I think there's a typo on the slide at 4:05. He accidentally writes the definition of a Banach space rather than of a Hilbert space. (Below that he shows an inner product, rather than just a norm, so I don't think it was intentional.)
Can this approach of factorization of the Hamiltonian in the Hilbert space lead to a hierarchical structure of the universe: galaxies, groups of galaxies, clusters of galaxies, super-clusters of galaxies, clusters of super-clusters of galaxies, universes like our observable universe, and then Big Attractor as the entire universe.
Finally someone is on the right track without having listened to the rest of the video. This particle travelling in the one dimension allows for c to be constant (a displacement distance), it is able to travel from discrete to continuous and back to discrete nature which gives you equal pathtimes so that c is constant and does away with the illusion of general relativity while keeping everything conserved. Basically using the 2nd and 3rd dimensions to transverse continuously to get to next discrete 1 dimensional point.
I love Sean saves Schrodinger's cat 🐈. It was abused too much. Change in area=change in entropy=change in local speed of light? 41:00 VSL theory language may be more natural, than GR one(putting aside the fact it is more general, because of the nonlinear dispersion).
Sean doesn't talk much about decoherence as Penrose and Hameroff did with microtubules. When I studied QM I got the impression that any quantum state cannot be cloned, as no state can be reproduced. How microtubules can lead to QC functions (at room temperature) isn't discussed by Sean, but a hell of a lot of development in neuro science came to my notice. I still believe Maldacena's conjecture that the whole universe is a QC function is the hear of QM, leading to life, consciousness, soul, faith etc., provides the proof of divine design.
The Hilbert space is an infinite dimensional space, in which the dimensions are orthogonal to each other. How can we conceive this. Abstract algebra doesn't help us. Visual Complex Analysis by Tristan Needham does, as it defines the complex number i as the ratio of effect by cause (page 217). It is the only proof that all of the dimensions of Hilbert space is orthogonal to each other, as all cause and effect ate depicted in this space. Having said it, I notice Sean makes effort to understand the QUANTUM THEORY. Although I am not sure he can achieve Einstein's complete quantum formulation. Hope he does, although previously I disagreed with him when he called 'fine tuning' as 'rubbish'. This time QM is still vague. I wish him success.
How much of complex hilbert space of square integrable functions with gaussian weights do u understand? Always making lots of noise. Please go and learn from Prof B. Krishnan
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
As a layperson, I feel incredibly lucky to be able to "eavesdrop" on conversations like these.
I think there's a typo on the slide at 4:05. He accidentally writes the definition of a Banach space rather than of a Hilbert space. (Below that he shows an inner product, rather than just a norm, so I don't think it was intentional.)
Thank you Sean. Greatly appreciate your talk.
Can this approach of factorization of the Hamiltonian in the Hilbert space lead to a hierarchical structure of the universe: galaxies, groups of galaxies, clusters of galaxies, super-clusters of galaxies, clusters of super-clusters of galaxies, universes like our observable universe, and then Big Attractor as the entire universe.
Finally someone is on the right track without having listened to the rest of the video. This particle travelling in the one dimension allows for c to be constant (a displacement distance), it is able to travel from discrete to continuous and back to discrete nature which gives you equal pathtimes so that c is constant and does away with the illusion of general relativity while keeping everything conserved. Basically using the 2nd and 3rd dimensions to transverse continuously to get to next discrete 1 dimensional point.
Hilbert space describes *another* system, not the reference system. So there cannot be a system that describes *itself* in a Hilbert space.
On what branch is this talk?
I love Sean saves Schrodinger's cat 🐈. It was abused too much.
Change in area=change in entropy=change in local speed of light? 41:00 VSL theory language may be more natural, than GR one(putting aside the fact it is more general, because of the nonlinear dispersion).
Sean doesn't talk much about decoherence as Penrose and Hameroff did with microtubules. When I studied QM I got the impression that any quantum state cannot be cloned, as no state can be reproduced. How microtubules can lead to QC functions (at room temperature) isn't discussed by Sean, but a hell of a lot of development in neuro science came to my notice. I still believe Maldacena's conjecture that the whole universe is a QC function is the hear of QM, leading to life, consciousness, soul, faith etc., provides the proof of divine design.
@@sonarbangla8711 what is QC?
@@m74568 quantum chromodynamics
The Hilbert space is an infinite dimensional space, in which the dimensions are orthogonal to each other. How can we conceive this. Abstract algebra doesn't help us. Visual Complex Analysis by Tristan Needham does, as it defines the complex number i as the ratio of effect by cause (page 217). It is the only proof that all of the dimensions of Hilbert space is orthogonal to each other, as all cause and effect ate depicted in this space.
Having said it, I notice Sean makes effort to understand the QUANTUM THEORY. Although I am not sure he can achieve Einstein's complete quantum formulation. Hope he does, although previously I disagreed with him when he called 'fine tuning' as 'rubbish'. This time QM is still vague. I wish him success.
in his model Hilbert space is finite. so why this?
@@helicalactual In his model the complex plane is infinite. Isn't that enough?
We need a wave superfunction. Also, waves don't propagate in Euclidian-like vacuums.
Matter is curved Spacetime. Spacetime is unfolded matter. Learn CIG Theory.
rotating the triangles: starting from Planck’s constant, Pi,…etc
that was deleted too , no doubt.
but that’s not enough!
Too many ads
And at critical times!!
@@mauricelovelock6861 Then go get yourself a big unitary transformation and move to a better time frame.😊
sounds like a personal problem, i'm on the branch of the universal wave function without any ads.
Dielectric energy expands into vortices of Magnetism.
Magnetism gives Magnitude to the Universe.
The Grand Expand!
How much of complex hilbert space of square integrable functions with gaussian weights do u understand?
Always making lots of noise.
Please go and learn from Prof B. Krishnan
WTF is the wrong with his audience? I would never be as nice as he was.
What do you mean
Matter is curved Spacetime. Spacetime is unfolded matter. Learn CIG Theory.
Highfalutin
and real at the same time!!
And Silva method ESP BS as commercials. What an irony
Noise maker
toooooo loooooong
You tried so hard to achieve nothing