The DUMBEST PLAYOFF SCENARIO in AFL HISTORY
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 сен 2024
- How do you break up a tie between three teams in the most unfair way possible? Leave it to the American Football League to find a way
In 1968, there was a scenario unfolding in the Western Division where the Kansas City Chiefs, the Oakland Raiders, and the San Diego Chargers would all find themselves tied for first place in the division. How would the tie be broken? Not just a series of coin flips, but through one of the most unfair systems ever, where one team heavily benefitted as a result
Videos Mentioned:
1966 NFL Playoff Format: • The SCREWIEST PLAYOFF ...
Christmas Playoff: • The STRANGEST PLAYOFF ...
1970 Coin Flip: • How a COIN FLIP ALMOST...
Heidi Game: • Heidi Game 2: The Sequ...
1968 AFL Playoff: • The STUPIDEST PLAYOFF ...
CONTACT JAGUARGATOR9: contact@tablerock.com
BUY OFFICIALLY LICENSED NFL MERCHANDISE HERE: amzn.to/3B6hyE2
OFFICIAL JAGUARGATOR9 MERCHANDISE: jg9shop.com/
New listings every week! Get your official JG9 merchandise at jg9shop.com, featuring t-shirts, sweatshirts, mugs, and much more! Includes merchandise of the JG9 logo, the JG9 Live logo, some minigames played on JG9 Live, and a shirt symbolizing your passer rating if you did nothing but spike the ball into the ground on every single play
LINK TO PATREON: / jaguargator9
Get early access to videos, your name featured in the credits, and the ability to request future video topics by joining today for as low as $3!
LINK TO TWITCH: / jaguargator9_nfl
Play live NFL trivia every Wednesday night at 9 PM Eastern/6 PM Pacific with the chance to win cash prizes! Join me every Monday night at 9 PM ET where we'll have an informal Q&A session!
Check out the video below to learn more: • WEEKLY LIVE NFL TRIVIA...
LINK TO TIK TOK: vm.tiktok.com/...
See videos like this condensed down to 60 seconds by following JaguarGator9 on Tik Tok!
SUBSCRIBE TO JG9 NEWS: / @jg9news-xl4dq
Want to know my thoughts on the current happenings and news in the NFL? Subscribe to JG9 News!
SUBSCRIBE TO JAGUARGATOR8: / jaguargator8
Learn more about the weird history of college football by subscribing to JaguarGator8! New videos every Monday and Friday at 6 PM ET!
SUBSCRIBE TO JAGUARGATOR7: / @jaguargator7
Learn more about the weird history of MLB by subscribing to JaguarGator7!
HIRE JG9 ON FIVERR: www.fiverr.com...
Let JaguarGator9 create customized questions for your next NFL trivia show! Whether you want to play with a group of friends and family, or whether you want to host a trivia show for your business or company, JG9 has you covered!
#nfl #nflplayoffs #football #sports #highlights #nflhighlights #nflhistory #nflthrowback #nflfilms #1968 #americanfootball #playoffs #nflnews #afl
The helmets are the 1968 Raiders game results, in order, from top left to bottom right. Facing right is a Raiders win, left is a loss.
Bingo
@@OfficialJaguarGator9 Have thought of doing an NFL & MLB series of What If? Like What If Art Modell Kept The Browns in Cleveland
I knew it was the opponents the Raiders played (since he mentioned the Raiders' final three games and the Raiders weren't up there), but I for some reason couldn't figure out the direction condition.
Excellent! Thanks for the answer!
The three-team tiebreaker essentially could've made the Chargers the No. 1 seed in the Western Division playoffs. Definitely not fair.
Make a drinking game out of JG9 saying "By clicking the card in the upper right hand corner" and you'll be hammered after only 2 minutes.
He’s done a lot of videos over the years, and he’s bound to do a topic that is tangentially related to something he’s already done a video on before.
That’s one of the reasons we love JG9 so much, it’s these little quirks that you don’t see from a lot of RUclipsrs.
I like that viewers of this channel are so in tune with NFL history that there is no need to explain the Heidi game.
The chargers chargering being a decades old occurrence never ceases to tickle my fancy
Instead of coin flips, here's your three-team tiebreaker:
The starting middle linebackers from each team in a cage match. Three men enter, one man leaves.
Nice video- I talked about this situation two days ago and I agree what happened in 1968 was unfair and it was avoided in 1969 when the afl put in the only playoff format in its history-the first place teamin inthe western division would play the second place teamin the eastern division and vice versa- by the way , the name of the team in 1963 was the Boston patriots, not New England as they are now called- good stuff! 😊😊😊😊😊
Dang that Joe lol. Great video as usual my friend!
At the 6:40 mark. You said well over 40 points per game but you got that with the 112 points the raiders scored over 3 games... My math says that's just a little under 40 points per game... Unless I misheard what you said. Sorry, I've just never heard you make a mistake without catching it yourself first. Love everything about this channel and I hope you can see that I'm only joking, trying to entertain myself on my long trek to work. Appreciate all that you do and thank you immensely for it all!
I also noticed that the Raiders were mistakenly called Houston near the end of the video.
JG I love you you go back to the late 1960s and 1970s for I love NFL history
There are no 3-sided coins. However, an ordinary die, such as those used in Yahtzee and Monopoly, has six sides, which means you can choose the team with the bye and the host team for the first game in a single roll.
Justice for Caleb!
Thank goodness for real tiebreakers these days. Getting to the point where someone got to have a week off in the scenario discussed regardless of who hosted is pretty bizarre.
Nah, the dumbest is still the Chargers and Raiders only needing a tie to both get in and the Chargers saying no.
I miss you already Staley
Going by the source at 10:37, the Chargers would have been the away team if it had been a two-way tiebreaker situation. The Raiders-Chiefs home field advantage was also flipped between the two-way and three-way scenarios. I guess they were trying to make it fair that way.
A bigger joke: The Chargers were 8-5-1 in 1969, but missed the playoffs because of a stupid format (the 6-6-2 Oilers went to the playoffs instead, finishing second in a weaker division. AFL should have taken the two best non-division winners, not the two second place teams).
@jab1289 you are spot on about that and a Chargers-Raiders playoff would have been better than the 56-7 beating the Oilers took in that playoff game.
The Patriots were known as the Boston Patriots from the 1960 to 1970 seasons. They didnt become New England until they moved to Foxborough in 1971.
This came very close to happening in the 1957 NFL season in the Western Conference. Colts, 49ers and Lions were all 7-4 going into the last week and I think the Colts were in the position that the 1968 Chargers would have been in here. But the Colts lost to drop out and the 49ers hosted the Lions in the tiebreaker, with Detroit rallying to win. The Lions routed Cleveland in the championship game the following week.
What was more worse in this AFL playoff scenario, Jets got the No. 1 seed and got a bye week instead of raiders
There are several possible JG7 videos about weird tie breaker situations. One that comes to mind is the 1998 NL Wild Card where the Cubs, Giants and Mets could have finished in a three way tie. Fortunately the Mets collapsed and avoided a crazy three way tie situation
The NFL had a possibility of a 3-way tie for first in 1935 (because they failed to learn the lesson of 1932 because they failed to count tie games in the standings) in two different ways in the West Division (Packers, Lions and Cardinals; Lions, Bears and Cardinals), a 3-way tie in 1943 in the East Division (Washington, Giants and Phil-Pitt), a 4-way tie in the National Conference in 1951 (Rams, Bears, 49ers and Lions) and a 3-way tie in the Western Conference in 1957 (Lions, 49ers and Colts).
35 also was the season before every team was regularly scheduled to play the same number of games
"The Chargers get the bye week under this scenario between the three teams we're watching, and they get to host the western championship too. How is that fair?"
It's fair to the Chargers.
15:35 As early as 1968, the Chargers were Chargering.
The NFL could have had a 3-way tie two different ways in the West Division in 1935. The Packers still win their last game and finish 8-4-0, the Lions tie their last game instead of winning and finish 6-3-3, and the Cardinals tie their last game instead of losing and finish 6-3-3. Back then, ties didn’t count in the standings and thus all three teams would have a winning percentage of .667 (the NFL did not learn anything from 1932). The other scenario could have been the Bears still beat the Cardinals for their last games, and the Lions and Packers lose their last games. The Bears, Cardinals and Lions finish 6-4-2 and the Packers finish 7-5-0. This gives the Lions, Cardinals and Bears a .600 winning percentage (remember, ties are tossed out and not counted) and the Packers a .583 winning percentage.
In 1943, if the Phil-Pitt Steagles win their last game of the season, they would have been in a 3-way tie with the Giants and Washington at 6-3-1 in the East Division.
In 1951, if the 49ers still beat the Lions in their last games and the Rams and Bears tie instead of winning and losing, respectively, there would have been a 4-way tie with records of 7-4-1 in the National Conference.
If the Colts would have won their final game in the 1957 season, then the Colts, Lions and 49ers would have been tied at 8-4-0 in the Western Conference.
Well the AFL got it right and wrong for the 1969 playoffs: Right in that they had both second place teams as Wild Cards; wrong in that it was a crossover playoff format in the divisional round (1st place teams played the second place teams in the opposite division).
In my opinion, the AFL was _right_ . Looking at Spring Football Leagues, you play the teams from the same division twice and the teams from the opposite division once. Requiring same-division semis would introduce the possibility of the final game of the season being replicated the following week. Cross-division semis prevents this, at the cost of "naming a champion on the field"; instead, you name the division champ _through the standings_ .
Helmets might represent the evolution of the then-recent merger between the AFL and NFL. The rows represent a shift in the division and their respective winners through the earliest seasons..
On the helmet im going to say that was the final week matchup
This sounds like the playoff tiebreaker from "Friday Night Lights."
1968 chargers really collapsed
Is it possible to have a three-team tiebreaker in today's NFL?
It may happen this weekend with both AFC South & NFC South if im not mistaken
Yep. Happens quite a lot
rock, scissors, paper. Oak: mad bomber, mad stork, Madd-en coach
So in the end 1968 Chargers turned into 2023 Chargers
So you made a news channel when you haven't uploaded to the college or baseball channels in months?
I explained that in my 2023 recap vid. The news vids are just me talking about current events in an unscripted format. They take no time to make at all; I can whip one out in 20 minutes. The baseball and CFB vids require a ton of research and finding the footage and whatnot. It’s like apples and oranges. Those channels are returning once the NFL season is done
Apologies to Joes everywhere… selfish 😂
Is he coming off a respiratory infection or did he just hit a second puberty?
get a covid test