Human Organs Debate | Janet Radcliffe Richards | Proposition

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 дек 2015
  • SUBSCRIBE for more speakers ► is.gd/OxfordUnion
    Oxford Union on Facebook: / theoxfordunion
    Oxford Union on Twitter: @OxfordUnion
    Website: www.oxford-union.org/
    The Motion: This House Would Legalise the Sale of Human Organs.
    Janet Radcliffe Richards continues the case for the proposition, as the third speaker of six in the debate.
    The motion was defeated.
    Janet Radcliffe Richards is a British philosopher who has written about feminism and bioethics.
    She is the author of several books, papers and articles, and has sat on a variety of advisory and working committees in areas of philosophy and bioethics. Since 2008, she has been Professor of Practical Philosophy at Oxford University. She is also a Distinguished Research Fellow at the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics and posts regularly at the University of Oxford’s Practical Ethics: Ethical Perspectives on the News website.
    ABOUT THE OXFORD UNION SOCIETY: The Oxford Union is the world's most prestigious debating society, with an unparalleled reputation for bringing international guests and speakers to Oxford. Since 1823, the Union has been promoting debate and discussion not just in Oxford University, but across the globe.

Комментарии • 11

  • @scottsmith7317
    @scottsmith7317 2 года назад +8

    This was brilliant.
    Came because I wasn't sure if I wanted to buy her book on this topic (the ethics of transplants: why careless thought costs lives). Have ordered it now though.

  • @GrahamLyons-fd6vr
    @GrahamLyons-fd6vr Год назад +4

    She changed my mind.

  • @TheFurchow
    @TheFurchow 7 лет назад +7

    masterful...

  • @user-bh7vc2kk7b
    @user-bh7vc2kk7b 4 месяца назад +1

    If anyone needs a kidney, heart and others, I'm ready.
    My blood type is B
    I am 28 years old
    I don't sell it,
    but I ask that my debt of 5 billion can be paid off,
    Thank You

  • @lytepk
    @lytepk 5 лет назад +2

    pog

  • @thecartooncynic
    @thecartooncynic 5 лет назад +2

    interesting that the sensible woman with the superior argument in a nice dress and is feminine, where as the opponent is wearing a pantsuit

    • @raasimahanthi4203
      @raasimahanthi4203 3 года назад +24

      Cartoon Cynic those two things have zero correlation to each other and the fact that you would make such a sad debate is well sad.

    • @gurnishsohal552
      @gurnishsohal552 3 года назад +5

      I will try not to judge you for that comment since it was 2 years ago. But it seems that you are being illogical.

    • @maxineeeee693
      @maxineeeee693 Год назад +5

      you're labeling clothes? lol