What a load of rubbish! Kate isn't interested in any attention just working Vs Harry's wife who couldn't handle the lack of attention and hard work. This is trash
I find it hilarious that people portray Diana as being naive to royal protocol like she didn't grew up as daughter of one of the most important aristocratic families in UK
indeed, and on top of that they pretend like she didn't manipulate or call the press to make charles look like King Douchebag and her as the warm mother. Think these are the same people who also pull the "Meghan didn't know" card while there's over a dozen interviews of people saying she had a Diana crush as a teenager, read books about royals and visited buckingham palace. She'd heard of the monarchy and their kind of work, she was friends with eugenie ffs. It's different on the inside but both these women weren't as naive as they later pretended to be.
@@bbe3034 They are descended from German royalty though, which again goes back into British- the Queen is a direct descendent of William the Conqueror. All European Royal lines are strongly mixed.
@@mankytoes The British RF is way less mixed that most monarchies though. From imported German King George back in 1714 they only married other Germans for more than century and a half, at least for the heirs. They only branched out to other countries after it became political suicide marrying a German, although Philip was quite German he could hide it with a Greek nationality. The Queen is more British than any reigning monarch for centuries, thanks to her mum.
@@afterlifeauthor My thoughts exactly. If they were going to talk about Prince Andrew, they'd also have to dig out all the other men (and women) too, and the system would probably collapse.
honestly the headlines criticizing Kate for re-wearing an outfit are OUTRAGEOUS. why should she wear a coat that was TAILORED to perfection just for her only once?!
For real!! People buy clothes because they like the clothes. It shouldn’t be so weird to wear it more than once. It should be the opposite. So wasteful.
@@sandyno1089 your so right! why shouldn't wear her clothes more than once and have them retailored! It shows she is responsible and cares for the planet!
I'm happy to see that they are showing how the press were towards Kate and to bring this back into the spot light. This was at the begining of her relationship with Prince William especially the name calling etc etc from the press. It is easy for people to forget this or not even know what she went through herself. It is not easy being or becoming a princess it most definitely is not all fairy tales.
@phillychick4196 Yes AND they chose to be princesses, obviously. Kate which is her name not SHE, the difference being Kate is not a divorcee & dated William for a very long time before they married hence getting to know her spouse & future family which if course is The Royal Family only then could she learn & understand her place & responsibility within the Royal Family.
I recently revealed the genders of my two girlfriends. It got a lot of hate and now has 30 times more dislikes than likes. I am really sad that people can be so mean. Sorry for using your comment to talk about my problems, dear yet
True, it just feels unnecessarily toxic to pit women against each other, for no real reason. What's wrong with them simply being friendly, and respecting the other?
@@trinaq hey! These seems funny but I always catch you in the takes comment section and other essayist (or movie based yt videos) comment section, I don't know what to say but to say it's cool seeing you reply my comment lol,
@@tia4337 Yep, it's my pleasure to reply to your comment. The Take is one of my favourite channels, and I adore your profile picture. The Beatles are a fabulous band! 🎶🎸🎹
Yeah they're small or mostly or completely made up and the journalists are just being really disgusting doing this and yeah I guess it is probably the way to avoid talking about and having people know about allegations and other things going on
@@P3myY what are you talking about. the context of this video is that Kate is defined as a commoner. Real commoners can't even afford rent let alone to reproduce. Wat Tyler's Rebellion
@@beyondgenesis2954 Kate is not a commoner now..... but she was born and raised one. Commoner means without aristocratic inheritance titles not royal. Boris Johnson is a commoner.......I am....... I can't think of any other Brits at the moment who the US might know ................. Mike Tindall, Zara Phillips's husband is a commoner - even though his wife is a grandchild of the Queen. Zara has no titles neither does her brother, Peter. Princess Diana came from a very aristocratic family. - with a longer inheritance historical line than the royals. So, Diana was not a commoner.
The gull of Meghan who thinks she is an Angel sent by God to reform the Queen and the Royal Firm? It goes to show Meghan has a lot of delusional concept that she obviously does not live in this reality of this world.
"If you love her you don't have to hate me and if you love me you don't have to hate her." This sums up everything .We can uplift someone without pushing some one else down.
She comes from a wealthy family and she went to the same university as Prince William. Calling Kate a "commoner" is just a classic case of "old money" vs. "new money" elitism.
She's a "commoner" as in she's not independently titled. The British social class system is not necessarily linked to money. You are a commoner if you cannot sit in the House of Lords. Technically, even children of lords, themselves with a courtesy title could be called a commoner.
People seem to forget the Netflix series the crown is not factual, its imagination. They do not know what the Queen said to her children in private or her husband, sister, mother etc. It's simply a movie with some facts based on news articles of the time. In other words Chinese whispers.... please remember this
@@suzettelilly9462 and youtube, obviously you watch it, books also fictional just because there are books doesn't mean they are truth . Im mearly pointing out films or books are not necessarily the truth. Don't believe everything.
I have never heard of Chinese whispers. Are you being biased and made up your own Chinese idioms. More like being biased against the CHINESE Culture. Do you know how many years that CHINESE CULTURE EXIST LONG before the rest of the Western World evolved??
That was well said. That's why I wish that people would remember that when it comes to Meghan. No one really knows what really happened to her either, but yet she is ostracized like she has committed murder or something. The hatred directed towards her is just crazy. So I've chosen not to tear her down but lift her up in prayer. Most of the books that were written about Meghan were not authorized by her, yet people take them as fact and judge her for it. Why? Why the hatred?? It's just baffling to me.
@EZE I think because of certain things she said, for example, she got married 3 days before the wedding with just Harry and Archbishop. This could have led to him being incarcerated, out and out lie You need 2 witnesses by law. What did she gain from this. Nothing. Saying she only wore muted colours, she wore many strong colours, green, red, blue, etc. Mountbatten Music Festival, 2020, wore a beautiful red dress Homecoming Centre in Cape Town, 2019 light blue. Hamilton Square in Birkenhead, 2019 red and purple, like Diana. Canada House Commonwealth Day, 2019 Kelly Green. The list goes on Meghan said She wasn't allowed to leave the palace when pregnant. She has a baby shower in NY and travelled to many different places by private plane, New Zealand Tonga, Australia, Figi and Morocco to name a few. She didn't know she had to courtesy to HRH The Queen and didn't know how to. Yet she had done it before. She was wearing a cancel coloured coat and a tan hat, first Christmas in Sandringham before they we married. They were all about saving the planet, yet at the moment, they fly private. Saying about if they had a mixed race baby someone questioned it skin colour. This was purely to imply racism and start an argument. Very sad. These are many of the reasons people are not impressed I feel
Neither woman should be compared to Diana, not only because they're their own people, but because the circumstances to each of them entering the Royal Family were vastly different from Diana's. Diana was from a broken household and had barely entered adulthood by the time she entered the Royal Family. Mental health issues and eating disorders run in her family. She had a lot of healing that she needed, and instead basically entered into an arranged marriage. She was thrust into a stressful and demanding environment and she couldn't cope. Let the poor woman rest in peace.
I so agree with this comment. I will add that not only was it an arranged marriage, but it was also a loveless marriage. Charles never loved Diana. I always felt so bad for her because of that.
@@missmew3499 Did people in England know about Camilla then? I just had my first baby when Diana married and just loved the whole excitement of it all. Everyone in America fell in love with Diana. You know, at 60, you are still not "old". At least I'm not ha ha ha. I mean, at 60, Diana wd have the energy to fly to Montecito and straighten it all out. She wouldn't have let it gotten so far - she was protective of her sons. It's hard to read insults about her when she is not here to defend herself. It's lame gossiping about the deceased so glad you added the fact - Charles married her knowing he did not love her and how could he do that to such a young girl and one he didn't hate, he liked the Spencer family and there are times he did seem to be proud of her. In Australia when she talks about Williams favorite toys, he got a huge smile and giggle when she said "he loves his Koala and a little whale that blows balls out of its head!" It was endearing and Charles really seemed to love her at that time. Did he or was it all a show? I believe she wanted his love more than anything.
Niq Gee she had no attitude any educated person knows why she was brutally bullied by those damn British tabloids she should have sued hard too bad those tabloids are owned by the same family that denied her therapy
@@nix2747 She WAS welcomed by the people of the uk, we were shocked when she turned on us, but she needed an excuse to return to LA, so cried racism which wasn't true.
What? Meghan went to private school, her dad paid for her to go to a top College, she has always had a privileged life compared to most, she is certainly not self made, her upbringing is not too far from Kate’s, both middle class.
I feel like any woman the princes dated needed to be strong against the public. It was nasty what both went through. The media just wanted a story. Both are great in their own ways.
Plot twist: there is no feud except one small bit of drama that commonly happens when preparing for weddings and ended in a mature manner. Society and media made up everything else.
You know we're sick of this crap of Megan and Harry. It's just full lies and looking for sympathy. The playing the colour of each women. Is everyone lying about Megan being a bully., a yacht girl, a caddy girl. Kate maybe waited for William but Megan stepped her wy up.
@@locolocoseoul Wait What happen??? For what i heard, she only explain something that happen betwen the two of them and that the media decide to create a narratif where she was the one who made kate cry when it was the opposite. Did she said something else to make it seems like Kate was just awful??? For what i see, she only explain her side of a story that was twist by the media and give an example on how bias the media was against her. Basically she was talking on how bad the media was and not kate. But maybe i am wrong, so please explain it.
I remember when the British Press pitted Fergie against Diana in the 80s-90s and I hoped there wouldnt be a repeat when Meghan married but alas....no such luck.
It reminds me a lot of when Jennifer Lawrence and Anne Hathaway won their Oscars and how all comparisons between the two basically came down to telling women how they “should” be.
@@jessicavictoriacarrillo7254 yes! The Cool Girl can only exist without any context so she doesn’t make any choices you need to examine society’s role in/your role in perpetuating (Kate “going from bride to mother”) but also has no particular personality/opinions that you might disagree with (Meghan’s advocacy on race/gender).
Entertainment has always been fair-game for actors and actresses. However, the monarchy has been around for more than one hundred years and should know better about embracing new to the fold future princesses and duchesses which makes for feeling inadequate and not knowing how to fend for themselves without putting forth the effort by the experienced but resentful individuals that should set aside their feelings for the better of the monarchy.
I always thought it was unfair and callous for people to say that Kate waited on William just because she wanted to be 'Royal'...what about the revolutionary idea that she just really loved him and didn't want to let him go? Geez!
She was actually in love with some other guy before William but they claim Carol Middleton "plotted" to send Kate to the same college as William lol. Also didn't they break up and it was William who ment the relationship again after months?
@@afrinsayed5902 And they broke up for like a month and William couldn’t handle it and wanted her back . I think they’re a great couple and will last forever . I can’t stand Megain she’s trying to compare herself to Diana she’s nothing like Diana . Megain only cares about Megain . Harry’s gonna regret this all one day .
Anything too real is difficult for the BS media to digest they must make up stories to sell their crap. Obviously the guy was trying to be careful after his parents world wide divorce. He & Catherine lived together years before marriage just like many couples. 🙄🙄🙄
Can we not compare the three of them? Can't we just accept that they are all wildly different people, with different upbringings, and different experiences?
Absolutely true. They are incomparable, most ridiculous when Megan compares herself to Diana. All three have different upbringing, different experiences, different problems, and different personalities.
I agree with your comment. I’m not a Kate or Megan fan, but I can at least accept their differences. Each has a unique experiences to bring to the palace. I hate how they are unfairly compared.
In Diana's defense, Katherine was 10 years older and a college graduate when she married William. Kate had much more time to come into her own than did Diana at barely 19 when she married Charles.
And Kate was given so much time to prepare whereas Diana was thrown into job as soon as she married even Charles took her to stay in middle of nowhere, what 19 yr old could stand that
Kate also has a very supportive family. Sadly, Diana was needy and married into a family that is frosty, even to each other. She thought that the Queen would be a mother like figure but the Queen was not much of a mother figure to her own children. And the perfect prince was jealous and did not love her, and did not even realize that Diana was someone who needed to be loved. He thought she knew she was playing a role because she was from an old aristocrat family. Just a sad set of circumstances
@@machelb510 I'm gonna assume you meant the british media (pls correct me if I'm wrong). Every person that joins the royal family is a target - same thing happened with Diana or Kate, so I don't think she was attacked specifically because she is supposed to, according to some people, change the family.
Meghan herself boasted that she would modernise the Monarchy. The Monarchy changes as and when required. Britain and the Commonwealth decide when these changes occur. We do not need an ill educated arrogant outsider stirring the pot for their own aggrandisement.
The only thing that triggers me I think about this, is when they call it so very idiotically a "rags to riches" story, when her family was already extremely wealthy.
I would say Meghan got a bit of a culture shock, and then some. Anyone in her situation would. But you don't get to just wander into the British Royal family and think you're going to change a thousand years of tradition.
I think it's an interesting case study of an outdated institution in a supposedly evolved society. It's enlightening of how much institutions can persist and control lives even after declining in direct political power.
THANK you for digging up the crap Kate had to go thru. Everyone forgets this. The tabloids trashed her so much, those stories were everywhere for years, I remember. Even I had a skewed view of her until they got engaged.
People have short memories don't they? At least Kate didn't go to the world's leading controversial millionairess to air her dirty laundry to all! I know which lady I prefer & it is NOT Me-Again!
No one is saying kate never got it hard, the thing is every women who marries into the institution is protected by the firm and the bullying eventually stops, but the firm didn't do the same for Meghan
@@earthlingalienator4204 Not really. Kate was still slammed when she married William, because the press seemed to want to "punish" her for having the gall "to have ideas above her station" by marrying the Prince. It was only when Meghan became a more juicy/controversial/whatever target that the press hypocritically started acting like they liked Kate all along. That's how you stop them: either you become boring (which... considering that Kate DID do everything to become boring to get them to bugger off and that didn't work because shitheads buy tabloids for royal slamming), get the consumers to stop buying rags (yeah, not happening), or wait until the press finds some other poor soul to obsess about
It doesn't matter what these women do, they will always be chastised for their actions. Too common, too perfect, trying too hard, not trying hard enough, too doting, too distant, etc.
How about Meghan going public with private matter/issue? She wants it there and she is enjoying it...one of the characteristics of narcissists. A manipulator she is.
Initially this feud was to distract from the issues between the brothers. William wants to preserve the status quo, Harry wants to smash it. It's the brothers who are at odds, but the wives got the brunt of it because of course they did.
If that's true (I think its an oversimplification but based on truth) then that supports the idea that the two women would have differences of opinion, because each brother chose a wife who shares his ideology and supports him in achieving his goals. I know the press has beaten up the slightest hint of disagreement, because the controversy sells papers and has for a long time, to suggest that they can't handle holding different opinions like mature adults. But that these two women approach life differently is supported by the way Harry and William approach their lives differently.
William wants to modernise the royals and him and Kate are, they just understand that you have to do it slowly. Harry and William were working together on so many projects and charity work and with Kate they were winning over younger brits who were anti royal. Harry doesn’t want to smash the status quo, he understands it, respects it, but knows that it needs to change. All Harry and Meghan have done is help keep the royals as they are for longer. They have now closed ranks and have gone into protection mode.
@@melanietarlton9080 This "attack" on the princesses comes from a need to protect a system that has been toxic for years. They complained about Kate. As soon as they found another victim, Meghan, complain about her. Over trivial and meaningless things that don't even determine good leadership. Let's face it. This is more out of sport and jealousy, probably spun by other nobles who couldn't win over the princes, than some false concern for the throne. The tabloids and public didn't learn their lesson with Diana, and now want to drive someone else to the grave for sport.
Every time I see the footage of their engagement announcement, with Charles patting her shoulder as any one of us might pat a loving goofy labrador puppy ... my blood boils
Team Both because there is no competition between two very different women who are working to change the monarchy to become better than what it was. The media needs to learn to stop pitting women against each for pure entertainment value and actually report on real news that matter and are true
It's not just the media, imo. Meghan made an issue of who made whom cry during wedding preparations, perpetuating the rumors of a rivalry. Such a trivial incident. Not one worth "settling scores" over, *two* *years* *later* with Oprah.
@@FanyLI I agree that the media pits women against women to manufacture rivalries. They do the same with men. Thankfully, most of the public sees through it. I think it was destructive of Meghan to play into that rivalry narrative in terms of rehashing an incident between herself and Catherine, thus giving the incident merit and the headlines power. Nevertheless, she was spot on when she said, "So much of what I have seen play out is this idea of polarity where if you love me, you don't have to hate her. And if you love her, you don't need to hate me." 💯
G J I hate Meghan for the stupid things she says and does. I hate feminism, it is an outdated concept in the western world. We have equality, yet she carries on like women are so oppressed. She plays the race card at every opportunity, implying she thinks people actually notice or care that she is biracial. Most of all I hate her privileged word salad speech, trying to make herself sound educated when in reality she is speaking a lot of words and saying very little. And to throw both their families under the bus like that...well, I shudder to think how their children will turn out.
It's the same narrative about pitting women against each other. Divide and conquer. Nicki against cardi, Beyoncé against Rihanna, as if there were only place for one person. But thousands of men have been doing the same generic thing forever and no one questions the legitimacy of one based on the performance of other. This mindset is so ingrained in our misogynistic society and one of its ugliest forms is the Queen Bee Syndrome. And now that people feel pressured or the need to choose one and hate the other, it is becoming worse and worse. Skin color also have a huge impact on this battle. All of the women I mentioned are black. When you are black and a woman, it feels like there is only space for one. And society pits them against each other. With Meghan, being a woman of color and having to "compete" for people's affection against a white woman who, since she got married, embraced the traditional way of a woman and a royal, she didn't even have a chance. Also, for Kate, it's easy to embrace the institution. She can very easily fit in and if she plays along, the institution will benefit her. She doesn't really stand for anything (which is not a criticism, but she is the ideal woman who is there for her man and her family). The contrary to Meghan.
These attitudes also extend into everyday society and the workplace, especially in male dominated fields. There have been many times in school (I’m a Black woman) when this occurs and the entire class just surrounds the argument and revels in the chaos they want to indulge in.
@@kaitlnwhite6809 that's what The Queen Bee syndrome means and it is especially observed in work places. As a black women myself, I also felt that pressure to be the best woman and the best back woman (especially in male dominated places). But because I lack constitution for competition, I just did my job.
Queen Consort Catherine? I understood Queen Elizabeth said William would become King and Catherine would not have Queen Consort Title, but Queen Catherine and King William as co-titles ? Someone please clarify this 🙂! Thank you.
Trying to push a narrative of being "down-to-earth" and "self-made" while having privilege. A lot of the children of millionaries and billionaires have done this.
Seriously to the UK it is Upper Middle Class because they were "Self Made" and it is not inherited wealth. The Brits would consider someone with the same amount of money but from inherited wealth better than someone self made- Weird I know but it is how their class system works. The other thing I take issue with is that they say Catherine sat around all day as "Waity Katie" when she was actually employed in her parents business.
@@lordfreerealestate8302 many Millionaires and Billionaires have done it tough to get where they are. Not all born with a silver spoon in their mouth and maybe they have taught their kids that privilege can be here one minute gone the next.
What people don't realise is that Kate is not in this alone. Her mother and her sister have got her back - always. She often drops off her children to school (pre covid) and then goes to her sister's or her mother's house. During her first delivery, her sister made a fridge full of smoothies (raw) and got it delivered to Kate to eat while she dealt with having a baby. Her sister also advises her on exercise and diet, a fact which greatly influences Kate's life visibly. Not to mention all the talking that acts like therapy that the support of two women can bring, Kate has been taken care of every step of the way. Shes very lucky She's got such a supportive family.
@@jodjam I read articles about diet because Kate bounced back from each of her deliveries quite well and almost in record time. My focus was only on diet but I couldn't help but notice how much emotional support Kate receives from her family
I"m Team Both. They're both intelligent, beautiful and talented young women and I think it is a crying shame that the media insist on pitting them against each other.
Meghan Markle isn't intelligent. That interview with Oprah was a disaster and showed lack of foresight. Who would want to work with her now, when she trashes people publicly after having a falling out? She went on tv and made declarations that were easily debunked. That's not the mark of an intelligent woman.
That is not quite how it is or went. Megan had other ideas how the Monarchy should be ran. She was very upset when she found that Harry could never be King! She is one evil conniving manipulate. A big liar!
@@nanettegray9674 how tf would you even know that. All you read at the end of the day are tabloids and interviews you know NOTHING ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. I am not saying you need to love her but hating on someone whom you only from tv shows how immature you are,
The media loves to depict women as emotional and always fighting each other, especially over men. In reality, most of the famous "feuds" among famous women were invented by the media, and they were either close friends/colleagues who had one argument one time and made up, or they rarely interacted at all but happened to date the same man at one point or another. Which isn't to say rivalries can't exist, but there's a big difference between rivalries and feuds. Paramount and Warner Brothers have a rivalry as studios, but it isn't like Paramount is slashing the Warner Brothers' tires every Sunday. The same figures here. This is Kate and Meghan, not crips and bloods.
This is society. Women cannot exist on the same level. We have to constantly pit women against each other. That is so harmful and toxic. We should be uplifting each other and celebrating each other in all our successes and achievements. This is meant to be a sisterhood. The media just didn't want these two women to exist side by side so they latched on to one minor disagreement that was resolved quickly and privately and ran with that one incident and blew it up into a full on feud in order to villainise Meghan as this troublemaker and outsider who has only joined the family to stir the pot and the put Kate on the pedestal and framed her as this saintly, motherly figure who is the wronged one. They were both wronged in different ways. That needs to stop. Not just for Meghan and Kate but for all women. Stop creating these fake wars and pathetic feuds. Let women exist side by side in the same space/industry. We as women need to do all we can to keep uplifting one another. Remember, a true queen is one who fixes another queens crown, without ever telling her or the world that it was crooked.
your posting was BALSAM FOR MY SOUL ... as a european born and raised aristocrate having lived in the US for many years, REJECTION and JEALOUSY have been lifelong "friends" I could do without ...I am multitalented and am being shunned and rejected for THAT VERY REASON ... I am not bitter though because it is JESUS CHRIST who has made my life one of being loved with a constant flow of blessings that all of those who reject me are having to put with ... and rightfully so .. your posting was WONDERFULLY written .. THANK YOU :) .
This was less like a “feud” and more like two people being objectified and compared. Why must we put two bad bitches against each other? They’re both just trying to live their lives!
Kate is not a bad bitch, she's done noting to earn your hatred or anyone else. She was put in this situation and responded with silence, discretion and class.
@@mariasweeneyblanco I don’t hate her at all. The term “Bad Bitch” is a good thing in modern slang. It describes a person who is doing a extremely difficult task very well and with style.
I agree. Something very cold about Kate with her plastered on generalized smile that is exactly the same no matter what event she is at. And someone who became so reactionary when Meghan tried to comfort her with her “baby brain” comment. Lashing out like that shows her level of self importance. The queen would never have been so reactionary even if it was a little boundary crossing from a British perspective. Meghan suffered much much uglier criticisms than Kate ever did. Meghan’s genuinely easy manner was a threat to all of the royal family. They are all very stiff and lacking social ease.
@@Im_Julissa it's not the same thing... beeing able to control feelings usually means some level of maturity and reading the room. The wibe I'm getting from Kate is just cold, like there is nothing behind her smile and eyes...it gives me the creeps...
Ugh excuse me but Boleyn wasn't a commoner. Her father was Henry VIII's ambassador to France and his controller of the purse. Her grandfather was lord mayor of london,her mother of aristocratic blood and her uncle was the Duke of norfolk.
But compared to other marriages, like Henry and Catherine of Aragon, she wasn’t from a high royal background with the right name. Even though she was aristocratic, she was seen as a “commoner” by the people and other courtiers
So shocked to see Anne Boleyn and Kate having similiarities..I can say their patience for the crown.... Yet Anne Boleyn never tolerated Henry VIII's mistresses tho.
Let's be real-- no one wins in these situations. If a royal loved me, I'd say hell no. I don't want my personality altered or to tiptoe with the more silly rules.
Well, you have to observe a few rules in exchange of hundreds privileges. Seems a pretty good deal to me. Of course you have to get a certain amount of stamina and fascination for that world, in order to carry on.
not just that, is it ethical for me to marry into a family that has leeched off taxpayer money for soooo long? especially at a time when so many are suffering in the UK, and the NHS is underfunded?
Non-British people need to realise how classist the UK is. Even your accent alone will be judged, and to an extent, your family name too, depending on which circles you mingle with. That's why the nobility still exists here. There are people who still clench on traditions.
Lol how is that different to any other country? And it's WAY worse in China, Japan, India, the middle east etc. WAYY more, they are incredibly openly racist and classist. As if we all don't judge on how someone speaks, the dialect and if they SMELL of BO and cigarettes, and how they treat others etc..
China, Japan, India and middle east and far far farrrrrr more extreme about class and also, race to a huge extent. The UK is not that classist, not anymore than LA or new York, even less so, actually. You're just an imbecile.
I hear you Alistair but do Brits have to be evil? Why lie And hate indefinitely. Harry was a spare in the RF, he's gone away now with his hated wife And is no longer a spare but a valued father who earns for his living And doesn't benefit from the UK Taxpayers. Leave him and his wife alone. Focus on your Country affairs.
No one is Jealous of a Queen in waiting who is Only in that position because William was forced to marry her for an heir because no one else wanted that job. William wanted Isabella Calthorpe. Kate was jealous of Meghan's popularity, Beauty, and intelligence.
Harry revealed in his book that they were pissed when Charles told them he doesn't have as much money for them. Meghan wanted money and titles and she's dying of jealousy
The way some of those articles talk about Diana being human and showing emotion, as if its a bad thing, really drives home the insane amount of pressure on her at all times. Like she wasn't allowed to be a human with feelings. Even though its those very qualities that endeared her to the public. The poor woman. Diana's marriage, similar-yet-different to Britney's conservatorship, also showcases how a person can appear to have it all: looks, money, fame, global adoration, assistants, even living in a castle (or mansion, which is close enough to a castle for your average broke-ass like me)...they have everything, yet they have nothing and daydream what its like to live as we do because we have more freedom than we do. Wealth and fame can be just as much of a trap as poverty, just the wealthy aren't often met with as much sympathy from the lower income, as its easy for us non-wealthy to forget that money doesn't make everything better, money is simply something that we like having
Diana had lots of happy times, she made a role for herself, she was loved and adored, she did lots, she travelled the world, don't believe the hype, she had two beautiful sons, she adored them, they adored her. Prince Charles and her had their ups and downs to, it wasn't all bad they tried their best, marriages fail, they both made mistakes, Diana was sweet and beautiful, she glowed, I sat behind her at the ballet once, she glowed, I loved her, anyhow, we are still equal etc etc, I wear an imaginary queen crown and wave at myself in the mirror
The FEUD I want to see is BRITISH TABLOID MEDIA V. THE ROYAL FAMILY - cuz they’re the real culprits here, not two beautiful, intelligent women who are trying to raise a family and make the world a slightly better place in their own ways. 💥💥💥
Basically, Kate is being compared to Pré-Separation Lady Diana and Meghan is compared to Post-Separation and Divorced Lady Diana. That’s the definition of Double Standards.
Because it was only later that Diana started so blatantly virtue-signaling, trying to appear a victim, seeking publicity and giving interviews smearing other royals, as Meghan has done from the start. Kate has continued to be honest and proper in her dutiful role, as we hoped they all would be, and initially appeared to be.
Meghan is an asset for the RF. They refuse to acknowledge this. Her brilliance is one reason why the RF are, to put it mildly, upset with her! All the hostility is because she is biracial. The press have been encouraged to do a " hit job" on Megan.
I can't believe anyone could praise Kate composure compared to Diana without taking into account that one was 19 when she married a man a decade older that didn´t love her, whilst Kate married at 30, had been with the guy for years. As if life experience and maturity didn´t play a role.
Regardless of whether or not anyone agrees with the lifestyle of the Royal family or all of the strict royal rules of etiquette or the strange traditions that are in place; once you choose to become a member of the Royal family you are beholden to commit yourself to upholding and maintaining the traditions and rules that are set in place. Your obligation is to the Royal family first and foremost. You are expected to adhere to the rules and to learn the etiquette if you don't know what is expected of you. You can't come in & decide because you don't like something, you're going to just ignore it or change it. Doesn't work that way. Kate chose to go along and make the best of her chosen situation. Meghan didn't.
Shits boring at this point it more fun to see woman working together and supporting each other like the awesome ladies that make this amazing channel❤️
William and Harry love their wives. They have both tried to protect them from the press to the best of their abilities. Harry is freer and can at least remove his wife from the scene and have some privacy. As you said above, without Megan there for comparison, it'll die down. William and Kate are less free, but do their best. William and Harry may have argued about Harry's decision, but their relationship is very strong and they are both very mature. Yes, Harry is playful, but mature for all that. My one concern is that with the press's behaviour, the four of them may have very little time together in the future as everytime they make a move to meet up, the paparazzi will make a lot out of nothing, so they might stay apart in order to have some peace.
Yeah i was so confused when she said that because., like what.. Kate has really good bone structure. Most British people don’t really have the facial bone structure she does… maybe that’s why she is plain to them?
Yeah i was so confused when she said that because., like what.. Kate has really good bone structure. Most British people don’t really have the facial bone structure she does… maybe that’s why she is plain to them?
Kate is like Mary if Denmark. They both had time before marriage to get used to thier future role. Meghan' time to get used to the role was a lot shorter
you would think so, but TV/Hollywood fame and royalty fame can be different, plus there is a whole set of values your measured against that your just not in Hollywood.
@@tK-be6ns She advertized herself as humanitarian, activist and feminist. But she was not really mature, inteligent and well educated and now we see results.
To add, Kate grew up under the Crown, is used to the customs and mannerisms of the land, and can play her cards right as a result. An American fresh off the boat is going to have more faux pas when trying to adjust to a new culture, let alone a new marriage and family.
and MM did not use that time wisely. Mary of Denmark not only had to learn Royal Protocol she had to learn a whole new language. MeGain whinged that she had to learn to curtsey and whined that she was expected to learn the words to the British National Anthem.
I hated that the British press decided to pit kate and Meghan against each just like they did with princess diana and Sarah Ferguson the duchess of York making it look like there was this feud between them 😤🤯😬😠😡
@Janice Walls cause she was publicly and internationally made out to be a bully in a situation in which SHE was actually the victim. I think anyone would want to set the record straight in a situation like that, especially when you're already being vilified for no reason.
What about the victims of meghans bulling in the Palace? Who's going to speak for them? Two of those were so traumatised that had to have counselling! Harry asked the pr team to cover it up and the mistake that was made that they agreed to it, I think they were so worried about the fallout and the fact she was biracial they kept quiet! Meghan has always portrayed herself as a victim 🙄 there were 12 members of her staff that left in a short space of time, some had worked for the royal household for many years! I would have to ask myself why?
@@suegroizard415 lol you are so delusional you believe in the manufactured telenovela created by the media. Life is not a soap opera and we do not know them personally, this whole circus and the people who perpetuated it are the greatest example of human"s stupidity. And a by product of misogyny.
@@elananova Meghan is a victim of NOTHING. Why don't you talk about how she vilified the Royal family for NO reason after all they did for her and falsely accuse them of racism?. About the Kate incident, all witness that came forward after her allegations said the she was the one to make Kate cry and the reason her daughter, Princess Charlotte was never seen again at the fittings, she, the little girl, was the victim of bullying by Meghan, do a google search. I believe this to be true just by looking at her behavior with her own family, with P. Eugene, P. Beatrice, the six members of the Palace staff who QUIT to avoid dealing with her, not to mention the Oprah interview that had the sole intention to hurt the image of the Royal family. FYI since then 17 lies have been debunked which show her true character. She has not been vilified. She IS a bully.
The contrast between Diana's personality and Catherine's personality starts with Diana being the third of four living children and Catherine being the eldest. A similar contrast exists between William and his brother. Firstborn children, for the most part, tend to be more serious.
This one was so thoroughly researched. Thank you so much for all the hard work! As a person who avidly follows royal family news, I absolutely love this
The press is the cause of all these feuds! Both women are amazing 👏🏿 Princess Kate will be a great Queen someday and Meghan will succeed in all her endeavours. No need to pitch one against the other. They have different destinies in life.
Meghan is the one out there doing the pitching. All she has to do is shut up, get a job and get on with taking care of the kids she brought into the world.
Ahhh.. If you watch suit you would say that... Her character itself ia daughter of black father and white mother... And these days Hollywood usually cast someone from ethnic background same as character in movies/ series.. How you never know?
@@Rheawonder because it wasn't part of the story line. She was just an ambitious paralegal the show could push as a love interest. Her race had no impact on the plot.
Wrong.....Meghan thought she was going to go into the Royal family and change it all or modernized it. The Royal family is rooted in history and rituals that are not to be changed...period. Kate gets that Meghan doesn't. She cares about one thing....money. People have seen right through her and have seen her for what she is.....a fake, narcassitic, money hungry liar.
I think there's some tension, but I also think I lot of it is the media wanting to cause drama to get clicks. IMO Catherine is a team player, Meghan was just never going to be happy there. A lot of in-laws don't get along. One of my Aunts didn't speak to my Mother the first 3 years of my parents marriage.
Soo so true! And I'd even add that the real reasons why was never gonna fit in are really the reasons she was so much loved in the beginning, she's too modern (not that's bad) for an institution that takes very little doses of modernism, just to keep itself relevant. I mean it in the sense that if you're a modern woman and everything you are goes against the beliefs of the family you're marrying, you're going to find yourself disagreeing and having friction and on top of that the publicity on you it's going to make it ten times worst.
Can descipline be not applied to royals after all they have to learn what is right wrong from their parents the duchess is. Very intelligent and come from a respectable family.
@@nouchireiss2223 she only explain how the media was bias against her and are willing To create false narratif of anything that happen to her. She didnt trow anyone, except the media, under the bus in this situation. If anything, kate did by not defending or explaining the situation. Why blame the victim for coming foward and not the culprit meaning the media?
@@annjepsen1621 I am from the US. I'm also multicultural myself. I've also been to Britain and find it hard to believe they consider her "black." She's done her best to not look ethnic at all, in my opinion.
She's not a famous actress, she did have a part in one popular lawyer show and that's about it. Personally, I never liked her as an actress , but that's me. When she got engaged to that idiot royal, probably the lowest IQ of all royals, it looked like trouble from the get go. When she started to misbehave, she looked exactly like her dad, a bottom feeder. That woman is trouble and not in a good way. As for a comparison between the two women, they're in a different class altogether, as can be inferred from looking at their parents. Thankfully, nothing Markle produces now has any chance of registering in the UK. She's a pariah and so is her idiot husband.
Their mum would be so happy for them both. I hope both women love the boys until the end and I hope both boys don't follow in their fathers footsteps and stay faithful to their new and hopefully forever wives. God bless both couples.
This is so tiring, I mean do we really need to choose between two incredible women? I love Kate and I love Meghan so I don't know why should I choose when I can love both, we can Love Both😌🤷🏾♂️🤷🏼♂️ One thing that I love about them is the duality they represent: "The Player" and "The Game changer" and actually I love that duality why? Because I feel identified with Kate and at the same time I have Meghan as my aspiration to be. I just hate how people just want to compare them with everything they do, Diana was an individual, Kate is an individual and Meghan is an individual. So let's just not forget that
@@TheAmazingElexcia Kate ejected and expelled 3 kids in consecutive order every second year, to secure her Royal status after marriage. Kate Middleton hung around for 10 yrs. Any other woman in her right mind, dating courting a guy, would of said Good Bye long ago. It's so obvious how calculating Kate Middleton was, waiting and waiting, chasing Prince William, that he would propose, but he didn't ! He was sowing his wild oats with other beautiful women, when Kate wasn't looking. She was not William's 'first' choice ! William was in love with Rose Hanbury and still is. He had an affair with Rose Hanbury 2 y Kate Middleton has never forgiven William, but she's not going to divorce him! WHY? Because Kate Middleton wants to be queen consort. Yeah right, if that will ever happen !
Do you actually know either of them in real life to say this with such authority? The palace media machine has shaped what everyone thinks. Their job is only to protect the actual monarch and the heir (as long as heir doesn’t outshadow the monarch. The rest are there to feed the public’s low IQ desire for juicy gossip.
@@mekine45 Constitutional monarchies (such as The Netherlands, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Belgium) are often the most successful, free, and stable countries in their regions. Republics are prone to coups, dictatorships, and civil war. Not to mention our monarchy brings more revenue than it costs. Every family has its fair share of drama. Even political families. Clintons. Trumps. Kennedys. Would you rather we have President Boris who is most definitely not known for wasting taxpayer dollars having all the decision making powers? 🙄
The REAL problem here is the horrible british press, and taking their ideas and headlines as is they actually were the peoples' opinions. If people didn't give that much importance to all those horrible publications, they wouldn't be so powerful in defining history as they please.
I don't even like the royals and yet I get happy to see the four together. This "feud" thing is toxic inventions to hook people in gossip and forget the important things.
I didn't get happy because I knew it was contrived. it was tense and awkward and forced. What i want to see is the 4 of them sitting around a sofa-- each one of them apologizing for things that occurred, for statements made , for attitudes since, for snubs, for keeping their kids apart, for failing to see what really mattered, and for letting pride hold them back. There is an imbalance of power-- they are not the fab four-- and may never be because it's "us and them" and William gets to rule. An olive branch? To ride in a car, to walk around a memorial but never speak, never make eye contact? Nah. Seeing them together put me on edge.
Oh I think the feud is very real and it's made up of 4 egos, none of which will back down. William and Kate want an apology for the interview, Meghan and Harry want an apology for the initial unresolved problems. Has 4 crossed arms no eye contact and the silent treatment resolved anything? Nope? Give me the four of them in a backyard having dinner, laughing and joking while in the distance the 5 kids played together-- then I'll buy it.
@@deborahzawacki5809 there are problems, but they are reasonable people to an extent. Meghan showed sings of humility and nervousness and searched for cues in Will/Kate. William and Harry were showing politeness with William introducing Meghan for someone they knew as soon as they dropped off the car. Kate was stiff, but made space for the other couple in the same moment. Their body language was showing me that despite all, they do better than you might think due to headlines. I got happy to see them together exactly because in the end they have a "duty" and they need to work together and that was exactly what they were doing. It's like seeing children that fought and when distant, bad-mouth the other and revolved in the wounds, but then coming close under a summer camp, drop most of bad feelings in the hiking because they are in a situation where they need to support each other and only they could help one another. Sure would be nice to see everybody apologizing, even just for clearing the air, but we can't have it all. I do believe the closeness, even that "forced", brought a new light over their little "squabbles". And in the end, Meghan was asking people to not hate her if it happens that they liked Kate more and vice-versa. Is this all not proof that despite issues (who doesn't have them), most toxicity comes from media exploitation? It's how I see it.
@@hannahwebster5606 no they don‘t, especially not the private ones where kate and the prince went to. did u ever look up oxford? that‘s american college pay level
@@nyah.o.0355 Yeah, but they'll give literally anyone a student loan to pay for it though 🤷♀️ Keeps us all busy little worker bees for them once we've graduated (unless we plan to pull a prince at uni, that is).
Meghan is a barracuda and it's already been leaked by the Givenchy staff at the dress fitting that Meghan was bullying 3 year old Charlotte. Her and Jessica Mulroney were mean girling the 3 year old. Calling her fat and not as good as Mulroney's daughter. Absolutely foul. Kate does not have the nature to make anyone cry. You can see that by looking at her. Princess Pushy on the other hand.....
There is no feud. Sometimes...situations and people are just not important enough to pay attention to...especially when people without couth are involved. Ignoring is the best way to deal with ongoing pesky problems. When narcissists are involved the best response is "NO CONTACT" because they just never stop trying to create chaos.
Look what happened last time an American divorcée married into the Royal family. It's only going to end in tears. America don't get it. I don't get it BUT what I do get is America not understanding anything outside America.
There were so many stories saying that Megan is a narcissist taking Harry away from his family. As if his family isn't full of narcissists and toxic behavior!
_or Harry being a leech wanting to live off family money as an insult while dismissing the origin of sorts that is the rf income source_ _also that Harry should not be working [in such a capacity] nor be a supportive husband… because "attention" they give him means he agrees to harassment..?_
Get 4 Winc bottles for just $29! Plus, shipping is FREE too! Click www.trywinc.com/thetake Must be over 21. Please drink responsibly.
my goodness this video reminds me of the Wat Tyler's Rebellion. Peasants struggling to live while rich people get richer why dont u cover that
What a load of rubbish! Kate isn't interested in any attention just working Vs Harry's wife who couldn't handle the lack of attention and hard work. This is trash
@@nifflofair6685 Yes I have to agree. With you. Most Channels like this always Trashes Catherine. And Puts Meghan up on a Pedalstool.
Kate middleton le paillasson a maltraité et a traité Meghan comme un moins que rien car Meghan était plus populaire qu’elle.
Read The Tig blog on kate and williams royal wedding .... yes megans blog lolol she wrote about their wedding on her Tig channel xx
I find it hilarious that people portray Diana as being naive to royal protocol like she didn't grew up as daughter of one of the most important aristocratic families in UK
indeed, and on top of that they pretend like she didn't manipulate or call the press to make charles look like King Douchebag and her as the warm mother. Think these are the same people who also pull the "Meghan didn't know" card while there's over a dozen interviews of people saying she had a Diana crush as a teenager, read books about royals and visited buckingham palace. She'd heard of the monarchy and their kind of work, she was friends with eugenie ffs. It's different on the inside but both these women weren't as naive as they later pretended to be.
There's a huge amount of "everyone loves you when you're dead" around Diana since she died.
Diana and Kate have more British blood than the Royals. They are Germans. Changed their name during WW1.
@@bbe3034 They are descended from German royalty though, which again goes back into British- the Queen is a direct descendent of William the Conqueror. All European Royal lines are strongly mixed.
@@mankytoes The British RF is way less mixed that most monarchies though. From imported German King George back in 1714 they only married other Germans for more than century and a half, at least for the heirs. They only branched out to other countries after it became political suicide marrying a German, although Philip was quite German he could hide it with a Greek nationality. The Queen is more British than any reigning monarch for centuries, thanks to her mum.
But why is this the biggest royal family crisis in 85 years ? Did everyone already forgot about prince Andrew's scandal?
This "crisis" was carefully crafted to distract people from the Prince Andrew scandal
the press never cared about the Andrew scandal instead "scandals" were created about Meghan
They would rather forget because basically every powerful man in the world was involved in that.
@@afterlifeauthor My thoughts exactly. If they were going to talk about Prince Andrew, they'd also have to dig out all the other men (and women) too, and the system would probably collapse.
Disgustingly, yes. It was swept under the rug.
honestly the headlines criticizing Kate for re-wearing an outfit are OUTRAGEOUS. why should she wear a coat that was TAILORED to perfection just for her only once?!
For real!! People buy clothes because they like the clothes. It shouldn’t be so weird to wear it more than once. It should be the opposite. So wasteful.
If I like something I keep it and wear it forever, I have stuff from the 70s. It’s good for the planet too.
@@sandyno1089 your so right! why shouldn't wear her clothes more than once and have them retailored! It shows she is responsible and cares for the planet!
@@suegroizard415 Exactly.
While they complain about extravagance...
I'm happy to see that they are showing how the press were towards Kate and to bring this back into the spot light. This was at the begining of her relationship with Prince William especially the name calling etc etc from the press. It is easy for people to forget this or not even know what she went through herself. It is not easy being or becoming a princess it most definitely is not all fairy tales.
She had a choice. So did Megan. So…..
@phillychick4196 Yes AND they chose to be princesses, obviously. Kate which is her name not SHE, the difference being Kate is not a divorcee & dated William for a very long time before they married hence getting to know her spouse & future family which if course is The Royal Family only then could she learn & understand her place & responsibility within the Royal Family.
doctor did not order her to become a princess... and when you get into a job you just do it...
H drug brain and thin insecure skin couldn’t take it. Plus he was pushed by the wife so she could get back to her sunny LA which was always the plan.
Meagan markle ..she. Is simple nother and she forget the name of her mother in name .lilibeth Diana ..
basically this is just a classic case of the media pinning women against women.
Edit : ayo Y is my replies are fill with 2020 debate
I recently revealed the genders of my two girlfriends. It got a lot of hate and now has 30 times more dislikes than likes. I am really sad that people can be so mean. Sorry for using your comment to talk about my problems, dear yet
True, it just feels unnecessarily toxic to pit women against each other, for no real reason. What's wrong with them simply being friendly, and respecting the other?
@@trinaq hey! These seems funny but I always catch you in the takes comment section and other essayist (or movie based yt videos) comment section, I don't know what to say but to say it's cool seeing you reply my comment lol,
@@tia4337 Yep, it's my pleasure to reply to your comment. The Take is one of my favourite channels, and I adore your profile picture. The Beatles are a fabulous band! 🎶🎸🎹
Especially women of color as a threat to white women
In my opinion, they were done dirty in different ways and different times. These "feuds" are ridiculous.
Yeah they're small or mostly or completely made up and the journalists are just being really disgusting doing this and yeah I guess it is probably the way to avoid talking about and having people know about allegations and other things going on
what about the peasants who can barely afford to live.
@@beyondgenesis2954
What do you mean? How does that have anything to do with this??
@@P3myY what are you talking about. the context of this video is that Kate is defined as a commoner. Real commoners can't even afford rent let alone to reproduce. Wat Tyler's Rebellion
@@beyondgenesis2954 Kate is not a commoner now..... but she was born and raised one. Commoner means without aristocratic inheritance titles not royal. Boris Johnson is a commoner.......I am....... I can't think of any other Brits at the moment who the US might know ................. Mike Tindall, Zara Phillips's husband is a commoner - even though his wife is a grandchild of the Queen. Zara has no titles neither does her brother, Peter. Princess Diana came from a very aristocratic family. - with a longer inheritance historical line than the royals. So, Diana was not a commoner.
they treated Diana as a commoner even though she was brought up rich as well.
anyone who's not literally in the fucking royalty is a commoner to them, which is dumb, anything to drag outsiders down.
She was MORE than rich, She was from a long line of REAL british royals, unlike the Queen Elizabeth's one who's litterally german.
Diana is literally royal though
@@kimberleywilliams7802 American that does not understand their traditions should not come and change someone else's house.
@@dupelawal-ijaiya4020 Tell Harry not to criticize the First Amendment
How do you come to a family and then immediately want to change things and not expect antagonism?
The gull of Meghan who thinks she is an Angel sent by God to reform the Queen and the Royal Firm? It goes to show Meghan has a lot of delusional concept that she obviously does not live in this reality of this world.
because you are not smart
Especially when MM hadn’t studied up on the monarchy and was surprised about something as basic as having to curtsy to the Queen
You are a narcissist
"If you love her you don't have to hate me and if you love me you don't have to hate her." This sums up everything .We can uplift someone without pushing some one else down.
The media should be more concentrated on hating Andrew more. Talk about a real narcissist.
If Megan really believes this crap, there wouldn't be reason to even bring it up. Megan is toxic!
Even Meghan’s devoted fans don’t believe her because they continue to slag off Kate even tho their idol advised them no to
She had to throw her under the bus, tho
She does not actually believe that her actions say something else and the media and world see it. So they work with that.
if Kate is considered "commoner" I do not even want to know what they would call us regular girls xD
She comes from a wealthy family and she went to the same university as Prince William. Calling Kate a "commoner" is just a classic case of "old money" vs. "new money" elitism.
Peasants
@@ackermanlol you right
She's a "commoner" as in she's not independently titled. The British social class system is not necessarily linked to money. You are a commoner if you cannot sit in the House of Lords. Technically, even children of lords, themselves with a courtesy title could be called a commoner.
"Plebeians" sounds like a posh word "the elite" would use.
"thrifty" because she wears her outfit twice... In that case I am vegan because I sometimes eat vegetables😂
And I should get a noble prize for environmentalism for recycling aluminium cans and plastic bottles 🤭
@@alistairt7544 No actually, you should get a noble prize for you loud arrogance, that would fit you like a glove.
When Kate wears the same outfit again, she’s “thrifty”. When she wears a new dress, she’s “overspending taxpayers money”. She can never win
🤣🤣🤣
F, Zzzz
People seem to forget the Netflix series the crown is not factual, its imagination. They do not know what the Queen said to her children in private or her husband, sister, mother etc. It's simply a movie with some facts based on news articles of the time. In other words Chinese whispers.... please remember this
@@suzettelilly9462 and youtube, obviously you watch it, books also fictional just because there are books doesn't mean they are truth . Im mearly pointing out films or books are not necessarily the truth. Don't believe everything.
I have never heard of Chinese whispers. Are you being biased and made up your own Chinese idioms. More like being biased against the CHINESE Culture. Do you know how many years that CHINESE CULTURE EXIST LONG before the rest of the Western World evolved??
That was well said. That's why I wish that people would remember that when it comes to Meghan. No one really knows what really happened to her either, but yet she is ostracized like she has committed murder or something. The hatred directed towards her is just crazy. So I've chosen not to tear her down but lift her up in prayer. Most of the books that were written about Meghan were not authorized by her, yet people take them as fact and judge her for it. Why? Why the hatred?? It's just baffling to me.
@EZE I think because of certain things she said, for example, she got married 3 days before the wedding with just Harry and Archbishop. This could have led to him being incarcerated, out and out lie You need 2 witnesses by law. What did she gain from this. Nothing. Saying she only wore muted colours, she wore many strong colours, green, red, blue, etc. Mountbatten Music Festival, 2020, wore a beautiful red dress Homecoming Centre in Cape Town, 2019 light blue. Hamilton Square in Birkenhead, 2019 red and purple, like Diana. Canada House Commonwealth Day, 2019 Kelly Green. The list goes on
Meghan said She wasn't allowed to leave the palace when pregnant. She has a baby shower in NY and travelled to many different places by private plane, New Zealand Tonga, Australia, Figi and Morocco to name a few. She didn't know she had to courtesy to HRH The Queen and didn't know how to. Yet she had done it before. She was wearing a cancel coloured coat and a tan hat, first Christmas in Sandringham before they we married. They were all about saving the planet, yet at the moment, they fly private. Saying about if they had a mixed race baby someone questioned it skin colour. This was purely to imply racism and start an argument. Very sad. These are many of the reasons people are not impressed I feel
@@mckeon1960 So don't tear her down. Lift her up in prayer.
Neither woman should be compared to Diana, not only because they're their own people, but because the circumstances to each of them entering the Royal Family were vastly different from Diana's. Diana was from a broken household and had barely entered adulthood by the time she entered the Royal Family. Mental health issues and eating disorders run in her family. She had a lot of healing that she needed, and instead basically entered into an arranged marriage. She was thrust into a stressful and demanding environment and she couldn't cope. Let the poor woman rest in peace.
Also she was heavily crucified by the media then, it's insane what they did to her.
thank you
I so agree with this comment. I will add that not only was it an arranged marriage, but it was also a loveless marriage. Charles never loved Diana. I always felt so bad for her because of that.
@@missmew3499 Did people in England know about Camilla then? I just had my first baby when Diana married and just loved
the whole excitement of it all. Everyone in America fell in love with Diana. You know, at 60, you are still not "old". At least I'm not ha ha ha. I mean, at 60, Diana wd have the energy to fly to Montecito and straighten it all out. She wouldn't have let it gotten so far - she was protective of her sons. It's hard to read insults about her when she is not here to defend herself. It's lame gossiping about the deceased so glad you added the fact - Charles married her knowing he did not love her and how could he do that to such a young girl and one he didn't hate, he liked the Spencer family and there are times he did seem to be proud of her. In Australia when she talks about Williams favorite toys, he got a huge smile and giggle when she said "he loves his Koala and a little whale that blows balls out of its head!" It was endearing and Charles really seemed to love her at that time. Did he or was it all a show? I believe she wanted his love more than anything.
Chasity Boatman. Diana was used and mentally abused by Charles and the dysfunctional royal family. Shame on all of them.
These media headlines are honestly so gross
Frfrfrfrfrfrfrfr
Read the headlines and then remember the media narrative that Meghan was welcomed by the British public and it was her "attitude"... LOL
Niq Gee she had no attitude any educated person knows why she was brutally bullied by those damn British tabloids she should have sued hard too bad those tabloids are owned by the same family that denied her therapy
These headlines are just lies and rumors Just garbage
@@nix2747 She WAS welcomed by the people of the uk, we were shocked when she turned on us, but she needed an excuse to return to LA, so cried racism which wasn't true.
"Ultimate rags to riches, story." Imagine working hard to become millionaires and some guy on a talk show refer to your daughter as "rags".
Mmmmmm hmmm!
What? Meghan went to private school, her dad paid for her to go to a top College, she has always had a privileged life compared to most, she is certainly not self made, her upbringing is not too far from Kate’s, both middle class.
@@cloverite yup, this is just glossed over in this video.
@@cloverite true. and meghan's approval ratings are never mentioned.
this video reminds me of Wat Tyler's Rebellion
I feel like any woman the princes dated needed to be strong against the public. It was nasty what both went through. The media just wanted a story. Both are great in their own ways.
Thx u
Plot twist: there is no feud except one small bit of drama that commonly happens when preparing for weddings and ended in a mature manner. Society and media made up everything else.
Society, media AND MEGAN made up everything else
@@batia4718 huh?
Would have ended up in a mature manner... until meghan dicided to spill it out for all to see.
You know we're sick of this crap of Megan and Harry. It's just full lies and looking for sympathy. The playing the colour of each women. Is everyone lying about Megan being a bully., a yacht girl, a caddy girl. Kate maybe waited for William but Megan stepped her wy up.
@@locolocoseoul Wait What happen??? For what i heard, she only explain something that happen betwen the two of them and that the media decide to create a narratif where she was the one who made kate cry when it was the opposite. Did she said something else to make it seems like Kate was just awful??? For what i see, she only explain her side of a story that was twist by the media and give an example on how bias the media was against her. Basically she was talking on how bad the media was and not kate. But maybe i am wrong, so please explain it.
I remember when the British Press pitted Fergie against Diana in the 80s-90s and I hoped there wouldnt be a repeat when Meghan married but alas....no such luck.
Yeah, I was listening to You're wrong about's podcast about Di and was reminded of Kate and Meghan with Diana and Fergie.
Whenever I see Fergie I can only picture that low hairline singer from the Black Eye Peas...
Though they were good friend.
Yes but none was/is vicious lying destructive as this one 🙄
Are you seriously comparing her to Diana.
It reminds me a lot of when Jennifer Lawrence and Anne Hathaway won their Oscars and how all comparisons between the two basically came down to telling women how they “should” be.
reminds me of all the peasant rebellions in history.
The Cool Girl video
Jlaw didn't deserve her Oscar. It was emmanuelle riva or Naomi Watts
@@jessicavictoriacarrillo7254 yes! The Cool Girl can only exist without any context so she doesn’t make any choices you need to examine society’s role in/your role in perpetuating (Kate “going from bride to mother”) but also has no particular personality/opinions that you might disagree with (Meghan’s advocacy on race/gender).
Entertainment has always been fair-game for actors and actresses. However, the monarchy has been around for more than one hundred years and should know better about embracing new to the fold future princesses and duchesses which makes for feeling inadequate and not knowing how to fend for themselves without putting forth the effort by the experienced but resentful individuals that should set aside their feelings for the better of the monarchy.
Good Lord! These women can’t win in the press. All of them are brave and strong!
definitely, women are just broken down. Men probably not.
Meghan is a scheming plotting diabolical human being. She wants one thing the cameras attention while Kate is classy kind charming. We love Kate
Except Megain who came in the Royals with an agenda. She didn't have any strength she is a money hunger bitch
I din't know that introverts are not sexual.
Same here, guess I’m not as introverted as I thought! Jk
Kate is sexier.
It's the Boomer-Karen belief system.
😆😆😆 right?? Like we're people that like to hang out with one person all the time. We are extremely intimate lol.
lolol
I always thought it was unfair and callous for people to say that Kate waited on William just because she wanted to be 'Royal'...what about the revolutionary idea that she just really loved him and didn't want to let him go? Geez!
She was actually in love with some other guy before William but they claim Carol Middleton "plotted" to send Kate to the same college as William lol. Also didn't they break up and it was William who ment the relationship again after months?
@@afrinsayed5902 And they broke up for like a month and William couldn’t handle it and wanted her back . I think they’re a great couple and will last forever . I can’t stand Megain she’s trying to compare herself to Diana she’s nothing like Diana . Megain only cares about Megain . Harry’s gonna regret this all one day .
Anything too real is difficult for the BS media to digest they must make up stories to sell their crap. Obviously the guy was trying to be careful after his parents world wide divorce. He & Catherine lived together years before marriage just like many couples. 🙄🙄🙄
How she followed him was wierd.
@@janieleishman9130 Agree 100 percent!
Can we not compare the three of them? Can't we just accept that they are all wildly different people, with different upbringings, and different experiences?
Absolutely true. They are incomparable, most ridiculous when Megan compares herself to Diana. All three have different upbringing, different experiences, different problems, and different personalities.
I agree with your comment. I’m not a Kate or Megan fan, but I can at least accept their differences. Each has a unique experiences to bring to the palace. I hate how they are unfairly compared.
And different honesty levels.
I like Kate and think they will make a great future king and queen together.
In Diana's defense, Katherine was 10 years older and a college graduate when she married William. Kate had much more time to come into her own than did Diana at barely 19 when she married Charles.
Well said
Plus the fact that Diana's husband didn't love her or respect her and was CHEATING on her. The opposite of William's treatment of his own wife.
And Kate was given so much time to prepare whereas Diana was thrown into job as soon as she married even Charles took her to stay in middle of nowhere, what 19 yr old could stand that
Kate also has a very supportive family. Sadly, Diana was needy and married into a family that is frosty, even to each other. She thought that the Queen would be a mother like figure but the Queen was not much of a mother figure to her own children. And the perfect prince was jealous and did not love her, and did not even realize that Diana was someone who needed to be loved. He thought she knew she was playing a role because she was from an old aristocrat family. Just a sad set of circumstances
True..
IMO the idea that Meghan would push the monarchy to the 21st century was an American thing. Never seen that expressed in the UK or the rest of Europe.
Really? Then why did they try so hard to destroy her?
@@machelb510 racism for headlines $$
@@machelb510 I'm gonna assume you meant the british media (pls correct me if I'm wrong). Every person that joins the royal family is a target - same thing happened with Diana or Kate, so I don't think she was attacked specifically because she is supposed to, according to some people, change the family.
@@ackermanlol o please she was, both the palaces and press went after her, cause they were afraid she would be the next Diana.
Meghan herself boasted that she would modernise the Monarchy.
The Monarchy changes as and when required.
Britain and the Commonwealth decide when these changes occur. We do not need an ill educated arrogant outsider stirring the pot for their own aggrandisement.
The only thing that triggers me I think about this, is when they call it so very idiotically a "rags to riches" story, when her family was already extremely wealthy.
literally riches to bigger riches
They are refering to the "family", the Lineage
I would say Meghan got a bit of a culture shock, and then some. Anyone in her situation would. But you don't get to just wander into the British Royal family and think you're going to change a thousand years of tradition.
Well Laird John, if Meghan "wandered" into the so-called royal family, then Kate "slept" her way into it!
Probably
I agree what a deluded American she is. Ridiculous.
Maybe she just didn’t want it to change HER…? 🤔
100% Agree. I am glad she wasnt able to change their tradition. Sorry sweetie we're British this is how we roll.....
Team Neither. Obsessing over the Royals is crazy
I feel the same way, but here we are watching a video about them 😆
It sells. Anything about the RF sells.
It is. I only know about this because I am bored.
H O N E S T L Y
I think it's an interesting case study of an outdated institution in a supposedly evolved society. It's enlightening of how much institutions can persist and control lives even after declining in direct political power.
THANK you for digging up the crap Kate had to go thru. Everyone forgets this. The tabloids trashed her so much, those stories were everywhere for years, I remember. Even I had a skewed view of her until they got engaged.
I just turned 27 and remember it vividly. Especially the clubbing fotos. It always seemed they tried to shoot up her skirt.
People have short memories don't they? At least Kate didn't go to the world's leading controversial millionairess to air her dirty laundry to all! I know which lady I prefer & it is NOT Me-Again!
No one is saying kate never got it hard, the thing is every women who marries into the institution is protected by the firm and the bullying eventually stops, but the firm didn't do the same for Meghan
@@earthlingalienator4204 but didnt Kate get slammed for a longer period of time than Meghan?
@@earthlingalienator4204 Not really. Kate was still slammed when she married William, because the press seemed to want to "punish" her for having the gall "to have ideas above her station" by marrying the Prince.
It was only when Meghan became a more juicy/controversial/whatever target that the press hypocritically started acting like they liked Kate all along.
That's how you stop them: either you become boring (which... considering that Kate DID do everything to become boring to get them to bugger off and that didn't work because shitheads buy tabloids for royal slamming), get the consumers to stop buying rags (yeah, not happening), or wait until the press finds some other poor soul to obsess about
It doesn't matter what these women do, they will always be chastised for their actions. Too common, too perfect, trying too hard, not trying hard enough, too doting, too distant, etc.
Megan is her own worst enemy.
Broke: Kate vs. Meghan
Woke: the Daily Mail will do anything to manufacture controversy and keep the lights on
That's what media does.
How about Meghan going public with private matter/issue? She wants it there and she is enjoying it...one of the characteristics of narcissists. A manipulator she is.
@@lisasmith2724 true, but the Daily Mail almost turns it into an artform. They have a rep of being particularly vicious.
@@dupelawal-ijaiya4020 those are not characteristics of a narcissist, celebrities do this all the time
@@dupelawal-ijaiya4020 is she only the manipulator? Or ....
they act like having a picture of William on her wall was shocking. I definitely had one! we all thought he was dreamy in the 90s lol
@@RedShoes29 LMAO
@@RedShoes29 You don't need hair to be sexy if you are a man. (i am not one in spite of my name!)
@@maxthecat14 then you must be a cat
They say that because it makes her appear scheming and planning towards the goal of marrying into the royal family
@@WA-pd2cc Not necessarily.
Initially this feud was to distract from the issues between the brothers. William wants to preserve the status quo, Harry wants to smash it. It's the brothers who are at odds, but the wives got the brunt of it because of course they did.
Exactly!!!
If that's true (I think its an oversimplification but based on truth) then that supports the idea that the two women would have differences of opinion, because each brother chose a wife who shares his ideology and supports him in achieving his goals.
I know the press has beaten up the slightest hint of disagreement, because the controversy sells papers and has for a long time, to suggest that they can't handle holding different opinions like mature adults. But that these two women approach life differently is supported by the way Harry and William approach their lives differently.
William wants to modernise the royals and him and Kate are, they just understand that you have to do it slowly. Harry and William were working together on so many projects and charity work and with Kate they were winning over younger brits who were anti royal. Harry doesn’t want to smash the status quo, he understands it, respects it, but knows that it needs to change. All Harry and Meghan have done is help keep the royals as they are for longer. They have now closed ranks and have gone into protection mode.
@@melanietarlton9080 This "attack" on the princesses comes from a need to protect a system that has been toxic for years. They complained about Kate. As soon as they found another victim, Meghan, complain about her. Over trivial and meaningless things that don't even determine good leadership. Let's face it. This is more out of sport and jealousy, probably spun by other nobles who couldn't win over the princes, than some false concern for the throne. The tabloids and public didn't learn their lesson with Diana, and now want to drive someone else to the grave for sport.
@LoveConquers Oh does William yell at his wife and carry out with several women? I had no idea. Please give us some links
Every time I see the footage of their engagement announcement, with Charles patting her shoulder as any one of us might pat a loving goofy labrador puppy ... my blood boils
Team Both because there is no competition between two very different women who are working to change the monarchy to become better than what it was. The media needs to learn to stop pitting women against each for pure entertainment value and actually report on real news that matter and are true
It's not just the media, imo. Meghan made an issue of who made whom cry during wedding preparations, perpetuating the rumors of a rivalry. Such a trivial incident. Not one worth "settling scores" over, *two* *years* *later* with Oprah.
@@gj1695 your lack of self awareness is astounding
@@FanyLI I agree that the media pits women against women to manufacture rivalries. They do the same with men. Thankfully, most of the public sees through it. I think it was destructive of Meghan to play into that rivalry narrative in terms of rehashing an incident between herself and Catherine, thus giving the incident merit and the headlines power. Nevertheless, she was spot on when she said, "So much of what I have seen play out is this idea of polarity where if you love me, you don't have to hate her. And if you love her, you don't need to hate me." 💯
G J I hate Meghan for the stupid things she says and does. I hate feminism, it is an outdated concept in the western world. We have equality, yet she carries on like women are so oppressed. She plays the race card at every opportunity, implying she thinks people actually notice or care that she is biracial. Most of all I hate her privileged word salad speech, trying to make herself sound educated when in reality she is speaking a lot of words and saying very little. And to throw both their families under the bus like that...well, I shudder to think how their children will turn out.
@@emusaurus so you hate a woman you don't know just beacuse she is outspoken and loud about her beliefs
You don’t realise how deeply classist England (London even) is until you leave😭 you look back like wawU
It's the same narrative about pitting women against each other. Divide and conquer. Nicki against cardi, Beyoncé against Rihanna, as if there were only place for one person. But thousands of men have been doing the same generic thing forever and no one questions the legitimacy of one based on the performance of other. This mindset is so ingrained in our misogynistic society and one of its ugliest forms is the Queen Bee Syndrome. And now that people feel pressured or the need to choose one and hate the other, it is becoming worse and worse.
Skin color also have a huge impact on this battle. All of the women I mentioned are black. When you are black and a woman, it feels like there is only space for one. And society pits them against each other. With Meghan, being a woman of color and having to "compete" for people's affection against a white woman who, since she got married, embraced the traditional way of a woman and a royal, she didn't even have a chance.
Also, for Kate, it's easy to embrace the institution. She can very easily fit in and if she plays along, the institution will benefit her. She doesn't really stand for anything (which is not a criticism, but she is the ideal woman who is there for her man and her family). The contrary to Meghan.
These attitudes also extend into everyday society and the workplace, especially in male dominated fields. There have been many times in school (I’m a Black woman) when this occurs and the entire class just surrounds the argument and revels in the chaos they want to indulge in.
@@kaitlnwhite6809 that's what The Queen Bee syndrome means and it is especially observed in work places. As a black women myself, I also felt that pressure to be the best woman and the best back woman (especially in male dominated places). But because I lack constitution for competition, I just did my job.
one correction I have to point out tho, Cardi B is not black, nor does she identify as such.
Omg, now it's the patriarchy again. Men and women are different.
@@lisasmith2724 I think you are lost.
I can't wait to see Princess Katherine as Queen Consort. She's beautiful inside and out. ❤❤❤❤
Queen Consort Catherine? I understood Queen Elizabeth said William would become King and Catherine would not have
Queen Consort Title, but Queen Catherine and King William as co-titles ? Someone please clarify this 🙂! Thank you.
Good Lord, since when is having millionaires as parents considered middle class?
Trying to push a narrative of being "down-to-earth" and "self-made" while having privilege. A lot of the children of millionaries and billionaires have done this.
Seriously to the UK it is Upper Middle Class because they were "Self Made" and it is not inherited wealth. The Brits would consider someone with the same amount of money but from inherited wealth better than someone self made- Weird I know but it is how their class system works. The other thing I take issue with is that they say Catherine sat around all day as "Waity Katie" when she was actually employed in her parents business.
@@katbar6066 she was also a buyer for a high street clothes shop,
@@lordfreerealestate8302 many Millionaires and Billionaires have done it tough to get where they are. Not all born with a silver spoon in their mouth and maybe they have taught their kids that privilege can be here one minute gone the next.
seriously, Britain is such a strange country lol
What people don't realise is that Kate is not in this alone. Her mother and her sister have got her back - always. She often drops off her children to school (pre covid) and then goes to her sister's or her mother's house. During her first delivery, her sister made a fridge full of smoothies (raw) and got it delivered to Kate to eat while she dealt with having a baby. Her sister also advises her on exercise and diet, a fact which greatly influences Kate's life visibly. Not to mention all the talking that acts like therapy that the support of two women can bring, Kate has been taken care of every step of the way. Shes very lucky She's got such a supportive family.
No hate but how do you know all this?
@@jodjam (s)he doesn’t
What is your point? And who gives a damn!!!
Do reply to the questions asked of you. It would be interesting to know more about the fridge full of smoothies 😄
@@jodjam I read articles about diet because Kate bounced back from each of her deliveries quite well and almost in record time. My focus was only on diet but I couldn't help but notice how much emotional support Kate receives from her family
I"m Team Both. They're both intelligent, beautiful and talented young women and I think it is a crying shame that the media insist on pitting them against each other.
Markle is a scheming liar. It's very obvious, and she plays the race card at any opportunity.
Meghan Markle isn't intelligent. That interview with Oprah was a disaster and showed lack of foresight. Who would want to work with her now, when she trashes people publicly after having a falling out? She went on tv and made declarations that were easily debunked. That's not the mark of an intelligent woman.
That is not quite how it is or went. Megan had other ideas how the Monarchy should be ran. She was very upset when she found that Harry could never be King! She is one evil conniving manipulate. A big liar!
@@vittoriacolona are those debukers the royal commentators? Man, that was quite the riot.
@@nanettegray9674 how tf would you even know that. All you read at the end of the day are tabloids and interviews you know NOTHING ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. I am not saying you need to love her but hating on someone whom you only from tv shows how immature you are,
Kate is treated with respect and love from her husband!
That will let a woman grow personally and publicly in many ways.
The media loves to depict women as emotional and always fighting each other, especially over men. In reality, most of the famous "feuds" among famous women were invented by the media, and they were either close friends/colleagues who had one argument one time and made up, or they rarely interacted at all but happened to date the same man at one point or another.
Which isn't to say rivalries can't exist, but there's a big difference between rivalries and feuds. Paramount and Warner Brothers have a rivalry as studios, but it isn't like Paramount is slashing the Warner Brothers' tires every Sunday. The same figures here. This is Kate and Meghan, not crips and bloods.
It's so tasteless and a symptom of lazy journalism
It is so sad that the two brothers are alienated for whatever reason .
This is society. Women cannot exist on the same level. We have to constantly pit women against each other. That is so harmful and toxic. We should be uplifting each other and celebrating each other in all our successes and achievements. This is meant to be a sisterhood. The media just didn't want these two women to exist side by side so they latched on to one minor disagreement that was resolved quickly and privately and ran with that one incident and blew it up into a full on feud in order to villainise Meghan as this troublemaker and outsider who has only joined the family to stir the pot and the put Kate on the pedestal and framed her as this saintly, motherly figure who is the wronged one. They were both wronged in different ways. That needs to stop. Not just for Meghan and Kate but for all women. Stop creating these fake wars and pathetic feuds. Let women exist side by side in the same space/industry. We as women need to do all we can to keep uplifting one another. Remember, a true queen is one who fixes another queens crown, without ever telling her or the world that it was crooked.
M8
Talk as a true queen
18:38
Nothing to do with crackpot feminism. Markle has run roughshod over people her whole life. Divorcee etc etc. She's a classic narcissist.
your posting was BALSAM FOR MY SOUL ... as a european born and raised aristocrate having lived in the US for many years, REJECTION and JEALOUSY have been lifelong "friends" I could do without ...I am multitalented and am being shunned and rejected for THAT VERY REASON ... I am not bitter though because it is JESUS CHRIST who has made my life one of being loved with a constant flow of blessings that all of those who reject me are having to put with ... and rightfully so .. your posting was WONDERFULLY written .. THANK YOU :) .
This was less like a “feud” and more like two people being objectified and compared. Why must we put two bad bitches against each other? They’re both just trying to live their lives!
Kate is not a bad bitch, she's done noting to earn your hatred or anyone else.
She was put in this situation and responded with silence, discretion and class.
@@mariasweeneyblanco I don’t hate her at all. The term “Bad Bitch” is a good thing in modern slang. It describes a person who is doing a extremely difficult task very well and with style.
@@mariasweeneyblanco "bad bitch", "baddie", "boss bitch," etc are compliments
😂😂😂 I came here to look for someone not understanding the term bad bitch and I found it. Very funny
@@wickedamoeba8719 Personally I prefer Bad Ass Bitch but that's just me.
Kate isn’t vanilla she’s got CLASS. 💗
Kate is cold and creepy.
NOW THAT WAS A*R*A*C*I*S*T COMMENT YOU A** HOLE.
I agree. Something very cold about Kate with her plastered on generalized smile that is exactly the same no matter what event she is at. And someone who became so reactionary when Meghan tried to comfort her with her “baby brain” comment. Lashing out like that shows her level of self importance. The queen would never have been so reactionary even if it was a little boundary crossing from a British perspective. Meghan suffered much much uglier criticisms than Kate ever did. Meghan’s genuinely easy manner was a threat to all of the royal family. They are all very stiff and lacking social ease.
@@leogirl6695 so am I therefore I know how it’s like. People who can control their feelings aren’t cold but seem like to bothersome to others.
@@Im_Julissa it's not the same thing... beeing able to control feelings usually means some level of maturity and reading the room. The wibe I'm getting from Kate is just cold, like there is nothing behind her smile and eyes...it gives me the creeps...
Ugh excuse me but Boleyn wasn't a commoner. Her father was Henry VIII's ambassador to France and his controller of the purse. Her grandfather was lord mayor of london,her mother of aristocratic blood and her uncle was the Duke of norfolk.
Aldo grand daughther of the 2nd Duke of Norfolk
But compared to other marriages, like Henry and Catherine of Aragon, she wasn’t from a high royal background with the right name. Even though she was aristocratic, she was seen as a “commoner” by the people and other courtiers
@@laraeverdeen3544 none of Henry's wives were royal except Katherine. But to call anycommoners is fundamentally wrong.
So shocked to see Anne Boleyn and Kate having similiarities..I can say their patience for the crown.... Yet Anne Boleyn never tolerated Henry VIII's mistresses tho.
Let's be real-- no one wins in these situations. If a royal loved me, I'd say hell no. I don't want my personality altered or to tiptoe with the more silly rules.
Agreed. 👍
Well, you have to observe a few rules in exchange of hundreds privileges. Seems a pretty good deal to me. Of course you have to get a certain amount of stamina and fascination for that world, in order to carry on.
Yes, you would.
@@katemaloney4296 Based on what?
not just that, is it ethical for me to marry into a family that has leeched off taxpayer money for soooo long? especially at a time when so many are suffering in the UK, and the NHS is underfunded?
Non-British people need to realise how classist the UK is. Even your accent alone will be judged, and to an extent, your family name too, depending on which circles you mingle with. That's why the nobility still exists here. There are people who still clench on traditions.
Lol how is that different to any other country? And it's WAY worse in China, Japan, India, the middle east etc. WAYY more, they are incredibly openly racist and classist. As if we all don't judge on how someone speaks, the dialect and if they SMELL of BO and cigarettes, and how they treat others etc..
China, Japan, India and middle east and far far farrrrrr more extreme about class and also, race to a huge extent. The UK is not that classist, not anymore than LA or new York, even less so, actually. You're just an imbecile.
It's no different from anywhere else.😂🤣😂
Every place has racist people tbh.
I hear you Alistair but do Brits have to be evil? Why lie And hate indefinitely. Harry was a spare in the RF, he's gone away now with his hated wife And is no longer a spare but a valued father who earns for his living And doesn't benefit from the UK Taxpayers. Leave him and his wife alone. Focus on your Country affairs.
Kate is the beautiful queen in waiting. Easy to be jealous of. Princess is perfect
No one is Jealous of a Queen in waiting who is Only in that position because William was forced to marry her for an heir because no one else wanted that job. William wanted Isabella Calthorpe. Kate was jealous of Meghan's popularity, Beauty, and intelligence.
Being an old fashion mute isn't perfect. Your self-esteem is in the basement.
Harry revealed in his book that they were pissed when Charles told them he doesn't have as much money for them. Meghan wanted money and titles and she's dying of jealousy
The way some of those articles talk about Diana being human and showing emotion, as if its a bad thing, really drives home the insane amount of pressure on her at all times. Like she wasn't allowed to be a human with feelings. Even though its those very qualities that endeared her to the public. The poor woman.
Diana's marriage, similar-yet-different to Britney's conservatorship, also showcases how a person can appear to have it all: looks, money, fame, global adoration, assistants, even living in a castle (or mansion, which is close enough to a castle for your average broke-ass like me)...they have everything, yet they have nothing and daydream what its like to live as we do because we have more freedom than we do. Wealth and fame can be just as much of a trap as poverty, just the wealthy aren't often met with as much sympathy from the lower income, as its easy for us non-wealthy to forget that money doesn't make everything better, money is simply something that we like having
Diana had lots of happy times, she made a role for herself, she was loved and adored, she did lots, she travelled the world, don't believe the hype, she had two beautiful sons, she adored them, they adored her. Prince Charles and her had their ups and downs to, it wasn't all bad they tried their best, marriages fail, they both made mistakes, Diana was sweet and beautiful, she glowed, I sat behind her at the ballet once, she glowed, I loved her, anyhow, we are still equal etc etc, I wear an imaginary queen crown and wave at myself in the mirror
Pppp
I’m not gonna make it work tomorrow or Tuesday or Wednesday 😮
WELL SAID I APPLAUD Y👍
The FEUD I want to see is BRITISH TABLOID MEDIA V. THE ROYAL FAMILY - cuz they’re the real culprits here, not two beautiful, intelligent women who are trying to raise a family and make the world a slightly better place in their own ways. 💥💥💥
The Royal Family HATES the British tabloids because they know where the bodies are buried.
@@andreaoreill They are incredibly ruthless and clever as well. Brilliant at self preservation.
You mean BRITISH TABLOID MEDIA AND THE ROYAL FAMILY? Cause they definitely work together
@@monicacreator3168 absolutely! Hence I'd like to see them go at it for a change - I mean just imagine ALL the tea 🍵 they could spill on eachother!
👍
Omg classism in English society, wow.
Like wow so groundbreaking 😂
It's no wonder the Welsh and Scotts hate the English
@@zurzakne-etra7069 you don't know much about history if you believe thats why they are hated lol. Ireland and scotland had/have peerage aswell.
@@evacope1718 The comment you're replying to is completely nonsensical, I don't think they know what kingdoms the United Kingdom is referring to...
😫😫🤣🤣🤣🤣
No feud. Just Megan’s behavior.
Basically, Kate is being compared to Pré-Separation Lady Diana and Meghan is compared to Post-Separation and Divorced Lady Diana. That’s the definition of Double Standards.
Because it was only later that Diana started so blatantly virtue-signaling, trying to appear a victim, seeking publicity and giving interviews smearing other royals, as Meghan has done from the start. Kate has continued to be honest and proper in her dutiful role, as we hoped they all would be, and initially appeared to be.
I really think that the Duchess of Cambridge is a lovely woman who adds much to the RF.
Meghan is an asset for the RF. They refuse to acknowledge this. Her brilliance is one reason why the RF are, to put it mildly, upset with her! All the hostility is because she is biracial. The press have been encouraged to do a " hit job" on Megan.
I can't believe anyone could praise Kate composure compared to Diana without taking into account that one was 19 when she married a man a decade older that didn´t love her, whilst Kate married at 30, had been with the guy for years. As if life experience and maturity didn´t play a role.
Diana married a man she didn't love either. It was an arranged marriage on both sides.
Well said!
"FACT".and what has happened to individuality??Tell me.Why is this shitty comparison of individuals which are soo so unique.
@@aaravs338 Indeed!
Regardless of whether or not anyone agrees with the lifestyle of the Royal family or all of the strict royal rules of etiquette or the strange traditions that are in place; once you choose to become a member of the Royal family you are beholden to commit yourself to upholding and maintaining the traditions and rules that are set in place. Your obligation is to the Royal family first and foremost. You are expected to adhere to the rules and to learn the etiquette if you don't know what is expected of you. You can't come in & decide because you don't like something, you're going to just ignore it or change it. Doesn't work that way. Kate chose to go along and make the best of her chosen situation. Meghan didn't.
Shits boring at this point it more fun to see woman working together and supporting each other like the awesome ladies that make this amazing channel❤️
William and Harry love their wives. They have both tried to protect them from the press to the best of their abilities. Harry is freer and can at least remove his wife from the scene and have some privacy. As you said above, without Megan there for comparison, it'll die down. William and Kate are less free, but do their best. William and Harry may have argued about Harry's decision, but their relationship is very strong and they are both very mature. Yes, Harry is playful, but mature for all that. My one concern is that with the press's behaviour, the four of them may have very little time together in the future as everytime they make a move to meet up, the paparazzi will make a lot out of nothing, so they might stay apart in order to have some peace.
Team Both!!!
I agree, why pick sides when you can easily choose both?! ❤️
Both?
Both.
Both is good.
Me too!
As Catherine's uncle said she was born to be queen
😂 What an arrogant uncle she must have. As if he held that omniscient key for 40 years. Preposterous!
Lol
The Woman calling Kate “Plain Jane” hasn't got the looks she does, is clearly jealous, and projecting.
Yeah i was so confused when she said that because., like what.. Kate has really good bone structure. Most British people don’t really have the facial bone structure she does… maybe that’s why she is plain to them?
Yeah i was so confused when she said that because., like what.. Kate has really good bone structure. Most British people don’t really have the facial bone structure she does… maybe that’s why she is plain to them?
Its all black women who trashes Kate but we are the racist… call it hypocrisy
I think they are referring to her plain Jane personality.
Kate is beautiful.
Kate is like Mary if Denmark. They both had time before marriage to get used to thier future role. Meghan' time to get used to the role was a lot shorter
You think she'd be ready for the fame though
you would think so, but TV/Hollywood fame and royalty fame can be different, plus there is a whole set of values your measured against that your just not in Hollywood.
@@tK-be6ns She advertized herself as humanitarian, activist and feminist. But she was not really mature, inteligent and well educated and now we see results.
To add, Kate grew up under the Crown, is used to the customs and mannerisms of the land, and can play her cards right as a result. An American fresh off the boat is going to have more faux pas when trying to adjust to a new culture, let alone a new marriage and family.
and MM did not use that time wisely. Mary of Denmark not only had to learn Royal Protocol she had to learn a whole new language. MeGain whinged that she had to learn to curtsey and whined that she was expected to learn the words to the British National Anthem.
I hated that the British press decided to pit kate and Meghan against each just like they did with princess diana and Sarah Ferguson the duchess of York making it look like there was this feud between them 😤🤯😬😠😡
MEGHAN ALSO WORE DIANA'S PERFUME THE NIGHT SHE MET HARRY -- SHE
WAS THAT MANIPULATIVE....IM SURE MEGHAN HAS WATCHED THE DIANA TAPES .....
I love them both so much, they're both so elegant and beautiful in their own ways. It's a shame the media pitted them against one another.
@Janice Walls cause she was publicly and internationally made out to be a bully in a situation in which SHE was actually the victim. I think anyone would want to set the record straight in a situation like that, especially when you're already being vilified for no reason.
What about the victims of meghans bulling in the Palace? Who's going to speak for them? Two of those were so traumatised that had to have counselling! Harry asked the pr team to cover it up and the mistake that was made that they agreed to it, I think they were so worried about the fallout and the fact she was biracial they kept quiet! Meghan has always portrayed herself as a victim 🙄 there were 12 members of her staff that left in a short space of time, some had worked for the royal household for many years! I would have to ask myself why?
@@suegroizard415 lol you are so delusional you believe in the manufactured telenovela created by the media. Life is not a soap opera and we do not know them personally, this whole circus and the people who perpetuated it are the greatest example of human"s stupidity. And a by product of misogyny.
@@suegroizard415 Because they were racist? Just a guess.
@@elananova Meghan is a victim of NOTHING. Why don't you talk about how she vilified the Royal family for NO reason after all they did for her and falsely accuse them of racism?. About the Kate incident, all witness that came forward after her allegations said the she was the one to make Kate cry and the reason her daughter, Princess Charlotte was never seen again at the fittings, she, the little girl, was the victim of bullying by Meghan, do a google search. I believe this to be true just by looking at her behavior with her own family, with P. Eugene, P. Beatrice, the six members of the Palace staff who QUIT to avoid dealing with her, not to mention the Oprah interview that had the sole intention to hurt the image of the Royal family. FYI since then 17 lies have been debunked which show her true character. She has not been vilified. She IS a bully.
The contrast between Diana's personality and Catherine's personality starts with Diana being the third of four living children and Catherine being the eldest. A similar contrast exists between William and his brother. Firstborn children, for the most part, tend to be more serious.
This one was so thoroughly researched. Thank you so much for all the hard work! As a person who avidly follows royal family news, I absolutely love this
The press is the cause of all these feuds!
Both women are amazing 👏🏿 Princess Kate will be a great Queen someday and Meghan will succeed in all her endeavours. No need to pitch one against the other. They have different destinies in life.
to be fair megans suffered enough the treatment she and harry are getting is terrible and wrong
@@dee22466 Yeah but Megan is a big fat gossip and making money off of it too. She's not any better, actually worse.
@@dee22466 and Princess Kate is the cause of Meghan's sufferings? Sick.
Markle is not amazing. She’s trash
Meghan is the one out there doing the pitching. All she has to do is shut up, get a job and get on with taking care of the kids she brought into the world.
Diana didn't have a supportive husband. Not comparable to the other girls.
American here. Used to watch Markle on Suits. Never knew she was mixed race until she was engaged to Harry and read it in an article 🤷♀️
Ahhh.. If you watch suit you would say that... Her character itself ia daughter of black father and white mother... And these days Hollywood usually cast someone from ethnic background same as character in movies/ series.. How you never know?
@@Rheawonder because it wasn't part of the story line. She was just an ambitious paralegal the show could push as a love interest. Her race had no impact on the plot.
I don't think anyone gave it a thought until Meagan mentioned it to the world.
Apparently she even called herself “Caucasian” ie white on her CV.
@@francesbaldwin2526Meghan always acknowledged her blackness before Harry.
Nothing is wrong. It's a normal relationship with ups and downs. It's just the media putting two women against each other.
Wrong.....Meghan thought she was going to go into the Royal family and change it all or modernized it. The Royal family is rooted in history and rituals that are not to be changed...period. Kate gets that Meghan doesn't. She cares about one thing....money. People have seen right through her and have seen her for what she is.....a fake, narcassitic, money hungry liar.
William and kate all the way!!! I have liked kate from the start and always thought ahe was stunning!!!
I think there's some tension, but I also think I lot of it is the media wanting to cause drama to get clicks. IMO Catherine is a team player, Meghan was just never going to be happy there. A lot of in-laws don't get along. One of my Aunts didn't speak to my Mother the first 3 years of my parents marriage.
Soo so true! And I'd even add that the real reasons why was never gonna fit in are really the reasons she was so much loved in the beginning, she's too modern (not that's bad) for an institution that takes very little doses of modernism, just to keep itself relevant.
I mean it in the sense that if you're a modern woman and everything you are goes against the beliefs of the family you're marrying, you're going to find yourself disagreeing and having friction and on top of that the publicity on you it's going to make it ten times worst.
Yo, that clip of Charlotte throwing a hissy fit and Kate scolding her was very relatable.
Can descipline be not applied to royals after all they have to learn what is right wrong from their parents the duchess is. Very intelligent and come from a respectable family.
@@faridabautista7738 ⁴
If you love her you don't have to hate me but if you love me you don't have to hate her - Megan Markle we should talk about this quote more
Pretty self evident. All the fans need to do is take heed. Then maybe the press will move on. Maybe
Except she didn’t mean that. Lets be real here, Meghan cannot stand Kate, that’s why she chose to threw her under the bus in that interview.
Why did she add that it was Kate who made her cry? It's contradictory.
Megain is not a Princess never has been.
@@nouchireiss2223 she only explain how the media was bias against her and are willing To create false narratif of anything that happen to her. She didnt trow anyone, except the media, under the bus in this situation. If anything, kate did by not defending or explaining the situation. Why blame the victim for coming foward and not the culprit meaning the media?
"Undeniably about race?" Lol! You can't even tell she's multicultural. She looks like a typical European to me. Spare me.
Are you American? Because while she's white passing to us, she's black in the UK.
@@annjepsen1621 I am from the US. I'm also multicultural myself. I've also been to Britain and find it hard to believe they consider her "black." She's done her best to not look ethnic at all, in my opinion.
She even admitted her resume stated caucasian 😅
@@PatricisHeth No way!? That's crazy. She's an a$@ 😀
I always laugh when I hear "famous actress" about Markle..i didn't know who she was till attached to Harry
if you lived in a village what we can said
Yacht girl. Village bicycle
Well that's you, but many knew her long before Harry. So sorry if you haven't heard of her before.
She's not a famous actress, she did have a part in one popular lawyer show and that's about it. Personally, I never liked her as an actress , but that's me. When she got engaged to that idiot royal, probably the lowest IQ of all royals, it looked like trouble from the get go. When she started to misbehave, she looked exactly like her dad, a bottom feeder. That woman is trouble and not in a good way. As for a comparison between the two women, they're in a different class altogether, as can be inferred from looking at their parents. Thankfully, nothing Markle produces now has any chance of registering in the UK. She's a pariah and so is her idiot husband.
Nobody knew who she was until then, and i live in the neighbourhood she lived in!!!
Their mum would be so happy for them both. I hope both women love the boys until the end and I hope both boys don't follow in their fathers footsteps and stay faithful to their new and hopefully forever wives. God bless both couples.
This is so tiring, I mean do we really need to choose between two incredible women? I love Kate and I love Meghan so I don't know why should I choose when I can love both, we can Love Both😌🤷🏾♂️🤷🏼♂️
One thing that I love about them is the duality they represent: "The Player" and "The Game changer" and actually I love that duality why? Because I feel identified with Kate and at the same time I have Meghan as my aspiration to be.
I just hate how people just want to compare them with everything they do, Diana was an individual, Kate is an individual and Meghan is an individual. So let's just not forget that
What in the world is incredible about Kate -- a woman whose only accomplishment in life is marrying well.
@@TheAmazingElexcia Kate ejected and expelled 3 kids in consecutive order every second year, to secure her Royal status after marriage.
Kate Middleton hung around for 10 yrs. Any other woman in her right mind, dating courting a guy, would of said Good Bye long ago. It's so obvious how calculating Kate Middleton was, waiting and waiting, chasing Prince William, that he would propose, but he didn't ! He was sowing his wild oats with other beautiful women, when Kate wasn't looking. She was not William's 'first' choice !
William was in love with Rose Hanbury and still is. He had an affair with Rose Hanbury 2 y
Kate Middleton has never forgiven William, but she's not going to divorce him! WHY? Because Kate Middleton wants to be queen consort. Yeah right, if that will ever happen !
Meghan Markle can't hold a candle to Kate Middleton
Do you actually know either of them in real life to say this with such authority? The palace media machine has shaped what everyone thinks. Their job is only to protect the actual monarch and the heir (as long as heir doesn’t outshadow the monarch. The rest are there to feed the public’s low IQ desire for juicy gossip.
Meghan is pretty! No face lift unlike Kate! Her husband doesn’t even like her. He likes Rose!!
@@brooklyn0992seriously?????? Bless your heart.
Imagine the press talking about how your wife is a better royal than your mother. What a messed up world.
I agree, Gogo/grandma from Soweto South Africa
even if i was madly in love with someone from the royal family i would simply never go out with them, it just doesn‘t align with my views on monarchy
Me neither, I wouldn't be able to handle the publicity from such a high profile, overly scrutinised relationship.
Monarchies should be abolished, even in constitutional monarchies they're just society leaches
@Ken: The Internet Boy This!
@@mekine45 Constitutional monarchies (such as The Netherlands, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Belgium) are often the most successful, free, and stable countries in their regions. Republics are prone to coups, dictatorships, and civil war. Not to mention our monarchy brings more revenue than it costs.
Every family has its fair share of drama. Even political families. Clintons. Trumps. Kennedys. Would you rather we have President Boris who is most definitely not known for wasting taxpayer dollars having all the decision making powers? 🙄
The Proctor and Gamble story she leaves out thee most important thing...that it was a CLASS PROJECT!!! They all did it not just her!🙄🤣
And she just signed a deal with them 🤑
If what you're saying is true, then it's shameless of her to use it to lift up her image and then earn some money from Proctor and Gamble.
@@luisabernandino6308 Its true. Even in the Nick News segment that featured her, they mentioned that it was a class project.
I believe each child had to write a letter for the project. It seems her letter is the only one that gets referred to.
You guys find any reason to invalidate her and we all know why 🙄
turns out it wasn't the press after all ....
The REAL problem here is the horrible british press, and taking their ideas and headlines as is they actually were the peoples' opinions. If people didn't give that much importance to all those horrible publications, they wouldn't be so powerful in defining history as they please.
Dianna lived in a loveless marriage, it was a nightmare however it was turned on her and insinuated that she was damaged goods.
If Prince Charles had been allowed to marry the woman he loved Camilla a lot of the drama and trauma could have been avoided.
@Tab Ford Harry not existing wouldn't be a bad thing!
Please make a video about Peaky Blinders. There’s so many things to analyze, mostly the main character Tommy Shelby.
Yeah! Great idea!
Him, Arthur and Alfie can be worth analysing
yes! Trauma, masculinity, family, etc.
lol
I don't even like the royals and yet I get happy to see the four together. This "feud" thing is toxic inventions to hook people in gossip and forget the important things.
It's very toxic "journalism". Especially since the British refer to the Daily Mail as the Daily Fail.
Prince William has a virtue I respect that his father lacked. He's been absolutely faithful Princess Kate.
I didn't get happy because I knew it was contrived. it was tense and awkward and forced. What i want to see is the 4 of them sitting around a sofa-- each one of them apologizing for things that occurred, for statements made , for attitudes since, for snubs, for keeping their kids apart, for failing to see what really mattered, and for letting pride hold them back. There is an imbalance of power-- they are not the fab four-- and may never be because it's "us and them" and William gets to rule. An olive branch? To ride in a car, to walk around a memorial but never speak, never make eye contact? Nah. Seeing them together put me on edge.
Oh I think the feud is very real and it's made up of 4 egos, none of which will back down. William and Kate want an apology for the interview, Meghan and Harry want an apology for the initial unresolved problems. Has 4 crossed arms no eye contact and the silent treatment resolved anything? Nope?
Give me the four of them in a backyard having dinner, laughing and joking while in the distance the 5 kids played together-- then I'll buy it.
@@deborahzawacki5809 there are problems, but they are reasonable people to an extent. Meghan showed sings of humility and nervousness and searched for cues in Will/Kate. William and Harry were showing politeness with William introducing Meghan for someone they knew as soon as they dropped off the car. Kate was stiff, but made space for the other couple in the same moment. Their body language was showing me that despite all, they do better than you might think due to headlines.
I got happy to see them together exactly because in the end they have a "duty" and they need to work together and that was exactly what they were doing. It's like seeing children that fought and when distant, bad-mouth the other and revolved in the wounds, but then coming close under a summer camp, drop most of bad feelings in the hiking because they are in a situation where they need to support each other and only they could help one another.
Sure would be nice to see everybody apologizing, even just for clearing the air, but we can't have it all.
I do believe the closeness, even that "forced", brought a new light over their little "squabbles". And in the end, Meghan was asking people to not hate her if it happens that they liked Kate more and vice-versa. Is this all not proof that despite issues (who doesn't have them), most toxicity comes from media exploitation?
It's how I see it.
kate could afford college.....where is the 'rags' part?
not every country has expensive college American
@@546-apoorvaranjan7 she went to the same college as the prince....believe me that‘s not cheap
@@nyah.o.0355 all universities cost the same in uk
@@hannahwebster5606 no they don‘t, especially not the private ones where kate and the prince went to. did u ever look up oxford? that‘s american college pay level
@@nyah.o.0355 Yeah, but they'll give literally anyone a student loan to pay for it though 🤷♀️ Keeps us all busy little worker bees for them once we've graduated (unless we plan to pull a prince at uni, that is).
Isn't it possible that each woman cried? That each was upset with the other
Meghan is a barracuda and it's already been leaked by the Givenchy staff at the dress fitting that Meghan was bullying 3 year old Charlotte. Her and Jessica Mulroney were mean girling the 3 year old. Calling her fat and not as good as Mulroney's daughter. Absolutely foul. Kate does not have the nature to make anyone cry. You can see that by looking at her. Princess Pushy on the other hand.....
There is no feud. Sometimes...situations and people are just not important enough to pay attention to...especially when people without couth are involved. Ignoring is the best way to deal with ongoing pesky problems. When narcissists are involved the best response is "NO CONTACT" because they just never stop trying to create chaos.
Look what happened last time an American divorcée married into the Royal family. It's only going to end in tears. America don't get it. I don't get it BUT what I do get is America not understanding anything outside America.
introvert vs. sexual is the dumbest dichotomy i've ever seen lol
@jen I don't think the person, who came up with that headline, realizes that they're implying Kate has no sex-appeal.
(4/20/2022)
There were so many stories saying that Megan is a narcissist taking Harry away from his family. As if his family isn't full of narcissists and toxic behavior!
@@purpleflows5680 Exactly!
_or Harry being a leech wanting to live off family money as an insult while dismissing the origin of sorts that is the rf income source_
_also that Harry should not be working [in such a capacity] nor be a supportive husband… because "attention" they give him means he agrees to harassment..?_
Harry wanted to leave for a long time,Maghan only help because she love her husband she said it on opera.
What do we learn from this story? People will always judge no matter who they are