Thanks for the effort to put this on the web, even with subtitles. Just a minor thing: at around 39min, the Bloch sphere is misspelled as "block sphere"...
This is the most honest video I've seen on quantum computers so far. I'm highly skeptical until I see the theoretical physics carried over into a real working product with multiple proof of concept demonstrations.
This is really awesome, it's a shame I won't be around to see how far this goes through the next few hundred years. It's amazing how advanced the human brain is and we're still trying to figure it out. This is the first step in to making an artificial brain.
Build chips with only as many Q bits as can be error checked well, then tie them together into a sequential Hierarchy. It may take up more space, but, if you can get 512 going at 10 bits per chip, it wont be so bad.
Just to think we went from counting with sticks and stones, to using an abacus to using giant calculators that filled up rooms and generated a lot of heat to having complex computers that fit in our palm / pocket.. And yet all we have done from the dawn of civilisation till now is basically warm the air around us...
Quantum computers are good at is breaking public key cryptography and almost nothing else. There are indications that by now the NSA already has it and you've paid for it.
So Bruce Schneier is an ignorant, right? Because I learned the the fact that quantum computers are only good at spying on you from him. I can dig up the video if you want. You big Turd.
lennyhome we all know that quantum computers are atomic entangled spin apparatuses, but requier very low temperatures and that is not practical for massive productions. we know also that quantum computers are averaging data machines, so they run very vast and average the optimum option. we can build mechanical and electrical non atomic quantum computers that allow entangled spin rotations, and still we will have to average running the apparatus for 500msec to average many million probable solution to select the optimum. today we have the math and the know how. Also, we all know about low temperature hypermagnetic levitation. We can mimic that at normal temperatures, with to classic electromagnets, but in order the system does not fail at the sides we have to create a complex magnetic grid, that even inverses at some points the field polarization in order the system does not fail at one side. Well, in my lab I have mixed both. Quantum non atomic computing and rotational systems, but we can build rotistors, tiny electric parts like entangled memristors that rotate at different speeds - each component, we run the rotistor for 500 msec to average and extract the optimum solution. Of course the old rotistors are not so fast, so it might take 3 seconds to average the optimum solition, but a well build one is way faster. The Koch family can support that effort! We need practical solutions with tiny rotistors so billions of people can buy a cheep great quantum computer and not like today, that we have so few atomic quantum computers that allow a tiny only number of entangled rotating components. The more it costs a design, the sillier the builder, and the most boring the science behind. We need PRACTICAL applications available for EVERYONE and HUGE computational power to subserve everyday tasks and not theoretical only. The "correct" entangled answers allow more current, higher values, wider dynamic ranges.
Thanks for the effort to put this on the web, even with subtitles. Just a minor thing: at around 39min, the Bloch sphere is misspelled as "block sphere"...
This is the most honest video I've seen on quantum computers so far. I'm highly skeptical until I see the theoretical physics carried over into a real working product with multiple proof of concept demonstrations.
Very interesting: Tech Talk: John Martinis, "Design of a Superconducting Quantum Computer".
Thanks GoogleTechTalks for hosting this 1.04.31 lecture.
This is really awesome, it's a shame I won't be around to see how far this goes through the next few hundred years. It's amazing how advanced the human brain is and we're still trying to figure it out. This is the first step in to making an artificial brain.
Would the Photon Alligator guide help stabilize the process?
If it's just another Ion trap, never mind.
And this was SIX YEARS AGO!......
WOAH WOAH WOAH!
SOOO EXCITING
That said it's a nice presentation with some very nice empirical data.
It just took a little playing around with which way to do the error codes;
Build chips with only as many Q bits as can be error checked well, then tie them together into a sequential Hierarchy. It may take up more space, but, if you can get 512 going at 10 bits per chip, it wont be so bad.
I distrust anyone who starts off with an attack on their potential competitors.
Just to think we went from counting with sticks and stones, to using an abacus to using giant calculators that filled up rooms and generated a lot of heat to having complex computers that fit in our palm / pocket..
And yet all we have done from the dawn of civilisation till now is basically warm the air around us...
The order of life... In order to live something must die.. It's inevitable.. Like natural selection!
51:52 A 19 qubit and a c.50 qubit sausage fest.
A Phosphorus Atom in a mini capacitor would be isolated.
Never mind, thanks Josephson junction.
للاسف لم يعحبني اسلوب المحاضر.
Quantum computers are good at is breaking public key cryptography and almost nothing else. There are indications that by now the NSA already has it and you've paid for it.
So Bruce Schneier is an ignorant, right? Because I learned the the fact that quantum computers are only good at spying on you from him. I can dig up the video if you want. You big Turd.
NSA Tin Foil aside, they would also be useful in guaranteeing transmission of data where snooping is impossible w/o detection.
That doesn't require a quantum computer.
lennyhome we all know that quantum computers
are atomic entangled spin apparatuses,
but requier very low temperatures and that is not
practical for massive productions.
we know also that quantum computers are
averaging data machines, so they run very vast and
average the optimum option.
we can build mechanical and electrical
non atomic quantum computers that allow
entangled spin rotations,
and still we will have to average running the apparatus
for 500msec to average many million probable solution to select
the optimum.
today we have the math and the know how.
Also, we all know about low temperature hypermagnetic levitation.
We can mimic that at normal temperatures,
with to classic electromagnets,
but in order the system does not fail at the sides
we have to create a complex magnetic grid,
that even inverses at some points the field polarization
in order the system does not fail at one side.
Well, in my lab I have mixed both.
Quantum non atomic computing
and rotational systems, but we can build rotistors,
tiny electric parts like entangled memristors
that rotate at different speeds - each component,
we run the rotistor for 500 msec
to average and extract the optimum solution.
Of course the old rotistors are not so fast,
so it might take 3 seconds to average the optimum solition,
but a well build one is way faster.
The Koch family can support that effort!
We need practical solutions with tiny rotistors
so billions of people can buy a cheep great quantum computer
and not like today, that we have so few atomic quantum computers
that allow a tiny only number of entangled rotating components.
The more it costs a design, the sillier the builder,
and the most boring the science behind.
We need PRACTICAL applications available for EVERYONE
and HUGE computational power to subserve everyday tasks
and not theoretical only.
The "correct" entangled answers allow more current, higher values, wider dynamic ranges.
+lennyhome That's false. They're also incredibly useful for optimization problems.
kiads
I hope this isn't some ploughgoataah... I hope this is legit.
pretty sure jesus didnt say we needed quantum computers... i smell the devil at work here
ABSOLUTELY. Because also pretty sure god doesn't exist
HAAAA
Oh, God exists.... Nothing to do with this fool here, though.
Don't you feel incomplete without jesus in your heart?
Do dogs go to heaven?
None of this is practical