Mainly he's talking about protecting the unintelligent/unconcerned/unlucky people from the more intelligent/lucky ones in a way of solidarity. Every good economist strove to define an optimal way of distribution for society with regards to specific philosophical measures. Funny thing is that none of such agreed on systems stays forever and the only "objective" way to do it are crisis.
This is a bad economist. He is positing three very indistinct causal factors and then telling a story. When listening, I have 100 objections that I would like to raise .
Mainly he's talking about protecting the unintelligent/unconcerned/unlucky people from the more intelligent/lucky ones in a way of solidarity. Every good economist strove to define an optimal way of distribution for society with regards to specific philosophical measures.
Funny thing is that none of such agreed on systems stays forever and the only "objective" way to do it are crisis.
1:42 😍
This is a bad economist. He is positing three very indistinct causal factors and then telling a story. When listening, I have 100 objections that I would like to raise .
123axel123 which objections? Could you give only ten of them?