5 Amazing Future American Vehicles - War Thunder
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 июн 2024
- Get 3% Off on the War Thunder Store + DECAL :
bit.ly/3iLtBwh
Get 3% Off on the Enlisted Store :
bit.ly/3lqRLhz
Support my work on Patreon :
/ theeuropeancanadian
Support my work on SubscribeStar :
www.subscribestar.com/tec
Check out the Merch Store :
www.redbubble.com/people/TEC-...
Chapters :
0:00 Intro
1:05 Forgotten Horsemen
4:12 Frankenman
5:28 The Real Abrams
7:33 Upside Down Heli
8:59 Revolutionary Tactics
I am part of the War Thunder and Enlisted Content Partnership Program :
warthunder.com/en/media/partne...
All My Social Media Links :
linktr.ee/theeuropeancanadian
We have partnered with Humble Bundle :
www.humblebundle.com/?partner...
We have partnered with Fanatical :
www.fanatical.com/?ref=TheEur...
We have partnered with Chrono.gg :
www.chrono.gg/TECHUB
Send your Replays or Questions here :
britishcanadianman@gmail.com
Music used from:
/ teknoaxe
/ channel
System Specs : Intel Core i7-10700F CPU @ 2.90GHz, 32GB DDR4 @ 3200MHz, EVGA 3070TI FTW3
Hope you enjoy the video and have an amazing day :)
#gaming #news #warthunder 
Игры
Imagine they add the SEPv3 only to make it the first 12.0 vehicle, or say the DU only increases KE protection by 3%, or that M829A3 doesn’t have an anti-ERA tip (oh wait they already did that last one).
Anti-K5 ERA*
not all of them
It won't work against Relikt anyway.
*No proof of DU hull armor, uses same 1970’s prototype hull armor.*
@@jeffmeadows3795 red effect made a video about that
Yeah no DU in the hull
@@mehmetbozkurt3274 let them be happy
Something I want to see is the prototype SPAA with a GAU 8, a humvee with tow missiles, and the SEP v3 with DU armor, the trophy APS, and M829a3/4
Yea will never happen. If u asked the Russian devs American tanks get heavier not from extra armor but from thw crew gaining weight 😂
@@45atanneryea so funny bub
@@45atanner under rated comment :)
the sepv3 would be 12.7
DU is already modeled in the turret. And DU in the lower plate will not help you, it will only make you heavier
Vehicle that would be fun. - Toyota Hilux “Technicals” with a 20mm and maybe an RPG.
humvee with a minigun for 1.0, 50cal for 1.7, and 40mm Automatic Grenade launcher for like 3.3
They should add the T31 Demolition, essentially a Sherman HVSS but instead of the standard turret it had two rotary rocket launchers with the Calliope rockets and a flamethrower
Heck yea that would be amazing
ya see
the problem is
that would be fun
so it isn't gonna get added
I want IFVs to limit their ammo and allow 'troops' in the back so they can cap points faster, I think it would be cool to, you know, use the vehicle for its intended purpose and have a 10 or 15% faster cap! I think it would be neat and it would give light vehicles a different role
How to break the game with simple changes:
Probably like 5% 15% would be way to high
@@otterf104 how is 15% too high? 5% is barely noticable,15% is noticable but aint no way god damn game breaking unless its atleast 25%.
@user-sg9ql8nk1u this is gaijin we are talking about they will make it 5%
@@otterf104 yeah I'm not really saying anything like 100% needs to be that way, it would just give a little bit more incentive for light players! Light is basically just good at flanking but if you go in a site, you're just asking to get machine gunned
Ironically, the thing about the Bronco is not how fast it flies, but rather how slow it can fly. The Bronco is a STOL aircraft ( short take off and land). It’s strength is that it really doesn’t need an airport. One could easily operate from a helicopter base, ( this is what I would suggest if it’s added). It’s faster than a helicopter but slower than many planes. It’s armament would be like a Cobra. In game it would be most useful if they added scouting to it ( This is where TEC will get triggered) but it would work as a light attack. In order for it to be more effective in the air to ground role, if they could get the 20mm turret (on the later models) to plink away at ground targets it would be cool.
As to TECs disparaging remarks about the Bronco being “ugly”. I would just have him review some of the designs from the country of his birth and then let’s chat. Lol.
Honestly my thought for aircraft recon would be to make it work the same way as the scout drones.
They will still find ways to nerf future Abrams and the SEP V3 because reasons we simply can not say
SEP V3 doesn't fix the main issues with the tank, which is large profile and a massive weak spot.
New electronics does nothing for the tank in War Thunder.
@@harryshuman9637 other than weak spots, giving it Gen 2 and 3 thermals, DU in turret AND liners then it would be a great tank. But Gaijin hates US for reasons we all know
@@ricolives1166 Oh boy, here we go again...
- SEP, SEP V2 and AIM already have Gen 2 thermals, if you can't use find targets with Gen 2, you won't be able to find targets with Get 3.
- Turret cheeks already cannot be penetrated by anything in the game, and the tank still gets destroyed a dozen ways.
- There are no sources saying liners are installed. You can't even see them in the videos from inside the tank.
Abrams just sucks. It's only good for fighting underequipped 3rd world armies. The only thing that can salvage it is reduction in BR.
Also US teams are just terrible to begin with. Probably the biggest factor in poor US win rates in the game.
@@harryshuman9637no, the main reason the abrams sucks is because the crew on every tank work together perfectly and irl you can’t aim at tiny weak spots like you can in warthunder, one reason being is that your scope isn’t your barrel, and the crew doesn’t care about how tiny your crew compartment is, like a T72 and also the FCS for vehicles can only track helicopters and lase ranges nothing that the irl tanks have but all the problems in game are not really a problem irl, if you want a example play or watch ghost videos and see how must rounds either hit the ufp at a good angle or don’t really pen, because weak spots are hard to hit at 1km plus ranges
@@harryshuman9637but saying the abrams sucks irl because a video game is really dumb, because there are 100s of factors that play in using irl tanks, hell just ask a abrams tanker and ask him if he thinks he could hit the turret ring on a abrams at 1km or more
I believe heavy weapon loaded quad bikes were not meant to be used as "tanks" but just to reach positions where the weapon would be dismounted for use.
but would still love to see the Italian "Vespa 150 TAP", which is a scooter with a 75mm recoilless rifle.
You would be right considering how heavy a TOW missile is, reminds me of Afghanistan, where the local Boarder Police in Jalalabad mounted 14.5mm Hvy machine guns from Russian BRDMs on Gen2 Hmmwv.s, if it was fired from any angle except the front or rear the thing would almost flip over on its side.
@@mrmean1322 I ques in some cases heavy weapons were used while mounted, I believe the Germans in WW2 had a machine mounted on the sidecar of motorcycles meant to be used while mounted... but definitely not a TOW missile, you could but nah
@@mrmean1322 oh man what? you sucsesfully hip fire 14.5 hmg🤣
Along the lines of the OV-10 Bronco, perhaps the A-37 Dragonfly could be added and placed after it in the tree. While the OV-10 is a twin turboprop the A-37 is a twin jet and could go faster so would logically be placed after it. As for where they would be placed, I'm thinking perhaps Rank V for the OV-10 and Rank 6 for the A-37 between the Skyraider and A-10 so the OV-10 would be around the F3D-1 & F-84F while the A-37 would be around the A-4 & AV-8C. For armament the A-37B would have a 7.62mm GAU-2B/A (M134) minigun in the nose with 1500 rounds with provision for SUU-11A gun pods under wings, 8 hardpoints (capacity of 860 lb on inner 4, 600 lb on 2 intermediate and 500 lbs on outer 2) and could carry LAU-3/A (19x Mighty Mouse) rocket pods, AIM-9 Sidewinder and bombs (250 lb Mk 81, 500 lb Mk 82, 750 lb M117 GP bombs, BLU-32B or BLU-1C/B fire bombs, CBU-12, CBU-22 or CBU-24 Cluster Bombs and the SUU-14 Bomb Dispenser).
(I'm at 3:18, so forgive me if it's not said yet) if they don't add the bronco we definitely need the Cessna A-36 Super Tweet, lol
TEC, bravo for including one of my favorites but you overlooked one role for the Bronco. It also served as a medevac air ambulance.
Possibly useful if they ever add infantry to War Thunder.
guners on utility Helis, like a minigun on the side of an Huey like that on Bombers
this is a certified TEC video
soon we will get a toyota Tacoma with stingers on the back
0:58 most spall made by soviet style tank 😂
I want the scooter with the recoilless cannon
Vespa 150 TAP
I hope they add what your talking about because i love it ❤
Tiger II 10.5 with night vision,
The OV-10 Broncho still flies to this day on the Philippine Air Force.
I feel like the OV-10 would be hard as shit to find a tier to put it in
it's a turboprop
but it gets fucking aam's
I joined the army as a 19D, I was promised 4-wheelers, dirt bikes and dune buggies. What I got was a lot Bradley CFV time ( not complaining, I loved it). So Ill chuckle to myself if i see those added to the game. Though, I am more excited to see the amazing British vehicles that can be added.
well, we saw that they had an unfinished model of the Pucara, which is COIN, so perhaps now they will add it along with the Bronco and the Brazilian Tucano... hopefully!!! 🤞🤞🤞
There is literally 70 years of naval missing. I'm realy want to see some expansion with upcoming update in the naval area.
maybe by 2030 we will have early missile cruisers!
we are missing some of the most famous ships of ww2
the only way i really see ATVs working is if they implement them like the ground version of UAVs. instead of taking out an Aircraft, you spawn an ATV with two people, a driver and a gunner with 2-3 AT-4s.
honestly, given the trend with attackers, especially in the case of minor nations, i think the OV-10 Bronco stands a pretty good chance of being added in the near future.
They need to make the game more destructible and the ground like muddy and can get you stuck and other things
I like this type of video
Giving M833 to the normal M1 and KVT would be a good start
Cant wait for the t58 heavy hopefully it gets added I really want it as well the American t69.. m1 ACTTB would be great
honestly instead of the OV-10 I would say that the A-37 Dragonfly would fit in much better with the way the game works while being very similar except for the fact that it’s a jet instead of a very slow but advanced prop plane (ov-10 would have a much harder time finding a br for itself then the dragonfly would)
we definitely need more abrams premiums
Imagine a quad that you can switch the weapons by selecting secondary munitions
If the Thumper is added the T-14 Armata should make it's way in as well
M274 Mechanical Mule with a M40 recoiless rifle or a TOW launcher in the tank destroyer branch. Could also be added to the German tree. The M151 Mutt (Jeep )also had M40s and TOW missiles attached which could be added to US, UK, France, and Italy via Spain, then China via Taiwan.
I would place the OV-10, the Cessna Caravan (MC-208) and other slow aircraft with powerful modern guided weapons on the helicopter tech tree, that way those could not break the balance in Air RB and Air SB with their powerful modern weapons
The Cheyenne would have very good flight model but not OP weapons loadouts, i don't see why it didn't come yet
Super M60, Stingray light tank and Legacy Hornet when?
Instead of quad bikes which I feel would be completely out of the question for gaijin to add maybe a possibility would be a humvee equipped with a tow, since the Japanese type 93 already exists as an spaa for Japan why not add the us equivalent but as an atgm carrier other nations already have very similar light atgm carriers like Sweden and Israel just in much slower vehicles obviously
I think they should add the F-117 and RAH-66 Commanche as an introduction to stealth aircraft. They wouldn’t be overpowered, but would be wonderful to see in game. The F-117 would only be good in ground RB or air SB but it’s one of those vehicles that would still be fun to play. A vehicle being terrible in game hasn’t stopped Gaijin from adding it in the past so why should it now?
I really want the M1A2T it would give a real incentive to grind the ROC subsection of the China tree
Still waiting on that turret ring fix that was acknowledge. Also the fuel tanks are pseudo spall liners but the plate backing creates an absurd amount of spall. Honestly the Abrams are still amazing as its only the click-bait and AIM one deathers that ruin it.
The russians also have alot of interesting prototype vehicles like Object 490A and 490B or Black Eagle
Hellfire cropduster when?
Question about the depleted uranium armor. What is it really going to make stronger? The hull ? lol turret cheeks are already fortified. Du isn’t going to get rid of the giant weak spot turrent ring
The turret ring is currently modeled incorrectly - it should be volumetric, the turret itself is too tall, and in general it should be incredibly difficult to hit due to how small of a space the turret ring is. At most you’ll have ~60mm of space to aim a ~30mm APFSDS penetrator (for Russian 125mm) or ~22mm APFSDS penetrator (for NATO 120mm), but most of the turret ring - including the entire frontal arc - is at most ~35mm. That’s just unrealistic even with War Thunder’s mouse aim.
@@Iden_in_the_Rain okay? its a video game.. also theres like 3 other places you could shoot it
Would like the K2 to be added to the Japan tree.
If we get quadbikes they better add some of the many of the small and light "vehicles strapped to weapons" that we South Africans had 😊
I want to see more naval stuff, like maybe the USA finally getting the Colorado Class. It wouldn't really break anything as Japan already has a ship with 4x2 16" cannons on a faster hull. Colorado by comparison would have a bit better survivability overall and improved AA if it was a WW2 modernized version but overall I don't see why it's unreasonable to ask for.
Or you know USS Pennsylvania 1944 which is just an Arizona with even more armor, better secondaries, and actual AA. It would also be nice if we could get our 35 second top reload since every other nation seems to get their top practical reload while the Arizona seems oddly stuck with it's low-end practical reload.
I don't think it's reasonable to ask for any of the USN Fast Battleships yet. While ships like Scharnhorst are frustrating to fight with slow Dreadnought or Super Dreadnought type Battleships a true Fast Battleship would club everything way too hard to be reasonable.
Edit: Also I think it's about time that Britain gets a Queen Elizabeth Class. It's one of the most renowned classes of Battleship that the Royal Navy ever used and it's basically just a slower but more heavily armored Hood which they already have.
Humvee Avenger? LAV-25? Humveee-TOW? No? Just Abrams that circumstantially have what is already standard issue in modern Abrams? Okay.
The Abrams is the most nerfed tank in the game. Made of foil.
The A4-M Skyhawk should be added
Id much rather they give all tanks spall liners or give non of them it. Adding it to very select ones have just made those blatantly better in all aspects then those that don't.
first off... some tanks just dont have spall liners irl? 2nd off... the challenger 2 has spall liner.. and its not better then the abrams at all
@@datcheesecakeboi6745Gajin has adding things to the game that never existed or weren't used and used the excuse of ''balancing'' to justify it . Adding spall liners to tanks in game that didn't have it for balancing wouldn't change much.
its pronounced "Shiann" like the Native American Tribe
V22 osprey maybe?
What about spanish vehicles?
I want the comanche
Iranian tech tree in war thunder 😊❤
When is my m10 booker coming
Don’t know how amazing it will be, but from the looks of it; it will probably play similar to the TAM 2IP for Germany. But with better Ammo.
@@ICECAPPEDSKY that's fine. Thought knowing the Russian bot devs they won't even give it it's best ammo and say it dousnt help any. As they did for Abrams
A37 Super Tweet
RAH 66 Comanche.
Cheyanne is pronounced “Shy-Anne.” It’s a Native American tribe in the US.
Sep V3 Electric generator
the sep v3 have more armor
barely anymore and only in the most useless places
AH-56 Cheyanne is pronounced "SHY-AN"
f-2 viper zero
Walmart drone Walmart drone
The quads would be cool especially if us got the razors and they could have a very limited amount of ammo with maybe 1 or 2 atgms, could spot, MAYBE have a SAM or two as well but be the cost of your spaa! You only have one crew, it would be small and speedy, can kill the pesky campers if you can get around but nothing too much that can't be dealt with by any other person with a machine gun
It's pronounced shy-ann....like the Indians.
they are the least funny vehicles in war thunder tho
Ah, a video talking about mroe vehicles for the nation with the most vehicles.
Almost like Britain/Japan/France/Italy dont fucking matter anymore xD
Almost like they don’t have as much vehicles irl and not as many people play them xD
The USSR tech tree has the most vehicles out of every fucking tech tree.
Almost like the US has more vehicles irl and is played more than those nations xD
@@Anomaly26_ Excellent, now, back to real life.....
@@BugattiONE666if a nation can receive more vehicles, then why bitch about it. If you want a video asking for vehicles of other nations then make it.
People have made those videos before and do all the time. So yeah you could also just watch those.