What's to question? Asked about scariest moment and his answer either meant there were no scary moments or the scariest moment was thinking they may not get to go. If you trained for years to go, only to have it called off would be a scary thought
did not happen as in nothing scary happened as he trained for years in preparation for every possible situation. he could barely hear the questions being asked as well
Because it's not weird, it's him saying that they'd trained so hard for so many eventualities that fear wasn't part of the equation. They were test pilots, they already knew fear would kill them faster than most malfunctions.
@@tonykunkerino4087 As I said, they were test pilots, they knew that the minute they started feeling fear, it could lead to panic, and panic achieves nothing. Like pilots who will, despite being terrified, continue reporting for the black-box as a plane is crashing in the hope the information will prove useful, that rule applies _twice_ as hard as test pilots, test pilots are literally chosen on their ability to not panic or get scared in tense situations, that's actually part of the requirements for _being_ a test pilot in the first place. So, yes, it's perfectly normal for Buzz Aldrin to say that 'being scared' didn't happen, that's why he was chosen to go. And I see that good old 'I don't care whether we landed on the Moon but [insert textbook Moon Hoaxer argument here]' is raising its head again. Yes, strangely enough, technology developed in 1969 is out of date and not much use, in fact, our computing and heat-resistance technology is decades ahead of Apollo, because it's been decades since Apollo and we learned a lot from the technology, but there was no point hanging on to the manufacturing facilities for stuff that was out of date.
@@tonykunkerino4087 Your initial mistake is assigning the name 'handler' to the person with Buzz Aldrin, it already shows that you have assumed what their role is based on your bias. Secondly, they asked if he was scared, not if he felt 'fear', there is a difference between the two. He wasn't scared, even when he felt the adrenaline of fear, for the third time that was one of the criteria he had to meet in order to qualify for the astronaut program. He even at the end of his explanation says that, had the engines not fired it _could_ have been scary, but the situation never arose, so he wasn't scared, why worry about what _didn't_ happen? The comment you are referring to wasn't said by 'one of the heads of NASA', it was by Don Petit, an astronaut, and, once again, he is correct, until recently we did not have the equipment to return to the Moon with people, the original Apollo missions were about reaching the moon, there wasn't much interest in doing anything else until we recently started developing technology that could possibly make use of the Moon's resources, now the Artemis program etc. is looking at going back. I'm sorry to hear that me daring to respond to your accusations of me being a troll is so horribly inconvenient for you, I'm sure you'd much prefer it if people didn't defend themselves...
@@tonykunkerino4087 And you claimed that fear _had_ to be part of the equation, which is doesn't, that's what the training is for, to remove fear from the equation so you can do your job. I paraphrased what was said, stuff happened that could have been scary, but it didn't happen, everything worked at they took off just fine. And thanks for proving my point.
So at 30:17 a lady asks what was the scariest part about going, Buzz says "It didn't happen", but the more telling thing is that Buzz has a handler in case he messes up. So if we did go to the moon, and Buzz is telling the truth, why is there someone there to catch his mistakes?
Yes, the whole thing had been planned out and so when they asked him what was the scariest part, his reply was 'it didn't happen', in other words, he didn't get scared because he had rehearsed it so often. Why do people think that taking a 2 second statement completely out of context proves _anything_ ? Talk about twisting other people's words....
@@thegoodshepherd7777 Not really, it's more a case of Hoaxers taking ONE sentence out of an entire conversation and then presenting it in a way that looks incriminating. It's not at all that he's 'admitted it', in fact, he punched Bart Sibrel in the face for calling him a liar, which was well deserved. It's like when he had an interview with a little girl, the Moon Hoaxers showed an edited version of the interview in order to change the context of what he said and tried to claim he had 'admitted' then as well when he was clearly saying that we didn't go _back_ to the Moon after the Apollo missions.
And can Oxford please ensure that there are no idiots sitting behind legends such as this? This is not the first video I've watched of yours where children get to diminish a great talk in the background. Disgusting behaviour.... 9:17
@@mballer no one has ever been to the moon and they never will. It's been 60 years since they tried lying and told us they went. Even those who believe nasa must think that's suspect, not to mention all the cgi pictures of earth
Question: What was the scariest moment of the journey(To the Moon)? Answer: "Scariest?... It didn't happen... It could have been scary..."~Buzz Aldrin 2015 Q and A session, Oxford Union
First off - - Buzz never answered this to any question Second - - even if he did, apparently to you idiots, he is a valid source when he says something that fits your world view, and a liar when he contradicts it. This is the sign of an idiot; nothing more. In case you didn't understand, I'm calling you an idiot.
@dharmaqueen7877 You are providing an example of the very thing I am talking about. If you want to dismiss his claims, that's great. That's not what uou are doing. You are dismissing his claims which contradict the narrative you choose to accept, and accepting the claims which are in line. If you were consistent, you'd dismiss this claim as you interpret it just the same. But you don't. The quality of the source has nothing to do with the source; only the claim. It's a worthless methodology. You're also vastly misunderstanding his quote, but context clearly isn't important to you. If Buzz had first claimed that he never landed on the moon, and THEN claimed he did, you wouldn't dismiss the original claim. His words have nothing to do with what you choose to accept. You're just cherry picking anything that conforms to your world view and dismissing everything else. It's just the standard modus operandi for people like you. Nothing new here....
@@willoughbykrenzteinburg You are making a lot of assumptions about me based only on my disbelief. There are lots of things I don't believe because I am under no obligation to practice faith and I don't find the evidence on offer very compelling.
First question from the audience: How did you feel when you landed on the moon and looked back at the Earth. No answer. Instead he talked about his wives. WTF. Zero technical discussion about getting through the thermosphere. Zero discussion about how the moon feels when you walk on it. "The moon dust might be poisonous" he said ie we still don't know whether it is or not ? So zero tests have been done on the dust/rock that they bought back ? What was the scariest moment of the journey ? Answer: It wasn't scary. Circuit breakers and the ladder were the top topic for some bizarre reason along with swimming, pole-vaulting and meals he had with presidents. Should we go back to the moon with better technology? After no answer and rambling on he blamed the budget. Anyone who had been to the moon would have said yes we should go back immediately. Constantly trying to be funny instead of discussing the most amazing feat of mankind. If someone went to the moon they would actually talk about it rather than rambling on about absolute rubbish. If (big if) we went to the moon he did zero to prove it. Their first interview in 1969 after their return was also absolutely bizarre. Cheers Buzz we know everything about going to the moon now. Lol.
Good contribution and summary. Nothing really said from him, like a politician about the bush. If I had been on the moon, wow incredible feelings of being proud and overwhelmed about the extraordinairy experiences. But what is: He talks like he has been on a stage with grey dust in a studio with backdrops in the background making a video of 2,5 Hours lenght. And they were in the orbit of the earth for a few days, that is the feat. They have no idea about what the universe, the moon, the planets and stars really means, particulary Buzz Aldrin seems to be totally unaware and clueless about these subjects, he has no relation regarding these topics, like an ignorant.
Maybe he has some type of brain damage and / or mental disorder ? I’m 10 min in and it feels like he’s disconnected from the questions and just mumbling disconnected streams of thought . I’ve heard mentally ill junkies who talk exactly like that with the uncomfortably long pauses , almost talking to themselves , going on tangents related to their personal experiences that have nothing to do with what’s being talked about etc.
The disney lemaitre copernicus freemasonic luciferian hollywood sci-fi psy-op DECEPTION known as ‘outerspace’ is brainwashed, indoctrinated and deliberately propagated with an intricately detailed narrative to HIDE and DENY the existence of YHWH's Heavenly Kingdom and His Son Yahushua The Messiah above us ✝️ 🤦🏽♂️😭 🙌🏽 👼🏽 ruclips.net/video/7nFwPDZF_Z8/видео.html ruclips.net/video/UbYtkrTquXE/видео.html ruclips.net/video/AeIGrEtPMmE/видео.html
Met the man last night at the Cradle of Aviation museum. He signed a copy of his children's book for my daughter, and I'd love nothing more for her to get into a field related to space travel. Astrophysics, theoretical physics, engineering, etc. I drove 6 hours for her yesterday, 6 hours home today! You're an inspiration, Buzz! Or shall I say... Dr. Rendezvous!
30:07 I time stamped the lady's question. So here's what you should do when listening to this. Use your brains and ears (whether you're brainwashed or have selective hearing or not) and stop taking things out of context. Put 2 & 2 together. It's not rocket science quite literally at this point. It's common sense and the way you comprehend the question and answer given. The lady asked, "what was the *_scariest moment_* of the journey?" Aldrin replied, "It didn't happen." Now let me translate for those who may be a little slow. *_What was it that didn't happen in the journey?_* He said the *_"scariest moment"_* of the journey didn't happen, when he said, "it didn't happen." Clearly there is an entire 1:04:57 of this Q&A between Aldrin and the interviewers in the audience who have asked dozens of questions. And yall chose to take this question and answer entirely out of context because ppl like making things up, misconstruing, and misinterpreting things so that they seem like lies. You're essentially creating a delusional hypothesis rather than actually listening and gaining cold hard facts. If she were to ask the question differently and received the same answer, yall would still make these false claims that he had denied that the moon landing ever happened. I can't understand it for you so don't get upset when I say, "I told you so", after you dig deeper into his answer. There's so much more evidence that the moon landing happened than there is evidence that it didn't happen. Just do your research, stop taking things out of context and actually listen and use your ears. There are many, many other events similar to this that ppl are taking out of context and running with it as an, "oh, here's the proof, you heard it from the horses mouth, this or that did or didn't happen." It shouldn't come to a point where people, like me, have to point out the obvious. Edited for spelling.
@@pencilsniper sorry darling, he said it didn't happen as in the journey didnt happen. He's admitted many times. Watch the footage of the moon landing and everything else. It's tacky 1960s/1970s star wars effects.
@@1schlom It did happen. It impossible to actually fake a moon landing because they would need a very very VERY large area and a very very very large green screen the size of Texas. People are so delusion about this and believe what they want to believe, she asked about the scariest part of the journey. He said the scariest part never happened. Don't use the illogical standpoint because it doesn't make sense and it makes you sound crazy. And also, if it didn't happen, why is it when I zoom in with a telescope, I can see the American flag on the moon? It happened.
I saw him in the Gemini program when I was a teenager. He is a treasure. Thank you for this interview. He gets a lot of bad press from idiots who dont have a clue of all the facts and context. Its October 2024 and I just found this. Muchas Gracias, Vaya con Dios
Aldrin went through severe depression after the moon mission and also struggled with alcohol for years. I'm so glad he's been able to come out of this valley stronger and apparently at lot wiser. He is giving a lot to humanity
@@bastian6173 True. He is a liar, an actor and thief of tax dollars. Also incredibly violent as he assaults tax payers for asking him honest questions. He never went to jail because of his masonic ties.
30:17 he admits for the 3rd such time known footage wise that it didn't happen. 3 different times, 3 different people, same question...3 times the same answer--IT DIDN'T HAPPEN.
He answered the question as if he thought she asked the scariest thing that COULD have happened. And he said "circuit breaking. Didn't happen though" then the interviewer clarifies and he's like "oh damn, I'm old. Ok here's the answer"
@@hibiscustea13 wrong he said circuit breaker after the point he made about it never happening therefore circuit breaker is clearly a code word to shut up or there are consequences
@@Gottigmc Wow, and you think _he_ has problems with basic English. It's perfectly clear that he's talking about the time a circuit breaker broke, he _even tells the story afterwards_ , but, being a Moon Hoaxer, you probably heard the phrase 'didn't happen' and started masturbating furiously....
@@DeadEyeJedi he does have a problem he can’t remember to keep his mouth closed with certain things cus he’s to damn old you imbecile, also your weird asfk what kinda statement is that..💀
@@Gottigmc He was asked a question and he answered it, clearly and with a conclusion to the situation stated at the end of the story of how they were concerned the circuit breaker would not work but everything turned out ok. He was asked what was scary, he said that fear 'didn't happen'. I'll just say, these men were test-pilots they know fear will kill you faster than anything else, they are trained to ignore it. Someone reminded him of a situation with a circuit breaker that could have caused a scary situation, and he told that story. If you had watched the WHOLE video, you would know this, but you didn't. Probably because you were busy masturbating over the fact he said 'it didn't happen' and were too happy _assuming_ what it meant, rather than listening to the story and _understanding_ what it meant.
It’s simple. They pushed the big red button, and they flew to the moon. To take off he pushed on the circuit breaker with a felt-tipped pen. And that’s it! It’s easy
LDNROAMER he was LMP lunar module pilot. The commander Armstrong was actually the pilot. The LMP was in charge of all LM systems, comms, radar, guidance computer etc. LMP’s eyes were inside the ship CMR eyes were outside.
Aldrin was the lunar module pilot!!! Michael Collins was the command module pilot, and Neil Armstrong was THE commander. Armstrong took manual control of the LM though. Aldrin gave Armstrong altitude & other info.
@@Box545x39 no not really it’s more the belief that people put how it all worked-6 missions with no failures comical! The more it goes on the More people are easily fooled with the lie- the first “landing” was done in a hangar in cannon air force base! It’s a strange thing with people who keep on the same theme of they not we went to the moon! And a coke bottle seen on the landing site and reported in the Australian press didn’t really get to the believers-! The only possible way they made it was with another technology as von Braun said!
Sitting behind the Second man ever to walk on the moon, part of the first team to make it to the moon.one of the greatest accomplishments in human history... Meanwhile Girl@ 9:17 ;Students will be students lol
The best bit, student, "what was the scariest moment of the journey" Buzz "Scariest........It didn't happen, it could of been scary" then he was prompted to say the circuit breaker and the pen, another little nugget of truth from Buzz......watch from 30min 15 secs.
Yes, it was true he wasn't scared when he was on the Moon, he was a test pilot, and panic doesn't help in a bad situation as they well know. And yes, the circuit breaker story was an interesting one that could, indeed, have been scary if the engines had not worked at launch. Thanks for the help confirming the truth of the Moon Landings, that they happened and that Buzz Aldrin was one of the crew.
Yeah he's said it didnt happen or they didnt go more than once. Did in a previous interview. Good for those who pay attention. Notice he gets 'guided' back on to the official line.
@@RobGordon35 That's the story you are inventing, but you have to edit out bits of reality for that to work, don't you? Like the rest of the conversation...
The disney lemaitre copernicus freemasonic luciferian hollywood sci-fi psy-op DECEPTION known as ‘outerspace’ is brainwashed, indoctrinated and deliberately propagated with an intricately detailed narrative to HIDE and DENY the existence of YHWH's Heavenly Kingdom and His Son Yahushua The Messiah above us ✝️ 🤦🏽♂️😭 🙌🏽 👼🏽 ruclips.net/video/7nFwPDZF_Z8/видео.html ruclips.net/video/UbYtkrTquXE/видео.html ruclips.net/video/AeIGrEtPMmE/видео.html
Oh, people who believe in space and the fact that we went to the moon are some of the most obtuse individuals you’re ever going to meet. These are people who go to magic shows and our mystified
Many of the heroes we celebrate we never know. How extraordinary would it be if we could have a conversation with one. We can. We did. You should listen.
none of it is real, you are a perfect example of the outcome wanted by nasa. you still call them heroes? man i wonder how much shady evil stuff the government has to get caught for, for someone like you to stop calling any of them heroes...THEY ARE VILLAINS, they lie, manipulate and cheat. ALL EVIDENCE BACKS THAT UP
According to the comments here, what you should do when meeting a great man is go to his face and be like "Hurr Durr, Itweas fAkE! I know better, whatched a youtube video abouyt iT!"
@@1SevenCirclesDesign that’s the problem you mistake a great man for a great actor is all. I’m definitely not that rude but this deserves light, tired of the lies man straight up
@@agelessone You do know that every nation in the world can use the equipment laid out on the moon to make ranging tests and other experiments? You can even go to any museum or planetarium and do some experiments yourself. But sure, just call them actors or whatever, you dont deserve to meet people who have made such accomplishments. In fact, dont ever talk to anyone in navigation or telecommunications. Your brainpower doesnt deserve it. And if your belief extends to space exploration in general, I would even go as far as saying you dont deserve anything involving satellite technology.
Up to 21:57 Buzz is entertaining. At 21:58 he ventures into the realm of lunacy to suggest such a thing. At 1:04:15 are they all clapping because he is finished speaking, or were they truly entertained and enlightened? Why no one asked him about the strange things he observed in space is a disappointment. He, like many fellow astronauts, are on record as having observed strange, unexplained, unknown flying objects in space and it'd have been interesting to ask him about these incidents
@@AaronEddieHYo So, you don’t believe “space” exists. Why? Because you think the Biblewriters knew what they were talking about? Well, if you want to live in a snow globe, you are welcome
@@horrorfactory770 What does You think? Why would the superstisious Greek, medieval astronomers and even modern scientists invent a ”space” if it didn’t exist? Is it Because The Bible doesn’t talk about it You Ask??? Hilarious… What’s YOUR proof it doesn’t exist???
It was a perfect response.. its truth in plain sight for the intelligent to pick up on, but it also serves as a normal answer for the sleepers.. it can be interpreted both ways. The real answer is that he's saying we never went in the first place, but it can also be interpreted as him saying that scary moment never happened. It was indeed a clever response that hits both sides. He's ambiguous for a reason because he's hiding something. Its his way of vindicating himself and trying to rinse the guilt away while not being too obvious about it as that would get him in trouble and would more than likely cost him his life.
This was a disaster. He didn't hear the questions. Then took for ever to get to the point while answering a question. Then the students asked the dumbest questions. Then the interviewer spoke to low when trying to relate a question to him. These students had a golden opportunity to ask stuff like..... how far away from the module did you walk. 2. at any point while walking on the moon did you feel like you would float off the ground. 3. how did it feel when you left the Earth's orbit and entered the moon's orbit. Stuff like that.
Buzz probably didn't think he would get so much skepticism from people upon his return from the moon. That was surprising I'm sure. Over the years he has learned to take it in stride. People being what they are, there was going to be envy, jealousy, and the like. I personally hang on his every word. How could you not? The first to land on the moon. Pretty much doing the impossible. He's been paid well over the year's for telling what it was like. But you have to give him credit. The mission filled us all with wonder and awe. He knew we wanted to hear about it. He felt a responsibility to share it with us being that he had a front row seat. Thats quite a burden to carry for an entire lifetime. We should all be grateful.
*???* Where is any evidence of skepticism on Return? Unaware even if no generally believed, even some doubted Russians up there. Very strange: on all first Press Conferences uploads, no one no one no one shows signs of hanging on.... Believers whine about skeptic comments or give excuses.
From Van Allen himself!! "Van Allen calculated that it was possible to fly through the weaker regions of radiation to reach outer space. In 1968, NASA's Apollo Mission 8 was the first crewed spaceship to fly beyond the Van Allen belts to orbit the Moon and then return to Earth."
@@timcarr6401 Another quote from Prof. Van Allen "Dear Mr. Lambert, In reply to your e-mail, I send you the following copy of a response that I wrote to another inquiry about 2 months ago -- Ø The radiation belts of the Earth do, indeed, pose important constraints on the safety of human space flight. Ø The very energetic (tens to hundreds of MeV) protons in the inner radiation belt are the most dangerous and most difficult to shield against. Specifically, prolonged flights (i.e., ones of many months' duration) of humans or other animals in orbits about the Earth must be conducted at altitudes less than about 250 miles in order to avoid significant radiation exposure. Ø A person in the cabin of a space shuttle in a circular equatorial orbit in the most intense region of the inner radiation belt, at an altitude of about 1000 miles, would be subjected to a fatal dosage of radiation in about one week. Ø However, the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage - a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable. Ø The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense. James A. Van Allen"
@@ryseworld if you'd do any research you'd know how that was done, thanks for proving that you conspiracy nuts just parrot the same shit over and over without any research, you're all great sheep
@@armagedon2.067 yo soy la del like a tu comentario, pero me gustaría que me explicaras todo, con pelos y señales, acerca de por qué se dice que nunca fueron a la Luna.
He said there wasn't a scariest part of the journey, not that they didn't go to the moon, he spends entire interview describing his moon landing experience
@@Doone-iq8kx no he did not your just trying to defend him. If thats what he meant the audience would have not laughed and he would have not been asked by the female sitting next to him to return back to the script. Genius.
@@michaelmanero6084 where did you hear "circuit breakers" from?? You are the one with selective hearing. After reading your comment I listened to that part 5 times and never heard any circuit breaker.
I love his videos. One think I wish is that all people who ask questions would notice that he would be more comfy with a pillow or two behind his back.
NASA's own analysis stated it's a 1:10,000 chance a trip to the moon and back would be successful on the first try. So, if we belive Buzz, he is one lucky sob.
Who was operating the camera that saw them take off from the moon? Also how did they know the surface of the moon was safe to land on? there are so many questions that are not just not answered, they don't even get asked.
Gaz Lee You can easily find the answers if you try. The Camera was controlled by Mission Control’ via the rovers transmitter/receiver and parabolic antenna.
I think I can help! The camera was on a stand and operated remotely by someone in mission control. They knew the surface was safe to land on because of the many landers they sent before hand. Hope this helps
If there was so much dust on the moon and it was all over their space suits....why was it not all over the space craft....especially the landing pads?!
Moon landing deniers are so pathetic. What he meant was the scary part was not to succeed. It was clear as day. God you guys are reaching for the low having fruit.
It's interesting how you added quotation marks, then added your own words. That's the problem with you people, you literally misconstrue so much information just to make it slide into your warped narrative. Go look into the physics, science, and the amount of work it took from hundreds of thousands of people during the Apollo era.
Gosh this video is not a very good advert for higher education in the UK, these people are our future lawyers, judges, doctors, accountants, mps etc and yet, almost 50 years since the 'event', can't muster up any decent questions to ask Aldrin. I thought the object of these discussions was to come away having garnered more information and stimulated by the whole thing? I mean come on "What was the silliest thing you did on the moon?" What the f**k? What a cretin, how does a question like that that further any kind of serious discussion?
I forget what the original question asked was, by the time buzz finishes his answers. But who cares!? When the second man to ever walk on the moon is speaking; you listen.
Those men are extremely intelligent and were trying to explain complicated matters. I understand why it’s hard to believe, it took a series of miracles, hard work, extreme intelligence, and collective teamwork. It’s no small task to undertake, but I firmly believe we went to the moon. I just don’t see why we would fake it when there were many other ways we could have proven our superiority. As I am writing this comment, Artemis 1 is currently orbiting the moon, testing and paving the way for the next series of moon missions, set to establish a permanent presence on the moon and eventually to Mars.
@@neilarmstrongsson795 Yes, the vibe around that press conference was incredibly strange - there was no sense of joy or elation from any of them. They all seemed very anxious and nervous - not at all what you would expect after achieving successfully the most amazing feat in human history. I suppose the million dollar question is this: someone puts a gun to your head and offers you a million dollars if you get the question right - if you get it wrong it’s hasta la vista baby! Here’s the question - did Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin LAND on the moon in 1969? So do you take the bet people and what’s your answer????
I just imagine what it must be or must had been like to have the constant reminder, to see the moon in the sky and to know that, "I am one of the few people to have actually been there."
Yes, the whole thing had been planned out and so when they asked him what was the scariest part, his reply was 'it didn't happen', in other words, he didn't get scared because he had rehearsed it so often. Why do people think that taking a 2 second statement completely out of context proves _anything_ ? Talk about twisting other people's words....
It didn't happen. Everyone knows it and the next psy-op will be fake aliens " project bluebeam " right before the entire CIA run pedophile ring and WWIII starts. Y'all ain't slick.
Question : "Why has no one gone to the moon in such a long time?" Answer by Buzz : "That's my question. I want to know. But I think I know. Because we didn't go there and that's why it happened. And if it didn't happen --it's nice to know why it didn't happen."
why did you leave out the part where he said money was ultimately the reason why we stopped going after completing our mission? He was obviously talking about why we didnt go back after Apollo 17, which is what the girl was asking about.
@@rowdyyates4273 these people are so deeply programmed, they hear him flat out say "it didn't happen" and continue along in their zombie like state. Scary stuff
My grandfather saw the landing on television live, and I remember him telling me that there was a Coca Cola can on the ground of the moon. He then told me that the very next replay of the landing showed the exact same thing WITHOUT the soda can I looked into this and found others saw this as well
We are so lucky to be able to still listen to the surviving apollo astronauts. They have flown faster and further then anyone else. Going back to the moon is a backward step that we have already achieved. We have the technology but not the brains to have been to Mars already. NASA in the 60s was at it's best.
Was it easy walking around in temperatures of 220 F during the day and not freezing to death when you walked in the shade where it was -220 F ? How powerful were those portable air conditioners that reverted from heating the space suit to cooling it.
what power source they used to maintain everything? this was 100% hoax, they never send humans anywhere they do not send animals first. THE entire thing is a fraud, people are stupid to believe this crap. ALL the missions not one time they show the earth from the moon, can you imagine the view?? they riding the buggy etc not ever showing the earth
what part of "the lunar day is a month long" is so hard for you morons to grasp? what part of "only the actual surface reaches those temperatures, with a fucking vacuum above it that does not convect heat" is so fucking hard for you utter dimwits to understand?
Yes, the whole thing had been planned out and so when they asked him what was the scariest part, his reply was 'it didn't happen', in other words, he didn't get scared because he had rehearsed it so often. Why do people think that taking a 2 second statement completely out of context proves _anything_ ? Talk about twisting other people's words....
@@kane9996 And once again, you are selecting a _single phrase_ from an entire video and trying to misdirect people into thinking it was in a different context to the way it was _actually worded_ . For example, in the video you keep lauding regarding an interview between Buzz Aldrin and a young girl named Zoey, the bit that is avoided is the question leading up to what he said, Zoey asked Buzz "why didn't we go back to the Moon?", Buzz's reply was "that's the thing, we _didn't go_" and he was talking about how much of a pity it was that we never returned to the Moon after the Apollo series. People like you try to twist a few moments from an entire interview in your favour without _ever_ bothering to look at the whole of said interview. It's blindingly obvious he is talking about the fact that we _didn't go back to the Moon_ . A child could understand that, you, apparently, cannot.
Hes accidentally said it plenty of times....hell he once literally told a 7 year old girl when asked why we haven't gone back to the moon" quote " because we didn't go there" then his next attempted 4 recovery expansions answers right after only dug the hole deeper.....but oh those tin foil hattys...I almost feel sorry for people who unconditionally believe all of this nonsense, but then I realize thats not fair cause were all duped about crap in one way or another and I got my own issues to work on.....its still amazing the unconditional trust most have in these nonsense narratives though. I mean were talking thousands of contradictions when one even just does an hour of research...thousands! from there own words even over the years....
I don't know whether Buzz was having an off day, maybe feeling his age or was loaded but this was terrible. He was very sporadic, his thoughts were all over the place, very incoherent.
Buzz has never (publicly) entertained the philosophical notions of his moon landing. What was the biggest impact of the first moon landing? The development of an industry capable of strategic missile defense. What were his initial thoughts upon exiting the lander? "I had a job to do." Is landing on the moon again with more advanced technology a good idea? What's more important is stimulating public interest and then funding for a clearly defined objective. He actually answers every question, though it sometimes seems like he doesn't. My absolute favorite moment in NASA history was when he punched that guy in the face for calling him a liar and a fraud. The young audience is looking for sound bites and he just won't give it.
yeah? "It didn't happen" is a pretty good sound bite at minute 30. Makes sense since going to the moon would've violated the second law of thermodynamics.
@@doraanaisnin5199 no one’s ever gone. We don’t even know what the moon is and space is a second law of thermodynamics violation; it cannot exist as we were told.
Este hombre es un gran mentiroso. Que explique como se pudo pasar el cinturón de asteroides de Van Halen que tienen más de 3.000 grados de temperatura.
@@edgardoaltmann8619 But have you really looked into it? You obviously have swallowed the official narrative, but have you listened to the other side? If not I think you should consider. What's there to lose? Bart Sibrel, Richard D Hall two guys I know of that can break it down pretty good imo- I dare you to have a look at what they have to say. If you don't even bother, you just choose to keep your mind closed, well you are like the definition of a sheep and I think you should think twice before you call people disgusting. With all due respect.
ok, thats better, im argie and live in patagonia. so you say moonlandings are fake. kubrick film all in nevada. its so stupid i simply no time to loose talking with flatearthners. have a good day and get a brain.
There was a camera on the leg of the Lander pointing towards the ladder for the exact purpose of filming the first steps. This can easily be looked up.
At 30:16 a nice freudian slip there Mr Buzz. Lady in the second row: "What was the scariest moment of the journey?" Buzz: "Scariest? It didn't happen, it could've been scary..."
I think he was talking about the circuit breaker problem, if it weren’t attended to or he missed it then they wouldn’t have gotten home. He wasn’t saying the moon landing didn’t happen, he was saying the scariest bit didn’t happen but if it did it could have been scary. He’s really old here and trying to compound all these memories. You can tell that he speaks long form sentences, he wasn’t finished talking about the circuit breaker until someone else was asking a question. So it’s not really fair to treat his responses as someone youthful in a sense.
@@16alphav You mean those that look for any little slip up or any opportunity to take something said out of context as to only back up their on ignorant silly belief that it’s all a hoax while completely dismissing the tons of factual hard evidence that it did indeed happen. Literally every single thing you deniers come up with have been debunked over and over yet derpity derp derp it’s still all a hoax. By chance are you a flat Earther too ? 🙄
"The rock box were heavy..." ... ehhh, on the Moon??? He talks about getting the samples up the latter and then the lift off.. It would not be heavy on the Moon...
Just so you firmly understand what his point was. The spacesuit he wore was almost 200 pounds, and it had quite limited movement. He had nearly 50 pounds of lunar material in the box. The LM's ladder is nearly vertical. Can you connect those dots? Even though weight is 1/6th on the moon compared to Earth, that doesn't make it 6x easier. Stop looking at things blindly and just objectively think for once.
@@langleybeliever7789 What good would that have done? Sibrel simply accused the person of blasphemy for lying on the bible. All of the astronauts knew that. So when Sibrel got him to a hotel for an interview based on false pretenses, Aldrin simply refused. Instead of backing off, Sibrel kept harassing and ultimately cornered him. So Aldrin decked him.
He is saying the scariest thing about the whole mission is the circuit breaker. It’s the heart of the craft and breakage spells doom. He is saying something .
@@Dr.sasofficial No he did not. There was no circuit breaker mentioned. After he said it never happened and everybody laughed and after asked by the female next to him to return to the script he started mentioning the circuit thing
@@Dr.sasofficial question was "what was the most scary moment of the journey" and his response was crystal clear "it never happened it could have been scary you with me there...hmmm?" There no circuit breaker mentioned stop being foolish
Your explanation was very brief Mr Aldrin ! We need your advice & support in order to get more informations to enhance our knowledge about space exploration !
@@RealidadeDaTerra - for the space exploration to act all the relevant operations & processes in Hollywood thence all relevant features concerned would be depicted there !
@@dylansalazar1226 - the information related to the space exploration as briefs by Mr Buzz Aldrin was important didn’t matter whether he reached or didn’t reach the moon !
@terryhill4732 you don’t understand how president Nixon could talk to the astronauts on Moon via a landline telephone??? Very simple, they just connected his phone to the radio transmitters they used to talk to the astronauts. Just as simple as that, you should try to learn some very basic communications technology.
@@YDDES Sorry young blood but there's alot of places on earth a cell phone won't pick up and saying it was done decades before Apollo is asinine no space program even existed decades before the 1960's, learn something before you commt
zulkifli md hussain He’s said balance. You weigh much less than on Earth but the 360 lbs backpack still has equal momentum which would carry on it’s kinetic motion whichever way you were traveling. He said it was like moving with an elephant on your back, lighter but changing direction was difficult. Thats why on all the vids they do that weird shuffle.
The disney lemaitre copernicus freemasonic luciferian hollywood sci-fi psy-op DECEPTION known as ‘outerspace’ is brainwashed, indoctrinated and deliberately propagated with an intricately detailed narrative to HIDE and DENY the existence of YHWH's Heavenly Kingdom and His Son Yahushua The Messiah above us ✝️ 🤦🏽♂️😭 🙌🏽 👼🏽 ruclips.net/video/7nFwPDZF_Z8/видео.html ruclips.net/video/UbYtkrTquXE/видео.html ruclips.net/video/AeIGrEtPMmE/видео.html
@@alwaysabondgirl1301 - as the gravity on the moon was 1/6 as of the Earth’s 😠how would you define the actual feelings of walking. on the moon & on the Earth ?
5:56 Wait, he wouldn't have gone if it was a one way trip? There must have been a major risk that the moon landing could have turned into a one-way trip and something the astronauts was prepared for?
Yes, it was possible, but as NASA said, despite rumours to the contrary, they did not give astronauts suicide pills, because they would NEVER give up with trying to get them home.
@@jojo-fu4xh - That's true. He was 85 when he did this interview. He's remembering events from 46 years previous. I couldn't tell you much about what I was doing 46 years ago.
Great to see buzz in context, not snippets. Don't skip, watch the entire video, he shares some serious and some jokes. All round, glad i watched to see the truth. He certainly was on the moon and the 1st man to pee on the moon, even tho it stayed in his suit.
@MaudeWhite-yc6ji bs dude, you have no idea about context, meaning and buzzs sarcasm. Get over it, when they go back to the moon next year. You will see what they left behind, such as the flag and reflective mirror, still there as it was.
The disney lemaitre copernicus freemasonic luciferian hollywood sci-fi psy-op DECEPTION known as ‘outerspace’ is brainwashed, indoctrinated and deliberately propagated with an intricately detailed narrative to HIDE and DENY the existence of YHWH's Heavenly Kingdom and His Son Yahushua The Messiah above us ✝️ 🤦🏽♂️😭 🙌🏽 👼🏽 ruclips.net/video/7nFwPDZF_Z8/видео.html ruclips.net/video/UbYtkrTquXE/видео.html ruclips.net/video/AeIGrEtPMmE/видео.html
Yes, the whole thing had been planned out and so when they asked him what was the scariest part, his reply was 'it didn't happen', in other words, he didn't get scared because he had rehearsed it so often. Why do people think that taking a 2 second statement completely out of context proves _anything_ ? Talk about twisting other people's words....
@@DeadEyeJedi Find the other interview of Buzz telling a little girl that he didn't go to space. Nasa made space up to hide God from us. The earth is a flat plane protected by a dome. The heavens are above the dome. The moon is made out of plasma and you can't land on it. Space is fake. And the biggest money laundering that exists. Satanists rule this place. God tells us in the Bible over 200 times the form and shape of the earth. A rainbow is the reflexion of the dome. The whole thing is a lie. What happened to the moonlight when they landed on it. lol.
@@c.5315 In the interview between Zoey and Buzz, she asked why we didn't go back to the back to the Moon, Buzz's reply was mourning the fact that if we had kept going back to the Moon we could have achieved a lot, "but we didn't go." Try watching the whole interview rather than a heavily edited snippet before you start talking rubbish. Edit: Posted because it seems this person cannot understand plain English.
I was hoping that he was going to tell the complete truth about everything. But we all know that it's impossible to travel to the moon, land on it, and survive. I say that because of the nuclear issues that happened in Japan, nobody had any equipment to protect them from the nuclear effects of that, but had the protection from levels of gamma rays, and the different levels of radiation that would kill humans, but didn't have the same PPE???? It's just not adding up
The Soviet space program sent two Tortoises to the moon and back in 1968 before the US landed on the moon. They were healthy on return, and were dissected several months later.
He punched him because he had called him a liar and a coward to his face. The guy had it coming. Aldrin put his life on the line for his country more than once. Why should he let some punk stalker insult him with impunity? I’ve read that the punk tried to sue Aldrin but the judge laughed and threw it out.
On September 9, 2002, Aldrin was accosted by conspiracy theorist Bart Sibrel and a film crew outside a Beverly Hills hotel he was lured to on the pretext of being interviewed for a Japanese children’s TV show. Sibrel cornered Buzz Aldrin in Beverly Hills and badgered him about whether the moon landing and his lunar walk was fake. “You’re the one who said you walked on the Moon when you didn’t,” Sibrel says. Sibrel even shoved the Bible in Aldrin's face a couple of times, asking him to swear on the book. And if that wasn't enough, he went on to call Aldrin “a coward, and a liar, and a thief.”
You came here for 30:11 I know you did because I did too, think for yourselves and question
What's to question? Asked about scariest moment and his answer either meant there were no scary moments or the scariest moment was thinking they may not get to go. If you trained for years to go, only to have it called off would be a scary thought
What I question is your ability to understand his meaning.
I love how he didn’t even talk about the circuit breaker after either. Just about the “box of rocks” we know who he was referring to 😂
Sounds somewhat like a studio practice they did. But they were afraid of cameras & reporters at post conference.
@@wildboar7473 like a topic list of things to talk about if the convo went off track. Or if the interviewee said something out of pocket lol.
30:15 does no one think this is weird? Is no one going to talk about this.
did not happen as in nothing scary happened as he trained for years in preparation for every possible situation. he could barely hear the questions being asked as well
Because it's not weird, it's him saying that they'd trained so hard for so many eventualities that fear wasn't part of the equation. They were test pilots, they already knew fear would kill them faster than most malfunctions.
@@tonykunkerino4087
As I said, they were test pilots, they knew that the minute they started feeling fear, it could lead to panic, and panic achieves nothing. Like pilots who will, despite being terrified, continue reporting for the black-box as a plane is crashing in the hope the information will prove useful, that rule applies _twice_ as hard as test pilots, test pilots are literally chosen on their ability to not panic or get scared in tense situations, that's actually part of the requirements for _being_ a test pilot in the first place.
So, yes, it's perfectly normal for Buzz Aldrin to say that 'being scared' didn't happen, that's why he was chosen to go.
And I see that good old 'I don't care whether we landed on the Moon but [insert textbook Moon Hoaxer argument here]' is raising its head again. Yes, strangely enough, technology developed in 1969 is out of date and not much use, in fact, our computing and heat-resistance technology is decades ahead of Apollo, because it's been decades since Apollo and we learned a lot from the technology, but there was no point hanging on to the manufacturing facilities for stuff that was out of date.
@@tonykunkerino4087
Your initial mistake is assigning the name 'handler' to the person with Buzz Aldrin, it already shows that you have assumed what their role is based on your bias.
Secondly, they asked if he was scared, not if he felt 'fear', there is a difference between the two. He wasn't scared, even when he felt the adrenaline of fear, for the third time that was one of the criteria he had to meet in order to qualify for the astronaut program. He even at the end of his explanation says that, had the engines not fired it _could_ have been scary, but the situation never arose, so he wasn't scared, why worry about what _didn't_ happen?
The comment you are referring to wasn't said by 'one of the heads of NASA', it was by Don Petit, an astronaut, and, once again, he is correct, until recently we did not have the equipment to return to the Moon with people, the original Apollo missions were about reaching the moon, there wasn't much interest in doing anything else until we recently started developing technology that could possibly make use of the Moon's resources, now the Artemis program etc. is looking at going back.
I'm sorry to hear that me daring to respond to your accusations of me being a troll is so horribly inconvenient for you, I'm sure you'd much prefer it if people didn't defend themselves...
@@tonykunkerino4087
And you claimed that fear _had_ to be part of the equation, which is doesn't, that's what the training is for, to remove fear from the equation so you can do your job. I paraphrased what was said, stuff happened that could have been scary, but it didn't happen, everything worked at they took off just fine.
And thanks for proving my point.
So at 30:17 a lady asks what was the scariest part about going, Buzz says "It didn't happen", but the more telling thing is that Buzz has a handler in case he messes up. So if we did go to the moon, and Buzz is telling the truth, why is there someone there to catch his mistakes?
The answer is simple your a fool
Yes, the whole thing had been planned out and so when they asked him what was the scariest part, his reply was 'it didn't happen', in other words, he didn't get scared because he had rehearsed it so often.
Why do people think that taking a 2 second statement completely out of context proves _anything_ ? Talk about twisting other people's words....
@@DeadEyeJedi this isn’t the first time he’s admitted it in a tongue and cheek way. He’s got a habit of doing it.
@@thegoodshepherd7777
Not really, it's more a case of Hoaxers taking ONE sentence out of an entire conversation and then presenting it in a way that looks incriminating. It's not at all that he's 'admitted it', in fact, he punched Bart Sibrel in the face for calling him a liar, which was well deserved.
It's like when he had an interview with a little girl, the Moon Hoaxers showed an edited version of the interview in order to change the context of what he said and tried to claim he had 'admitted' then as well when he was clearly saying that we didn't go _back_ to the Moon after the Apollo missions.
@@thegoodshepherd7777
Liar
ruclips.net/video/KpuKu3F0BvY/видео.html&feature=share&si=ELPmzJkDCLju2KnD5oyZMQ
And can Oxford please ensure that there are no idiots sitting behind legends such as this? This is not the first video I've watched of yours where children get to diminish a great talk in the background. Disgusting behaviour.... 9:17
That is disgusting. I don’t understand why they have anyone siting behind him.
Guy, we never went to the moon. It was a hoax. You seem like a smart person, you don't see the deception?
@@trendynow1369 So boring. There are many other things you could blow peoples minds with.
@@trendynow1369
You never went to the moon.
@@mballer no one has ever been to the moon and they never will. It's been 60 years since they tried lying and told us they went. Even those who believe nasa must think that's suspect, not to mention all the cgi pictures of earth
Question: What was the scariest moment of the journey(To the Moon)? Answer: "Scariest?... It didn't happen... It could have been scary..."~Buzz Aldrin 2015 Q and A session, Oxford Union
First off - - Buzz never answered this to any question
Second - - even if he did, apparently to you idiots, he is a valid source when he says something that fits your world view, and a liar when he contradicts it. This is the sign of an idiot; nothing more.
In case you didn't understand, I'm calling you an idiot.
@@willoughbykrenzteinburgWhen people contradict themselves it means we cam dismiss their claims, and I do.
@dharmaqueen7877 You are providing an example of the very thing I am talking about. If you want to dismiss his claims, that's great. That's not what uou are doing. You are dismissing his claims which contradict the narrative you choose to accept, and accepting the claims which are in line. If you were consistent, you'd dismiss this claim as you interpret it just the same. But you don't. The quality of the source has nothing to do with the source; only the claim. It's a worthless methodology. You're also vastly misunderstanding his quote, but context clearly isn't important to you.
If Buzz had first claimed that he never landed on the moon, and THEN claimed he did, you wouldn't dismiss the original claim. His words have nothing to do with what you choose to accept. You're just cherry picking anything that conforms to your world view and dismissing everything else. It's just the standard modus operandi for people like you. Nothing new here....
@@willoughbykrenzteinburg You are making a lot of assumptions about me based only on my disbelief. There are lots of things I don't believe because I am under no obligation to practice faith and I don't find the evidence on offer very compelling.
What the entire answer ya muppet @@dharmaqueen7877
First question from the audience: How did you feel when you landed on the moon and looked back at the Earth. No answer. Instead he talked about his wives. WTF. Zero technical discussion about getting through the thermosphere. Zero discussion about how the moon feels when you walk on it. "The moon dust might be poisonous" he said ie we still don't know whether it is or not ? So zero tests have been done on the dust/rock that they bought back ? What was the scariest moment of the journey ? Answer: It wasn't scary. Circuit breakers and the ladder were the top topic for some bizarre reason along with swimming, pole-vaulting and meals he had with presidents. Should we go back to the moon with better technology? After no answer and rambling on he blamed the budget. Anyone who had been to the moon would have said yes we should go back immediately. Constantly trying to be funny instead of discussing the most amazing feat of mankind. If someone went to the moon they would actually talk about it rather than rambling on about absolute rubbish. If (big if) we went to the moon he did zero to prove it. Their first interview in 1969 after their return was also absolutely bizarre. Cheers Buzz we know everything about going to the moon now. Lol.
Good contribution and summary. Nothing really said from him, like a politician about the bush. If I had been on the moon, wow incredible feelings of being proud and overwhelmed about the extraordinairy experiences. But what is: He talks like he has been on a stage with grey dust in a studio with backdrops in the background making a video of 2,5 Hours lenght. And they were in the orbit of the earth for a few days, that is the feat. They have no idea about what the universe, the moon, the planets and stars really means, particulary Buzz Aldrin seems to be totally unaware and clueless about these subjects, he has no relation regarding these topics, like an ignorant.
"the fact that the Apollo astronauts. DID NOT NEED TO KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE VABS." barks a 20+ years veteran for debunking "no evidences" hoax.
Maybe he has some type of brain damage and / or mental disorder ? I’m 10 min in and it feels like he’s disconnected from the questions and just mumbling disconnected streams of thought . I’ve heard mentally ill junkies who talk exactly like that with the uncomfortably long pauses , almost talking to themselves , going on tangents related to their personal experiences that have nothing to do with what’s being talked about etc.
He answered that in other questions, but...you didn't watch the entire video. Typical
Buzz is called "Buzz" for a reason!
He’s called buzz because his sibling named him buzzer instead of brother...then everybody named him buzz and he changed his name
The disney lemaitre copernicus freemasonic luciferian hollywood sci-fi psy-op DECEPTION known as ‘outerspace’ is brainwashed, indoctrinated and deliberately propagated with an intricately detailed narrative to HIDE and DENY the existence of YHWH's Heavenly Kingdom and His Son Yahushua The Messiah above us ✝️ 🤦🏽♂️😭 🙌🏽 👼🏽
ruclips.net/video/7nFwPDZF_Z8/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/UbYtkrTquXE/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/AeIGrEtPMmE/видео.html
@@rafaelmakonen9546 idiot..
@@rafaelmakonen9546 oh brother
@Kris Waters right. No one can leave earth. Space isnt real
Met the man last night at the Cradle of Aviation museum. He signed a copy of his children's book for my daughter, and I'd love nothing more for her to get into a field related to space travel. Astrophysics, theoretical physics, engineering, etc.
I drove 6 hours for her yesterday, 6 hours home today!
You're an inspiration, Buzz! Or shall I say... Dr. Rendezvous!
+Joshua Maine I envy you, Buzz Aldrin, Neil Armstrong and Michael Collins are true heroes of humanity.
No need to envy me, Batman. You're the one with all the cool gizmos and money...
Joshua Maine Maybe, but you shook hands with a *real* Hero.
30:16 "it never happened. It couldn't have been scary"
If any of you actually think they landed on the moon......just watch Neil arrmstrongs 25 year anniversary speech. Its about 10 min long
30:07 I time stamped the lady's question.
So here's what you should do when listening to this. Use your brains and ears (whether you're brainwashed or have selective hearing or not) and stop taking things out of context.
Put 2 & 2 together. It's not rocket science quite literally at this point. It's common sense and the way you comprehend the question and answer given.
The lady asked, "what was the *_scariest moment_* of the journey?"
Aldrin replied, "It didn't happen."
Now let me translate for those who may be a little slow.
*_What was it that didn't happen in the journey?_*
He said the *_"scariest moment"_* of the journey didn't happen, when he said, "it didn't happen."
Clearly there is an entire 1:04:57 of this Q&A between Aldrin and the interviewers in the audience who have asked dozens of questions. And yall chose to take this question and answer entirely out of context because ppl like making things up, misconstruing, and misinterpreting things so that they seem like lies. You're essentially creating a delusional hypothesis rather than actually listening and gaining cold hard facts.
If she were to ask the question differently and received the same answer, yall would still make these false claims that he had denied that the moon landing ever happened.
I can't understand it for you so don't get upset when I say, "I told you so", after you dig deeper into his answer. There's so much more evidence that the moon landing happened than there is evidence that it didn't happen.
Just do your research, stop taking things out of context and actually listen and use your ears.
There are many, many other events similar to this that ppl are taking out of context and running with it as an, "oh, here's the proof, you heard it from the horses mouth, this or that did or didn't happen."
It shouldn't come to a point where people, like me, have to point out the obvious.
Edited for spelling.
Cool analysis - you sound rather boostered tho
@@Whacky1984 Boostered? My analysis was logical while many have made illogical assumptions rather than actually listening to what is being said.
@@pencilsniper sorry darling, he said it didn't happen as in the journey didnt happen. He's admitted many times. Watch the footage of the moon landing and everything else. It's tacky 1960s/1970s star wars effects.
@@1schlom It did happen. It impossible to actually fake a moon landing because they would need a very very VERY large area and a very very very large green screen the size of Texas. People are so delusion about this and believe what they want to believe, she asked about the scariest part of the journey. He said the scariest part never happened. Don't use the illogical standpoint because it doesn't make sense and it makes you sound crazy. And also, if it didn't happen, why is it when I zoom in with a telescope, I can see the American flag on the moon? It happened.
Looks like man has only been in low earth orbit. Space travel is science fiction.
I saw him in the Gemini program when I was a teenager. He is a treasure. Thank you for this interview. He gets a lot of bad press from idiots who dont have a clue of all the facts and context. Its October 2024 and I just found this. Muchas Gracias, Vaya con Dios
Aldrin went through severe depression after the moon mission and also struggled with alcohol for years. I'm so glad he's been able to come out of this valley stronger and apparently at lot wiser. He is giving a lot to humanity
Yup he knew he was a fraud and not the hero he was pretending to be.
@@firstlast2386 he is not a fraud. And the term hero is overrated anyway…
@@bastian6173 True. He is a liar, an actor and thief of tax dollars. Also incredibly violent as he assaults tax payers for asking him honest questions.
He never went to jail because of his masonic ties.
Ya it must be hard to be a world famous liar.😂
All 3 were depressed. They were under duress not to tell a word of the truth.
30:17 he admits for the 3rd such time known footage wise that it didn't happen. 3 different times, 3 different people, same question...3 times the same answer--IT DIDN'T HAPPEN.
He answered the question as if he thought she asked the scariest thing that COULD have happened. And he said "circuit breaking. Didn't happen though" then the interviewer clarifies and he's like "oh damn, I'm old. Ok here's the answer"
@@hibiscustea13 wrong he said circuit breaker after the point he made about it never happening therefore circuit breaker is clearly a code word to shut up or there are consequences
@@Gottigmc
Wow, and you think _he_ has problems with basic English. It's perfectly clear that he's talking about the time a circuit breaker broke, he _even tells the story afterwards_ , but, being a Moon Hoaxer, you probably heard the phrase 'didn't happen' and started masturbating furiously....
@@DeadEyeJedi he does have a problem he can’t remember to keep his mouth closed with certain things cus he’s to damn old you imbecile, also your weird asfk what kinda statement is that..💀
@@Gottigmc
He was asked a question and he answered it, clearly and with a conclusion to the situation stated at the end of the story of how they were concerned the circuit breaker would not work but everything turned out ok. He was asked what was scary, he said that fear 'didn't happen'. I'll just say, these men were test-pilots they know fear will kill you faster than anything else, they are trained to ignore it.
Someone reminded him of a situation with a circuit breaker that could have caused a scary situation, and he told that story.
If you had watched the WHOLE video, you would know this, but you didn't. Probably because you were busy masturbating over the fact he said 'it didn't happen' and were too happy _assuming_ what it meant, rather than listening to the story and _understanding_ what it meant.
The question no one seems to ask is how the spaceship functions, what was his role in controlling the ship?
Everyone knows how spaceships functions. At least, they should know.
It’s simple. They pushed the big red button, and they flew to the moon. To take off he pushed on the circuit breaker with a felt-tipped pen. And that’s it! It’s easy
It’s like flying a kite
LDNROAMER he was LMP lunar module pilot. The commander Armstrong was actually the pilot. The LMP was in charge of all LM systems, comms, radar, guidance computer etc. LMP’s eyes were inside the ship CMR eyes were outside.
Aldrin was the lunar module pilot!!! Michael Collins was the command module pilot, and Neil Armstrong was THE commander. Armstrong took manual control of the LM though. Aldrin gave Armstrong altitude & other info.
It's incredible the engineers back then were far superior to be able to get to the moon and back multiple times.
Ha ha you would not no what a engineer looked like 👍 stop being silly!
@@rowdyyates4273 It was partly sarcasm, but the excuses they make why humans haven't walked on the moon since 1972 are lacking any common sense.
@@Box545x39 no not really it’s more the belief that people put how it all worked-6 missions with no failures comical! The more it goes on the More people are easily fooled with the lie- the first “landing” was done in a hangar in cannon air force base! It’s a strange thing with people who keep on the same theme of they not we went to the moon! And a coke bottle seen on the landing site and reported in the Australian press didn’t really get to the believers-! The only possible way they made it was with another technology as von Braun said!
@@Box545x39 No. But clearly you are.
@@Box545x39 No they aren’t lacking common sense
Sitting behind the Second man ever to walk on the moon, part of the first team to make it to the moon.one of the greatest accomplishments in human history...
Meanwhile Girl@ 9:17 ;Students will be students lol
the fact that this video only has 38k views and a video of tommy robinson has 2m views is indicative of the absolute state of the world right now.
apples and oranges
Both should be heard Tommy Robinson is right
Indicative of why we didn't go back.
Watching him lie is only interesting to those who do and do not believe the rest of the population simply doesn’t care.
Tommy’s battles have much more to do with real life then this.
The best bit, student, "what was the scariest moment of the journey" Buzz "Scariest........It didn't happen, it could of been scary" then he was prompted to say the circuit breaker and the pen, another little nugget of truth from Buzz......watch from 30min 15 secs.
Yes, it was true he wasn't scared when he was on the Moon, he was a test pilot, and panic doesn't help in a bad situation as they well know.
And yes, the circuit breaker story was an interesting one that could, indeed, have been scary if the engines had not worked at launch.
Thanks for the help confirming the truth of the Moon Landings, that they happened and that Buzz Aldrin was one of the crew.
Just like flat earthers all the time: throw ignorant argument, then hide to your mom's basement and never engaging any answers.
Mom must be so proud.
Yeah he's said it didnt happen or they didnt go more than once. Did in a previous interview. Good for those who pay attention. Notice he gets 'guided' back on to the official line.
@@RobGordon35
That's the story you are inventing, but you have to edit out bits of reality for that to work, don't you? Like the rest of the conversation...
Buzz is full of shit and these stupid mongtard sheeple buy it. It’s great entertainment once you know he’s full of shit
I like the part where the interviewer tells the students 'the microphone is going to amplify your voice'
Well they are college students, they need a little help. They’re kind of slow.
The disney lemaitre copernicus freemasonic luciferian hollywood sci-fi psy-op DECEPTION known as ‘outerspace’ is brainwashed, indoctrinated and deliberately propagated with an intricately detailed narrative to HIDE and DENY the existence of YHWH's Heavenly Kingdom and His Son Yahushua The Messiah above us ✝️ 🤦🏽♂️😭 🙌🏽 👼🏽
ruclips.net/video/7nFwPDZF_Z8/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/UbYtkrTquXE/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/AeIGrEtPMmE/видео.html
@@rafaelmakonen9546 that's called delusion.
Oh, people who believe in space and the fact that we went to the moon are some of the most obtuse individuals you’re ever going to meet. These are people who go to magic shows and our mystified
@@h2w25 - Comment written from my internet connected, GPS fed, satellite dependant phone or computer. Way to go
Circuit breaker must be his hypnotic que🤣
Mk ultra for real
Absolutely
@@Level_No_Curve they already told you mk Ultra exist in their masonic Disney movies, the winter soldier 😶
He didn’t even talk about the circuit breaker either. Instead he talked about the “box of rocks”… 🪨 haha 😆 you know who hes talking about
Well shit..
He’s indeed sharp & intelligent with a human touch. He’s humorous.
He deserves our respect.
We r lucky to have him around.
Bless him & family
He’s got none for me, he’s clearly lying and we never went
Yeah hes lying but ill humor everyone and pretend its real. I always thought its a waste of resources
What?
Many of the heroes we celebrate we never know. How extraordinary would it be if we could have a conversation with one. We can. We did. You should listen.
none of it is real, you are a perfect example of the outcome wanted by nasa. you still call them heroes? man i wonder how much shady evil stuff the government has to get caught for, for someone like you to stop calling any of them heroes...THEY ARE VILLAINS, they lie, manipulate and cheat. ALL EVIDENCE BACKS THAT UP
According to the comments here, what you should do when meeting a great man is go to his face and be like "Hurr Durr, Itweas fAkE! I know better, whatched a youtube video abouyt iT!"
@@1SevenCirclesDesign that’s the problem you mistake a great man for a great actor is all. I’m definitely not that rude but this deserves light, tired of the lies man straight up
@@agelessone You do know that every nation in the world can use the equipment laid out on the moon to make ranging tests and other experiments? You can even go to any museum or planetarium and do some experiments yourself. But sure, just call them actors or whatever, you dont deserve to meet people who have made such accomplishments. In fact, dont ever talk to anyone in navigation or telecommunications. Your brainpower doesnt deserve it. And if your belief extends to space exploration in general, I would even go as far as saying you dont deserve anything involving satellite technology.
Thank you BuzZ as a kid our class was cancelled for two days and it was fun adding this human achievement on t.v. Got no commercial!
schools are controlled by the government and have been for a long time.
i really feel bad for the people who believe that NASA are space exhibitionists and not just a mass weapon manufacturing business
Umm, NASA does not manufacture anything. They have contractors that manufacture equipment for them. What weapons do you think NASA is responsible for?
You act as if NA$A was initially comprised of Hitler's top scientists.
I feel bad for people that are scammed into thinking the earth is flat and we didn't go to the moon. It's really sad.
30:18 he turned off
Up to 21:57 Buzz is entertaining. At 21:58 he ventures into the realm of lunacy to suggest such a thing. At 1:04:15 are they all clapping because he is finished speaking, or were they truly entertained and enlightened? Why no one asked him about the strange things he observed in space is a disappointment. He, like many fellow astronauts, are on record as having observed strange, unexplained, unknown flying objects in space and it'd have been interesting to ask him about these incidents
They were probably given a list of things they couldn't ask which if it were me I would have had to ask every question kn that list
He didn't observe anything strange in "space" and he'll never (nobody will) go to a place called space
@@AaronEddieHYo So, you don’t believe “space” exists. Why? Because you think the Biblewriters knew what they were talking about? Well, if you want to live in a snow globe, you are welcome
@@YDDES and you think space is real?? Whats ur proof?
@@horrorfactory770 What does You think? Why would the superstisious Greek, medieval astronomers and even modern scientists invent a ”space” if it didn’t exist?
Is it Because The Bible doesn’t talk about it You Ask??? Hilarious…
What’s YOUR proof it doesn’t exist???
The scariest part of the mission is that it didn’t happen… 30:15
It was a perfect response.. its truth in plain sight for the intelligent to pick up on, but it also serves as a normal answer for the sleepers.. it can be interpreted both ways. The real answer is that he's saying we never went in the first place, but it can also be interpreted as him saying that scary moment never happened. It was indeed a clever response that hits both sides. He's ambiguous for a reason because he's hiding something. Its his way of vindicating himself and trying to rinse the guilt away while not being too obvious about it as that would get him in trouble and would more than likely cost him his life.
Go back to school and learn how speech works
@@BitterSweetUnfolding WAW 226X (G¿S) INPUT. WE KNOW ..::..
@@BitterSweetUnfolding Best response.
This was a disaster. He didn't hear the questions. Then took for ever to get to the point while answering a question. Then the students asked the dumbest questions. Then the interviewer spoke to low when trying to relate a question to him. These students had a golden opportunity to ask stuff like..... how far away from the module did you walk. 2. at any point while walking on the moon did you feel like you would float off the ground. 3. how did it feel when you left the Earth's orbit and entered the moon's orbit. Stuff like that.
Those are dumb questions
Dude. Nobody went to the moon.
Whatever man, your entitled to your opinion and I’ve got mine.
🚀👈☻️👉🦶🇺🇲
@@AaronEddieHYo Well George Santos said it happened. So, it must be true.
Buzz probably didn't think he would get so much skepticism from people upon his return from the moon.
That was surprising I'm sure.
Over the years he has learned to take it in stride.
People being what they are, there was going to be envy, jealousy, and the like.
I personally hang on his every word.
How could you not?
The first to land on the moon.
Pretty much doing the impossible.
He's been paid well over the year's for telling what it was like.
But you have to give him credit.
The mission filled us all with wonder and awe.
He knew we wanted to hear about it.
He felt a responsibility to share it with us being that he had a front row seat.
Thats quite a burden to carry for an entire lifetime.
We should all be grateful.
*???* Where is any evidence of skepticism on Return?
Unaware even if no generally believed, even some doubted Russians up there.
Very strange: on all first Press Conferences uploads, no one no one no one shows signs of hanging on.... Believers whine about skeptic comments or give excuses.
it's funny when he said "land a person on the moon" and then quickly saved his speech by "internationally".
So he was never there?
@@doraanaisnin5199what
From Van Allen himself!!
"Van Allen calculated that it was possible to fly through the weaker regions of radiation to reach outer space. In 1968, NASA's Apollo Mission 8 was the first crewed spaceship to fly beyond the Van Allen belts to orbit the Moon and then return to Earth."
That's quite the fantasy.
@@timcarr6401 😂😂😂😂
@@timcarr6401
Another quote from Prof. Van Allen
"Dear Mr. Lambert,
In reply to your e-mail, I send you the following copy of a response that I wrote to another inquiry about 2 months ago --
Ø The radiation belts of the Earth do, indeed, pose important constraints on the safety of human space flight.
Ø The very energetic (tens to hundreds of MeV) protons in the inner radiation belt are the most dangerous and most difficult to shield against. Specifically, prolonged flights (i.e., ones of many months' duration) of humans or other animals in orbits about the Earth must be conducted at altitudes less than about 250 miles in order to avoid significant radiation exposure.
Ø A person in the cabin of a space shuttle in a circular equatorial orbit in the most intense region of the inner radiation belt, at an altitude of about 1000 miles, would be subjected to a fatal dosage of radiation in about one week.
Ø However, the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage - a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable.
Ø The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense.
James A. Van Allen"
@@timcarr6401 Where did you study outerspace?
@@deni-67 At the Interstellar Institute, class of 1968. :-)
Buzz had a chat up line. 'I was the second man on the moon, Neil before me' worked every time.
That's disgusting. His mother's maiden name was Moon.
@@MichaelKingsfordGray maybe it suits them all liers 👌
and the camera operator who filmed the spectacular landing before neil 🤣 shit is such an obvious lie
@@ryseworld the moon landing is the biggest bullshit show after the covid show!
@@ryseworld if you'd do any research you'd know how that was done, thanks for proving that you conspiracy nuts just parrot the same shit over and over without any research, you're all great sheep
30:15 mark. Watch.
A national treasure. America should be, and I know are, very proud. Such a wonderful spokesman.
Such a bad liar you mean.
Estados Unidos debería estar avergonzado por tener a semejante mentiroso dando conferencias de algo que pasó en un plató de cine.
@@armagedon2.067 yo soy la del like a tu comentario, pero me gustaría que me explicaras todo, con pelos y señales, acerca de por qué se dice que nunca fueron a la Luna.
He said there wasn't a scariest part of the journey, not that they didn't go to the moon, he spends entire interview describing his moon landing experience
He did not say there wasn't a scariest part. His exact words - "Scariest? It didn't happen. It could have been scary."
@@dharmaqueen7877Jesus, he's saying the scariest thing that could of happened didn't
For such a high risk mission (Insurance was crazy) that should carry 90% success rate, even a Neil 50% entails scary phases "to happen".
@@Doone-iq8kx no he did not your just trying to defend him. If thats what he meant the audience would have not laughed and he would have not been asked by the female sitting next to him to return back to the script. Genius.
@@Doone-iq8kx So you think our grandparents sent someone 240,000 miles up and back with their ancient technology?
Ronald Fields
Only some tapes from Apollo 11 are Said to be ”lost”. There were 5 more landnings, with nothing ”lost”.
ruclips.net/video/KpuKu3F0BvY/видео.html&feature=share&si=ELPmzJkDCLju2KnD5oyZMQ
Buzz “it didn’t happen” Aldrin
about the circuit breakers. God selective hearing
@@michaelmanero6084 "we didnt go there, and thats the way it happened"
@@michaelmanero6084 where did you hear "circuit breakers" from?? You are the one with selective hearing. After reading your comment I listened to that part 5 times and never heard any circuit breaker.
I love his videos. One think I wish is that all people who ask questions would notice that he would be more comfy with a pillow or two behind his back.
I need a pillow too, can you give me some?
NASA's own analysis stated it's a 1:10,000 chance a trip to the moon and back would be successful on the first try. So, if we belive Buzz, he is one lucky sob.
Dennis Pfeifer
Therefore they sent Apollo 8 and 10 before 11, without actually landning.
@thePiercingTruth It’s just a matter of falling in a gravitational field. Quite a Piece of Cake. You Will just have to know WHEN to do the maneuvers.
I think Nasa is lying, and tons of people died and the footage we saw was a backup.
Who was operating the camera that saw them take off from the moon? Also how did they know the surface of the moon was safe to land on? there are so many questions that are not just not answered, they don't even get asked.
Gaz Lee
You can easily find the answers if you try. The Camera was controlled by Mission Control’ via the rovers transmitter/receiver and parabolic antenna.
And they had sent unmanned Surveyors There in advance, to test the ground.
@@YDDES Got that from NASA did you?
Gaz Lee Do You have any REAL reasons to doubt What I Said up here or do You just want to discredit NASA?
I think I can help! The camera was on a stand and operated remotely by someone in mission control. They knew the surface was safe to land on because of the many landers they sent before hand. Hope this helps
If there was so much dust on the moon and it was all over their space suits....why was it not all over the space craft....especially the landing pads?!
ps10iceman 2019 and people still believe the conspiracy theories 🙄
Tanya Depoalo
Why would the dust end up on the pads?
Oh, shut up! I didn’t expect you to know anything about it.
YDDES because dust is very fine and gets everywhere really easily.
Ps10iceman
How would the dust go up and land on the pads, when tg
"Scary? Uh what? What was scary? It didn't happen
Oh, uh I mean yeah it did happen, oops sorry"
Cue the handlers!
Moon landing deniers are so pathetic. What he meant was the scary part was not to succeed. It was clear as day. God you guys are reaching for the low having fruit.
I've never seen MK Ultra in use until today. WTF?!
It's interesting how you added quotation marks, then added your own words. That's the problem with you people, you literally misconstrue so much information just to make it slide into your warped narrative. Go look into the physics, science, and the amount of work it took from hundreds of thousands of people during the Apollo era.
16:00 - here come the junior high level questions.
Gosh this video is not a very good advert for higher education in the UK, these people are our future lawyers, judges, doctors, accountants, mps etc and yet, almost 50 years since the 'event', can't muster up any decent questions to ask Aldrin. I thought the object of these discussions was to come away having garnered more information and stimulated by the whole thing?
I mean come on "What was the silliest thing you did on the moon?"
What the f**k? What a cretin, how does a question like that that further any kind of serious discussion?
In all interviews the questions are in general shalow at least. Everytime hard questions came they momble.
Ugh! Agreed!
The entire 50 year episode is meant to be a farce. I theorize more people maintain belief than the jokers ever expected.
Well guess we did learn that Buzz was the first person to take a piss on the moon lol
Liar
ruclips.net/video/KpuKu3F0BvY/видео.html&feature=share&si=ELPmzJkDCLju2KnD5oyZMQ
I forget what the original question asked was, by the time buzz finishes his answers. But who cares!? When the second man to ever walk on the moon is speaking; you listen.
WALKED where 🤔..
Do you have memory lapses often? Easy to rewind & listen to the question to refresh your memory.
Do you dress yourself?
Watch the 'return' press conference, then tell us you still believe it happened.
Those men are extremely intelligent and were trying to explain complicated matters. I understand why it’s hard to believe, it took a series of miracles, hard work, extreme intelligence, and collective teamwork. It’s no small task to undertake, but I firmly believe we went to the moon. I just don’t see why we would fake it when there were many other ways we could have proven our superiority. As I am writing this comment, Artemis 1 is currently orbiting the moon, testing and paving the way for the next series of moon missions, set to establish a permanent presence on the moon and eventually to Mars.
@@neilarmstrongsson795 Yes, the vibe around that press conference was incredibly strange - there was no sense of joy or elation from any of them. They all seemed very anxious and nervous - not at all what you would expect after achieving successfully the most amazing feat in human history.
I suppose the million dollar question is this: someone puts a gun to your head and offers you a million dollars if you get the question right - if you get it wrong it’s hasta la vista baby!
Here’s the question - did Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin LAND on the moon in 1969? So do you take the bet people and what’s your answer????
I just imagine what it must be or must had been like to have the constant reminder, to see the moon in the sky and to know that, "I am one of the few people to have actually been there."
they are on the moon...ruclips.net/video/uz1KLRfxTCc/видео.html
It's amazing how sociopathic liars think putting "truth" in their name lends them any shred of credibility.
Aldrin does these speeches for beer money, he never went there.
@@neilarmstrongsson795 Evidence says no.
@@GuardianSoulkeeper we never went
His LAST answer tells you everything you want to know!!
30:17 it didn't happen
Yes, the whole thing had been planned out and so when they asked him what was the scariest part, his reply was 'it didn't happen', in other words, he didn't get scared because he had rehearsed it so often.
Why do people think that taking a 2 second statement completely out of context proves _anything_ ? Talk about twisting other people's words....
@@DeadEyeJedi you suck as a CIA agent!
It didn't happen. Everyone knows it and the next psy-op will be fake aliens " project bluebeam " right before the entire CIA run pedophile ring and WWIII starts. Y'all ain't slick.
Question : "Why has no one gone to the moon in such a long time?"
Answer by Buzz : "That's my question. I want to know. But I think I know. Because we didn't go there and that's why it happened. And if it didn't happen --it's nice to know why it didn't happen."
Exactly it was all b.s
why did you leave out the part where he said money was ultimately the reason why we stopped going after completing our mission? He was obviously talking about why we didnt go back after Apollo 17, which is what the girl was asking about.
@@jmp4177 he was beating around the bushes. He never directly said they never went there but that was the overall vibe given.
" IT DIDN'T HAPPEN " ... "😮
" circuit break ? * " so WEIRD.
"Circuit breaker in the pan?"
yeah the story goes one was broken for takeoff, used a pen to operate.
Buzz is borderline exposing the government every day. 😂😂
Initially, I thought he was not answering questions from the audience. But, he actually does answer the questions. Very smart man.
Yes a good liar! As he has recently admitted!
@@rowdyyates4273 these people are so deeply programmed, they hear him flat out say "it didn't happen" and continue along in their zombie like state. Scary stuff
@@russbonanno3765 the manipulation of peoples minds is indeed very worrying?
@@DominusTecum0917 30:18
@@DominusTecum091730min, 15sec
30:29 "Circuit Breaker" What's that mean?
why is there a guy and a girl sitting right behind him and then when the camera zooms out they are not behind him. wtg
65philo wierd yes
65philo that’s what we a call camera trick
Love 2 separate camera views. They are to the left of the him
Are you this stupid? They aren’t zooming out dummy, it’s a different camera and angle. This was hard to figure out for you?
T.J. Cunningham don’t be so harsh, he might be an 8 year old or something. You never know.
I would not advise any more public speaking for Buzz, he is not a very good liar.
Paul Methhead, why are you so stupid?
My grandfather saw the landing on television live, and I remember him telling me that there was a Coca Cola can on the ground of the moon. He then told me that the very next replay of the landing showed the exact same thing WITHOUT the soda can
I looked into this and found others saw this as well
🚀👈👀👉🍕🥤
Bullshit.
@@corneliuscrewe677 not at all.
@@agelessone You’re lying.
@@corneliuscrewe677 na im really not
We are so lucky to be able to still listen to the surviving apollo astronauts. They have flown faster and further then anyone else. Going back to the moon is a backward step that we have already achieved. We have the technology but not the brains to have been to Mars already. NASA in the 60s was at it's best.
Was it easy walking around in temperatures of 220 F during the day and not freezing to death when you walked in the shade where it was -220 F ?
How powerful were those portable air conditioners that reverted from heating the space suit to cooling it.
what power source they used to maintain everything? this was 100% hoax, they never send humans anywhere they do not send animals first. THE entire thing is a fraud, people are stupid to believe this crap. ALL the missions not one time they show the earth from the moon, can you imagine the view?? they riding the buggy etc not ever showing the earth
what part of "the lunar day is a month long" is so hard for you morons to grasp? what part of "only the actual surface reaches those temperatures, with a fucking vacuum above it that does not convect heat" is so fucking hard for you utter dimwits to understand?
What's the difference between temperature and heat?
@thePiercingTruth
ruclips.net/video/KpuKu3F0BvY/видео.html&feature=share&si=ELPmzJkDCLju2KnD5oyZMQ
Yes apart from temp there were harmful radiations too.. that thin suit can't handle those witj 60's tecnology.
30:15, whats the scariest moment of going the moon, he replies, scariest?? It didnt happen...
Yes, the whole thing had been planned out and so when they asked him what was the scariest part, his reply was 'it didn't happen', in other words, he didn't get scared because he had rehearsed it so often.
Why do people think that taking a 2 second statement completely out of context proves _anything_ ? Talk about twisting other people's words....
@@DeadEyeJedi search, Zoey interviews buzz aldrin, 7 minutes in
We didnt go there and thats the way it happened said 7 mins in on zoey interviews buzz aldrin, hes old and forgetting to lie 🤣🤣
@@kane9996
And once again, you are selecting a _single phrase_ from an entire video and trying to misdirect people into thinking it was in a different context to the way it was _actually worded_ .
For example, in the video you keep lauding regarding an interview between Buzz Aldrin and a young girl named Zoey, the bit that is avoided is the question leading up to what he said, Zoey asked Buzz "why didn't we go back to the Moon?", Buzz's reply was "that's the thing, we _didn't go_" and he was talking about how much of a pity it was that we never returned to the Moon after the Apollo series.
People like you try to twist a few moments from an entire interview in your favour without _ever_ bothering to look at the whole of said interview. It's blindingly obvious he is talking about the fact that we _didn't go back to the Moon_ . A child could understand that, you, apparently, cannot.
@@DeadEyeJedi go timelapse some more sunsets you loser
30:16
remove before flight.. he's trying to say the truth.
Hes accidentally said it plenty of times....hell he once literally told a 7 year old girl when asked why we haven't gone back to the moon" quote " because we didn't go there" then his next attempted 4 recovery expansions answers right after only dug the hole deeper.....but oh those tin foil hattys...I almost feel sorry for people who unconditionally believe all of this nonsense, but then I realize thats not fair cause were all duped about crap in one way or another and I got my own issues to work on.....its still amazing the unconditional trust most have in these nonsense narratives though. I mean were talking thousands of contradictions when one even just does an hour of research...thousands! from there own words even over the years....
Buzz Aldrin, the very, very, very acceptable face of NASA and all who seek to go back into space, the moon and beyond!
@thePiercingTruth Idiot!
@thePiercingTruth if you read the stereogum interview with the bassist from RageATM you'll remember the quote "... That's what they told me to say!!!"
Whys he wearing 2 watches ⌚️ 😂😂😂😂😂 and whats that on his right wrist...
I don't know whether Buzz was having an off day, maybe feeling his age or was loaded but this was terrible. He was very sporadic, his thoughts were all over the place, very incoherent.
Buzz has never (publicly) entertained the philosophical notions of his moon landing. What was the biggest impact of the first moon landing? The development of an industry capable of strategic missile defense. What were his initial thoughts upon exiting the lander? "I had a job to do." Is landing on the moon again with more advanced technology a good idea? What's more important is stimulating public interest and then funding for a clearly defined objective. He actually answers every question, though it sometimes seems like he doesn't. My absolute favorite moment in NASA history was when he punched that guy in the face for calling him a liar and a fraud. The young audience is looking for sound bites and he just won't give it.
yeah? "It didn't happen" is a pretty good sound bite at minute 30. Makes sense since going to the moon would've violated the second law of thermodynamics.
@@russbonanno3765 so we never went?
@@doraanaisnin5199 no one’s ever gone. We don’t even know what the moon is and space is a second law of thermodynamics violation; it cannot exist as we were told.
They edit this video, he admitted he never went to the moon 🌙 it’s a all a lie
This man is such an incredible man. He showed me that human beings have limitless potential.
It didn't happen.
@@JessicaSteeleLive He did not understand that because of his limitless potential of believing anything.
Nevada desert ,fantasy land ! Never left this realm ! Watch the footage very carefully!
@@darrenenright1728 🤠🤪🤪🤠
Este hombre es un gran mentiroso. Que explique como se pudo pasar el cinturón de asteroides de Van Halen que tienen más de 3.000 grados de temperatura.
IT NEVER HAPPENED 30:15
One of the Greatest American Traitors of all time.
cant express how much you disgustme, the man put his life in danger, you only doit when open your fridge for a beer and could choke with a peanut.
@@edgardoaltmann8619 But have you really looked into it? You obviously have swallowed the official narrative, but have you listened to the other side? If not I think you should consider. What's there to lose?
Bart Sibrel, Richard D Hall two guys I know of that can break it down pretty good imo- I dare you to have a look at what they have to say.
If you don't even bother, you just choose to keep your mind closed, well you are like the definition of a sheep and I think you should think twice before you call people disgusting.
With all due respect.
i dont anwer people that dont sign with his real name, like me.
@@edgardoaltmann8619 My name is Lars Petter Eriksen, I'm Norwegian.
Have you dared to look at the other side of the argument?
ok, thats better, im argie and live in patagonia. so you say moonlandings are fake. kubrick film all in nevada. its so stupid i simply no time to loose talking with flatearthners. have a good day and get a brain.
Who was the guy holding the camera when you took your first step on the moon ?
There was a camera on the leg of the Lander pointing towards the ladder for the exact purpose of filming the first steps. This can easily be looked up.
Why do people always assume "a guy" has to be holding a camera for it to function?
That's a really cool tie BTW!
Po izrazima lica mu se vidi da on nikada nije bio na mjesecu. Ne verbalna komunikacija😢
At 30:16 a nice freudian slip there Mr Buzz.
Lady in the second row: "What was the scariest moment of the journey?"
Buzz: "Scariest? It didn't happen, it could've been scary..."
I think he was talking about the circuit breaker problem, if it weren’t attended to or he missed it then they wouldn’t have gotten home. He wasn’t saying the moon landing didn’t happen, he was saying the scariest bit didn’t happen but if it did it could have been scary. He’s really old here and trying to compound all these memories. You can tell that he speaks long form sentences, he wasn’t finished talking about the circuit breaker until someone else was asking a question. So it’s not really fair to treat his responses as someone youthful in a sense.
Thegooob95 That's my take too, but I guess if you believe it's one big fraud, you'll find "evidence" for that everywhere.
Sounds pretty fishy
@@16alphav You mean those that look for any little slip up or any opportunity to take something said out of context as to only back up their on ignorant silly belief that it’s all a hoax while completely dismissing the tons of factual hard evidence that it did indeed happen. Literally every single thing you deniers come up with have been debunked over and over yet derpity derp derp it’s still all a hoax. By chance are you a flat Earther too ? 🙄
"The rock box were heavy..." ... ehhh, on the Moon??? He talks about getting the samples up the latter and then the lift off.. It would not be heavy on the Moon...
Yes it would. It would just be even heavier on the Earth.
Just so you firmly understand what his point was. The spacesuit he wore was almost 200 pounds, and it had quite limited movement. He had nearly 50 pounds of lunar material in the box. The LM's ladder is nearly vertical. Can you connect those dots? Even though weight is 1/6th on the moon compared to Earth, that doesn't make it 6x easier. Stop looking at things blindly and just objectively think for once.
I'm a huge, lifelong, devotee of space exploration and I love Buzz, but what the hell is he talking about, here?
He answers questions by amateurs.
His programming has broken down.
Yes tough questions like swear on this bible you walked on the " moon".
@@langleybeliever7789 What good would that have done? Sibrel simply accused the person of blasphemy for lying on the bible. All of the astronauts knew that. So when Sibrel got him to a hotel for an interview based on false pretenses, Aldrin simply refused.
Instead of backing off, Sibrel kept harassing and ultimately cornered him.
So Aldrin decked him.
Waaaaal he is very old
30:20 his answer, wake up
He is saying the scariest thing about the whole mission is the circuit breaker. It’s the heart of the craft and breakage spells doom. He is saying something .
Whats was the scariest moment,,??,,, it didn`t happen,,,,, it could have been scary,,,,,, ,,,,wake up nice try🤣🤣🤣🤣bozo
@@Dr.sasofficial No he did not. There was no circuit breaker mentioned. After he said it never happened and everybody laughed and after asked by the female next to him to return to the script he started mentioning the circuit thing
@@Dr.sasofficial question was "what was the most scary moment of the journey" and his response was crystal clear "it never happened it could have been scary you with me there...hmmm?" There no circuit breaker mentioned stop being foolish
30:29 literally him saying circuit breaker before she interjects at all
It's good to see Colonel Aldrin enjoying public attention, after reading his book "Magninificent Desolation".
His admitted it was a hoax!
@@rowdyyates4273 *he
Interesting the slowest loading clip ever I’ve experienced in YT
Buzz the 2nd actor onto the studio floor
Shut up
How could a studio that big be made during that time? Explain.
@@chummygun lmao. Oh looks like u got us cornered. Man couldn’t have faked it because building too big…😂
30:17 response “it didn’t happen” then talks about a box of rocks😆
@b-1sauce525 do you know how to listen, he was talking about a circuit breaker
Your explanation was very brief Mr Aldrin ! We need your advice & support in order to get more informations to enhance our knowledge about space exploration !
Are you deaf ?
Space exploration is in Hollywood 🤣
@@RealidadeDaTerra - for the space exploration to act all the relevant operations & processes in Hollywood thence all relevant features concerned would be depicted there !
@@zulkiflimdhussain1863 because he didn’t go the moon.
@@dylansalazar1226 - the information related to the space exploration as briefs by Mr Buzz Aldrin was important didn’t matter whether he reached or didn’t reach the moon !
I watched it live in 1969 to this day I don't understand how President Nixon talk to Neil Armstrong on a landline phone
It was patched into a radio, something that had been done for decades prior to Apollo.
The moon is about three light seconds away. Like talking on Skype.
@terryhill4732 you don’t understand how president Nixon could talk to the astronauts on Moon via a landline telephone??? Very simple, they just connected his phone to the radio transmitters they used to talk to the astronauts. Just as simple as that, you should try to learn some very basic communications technology.
they had a long cable installed
going all the way to the moon
@@YDDES Sorry young blood but there's alot of places on earth a cell phone won't pick up and saying it was done decades before Apollo is asinine no space program even existed decades before the 1960's, learn something before you commt
What is the difference between walking on the Earth & on the moon , Mr Aldrin ?
zulkifli md hussain He’s said balance. You weigh much less than on Earth but the 360 lbs backpack still has equal momentum which would carry on it’s kinetic motion whichever way you were traveling. He said it was like moving with an elephant on your back, lighter but changing direction was difficult. Thats why on all the vids they do that weird shuffle.
The disney lemaitre copernicus freemasonic luciferian hollywood sci-fi psy-op DECEPTION known as ‘outerspace’ is brainwashed, indoctrinated and deliberately propagated with an intricately detailed narrative to HIDE and DENY the existence of YHWH's Heavenly Kingdom and His Son Yahushua The Messiah above us ✝️ 🤦🏽♂️😭 🙌🏽 👼🏽
ruclips.net/video/7nFwPDZF_Z8/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/UbYtkrTquXE/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/AeIGrEtPMmE/видео.html
Neil Armstrong said that walking on the moon felt like earth. 😂 I agree! They were at the Area 51 filming or at the Hollywood studio filming. 🤣
@@alwaysabondgirl1301 - as the gravity on the moon was 1/6 as of the Earth’s 😠how would you define the actual feelings of walking. on the moon & on the Earth ?
@@zulkiflimdhussain1863 , those astronauts are paid liars. 🤣
These are the questions from oxford students Oo.
yeah it's game over man
5:56 Wait, he wouldn't have gone if it was a one way trip?
There must have been a major risk that the moon landing could have turned into a one-way trip and something the astronauts was prepared for?
Yes, it was possible, but as NASA said, despite rumours to the contrary, they did not give astronauts suicide pills, because they would NEVER give up with trying to get them home.
this is painful to watch
He's old.
@@jojo-fu4xh - That's true. He was 85 when he did this interview. He's remembering events from 46 years previous. I couldn't tell you much about what I was doing 46 years ago.
@ps10iceman - You piece of shit.
And, you have never tasted allcohol ???
@@Phase52012 He was a stripper 46 years before this.
I'm calling bs
Did they answer?
Great to see buzz in context, not snippets. Don't skip, watch the entire video, he shares some serious and some jokes. All round, glad i watched to see the truth.
He certainly was on the moon and the 1st man to pee on the moon, even tho it stayed in his suit.
No child they didn't go to the moon and Candace Owens most recent episode proves it 💯 🎉🎉🎉
@MaudeWhite-yc6ji bs dude, you have no idea about context, meaning and buzzs sarcasm. Get over it, when they go back to the moon next year. You will see what they left behind, such as the flag and reflective mirror, still there as it was.
Buzz, to infinity and beyond!!
The disney lemaitre copernicus freemasonic luciferian hollywood sci-fi psy-op DECEPTION known as ‘outerspace’ is brainwashed, indoctrinated and deliberately propagated with an intricately detailed narrative to HIDE and DENY the existence of YHWH's Heavenly Kingdom and His Son Yahushua The Messiah above us ✝️ 🤦🏽♂️😭 🙌🏽 👼🏽
ruclips.net/video/7nFwPDZF_Z8/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/UbYtkrTquXE/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/AeIGrEtPMmE/видео.html
@rainforest walker Satan deceives, that's his priority in the world
You are our real hero sir😮 Humanity proud of you Mr Buzz Aldrin 😮❤.
I am not sure I would want to play poker with Buzz Aldrin
I would love to. His lies easy to identify
🚀👈☻️👉🦶🇺🇲
Buzz said it didn't happen. I think he feels bad about lying to the world.
Yes, the whole thing had been planned out and so when they asked him what was the scariest part, his reply was 'it didn't happen', in other words, he didn't get scared because he had rehearsed it so often.
Why do people think that taking a 2 second statement completely out of context proves _anything_ ? Talk about twisting other people's words....
@@DeadEyeJedi Find the other interview of Buzz telling a little girl that he didn't go to space. Nasa made space up to hide God from us. The earth is a flat plane protected by a dome. The heavens are above the dome. The moon is made out of plasma and you can't land on it. Space is fake. And the biggest money laundering that exists. Satanists rule this place. God tells us in the Bible over 200 times the form and shape of the earth. A rainbow is the reflexion of the dome. The whole thing is a lie. What happened to the moonlight when they landed on it. lol.
@@c.5315
In the interview between Zoey and Buzz, she asked why we didn't go back to the back to the Moon, Buzz's reply was mourning the fact that if we had kept going back to the Moon we could have achieved a lot, "but we didn't go."
Try watching the whole interview rather than a heavily edited snippet before you start talking rubbish.
Edit: Posted because it seems this person cannot understand plain English.
@@DeadEyeJedi He's said it several times now. Those paying attention know it.
@@RobGordon35
LOL. 'Those paying attention'...
That's hilarious.
We went to the moon and back 5 times without a hitch YA RIGHT
At least 8 times from my own memory.
Also, Apollo 13? Apollo 1? Might have had a couple teeny tiny hitches there, doncha think?
@@GuardianSoulkeeper I guess there were 6 landings on the moon
@@GuardianSoulkeeper nice cgi globe as a profile picture. Why not use a real picture? Hahaha, such idiots duped because they just fall in line
@@MrHendrix999
6 landings, 7 times orbiting the moon, 1 loop around the moon.
Big E. Without a hitch? You must have a lousy memory. What about Apollo 13?
1:01:55
30:16 "it never happened. It couldn't have been scary"
Steve Smith Thank you for pointing out 1:01:55 because I’m not sure if I would listened that long!
@@Peterkramer929 Least second time he says that on air "we didnt go there..."
@@narajuna which time?
I was hoping that he was going to tell the complete truth about everything. But we all know that it's impossible to travel to the moon, land on it, and survive. I say that because of the nuclear issues that happened in Japan, nobody had any equipment to protect them from the nuclear effects of that, but had the protection from levels of gamma rays, and the different levels of radiation that would kill humans, but didn't have the same PPE???? It's just not adding up
The Soviet space program sent two Tortoises to the moon and back in 1968 before the US landed on the moon. They were healthy on return, and were dissected several months later.
@@dansv1
These people base their science on the concept of 'I reckon', I don't think they're really interested in facts.
Buzz, the first man to urinate on the moon.
the watches, a real gangsta here!
Because he was a gangsta or some other similar kind of trash before he started to pretend he is Buzz Aldrin in 1998.
"LOW EARTH ORBIT" = "WITHIN THE ATMOSPHERE OF THE EARTH" 😂
Someone told him not to give the full story on the UFO sightings any more. A bit disappointing.
Who told him not to talk about the Ufo,s on the moon?
A lot of people drank the Kool Aid in this comment section. Very sad.
ur a women u just listen to what your told
Ask him why he punched Bart Sibrel in the face for asking him to swear on the Bible that he went to the moon.
He punched him because he had called him a liar and a coward to his face. The guy had it coming.
Aldrin put his life on the line for his country more than once. Why should he let some punk stalker insult him with impunity?
I’ve read that the punk tried to sue Aldrin but the judge laughed and threw it out.
You seem to be lacking some details in your narrative there, chump.
On September 9, 2002, Aldrin was accosted by conspiracy theorist Bart Sibrel and a film crew outside a Beverly Hills hotel he was lured to on the pretext of being interviewed for a Japanese children’s TV show. Sibrel cornered Buzz Aldrin in Beverly Hills and badgered him about whether the moon landing and his lunar walk was fake. “You’re the one who said you walked on the Moon when you didn’t,” Sibrel says.
Sibrel even shoved the Bible in Aldrin's face a couple of times, asking him to swear on the book. And if that wasn't enough, he went on to call Aldrin “a coward, and a liar, and a thief.”
@@dansv1 "thie-f"*
Hehehehehehe.
The scariest moment is pushing a circuit breaker in. Or it didn't happen.