Awesome! I'm a bit more excited to see if NASA sends up that satellite to measure the amount of heating the sun's radiation and magnetism have on the earth though, it really needs to be tested, they are in early planning stages now I just hope they go through with it.
It's so cool seeing how physics and engineering do come together after all!!!!! (So I know this is mostly just a rivalry thing, but I did my undergrad in engineering physics, and I get "hated on" by both groups...)
6 лет назад
The "dislike" is quite natural. When you add real world limitations such as noise to the beautiful results the physicists' math predicts, and start asking questions about what sources of noise expect in order to minimize the impact, things easily take much more work than expected. For the engineers it is often the physicists who forgot to account for something, making the machine they made to specifications not work as intended. Things are hard when working at the edge of technology, and if you are the one messing up it is easy to say that things are hard because you know your own field better than theirs, while the other guy just didn't do their job well enough, and you couldn't check for them...
Sir i have a theory which might be wrong but i would be glad if you will tell me my mistakes it is on youtube and its name is "help me to figure universe out " by souler tandon
This is just my guess but i think the reason is: - it doesnt react - can be liquid in higher temp than helium and neon - its cheaper than heavier noble gases
Another reason is it's largish mass. You want lots of protons and neutrons for the neutrinos to hit so it's better than Helium and Neon in that regard. Krypton/xenon would likely be better but also a lot more expensive. Naturally occluding radioisotopes can also be a concern too. You want to see neutrino events not decay events.
ولادة قوانين Hello I have five questions about the Big Bang that created the universe And the particles of weak nuclear force Is the neutron decomposes to proton Is the neutron analyzed outside the atom or inside the atom? The second question about the particle of the weak force The boson Are the bosons formed at the beginning of the birth of the universe? Has the power of the Big Bang turned into quarks, electrons and bosons? The fourth question about the body of this weak force (the boson) Has the boson emerged from that energy of the Big Bang? The fifth question is whether a boson particle appears After the neutron turned into a proton? Please send my five questions to cosmologists .
What?! "Extends Life": No! "expands consciousness" No! And "is vital to space travel" Why are you so sure? It is not at present, and I'd be interested in any design for future space travel that depends on neutrinos, whilst its difficult to predict future technology I really don't see how the neutrino could be in any way useful in space travel, beyond the pointless argument that without it we might not be here to begin with. Where do you get this BS? DeepPacked Crapra?
Dark matter moves the stars around the galaxy . Have scientists discovered particles of black matter that move stars? Have scientists discovered dark energy particles?
Particles no. Dark is just another way of saying "something". This something is inferred by the existance of galactic motion in the case of dark matter.
Please drop the annoying techno music background, it's terribly distracting.
Exciting!
Awesome! I'm a bit more excited to see if NASA sends up that satellite to measure the amount of heating the sun's radiation and magnetism have on the earth though, it really needs to be tested, they are in early planning stages now I just hope they go through with it.
It's so cool seeing how physics and engineering do come together after all!!!!!
(So I know this is mostly just a rivalry thing, but I did my undergrad in engineering physics, and I get "hated on" by both groups...)
The "dislike" is quite natural. When you add real world limitations such as noise to the beautiful results the physicists' math predicts, and start asking questions about what sources of noise expect in order to minimize the impact, things easily take much more work than expected. For the engineers it is often the physicists who forgot to account for something, making the machine they made to specifications not work as intended. Things are hard when working at the edge of technology, and if you are the one messing up it is easy to say that things are hard because you know your own field better than theirs, while the other guy just didn't do their job well enough, and you couldn't check for them...
Sir i have a theory which might be wrong but i would be glad if you will tell me my mistakes it is on youtube and its name is "help me to figure universe out " by souler tandon
Why argon ?
This is just my guess but i think the reason is:
- it doesnt react
- can be liquid in higher temp than helium and neon
- its cheaper than heavier noble gases
Another reason is it's largish mass. You want lots of protons and neutrons for the neutrinos to hit so it's better than Helium and Neon in that regard. Krypton/xenon would likely be better but also a lot more expensive. Naturally occluding radioisotopes can also be a concern too. You want to see neutrino events not decay events.
Nice!
Where's Dr. Lincoln
ولادة قوانين
Hello I have five questions about the Big Bang that created the universe And the particles of weak nuclear force
Is the neutron decomposes to proton Is the neutron analyzed outside the atom or inside the atom?
The second question about the particle of the weak force The boson Are the bosons formed at the beginning of the birth of the universe?
Has the power of the Big Bang turned into quarks, electrons and bosons?
The fourth question about the body of this weak force (the boson) Has the boson emerged from that energy of the Big Bang? The fifth question is whether a boson particle appears After the neutron turned into a proton? Please send my five questions to cosmologists
.
Pretty sure it'll just created more questions about why matter exists.
The neutrino extends life. The neutrino expands consciousness. The neutrino is vital to space travel.
What?! "Extends Life": No! "expands consciousness" No! And "is vital to space travel" Why are you so sure? It is not at present, and I'd be interested in any design for future space travel that depends on neutrinos, whilst its difficult to predict future technology I really don't see how the neutrino could be in any way useful in space travel, beyond the pointless argument that without it we might not be here to begin with.
Where do you get this BS? DeepPacked Crapra?
Woah
thank God that these projects get funded!
Dark matter moves the stars around the galaxy
.
Have scientists discovered particles of black matter that move stars?
Have scientists discovered dark energy particles?
Particles no. Dark is just another way of saying "something". This something is inferred by the existance of galactic motion in the case of dark matter.
Why cant I see commets?
Test
Impressive! But nothing special will be found, sorry...
Vicente Rivera Who says that? You?
would be amazing to work on a project like that..instead of my boring dead end job.