less overt). for example, a multimillionaire football player may have been willing to risk everything to take a stand against police brutality; but interestingly, many other players limited their risk exposure. Black men make up over 60% of the NFL, and their activities generate billions of dollars a year for the NFL, its owners, the various locations they travel to and through, travel industries, apparel industries, etc. Yet they did not collectively throw down their jerseys and walk off the field (the comparison being that they opted to remain begrudgingly supporting a facet of the Confederacy rather than abandoning it). Some sources: Yes, There Were Black Confederates. Here’s Why - www.theroot.com/yes-there-were-black-confederates-here-s-why-1790858546 Black Confederates and Afro-Yankees in Civil War Virginia - books.google.com.af/books?id=366g6T8ADjkC&pg=PA202&lpg=PA202&dq=the+black+pseudo-aristocracy+Ervin+Jordan&source=bl&ots=tZpNq4nDBG&sig=IvcYomq6a7jyntX9B_yCE3oWN3w&hl=en&sa=X&ei=0pu9VPahDMi1ggTkqoT4BQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=the%20black%20pseudo-aristocracy%20Ervin%20Jordan&f=false General Butler in New Orleans - archive.org/details/generalbutlerin01partgoog/mode/2up Been in the Storm So Long: The Aftermath of Slavery (book) Other sources dispute that Black men ever fought for the Confederacy because the Confederacy would not recognize Blacks as soldiers. However, despite its controversial nature, the literature indicates that it's simply an uncomfortable truth.
You are right, the Police should get abolished. Free people don't need concentration camp guards. The 2A gives everyone the right to protect themselves.
I don’t view millionaire athletes who protest alleged police brutality incidents as people taking a difficult stand. They are on the side of the majority of their community in that viewpoint. It’s mostly a feel-good posturing move for publicity. Kaepernick is still a millionaire and got endorsement deals after his protest. It became common to kneel, there was no widespread impact for athletes who kneeled. It may have possibly factored into no other teams signing Kaepernick, but he was certainly well on the downward slope of his career. Also, it wasn’t the position itself that people mostly objected to - it was doing it while on the job and during the anthem. If he had gone to the police headquarters of the accused officer and protested there instead, he would have received a small fraction of the criticism he did - and, the focus could have remained squarely on the issue of police brutality, and not on the anthem. Now athletes who DO NOT agree with the BLM political agenda and are willing to say it - those athletes are brave and risk losing a lot. You KNOW they will be heavily criticized and called every name in the book. Do you hear them much? No, black or white, you don’t, because they are petrified of what will happen to them if they voice their opinion. Also athletes who stand up against vaccine mandates - they are brave as hell for standing up to the political pressure. And, making any comparison of the plight of actual slaves to free people who are in the top 1% of income earners I think is a bit insulting to those who suffered the horrible indignity of slavery.
@@joeterp5615 I disagree, and here's why; Kaep took his position, first, quietly, and with specific purpose that he only revealed when asked. And when he did, he absolutely suffered for it. He remained a millionaire, but he was also blacklisted from football. Remarking on his skill is a non-issue. Worse players were re-signed. He was not only blackballed, but he was publicly attacked (as well as supported). While he did it during the anthem, it wasn't ABOUT the anthem. That said, the name of the anthem is "The Star Spangled Banner" after the U.S. flag. The flag specifically stands for a promise that was not being met. Thus, the protest WAS fitting during the anthem. Moreover, to value standing for a song over protesting the brutalization of human life is telling. And the nature of a protest (silent or otherwise) is to confront people with an uncomfortable, ugly reality. It is not supposed to make people feel good or at ease. Indeed, throughout the history of protest, there have always been others who suggested that the protest was inappropriate. Back during the Civil Rights movement, many White people suggested that Black people should stop protesting and be thankful for the way things are...for everything "America gave them;" after all..."slavery was abolished." The same sentiments are echoed today. But let's pretend he DID protest outside a police station. Given the typical Conservative position that Police should be elevated above all others, and that they can do no wrong, I believe people STILL would not be content with Kaep's protest. The average person can't even make a comment about police on social media without it turning into an argument.
Mrs- patterson, I don't know what you're talking about or why he should go. "In Hollywood" means a Hollywood actor. It doesn't mean he is literally in Hollywood as we speak.
My grandparents had to run from the Soviets with my father and two aunts in tow. I should have an older uncle, he was killed in my grandmother’s arms by a soviet Russian. My grandfather kissed the ground when they arrived in America. We still hold our traditions from our past, the horrific atrocities are remembered so they can’t be repeated. You can understand my hatred for Russia attacking the Ukraine, but I can understand why people fought for the soviets, especially during, and right after World War II. This goes with the south, not everyone was rich, a slave owner, nor a racist. Some just saw a different point of view, they had the right to their views and choices. It has molded our country, looking into this further. God bless
Lindsay Michaels Precisely my aunt tells a story about my grandfather working a third job he never told them about she went to the movies with her friends, and saw him in the ticket booth. They ended up buying the boarding house they were in, turned it into apartments, sold the building and helped our family get a leg up. My brother in law is from Mexico, his parents had a ranch in Aguascalientes, never took a handout, worked for everything they have. Thank you for sharing, we all come from different backgrounds, yet we some how all get labeled and bundled in to two groups. An unreal time.
DesertRat45 you can’t burst my bubble, were you born in 1892? My grandfather was, this was immediately following WWII and was the slaughter of 50 million East Germany and beyond
I love listening to famous people talk about anything & everything. Thank you Mr. John Schneider. “Never Give Up, Never Surrender!” -Galaxy Quest America truly is awe inspiring. Let us hope America will still be awe inspiring for many decades to come
Mr. Schneider you have morphed into a true life Uncle Jessie sharing wisdom and encourage others to think for themselves and not just accept what the media tells us.
There was 250,000 free black men in the south when the war started. They didn't have the same social status as white people but they were free, they WERE NOT SLAVES! But 10% of those black men owned slaves. The largest plantation in Charleston South Carolina when the war started was owned by a FREE black man WHO HIMSELF OWNED 200 slaves. What the confederate flag represented has been rather misinterpreted an misunderstood, its taken on a meaning that it didn't originally have. There were SEVERAL black soldiers fighting for the south armed, the one difference is they confederates (the south) treated there black soldiers better then we did (the north). They almost mutiny (open rebellion against the proper authorities, especially by soldiers or sailors against their officers) General Grant had to threaten to hang a entire regime because they refused to fight next to a black regime. Where in the confederacy there black soldiers got the same food, they fought side by side, they got the same weapons. They didn't have the same problems we had in our north army! The confederate flag that we are all most familiar with was known as the southern cross or Saint Andrews cross was actually a flag of the military it was never a flag of confederate state government. This flag was reserved for the military forces, the army, the navy etc.. again it wasn't a UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FLAG! Therefore it never flying over a slave ship it wasn't a representative of the confederate government. It has been misinterpreted over the 150 years of the Civil War that has gone by. OTHER GROUPS have used it in way it SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN USED! Now it's been conceived as racism an slavery but that flag never stood as a representation for the confederate government or any kind of slave power it's self. Now if the war had gone the other way an we the north had lost it would still be the same sorta thing going on. The hatred against the confederate flags is due to basically ignorance to what they really stood for. Now there is symbols of meaning to the flag let me explain that to you as well. The RED on the flag represents the blood of Christ. The WHITE border represents the protection of God. The BLUE "X" represents the Christian cross of Saint Andrews, the first disciple of Christ Jesus an patron saint of Scotland. The 13 stars represent the 13 southern states of secession. Thus, the message of the Confederate battle flag is "Through the blood of Christ, with the protection of God, We the 13 states, are united in our Christian fight for liberty" The star in the center is the most significant because it represents the state of Maryland an the significant being that when it came time for Maryland to vote President Lincoln had the governor an the Maryland legislature locked up so they couldn't vote. Alot of people today don't realize that Maryland is a southern state. This is a war in American history regardless to what happen its all intertwined in to heritage and history. Our ancestors gave there lifes on BOTH sides for us let there be peace in what they did leave the history alone for our future kids an generations to come. You all just spitting at the mouth over some shit you know nothing about, but you'll call anyone out for being a racist but literally have no facts or any truth to what you are saying. Just what I have found on things. Hope this is accurate enough an gives some insight on things. Thank you for the videos an the time for fans of you.
Why cant you say yay or nay? Its an easily answerable question. Saying you will not say yay or nay means one of two things. Either you are too lazy to do your own search, or you just dont want to bring the truth out into the open. The factual answer to his question by the way is "Yay"!
@@1980bwc No. It’s completely fine to take one’s time in formulating an opinion. We need much more of that. I am so pleasantly surprised when I hear “I don’t know” from people about an issue. Everyone thinks they have to immediately pick a side and then vilify those that disagree. The posturing gets exhausting. Questions about the civil war and race are certainly not as simple as many self-righteous people in this country want people to believe - so I think ‘I don’t know” is actually a good place to start from, as it shows a potentially open mind.
QUOTE OF THE WEEK “Kamala Harris’ ancestor Hamilton Brown owned seven plantations in Jamaica in 1817. He employed more than 200 slaves... Kamala Harris is closer to the lineage of slave planters like Jefferson Davis and John C. Calhoun than she is to the lineage of the 4 million slaves in America on the eve of the Civil War.” -Dinesh D’Souza
@@buzz10850 same difference in that time frame. Only stated the facts. Just showing that blacks owned blacks also. Not just the white man's problem. It was the time. People get over it and move on.
Thanks John. I live in Virginia and was actually taught about the Civil War in school. The good the bad and the ugly. It's still a part of history that helped make the nation. Yes black soldiers did fight for the Confederacy.
What would your point be? The fact that blacks were in the Confederate Army (allowed as part of a desperate and then controversial move in the Confederacy to avoid defeat) doesn't alter the fact that every Confederate soldier fought to take the South out of the United States, and make it part of a separate country dedicated to legal slavery in its borders. Apartheid South Africa had blacks in its security forces, civil service; and obviously had black tribal leadership structures. None of those facts mean that State was not racist in nature. The Vichy French were still considered to have been collaborators with Nazi Germany by History.
im Black male im 62 years old , I love the show in the 70s no problem its nice to see you john you look good for your age , keep going , I love the duke of Hazzard
He's also Clark Kent's dad in Smallville. :) But yeah, dukes of hazard just looked like two goof-offs messing with a doofy sheriff and their pa being exasperated all the time. I think the country's awakening to just how bloody American history is and maybe not sure how to calibrate their reactions. People going after George Washington and Thomas Jefferson statues now too. By the time we're done, we might need a new flag, some statehood for a few territories and DC, all the statues in museums with video stories about them, and trees where the statues used to be. :) And the indoor plumbing we promised to the native americans. And quit poisoning the black people's water supplies. And some people with phds figuring out the harder stuff I don't have the brain for...
Man I'm a white man grew up in the 70s . Never thought one thing racist when I saw that show nothing like that ever occured to me or entered my mind. I just watched it because I liked the car chases and the comedy
Sorry I grew up Dukes of Hazzard fan. Not a racist bone in my body. Never saw show and thought about race. If Dukes of Hazzard is now offensive then I give up on humanity and common sense.
But that's the point: YOU look at the Confederate flag, and you don't see racism. THEY look at it, and they see racism. Which means they symbol is NOT the problem - it's their perspective that's the problem. Same with the swastika; for thousands of years it was a religious symbol of peace. For two decades in the 20th century, it was a good luck symbol for pilots. Then one evil man adopted it as his symbol, and now people look at it and ONLY see hate. The problem is that they REFUSE to allow the meaning of the symbol to change, and they refuse to allow ANYONE to hold a different perspective or viewpoint than theirs.
Wow! Thanks, John. I shared your youtube with my daughter just because I knew she needed to hear actual intelligence coming from someone. She is out in the world and has to work around many people today that refuse to think. Instead, they parrot. It has caused her to begin to see others in a negative way. So, I thought listening to you in this youtube might give her light at the end of that dark tunnel where she only seems to find incoherence from others. It might give her relief that there still are people out there that think for themselves. It might give her refuge from the dark that seems to be spreading out there. It might give her pause to realize there are still others out there that are genuine. It might give her a positive view of others again. At least a little. It is refreshing to hear someone talk honestly. And so I hope that she gains some of that refreshment after listening to you. Thanks, again, John, for being here and doing what you are doing. It is much needed. You are a light in the dark.
My family has been fighting for this country since it's founding. I'm eligible to join The Sons of the Revolution, Sons of the Union and Sons of Confederate Veterans. My great grandfather served in WWI, my grandfather ( and his brothers)served in WWII, I have 2 uncles who served in Korea and 1 uncle and several cousins who served in Vietnam. I was stationed in Germany during the Gulf war. My family is as diverse as our country, we argue politics, we have different viewpoints, but we all love America and are ready to defend her.
The Confederates were fighting to take the South out of the United States . (once the War began) They considered it a hostile foreign power .Your relatives in later and earlier wars served the United States. The Confederates fought to leave her, once the Civil War began. The confederates were separatists in that conflict.
Like you, me and my family have been involved in America's freedom from the beginning. My ancestors came in 1610 and 1618 and every generation has served. From the French and Indian War and all the way to Vietnam, and while I served during what little peace time we've had, we've all been proud to serve and will continue to do so. We served from Desert Storm to Enduring Freedom (my son), this country and our Constitution are worth fighting for and dying for. We will defend this country, this Constitution, against all enemies both foreign and DOMESTIC with our very lives.
Except, they weren't soldiers fighting for the United States. They were fighting to create a new country from the Southern States that joined the Confederacy. That was the Confederacy's War Aim. That new country would have been dedicated to legal slavery in its borders. The North's Army were called "Union Troops" because they were loyal to the United States. . Not all of them were abolitionists, but they fought against Southern Independence from the United States. Black enlistment was controversial in the Confederacy, and only done in the dying days of the War. Those slaves allowed to enlist were promised personal freedom after the War. The Confederacy itself was dedicated to legal slavery in her borders, and any territory she annexed.
The most important point you made is that our citizens need to relearn how to research and form their own opinions. Today we seem to have become a single source society that simply regurgitates lopsided notions.
So John, you say you like challanging questions. Good for you. So here is one for you, "how do they get the caramilk in a caramilk bar"? So there's your question John. Enjoy your day!
General Lee did have slaves that were bequeathed to him. He Nd his wife hated slavery but it was illegal to set them free. Also, had he set them free they would likely be set upon by some evil Democrat and killed as runaways or forced onto another plantation. People weren't allowed to just let slaves go. He fought for the state of Virginia as his motivation and not for the whole of the south.
Back in high school, a very passionate history teacher hit on this. He said, without taking sides but as you did, ask the question why did they fight for the confederacy? His answer was in part’s but made YOU think and find out why for your self. One answer was, not all slave owners mistreated their slaves. This was their way of life and some didn’t know another way. Why would the North take away the only home they had ever known? What would happen to them? None of this was meant to cast sympathy on the south but ask if the south was so bad, why would free or slaved men and women fight against the north willingly? This was heavy shit for an 11th grader to ponder🤔 .
You know that asking why if the South was so bad would free men fight for them is the same as stating that the South wasn't so bad, right? Texas, for example, when it issued its statement that it was joining the Confederacy, went on record stating that Black people are less than White people and that it was God's will that they were slaves.
I think at the time people thought of the States as being more allies to each other more then being one big country. It seems like most people felt more loyalty to their home states then they did to the country as a whole at the time. I figure most of the grunt soldiers probably fought to defend their home from invasion since most didn’t own slaves anyway. So I guess the free blacks could have done the same thing. He did say free blacks didn’t he because not all blacks were slaves even in the south. The question wasn’t why slaves fought for the South it was why free blacks did.
@@JasonLewis42 Exactly, There was actually more to the war between the state’s than just slavery. It would effect everyone no matter if you had slaves or not.
@@johngilley3518 It was about slavery. None of that other shit mattered. It doesn't matter if a southern way of life is destroyed. That way of life didn't deserve to last if it depended on the enslavement of human beings. Fuck all that other nonsense trying to make it about anything other than what it was-enough people in the south felt black people were less than human that they considered them property. They were defending property, and that is a completely abominable idea.
@@ZiddersRooFurry Okay, so I have a question. Think about this, so where will you live now that you’ve decided to give the Native Americans back there land? They were here first, they were included in the less than a man clause. Couldn’t own property, had their way of life taken from them by Christian’s. This society doesn’t deserve to exist at the expense of their lives and freedoms.This was a question about why did Free Blacks willingly Fight for the South but you made it something else. So I ask you again, where will you live when you make it right?
John, a very interesting question and very well put. I can't actually explain why a black person would want to fight for the confederacy. I have read a few books about the US civil war which is a vast and complex subject but full of fascinating history. Even as a non-American living in Europe I know the Civil War is the most significant event in US history which still impacts current day America. I especially like your encouragement for people to read, learn history, become informed and all sorts of subjects. I also agree with your comment to form an opinion, be challenged by other people's views but don't force opinions on others. My friends and I don't agree on everything, yet we don't end up falling out or fighting just because we disagree.
Because Southern plantation owners treated their slaves like on-site employees -- very fairly, and like family, in many cases. The Union states were more harsh and industrial and wanted to usurp upon and exploit the (esp. agricultural) resources of the South, (including their slave population) and Southerners weren't having any of that business.
@@zenpaganwarrior I think you are right there. Even during revolutionary times some slave owners themselves were torn with the ideals of it. I remember reading words of Thomas Jefferson something to the fact and he could only come to the conclusion another generation would have to deal with it. If owners could suddenly be in a position to free them then where would they go and how would they be better off was the thoughts and many proved to be true after the war. Many unfortunate ones may have had it better but many that were owned by men that thought like Jefferson found themselves struggling for where their next meal came from and trying to feed their family. I've also read where slaves stayed or came back and still worked their former farms as tenants after the war which I think answers John's question. It was the only life they knew, it was the type of work they knew and just like today, just because more or easier money jobs are out their some people continue to farm and unless you ever farmed the land I don't really expect anyone to understand that.
Mr. Schneider, I absolutely love the way you break things down. You’re the role model that everyone needs. I’m so tired of all the hate in this world and when I watch your videos, it’s like sitting down with PaPa and soaking in so much of his wisdom. Thank you!
First of all, as a Canadian, I loved Dukes of Hazzard, I saw the flag as a symbol of choice on how one lives and in my own mind General Lee was a stateman of incredible honesty and was a true Southern Gentleman. This brings me back to the time as a teen, when I was able to sit down and have an in depth conversation with a man from the United States and I asked many questions on Why and for what reasons did people chose a side, why was there such a bitterness that still divided families years later, I had questions , questions.... This surprised him that I was so interested to understand why this war started. He stated that no one he knew had ever asked questions , even the uncomfortable ones and had a good basis of reference to base my thoughts and questions in one so young ( I was 18) I gave him quite the grilling , I told him I was a history buff, read from many sources, but to talk to someone whose family faced those times gave me truths that books cannot give. He mentioned some good reading and I came away with a new awareness that History is written by the Victors, and therefore will not always give an accurate voice. I learned I must dig the blood and bones and that is uncomfortable through to awful pain and sorrow that can overwhelm you and there may be answers that one may not want to accept or sometimes, there is no answer only Why? Events are people- flawed though we be, must as you say-- go find the bones. Your channel is amazing.
Great question! Very thought-provoking. I did a research paper in high school that indirectly touced on this subject. In my research not only did I find that black women served as medical aids or nurses in the Battleground triage Champs, but I found another very interesting tidbit of information that history doesn't tell. Mind you it's been 25 years since I've done this research so I'm going off of memory. But contrary to popular history belief, the first black military regiment was not in the Union Army. It was in fact a Confederate regiment. They were formed, if I remember correctly, in the summer of 1861 or 1862 in the early days of aggression. Many black men and women both free and slaves were encouraged to join. Those that were slaves we're promised freedom for their service. When the Union found out about this they scrambled to put together their own black units with very little success. It wasn't until after the war in 1866 that the Union's Buffalo Soldiers were formed.. Coincidentally my American history teacher, who was very anti Confederacy, gave me an F for the research paper, confiscated my notes and took them to the principal who was also very anti Confederacy. 2 Days Later, the books I used in my research mysteriously came up missing from the school library period when I asked about him I was told that the school never had those books. To this day I still wish I had my list of references from that paper. Seeing the atrocities and the dismantling of our history that we are seeing today, I'd rather expose my children to the truth and not the wool that is being pulled over everyone's eyes.
With all do respect , what you are saying is you cannot re- research your discoveries and backup your statements . This then becomes heresay and not admissible in court . I thank you for your heartfelt opinion just wish you had a hard reanforcement for your argument . Good stuff if it can be backed up .
@@ahg1358 I appreciate your inside, and I'm sure that the information can be backed up I just haven't bothered to go and do it. When I was 17 I never would have imagined they would go through and censor things in that manner by removing books. In the same respect, the books were in fact published so they've got to be out there somewhere. Kind of hard to imagine all copies have been destroyed. It may be considered hearsay, but I'm not trying to prove anything in court. Just reiterating things that I remembered finding while doing my research paper. A paper that I was required to write (although it was a topic of interest for me), but I don't have a need to research the information again. I just choose to not accept everything that is force fed to us in school as being factual history when in fact in every society "he who wins the war, writes the books". The point was morso to show that the information being passed on to us and our kids is molded in the way if someone else wants you to believe it. It's only when we Dig Down Deeper when we find the real truth. It's a shame that certain groups in our society these days are tolerant and supportive of hiding history, distorting facts, fear-mongering, race mongering, and separatism all in the name of supposedly trying to bring us back together as a nation. Leave our history alone. Good or bad. Let's improve on the good and learn from the bad. That's the only way to truly unite the country.
@@512.constitutionalist8 if you really dig deep it’s quite obvious that this country is proud of what they have but ASHAMED of how they got it! So they try to hide it or cover it up! I’m sure the same could be said for any “free” nation. Or any country for that matter.
I'm 67 yrs old, and grew up in new Jersey. We were taught the south started the civil war, slavery a major early issue, etc. Over the past 10 years, I've learned alot, especially the southern view. Wow, how amazing the other viewpoint is. They never teach multiple view about anything anymore. There's only one narrative. To answer the question, finally; yes thousands of blacks volunteered for the Confederate army. I had seen a gentleman who was a descendant of one. He had an organization that would hold rallies periodically. That was the start of my learning about the other viewpoint. Judge Andrew Napolitano also disagrees with the mainstream narrative. In many ways, it was "the war of northern aggression ". I'm amazed he was even allowed to state it on Fox. That was years ago, and I would guess it's been scrubbed. You are a very thoughtful man, John, and I really enjoy your work. Keep it up! PS that Daisy Duke sure was hot!!
Nick, take it from a southerner born and bred, you've been duped. Although there were a number of contentious issues, slavery was the primary reason for the American Civil War. All other issues PALE in comparison. In short, if slavery had not existed in America, there would never have been a war. Peace.
I greatly appreciate how you handled this!!!!!! Wow! It is crazy how the truth gets changed just enough or parts of the truth get pushed aside for someone to get their point in the spotlight.
Merry CHRISTMAS JOHN! Your message is one that if felt by many, many Americans. People just don't seem to realize that if you give up any of your freedoms; you'll NEVER get them back. I'm really Happy that I found your channel and have just Sub'd. See you in the next one. Oh, and you already know that Christ is King, and God is our Father. So, be well, stay strong,carry your weapon *and Freedoms, and carry on!
LOL OMG THATS "GENERATIONIST" like racist but towards a generation. DOES not exist of course but That is just how far the Marxist communist will go, Remember you heard it here first!
I have been a student of the Civil War since I was in high school in the early 90's, & while slavery was the final straw, conflict had been building for nearly 30 years between the north and south. Look up what's known at the "Tariff of Abominations", otherwise known as the Tariff of 1828. Congress passed a tariff in 1828 that was designed to protect northern industry because that's where the electoral votes were. The tariff put a 38% tax on Southern goods & 45% tax on southern raw materials. South Carolina was hurt the most & it cost John Quincy Adams re-election & Andrew Jackson ended up winning & passing the Tariff of 1832 to help reduce the tax rates, it was still not enough for South Carolina who threatened to secede & in 1833 a bill was authorized to give Jackson the power to use the military against South Carolina should they secede. Both the Tariff of 1832 and 1828 were declared unconstitutional but the damage had been done, and it was the beginnings of animosity between the north and the south that simmered for the next two decades. I know Louisiana had the highest number of free blacks that enlisted in the Civil War, so yes, there were blacks who fought for the Confederacy. It differed from state to state how they raised their armies and how they were organized.
As a Canadian, I know the basics about Confederacy, but wow those facts you just laid out. I've been trying to educate people but most just wont listen. I was sitting here earlier thinking to myself and wondering if there was any way I could get in contact with Mr. Trump and see if he would give a speech saying exactly what you just said. Someone needs to stop the madness. BLM has found their way into Canada and I'm sick of it. I think you, however, should write those words down again get them to your president and suggest to him about making a speech before the entire country. I'm going to copy and past your words here but I will remove the part, "I have been a student of." Maybe if people start looking into it they will realize it was nothing to do with abolishing slavery.
Bayan1905 Great information! Thanks for the education. I didn’t know all of that! I was told that the Civil War was and wasn’t about slavery all at the same time. That Lincoln primarily wanted to keep the Union together and he would do that with or without Slavery. Slavery was actually something of a side issue. However, in the end Lincoln decided that he could do both: 1. Keep the Union Together and 2. Abolish slavery throughout the USA 🇺🇸. People AREN’T being taught all of this in school and therefore only understand the light glossy veneer and react ignorantly!
Bayan1905 Like you said it differed by state but wasn’t freedom promised to slaves in exchange for military service that is for fighting for the Confederacy??
Thank you for encouraging personal understanding and self teaching. Too many just regurgitate the narrative they’ve been fed. I have done so much research, it completely changed my perspective on the South and the Civil War.
My grandfather was born in 1855 and was a drummer with Braxton Bragg's unit. He wrote down in his memoirs about serving with the confederate army as well as his opinions about slavery and how that had changed his life after the war. I am sorry that I have no links to that memoir, just a handwritten paper copy that we are planning on making that digital for preservation. My grandfather said that he was shocked at seeing FREE black men in the Confederate Army. He was able to talk with a few of them to ask them why they would serve in the Confederate Army. For the first man he talked to, this was the reply he received: "There were few plantations to work on, most had been burned down or trashed by union soldiers. A confederate officer had told him that he would receive freedom and citizenship (my grandfather is relaying a message and was not African American, just a poor boy from Louisiana) as would all of his family". The second black soldier told my grandfather that serving with the Confederacy meant that he had work to do and a place to stay, so he worked as a teamster, or cook or blacksmith. My grandfather (Orelouis Callegion) after the civil war, started a plantation in Morganza, Louisiana. Don't get excited, plantations are just farms. Grandpa after seeing the death and destruction of the soldiers on both sides decided that any black persons could have a job on his farm with a cabin to live in (provided the lumber), a share of the crops at harvest and also to live off of, free medical help (yes, my grandmother). At the end of the civil war, no one wanted to hire blacks or poor white men. Remember carpet baggers? But my grandfather was building a legacy and as he said "A black man's blood is just as red as mine and if God can't see a difference, why should I." I have opinions about the Civil War and everything that goes with it, but as John said, my opinions are my own and "you" should formulate your own. Now I did find 2 links, not associated with the previous and I hope that these 2 sites will assist you with any questions you might have. But in John's question, YES there were many free black men who served with the Confederate Army and for many suprising reasons. Please check out: BlBlack Confederates: Truth and Legend | American Battlefield Trust (battlefields.org)ack ; Civil War Soldiers - Facts, Death Toll & Enlistment - HISTORY
@Leo Peridot The Democratic party started those, the Democratic party didn't want to free the slave, but the Republican's went against them and passed the law to free the slaves. Research for yourself and you'll find out I'm right.
@Leo Peridot What you are saying is not true. Whoever told you this is lying. The Democrats are the ones that was connected to the kKK. The Democrats didn't even want to free the slaves, but thank goodness the Republican party didn't agree with them, so see the Democrats are the one who's racist and do all they can to divide us.
@@donnaallen2207 You are so confused you fool. That was then and this is now:The party who is the most anti - black hard core racist organization today is of course the Republiscum party. Both parties are racist to the core but the Republiscum party takes the white hoods by far. Happy trails.
With most actors putting their opinions forward and condemning the police, John is a breath of fresh air. He's very open minded and sees things the way they actually are. He backs up everything with proof and not opinions. John is one of those guys you could sit all Saturday afternoon and just talk with him. You feel good when he arrives, and you feel even better after talking to him.
There was no proof given? He gave everyone an assignment. I did my research. And it was, historically , counter to the message the blacks served nobelly, faithfully and honorably for the Confederacy. We are entitled to opinions but we can not refute facts.
If anyone is defending the Confederacy and minimizing the intent of why the south fought the war for any other reason than to own slaves...they are NOT asking tough questions they are (as Mr Schneider is) just pushing false "lost cause" Confederate propaganda that's been pushed since they lost the civil war. After the civil war the Confederacy had to attempt to re brand themselves as less evil. After all, they lost. Lost, yes, but even that didn't stop most southerners from finding new and effective ways to spread their hate and racism. They hid in plain sight....and the Confederate flag was a most useful tool in spreading their hate. This fact makes it hard to accept anyone defending the confederate flag. Some might truly believe the flag is anything but racist. These are the ignorant people we should fear most. Those who likely never understand that even if there's a .0005 % that the Confederate has been used as a racist tool (i'm sure that % is way higher)...that it should be discarded. The historical significance of the Confederate flag leans more towards racism then it does towards other claims. for this reason alone it should be discarded. Of course the Confederate flag is used throughout the south in 2020. it goes beyond historical context. Imagine if Disney remade the Song of the South for 2020 and kept in all the racial stereotypes, and blatant racism of it's production year, to say nothing of other films like Gone with the Wind. Context does matter. The attempt to convince people that the Confederate flag represents something completely different today is a total fail. Why? Look at the Swastika. It's funny....I'm pretty sure Mr Schneider would NOT defend the Swastika. Ironic, isn't it? After all....all the people who do support the Swastika in 2020 claim that symbol represents something completely different....white pride, or something like that. Does anyone believe the Swastika represents anything other than hate??? Here is the crux. People Like John Schneider push hate and claim its love. see to problem here??? Mr Schneider asks hard questions just like the Roman Catholic church does about its pedophile priest does, oh wait, I'm sorry....the church blames the victims. Hahahahahahahahah. My mistake. John Schneider is surely not blaming the slaves....surely he's not siding with the Confederate leaders who claimed slaves were better off as slaves than where they came from. I'm sure this southern pride he has for the flag comes from a deep seated love of the south and a hatred for those who fought for the right to own slaves. Most people who defend the Confederate flag find it easy to disregard any negative claim against said flag. Maybe I'm wrong and Mr Schneider is asking the hard questions.......or maybe he's simply a racist apologist spinning his views to maintain and promulgate them.
I have been researching after finding out through genealogy my 2x gr grandfather enlisted in the Confederate army, and his brother enlisted in the Union. I read many articles without feeling a need to keep up with sources. I was doing this to sort it out in my own min. As a resident of West Virginia where the mountainous terrain did not lend itself to the plantation life or need for slaves I was very driven to learn more about why our country was so divided. More than anything, I see how history is twisted and manipulated in today’s society. Made me think, “What if I thought I knew why we fought was wrong.” I learned Abraham Lincoln was a Republican.” What? I read enough to find that Virginia had ,in fact, tried to stop further slave trade in colonial times, but the crown stopped them. If they twisted history then as they do now, I needed to read and study history which I did. Many members of both the Confederate and the Union army had only a vague idea of why they were fighting. States rights were a big issue , as the Northern States were becoming quite busy with overriding the rights of the Southern states. Finally I decided to read “THE Rise and Fall of the Confederate Government” by Jefferson Davis. I found him to be very articulate and he believed as deeply in the cause of State’s rights as Lincoln seemed bent on not dissolving the Union. It was to become more advantageous to verbalize it as a war on slavery, because it is always unpopular to be a bully over an underdog. Chapter X in the book spells it out very nicely, as to why Jefferson Davis felt they were fighting “The War of the Rebellion.” As it is today, there is controversy over everything, and nobody willing to look at the strengths of both sides. Abraham Lincoln was a great Republican fighting for a cause he deeply believed in. Jefferson Davis was not an advocate of slavery as he has been painted, but he deeply believed the Federal government was infringing on the rights of the states. Now I need to look at it from another perspective, as to why Afro Americans would volunteer to fight for the Confederacy. I know they did, but I need to learn why. Thank you, John, for making me think instead of listen to bozos give the news the way they want us to see it.
Thanks for the comment, well written. From what I I have read, it seems they were concerned with states rights, the rights of a state to be a slave state or a free state. They also were clearly not happy about the outcome of the elections and possibly fear the growing power of the abolitionist republicans. Interesting points you have made
I am also reading it was more about state taxes. And how to handle the governing of the New wild West territories. South wanted small government, and that the individual states made the laws and handles all taxes. So No Federal Taxes at all. More of a "Thomas Jefferson" stile of governing. Like how the country all started. The North wanted big government controlling everything, which is what we ended up with today that is destroying everything. ** Thomas Jefferson also helped dissolve the first Central banking system and warned us never to allow it again.! But they snuck back in with IRS and so called "Federal Reserve" that is not federal at all. It's private owned banks. (Not good) Quotation: "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered.... I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.... The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." --Thomas Jefferson Here you go, "The Creature from Jekyll Island" here is a video of the guy that wrote that book, that explains it all, he explains it in this video here... It's absolutely nuts that crooked elitist got away with duping people into letting them create a IRS, and a so called "federal reserve", that has nothing to do with our government at all... It's all owned by private banks.!! It's time we Stop Central banking again.!
@@cawthorne6992 Yes, when I steer clear of the newer authors and delve into reading all I can from what was written around that time, I get a completely different idea of how important state's rights were, taxation unfair at times, lots of bullying. South wanted states' rights because they feared the very thing we are enduring now, Slavery was one of the worst things ever committed, because I believe deeply in equality for everybody including the rich and poor. But, most slave trade was done by the north and with northern ships, so everybody was guilty of this inhumanity. It is like in our country today when the Feds ride herd over the states.
All soldiers in the Confederate Army fought to create an independent country (once the Civil War began) in which slavery would be legal and expand in its borders. Had they won; Southerners in those states would not be citizens of the United States, they would be citizens of a separate pro-slavery country. Davis never got diplomatic recognition from Britain and France partly because of widespread hostility to slavery in their populations. The Confederates always demanded the removal of the Emancipation Proclamation as a condition for an armistice and a negotiated settlement. Black slaves allowed to serve in the Confederate Army (which was a desperate and internally controversial move by the Confederacy near War's end) did so with a master's permission , and the promise of individual freedom after the War's end. At that point, they would be free either way. (The Lincoln Administration having committed to abolition by then) West Virginia was a loyalist area of Virginia during the Civil War. It wasn't part of the Confederacy; although undoubtedly it had pro-Confederates living there. Yes, Lincoln was the first Republican President. He ran in 1860 on a platform of using the Federal government to prevent slavery's Westward expansion. (Something all states that eventually joined the Confederacy opposed) The Republicans were not uniformly opposed to slavery in general. Davis certainly favoured the creation of a separate pro-slavery country , his personal views on the subject are not relevant for that reason.
Yes, even as a Canadian ; I did know Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican President of the United States. (Republican Party as founded in the mid nineteenth century)
True history is not taught anymore. My dad got his PhD in History! Bruce Caton wrote many wonderful books and articles about the Civil War. I'm sure he was a Civil War historian , wasn't he? You're a good man. John, I love that you make us think💜💜
When I was in grade school in the 1970's we did a report on The civil war Southern slave owners of which at least 10,000 were Black and supported the Confederacy. Further more the slave issue while important to the south was less so than there States Rights, Sovereignty and Economic health of which they thought Lincoln was going to eliminate! There are many more reasons and here is another odd question Why did Robert E Lee Free his slaves long before the war ever happened yet he fought for the Virginia on the side of the Confederacy + He and his wife donated their Plantation to the USA and it is now known as the Arlington National Cemetery!
B.WebbBodyWorks and they built the monument in Mrs. Lee’s rose garden to ensure she would never want to live there again. There is something to be said about how he treated the slaves at his home. He (illegally) taught them to read and write, provided excellent medical attention and many built a town around the home and stayed after the freeing of the slaves. Lee was offered the Union Army and was an excellent General he just could bear the thought of fighting against his “beloved Virginia”. State pride meant something back then.
Because my Grandfather was always against slavery and secession. He was loyal to Virginia and turned down Lincolns offer to oversee the Union Army. The tariffs were the root cause of the Civil War not slavery, The left has always sought to use slavery as a political weapon
John, I grew up in East Tennessee, the same little town that Tom Wopat lived in when he was married to Lisa. I loved the Dukes of Hazzard , and it was a true family Christian based show for all people to enjoy. Most people don’t have the correct information about the confederate leaders like Stonewall Jackson, a Sunday school teacher that taught black Christian folks. The most important thing is over 80 percent of the confederacy that had soldiers didn’t even own a slave. It was the government taxing the cotton plantations and trying to control our money like they are doing in today’s world. One last thing to remember is that the African people sold their own into slavery and was involved in the slave trade in New Orleans , and one of the largest plantations in Florida was owned by a black lady.
Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that count darkness as light, and light as darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
Thank you for touching on this matter. Ive been trying to get people to look at the flag as itself rather then what represents it for a different view. This way people can understand the matter form a different prospective. People when they look at a flag they only see what it represents and nothing more. A flag can have more then one use as well as its use can be changed. The confederate flag is part of our history and must be respected for future generations to view and learn. people get offended way to easy thees days. If you don't like something or someone for what they like or do whatever reason that's ok but do not hinder them or others because of it. Just because someone likes a flag dose not mean they support what it stands for/stood for. For example I love the cool look of the Nazi flag but i absolutely hate what they did. If you don't like the confederate flag if your offended by it Thats fine look away dont try to remove it.
True. I believe that in the context of "The Dukes of Hazzard," the Confederate flag was meant to represent, instead of racism, rebellion against authority.
I have read and love history. Great that you are a critical thinker. You have the answer as I do. Slavery was the excuse, money was the reason. High tariffs on Cotton, the Souths Blood. Peace
Right on John! I don't think that The Dukes of Hazzard was/is a racist show. The way the Confederate Flag was used was, in my opinion, to reflect the rebel side of the Duke family. I do understand if the flag is seen as a racist flag in general today, but it surely was never the intention of the show and the values the General Lee as a fictional car stood for. Last but not least, I think it's crucial to question everything in your life and do the proper research in whatever it is you want to understand properly.
I'm 19 and from Ohio and I grew up looking at the confederate flag as a flag that stood for rebelling against something or someone I never grew up thinking it was a sign of hatred or racism and I look at everyone as an equal because that's how they should be treated no matter their skin color or religion
I don't think the rebel flag on the dukes Hazzard car or show was disrespectful it wasn't racist people need get that threw there head the show should have never been took off the air the show was clean and respectful family show the rebel flag is history not racist bring back dukes of Hazzard
First it's not a rebel flag it is the Christian flag of St Anthony. It is also the battle flag of the Confederacy. The actual Confederate States flag was totally different originally it looked too much like the United States flag so they changed it.
This is the way every history instructor should approach, really every major question of history. I had a political science teacher in high school, that when I think back, with all my accumulated knowledge over the years....to this day I can't tell you with any certainty which party she leaned toward in elections.
Inasmuch as I'm a cousin to Thomas Jonathan "Stonewall" Jackson, I took a keen interest in a book written by historian James I. Robertson, Jr. entitled, simply, Stonewall. It was Robertson's contention that the War Between the States was fought over states' rights, and I whole heartedly agree. So it's no surprise that 'free black men' enlisted in the Confederacy; they were defending their home turf. (I cannot recommend more highly the book "Stonewall", incidentally. I lived and breathed what has come to be called the Civil War in reading its 900+ pages. And to think that I'm related to Jackson (through his mom, I believe) isn't what you think. I'm not of an ego about it; rather, humbled. I couldn't shine his shoes.)
The Confederate War Aim was independence from the United States.They failed to get recognition from Britain and France , because neither of those countries wanted to be seen to be backing a country dedicated to legal slavery in its borders and any Western territory it managed to annex. The "States Rights" argument in relation to slavery predates the War itself, as well as the Confederacy's formation as a potential country. Lincoln's position before the War, and in its early stages was that the Federal Government had the power to halt slavery's Westward expansion. He was not an outright abolitionist then in terms of his policy position. He also opposed an offensive war against the South, prior to the attack on Fort Sumpter , and the beginning of Hostilities. Lincoln's position on using the Federal government to halt slavery's Westward expansion was unacceptable to the States that left the Union. In any case, if the South had won the Civil War, many Southerners and some Westerners would not be US citizens. (Assuming the new country, or countries lasted into our day) It's also probable;, that the territory now known as the United states would not be home to a Global Power, if the Confederates had won the Civil War.
@@iaingraham7586 -- The states did not leave the union; they were not allowed to, even though there's nothing in the U.S. Constitution disallowing secession. The War Between the States had nothing to do with slavery, although history books are chock full of lies in that regard. The "States Rights" argument had little or nothing to do with slavery. The North was unfairly taxing the Southern states, crippling the Southern economy, as I recall.
@@marilynguinnane4663 They tried to leave the Union , and seek recognition as an Independent country. (they didn't get it) Lee saw himself as a citizen of Virginia, which is why he turned down Lincoln's offer of Union Command. Virginia had voted to leave the United States by that time. They didn't leave the Union because the Confederates were defeated. Had they won , the South (parts that joined them) would not be part of the United States today.Those places are still in the United States, simply because the Confederacy was defeated.
@@iaingraham7586 --- Yes, okay, the confederate states 'attempted' to leave the union, as was their right !!! To reiterate, there is nothing in the U.S. Constitution that disallows secession. I think that the world might have been better off had the South won. Maybe, for instance, Franklin Roosevelt wouldn't have been elected, and since FDR goaded Japan into attacking the U.S., it's possible that that would never have occurred. This country got too big for its britches. The CIA takes duly elected leaders out, and you know what 'out' means. ETC.
John you are such a good speaker and I can tell you are well educated. Thank you for this video and making us free Americans put our thinking caps on and do our homework. Very well said and I'm glad you are opening eyes...whatever anyone's opinions are. Great conversation!
Good work John! We should all be champions of critical thinking. Question EVERYTHING you hear from everybody. Go research it for yourself. Most people saying something have at least part of the story wrong if not more.
I had a Great Grandfather and a G.G.Grandfather, who was in the Civil War and an uncle who asked Questions to them, they were gonna stay out of the war, until neibors and friends kelped getting attacked by the union solders, True Story , But as you know the winner writes History.
LOVE YA BROTHER!! Keep up the fight because I AM not stopping either!!! As WITHIN so WITHOUT!!! Praise the almighty Lord Amen & Amen !!! ❤️❤️❤️🎵😎☘️🦋🌹🌼🌞♓️
Loved this assignment and my son did a school project on this not so long ago. As a surprise I took him on a trip to the battlegrounds from Illinois to Nashville. Opened my eyes up and learned so much from our trip. Thanks for sharing this with us.
I would suggest reading a biography of General Lee. Clouds of Glory is the name. You’d be surprised to learn of some his thoughts on war and slavery. While I agree war is a rich mans game it’s the common citizen that has to fight it. Yes the civil war was about slavery. It was written into each state’s constitution after succession. However only the rich owned slaves and wanted to fight to keep them. If you think back to the time the war was going on most people never traveled farther than a 50 mile radius of their birthplace. Most were poor farmers trying to make a living. So the north was an invading army to them and they had to defend their homeland. Most all battles were fought on southern soil. Most of the people who fought and died didn’t own a slave. I have a 4th generation grandfather who never owned a slave. He wanted no part in this war. But when Mississippi was invaded he felt he had no choice but to defend his home. There’s more than just one side to every story.
I think we already established that most soldiers did not fight over slavery nor states' rights. But the leadership and rich people did. And over succesion of the Southern states (over slavery).
And the annexation of Mexican territory during the Mexican American war? California, Texas, Arizona, Nevada Mexicans we protecting their homeland and were called banditos and outlaws
Wow John!! Thanks so much for asking this question. First, I ignorantly assumed that all people of color in the South were enslaved. Second, I had no idea some volunteered to fight for the South. Third, I didn't take your word for it, I actually looked it up. Fourth, I'm not ashamed to say that I own a Confederate flag, AND I own a diecast replica of the General Lee which plays the horn tune. I'm a proud Black man living in Texas, blessed to be American and honored to live the life I live. 🙏🏾 #HAHN #DOHC
Randal Ansile they were NOT paid. They had MASTERS. What do you mean “free”. Please explain. So 200k UNITED STATES COLORED TROOPS with 175 regiments PICS AND NONE WITH CONFEDERATE? www.afroamcivilwar.org/about-us/usct-history.html www.battlefields.org/learn/topics/united-states-colored-troops
Mike T I never mentioned pay. So not sure of your outrage there. 2nd, there actually were Blacks in the South that were not slaves. It's unfortunate that education convinced some that blacks could only be saves, and stuck on plantations in the South. That's fake news.
Randal Ansile sure a handful were. But the MAJORITY 90+% were not free and were terrorized by the KKK, killed for their land, etc. I mentioned pay because you had to get paid to be recognized as a soldier. FREE LABOR is a slave
Mike T Fighting to protect your own property and financial interests is not free or slavery. It's self-preservation. There were Blacks in the South who didn't trust that the North would allow freed men of color to keep their lands, businesses. The KKK while a radical group were not all "radical" in action everywhere. I get it's easier to bunch everyone into the same basket. The truth is, just as it is today, not everyone Black is living under the subjective view of being oppressed. Same then, same now.
Randal Ansile what property 😂? Owning another human being!!!?? Call it what it is. “Self-preservation “ is STILL fighting for your right to OWN. Of course there were misinformed Blacks and ONLY A HAND FULL fighting in the South. You can barely find pics while having 175 regiments and over 200k in the North. I get it, only the North had cameras 😂. “Not all KKK were radical”. You’re right they had soup kitchens for Blacks. Only placed stakes burning in 1 of 2 Black homes right 😂.
Another great video ! Thank you Mr. Schneider:) Much love and respect. Dukes was one of the happiest memories of my childhood. So thank you for that too.
History is a story that today’s people tell about the past. It is constantly in flux. That’s why all Americans need to tell our stories to represent all of us. Dukes is a landmark show about family, honor, and common goodness. You and Tom created iconic characters that made southerners more than Beverly Hillbillies or clansmen. As a Texan who grew up watching Dukes, you gave a positive spin to southern identity that many of us still cherish into our middle age. The fact you and Tom are not...ahem...born southerners speaks to your legacy as an actor. Forty years later you still hold a place in the hearts of many. Keep speaking your mind and giving insight into one of the most influential tv shows of all time. I shared the Dukes DVDs with my son. He loved the show. Sorry to tell you that Boss Hogg is his favorite character. RIP Sorrell Booke. But take comfort that the legend of the Duke boys has been passed to the next generation. After all you were just “straightenin’ the curves, never meanin’ no harm.” Keep posting videos and speaking your mind. By the way, why are you not a billionaire by selling “authentic” Bo’s General Lees at Maserati prices? Let us know how much those babies go for.
Boss Hogg might've been the most memorable character from that show but I was in 5th grade when "Dukes of Hazzard" was the #1 show on TV and every blond boy at my school imitated Bo Luke like he was a superhero
RB I loved the show too. Never really realized what the flag meant because I was in kindergarten at the time. That’s how indoctrination works and very few of get the opportunity to break through it in life. I’m glad that I got to examine my own ideas and internal structures and reject thinking like the belief that my kids should be indoctrinated into this cult.
John, you are right on . I always think of Bob Dylan’s song , “ The times they are a changing” . And the point I’m trying to say is that , in that song is ‘ and don’t criticize what you don’t understand ‘ , I abide by this saying . I just wish people would read about our American history, and learn things before making comments that they don’t understand. I’m totally against taking down those monuments, because it represents our history ! Why now are they offending people ? It’s a shame. There is nothing wrong with displaying the confederate flag either. People have to understand ,that is a part of our history, whether you are from the north or south. P.S. I live in Somers,NY just up the road from Good old MT.Kisco 😊
Solid, considerate, and profound as always. Mr. John, I come to you to see what you will say on topics as they occur and you never let me down. I wish I could express myself as genuine and intelligently as you do. My great grandfather fought for the CSA. He is buried in the same church cemetery where we buried my mother, and where I will be buried someday. He was a poor man. A share cropper and walked home from the war. My mom studied our genealogy and I have her documents. She wanted me to understand our heritage. She wanted me to know history. She took me to every old library in TN, digging through microfishe and old dusty hand written ledgers, census records, death certificates. I treasure this education.
My family is also from Tennessee and fought in the Civil War on the Confederate side, but were never slave owners. They could barely afford the clothes on their backs. I hope people learn where they came from, and not try to forget what happened
U should be super proud of your heritage but the fact is the confederacy were traitors who rebelled and wished to over throw the USA . U can’t be loyal to two flags . Slavery or whether ur family were slave owners is neither here nor there. Like I said u should be proud of your heritage remember honor and pass that pride down to your kids and so forth. Still the USA as a whole should never had honored or erected statues of any traitors to the USA. By all means hang the flag in your yard I’m Mexican American from Texas 5 generations the confederate flag doesn’t spur any racist opinion to me but it does represent division and an attempt to topple the greatest country USA. U can speak many languages pray to any God but in this country but I was taught we only pledge salute and honor one flag as a nation. Just my opinion on the subject from my point of view race and slavery aside. We stand under one flag in this country
@@UrbanOutlaw713 you can.. we have the english flag scotish flag welsh flag and our union flag all loyal to all .....,but then our left wing communist party are the smallest group,so no influence plus we don,t believe our left wing media.... ware as in the,, usa people believe the most silly nonsense, the twisted left wing media spout...for example the left wing protesters,that are rioting peacefully .is covered so// ..protesting good peacefully.good rioting omitted. um/..but then when the ,right turns up to stop the rioting the media call them wright wing extremist who are rioting so cover so./,, extremist bad,,,rioting added bad... ,so the media portray their communist friends as protesters ,and the right as extremist ..and thats one brain washing example there are many more ,we no longer listen to our sh// sterring media america though hook line and sinker,,
@@UrbanOutlaw713 Actually, the South believed the Articles of Confederation, not of the CSA, but of the Colonies which FREELY gathered together. They read the Constitution in a way that differed from Abe Lincoln. If they entered freely into an association, they could freely dis-associate. It's only after the Civil War that this concept was made null & void.
Agree with Jennie. I had ancestors that fought and died on both sides of the war. No, southerners were not traitors. They felt their sovereignty was being violated, which was what their ancestors fought and died to achieve from the tyranny of King George. Unfortunately the back seat drivers of today feel like they understand the minds of a new nation whose stories of survival were told by to them by their grandparents. I have read many of those first hand accounts of which Schneider speaks while doing my own research of my ancestors. One of those ancestors was my great great grandfather who arrived in Georgia alone and with nothing just five years before the Civil War started. He was a shoemaker who owned nothing and barely spoke English, but he felt compelled to support his state and defend his new home. He was no traitor. One cannot judge the actions of 1860 society with the eyes of 2020. Also, at the time every aspect of the United States economy and that of much of the world centered around the cotton industry. Those who owned the slaves were not the only ones who kept them in chains. The wealth and prosperity of the north was a direct result of the cotton industry, the booming worldwide garment industry and global trade. Nobody’s hands were clean in that regard. Even if a family had nothing to do with the cotton, garment or trade industries, they directly benefited from the general prosperity and growth of the time, which was a direct result of the nation’s cash cow...the cotton industry. There were indeed many free blacks that willfully enlisted in the Confederate military or fought as militia. Likewise, there were many free black men that enlisted with the Union forces. There were also slaves who ran off to join the Union troops. It wasn’t simply just an issue of slavery. It was much more complicated than that, and the war represented a myriad of issues in the minds of every person at every level of standing, including the slaves. If you think it was all about slavery and that the Confederates were just a bunch of traitors, I challenge you to actually do the research that Schneider is suggesting. You will quickly gain a new perspective. Slavery was surely a big part of the war at its core, but not as simply as you may believe. Educate yourself with the actual accounts of the many viewpoints and then form your conclusions. That is your challenge.
Yes. We should respect the valiant abolitionist and enslave people who paid generation after generation with their lives while providing wealth and comfort to the people who brutalized them. It is all about respect.
I grew up in the 70s and I remember what they taught us in school so when all these liberal started rewriting history I knew better so why researched it back when everyone what is losing their minds and name-calling. Civil War was caused basically because of 12 South considered unfair representation. The South had as much land as the north but the north was more heavily populated and got more Representatives. As a result they were able to appropriating more money for projects having to do with a North and things that would help Northern industry. Which the South considered to be unfair since because of they're booming economy they were paying in more taxes than the people of North. They felt that they were being taken advantage of because the north was using their money for stuffed up there. Basically the war was about whether or not the southern states had the right to dissolve the Union they had freely signed up for to begin with. The South wanted to rule themselves. The truth is less than 1% of the population even owned slaves. Slavery was on its way out but no one wanted to tell them they didn't have the right to do it and it was only through trickery and holding back information that they were able to pass it through Congress and the Senate. There were no representatives from the south or it would have been easily blocked. Which it should have been abolished long before that. However they did Ben the rules to get rid of it. Also it's important to know that Native Americans also own slaves. As did some free black people. In fact the very first slave owner in the United States was a black man. Another black man owed him money and he sued him in court and won him as a slave. This is why I get so tired of the liberal narrative. They claim all white people owned slaves. While it was less than 1% at the very height of slavery which was already starting to wane at the time of the Civil War. And 2/3 are the Americans today are descended from immigrants who immigrated after the Civil War which means the white people in America today were not slave owners only a very few would have been. In fact their relatives were not even in the country when it was going on. The north was extremely desperate and it promised freedom to any black person that would serve in the army. So basically people caught with a North to gain their freedom. While the black people in the South fought in the War because they loved the South. Kind of makes you think about that. There are all kinds of historical pictures with black Confederate Army members. People who were as proud of the South as the people up north were proud of the North. Personally I am glad the slaves were free it should have happened a lot sooner. Idealistically we should never have had slaves. I find it extremely telling that black people today Embrace Islam. And reject Christianity because it is The White Man's religion. The so-called slave owners religion. While the fact of the matter is it is the Muslims who were the slave traders who brought them to America in the first place. And they were a hell of a lot more brutal than the slave owners in America. They brought them to other countries as well such as Cuba Haiti and Jamaica. They also took them to the Middle East. The reasons there are not a lot of black people in the Middle East is because Muslims consider them to be animals and required them to be castrated before they were allowed to come into the country. It's hard to have descendants when you've been castrated. It's also fair to note that these people still own slaves and the descendants of slaves that are mixed with Muslims due to raping of the black women over there. It's also fair to note that it was their own black Countryman that sold into slavery in the first place. And had it not been for the slave Traders they would have been killed outright because that's what their Countryman wanted to do they only spared them because of financial gain. Yeah they want to embrace Africa and their long-lost relatives over there. Who would have killed their ancestors had it not been for the slave Traders. This is what happens when you let liberals teach history and twist everything around to fit a narrative of hate. The bottom line is not a single person in the United States his alive today that was a slave or who owned a Slave. It is also fair to note that the same Democrat Party that was in charge of the South also started the KKK after losing the war to suppress the black people. And they waged a silent hundred year war of Terror against a black people. Keeping them segregated in schools to keep them as uneducated as they could and to keep them in fear so they can control them. It was the Republicans once again in 1965 that voted to give them the right to vote. The Democrats have been fighting them for a long time. And when they found out they were going to lose they started using welfare to enslave them and separate their families. Welfare is a Cancer and may have used it against black people to destroy their family units. They have started rumors and lies claiming the party switch positions. Which is a lie because you can still look it up and nowhere has these wife long Republicans Or democrats ever switched parties in Masse. It doesn't even make sense to say they did what would they possibly have to gain from it? They are suggesting that people who used to be racist stopped being racist and started caring. And people who used to care stopped caring and started being racist. This is so ridiculous but you must remember they had kept black people segregated and uneducated so it was easier to fool people who were uneducated. And they have past the tradition of ignorance down through the generations to continue to vote for the Democrats. Basically selling their votes for welfare which keeps them in poverty. I should also mention that it was the Democrat Party that started the Negro Project which was the original name for Planned Parenthood. They hate black people so much that they wanted to kill them before they were even born to keep their numbers low. That's why after all this time they only make up 13% of the population. The number one cause of death among black people is abortion. The number two cause of death is black-on-black homicide. A black person is twice as likely to be killed by another black person than by someone of another race. While a white person is more times as likely to be killed by a black person then by a member of their own race. Cops kill 10 times as many white people as they do black people. The way the welfare works is it encourages crime. and black people commit a disproportionate amount of the crime. So less than 6% of the black population commence over 40% of the violent crime in America. Everything can be traced back to blame the Democrats who are quick to blame everyone else and try to pretend like they are helping. I have researched all of this because I'm always getting in arguments on social media with liberals who try to act like they know more than anyone else. And knowledge is power and if you are powerful in knowledge they cannot walk on you like they do when you are not. With me I usually get called all kinds of names followed by being reported and blocked but that is what happens when these people lose an argument. And the crazy thing is most of the problems we are having today is caused by and carried out by white people. Who are trying to whitesplaining for black people. Who are more than capable to speak for themselves and don't need these fools causing them problems
@Gee Mo Sorry friend.. it was the Irish that built America. The roads,canals, railroads, mines. They were desperate and they were far more educated than former slaves.
Even in the 70s we were being brainwashed. The Great Depression was caused by Capitalism and Socialism saved us...for example of a huge lie they fed us.
As an Australian, I appreciate you comment. Can someone otherwise tell me how I'm supposed to listen to Shannon Sharpe's opinions on these matter? He seems really wound up.
My great great great mother was married to a Union captain at the beginning of the war he was killed in combat at the end of the war she married a Confederate captain .. she had children by both .. So my family was both Union and Confederate... I honor both in my heritage
John what a riveting question! Those freeman of the south enlisted for the same reason the ones did form the north they were offered liberty and equality
Видеоклипы
Watching John Schneider on you tube is better than what's on TV now
Indeed
Legit he keeps it real doesn’t pander to these jerks
I agree 100%
It's a shame he doesn't have a working grasp of history or current reality, though. He provides the laziest of right-wing hot takes that can be debunked with 1-2 minutes on any search engine.
@@a-nannymouse6742 You must be using a left wing search engine! lmao ...Russian Collusion... "Nuff said.
my father always told me treat everyone how you would want to be treated. that's what I try to do.
...if only we had at the beginning of this country and had abolished slavery right then and there
@@swnews4u161 *flash! **_America didn't have Slavery Alone, and certainly not all Africans were slaves until 1850, when the Democrats made it legal to own people._*_ If you studied history books, and census data, you would know this,_
Just think how differently the US would be if everyone behaved that way since 1619.
@@robertcherry7190 That's a pretty feckless thing to say, IMO. America would never have been expanded beyond the original 13 Colonies, if they thought like the losers do today. No pioneer spirit to explore, and make a better world.
I've always tried to follow the Golden Rule. But many of low moral standing, simply mistake kindness for weakness and take that view to it's logical conclusion, which is exploitation. And I don't care for being taken advantage of.
That was powerful. I liked how John kept it on a level of self help and did not try to influence the conversation. Totally awesome!
Nice to have this like old times rather than what's going on in the media these days.
I grew up in south Texas in the 70's and I will never forget the first time I saw The Dukes of Hazzard I simply couldn't believe it was real it was so good. Now these many decades later I'm watching these videos from an actor from New York and realizing you are still a man worth my attention. Thank you for the fun show in my youth and thank you even more for being a decent honorable human being!
I remember when I was a teenager around 1990 going to a Civil War reenactment in Florida, among the historical displays and encampment was a large display set up with a couple of black gentlemen dressed in Confederate uniforms, flying Confederate flags, with pictures, documents and artifacts of their ancestors who fought for the Confederacy. I remember being very intrigued by their display because you never heard about that in school. I enjoy American history and the way I see slavery used for the war cause a lot like LBJ used the Gulf of Tonkin for Vietnam, or Bush used weapons of mass destruction for Iraq. They fail to point out that most people fighting in the Confederacy didn't own slaves, probably never interacted with that. Truth in History is being over looked. I could type for an hour on this. As for me and my friend (who's black) we agree there's some bad people with an agenda out there pushing fear and hate dividing up a great country. Wish everyone would just turn off the news that's pushing it and just love and help your neighbors.
It was also Lyndon Johnson that's started America down this road of not being able to call something bad, bad. he took any shame away from lifestyles, that brought about poverty, by trying to bring "dignity" to poverty. It was Johnson who gave us this huge welfare Nation, that's bankrolled by average Americans, that's now even outside US borders, thanks to the NeverEnding whoring for votes, of the democratic party, with the Republican copycats now.
W B, that's how I see it too! There are definitely some bad people playing chess today, but God wins every time.....stay tuned to Jesus!
I most certainly agree that if people knew their neighbors, our nation would be alot stronger and caring!
Thanks for the righteous perspective you've fostered here with actual facts and real clarity to convey what you learned so that others may learn.
I agree with you we need to come together as Americans unified together
Wisdom WB
Exactly, be cool to your neighbors, and the world becomes a better, happier place. Heck, just yesterday, I was pleasantly surprised to see that my neighbor out front had dug a fire pit for the whole building to enjoy!
I always had the biggest crush on you as a child. Your posters wallpapered my room. I see now that I had very good taste and I think you are an intelligent and excellent person.
I had a crush on both him and Tom Wopat. 😊
I just couldn't decide which one was cuter. Lol
I like John Schneider, he's a cool dude
This sounds much like the oft dispensed wisdom of Uncle Jesse.
Or Jonathan Kent!
I believe that you cannot judge a person by the color of skin, but by integrity.
Agreed. I find it sad how two faced history actually is.
True. All Confederate traitors lack integrity, honor, and decency.
I believe that you can judge a person by the color of skin or anyway it pleases you.
@@leekenyon8705 If you judge people by the color of their skin YOU ARE A RACIST. The color of someone's skin has literally nothing to do with who they are as a person outside of how it impacts others' treatment of them.
@@ZiddersRooFurry You mean like the left judges whites and hate on them for not being brown , black or yellow.
Black Man here..
As I thought about the question you asked, I could only think of one thing.
All history should be shown and taught, good and bad. The Civil war battle was a bad thing for the States. Brother against brother. When statues and monuments are being removed history is lost.
Full Body Joe, what does the black child take away from statues that depict noble and gallant appearing white men that considered that child subhuman. I'm at a loss as to understand how that black child is supposed learn anything positive from that statue, historically of course.
You are a very WISE man...it's all HISTORY and no amount of destruction can change any of it.
That's exactly right.
@Bart: The black child learns how different that society was before. If you make the statue disappear, you remove an impetus to understand everything about the South and how it was, and about how much it has changed for the better.
You can't change history. You either learn from it or you are bound to repeat it
This channel is just as good as watching "The Dukes" I feel that John understands America and knows why our country is great. We have a complicated history and you need to understand our government and how it works. Nice to see someone from Hollywood with a free mind.
Lot of them got out of dodge!
Lot of them got out of dodge!
Except that Sheriff Rosco P. Coltrain (sp?) does not appear on this channel. :-(
@@dbry4756 Uhhh...probably for the same reason he's not chattin' it up with Uncle Jesse or Boss Hogg. They're all dead, dude.
I've learned quite a bit from growing up in a small town, but John I gotta say you helped me learn and think about alot. I love watching your videos and sincerely appreciate your love for this country. God bless
Hey Mr. Schneider, grew up on the Duke boys. Great question. I'm sure many are uncomfortable with it. I'm not. I can sympathize with those who might be uncomfortable with the question, but I'm very much not.
When I was in college (never graduated because it just wasn't for me) I often tutored my fellow classmates in American Government & History. I explained what really happened (as I'd learned it) and what they WANTED as an answer. Often very different.
"States Rights" are dismissed as 'racist' by the liberals of today. "Of course it couldn't possibly have been about that," they say. Well, slavery WAS in fact one of those 'rights' wealthy white plantation owners believe in, so yes, slavery was one of the pivotal issues. You only have to read the declarations of secession & the Confederate Constitution and count how many times 'slavery' was listed. That's undeniable.
However, people of today like to say that slavery was the ONLY issue. I take great offense at that. If slavery was the ONLY issue, then why did the 'Corwin Amendment' not bring the Southern states back into the United States? It was a proposed Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would have permanently enshrined slavery in the Constitution. There are many articles on the subject. Begun in January 1861, many northern states were already in the process of ratifying it, so it would certainly have passed. So why didn't the 13th Amendment that never was not satisfy the Confederacy?
Now, we can go back to 1828. The Tariff of Abominations. It was really a series of tariffs, not just one. But they worked together to greatly increase the tariffs on imported goods. The more industrial North didn't have as much need for imported goods as the South. Southerners believed that it was an unequal tax against them. South Carolina threatened to secede - in 1828! President Andrew Jackson threatened to raise an army and INVADE! Cooler heads prevailed and reduced the tariffs.
Flash forward to 1860. The Morrill Tariff was making its way through Congress. It raised tariffs on imported goods back to Tariff of Abominations levels. Abraham Lincoln was supportive of the measure during his presidential campaign. Lincoln never appeared on ballots in the Deep South. Isn't it at least POSSIBLE that another part of the reason for secession was the feeling in the South that the federal government had abandoned it?
That isn't without precedent, either. As the War of 1812 began, many in the NORTHEAST, began to feel as though the wealthy South was gaining an unequal control over the federal government and that the war was being sought and persecuted by and for the advancement of the South alone. There was talk in the NE about secession. The Hartford Convention of 1814 was meant to discuss the option of secession. It was never taken seriously, but was presented as an option and news of the Convention later helped destroy the Federalist Party.
There's my truth. At least in part. All of those points are easily researched, although if you look at 5 different articles on the Morrill Tariff you'll get 5 completely different views from those who say it wasn't so bad as the Tariff of Abominations and is only used by 'racists' to give credence to the idea that there were more issues other than slavery. To me, once you abandon logical discussion and delve into name calling, you've already conceded the point to the opposition, but that's just my opinion. But all of what I've said you should at least be able to find something corroborating what I've laid out here in some way or another.
So, let the haters (or people accusing me of being a 'hater' despite the fact they know nothing about me) begin.
EDIT: Just as an addendum to what's going on today. We (human beings, I mean), are VERY good at forgetting history and repeating it, even when we're trying to remember it. With this latest 'craze' to erase monuments and history, well, I can't imagine a quicker/easier way to get back to the cycle of repeating history, than to PURPOSELY erase it.
Well said
Of course, Slavery was not the only reason for the Civil War. However, Slavery was a terrible, horrible thing and so it was indeed a good thing to get rid of it.
@@Robert_A_Keyboards4948 OK I have a simple question we can agree that owning a human being isn't proper. Anyhow question what are you personally doing to fight the slavery that is still going on today? Next point is all that has happened is we just changed who the master is. We are all still slaves
@@Robert_A_Keyboards4948 Your point is important, and in no way at odds with any of this discussion, so it’s a shame that people are libel to pretend that it is. Your words should go without saying, but perhaps they need to be said to make sure nobody has the wrong idea. That slavery is an indefensible horror that humans have perpetrated should not be used as a reason to avoid education, questioning and learning.
you didn't address why the flag came back from obscurity around the 1950s and 1960s....WE KNOW WHY - its a retaliation to the civil rights movement going mainstream and the far right feeling threatened by losing the old ways thinking and treating fellow man. they pushed the flag as a NEW symbol of far right heritage. that's the issue - NOT the history of the war...because this flag was dormant for a long while in the population psyche.... until black people "started getting uppity" again...propaganda is EVERYWHERE. im not paranoid.
Great question. I am a black man living in America. I have studied this subject and have what i think a pretty good understanding. Thank you for posting this question. If people will take your suggestion I think it will be an eye opener for all of us and possible a healing opportunity. God Bless!
I think reading and researching are definitely the answer. If you read the articles of succession, especially by Mississippi, where they state that they are separating because northern states were trying to take away their slaves, the cause of the civil war becomes crystal clear.
@@karstenagler3721 but the fighting class didn't own slaves, they were not going to fight for something they don't have. There are three versions of "why are we fighting" that all come together for the war.
@@StevenE1972 Ooooo, zinger, but neither of those change why the war started.
@@richmondvirginia4297 so, you say that Mississippi lied in their official statements? When they separated themselves from the Union over slaves that they were in error?
@@StevenE1972
History does say that slavery and the restrictions placed on expansion were the main cause. The south wasn't about to have two America's. They only wanted one system, theirs.
You should go ck out 'Checkmate Lincolnists'.
They do a great job on both sides.
John you and the Dukes crew were a wholesome show for this first generation Mexican-American. I just bought a rebel flag for the second time in support of freedom and the General Lee. Holier than thou people need to acknowledge that everyone has been shit in and done some shitting on others.
Challenging and thought-provoking. Intelligent. I took a graduate course on the U.S. Constitution and we considered whether the south had a right to secede. Very eye-opening. When people will make the effort to do as you suggest, and gather information from several reliable sources, the results are well worth the effort! Thank you!
They most definitely had the right.
I was watching a show recently and can't remember exactly what station or the name of the show but they were talking about how heavily the South was being taxed/tariffed, at that time, for everything they were producing. Conversely all the Northern factories were being given tax breaks/incentives for what they were manufacturing from those goods they received from the South. So the North was getting things at a discount so to speak, due to the cuts made against the South, and then they were selling those goods, many of them back to the South and able to get even more for them. I guess we could kinda equate that with what we have going on today with our government helping big Pharma and Corporate america against We The People.
I'd never imagined when I was a little boy watching the Dukes of Hazzard, that I'd one day be listening to the philosophical, level headed talks of Bo Duke, aka John Schneider. And as one commenter said, with the wisdom of Uncle Jessie 👍
Thank you. But here is one of my first lines of dialogue as Bo: “I choose this life. Not because I don’t know any better but because I believe it is better. And I’m no going to let anyone pollute the well where I drink!” One Armed Bandits. November 1978!
@@JohnSchneiderStudios Amen!
@@JohnSchneiderStudios, that's Bo Duke gold right there, my good sir.
Hey John I know that you and Tom Wopat had the confederate flag on the roof of the General Lee but I don't think that the term racist describes the show or the actors from the show
@BoDuke Thank you from the south🇺🇸❤🇺🇸
Most important statement made. "History has a tendency to be changed".
I would say you can change the future, but not the past history; to do so would be the changing of facts, truths and accuracy (aka: telling a lie).
Exactly my point.
Victors always write the History, Now who won the war? Clue: It wasn't North or South.
@@Tom-hv2eu You might not be able to change history, but it can be distorted, especially when those who have witnessed it first hand die.
Yes. #whitewashed
And this is a Northerner educating us . Go John!!! Thanks for your insight
Absolutely totally true what you're saying about the blacks fighting for the South I didn't have to look it up in the books of propaganda of today my family lived it! Hey Bo check out the very eloquent letters written by the Cherokee People of the Cherokee nation's very beautiful letters written and sent to President Lincoln a declaration of war and pledging their allegiance to the southern people the southern cause for southern Independence!
A friend of mine posted awhile back that we are entitled to our own opinions but not our own facts...great advice to research and discover the actual facts
@Leo Peridot I hear that. But sometimes the journey is more rewarding than reaching the destination. I like the fact that Schneider kept his opinion to himself on this one and encourages us to research for ourselves.
@Leo Peridot the point of the statement is for people to understand that thinking something doesn't make it fact. I agree that a lot of people twist the facts to their favor and that the actual facts are hard to know. We are lied to so much these days. I just appreciate john Schneider's attitude towards the issue
I'm going to borrow that statement! Thanks!
Read the 'Cornerstone Speech'.
I believe that is the phrase most famously attributed to Daniel Patrick Moynihan.
John, you speak with the wisdom of Uncle Jessie.
Here’s an eye opener for you. John is older now than Denver Pyle was when he started playing uncle Jesse.
@@crosisofborg5524 I was wondering about that this morning. Thanks for doing the research.
Thank you for mature reflection...
@@crosisofborg5524 John is older now than what Denver Pyle was when "The Dukes Of Hazzard" was on the air???
That's really surprising
Uncle jesse really did put good values in those Duke Boys lol
We must be challenged by history to be able to truly understand it!
Thank you, sir, for calling us all to seek the truth for ourselves! We must seek to quit finding meme/tweet/single statement answers for everything! We must learn that most controversy is more than that. We can make bold statements on precise moral questions, but when multiple moral questions need to be combined to make a decision, that is when answers are forced to be more complicated!
I already know the outcome of the research. My history prof back in college earned his PhD with his dissertation in the War Between The States. He used to say that anyone that believed that the desire to secede from the Union was solely upon slavery was a fool, and they had no idea what they were talking about. It is sad how history, which is supposed be simply recorded facts, has become political fodder for fools and they twist the truth to the point it is no longer recognizable. But, as my professor said, "what should we expect when liberal extremists have invaded out schools, colleges, and universities. They spew out lies and hate, rather than fact and truth." That was many years ago, how much worse has it gotten? Look around and see the result of decades of liberalism! I agree, and would add, "Yes, that and the news media, social media, and political realm to the point they are all acting like communists and think they are doing something good."
What percentage of their desire to secede was based around the desire to keep slavery? 99%? 50%? 10%? What would you say? was slavery not an issue during the civil war?
Dude, their political party lost, that’s why the wanted to leave the union. Nothing to with slavery. Lincoln was not even in office before they declared independence. But they knew what the liberal Republican Party and Lincoln had in mind… he was gonna free the… cough… I mean, raise tariffs and trample all over their right to keep any particular institutions they wanted. Anyone who says the war was over slavery is a liberal commie. It was over freedom! Freedom to keep other men in chains if you want to or not. That’s the America they fought the war for.
@@will2003michael2003 I never claimed any percentage, just that it was NOT the only issue going on at that time, that led those states to want to succeed. Sure, slavery was a part of the issue, but again, NOT the main, or only, issue.
@@will2003michael2003 One of the big things that was happening, that the liberals love to try and cover, is the southern states were basically forced to have slaves. I have worked in tobacco, most of my family had farms and grew tobacco, and I know how back breaking it actually is. It is an EXTREMELY labor oriented crop, even today. It takes a LOT of people to harvest the plants and get them hung in the barn, etc. Tobacco growers wanted more money for their crops, which the northern states demanded for next to nothing. The feds controlled the price farmers got paid, and it was not enough to hire laborers to harvest the crops in time at the right time. Had the north been willing to pay more for the tobacco, slavery would have not been needed. Had the south won, The Confederate States Of America would have demanded more money and no longer needed slaves. The same holds true with cotton. I have not worked cotton, but I know people that do. Cotton, now mostly relies on machinery, was also very labor intensive. If you have ever seen real cotton plants, you can imagine how raw it could make your hands after a full day of picking it by hand and trying to bale it. Again, if the north would have paid more for the cotton to hire people....same story, different crop. Either way, slavery would have ended when there was enough paid for the crops to afford to hire labor. There were other issues, but that one always seems to interest people. Merry Christmas.
@@TennRides interesting and thanks for taking the time to write. That theory stands in contrast to much economic theory. To quote Thomas Paine “what we obtain too cheaply we value cheaply” for it is in dearness only that gives everything it’s value”. Given this as true, slavery was the thing that under cut the value of cotton and other labor-intensive products. If cotton was not valuable enough of a product to be sold for a profit then it should not have been produced. Southern land is not so worthless that it cannot be used to grow many other crops. Had they not produced it it’s a value would have gone up or it would have ceased to be used. I’d submit that rather than slavery being a necessity it was a cheap and quickfix to make some landowners very rich and possibly help sustain a failing quickly becoming unprofitable industry. Had “the north” paid more these slaveowners more for their cotton they no doubt would have simply reaped in the profits as they did and a inefficient industry would have been propped up allowed to continue. Granted things like the cotton gin changed a lot, I don’t believe that slavery was ever a necessity. I also tend to disagree that slavery would’ve ended if profits were high enough, why would an owner change a business model that is making them increasingly rich? I think they would’ve just used that to sustain their lifestyles. I guess I tend to be a strong believer in laissez-faire economics.
I'm black and as a 70s kid I loved the show and didn't even know about the Confederate flag. I later learned as I got older. Look I get it whites say that the Confederate flag is part of their heritage and their family fought in the civil war, but here is where I think my white friends miss the point. The Confederate flag for blacks is like the swastika for Jews. We wouldn't dare promote the swastika like we do the Confederate flag because Jewish people suffered tremendously just as blacks did. It's a reminder of the suffering. There is definitely a place for the Confederate flag and I agree it is our history but dark history and the place is museums etc. It should not be flipidly flown by whoever wants to. It's place is in history. Even Robert e Lee didn't want to be buried with that flag and he fought for it. So when a white person wants to say they have a right because it's heritage remember there are Germans that have heritage to the swastika but there is no way in hell they can fly that flag. People would be appalled and scream bloody murder. I don't understand why the same respect isn't given to blacks and the negative connotation the flag brings. Do I think the dukes of Hazzard was racist hell no...I love the show but looking back that flag is a hurtful memory. Imagine a car named the general Hitler with a big swastika on it...I don't think Hollywood would have done the show. But for the 80s dukes of Hazzard gets a pass. Yes it's ok to show the swastika from a histocal standpoint in shows and movies and it's also ok to show the Confederate flag in shows and movies from the historical standpoint but to just have them out everywhere is pure disrespect.
I get it, well stated. I don't quite know how to say this except that I am so sorry for what the black community is going through and has went through for so many years, decades. I wasn't raised that way, I was raised by a single, abused white mom, she always told us to be respectful to Everyone Unless they weren't respectful to us. I probably never went through or never will go through what anyone from the black community has, I hope and pray time will change people's perspective, we are all human, no one should ever be made to feel less of a person because of the color of their skin. Peace be with us. All Gods children.
I agree. With you. But I also want to say this. What is the Confederate a flag?
A flag...
That's just what it is. Next q is. What does that flag repersent TODAY?
You and I both know that answer to that. But! Lets say the representation of the flag wasn't used by neo nazi, Skin Heads and KKK and instead used for unity.
I'm sure the flag would be more widely accepted. And who knows? The American flag might be the flag less accepted by people.
P.s. As a black person who hung out with neo nazu and skin heads. Many or misinformed and heavily dislike the stereotypes of other cultures. But they are actually cool people.
@midgetydeath Your inherent argument is flawed.
@@Bears11422 That's a good thought - if the Confederate flag didn't represent hate. Unfortunately no one does that.. They want to claim the confederacy didn't fight over slavery but something else. They claim rye Confederacy was all about civil rights for non white males. The Confederate flag is owned by Kkk and neo nazi trash, so its status as a hate symbol will always remain
midgetydeath you should read my comment.
And you can't say wich had it worst. That's a horrible argument based on opinion. I could say jews still had there land and many were able to get there wealth back. Africans slaves had every taken from them and wasn't able to get anything back.
But then you could say the same for many Jews. See. This goes no where.
He wasn't actually saying anything about the south being evil of sorts. He was speaking on what the flag repersent in his eyes heavily based on his society teachings.
People need to realize life isn't politically correct
@VIII Maus Then you must hate Camella Harris because her family were slaves owners! Check it out! 🇺🇲
But if you're not, how do you stay employed?
Such a politically correct world only exists in the minds of the deranged and what is considered politically correct can be changed on a dime in the name of new politics being more based upon politics then life and such politics can have a negative impact on the lives of the people and their freedoms and a lack of such freedoms can result in even more fake news and science the government and companies playing a even greater role forcing the people and companies to lie for one reason or another and we already have such lies for funding and money making the science even less reliable or trustworthy then it is already and this is even more common in biology, history and genetics and not including political science that are almost based upon lying thus the old say when their is politics their is lies like that European country attempt to prosecute a historian for accidently falling upon surviving material and evidence that challenged their liberal political parties desired history . such seekers of truth could end up as criminals and prisoners committing a new form of heresy or views based upon real history or science. opinion profoundly at odds with what is generally accepted. The death of truth , history and science that also includes religious and science related history.
especially in the south.
( my opinion )
@@SeansModelBuilds - yeah i understand..its a bunch of ol bullshit.
I researched this issue a while back and still retain some of the sources from back then. But Black men "supported" the Confederacy (either in direct combat or otherwise laboring) for a variety of reasons. However, the literature indicates that there existed a Black aristocracy of sorts in the South that still did not have the same rights and privileges as Whites. Some owned slaves, themselves. The few thousand free Black men who chose to support the Confederacy did so based on two primary (but not only) motivations: 1. the hope of inching closer towards equality, and 2. the fear that the more comfortable lives they did have would be taken away, and they'd be enslaved.
It is worth noting that this dynamic still exists among Black people today, albeit in a less overt manner (as White supremacy, in many ways, is less overt). for example, a multimillionaire football player may have been willing to risk everything to take a stand against police brutality; but interestingly, many other players limited their risk exposure. Black men make up over 60% of the NFL, and their activities generate billions of dollars a year for the NFL, its owners, the various locations they travel to and through, travel industries, apparel industries, etc. Yet they did not collectively throw down their jerseys and walk off the field (the comparison being that they opted to remain begrudgingly supporting a facet of the Confederacy rather than abandoning it).
Some sources:
Yes, There Were Black Confederates. Here’s Why - www.theroot.com/yes-there-were-black-confederates-here-s-why-1790858546
Black Confederates and Afro-Yankees in Civil War Virginia - books.google.com.af/books?id=366g6T8ADjkC&pg=PA202&lpg=PA202&dq=the+black+pseudo-aristocracy+Ervin+Jordan&source=bl&ots=tZpNq4nDBG&sig=IvcYomq6a7jyntX9B_yCE3oWN3w&hl=en&sa=X&ei=0pu9VPahDMi1ggTkqoT4BQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=the%20black%20pseudo-aristocracy%20Ervin%20Jordan&f=false
General Butler in New Orleans - archive.org/details/generalbutlerin01partgoog/mode/2up
Been in the Storm So Long: The Aftermath of Slavery (book)
Other sources dispute that Black men ever fought for the Confederacy because the Confederacy would not recognize Blacks as soldiers. However, despite its controversial nature, the literature indicates that it's simply an uncomfortable truth.
You are right, the Police should get abolished. Free people don't need concentration camp guards. The 2A gives everyone the right to protect themselves.
Yep
I don’t view millionaire athletes who protest alleged police brutality incidents as people taking a difficult stand. They are on the side of the majority of their community in that viewpoint. It’s mostly a feel-good posturing move for publicity. Kaepernick is still a millionaire and got endorsement deals after his protest. It became common to kneel, there was no widespread impact for athletes who kneeled. It may have possibly factored into no other teams signing Kaepernick, but he was certainly well on the downward slope of his career. Also, it wasn’t the position itself that people mostly objected to - it was doing it while on the job and during the anthem. If he had gone to the police headquarters of the accused officer and protested there instead, he would have received a small fraction of the criticism he did - and, the focus could have remained squarely on the issue of police brutality, and not on the anthem. Now athletes who DO NOT agree with the BLM political agenda and are willing to say it - those athletes are brave and risk losing a lot. You KNOW they will be heavily criticized and called every name in the book. Do you hear them much? No, black or white, you don’t, because they are petrified of what will happen to them if they voice their opinion. Also athletes who stand up against vaccine mandates - they are brave as hell for standing up to the political pressure. And, making any comparison of the plight of actual slaves to free people who are in the top 1% of income earners I think is a bit insulting to those who suffered the horrible indignity of slavery.
there is no evidence of free black men ever serving as soldiers in the confederate army, what you see in old photographs is uniformed camp slaves.
@@joeterp5615 I disagree, and here's why; Kaep took his position, first, quietly, and with specific purpose that he only revealed when asked. And when he did, he absolutely suffered for it. He remained a millionaire, but he was also blacklisted from football. Remarking on his skill is a non-issue. Worse players were re-signed. He was not only blackballed, but he was publicly attacked (as well as supported). While he did it during the anthem, it wasn't ABOUT the anthem. That said, the name of the anthem is "The Star Spangled Banner" after the U.S. flag. The flag specifically stands for a promise that was not being met. Thus, the protest WAS fitting during the anthem. Moreover, to value standing for a song over protesting the brutalization of human life is telling. And the nature of a protest (silent or otherwise) is to confront people with an uncomfortable, ugly reality. It is not supposed to make people feel good or at ease. Indeed, throughout the history of protest, there have always been others who suggested that the protest was inappropriate. Back during the Civil Rights movement, many White people suggested that Black people should stop protesting and be thankful for the way things are...for everything "America gave them;" after all..."slavery was abolished." The same sentiments are echoed today. But let's pretend he DID protest outside a police station. Given the typical Conservative position that Police should be elevated above all others, and that they can do no wrong, I believe people STILL would not be content with Kaep's protest. The average person can't even make a comment about police on social media without it turning into an argument.
Excellent, John. Thanks for the conversation. ❤️🇺🇸
You're the most honest guy in Hollywood.
Mrs. Patterson home to where? Louisiana is his home and has been for some time.
Mrs- patterson, I don't know what you're talking about or why he should go.
"In Hollywood" means a Hollywood actor. It doesn't mean he is literally in Hollywood as we speak.
Your right.. He can stay. I admit he annoys me,
Wow for someone who annoys you you sure like watching & commenting on his videos.
@@dollface1160
I am torn
My grandparents had to run from the Soviets with my father and two aunts in tow. I should have an older uncle, he was killed in my grandmother’s arms by a soviet Russian. My grandfather kissed the ground when they arrived in America. We still hold our traditions from our past, the horrific atrocities are remembered so they can’t be repeated. You can understand my hatred for Russia attacking the Ukraine, but I can understand why people fought for the soviets, especially during, and right after World War II. This goes with the south, not everyone was rich, a slave owner, nor a racist. Some just saw a different point of view, they had the right to their views and choices. It has molded our country, looking into this further. God bless
Lindsay Michaels Precisely my aunt tells a story about my grandfather working a third job he never told them about she went to the movies with her friends, and saw him in the ticket booth. They ended up buying the boarding house they were in, turned it into apartments, sold the building and helped our family get a leg up. My brother in law is from Mexico, his parents had a ranch in Aguascalientes, never took a handout, worked for everything they have. Thank you for sharing, we all come from different backgrounds, yet we some how all get labeled and bundled in to two groups. An unreal time.
Would love to hear their story
Seth Miller I am, a literal massacre of 50 million +
DesertRat45 you can’t burst my bubble, were you born in 1892? My grandfather was, this was immediately following WWII and was the slaughter of 50 million East Germany and beyond
@DesertRat45 I think the give away that it wasn't 2014 they are talking about are the words Soviet Russia
I love listening to famous people talk about anything & everything. Thank you Mr. John Schneider.
“Never Give Up, Never Surrender!”
-Galaxy Quest
America truly is awe inspiring. Let us hope America will still be awe inspiring for many decades to come
Mr. Schneider you have morphed into a true life Uncle Jessie sharing wisdom and encourage others to think for themselves and not just accept what the media tells us.
There was 250,000 free black men in the south when the war started. They didn't have the same social status as white people but they were free, they WERE NOT SLAVES! But 10% of those black men owned slaves. The largest plantation in Charleston South Carolina when the war started was owned by a FREE black man WHO HIMSELF OWNED 200 slaves.
What the confederate flag represented has been rather misinterpreted an misunderstood, its taken on a meaning that it didn't originally have. There were SEVERAL black soldiers fighting for the south armed, the one difference is they confederates (the south) treated there black soldiers better then we did (the north). They almost mutiny (open rebellion against the proper authorities, especially by soldiers or sailors against their officers) General Grant had to threaten to hang a entire regime because they refused to fight next to a black regime. Where in the confederacy there black soldiers got the same food, they fought side by side, they got the same weapons. They didn't have the same problems we had in our north army!
The confederate flag that we are all most familiar with was known as the southern cross or Saint Andrews cross was actually a flag of the military it was never a flag of confederate state government. This flag was reserved for the military forces, the army, the navy etc.. again it wasn't a UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FLAG! Therefore it never flying over a slave ship it wasn't a representative of the confederate government. It has been misinterpreted over the 150 years of the Civil War that has gone by. OTHER GROUPS have used it in way it SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN USED! Now it's been conceived as racism an slavery but that flag never stood as a representation for the confederate government or any kind of slave power it's self.
Now if the war had gone the other way an we the north had lost it would still be the same sorta thing going on. The hatred against the confederate flags is due to basically ignorance to what they really stood for.
Now there is symbols of meaning to the flag let me explain that to you as well.
The RED on the flag represents the blood of Christ.
The WHITE border represents the protection of God.
The BLUE "X" represents the Christian cross of Saint Andrews, the first disciple of Christ Jesus an patron saint of Scotland. The 13 stars represent the 13 southern states of secession. Thus, the message of the Confederate battle flag is "Through the blood of Christ, with the protection of God, We the 13 states, are united in our Christian fight for liberty"
The star in the center is the most significant because it represents the state of Maryland an the significant being that when it came time for Maryland to vote President Lincoln had the governor an the Maryland legislature locked up so they couldn't vote. Alot of people today don't realize that Maryland is a southern state.
This is a war in American history regardless to what happen its all intertwined in to heritage and history. Our ancestors gave there lifes on BOTH sides for us let there be peace in what they did leave the history alone for our future kids an generations to come. You all just spitting at the mouth over some shit you know nothing about, but you'll call anyone out for being a racist but literally have no facts or any truth to what you are saying.
Just what I have found on things. Hope this is accurate enough an gives some insight on things.
Thank you for the videos an the time for fans of you.
There were no black confederates.
@@ole-mariusbergesen7818 Oh really? www.encyclopediavirginia.org/black_confederates
Thanks this is good information.
Thank you for this history lesson. The left needs to go back to school and learn a little history themselves.
@David Tucker There were 2 territories, that were not yet given statehood, that is the other 2 stars.
I'm not saying yay or nay ... I just wanted to say thank you for asking calmly and explaining this perspective .. Seriously extremely nice ..
Why cant you say yay or nay? Its an easily answerable question. Saying you will not say yay or nay means one of two things. Either you are too lazy to do your own search, or you just dont want to bring the truth out into the open. The factual answer to his question by the way is "Yay"!
@@1980bwc No. It’s completely fine to take one’s time in formulating an opinion. We need much more of that. I am so pleasantly surprised when I hear “I don’t know” from people about an issue. Everyone thinks they have to immediately pick a side and then vilify those that disagree. The posturing gets exhausting. Questions about the civil war and race are certainly not as simple as many self-righteous people in this country want people to believe - so I think ‘I don’t know” is actually a good place to start from, as it shows a potentially open mind.
QUOTE OF THE WEEK
“Kamala Harris’ ancestor Hamilton Brown owned seven plantations in Jamaica in 1817. He employed more than 200 slaves... Kamala Harris is closer to the lineage of slave planters like Jefferson Davis and John C. Calhoun than she is to the lineage of the 4 million slaves in America on the eve of the Civil War.” -Dinesh D’Souza
he owned, not employed them.
@@buzz10850 same difference in that time frame. Only stated the facts. Just showing that blacks owned blacks also. Not just the white man's problem. It was the time. People get over it and move on.
..THE GOOD OLD BOYZ ruclips.net/video/8B58nxWsFi8/видео.html
Thanks John. I live in Virginia and was actually taught about the Civil War in school. The good the bad and the ugly. It's still a part of history that helped make the nation. Yes black soldiers did fight for the Confederacy.
What would your point be? The fact that blacks were in the Confederate Army (allowed as part of a desperate and then controversial move in the Confederacy to avoid defeat) doesn't alter the fact that every Confederate soldier fought to take the South out of the United States, and make it part of a separate country dedicated to legal slavery in its borders. Apartheid South Africa had blacks in its security forces, civil service; and obviously had black tribal leadership structures. None of those facts mean that State was not racist in nature. The Vichy French were still considered to have been collaborators with Nazi Germany by History.
im Black male im 62 years old , I love the show in the 70s no problem its nice to see you john you look good for your age , keep going , I love the duke of Hazzard
He's also Clark Kent's dad in Smallville. :) But yeah, dukes of hazard just looked like two goof-offs messing with a doofy sheriff and their pa being exasperated all the time. I think the country's awakening to just how bloody American history is and maybe not sure how to calibrate their reactions. People going after George Washington and Thomas Jefferson statues now too. By the time we're done, we might need a new flag, some statehood for a few territories and DC, all the statues in museums with video stories about them, and trees where the statues used to be. :) And the indoor plumbing we promised to the native americans. And quit poisoning the black people's water supplies. And some people with phds figuring out the harder stuff I don't have the brain for...
@@superguy6892 dukes of hazzard rules
Man I'm a white man grew up in the 70s . Never thought one thing racist when I saw that show nothing like that ever occured to me or entered my mind. I just watched it because I liked the car chases and the comedy
Sorry I grew up Dukes of Hazzard fan. Not a racist bone in my body. Never saw show and thought about race. If Dukes of Hazzard is now offensive then I give up on humanity and common sense.
This was one of daddy's favorite shows when i was a little girl.I wanted to be Daisy lol
Anybody will do anything to whine and exaggerate.
What isn't offensive these days? PC culture has ruined people's minds
Double ditto!
But that's the point: YOU look at the Confederate flag, and you don't see racism. THEY look at it, and they see racism. Which means they symbol is NOT the problem - it's their perspective that's the problem.
Same with the swastika; for thousands of years it was a religious symbol of peace. For two decades in the 20th century, it was a good luck symbol for pilots. Then one evil man adopted it as his symbol, and now people look at it and ONLY see hate.
The problem is that they REFUSE to allow the meaning of the symbol to change, and they refuse to allow ANYONE to hold a different perspective or viewpoint than theirs.
Wow! Thanks, John. I shared your youtube with my daughter just because I knew she needed to hear actual intelligence coming from someone. She is out in the world and has to work around many people today that refuse to think. Instead, they parrot. It has caused her to begin to see others in a negative way. So, I thought listening to you in this youtube might give her light at the end of that dark tunnel where she only seems to find incoherence from others. It might give her relief that there still are people out there that think for themselves. It might give her refuge from the dark that seems to be spreading out there. It might give her pause to realize there are still others out there that are genuine. It might give her a positive view of others again. At least a little. It is refreshing to hear someone talk honestly. And so I hope that she gains some of that refreshment after listening to you. Thanks, again, John, for being here and doing what you are doing. It is much needed. You are a light in the dark.
My family has been fighting for this country since it's founding. I'm eligible to join The Sons of the Revolution, Sons of the Union and Sons of Confederate Veterans. My great grandfather served in WWI, my grandfather ( and his brothers)served in WWII, I have 2 uncles who served in Korea and 1 uncle and several cousins who served in Vietnam. I was stationed in Germany during the Gulf war. My family is as diverse as our country, we argue politics, we have different viewpoints, but we all love America and are ready to defend her.
Thank you, for your family's defense of our nation, from the beginning, to our somewhat wayward present! May God be good to you, and yours!
The Confederates were fighting to take the South out of the United States . (once the War began) They considered it a hostile foreign power .Your relatives in later and earlier wars served the United States. The Confederates fought to leave her, once the Civil War began. The confederates were separatists in that conflict.
Like you, me and my family have been involved in America's freedom from the beginning. My ancestors came in 1610 and 1618 and every generation has served. From the French and Indian War and all the way to Vietnam, and while I served during what little peace time we've had, we've all been proud to serve and will continue to do so. We served from Desert Storm to Enduring Freedom (my son), this country and our Constitution are worth fighting for and dying for. We will defend this country, this Constitution, against all enemies both foreign and DOMESTIC with our very lives.
As usual, John is showing himself to be a thoughtful, considerate, concise, literate, and wise man.
Hey, you know what....they were just the good ol' boys, never meanin' no harm.
The mountains might get him but the law never will!
Beats all you never saw, been in trouble with the law since the day they were born.
Short Answer to your wonderful question: YES, they did. And deserve all the respect and honor due any soldier who serves this nation.
Except, they weren't soldiers fighting for the United States. They were fighting to create a new country from the Southern States that joined the Confederacy. That was the Confederacy's War Aim. That new country would have been dedicated to legal slavery in its borders. The North's Army were called "Union Troops" because they were loyal to the United States. . Not all of them were abolitionists, but they fought against Southern Independence from the United States. Black enlistment was controversial in the Confederacy, and only done in the dying days of the War. Those slaves allowed to enlist were promised personal freedom after the War. The Confederacy itself was dedicated to legal slavery in her borders, and any territory she annexed.
The most important point you made is that our citizens need to relearn how to research and form their own opinions. Today we seem to have become a single source society that simply regurgitates lopsided notions.
Nice way to say " educate yourself" .intelligence is a good thing to have.
So John, you say you like challanging questions. Good for you. So here is one for you, "how do they get the caramilk in a caramilk bar"? So there's your question John. Enjoy your day!
@@mploi9759 the same way cows get their spots. ;-)
@@davidmcglone409 I paint mine marine enamel and you??
@@mploi9759 I paint mine any color that works to reply to off topic comments.
@@davidmcglone409 awesome! I would like to try glow in the dark paint next time around.
The flag is a battle flag, General Lee was even against slavery
@Roger Clemons you need to do better research
@@ronniewatkins Lee fought more for the pride of his state of Virginia than he did for the beliefs of the Confederacy.
Yes general lee gave a speech before the war denounced slavery and stated it was the greatest scourge to face our nation
@@webman1956 . Lee is often compared to Erwin Rommel for that reason.
General Lee did have slaves that were bequeathed to him. He Nd his wife hated slavery but it was illegal to set them free. Also, had he set them free they would likely be set upon by some evil Democrat and killed as runaways or forced onto another plantation. People weren't allowed to just let slaves go. He fought for the state of Virginia as his motivation and not for the whole of the south.
Back in high school, a very passionate history teacher hit on this. He said, without taking sides but as you did, ask the question why did they fight for the confederacy? His answer was in part’s but made YOU think and find out why for your self.
One answer was, not all slave owners mistreated their slaves. This was their way of life and some didn’t know another way.
Why would the North take away the only home they had ever known?
What would happen to them?
None of this was meant to cast sympathy on the south but ask if the south was so bad, why would free or slaved men and women fight against the north willingly?
This was heavy shit for an 11th grader to ponder🤔 .
You know that asking why if the South was so bad would free men fight for them is the same as stating that the South wasn't so bad, right? Texas, for example, when it issued its statement that it was joining the Confederacy, went on record stating that Black people are less than White people and that it was God's will that they were slaves.
I think at the time people thought of the States as being more allies to each other more then being one big country. It seems like most people felt more loyalty to their home states then they did to the country as a whole at the time. I figure most of the grunt soldiers probably fought to defend their home from invasion since most didn’t own slaves anyway. So I guess the free blacks could have done the same thing. He did say free blacks didn’t he because not all blacks were slaves even in the south. The question wasn’t why slaves fought for the South it was why free blacks did.
@@JasonLewis42 Exactly, There was actually more to the war between the state’s than just slavery. It would effect everyone no matter if you had slaves or not.
@@johngilley3518 It was about slavery. None of that other shit mattered. It doesn't matter if a southern way of life is destroyed. That way of life didn't deserve to last if it depended on the enslavement of human beings. Fuck all that other nonsense trying to make it about anything other than what it was-enough people in the south felt black people were less than human that they considered them property. They were defending property, and that is a completely abominable idea.
@@ZiddersRooFurry Okay, so I have a question. Think about this, so where will you live now that you’ve decided to give the Native Americans back there land? They were here first, they were included in the less than a man clause. Couldn’t own property, had their way of life taken from them by Christian’s. This society doesn’t deserve to exist at the expense of their lives and freedoms.This was a question about why did Free Blacks willingly Fight for the South but you made it something else. So I ask you again, where will you live when you make it right?
John, a very interesting question and very well put. I can't actually explain why a black person would want to fight for the confederacy. I have read a few books about the US civil war which is a vast and complex subject but full of fascinating history. Even as a non-American living in Europe I know the Civil War is the most significant event in US history which still impacts current day America. I especially like your encouragement for people to read, learn history, become informed and all sorts of subjects. I also agree with your comment to form an opinion, be challenged by other people's views but don't force opinions on others. My friends and I don't agree on everything, yet we don't end up falling out or fighting just because we disagree.
Because Southern plantation owners treated their slaves like on-site employees -- very fairly, and like family, in many cases. The Union states were more harsh and industrial and wanted to usurp upon and exploit the (esp. agricultural) resources of the South, (including their slave population) and Southerners weren't having any of that business.
History is grey. Nothing is simply black and white. Non upon intended.. or something
@@CloneShockTrooper 'no pun' I think are the words you were looking for
@@zenpaganwarrior I think you are right there. Even during revolutionary times some slave owners themselves were torn with the ideals of it. I remember reading words of Thomas Jefferson something to the fact and he could only come to the conclusion another generation would have to deal with it. If owners could suddenly be in a position to free them then where would they go and how would they be better off was the thoughts and many proved to be true after the war. Many unfortunate ones may have had it better but many that were owned by men that thought like Jefferson found themselves struggling for where their next meal came from and trying to feed their family. I've also read where slaves stayed or came back and still worked their former farms as tenants after the war which I think answers John's question. It was the only life they knew, it was the type of work they knew and just like today, just because more or easier money jobs are out their some people continue to farm and unless you ever farmed the land I don't really expect anyone to understand that.
Mr. Schneider, I absolutely love the way you break things down. You’re the role model that everyone needs. I’m so tired of all the hate in this world and when I watch your videos, it’s like sitting down with PaPa and soaking in so much of his wisdom. Thank you!
Come together and love and respect one another regardless of "color". Race does not matter in the end!
Those who do not learn from the past are doomed to repeat it
First of all, as a Canadian, I loved Dukes of Hazzard, I saw the flag as a symbol of choice on how one lives and in my own mind General Lee was a stateman of incredible honesty and was a true Southern Gentleman. This brings me back to the time as a teen, when I was able to sit down and have an in depth conversation with a man from the United States and I asked many questions on Why and for what reasons did people chose a side, why was there such a bitterness that still divided families years later, I had questions , questions.... This surprised him that I was so interested to understand why this war started. He stated that no one he knew had ever asked questions , even the uncomfortable ones and had a good basis of reference to base my thoughts and questions in one so young ( I was 18) I gave him quite the grilling , I told him I was a history buff, read from many sources, but to talk to someone whose family faced those times gave me truths that books cannot give. He mentioned some good reading and I came away with a new awareness that History is written by the Victors, and therefore will not always give an accurate voice. I learned I must dig the blood and bones and that is uncomfortable through to awful pain and sorrow that can overwhelm you and there may be answers that one may not want to accept or sometimes, there is no answer only Why? Events are people- flawed though we be, must as you say-- go find the bones. Your channel is amazing.
Great question! Very thought-provoking. I did a research paper in high school that indirectly touced on this subject. In my research not only did I find that black women served as medical aids or nurses in the Battleground triage Champs, but I found another very interesting tidbit of information that history doesn't tell. Mind you it's been 25 years since I've done this research so I'm going off of memory. But contrary to popular history belief, the first black military regiment was not in the Union Army. It was in fact a Confederate regiment. They were formed, if I remember correctly, in the summer of 1861 or 1862 in the early days of aggression. Many black men and women both free and slaves were encouraged to join. Those that were slaves we're promised freedom for their service. When the Union found out about this they scrambled to put together their own black units with very little success. It wasn't until after the war in 1866 that the Union's Buffalo Soldiers were formed.. Coincidentally my American history teacher, who was very anti Confederacy, gave me an F for the research paper, confiscated my notes and took them to the principal who was also very anti Confederacy. 2 Days Later, the books I used in my research mysteriously came up missing from the school library period when I asked about him I was told that the school never had those books. To this day I still wish I had my list of references from that paper. Seeing the atrocities and the dismantling of our history that we are seeing today, I'd rather expose my children to the truth and not the wool that is being pulled over everyone's eyes.
With all do respect , what you are saying is you cannot re- research your discoveries and backup your statements . This then becomes heresay and not admissible in court . I thank you for your heartfelt opinion just wish you had a hard reanforcement for your argument . Good stuff if it can be backed up .
@@ahg1358 I appreciate your inside, and I'm sure that the information can be backed up I just haven't bothered to go and do it. When I was 17 I never would have imagined they would go through and censor things in that manner by removing books. In the same respect, the books were in fact published so they've got to be out there somewhere. Kind of hard to imagine all copies have been destroyed. It may be considered hearsay, but I'm not trying to prove anything in court. Just reiterating things that I remembered finding while doing my research paper. A paper that I was required to write (although it was a topic of interest for me), but I don't have a need to research the information again. I just choose to not accept everything that is force fed to us in school as being factual history when in fact in every society "he who wins the war, writes the books". The point was morso to show that the information being passed on to us and our kids is molded in the way if someone else wants you to believe it. It's only when we Dig Down Deeper when we find the real truth. It's a shame that certain groups in our society these days are tolerant and supportive of hiding history, distorting facts, fear-mongering, race mongering, and separatism all in the name of supposedly trying to bring us back together as a nation. Leave our history alone. Good or bad. Let's improve on the good and learn from the bad. That's the only way to truly unite the country.
@@512.constitutionalist8 if you really dig deep it’s quite obvious that this country is proud of what they have but ASHAMED of how they got it! So they try to hide it or cover it up! I’m sure the same could be said for any “free” nation. Or any country for that matter.
I'm 67 yrs old, and grew up in new Jersey. We were taught the south started the civil war, slavery a major early issue, etc. Over the past 10 years, I've learned alot, especially the southern view. Wow, how amazing the other viewpoint is. They never teach multiple view about anything anymore. There's only one narrative.
To answer the question, finally; yes thousands of blacks volunteered for the Confederate army. I had seen a gentleman who was a descendant of one. He had an organization that would hold rallies periodically.
That was the start of my learning about the other viewpoint. Judge Andrew Napolitano also disagrees with the mainstream narrative.
In many ways, it was "the war of northern aggression ". I'm amazed he was even allowed to state it on Fox. That was years ago, and I would guess it's been scrubbed.
You are a very thoughtful man, John, and I really enjoy your work.
Keep it up!
PS that Daisy Duke sure was hot!!
Napolitano is such a Rino I wouldn't trust a THING he says.
Where in NJ?
Nick, take it from a southerner born and bred, you've been duped. Although there were a number of contentious issues, slavery was the primary reason for the American Civil War. All other issues PALE in comparison. In short, if slavery had not existed in America, there would never have been a war. Peace.
Debra C
yep the north was trying to steal the slaves from the south that’s why there was a war that’s why they are still slaves to democrats
history is written by the victor . because men fear to shine a light on their own misdeeds , they paint their opposition in poor light .
I'm Mexican and from the South.. I agree with everything he says in this video..
I greatly appreciate how you handled this!!!!!! Wow! It is crazy how the truth gets changed just enough or parts of the truth get pushed aside for someone to get their point in the spotlight.
Merry CHRISTMAS JOHN! Your message is one that if felt by many, many Americans. People just don't seem to realize that if you give up any of your freedoms; you'll NEVER get them back. I'm really Happy that I found your channel and have just Sub'd. See you in the next one. Oh, and you already know that Christ is King, and God is our Father. So, be well, stay strong,carry your weapon *and Freedoms, and carry on!
Now John I think you're asking this younger generation to do something they've never had to do read a book of ( history)!!!!!!!!
LOL OMG THATS "GENERATIONIST" like racist but towards a generation. DOES not exist of course but That is just how far the Marxist communist will go, Remember you heard it here first!
I thought they burned all those old-fashioned things.
Yeap and believe in something the media not saying
I have been a student of the Civil War since I was in high school in the early 90's, & while slavery was the final straw, conflict had been building for nearly 30 years between the north and south. Look up what's known at the "Tariff of Abominations", otherwise known as the Tariff of 1828. Congress passed a tariff in 1828 that was designed to protect northern industry because that's where the electoral votes were. The tariff put a 38% tax on Southern goods & 45% tax on southern raw materials. South Carolina was hurt the most & it cost John Quincy Adams re-election & Andrew Jackson ended up winning & passing the Tariff of 1832 to help reduce the tax rates, it was still not enough for South Carolina who threatened to secede & in 1833 a bill was authorized to give Jackson the power to use the military against South Carolina should they secede. Both the Tariff of 1832 and 1828 were declared unconstitutional but the damage had been done, and it was the beginnings of animosity between the north and the south that simmered for the next two decades. I know Louisiana had the highest number of free blacks that enlisted in the Civil War, so yes, there were blacks who fought for the Confederacy. It differed from state to state how they raised their armies and how they were organized.
This is why people say knowledge is power
As a Canadian, I know the basics about Confederacy, but wow those facts you just laid out. I've been trying to educate people but most just wont listen. I was sitting here earlier thinking to myself and wondering if there was any way I could get in contact with Mr. Trump and see if he would give a speech saying exactly what you just said. Someone needs to stop the madness. BLM has found their way into Canada and I'm sick of it. I think you, however, should write those words down again get them to your president and suggest to him about making a speech before the entire country. I'm going to copy and past your words here but I will remove the part, "I have been a student of." Maybe if people start looking into it they will realize it was nothing to do with abolishing slavery.
Someone who has done research
Great job for telling the truth
Bayan1905 Great information! Thanks for the education. I didn’t know all of that! I was told that the Civil War was and wasn’t about slavery all at the same time. That Lincoln primarily wanted to keep the Union together and he would do that with or without Slavery. Slavery was actually something of a side issue. However, in the end Lincoln decided that he could do both: 1. Keep the Union Together and 2. Abolish slavery throughout the USA 🇺🇸. People AREN’T being taught all of this in school and therefore only understand the light glossy veneer and react ignorantly!
Bayan1905 Like you said it differed by state but wasn’t freedom promised to slaves in exchange for military service that is for fighting for the Confederacy??
Thank you for encouraging personal understanding and self teaching. Too many just regurgitate the narrative they’ve been fed. I have done so much research, it completely changed my perspective on the South and the Civil War.
My grandfather was born in 1855 and was a drummer with Braxton Bragg's unit. He wrote down in his memoirs about serving with the confederate army as well as his opinions about slavery and how that had changed his life after the war. I am sorry that I have no links to that memoir, just a handwritten paper copy that we are planning on making that digital for preservation. My grandfather said that he was shocked at seeing FREE black men in the Confederate Army. He was able to talk with a few of them to ask them why they would serve in the Confederate Army. For the first man he talked to, this was the reply he received: "There were few plantations to work on, most had been burned down or trashed by union soldiers. A confederate officer had told him that he would receive freedom and citizenship (my grandfather is relaying a message and was not African American, just a poor boy from Louisiana) as would all of his family". The second black soldier told my grandfather that serving with the Confederacy meant that he had work to do and a place to stay, so he worked as a teamster, or cook or blacksmith. My grandfather (Orelouis Callegion) after the civil war, started a plantation in Morganza, Louisiana. Don't get excited, plantations are just farms. Grandpa after seeing the death and destruction of the soldiers on both sides decided that any black persons could have a job on his farm with a cabin to live in (provided the lumber), a share of the crops at harvest and also to live off of, free medical help (yes, my grandmother). At the end of the civil war, no one wanted to hire blacks or poor white men. Remember carpet baggers? But my grandfather was building a legacy and as he said "A black man's blood is just as red as mine and if God can't see a difference, why should I." I have opinions about the Civil War and everything that goes with it, but as John said, my opinions are my own and "you" should formulate your own. Now I did find 2 links, not associated with the previous and I hope that these 2 sites will assist you with any questions you might have. But in John's question, YES there were many free black men who served with the Confederate Army and for many suprising reasons. Please check out: BlBlack Confederates: Truth and Legend | American Battlefield Trust (battlefields.org)ack ; Civil War Soldiers - Facts, Death Toll & Enlistment - HISTORY
I think we letting the narrow mindedness of a few people rule our freedom of the majority of the people...
@Leo Peridot The Democratic party started those, the Democratic party didn't want to free the slave, but the Republican's went against them and passed the law to free the slaves. Research for yourself and you'll find out I'm right.
@Leo Peridot What you are saying is not true. Whoever told you this is lying. The Democrats are the ones that was connected to the kKK. The Democrats didn't even want to free the slaves, but thank goodness the Republican party didn't agree with them, so see the Democrats are the one who's racist and do all they can to divide us.
I stand by my post. Everyone yes do your own research that way you'll hopefully find out the truth.
@Eric Tasaico Thank you for bringing that to my attention.
@@donnaallen2207 You are so confused you fool. That was then and this is now:The party who is the most anti - black hard core racist organization today is of course the Republiscum party. Both parties are racist to the core but the Republiscum party takes the white hoods by far. Happy trails.
With most actors putting their opinions forward and condemning the police, John is a breath of fresh air. He's very open minded and sees things the way they actually are. He backs up everything with proof and not opinions. John is one of those guys you could sit all Saturday afternoon and just talk with him. You feel good when he arrives, and you feel even better after talking to him.
Bill you are so right!
Yeah, racists do love other racists, don't they?
@@reh3884 there is no proof to your statement so be gone troll!
There was no proof given? He gave everyone an assignment. I did my research. And it was, historically , counter to the message the blacks served nobelly, faithfully and honorably for the Confederacy. We are entitled to opinions but we can not refute facts.
If anyone is defending the Confederacy and minimizing the intent of why the south fought the war for any other reason than to own slaves...they are NOT asking tough questions they are (as Mr Schneider is) just pushing false "lost cause" Confederate propaganda that's been pushed since they lost the civil war. After the civil war the Confederacy had to attempt to re brand themselves as less evil. After all, they lost. Lost, yes, but even that didn't stop most southerners from finding new and effective ways to spread their hate and racism. They hid in plain sight....and the Confederate flag was a most useful tool in spreading their hate. This fact makes it hard to accept anyone defending the confederate flag. Some might truly believe the flag is anything but racist. These are the ignorant people we should fear most. Those who likely never understand that even if there's a .0005 % that the Confederate has been used as a racist tool (i'm sure that % is way higher)...that it should be discarded. The historical significance of the Confederate flag leans more towards racism then it does towards other claims. for this reason alone it should be discarded. Of course the Confederate flag is used throughout the south in 2020. it goes beyond historical context. Imagine if Disney remade the Song of the South for 2020 and kept in all the racial stereotypes, and blatant racism of it's production year, to say nothing of other films like Gone with the Wind. Context does matter. The attempt to convince people that the Confederate flag represents something completely different today is a total fail. Why? Look at the Swastika. It's funny....I'm pretty sure Mr Schneider would NOT defend the Swastika. Ironic, isn't it? After all....all the people who do support the Swastika in 2020 claim that symbol represents something completely different....white pride, or something like that. Does anyone believe the Swastika represents anything other than hate??? Here is the crux. People Like John Schneider push hate and claim its love. see to problem here??? Mr Schneider asks hard questions just like the Roman Catholic church does about its pedophile priest does, oh wait, I'm sorry....the church blames the victims. Hahahahahahahahah. My mistake. John Schneider is surely not blaming the slaves....surely he's not siding with the Confederate leaders who claimed slaves were better off as slaves than where they came from. I'm sure this southern pride he has for the flag comes from a deep seated love of the south and a hatred for those who fought for the right to own slaves. Most people who defend the Confederate flag find it easy to disregard any negative claim against said flag. Maybe I'm wrong and Mr Schneider is asking the hard questions.......or maybe he's simply a racist apologist spinning his views to maintain and promulgate them.
I have been researching after finding out through genealogy my 2x gr grandfather enlisted in the Confederate army, and his brother enlisted in the Union. I read many articles without feeling a need to keep up with sources. I was doing this to sort it out in my own min. As a resident of West Virginia where the mountainous terrain did not lend itself to the plantation life or need for slaves I was very driven to learn more about why our country was so divided. More than anything, I see how history is twisted and manipulated in today’s society. Made me think, “What if I thought I knew why we fought was wrong.” I learned Abraham Lincoln was a Republican.” What? I read enough to find that Virginia had ,in fact, tried to stop further slave trade in colonial times, but the crown stopped them. If they twisted history then as they do now, I needed to read and study history which I did. Many members of both the Confederate and the Union army had only a vague idea of why they were fighting. States rights were a big issue , as the Northern States were becoming quite busy with overriding the rights of the Southern states. Finally I decided to read “THE Rise and Fall of the Confederate Government” by Jefferson Davis. I found him to be very articulate and he believed as deeply in the cause of State’s rights as Lincoln seemed bent on not dissolving the Union. It was to become more advantageous to verbalize it as a war on slavery, because it is always unpopular to be a bully over an underdog. Chapter X in the book spells it out very nicely, as to why Jefferson Davis felt they were fighting “The War of the Rebellion.” As it is today, there is controversy over everything, and nobody willing to look at the strengths of both sides. Abraham Lincoln was a great Republican fighting for a cause he deeply believed in. Jefferson Davis was not an advocate of slavery as he has been painted, but he deeply believed the Federal government was infringing on the rights of the states. Now I need to look at it from another perspective, as to why Afro Americans would volunteer to fight for the Confederacy. I know they did, but I need to learn why. Thank you, John, for making me think instead of listen to bozos give the news the way they want us to see it.
Thanks for the comment, well written. From what I I have read, it seems they were concerned with states rights, the rights of a state to be a slave state or a free state. They also were clearly not happy about the outcome of the elections and possibly fear the growing power of the abolitionist republicans. Interesting points you have made
I am also reading it was more about state taxes. And how to handle the governing of the New wild West territories. South wanted small government, and that the individual states made the laws and handles all taxes. So No Federal Taxes at all. More of a "Thomas Jefferson" stile of governing. Like how the country all started. The North wanted big government controlling everything, which is what we ended up with today that is destroying everything.
** Thomas Jefferson also helped dissolve the first Central banking system and warned us never to allow it again.! But they snuck back in with IRS and so called "Federal Reserve" that is not federal at all. It's private owned banks. (Not good)
Quotation: "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered.... I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.... The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs."
--Thomas Jefferson
Here you go, "The Creature from Jekyll Island" here is a video of the guy that wrote that book, that explains it all, he explains it in this video here... It's absolutely nuts that crooked elitist got away with duping people into letting them create a IRS, and a so called "federal reserve", that has nothing to do with our government at all... It's all owned by private banks.!!
It's time we Stop Central banking again.!
@@cawthorne6992 Yes, when I steer clear of the newer authors and delve into reading all I can from what was written around that time, I get a completely different idea of how important state's rights were, taxation unfair at times, lots of bullying. South wanted states' rights because they feared the very thing we are enduring now, Slavery was one of the worst things ever committed, because I believe deeply in equality for everybody including the rich and poor. But, most slave trade was done by the north and with northern ships, so everybody was guilty of this inhumanity. It is like in our country today when the Feds ride herd over the states.
All soldiers in the Confederate Army fought to create an independent country (once the Civil War began) in which slavery would be legal and expand in its borders. Had they won; Southerners in those states would not be citizens of the United States, they would be citizens of a separate pro-slavery country. Davis never got diplomatic recognition from Britain and France partly because of widespread hostility to slavery in their populations. The Confederates always demanded the removal of the Emancipation Proclamation as a condition for an armistice and a negotiated settlement. Black slaves allowed to serve in the Confederate Army (which was a desperate and internally controversial move by the Confederacy near War's end) did so with a master's permission , and the promise of individual freedom after the War's end. At that point, they would be free either way. (The Lincoln Administration having committed to abolition by then) West Virginia was a loyalist area of Virginia during the Civil War. It wasn't part of the Confederacy; although undoubtedly it had pro-Confederates living there. Yes, Lincoln was the first Republican President. He ran in 1860 on a platform of using the Federal government to prevent slavery's Westward expansion. (Something all states that eventually joined the Confederacy opposed) The Republicans were not uniformly opposed to slavery in general. Davis certainly favoured the creation of a separate pro-slavery country , his personal views on the subject are not relevant for that reason.
Yes, even as a Canadian ; I did know Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican President of the United States. (Republican Party as founded in the mid nineteenth century)
True history is not taught anymore. My dad got his PhD in History! Bruce Caton wrote many wonderful books and articles about the Civil War. I'm sure he was a Civil War historian , wasn't he? You're a good man. John, I love that you make us think💜💜
.THE GOOD OLD BOYZ ruclips.net/video/8B58nxWsFi8/видео.html
More true history is being taught now and each progressing year than ever before. More minority history is coming to light.
When I was in grade school in the 1970's we did a report on The civil war Southern slave owners of which at least 10,000 were Black and supported the Confederacy. Further more the slave issue while important to the south was less so than there States Rights, Sovereignty and Economic health of which they thought Lincoln was going to eliminate! There are many more reasons and here is another odd question Why did Robert E Lee Free his slaves long before the war ever happened yet he fought for the Virginia on the side of the Confederacy + He and his wife donated their Plantation to the USA and it is now known as the Arlington National Cemetery!
Nice
Robert E Lee’s plantation was confiscated, not donated.
B.WebbBodyWorks and they built the monument in Mrs. Lee’s rose garden to ensure she would never want to live there again. There is something to be said about how he treated the slaves at his home. He (illegally) taught them to read and write, provided excellent medical attention and many built a town around the home and stayed after the freeing of the slaves. Lee was offered the Union Army and was an excellent General he just could bear the thought of fighting against his “beloved Virginia”. State pride meant something back then.
Because my Grandfather was always against slavery and secession. He was loyal to Virginia and turned down Lincolns offer to oversee the Union Army. The tariffs were the root cause of the Civil War not slavery, The left has always sought to use slavery as a political weapon
steve s you might want to read alexander stephens declaration of succession
Great job ! From Alabama. Dukes of Hazard !
John,
I grew up in East Tennessee, the same little town that Tom Wopat lived in when he was married to Lisa. I loved the Dukes of Hazzard , and it was a true family Christian based show for all people to enjoy. Most people don’t have the correct information about the confederate leaders like Stonewall Jackson, a Sunday school teacher that taught black Christian folks. The most important thing is over 80 percent of the confederacy that had soldiers didn’t even own a slave. It was the government taxing the cotton plantations and trying to control our money like they are doing in today’s world. One last thing to remember is that the African people sold their own into slavery and was involved in the slave trade in New Orleans , and one of the largest plantations in Florida was owned by a black lady.
Thank you John you are so right.
Loved watching Dukes of Hazzard Fri nights as as a kid. Sad to see it’s getting pulled off air everywhere.
Michael Haba still going strong in Great Britain shown on TV most nights.👍🏻🥳🥳
@@gbjanuary where on TV in GB ?
Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that count darkness as light, and light as darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
You know what time we are in! Stay safe, brother.
nice speech but not a believer. I want to see a little justice in the here and now.
Do not block the path of righteousness. Consumption of 'self'. Key..occurence.
Thank you for touching on this matter. Ive been trying to get people to look at the flag as itself rather then what represents it for a different view. This way people can understand the matter form a different prospective. People when they look at a flag they only see what it represents and nothing more. A flag can have more then one use as well as its use can be changed. The confederate flag is part of our history and must be respected for future generations to view and learn. people get offended way to easy thees days. If you don't like something or someone for what they like or do whatever reason that's ok but do not hinder them or others because of it. Just because someone likes a flag dose not mean they support what it stands for/stood for. For example I love the cool look of the Nazi flag but i absolutely hate what they did. If you don't like the confederate flag if your offended by it Thats fine look away dont try to remove it.
..THE GOOD OLD BOYZ ruclips.net/video/8B58nxWsFi8/видео.html
True. I believe that in the context of "The Dukes of Hazzard," the Confederate flag was meant to represent, instead of racism, rebellion against authority.
I have read and love history. Great that you are a critical thinker. You have the answer as I do. Slavery was the excuse, money was the reason. High tariffs on Cotton, the Souths Blood. Peace
Right on John! I don't think that The Dukes of Hazzard was/is a racist show. The way the Confederate Flag was used was, in my opinion, to reflect the rebel side of the Duke family. I do understand if the flag is seen as a racist flag in general today, but it surely was never the intention of the show and the values the General Lee as a fictional car stood for.
Last but not least, I think it's crucial to question everything in your life and do the proper research in whatever it is you want to understand properly.
I was raised that the Confederate flag is a symbol of rebelling. And I live in South Carolina. That definition of that flag will always stay with me
I'm 19 and from Ohio and I grew up looking at the confederate flag as a flag that stood for rebelling against something or someone I never grew up thinking it was a sign of hatred or racism and I look at everyone as an equal because that's how they should be treated no matter their skin color or religion
I don't think the rebel flag on the dukes Hazzard car or show was disrespectful it wasn't racist people need get that threw there head the show should have never been took off the air the show was clean and respectful family show the rebel flag is history not racist bring back dukes of Hazzard
First it's not a rebel flag it is the Christian flag of St Anthony. It is also the battle flag of the Confederacy. The actual Confederate States flag was totally different originally it looked too much like the United States flag so they changed it.
@@lynwoodcampbelljr.4597 Because nobody gives a dam about slavery...
This stuff going on in 2020 is worst than a Twilight Zone episode. Don't think anything going to be the same no more.
They said that in WW 1 and WW 2 also, it will take a war to put it back.
@@fishoutofwater5913 Yeah... I'm afraid that's where it'll end up
Fish Out of Water what kind of war certainly not nuclear 🤯
bring on the murder hornets
Collective Memory has been extended through the internet. We are in a game changing paradigm of world history
This is the way every history instructor should approach, really every major question of history. I had a political science teacher in high school, that when I think back, with all my accumulated knowledge over the years....to this day I can't tell you with any certainty which party she leaned toward in elections.
Inasmuch as I'm a cousin to Thomas Jonathan "Stonewall" Jackson, I took a keen interest in a book written by historian James I. Robertson, Jr. entitled, simply, Stonewall. It was Robertson's contention that the War Between the States was fought over states' rights, and I whole heartedly agree. So it's no surprise that 'free black men' enlisted in the Confederacy; they were defending their home turf. (I cannot recommend more highly the book "Stonewall", incidentally. I lived and breathed what has come to be called the Civil War in reading its 900+ pages. And to think that I'm related to Jackson (through his mom, I believe) isn't what you think. I'm not of an ego about it; rather, humbled. I couldn't shine his shoes.)
The Confederate War Aim was independence from the United States.They failed to get recognition from Britain and France , because neither of those countries wanted to be seen to be backing a country dedicated to legal slavery in its borders and any Western territory it managed to annex. The "States Rights" argument in relation to slavery predates the War itself, as well as the Confederacy's formation as a potential country. Lincoln's position before the War, and in its early stages was that the Federal Government had the power to halt slavery's Westward expansion. He was not an outright abolitionist then in terms of his policy position. He also opposed an offensive war against the South, prior to the attack on Fort Sumpter , and the beginning of Hostilities. Lincoln's position on using the Federal government to halt slavery's Westward expansion was unacceptable to the States that left the Union. In any case, if the South had won the Civil War, many Southerners and some Westerners would not be US citizens. (Assuming the new country, or countries lasted into our day) It's also probable;, that the territory now known as the United states would not be home to a Global Power, if the Confederates had won the Civil War.
@@iaingraham7586 -- The states did not leave the union; they were not allowed to, even though there's nothing in the U.S. Constitution disallowing secession. The War Between the States had nothing to do with slavery, although history books are chock full of lies in that regard. The "States Rights" argument had little or nothing to do with slavery. The North was unfairly taxing the Southern states, crippling the Southern economy, as I recall.
@@marilynguinnane4663 They tried to leave the Union , and seek recognition as an Independent country. (they didn't get it) Lee saw himself as a citizen of Virginia, which is why he turned down Lincoln's offer of Union Command. Virginia had voted to leave the United States by that time. They didn't leave the Union because the Confederates were defeated. Had they won , the South (parts that joined them) would not be part of the United States today.Those places are still in the United States, simply because the Confederacy was defeated.
@@iaingraham7586 --- Yes, okay, the confederate states 'attempted' to leave the union, as was their right !!! To reiterate, there is nothing in the U.S. Constitution that disallows secession. I think that the world might have been better off had the South won. Maybe, for instance, Franklin Roosevelt wouldn't have been elected, and since FDR goaded Japan into attacking the U.S., it's possible that that would never have occurred. This country got too big for its britches. The CIA takes duly elected leaders out, and you know what 'out' means. ETC.
John you are such a good speaker and I can tell you are well educated. Thank you for this video and making us free Americans put our thinking caps on and do our homework. Very well said and I'm glad you are opening eyes...whatever anyone's opinions are. Great conversation!
Good work John! We should all be champions of critical thinking. Question EVERYTHING you hear from everybody. Go research it for yourself. Most people saying something have at least part of the story wrong if not more.
I had a Great Grandfather and a G.G.Grandfather, who was in the Civil War and an uncle who asked Questions to them, they were gonna stay out of the war, until neibors and friends kelped getting attacked by the union solders, True Story , But as you know the winner writes History.
LOVE YA BROTHER!!
Keep up the fight because I AM not stopping either!!! As WITHIN so WITHOUT!!!
Praise the almighty Lord Amen & Amen !!!
❤️❤️❤️🎵😎☘️🦋🌹🌼🌞♓️
You remind me of the Duke family. I'm from a black neighborhood; National City, California and all us kids loved the Dukes. Still do.
Loved this assignment and my son did a school project on this not so long ago. As a surprise I took him on a trip to the battlegrounds from Illinois to Nashville. Opened my eyes up and learned so much from our trip. Thanks for sharing this with us.
I would suggest reading a biography of General Lee. Clouds of Glory is the name. You’d be surprised to learn of some his thoughts on war and slavery. While I agree war is a rich mans game it’s the common citizen that has to fight it. Yes the civil war was about slavery. It was written into each state’s constitution after succession. However only the rich owned slaves and wanted to fight to keep them. If you think back to the time the war was going on most people never traveled farther than a 50 mile radius of their birthplace. Most were poor farmers trying to make a living. So the north was an invading army to them and they had to defend their homeland. Most all battles were fought on southern soil. Most of the people who fought and died didn’t own a slave. I have a 4th generation grandfather who never owned a slave. He wanted no part in this war. But when Mississippi was invaded he felt he had no choice but to defend his home. There’s more than just one side to every story.
I think we already established that most soldiers did not fight over slavery nor states' rights. But the leadership and rich people did. And over succesion of the Southern states (over slavery).
Thank you for this new view! I actually didn’t know this 👍
And the annexation of Mexican territory during the Mexican American war? California, Texas, Arizona, Nevada Mexicans we protecting their homeland and were called banditos and outlaws
Put another way , the North's victory helped shape the World we know today.
....THE GOOD OLD BOYZ ruclips.net/video/8B58nxWsFi8/видео.html
Good points. Far too many in this country draw conclusions before knowing facts. I often say they make dollar decisions on a dime worth of knowledge.
Mr. Schneider you are a logical person. Not to many out there it seems.
Wow John!! Thanks so much for asking this question.
First, I ignorantly assumed that all people of color in the South were enslaved.
Second, I had no idea some volunteered to fight for the South.
Third, I didn't take your word for it, I actually looked it up.
Fourth, I'm not ashamed to say that I own a Confederate flag, AND I own a diecast replica of the General Lee which plays the horn tune. I'm a proud Black man living in Texas, blessed to be American and honored to live the life I live. 🙏🏾 #HAHN #DOHC
Randal Ansile they were NOT paid. They had MASTERS. What do you mean “free”. Please explain.
So 200k UNITED STATES COLORED TROOPS with 175 regiments PICS AND NONE WITH CONFEDERATE?
www.afroamcivilwar.org/about-us/usct-history.html
www.battlefields.org/learn/topics/united-states-colored-troops
Mike T I never mentioned pay. So not sure of your outrage there. 2nd, there actually were Blacks in the South that were not slaves. It's unfortunate that education convinced some that blacks could only be saves, and stuck on plantations in the South. That's fake news.
Randal Ansile sure a handful were. But the MAJORITY 90+% were not free and were terrorized by the KKK, killed for their land, etc. I mentioned pay because you had to get paid to be recognized as a soldier. FREE LABOR is a slave
Mike T Fighting to protect your own property and financial interests is not free or slavery. It's self-preservation. There were Blacks in the South who didn't trust that the North would allow freed men of color to keep their lands, businesses. The KKK while a radical group were not all "radical" in action everywhere. I get it's easier to bunch everyone into the same basket. The truth is, just as it is today, not everyone Black is living under the subjective view of being oppressed. Same then, same now.
Randal Ansile what property 😂? Owning another human being!!!?? Call it what it is. “Self-preservation “ is STILL fighting for your right to OWN. Of course there were misinformed Blacks and ONLY A HAND FULL fighting in the South. You can barely find pics while having 175 regiments and over 200k in the North. I get it, only the North had cameras 😂. “Not all KKK were radical”. You’re right they had soup kitchens for Blacks. Only placed stakes burning in 1 of 2 Black homes right 😂.
Mr .Schneider if my teachers when I was back in school were only half as interesting as you I might have enjoyed school. Thank you sir !!
Another great video ! Thank you Mr. Schneider:) Much love and respect. Dukes was one of the happiest memories of my childhood. So thank you for that too.
History is a story that today’s people tell about the past. It is constantly in flux. That’s why all Americans need to tell our stories to represent all of us.
Dukes is a landmark show about family, honor, and common goodness. You and Tom created iconic characters that made southerners more than Beverly Hillbillies or clansmen. As a Texan who grew up watching Dukes, you gave a positive spin to southern identity that many of us still cherish into our middle age.
The fact you and Tom are not...ahem...born southerners speaks to your legacy as an actor. Forty years later you still hold a place in the hearts of many. Keep speaking your mind and giving insight into one of the most influential tv shows of all time.
I shared the Dukes DVDs with my son. He loved the show. Sorry to tell you that Boss Hogg is his favorite character. RIP Sorrell Booke. But take comfort that the legend of the Duke boys has been passed to the next generation. After all you were just “straightenin’ the curves, never meanin’ no harm.”
Keep posting videos and speaking your mind. By the way, why are you not a billionaire by selling “authentic” Bo’s General Lees at Maserati prices? Let us know how much those babies go for.
History is written by the winners.
Boss Hogg might've been the most memorable character from that show but I was in 5th grade when "Dukes of Hazzard" was the #1 show on TV and every blond boy at my school imitated Bo Luke like he was a superhero
Yeah, "southern identity" with a terrorist flag on top.
RB I loved the show too. Never really realized what the flag meant because I was in kindergarten at the time. That’s how indoctrination works and very few of get the opportunity to break through it in life. I’m glad that I got to examine my own ideas and internal structures and reject thinking like the belief that my kids should be indoctrinated into this cult.
John, keep on keeping on with what your doing. your still a model to follow for all young men out there.
Passage of the Morrill Tarrif act was the primary reason the southern states formed The Confederate States Of America.
John, you are right on . I always think of Bob Dylan’s song , “ The times they are a changing” . And the point I’m trying to say is that , in that song is ‘ and don’t criticize what you don’t understand ‘ , I abide by this saying . I just wish people would read about our American history, and learn things before making comments that they don’t understand. I’m totally against taking down those monuments, because it represents our history ! Why now are they offending people ? It’s a shame. There is nothing wrong with displaying the confederate flag either. People have to understand ,that is a part of our history, whether you are from the north or south. P.S. I live in Somers,NY just up the road from Good old MT.Kisco 😊
Solid, considerate, and profound as always. Mr. John, I come to you to see what you will say on topics as they occur and you never let me down. I wish I could express myself as genuine and intelligently as you do. My great grandfather fought for the CSA. He is buried in the same church cemetery where we buried my mother, and where I will be buried someday. He was a poor man. A share cropper and walked home from the war. My mom studied our genealogy and I have her documents. She wanted me to understand our heritage. She wanted me to know history. She took me to every old library in TN, digging through microfishe and old dusty hand written ledgers, census records, death certificates. I treasure this education.
My family is also from Tennessee and fought in the Civil War on the Confederate side, but were never slave owners. They could barely afford the clothes on their backs. I hope people learn where they came from, and not try to forget what happened
U should be super proud of your heritage but the fact is the confederacy were traitors who rebelled and wished to over throw the USA . U can’t be loyal to two flags . Slavery or whether ur family were slave owners is neither here nor there. Like I said u should be proud of your heritage remember honor and pass that pride down to your kids and so forth. Still the USA as a whole should never had honored or erected statues of any traitors to the USA. By all means hang the flag in your yard I’m Mexican American from Texas 5 generations the confederate flag doesn’t spur any racist opinion to me but it does represent division and an attempt to topple the greatest country USA. U can speak many languages pray to any God but in this country but I was taught we only pledge salute and honor one flag as a nation. Just my opinion on the subject from my point of view race and slavery aside. We stand under one flag in this country
@@UrbanOutlaw713 you can.. we have the english flag scotish flag welsh flag and our union flag all loyal to all .....,but then our left wing communist party are the smallest group,so no influence plus we don,t believe our left wing media.... ware as in the,, usa people believe the most silly nonsense, the twisted left wing media spout...for example the left wing protesters,that are rioting peacefully .is covered so// ..protesting good peacefully.good rioting omitted. um/..but then when the ,right turns up to stop the rioting the media call them wright wing extremist who are rioting so cover so./,, extremist bad,,,rioting added bad... ,so the media portray their communist friends as protesters ,and the right as extremist ..and thats one brain washing example there are many more ,we no longer listen to our sh// sterring media america though hook line and sinker,,
@@UrbanOutlaw713 Actually, the South believed the Articles of Confederation, not of the CSA, but of the Colonies which FREELY gathered together. They read the Constitution in a way that differed from Abe Lincoln. If they entered freely into an association, they could freely dis-associate. It's only after the Civil War that this concept was made null & void.
Agree with Jennie. I had ancestors that fought and died on both sides of the war. No, southerners were not traitors. They felt their sovereignty was being violated, which was what their ancestors fought and died to achieve from the tyranny of King George. Unfortunately the back seat drivers of today feel like they understand the minds of a new nation whose stories of survival were told by to them by their grandparents. I have read many of those first hand accounts of which Schneider speaks while doing my own research of my ancestors. One of those ancestors was my great great grandfather who arrived in Georgia alone and with nothing just five years before the Civil War started. He was a shoemaker who owned nothing and barely spoke English, but he felt compelled to support his state and defend his new home. He was no traitor. One cannot judge the actions of 1860 society with the eyes of 2020. Also, at the time every aspect of the United States economy and that of much of the world centered around the cotton industry. Those who owned the slaves were not the only ones who kept them in chains. The wealth and prosperity of the north was a direct result of the cotton industry, the booming worldwide garment industry and global trade. Nobody’s hands were clean in that regard. Even if a family had nothing to do with the cotton, garment or trade industries, they directly benefited from the general prosperity and growth of the time, which was a direct result of the nation’s cash cow...the cotton industry. There were indeed many free blacks that willfully enlisted in the Confederate military or fought as militia. Likewise, there were many free black men that enlisted with the Union forces. There were also slaves who ran off to join the Union troops. It wasn’t simply just an issue of slavery. It was much more complicated than that, and the war represented a myriad of issues in the minds of every person at every level of standing, including the slaves. If you think it was all about slavery and that the Confederates were just a bunch of traitors, I challenge you to actually do the research that Schneider is suggesting. You will quickly gain a new perspective. Slavery was surely a big part of the war at its core, but not as simply as you may believe. Educate yourself with the actual accounts of the many viewpoints and then form your conclusions. That is your challenge.
RESPECT THE DEAD.
How
Yes. We should respect the valiant abolitionist and enslave people who paid generation after generation with their lives while providing wealth and comfort to the people who brutalized them. It is all about respect.
Mrs. Patterson not by tearing up the things they believed in
@@thistlemoon1
I think of Gidion
@@belkyhernandez8281
What is respect?
An act or a thought?
The man is soooo wise. Brains AND beauty!! Who would have thought !!!!!
Right on John
Find your own truth.. when you do, freedom will mean something.. or not.
My siblings and I appreciate the childhood memories generated by you and fellow cast mates. And thanks for the thought provoking question.
I grew up in the 70s and I remember what they taught us in school so when all these liberal started rewriting history I knew better so why researched it back when everyone what is losing their minds and name-calling. Civil War was caused basically because of 12 South considered unfair representation. The South had as much land as the north but the north was more heavily populated and got more Representatives. As a result they were able to appropriating more money for projects having to do with a North and things that would help Northern industry. Which the South considered to be unfair since because of they're booming economy they were paying in more taxes than the people of North. They felt that they were being taken advantage of because the north was using their money for stuffed up there. Basically the war was about whether or not the southern states had the right to dissolve the Union they had freely signed up for to begin with. The South wanted to rule themselves. The truth is less than 1% of the population even owned slaves. Slavery was on its way out but no one wanted to tell them they didn't have the right to do it and it was only through trickery and holding back information that they were able to pass it through Congress and the Senate. There were no representatives from the south or it would have been easily blocked. Which it should have been abolished long before that. However they did Ben the rules to get rid of it. Also it's important to know that Native Americans also own slaves. As did some free black people. In fact the very first slave owner in the United States was a black man. Another black man owed him money and he sued him in court and won him as a slave. This is why I get so tired of the liberal narrative. They claim all white people owned slaves. While it was less than 1% at the very height of slavery which was already starting to wane at the time of the Civil War. And 2/3 are the Americans today are descended from immigrants who immigrated after the Civil War which means the white people in America today were not slave owners only a very few would have been. In fact their relatives were not even in the country when it was going on. The north was extremely desperate and it promised freedom to any black person that would serve in the army. So basically people caught with a North to gain their freedom. While the black people in the South fought in the War because they loved the South. Kind of makes you think about that. There are all kinds of historical pictures with black Confederate Army members. People who were as proud of the South as the people up north were proud of the North.
Personally I am glad the slaves were free it should have happened a lot sooner. Idealistically we should never have had slaves. I find it extremely telling that black people today Embrace Islam. And reject Christianity because it is The White Man's religion. The so-called slave owners religion. While the fact of the matter is it is the Muslims who were the slave traders who brought them to America in the first place. And they were a hell of a lot more brutal than the slave owners in America. They brought them to other countries as well such as Cuba Haiti and Jamaica. They also took them to the Middle East. The reasons there are not a lot of black people in the Middle East is because Muslims consider them to be animals and required them to be castrated before they were allowed to come into the country. It's hard to have descendants when you've been castrated. It's also fair to note that these people still own slaves and the descendants of slaves that are mixed with Muslims due to raping of the black women over there. It's also fair to note that it was their own black Countryman that sold into slavery in the first place. And had it not been for the slave Traders they would have been killed outright because that's what their Countryman wanted to do they only spared them because of financial gain. Yeah they want to embrace Africa and their long-lost relatives over there. Who would have killed their ancestors had it not been for the slave Traders. This is what happens when you let liberals teach history and twist everything around to fit a narrative of hate. The bottom line is not a single person in the United States his alive today that was a slave or who owned a Slave. It is also fair to note that the same Democrat Party that was in charge of the South also started the KKK after losing the war to suppress the black people. And they waged a silent hundred year war of Terror against a black people. Keeping them segregated in schools to keep them as uneducated as they could and to keep them in fear so they can control them. It was the Republicans once again in 1965 that voted to give them the right to vote. The Democrats have been fighting them for a long time. And when they found out they were going to lose they started using welfare to enslave them and separate their families. Welfare is a Cancer and may have used it against black people to destroy their family units. They have started rumors and lies claiming the party switch positions. Which is a lie because you can still look it up and nowhere has these wife long Republicans Or democrats ever switched parties in Masse. It doesn't even make sense to say they did what would they possibly have to gain from it? They are suggesting that people who used to be racist stopped being racist and started caring. And people who used to care stopped caring and started being racist. This is so ridiculous but you must remember they had kept black people segregated and uneducated so it was easier to fool people who were uneducated. And they have past the tradition of ignorance down through the generations to continue to vote for the Democrats. Basically selling their votes for welfare which keeps them in poverty. I should also mention that it was the Democrat Party that started the Negro Project which was the original name for Planned Parenthood. They hate black people so much that they wanted to kill them before they were even born to keep their numbers low. That's why after all this time they only make up 13% of the population. The number one cause of death among black people is abortion. The number two cause of death is black-on-black homicide. A black person is twice as likely to be killed by another black person than by someone of another race. While a white person is more times as likely to be killed by a black person then by a member of their own race. Cops kill 10 times as many white people as they do black people. The way the welfare works is it encourages crime. and black people commit a disproportionate amount of the crime. So less than 6% of the black population commence over 40% of the violent crime in America. Everything can be traced back to blame the Democrats who are quick to blame everyone else and try to pretend like they are helping. I have researched all of this because I'm always getting in arguments on social media with liberals who try to act like they know more than anyone else. And knowledge is power and if you are powerful in knowledge they cannot walk on you like they do when you are not. With me I usually get called all kinds of names followed by being reported and blocked but that is what happens when these people lose an argument. And the crazy thing is most of the problems we are having today is caused by and carried out by white people. Who are trying to whitesplaining for black people. Who are more than capable to speak for themselves and don't need these fools causing them problems
@Gee Mo Sorry friend.. it was the Irish that built America. The roads,canals, railroads, mines. They were desperate and they were far more educated than former slaves.
Thank you for your post!! People need to do a little research or just watch the news and it backs up everything you said about everyday crime!!
Even in the 70s we were being brainwashed. The Great Depression was caused by Capitalism and Socialism saved us...for example of a huge lie they fed us.
As an Australian, I appreciate you comment.
Can someone otherwise tell me how I'm supposed to listen to Shannon Sharpe's opinions on these matter? He seems really wound up.
@@renohuskerdu4592 100% but not nearly as bad
My great great great mother was married to a Union captain at the beginning of the war he was killed in combat at the end of the war she married a Confederate captain .. she had children by both .. So my family was both Union and Confederate... I honor both in my heritage
John what a riveting question! Those freeman of the south enlisted for the same reason the ones did form the north they were offered liberty and equality