Tech Talk: John Martinis, "Design of a Superconducting Quantum Computer"

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 дек 2024

Комментарии • 42

  • @akadrat1762
    @akadrat1762 3 года назад

    Thanks for the effort to put this on the web, even with subtitles. Just a minor thing: at around 39min, the Bloch sphere is misspelled as "block sphere"...

  • @SoCalFreelance
    @SoCalFreelance 7 лет назад

    This is the most honest video I've seen on quantum computers so far. I'm highly skeptical until I see the theoretical physics carried over into a real working product with multiple proof of concept demonstrations.

  • @sherri99516
    @sherri99516 10 лет назад

    Very interesting: Tech Talk: John Martinis, "Design of a Superconducting Quantum Computer".
    Thanks GoogleTechTalks for hosting this 1.04.31 lecture.

  • @sirMAXX77
    @sirMAXX77 10 лет назад

    This is really awesome, it's a shame I won't be around to see how far this goes through the next few hundred years. It's amazing how advanced the human brain is and we're still trying to figure it out. This is the first step in to making an artificial brain.

  • @rgaleny
    @rgaleny 10 лет назад

    Would the Photon Alligator guide help stabilize the process?

    • @rgaleny
      @rgaleny 10 лет назад

      If it's just another Ion trap, never mind.

  • @balrampillai5314
    @balrampillai5314 4 года назад

    And this was SIX YEARS AGO!......

  • @DoisKoh
    @DoisKoh 10 лет назад +1

    WOAH WOAH WOAH!
    SOOO EXCITING

  • @wclewis123
    @wclewis123 9 лет назад

    That said it's a nice presentation with some very nice empirical data.

  • @oker59
    @oker59 10 лет назад

    It just took a little playing around with which way to do the error codes;

  • @rgaleny
    @rgaleny 10 лет назад

    Build chips with only as many Q bits as can be error checked well, then tie them together into a sequential Hierarchy. It may take up more space, but, if you can get 512 going at 10 bits per chip, it wont be so bad.

  • @wclewis123
    @wclewis123 9 лет назад +1

    I distrust anyone who starts off with an attack on their potential competitors.

  • @ISH3000
    @ISH3000 10 лет назад

    Just to think we went from counting with sticks and stones, to using an abacus to using giant calculators that filled up rooms and generated a lot of heat to having complex computers that fit in our palm / pocket..
    And yet all we have done from the dawn of civilisation till now is basically warm the air around us...

    • @ISH3000
      @ISH3000 10 лет назад

      The order of life... In order to live something must die.. It's inevitable.. Like natural selection!

  • @Nilguiri
    @Nilguiri 10 лет назад +1

    51:52 A 19 qubit and a c.50 qubit sausage fest.

  • @rgaleny
    @rgaleny 10 лет назад

    A Phosphorus Atom in a mini capacitor would be isolated.

    • @rgaleny
      @rgaleny 10 лет назад

      Never mind, thanks Josephson junction.

  • @ferashamdan4252
    @ferashamdan4252 4 года назад

    للاسف لم يعحبني اسلوب المحاضر.

  • @lennyhome
    @lennyhome 10 лет назад

    Quantum computers are good at is breaking public key cryptography and almost nothing else. There are indications that by now the NSA already has it and you've paid for it.

    • @lennyhome
      @lennyhome 10 лет назад

      So Bruce Schneier is an ignorant, right? Because I learned the the fact that quantum computers are only good at spying on you from him. I can dig up the video if you want. You big Turd.

    • @codediporpal
      @codediporpal 10 лет назад

      NSA Tin Foil aside, they would also be useful in guaranteeing transmission of data where snooping is impossible w/o detection.

    • @lennyhome
      @lennyhome 10 лет назад +1

      That doesn't require a quantum computer.

    • @VeilerDark
      @VeilerDark 10 лет назад

      lennyhome we all know that quantum computers
      are atomic entangled spin apparatuses,
      but requier very low temperatures and that is not
      practical for massive productions.
      we know also that quantum computers are
      averaging data machines, so they run very vast and
      average the optimum option.
      we can build mechanical and electrical
      non atomic quantum computers that allow
      entangled spin rotations,
      and still we will have to average running the apparatus
      for 500msec to average many million probable solution to select
      the optimum.
      today we have the math and the know how.
      Also, we all know about low temperature hypermagnetic levitation.
      We can mimic that at normal temperatures,
      with to classic electromagnets,
      but in order the system does not fail at the sides
      we have to create a complex magnetic grid,
      that even inverses at some points the field polarization
      in order the system does not fail at one side.
      Well, in my lab I have mixed both.
      Quantum non atomic computing
      and rotational systems, but we can build rotistors,
      tiny electric parts like entangled memristors
      that rotate at different speeds - each component,
      we run the rotistor for 500 msec
      to average and extract the optimum solution.
      Of course the old rotistors are not so fast,
      so it might take 3 seconds to average the optimum solition,
      but a well build one is way faster.
      The Koch family can support that effort!
      We need practical solutions with tiny rotistors
      so billions of people can buy a cheep great quantum computer
      and not like today, that we have so few atomic quantum computers
      that allow a tiny only number of entangled rotating components.
      The more it costs a design, the sillier the builder,
      and the most boring the science behind.
      We need PRACTICAL applications available for EVERYONE
      and HUGE computational power to subserve everyday tasks
      and not theoretical only.
      The "correct" entangled answers allow more current, higher values, wider dynamic ranges.

    • @TJGalloway1
      @TJGalloway1 9 лет назад

      +lennyhome That's false. They're also incredibly useful for optimization problems.

  • @95FatAsses
    @95FatAsses 10 лет назад

    kiads

  • @ninosawbrzostowiecki1892
    @ninosawbrzostowiecki1892 10 лет назад

    I hope this isn't some ploughgoataah... I hope this is legit.

  • @justsaynotoboomers
    @justsaynotoboomers 10 лет назад +4

    pretty sure jesus didnt say we needed quantum computers... i smell the devil at work here

    • @youtubepantheon8973
      @youtubepantheon8973 10 лет назад +3

      ABSOLUTELY. Because also pretty sure god doesn't exist

    • @KevinP32270
      @KevinP32270 8 лет назад

      HAAAA

    • @wreksangel
      @wreksangel 7 лет назад

      Oh, God exists.... Nothing to do with this fool here, though.

    • @justsaynotoboomers
      @justsaynotoboomers 7 лет назад

      Don't you feel incomplete without jesus in your heart?

    • @StygianStyle
      @StygianStyle 7 лет назад

      Do dogs go to heaven?

  • @Ihavetruth22
    @Ihavetruth22 9 лет назад +1

    None of this is practical