Why Thor Love And Thunder Sucked - A Scene Comparison
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 25 сен 2022
- So most of us seem to agree that Love and Thunder was a terrible movie, and I think there's one scene that pretty much explains why. Join me as I compare two scenes from two Thor movies, to understand the difference between good and bad writing.
Want to help support this channel?
Check out my novels: www.amazon.com/Will-Jordan/e/...
Subscribe on Patreon: / thecriticaldrinker
Subscribe on Subscribestar: www.subscribestar.com/the-cri... 
Развлечения
Imagine a movie like Deadpool making a better story arc about cancer than a movie with Christian Bale and Natalie Portman in it…
Deadpool is a masterpiece and Ryan Reynolds nailed that role.
@@chasehedges6775 Cause he is Deadpool, haha.
@@moonlitskylight5740 Captain Deadpool! Haha.
Prepare for the third movie to be FUCKED beyond comprehension.
Ain’t that a sad reality
It's funny how Wonder Woman 1984 and Thor Love and Thunder were both written by their directors after directing 2 successful films that were written by other people.
Same with Rian Johnson and JJ Abrams. Good directors. Not as good writers. Or at least not in that particular genre. They are two very different talents and it is strange to me that producers keep tapping directors to write their own movies.
Ha! I just commented almost exactly the same thing.
@@choreomaniac
JJ and Johnson have both done amazing Sci Fi films. The problem was that they were given a foreign property and both decided to go in a completely original direction from what came before, instead of following the treatments given by George Lucas himself. Kathleen Kennedy was also at fault as she’s normally just a person who manages the harder parts of filmmaking so that the director can make his movie. It’s the reason why Spielberg was able to pump out so many high budget original films back in the eighties, I mean you can see the quality improvement after 1941 with Raiders of the lost Ark. So you basically had an uncreative Hollywood producer scouting out Hollywoods “most popular young directors”, in other words the directors that make movies that are easily marketable to audiences, to continue a franchise without the original creators input. I mean it was doomed to fail.
@@tallerwarrior1256 yea. I’m a Rian Johnson defender though I hate Last Jedi with a passion. He’s a talented writer and director but had no intention to make a good faithful Star Wars movie, let alone one in continuity with Force Awakens. He deliberately set to deconstruct the saga and the previous movie, a terrible plan for the bridge film of a trilogy and the eighth entry in one of the most beloved stories in film history.
Writer /Director is ALWAYS a red flag and almost always a bad idea. They are different jobs requiring different talents and combing them has the compound negative effect of removing a system of checks and balances or adding a point of failure.
"interesting comparisons with how Disney treats Norse mythology in the MCU, but I suspect that's a level of awareness that Taika doesn't possess" absolute gold
One thing that always bothered me about that scene is - here is Thor, the literal most famous person in Asgard and he shows up after a long absence and no one makes a big deal or even notices him?
Well I took that feature as being part of Loki's manipulation of Asgard in pretending to be Odin. The play and audience reaction serves to show us, the audience, that Loki was able to spin a particular narrative where Loki was the hero of Asgard and not Thor. The fact that nobody makes a big deal about Thor is done on purpose to show us that something's amiss here. When the lady in the audience puts her hand on Thor, his reaction is the same as our reaction, which is "Don't you recognise that's Thor?!". That's the whole point.
Compare it to the comics where when ever Thor shows up people will wave or shout his name. Guy's single handedly the foremost front line warrior the realm depends. And these people have been around. Most of them are thousands of years old, as he is, they know him, they are not living under a rock and only just moved to the big city last week.
Y'know, you could've just put a title card up saying Thor Love and Thunder sucked and no one would have doubted you.
Sooo true. It was mediocre and average
I wish that were true but just look at some reaction channels and all the people that claim to love this film in their comments
You’ve never been on Twitter…
“Strong woman” my ass! When you need to give her CGI biceps, you realize she’s about as strong as a cup of Earl Grey!
"Buying into his own hype" perfectly describes Taika's downfall.
it's one movie 😒
@@ac14cmpunk25 it's not so much about one person or one movie so much as it is an issue throughout Hollywood
Lmao..
@@ac14cmpunk25 .
@@ac14cmpunk25 🤓
I can’t understand how taika has fallen so far with this project
his early movies are brilliant. boy, eagle vs shark, hunt for the wilder people and jojo rabbit all have a fantastic balance of comedy and tragedy
why on earth did he think this abomination was acceptable? it’s beyond me
Money
maybe the investors are too involved in how the movie should go
I have no way of knowing for sure, but have you ever noticed that when some people are on the way up they can be sharper and more driven, and then when they reach some of the heights they become complacent, narcissistic, lazy and entitled. I imagine it's mostly that, because his early work was great and this is trash.
because he thinks its funny and enough to make people laugh🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Tbh i feel like jojo rabbit is a bit overrated
Can we give Anthony Hopkins some love for killing it in this scene? Hopkins playing Loki playing Odin.
Reminds me to Chris Evans who played Loki playing Cap in TDW 😹
No, we can't, because that scene was awful and Hopkins deserved better as this character. Like actually being a badass warrior who rides into battle to stop Ragnarok or something.
How the MCU deals with humor these days is a major issue. Phases 1-3 dealt with it in a way in which the humor was more of an ice breaker or a light hearted exchange between the characters that never messed with or ruined a serious plot. The story was still every bit as serious as it was needed to be. Phase 4 treats humor like its a necessity in every show or movie irrespective of what the story requires. Thor love and thunder is a film which requires a very serious approach given it's context. Instead Waititi was like "make Thor funny hehehehe"
it's the same with Star Wars sequels, everything is bathos humour
The humor used to be the icing on the cake. The success was noted so they decided to make all icing and no cake. No shocker that didn't pan out well.
for my personal taste, it was always too much and in phase 3, it basically felt the same as now. The MCU Movies where never "good", they were just less shitty and sometimes really okay.
Disney, Fiege and whoever saw that the humor was well-recieved and thought to themselves, "You can never have too much of a good thing." Thus, they demanded more and more comedy until MCU movies became toothless trash where serious moments can never be allowed to linger without someone making an "oh so random, lol" joke.
It's like a person who loves chocolate cake. Yeah, chocolate cake is great, but you can't have it every single day for with every single meal.
@@fattiger6957 💯👍.
Thor Love and Thunder made me realize just how good the first Thor film from 2011 was.
Once you get past the tilted camera angles, it's actually quite good. So long as the story and characters keeps you invested, it's no longer distracting.
Really the only thing i thought what was bad about it was the color of his eyebrows in the original movie.
@@somerandolad I’ll take tilted cameras angles over jokes any day. At least the camerawork was consistent
The first thor was never bad imo, but compared to this abomination it's great
@@somerandolad I liked the angles. it gave the movie a more unique feeling compared to other marvel movies.
Another small complaint I had with this movie is that the Guardians weren't in it for a long time. According to the advertisements, it felt like they were going to have a much larger role, but it didn't turn out to be that way. It felt like I was being advertised a different movie than what I got.
im just sad people will never know how great the story arc and character Gorr is from Jason Aaron's great Thor run
It's how I learned about Gorr, it's a fantastic comic run
Gorr was one of the better MCU villains, so the movie has made me interested in reading Jason Aaron's run.
That's the same reason I don't want Hollywood to make live action anime. That dragon ball evolution movie turned many people away from anime.
@@LessPegasusalthough Alita was great
@@laxmanrawat748 was that even a good anime?
Taika is the perfect example of what people refer to as an “ideas man”. Someone who is good for throwing out tons of options in the writing room but you’re not going to want him in charge because he is going to want to do all those ideas at once regardless of if they fit together or not.
Like Gaiman
Idea guys can also be good writers, it just takes some talent and know how in regards to what good writing actually is. The main perk of idea guys is that they have a creative spark that other types of people might not necessarily have, making them useful in a team of people in need of ideas but with the talent to handle other important roles. Without that kind of talent and just being a huge wellspring of ideas, an idea guy in the writers chair just ends up cobbling together a tangled mess of ideas vaguely resembling a story. The same person, but more well disciplined on how to write will still be coming up with all the same ideas, but will have a better grasp on which ones to keep and how to satisfyingly tie them into the story.
Overall though, idea guys are better off being part of a team rather than the main guy in charge of a project. Their input is valuable, but it should be up to people much more professional at writing and editing to decide which of their ideas to use and how to use them. If they do get an opportunity to write a whole script, it should be subject to peer review and edit by other talented writers before it goes into any sort of actual movie production.
@@Crow_Rising in my opinion the idea guy is valuable in the frontlines they should be in the sidelines and the main in charge goes for him or listens to one of ideas then that good sometimes the idea guy can become overwellming trust i am of those guys and when charge i usually make a great idea and ruined by accident by inputing alot of material in it
@im sacred
I ain’t even mad
Taika is also in love with his own repetitive jokes and sight gags, and he's just not as funny or original as he thinks he is.
It's like Melissa McCarthy's existence is a bad omen of Hollywood. Whatever movie she's in is ultimately shitty, whether she plays a main role or an extra. It's fascinating really.
It's not. She just sucks.
Her husband is producer.
@The wock you a bot
She was awesome in this is 40
spy was good
@@jameshaygreen6400 yeah I agree it was pretty funny
Funny that you chose these scenes in particular. To further emphasize your point, i can easily remember the scene ragnarok. i had totally forgotten the one from love and thunder!
Same here, when I saw the thumbnail I got confused because I didn't remember McCarthy in the scene in Ragnarok and it didn't make sense because they didn't have any knowledge of Hella yet, until he reminded me of the scene in L&T
I found the elevator scene in Thor: Ragnarok an example of a Taika scene done well. The development between Thor and Loki really hits an all time high in the brief dialogue they have in the elevator to the hangar. Thor acknowledges his brother, Loki for who he is and not what Thor hopes/wants him to be, but expresses his unconditional love for his brother regardless. The scene ends with Thor actually putting that new character development immediately into action by planting the shock device on Loki. Thor knew that after expressing his love to his brother that Loki would likely try something cheeky, showing further that he won't be tricked so easily as in the past.
This scene has 2 jokes. One after a long, digestible pause in the elevator to break the cathartic moment with their "Get help" bit. This bit shows that sense of brotherly love their relationship has desperately needed and I think fits well since they give the dialogue some time to breath before whipping it out. The other, when Thor actually gets the best of Loki ( and some payback) by unexpectedly planting that shock device on him. Both of these jokes were funny (imo) and actually expressed the recent growth Thor has gone through as a character.
Love and Thunder takes the goofyness from those jokes but removes the substance that respects the characters and story being told. They could have easily pulled this off with characters such as Gorr (if they had put decent time into his backstory) and Jane Foster who had a lot of potential for character growth. *sigh* I guess not :/
Right... So the guy who murdered thousands of people and tried to wage genocide and killed some poor guy Thor thought to be his friend (Coulson) is now redeemed all of a sudden and acts like a silly sidekick. Yeah, makes total sense for both to act that. For Thor to just accept Loki as his silly sidekick and for Loki to have a change of heart.
I seriously cannot understand how anyone who likes Ragnaschlock can have problems with Dumb and Thunder. They are one and the same. I would argue Ragnajoke is worse because it does more character assassination.
@@antona.1327ragnarok balanced the comedy way better than love and thunder. it was actually done well and is a good thor movie, it finally gives thor some character (until they make him a man child in l+t) and they do a great job at setting up infinity war.
I like how the whole character of Thor and his whole story has been boiled down to..." They got cool weapons."
also he has muscles and tries to say funny things
Here stormbreaker is our first beer
Your opinion was so stupid the bots took over
@@gsaucegaming6635 Night Champ.
Guy, please report the bots.
Thor Love and Thunder is a perfect example of what happens when a director is surrounded by yes people who never say no.
100% agree
The Phantom Menace of the MCU? 🤔
Mr. Plinket will Return.....
Is this what you was looking for? ruclips.net/user/shortsjqSbkAHTPLg?feature=share
That's basically all marvel movies these days.
Anthony Hopkins' "oh shit" was perfectly delivered in the Ragnarok play scene as well.
I was hoping Thor would have an emotional outburst about how much loss he's endured, particularly in the scene where Jane tells him her condition. I really thought he'd start breaking down or have an outburst because even though he's just barely gotten back to a "healthy" mindset (which I don't think is true given he's just avoiding everything outside of fighting), this is yet another significant loss that he's being confronted with. I mean, he really can't catch a break. Since Thor 2, I think he's suffered significant losses in nearly every movie. It's honestly super tragic, and while we got to see how affected Thor was in End Game, I don't think we really got to see his recovery. He just got a slight bit of catharsis when they defeated Thanos. So I was expecting him to FINALLY have that in this movie when confronted by Jane's situation. But... Nothing. We got like a sympathetic sigh and a frown.
Also, was I the only one who thought Thor should be confused by "cancer"? I mean, why would he already know the implications of cancer? I'd assumed that was a purely human affliction, one he hasn't encountered before, so unless he and Star Lord have been having serious heart to hearts about their pasts, I just didn't think this made sense.
Seeing Taika Waititi laughing at the CGI after the film had released was such a gut punch. A director I'd previously respected shitting on the (likely very overworked) CGI artists that helped to make the film just seemed so callous.
After Ragnarok, this was an incredible disappointment.
Yea i saw that as weird too. Shitting on the guys who make these movies possible for a quick laugh?
Yup just another self absorbed hollyweirdo
David McDevitt I’ve seen some folks say he wasn’t being serious but still it’s a low blow considering how overworked a lot of these VFX guys are and how little direction they get from the directors with how they want their effects done. But that’s modern Marvel. Let’s build the set pieces first and then write them. Horrible method and also asking for unreasonable changes at the last minute as opposed to when the effects are being built.
yup. I enjoyed Jojo Rabbit, but I am done giving money to projects he happens to be doing.
Didn't watch it. The trailers made it pretty obvious this movie was gonna be shit.
One of the major reasons Curse of the Black Pearl was such a great movie was that it was so tightly edited and written. Even the most seemingly pointless action scene was packed with character or world building moments. Shame Disney went from that to just giving a random guy a camera and thinking they can glue something together later.
Same. Just sad
Pirates of the Caribbean and the sequels are some of the worst films ever made, if your bench mark is the curse of the black pearl then you are part of the problem
At least it's not like the star wars sequels
@@Georgecurtis12 dead man's chest and at world's end was universally liked? Now stranger tides and dead men tell no tales we're bad
@@Georgecurtis12 You and your negativity is definitely part of the problem, man.
The theater scene could have been great if Taika put a bit more thought into the scene. The theater scene could have explained why Jane is able to wield the hammer. What I imagine is that the play elaborates on what Hela did to Thor's hammer. They could show how Hela secretly collected the hammer before being teleported to Asgard. While she was ruling Asgard, Hela works on a spell to restore the hammer for herself. She succeeds, but places a new spell on the hammer. The spell only allows those who are worthy of being queen of Asgard to lift Mjolnir. This would better explain why Jane is able to lift the hammer in the movie. Jane posses the right traits to lead Asgard to its previous glory at Thor's side.
What I find especially interesting is Chris H's statement - that he will no longer join a movie simply because of the director in charge of it. Poor guy, he got burned hard with this movie. I mean, look how RDJ walked away with almost godlike status, then you have the last 2 thor movies making him look like a clown when he could have been developed into something much better. I also think they are doing Scarlett Witch and Dr. Strange dirty.
Chris must have been happy to find himself lauded for his unexpected comedic gift and not be upstaged by Thor's little brother for a change, who awaits his own status as a sacrificial offering to the Great God Woke over on Disney+. And did they really have no clue as to how disorienting it would be to turn Wanda, of all people, into a supervillain?
Taika's actions make me feel like he was so sure of himself that he thought whatever he does it's gonna be a hit.
I met him once, hes a walking ego.
@MR map prob
@@EnterTheFenix technically, EVERYONE is a walking ego. 🧐
What sucks is that even their failures make money because the damn normies continue to show up.
@@DavidMartinez-ce3lp Ignorance is bliss, sources say. 😑
Anthony Hopkins also did a great Loki impersonation.
Which is what made that scene pure gold!
I mean he's Anthony Hopkins.... Wouldn't have expected anything lesser
@@RoGersVision Absolute legend
Because he’s Anthony Freakin’ Hopkins!
Interesting how your scene comparison review comes up on my feed a day after struggling to finally watch the movie itself. I think I slogged through 45 minutes before just giving up and watching something else. Too right about the 'play' scene, but the rest of what I watched felt as if this scene never ended. All of what I watched seemed like a bad local theatre play, where the leads are given to relatives of the donors that help keep the 15 seat theatre open. And the writing! Imagine Thor having to explain to a supposedly dying Sif that she can't get to Valhalla by dying on the battlefield, but that she has to die in the actual battle and her being surprised by this! No self-respecting Viking would ever need this explained, let alone the Norse gods they worshipped. If she dies from her wounds after the battle, she'd be given a proper sending to Valhalla by having her body cremated on a longboat. This information isn't even difficult to read about so the entire scene was another waste of time and dialogue, leading to nothing.
As I said, I surrendered after 45 minutes of this drivel. How the movie ends, I have no idea. Nor do I care. I sure hope Marvel rights the longboat very soon, before they actually make the DC movies seem good by comparison.
"A low effort, low intelligence, undisciplined production...by a man too complacent to push himself to do anything better" is the absolute best way to describe Love and Thunder. Like you said, Taika Waititi is definitely a very talented and creative film maker (I think Jo Jo Rabbit is one of the best films of the last decade) but he definitely phoned this one in. It's not a bad movie, it's just kind of a goofy nothing of a movie that criminally wasted an amazing villain portrayed by probably the most talented actor to enter the MCU since Robert Redford in Winter Soldier.
Taika in love and thunder is like when you tell someone they're funny and they ramp it up and tell a joke every 2 seconds.
Yup
Nailed it
100%. "Ragnarok had a funnier tone than the other films; it was refreshing!" Taika: "Oh, so you want jokes, eh? Take note, writing team: NO SCENE MAY EXIST WITHOUT A JOKE FORCED INTO IT! It's what the audience wants, right?"
Like Paul Feig.
@@albay543😊
I'm sure most people have heard that Taika offered Natalie Portman a role in his Star Wars project, apparently unaware that she had already played one of the most important characters in the entire Star Wars universe in three films. It says something about Hollywood that they would choose someone to take on a project they don't care enough about to know that sort of thing.
Taika shouldn't have had an excuse in 2022. This is post iPad, iPhone and using almost any big device with wifi on the go type of world.
If he had gotten big in say in the late 2000s with a different project starring natalie Portman and didnt know she had star wars roles previously, he could get a pass.
Not now with all the new tech and cellphones with wifi on the go. That means Taika appears as a fool now.
Sweet Jesus
@@Thomasmemoryscentral WTF?! LMAO
Yeah Kiwis were never known for being smart lol.
After Rian Johnson are you surprised?
@@At0mic890 I'd like to believe it was just a joke, but given the way he acts and how completely in his own world he seems to be, I can easily see him having no clue. 50/50, it was a really lame joke or he's just that detached.
Let's face it: a Thor movie series without Thor becoming king of Asgard feels like Naruto without Naruto becoming Hokage in the end. Somehow the hole point of the entire story got lost along the way and there is no way to fix that.
Really, this is a good lesson for anyone making any sort of published media period. If you're going to tell a story, you need to know the purpose of each scene, what it accomplishes, and how effectively it accomplishes it. If your first response to being asked if your scene accomplishes one of those three things is, "Well, that's too strict of a criteria," you aren't making something for others to enjoy, you're making something purely for yourself. And yes, I've talked to many an aspiring writer, and when I ask if their scene either develops a character or progresses the plot, they gave push back to that.
He's a collaborator. That means he needs foils. You nailed it in your rundown of him. He's always been part of a writer's room, and as the writers room joker he's hugely valuable. Putting him alone at the front was the mistake. If he wasn't such a narcissist I'd think he just needs a partner, but what he probably needs is a handler who is also the lore guy ("no Taika, you can't do that. It doesn't make sense, from a lore standpoint or in the real world.")
For all Drinker's giving Ragnarok a handjob it really was not half the film he's making it out to be.
It was still a roling shit fest of never ending jokes and bad storylines.
Was it better by comparison to Love and Thunder? Yes.
But that isn't a high bar to jump now is it?
This sounds an awful lot like what happened to the star wars prequels. :/
I havent't seen anything good from Taika since Jojo Rabbit. Seems to me that he is a one hit wonder. He should go back to smaller budget films with real meaning and leave the MCU if he wants to survive as a director.
To defend Taika a little bit, when you get as big as him you often find yourself surrounded by enamored yes-men who don't feel it's their place to give the famous director feedback, even if he really needs it. It apparently happened to George Lucas on the Star Wars prequels too, no one was willing to give him proper feedback, even when he asked for it.
I remember seeing a James Gunn interview where he mentions he has a few close writer friends he bounces his ideas off of, who aren't afraid to tell him when they think one of his ideas stink. It's probably why he's one of the few current directors who can put out shows of consistently good quality. (He also believes in finishing scripts before beginning filming, something Disney has not been doing, and it shows.)
@@jessip8654 Yes, try not to live in an echo chamber as a creative. Invite critique. Spot on observation!
The first play scene also shows that Thor is getting better at seeing through Loki's illusions, as opposed to the first Avengers where Loki comments that Thor always falls for them.
I didnt think about that. Very good point because you see him put that shock disc thingy on Loki later on and states that he is predictable. Great catch
@yes K-PAX
This really holds up on multiple views. I think it's one of your better works. Well done sir!
They should have made Gorr the Main character for this movie.
He became the main side character instead.
I watched it about a week ago and while watching it, I feel like watching a series of videos on youtube while reading something on a book. I never got emotionally engaged, jokes are too forced, and everything seems to hold no consequences. When it ended I was like "Huh, so that movie ended" I never though about it again except for thinking about how bad it was.
My late dad would have said it was very forgettable!
ngl though I found the relationship between the by-frost and thor pretty funny
Freakin loved it! ❤
@@brandonshaw2120 there is an immortal meme in that sentence...... somewhere.
There is one good line in that whole movie.
Brilliantly said. Plus Taika seems to forget, the same joke rarely works twice.
but comedy comes in threes
It can, but you have to put a new spin on it.
@@mrshmuga9 case in point, red vs blue
that basically Taika's whole movies and his entire career, he is a one shot one movie type of person
Bore ragnarok
That joke worked cos it was twice
Since Thor is my favourite character, I REALLY wanted this to do well. I also happen to be a massive fan of Marvel Zeus so... yeah, that feeling you're imagining right now? That was my reaction to pretty much this whole movie. Of course the Drinker does it again with another on point video but damn, the disappointment just his harder than usual with this one...
As a side note, seeing Taika's sweater blurred out at 9:14 was satisfying reminder that Disney doesn't own everything and hasn't even really tried to get into manga/anime. (If you look closely, its Monkey D. Luffy from One Piece)
I think that oscar Taika won for best adapted screenplay with JoJo Rabbit made him assume everything he writes now is pure cinematic gold without having to slow down and be critical about it anymore. He absolutely CAN write well but even the best artists are capable of producing shit when they become too confident in their work.
wrong
It has the tragic feel of M Night Shyamalan all over again.
Jojo Rabbit was an adapted screenplay, not an original one?
@@louisduarte8763 You still have to have serious chops to write an Oscar winning adaptation.
Jojo Rabbit was a shit movie anyway
This is what happens when a director buys into his own hype. He decided to make himself the comedic relief in every film now and it increases more and more as time goes on.
@Bazinga thats scary
Maybe there is a deeper reason to your theory. As each movie comes and goes his comic relief and role get larger.
Maybe the whole reason Love and Thunder is a joke is because Taiki has broken the fourth wall and as Director in charge of the whole film.. that is his new creation and thus the movie is a joke to represent his power?!?
It's easy to hate on the corporate executives "stifling muh creativity" but the dirty little secret is that most creatives are in desperate need of an editor that will tell them in no uncertain terms that their idea is terrible, but could be improved with some massive pruning.
@@mariokarter13 True. Numerous films have proved this.
@@mariokarter13 Even Ridley Scott needed to be reined in for "Alien", and as Prometheus and Covenant demonstrate, when he's not, his work is shit.
But nope, modern Hollywood thinks all ideas are brilliant ideas as long as they check the right boxes for the right demographics.
Taiki Waititi is a director who has a constant need to include himself as an actor in his movies. Like Pacquiao and Jaworski on their basketball teams..
We would all surely forgive him and be happy with this if the movies stayed high quality.
When i watch those videos about how bad the MCU is now, i remember when i watched Endgame and thought to myself "Oh boy, can't get better than that, it's all downhill from here..."... Little did i know how literal that would be...
Not to mention it had been several movies/years between The Dark World and Ragnarok, which further validated the scene in that most people would’ve forgotten what happened to Loki without it. This new scene is just, “Hey! Remember that funny bit we did last time? Let’s do that again because it worked last time, right?”
@Joshua EdwinRoehl: Go away nerd.
The problem with repeating scenes in a comedy sequel is that jokes are generally way less funny the second time around. In Raganrok the play scene was basically quite funny (as well as the various other purposes it fulfilled as described in the video), but repeating it in L&T.. well it's just like hearing the same joke again - the joke is old and not really funny, but this time it doesn't even fulfill any other purpose either. I'm surprised that someone like Waititi who has made their name with humourous films thought this would work.
@@legostuds680 Fair, but we also have a time hole from Covid, and Ragnarok was much more memorable and well received than Dark World.
You have to appreciate Anthony Hopkins' acting skills for that Ragnarok scene
I chuckle every time he realizes Thor is there and he says under his breath, “Oh shit.”
Only anthony hopkins could play anthony hopkins as played by Tom Hiddleston
he is a gem that's for sure
Only Anthony Hopkins can give us such a magnificent scene in Thor 1 when he strips Thor of his powers and makes us believe that it is Loki who is impersonating him in Ragnarock.
In 2016 Hopkins said he was going to take a break from pumping out 2-4 films a year because he didn't like Transformers, I guess Marvel either paid him enough or he actually had fun with Odin because he did that role after making that claim and then went into a two year mini-retirement afterwards.
i want you to know as an aspiring filmmaker myself i really do pay attention to videos from people like you vito on how massive films can fail and i take it to heart. i dont want a single second of any of my movies to waste peoples time and each scene will be nessasarry
I've talked about it before that I think this movie should have been 2. They should have done one where Gorr was the villain, and it was a serious movie, and another without Gorr, and make it a funny silly Thor movie. EITHER of those would have been so much more successful than trying to combine the 2. Christian Bale did an amazing job with Gorr, and he deserved a more serious movie. But on the other hand, the interactions with Thor/Jane/Mjölnir/Stormbreaker are great, and It could have been a fun movie of its own, or even just a short. If they did one before Gorr where he met with Jane again and had the relationship issues with the weapons, then progressed into a more serious Love and Thunder it would have been fantastic.
I also wish they would have stuck with the original idea of Zeus being a sort of mentor for Thor. They could've used that for a more serious version.
Seeing Taika laughing at the cgi was pretty much the kid sitting on a plastic chair stack laughing at the other kids
@Bazinga Don't encourage the bots.
@@TheMTSilver That's a bot too!
@@lainiwakura1776 Yeah they're on every popular channel now with dedicated bots that contain names of the channels plus with "regular" bots who upvote their shit and even comment on them... Those bots are evolving lol.
@@TheFlamingPike And yet RUclips isn’t doing anything about this.
@@TheMTSilver what's it gonna do? Read the comment?
That scene in Thor: Ragnarök also showed that Thor was no fool. He see's through the visage and can tell it's Loki. This sets it up nicely for when later in the movie Thor see's through another of Loki's tricks and gets the upper hand on him.
It's not even that Thor is smart.. although he's not dumb. It's just that he knows his brother, better than anybody else knows him.
Asgardians have intellects that human beings can't comprehend. I know you have to create a character within the bounds of what people can realistically believe, but Asgardians are galaxy-spanning aliens that created wonders. The average Asgardian is roughly 90-100 times stronger than Captain America and significantly more intelligent, but they are portrayed as being as meek and feeble as humans. That's why I've always had a problem with how movies present superhumanly powerful beings. They would move so quickly and create such destruction that humans wouldn't even be able to see them. They would appear as a blur to normal humans. Even in Star Wars, the Jedi and Force-users are superhumanly fast and superhumanly strong, because of their connection with the force, yet they are portrayed as regularly-adept human sword-fighters and nearly as slow. An olympian human fencer or master human swordsman wouldn't even be able to react to a Jedi attempting to strike them down. That's how fast they are.
Exactly, where in Love and Thunder, Thor is just a parody of himself and is always mocked at
@@Ambusher1st There's literally nothing to suggest that Asgardians are more intelligent than human beings.
@@Psyrus88 You’re kidding right? Alien beings that are regarded as literal gods are going to be as intelligent as human beings. Yeah, let’s go with that. I can’t believe someone would even suggest that.
Taika Waititi is like a guy who has successfully built and designed houses. With Thor: Ragnarok, he was given the opportunity to oversee the construction of a well-designed skyscraper.
After rising to the challenge (pun intended), he met with his bosses who inexplicably announced, "Now we're going to let YOU design a skyscraper." Instead of admitting that he had no idea how to do that, Taika just started laughing his ass off and stacking a bunch of shiny and expensive materials as high as he could with no rhyme or reason.
At the ribbon-cutting ceremony for what had essentially become a skyscraper-sized pile of garbage, the public openly expressed its disapproval of the misguided and self-indulgent monstrosity which now marred the city skyline.
Learning nothing from the abysmal failure, Taika's bosses have allegedly rehired him to design a second skyscraper, this time in the Star Wars district.
Not surprisingly, citizens are fleeing the city in droves.
The play scene in love and thunder stood out to me because of basically everything said.
The scene in Thor Ragnarok didn't just gave us insight into Loki, but also into Thor.
He was allways fooled by Loki up to this point. This was the first time we as an audience see Thor outsmarting him, showing us reall characher development.
He would’ve never known if Surtur hadn’t told him but yes, growth regardless.
@@BHardawayMusic true but I atleast think him using his hammer in that way to get loki to confess was more clever then how he used to be... which was all muscle and no brains...
@@mckstellar1005 Yeah he for sure leveled up especially at the end with the electro taze thing when Loki tried to betray him again. Which makes his de-evolution in Love and Thunder all the more disappointing after his character arc throughout Infinity War and Endgame. It feels like many steps backwards.
Kind of like how you should develop your English so you can, in the future, spell "real" correctly.
@@PubicGore you're a charming lad aren't you.
One of the biggest problems with L&T was that it basically rehashed all the same stuff we’ve seen before in slightly different ways.
- The Immigrant song used twice in Ragnarok was used 4 times here
- Gorr is basically a watered down Thanos using some magic macguffin to achieve his goal of mass murder in an instant
- The Zeus post credits scene is basically identical to the Guardians 2 post credits scene
- The theatre piece being rehashed for jokes
- Korg fake dies like Loki (but isn’t nearly as emotionally charged)
- Korg is just being Korg. He was fine as a side character with a few minutes of screen time total, but he quickly gets annoying as a main character
- Thor becoming a dad like Tony
- Thor needing to “figure out who he is” for like the third time now
- Getting the thunderbolt because it’s a powerful weapon that can help stop Gorr like when Thor went to make Stormbreaker in IW
Also, all the characters felt like parodies of themselves. Pretty much the entire movie felt like if the Team Thor shorts were turned into a theatrical movie. Nothing but jokes, turning Thor into an idiot, etc.
Also, Taika really seems to hate Sif and the Warriors Three. He killed off the three instantly with no regard for Thor’s emotional response, he brought Sif back in a comic accurate costume just to cut off her arm and write her out of the movie, and I feel like it was all just to make room for Valkyrie and Korg (which is just an excuse for him to talk more and more in these movies). I’m pretty sure the only reason Sif wasn’t killed in Ragnarok was because of scheduling conflicts with the actor.
And so much of the dialogue was basically just exposition and describing the plot like they’re reading script notes or something. It’s that one line Korg had in Ragnarok where he analyzed the loss of Mjolnir and applied to basically everyone.
To me, Thor’s arc should have ended with him becoming king. It’s what his entire journey was leading up to, so to basically have that thrown away in favour of more wacky adventures feels like a character assassination.
You're right
I agree.
While the movie itself was entertaining in its own regard, it was a shame in terms of the overall MCU and the character and its development in general.
I didn’t hear Immigrant Song at all. There was a ton of Guns N’ Roses though.
@@KevyNova Yes. I was wondering. There wasn't any part of the immigrant song in the entire movie.
At least the Team Thor sketches went for 2-3 minutes. They're funny and entertaining because they don't have/need a crazy story and the comedy was a hit and run, not a constantly smash you on the head for 2 hours. Watching characters do goofy shit for the sake of goofy shit is great for a short spin off like Team Thor but you can base a FEATURE LENGTH film on "hahaha so randem XD lol". Ragnarok worked because while there was a lot of goofy shit, it was balanced carefully with seriousness, had stakes, the characters developed meaningfully and stayed serious when necessary for the story. No one is going to take your plot seriously if your characters don't even take it seriously.
"Melissa McCarthy" was all that had to be said for me to avoid this expensively-made turd! Thank you for the well-made breakdown/comparison!
This! Thank you for your very accurate depiction of what’s wrong with this movie and frankly what has been wrong with all of phase 4
It's nice to have someone around who can clearly and logically explain what you intuitively know but can't describe. This one earned my subscription.
This critical drinker individual truly has a large acumen of critical thinking and logical points
Good post buddy. That's exactly me.
Welcome to the club.
Drinker is the best. Second to none.
@@albay543 I guess I should start drinking too.
Gonna boost my critical thinking too
It's almost like Taika's comment that he'd "destroy your mythos in a minute, baby." wasn't just a statement about his willingness to experiment with defined characters and franchises as an intention to ruin them but also an unknowingly self-aware statement about his complete ineptitude as a writer.
I’m inclined to think he was being completely open and frank about his intentions, just no one believed he would be that callous
Felt more to me like a "fuck you" to another culture.
Yeah well, at least my culture and people wasn't raped enslaved and destroyed, unlike his, which I'm happy about since he made that comment.
@@samblack5313 He is Jewish, Lauren Hissrich did the same to Witcher, Lindsey Weber did the same to Rings of Power, all of them are Jews.
The theatrical play scene could've worked if we see Jane watch it but we didn't, idk why they didn't do that. That way it tells Jane what happened to the hammer and she her self goes to that spot alone by herself.(advances the plot) Where also would make her more sympathetic (as a character development?) towards Thor instead of being stingy at the get go about who left and what not, seeing how Thor went through a lot, and also it would contextualize and give more meaning to hear death when she fade away just like Odin did.
(She could also make it funny by saying "i hope this doesn't become a theatric play")
would make sense only if thor saw the play too i guess, but i think he knows about it already seeing that he saw the previous one.
6:08 is WORLD DEVELOPMENT, it shows that the same guy acting in movie 3 is still acting in movie 4. It's like when you see a man and a woman who were flirty in 1 movie end up with the woman pregnant or with a child in another. If a series has no character mentions outside of the main cast, you would say it is poor. This scene just shows you how the Asgardians are living on Earth. Characters we had previously seen.
Taiki Waitit is like that flamboyant uncle who thinks he's a riot and won't stop making lame jokes while everyone secretly just wants him to be serious for a change or shut up for a while..
He did good with Ragnarok cuz the jokes were spaced out and it felt like there were actual stakes, plus the addition of Hulk as a partner was the true cherry on top. Thor 4 feels like a directionless mess by comparison, just like She-Hulk, Ms. Marvel, and the many other mediocre projects part of Phase 4.
Which is wild because he can hit the serious notes and he can hit them hard. JoJo Rabbit was a prime example of that.
Taiki actually has made some really great comedies (Jojo Rabbit, Hunt for the Wildepeople), but I don't think his humor suits Thor at all.
@@thethiccdonut5257 If they had left Ragnarok to just be Planet Hulk, maybe.
Idk, I like most of his stuff. This is the first thing of his that I didn't care for, tbh. I hope this isn't the first symptoms of what I like to call "M. Night Shyamalitis."
Even my girlfriend didn't like this movie and she likes most movies she watches. No matter the pain it causes me!
She's a keeper
My 7 year old really liked it. One of the few movies hes enjoyed...Ever. I think that was the real target demographic of this crap.
Bro stop lying to the internet your mom isnt your girlfriend
@@jorgerios1473 don't be jelly that my mom is better than your dog
NAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHM You just gonna let him say day?
hey .. like your content and critical mind. just had a question out of curiosity more than anything and that question is : is this your real voice ? and how you really talk or is it a bit ? please i want to know. thanks in advance if you reply. if you dont its fine but i would reall.y appreciate it dear sir
Honestly the worst thing about this movie was how underutilized Christian Bale was as the villan. How exactly is Gorr THE GOD BUTCHER not shown killing a single God after his intro sequence in the beginning of the movie? It seems like they actually put time and thought into his backstory/motivations but then don't give him nearly enough screentime to show him as a real threat to Thor and the gang. What a waste of both an amazing actor and interesting villan
There's two expression that comes to mind after this review: "One-trick pony" and "ego-trip." Both brilliantly illustrated by Mr. "I'll destroy your mythos in a minute baby!"
He even made his own self insert character gay for ego stroking and brownie points.
He’s the new M Night Shamalamadingdong
I'm so glad people are finally catching up to how fucking overrated Taika is. After I saw Ragnarok, I hated his vision for Thor. He ruined the character. Hope Marvel corrects in the future.
Taika seems to have a few strong suits, like creating some really impressive visual moments. But he isn't nearly restrained enough at the same time, wanting to cram slapstick or dated comedy into stories that don't call for it. It undermines the characters to the point that it's hard to take them seriously.
ok
"It undermines characters to the point that it's hard to take them seriously."
If you're looking for a movie about Thor that tries to take the characters "seriously" then you're probably looking for one called
THOR: DARK WORLD.
It didn't work, though. Thor-post Guardians of the Galaxy is the best iteration, in my opinion, and that's what you get with Love and Thunder.
Just my 2 cents.
@@bensolo7217 And Thor 1 too. I would probably agree that both movies took Thor so seriously that it made the movies less fun. But 4 makes him barely more than a Three Stooges act. Thor in the Avengers is just right IMO. A little bit of comedy here and there, aimed at how seriously he takes himself.
@@bensolo7217 its the polar opposite of dark world then , in that sense. Still not good.
@@bensolo7217 Thor from Avenger: Earth's Mightiest Heroes takes him seriously, and the show was all the better for it.
Thor Ragnorok was one of my favorite movies for quite a while when I was younger , I’m glad you’re not as critical of it as you are of other marvel movies.
Correct me if I am wrong but didn’t Thor’s dad told him that the hammer only helps him focus his power not that it grants him thunder power? So, how does Jane get powers then?
Thank god Taika Wanktiti is no longer in MCU as we know so far. Let’s keep it that way
@THE INFINITIVERSE ™️ SAGA FRANCHISE Apparently rumor surface suggest Taika no longer “ interested “ in Thor but we all know that Disney secretly ousted him after the fiasco that is Love and Thunder.
Maybe now we can actually get beta ray bill
Wanktiti... 🤣😂🤣
Or films in general. He made Jo Jo Rabbit. Jo Jo fucking Rabbit.
@@treyblowski Or Eric Masterson.
You are never more powerful than when you have a solid crew rollin with you keeping your ass in check as well as looking out for your best interests. Taika deleted the part that made him work correctly, his writing crew.
ok
See also, Elon Musk.
The first 2 minutes were very informative. I started thinking about She-Hulk and how none of the scenes seem to meet the very basic requirements of storytelling. RoP is like that, too.
Possibly a controversial opinion, but I think they should've brought back the director of Thor 2 (Alan Taylor), or even Kenneth Branagh from Thor 1. Both would've worked better for the more serious tone of Thor 4, from Thor having to deal with his own depression, the god butcher, Jane's cancer etc. Both directors have shown they do a good blend of humour and serious, ie "congratulations, you just decapitated your grandfather".
Or, to be really adventurous bring in Edgar Wright, who was meant to do Antman 1.
Things like this does raise questions about the awareness Waititi had while making the previous scene. It's one thing if a person fails to replicate a previous success it's another if they demonstrate they don't understand why their previous success was good.
I think Waititi is a very creative person and has good ideas, but not every Idea of a creative person is necessarily good. I think he got too cocky/confident in his own success that he thought he couldn't make anything bad. The problem is that people at disney thought the same and gave him freedom to do whatever he wants
Problem is he didn't write Ragnarok only added a creative spin to it or direct it. Not a lot of marvel directors if any in my memory actually write the plots. Marvel likes to ground them a little bit.
The comedy was already overused in Ragnarok. But it made money, so Taika went completely overboard in this one...
Yep. Also Taika is too mercurial, thinks this is the source of his success. And he likes the smell of his own farts, so to speak. Up until now, he's not had enough people forcing in the discipline of continuity, not writing in a lazy, quick resolution style.
@@user-xx6vy9ri8p couldn't agree more. I remember thinking that, since in that movie Thor loses a lot of things but everything was a joke. And now it seems a far better movie when you compare it to love and thunder. This shows just how bad he fucked up. He basically took the most unnecessary part of the previous movies and made it into a new movie thinking that that's what made the previous good
"Like any good narcissist he sees himself as the flawless, tragically misunderstood, hero of his own story." - I am so taking this line! Can be applied to so many :D
Taika to a T
As someone playing through borderlands the pre-sequel, a certain jack comes to mind.
Yes, I love hearing little gems like this from the Drinker.
Including yourself
Taika Waititi is basically this generations Mike Myers, he'll be big for a while then his ego will grow to the stage people will get sick and tired of him. He also self inserts like M Night Shyamalan.
5:43 why there is a spaceship in the background?I dont remember anyone in this scene traveling by a spaceship
Taika Waititi gave me the vibe of that famous quote of George Lucas directing here "faster, more intense". Taika saw the succes of Ragnarok and could only think, more of that, more jokes, more banter more, more, faster, more intense, more funny
And this is how he killed the movie by overdosis
Except George Lucas was able to correct his mistakes and deliver something worthwhile in the end of his prequel trilogy. Taika just doubled down on his immaturity and narcissim, leading to this mess
@@jdmangrich in a way its kinda the same in the movie, the more she used Mjolnir the faster the cancer kills her.
@@user-jy2qu7pu9r Absolutely. "You don't know what you want until I give it to you" and "Ill destroy your lore in a second" those quote from Taika made me kinda despise him
@@user-jy2qu7pu9r 💯💯💯👍👍
Taika Waititi's failure with Thor: Love and Thunder was well explained in one of Mauler's video's: give the man a good script and he's great with his little humorous touch-ups of that script. Let him do the entire script and it almost becomes a slap-stick movie with a rapid-fire of bad jokes.
Very much reminds me of Jar Jar Abrams in that regard, great at directing and focusing an intense action scene with sweeping cinematics. Make him do anything of actual substanse to the story and its all "mystery box"
Didnt he do Jojo Rabbit?
i think the problem isn't letting him write its letting him write without constraints, some of my favourite movies have been made by waititi in his earlier years when he didn't have such a ginormous budget
thisnis why you always need an outline.
He’s written some great movies as well. Maybe the problem is having him write a movie building on an already established world and characters. Or maybe it just wasn’t the right type of movie for him to write. Either way, it’s a shame it didn’t work out.
THANK YOU. Never does anyone think twice about the use of Viking culture for fun. But boy oh boy do we need to keep asian/african/whatever cultures to such a high regard.
As a Swede it really annoys me with the double-standard of not being able to do an asian dialect for fun (not in a mocking way.) but THERE IS A SWEDISH MUPPET THAT GOES HURDIHURRDURR.
Don't get me wrong. I think the Swedish Chef is absolutely amazing. But if you really break it down its absurd how one is okay but the other one is 'super racist' no matter the context.
Edit; Just to clarify i think both should be okay and i'm not offended by the use of Viking culture. I think we should be able to enjoy all forms of background and types of dialects and have fun. Not get so damn overly PC that we lose sight of what is offensive and what isn't.
It’s because Taika is a another nepotism hire Jew
@@magicman3163 Sad how fashionable antisemitism is becoming amongst the ignorant.
@@lefantomer ignorant? Nigga the working class with rise again like Malcolm X said “Jews put themselves where they are the power we can say it’s whites but we all know what type of whites they just so happens to be specifically mostly Jews.”
@@magicman3163 You are what is accurately described as a neo-Nazi and should be banned from this site. Drop dead.
@@lefantomer Malcolm X and black peoples be nootsis an Shieet Bruh open your eyes
This movie looked like It was made for 10 years old
The Drinker's strength is his ability to explain why things work or don't work, in a way anybody can understand. Anybody can dunk on things they don't like. It's much harder to back things up with premises and reasoning, and show how things could have been done better.
The educational angle also contributes to fixing the entertainment industry. Maybe one day, one or more of the million+ viewers of this video will be out there, making better pop culture for us all.
I agree. The part that i appreciated and learned from the most is the part about advancing the plot. I always knew that my writing rarely advances the plot, but I couldn't figure out what was wrong. Now I think that I can finally move on.
I can't understand him or any Scotsman.
@@eugenetswong move on LOL
I disagree. The Drinker's true strength lies in his liver.
@@sebaschan-uwu honestly i've always wanted his liver so that i can drink all of the world problems away!! 😂😂😂
That "scene" felt like it brought the entire movie to a complete "stop". A professor in architecture school scolded a student, "You can make people move forward by painting a great big arrow on the wall. Or, you can use the subtleties of design and have people move forward without their even being aware that they are being directed."
Like an Ikea store 😛
@@Aizucita quite literally
Do more videos like this. It was really well done and I learned stuff
I think I've learned more about story writing in the past 11 minutes than any writing class has managed, lol.
I like how the more popular the Drinker has gotten, the more he has flexed his knowledge of film concepts and techniques. You just know that it pisses off the mainstream "critics" to no end.
I saw some shitty video of a guy complaining that Drinker was a bigoted reactionary and the biggest problem on RUclips. But like the comments said, Drinker isn’t toxic. He’s intoxicated.
I think what pisses them off more is that he gives an honest run down rather than shill for a corporation like they do. He doesn't march in lock step with them and they can't control or manipulate him. And because of this he's earning more and more viewers trust each time.
@@volt42re The funny thing is, his first videos weren't done with the "inebriated speech" trick and they weren't as good. I would opine (and it is just my opinion) that the "drunken rant" format gives his reviews a character that makes them distinct on RUclips.
The man ruthlessly tears things down and just when you’re getting mad about it, he proves everything he says
It's like the so called comedians when they hate Trump because he is funnier than them.
Petition for Critical Drinker to actually be a screenwriter for Marvel
I’d watch a Marvel film written by the Critical Drinker anyday
Or DC
no why on earth would you want to do that to him?!
Nah, it'll be fine
Petition to boycott these movies so they stop making so much money
He keeps telling us to go away now.. but we keep coming back! When will we learn!!??
I remember Mccarthy being fine in Gilmore Girls but after watching the series again on Netflix, I've noted how her terribleness was active then too. Mike and Molly was okay, I compare her performance there to Sam Jackson playing Windu.
I love how both the new Thor and Dr. Strange introduce macguffins that could have stopped Thanos if anyone bothered to mention it earlier.
I noticed that also. It's like they completely forget everything that has happened already
The DS film is much clever here. There is a macguffin that can defeat Thanos, but using (or searching for) it has dire consequences. So it's pretty understandable someone might have known about it but just didn't want to use it.
Marvel just expands the universe without thinking about the consequences for the story
What you mean in Dr. Strange?
@@dlsupremeg. The Book of Vishanti, a spellbook that can grant you whatever spell you need to do whatever. Wong says that it was literally mentioned in the books that only the Sorcerer Supreme has access to (which Strange was). If Strange did his homework, he could have taken out Thanos and reversed the snap by himself.
I love this channel so much
Wow
cool
i like it
Nice
I love channel is really helpful and nice to see you for sharing.
As a fan of Taika's earlier films (except maybe Eagle vs Shark) it pains me to agree with pretty much everything you say here. How sad. Hope he gets his mojo back. Anyway, great analysis. Keep up the good work. That's all...
Great spot on analysis, I agree 100% with everything you said!
I absolutely loved the visuals when Gorr would make the shadows stretch and turn into those creepy monsters, I just wish they had done more with it. Honestly Gorr barely even felt like a threat in this movie when he should’ve been a huge threat considering he can bend shadows to his own will. I feel like thats a pretty efficient power to have and it was wasted in this movie
Finally it's here after so long :
ruclips.net/video/mCfYi7634rU/видео.html
They literally butchered gorr for pg -13 rating and some feminism bullshit i don't know how the hell can Valkyrie fight against gorr.they butchered necrosword as well the sword which can cut through celestial armour is destroyed by hammer
They've done this too often. Take a top-tier incredibly dangerous enemy and turn them in to a villain-of-the-week type deal that seems to be no threat whatsoever. We barely even saw him do anything. No wonder Zeus didn't give a damn.
Agreed. The original Gorr? In Bale's skin? Yes, please. That would have been worthy.
True, they gave up the character for a PG-13. I guess you need to pump those numbers up.
I dunno what went on in the comics, but to me, in this movie, I just really couldn't help but laugh at him. He just kinda came across as a needlessly racist (my god was bad, so all gods bad), and way way too edgy character who was barely saved by the acting.
You know something is seriously wrong when The Drinker feels the need to define what a scene is first
Lol! Agreed
Anything to artificially make a video over 10 minutes
I did not know the definition of a scene before this, its important to solidify the foundation of your argument before going through with it
@@ShandoGuardian that's sad
@@chriswp5087 are you expecting every viewer of this video to know what a scene is?
Watching that theatre scene in the movie totally reminded me of James Corden's 4D theatre skid with the Thor-cast as part of one his Late Late Night Shows.
But that at least elicited some laughter, this one felt like a remake of a remake.
Gorr in comic was pretty impressive character. Dangerous, treatening, but understandable in term of his motivation. And they turn alien who basically slayed almost all gods in univers into THIS?!
“Maybe you should dial back the comedy a bit and not overdo it”
Taika: Nah it’ll be fine!
Taika: "Naaaah, cut us a line."
"I'll ruin your film in a minute baby"
Screen Rant: "I'm going to need you to get way off my back"
Was that comedy though or just buffoonery?
So Taika Waititi wasn’t acting in “Free Guy”, that was just him being himself.
a narcisist who reject other people opinion?
Yea, he needs to work in a framework. I really loved Jojo Rabbit, I think it is a fantastic movie! And then you get something like Love and Thunder...
I think the early scene with the GOtG in Love + Thunder could have worked. It could have been pulled off if it was a dream sequence, or a poor retelling of what actually happened by an over-enthusiastic character. After the scene ends, you have a scene with two characters - the over-enthusiastic storyteller, and a non-believing listener. "There's no way that happened" - "no, I swear it really happened that way", etc. The scene would have had its entertainment value, but the sense of relief I would have felt knowing it was just a fantasy would have been immense. I thought it was effing ridiculous, that that scene was supposed to be something that actually happened.