How do we know time doesn't stop? What if time stopped across the universe multiple times and everything freezes but because we're all frozen we don't know that time had frozen only to restart? Only an outsider observer could see us freezing, restarting, freezing, restarting etc.
You can pause a movie, but the characters in the movie won't know it was ever paused. The future and the past already exist. This is the basis for prophecy. We are just the observers making it all real.
It fascinates me that channel owners who have to rely on click bait and know nothing about science are obsessed with the idea that science scares scientists.
Time will end when there's no reference point anymore in the universe. No mass, no reference point, no distance, therefore time will no longer be relevant.
@@mike7652in all reality, time is a human concept used to measure when things happen and how long they take to happen, among other things. The fact that weird things happen to time and that time is relative proves that. So if we as humans use time to measure things that happen in our lives, then if there is nothing to measure, time has stopped existing
It just seems crazy to think a lot more people are trying to perceive the inconceivable things of existence. It’s like the cells in our body trying perceive the outside world really. Imagine if our cells had a independence or free will without a order there wouldn’t be a existence at all but chaos.
yeah but if you really think about it, we’re really a representation of the cells in our body, acting as one to perceive and understand the outside world. The microsocopic neural networks that feed instructions to us, are living their “free will” through our human bodies 😅
Although time is relative to the person experiencing it, it’s still a real thing. It’s considered part of the fourth dimension. Look into Einstein’s equations more. In the next dimension up, everything exists past present and future all at once. It may not make sense to us but it’s there. You ever seen the movie interstellar? When they’re on Miller’s planet? Time is the measurement of entropy.
@@shellybunnii You just pointed out the reason a unified theory is currently impossible with these current false theories. Time is not the 4th dimension and 4th dimensional beings cannot see all past, present and future events. We experience everything in the current, present tense. Our mind is the best understandable example of the 4th dimension as information can be stored in an infinite space that would also be considered an unaccessible realm from our 3rd dimension. You have the ability to remember the past and possibly create the future in this hypothetical 4th dimensional space while physically existing in the 3rd dimension.
@@shellybunnii time is a unit of measure humans have created to organize ourselves. It is not a universal law binding everything in existence. I hope this helps
Not really. Time is a measurement of energy transfer. The amount of energy is always universally constant, it just takes different forms. Time measures energy kinda like map.
Exactly, it's not that time is a dimension, it's just how we observe and mark change. Imagine living on a tidal locked world, as a species that doesn't show signs of aging, in a galaxy that can't see other stars and your planet is the only one in your galaxy, how would you mark time... Answer, you can't, so to say that time is the 4th dimension to be conquered is a false, it can't be conquered because it doesn't exist
@@sbritton1313 You need to read "A Brief History of Time" by Stephen Hawking. Even in that extremely unlikely world you give in your example, events would occur in order. We're assuming that these life forms (who do not age???) can move about. Of course there would be entropy. There would still be "Prior to" and "afterwards".
@@JiaruiChen_aren't you a braniac? The number line on the positive side? +~infinity , time is an infinite progression, measured by logical humans not Illogical school boys.❤❤❤😂😂🎉
I was a drivers Ed instructor. I explained driving to be an exercise in 4 dimensions, with time as the 4th dimension. When you drive you have constantly not only asses where you are in space (X,Y,Z axis) in relationship to other cars in space (X,Y,Z axis), but also where you and the other cars will be in space at any given point in time (Generally the immediate future time). Simply, when do you need to change lanes to pass another car, so that you don't hit it. But it can become much more complicated.
Proposed counter-argument to the "Arrow of Time flows in both directions" statement: While there is a vector and magnitude to features of time, like Entropy and Cause-and-Effect, time itself is a distance between two events, just as space is a distance between two objects. While we can have movement (vector and magnitude) in space, there is no set "direction." What is "forward" in space other than an abstract orientation that we've imposed on some imaginary grid? In other words, the Arrow of Time doesn't flow in both directions, but direction is an abstract perception.
Time exists because consciousness created the concept of past, present and future, otherwise everything that happens in the universe is occurring simultaneously with no separation of events.
If time doesn't exist, then trying to control it may be the issue there. But Idk, perception tells us it's there. Is it some sort of an illusion? 🤷♂️ 🫣
Time travel is not about going into the past or the future then returning to the present which is not possible in a single universe but jumping into another universe which is running parallel to ours with a similar history but their time is not in sync with ours where their current time is several years into the future or into the past in their historical timeline. We can jump into their current timeline and do things to alter their future probabilities then return back to our current time which might be the moment we left or sometime in the future but we cannot go backwards in time to the moment we left our universe.@@TurdFerguson456
They reckon we can build a time machine and then we can go forward or back whenever we please. Even pause time as long as we're inside this machine....
What if the same scientists in the future return to our current time and smash all the time machines and destroy the schematics? Does this not create a paradox where the scientist vanish from existence since there are no time machines in the future for them to use ? @@White_Night_Demon
Our minds aren’t equipped to handle a possibility of time without a beginning. In the case of infinite time, our first impulse is to think, ok, when did it begin being infinite? What started it?
No, your watch, if you fell into a black hole, would in your own eyes, continue to run just fine, so long as you were still far enough from the singularity to be alive. You and the watch are moving in the same way, so it will always look to you as though it's working fine. "Time" for your watch will be the same as "time" for your brain. An observer at some other location watching you, though, might see your watch slow down. You won't necessarily be moving in the same way he or she is. This is an important point - motion at high speeds doesn't change the person or object moving - it only changes how other observers, not moving at that speed, things regarding that first subject. Also, note that if the stuff you're describing there near the end (objects teleporting, being in more than one place at a time, etc.) would also apply to the molecules of your body. Your chances of surviving such a thing would be slim to none. If your heart suddenly teleports to "over yonder," you won't last much longer.
Time is a definition. The instant that we defined the metre, all the planets in the Universe instantly had dimensions in metres. If we say it is 13:28 then that is the time on every single place in the universe. It's a definition! Looking at a clock is not a sensible argument - if that clock is a digital clock then all you see is a single, uniform time.....
@@chickenduckquack I'm afraid that's not quite right. Time shows up in two different ways in discussions of relativity. There is coordinate time - that's just one of the four labels (along with the three labels of coordinate position) that we use to label events in spacetime. You're right that that's basically a definition - there's an infinite number of ways you can choose those labels, and even an infinite number of them that are such that the coordinates all transform the way we like for them to in relativity theory (Lorentz transformation). You can pick any one of these you want to when you're solving a problem. Then there is "proper time." Everyone has their own personal proper time. How your proper time relates to the coordinate labels of all of the events depends on how you move around in spacetime. Your proper time is simply the time that would be read off by a (good, trustworthy) clock that you carry around with you - that is, it moves like you do. But we could meet up in the morning, sync our proper time clocks, then go about our business (moving about in different ways) and meet up again for dinner. At both of those meetings we share the same coordinate labels, but we will have experienced different amounts of proper time. The Twin "Paradox" is the classic example of this. I get the strong impression you haven't actually studied this stuff. If you gave it a try you'd likely find it's not so bad - for special relativity at least you really don't need more than high school algebra, so if you paid attention in high school you can handle it. Try doing that before you toss out declarations about it all.
@@KipIngram Spacetime needs a rethink too. It is perfectly possible to have spacetime as a mathmatical argument - after all t is just a variable, but unlike dimensions time isn't real so any conclusions that you make are going to need justifying. 'Spacetime' is something that falls from peoples lips with the assumption that because some scientists said i then it must be true. Time can't have direction in reality - Time is just a number on a clock. There is only one time - as it is a definition - in the same way that there is only one metre. So only the clock we designate as the master 'time' is correct. We don't 'experience' time, because it isn't real. Our bodies feel and age through our environment so the 'man in a spceship' getting younger is simply not possible. You cannot 'feel' time, or smell it OR measure it. Any time effect you think you have experienced is just in your mind, perhaps you are attuned to looking for subconcious clocks - a monotonous job sat a desk has nothing moving about you so 'time' sems to drag but when there is action, say at a party, and things are moving around you then 'time' flies. I can't get far into 'relativity' because the authors are clearly not thinking about what time actually is. The glib 'spacetime' and time dilation are all at odds with the definition of time. You can't alter time - it isn't real - we made it up! The presumption that a clock 'measures' time is also false but clocks are happily used in 'experiments' as a device for 'measuring' time. They don't they DEFINE our time - at least one clock does! The many paradoxes I suspect are down to not understanding time. Think on this - only humans use time - time is irrelevant to all other creatures and matter. No chimp wants to meet his mate at 2:30 tomorrow. Birds don't have calendars. Meteorites don't want to achieve any specific speed, volcanos have no time table. Humans also use time to study their environment - we invented velocity and acceleration - nothing else is interested. There is also only NOW and in that now Energy moves (some) masses about - simplicity rules.
If time and gravity are the same thing, for the sake of argument, could it mean that we ourselves produce gravity by our energy (mental or physical) and it causes time to pass at different rates for us individually. Instead of simply being affected by it, the atoms that make up everything in the universe are actually gravity itself and time is what we are causing?
You're right. Nothing(ness) implies a "lack of boundary conditions", which is the same thing as "infinity", or more precisely, a primordial infinity (primordial meaning it contains all other possible infinities).
If the world should stop revolving spinning slowly down to die I'd spend the end with you And when the world was through Then one by one the stars would all go out Then you and I would simply fly away -- "If" by Bread, 1971
The Universe is Consciousness. Time isn't what's on a clock, it's conscious experience. As long as Consciousness is present, time will be present and Consciousness is timeless because it created time by experiencing it.
Bravo I have heard many versions of this song Yet this is the BEST version in my opinion I am 70++ I have seen many HK old and new movies using this song as back ground music Very strong spirit and impression Nostagia Chinese music forever Best Regards From Indonesia❤
(15:45) Massless particles--I just don't understand that concept. It just seems contradictory. If something is a "particle," then at some level, doesn't it have to have mass?
One would think. I suppose particle may be the wrong word to describe photons. Maybe little points of energy that can also exist as a wave would be better.
@@bassmanjr100 My point was that the time dimension allows changes to take place. Once time stops there can be no further collapse into a singularity or change of any kind.
To the people who think time is a creation of the human mind or a concept, no. The measurement of time is what we created, we created clocks. Time exists whether we perceive it or not. Time is not the abstract representation of 1:30 pm.
The universe doesn't go by time. There's not one need for time to even exist for it to matter. For every action there's a reaction. That's it. Time never was until man, end of story.
@@finalthought3888 On the contrary. Everything goes by time. I takes time for plants and organisms to develop. It takes time time for rain to fall. There is time for leaves to grow, flowers to bloom and leaves to fall. There is time for birds to hatch and to migrate. Time exists. Everyone who claims otherwise is silly.
@@hannahsdrawings8664 As I'll say again, for every action, there's a reaction. It's that simple. Things only exist the way they exist. Nature doesn't go by time.Time is a concept to measure a sequence of events. We use time as a tool, a frame of reference. Silly people believe time always was. You're talking about organisms, rain drops falling and bird migrations? So it also took 4 billion years to get to that point too huh? Because time needed a planet to start with first, right? It's like everything else, now that we're here, our consciousness needed to create structured relevance. Planning. Night, day, summer, fall and winter. So no, time didn't exist and if it did, who went by it??
@@finalthought3888 You really need more examples of time? How will you explain that changes last exactly the same amount of time, this time is needed to reach the same result. How would you call this thing? This thing is time. Each species of mammals has specific amount of time of pregnancy, elephants 660 days, zebras 390 days. Without this certain time factor action do not reach the optimal result. Explain that? What is it for you? If not time. I'm sure you have no knowledge of anything else, because it is certain time and nothing else, each process has to last this certain time. If you do not feel the difference between taking shower for 10 minutes and bath for 20 minutes. If don't feel the time when something lasts seconds and other thing last hours then it's your health condition. I feel the time like everyone who is not a liar.
What if, ultimately, all matter is swallowed into black holes and all of those black holes eventually combine? Is there any thought experiment on whether a black hole has a density threshold, where matter explodes into existence again?
Most people don't think abt it this way, yet it's an intriguing fact: when we die, in a way our bodies still exist , but in a different form. We disintegrate, become a part of the Earth, our atoms bonding to the matter occupying our universe. Before we were born, the universe was a little smaller. Extend this ongoing process over hundreds of thousands of years, and the cosmos grows. A process of new matter emerging from nothing. So, by the law of conservation of mass, our organic existence has permanence.
How are you gonna mention the law of conservation of mass right after saying something as wild as ‘new matter emerges from nothing’. That’s literally not possible. When we are born there is no new matter being created. It’s repurposed matter.
Its Crunch Time! Lol.... yea u don't understand anything. Just because something is Clickbaity doesn't mean it's not true.... darn ya just got schooled by a fool....
How is it clickbait?? Just because you’re a feeble minded fool doesn’t make this clickbait retard! Go read a bible I’m sure that one will make sense to you lol😂😂😂
What is, always has been, and always will be. The past, present and future exist simultaneously. Change is simply an observer moving through this reality and observing.
@bassmanjr100 great question, a full life creates a legacy in your name of remembrance. Knowing after you're not living that you can still help people is what it's all about. After you're dead, you're still living if you truly lived a full life. ✨️ death is only the beginning of what you can create 100, 1000, 10k years from now if you did it right or the best of your abilities.
@WeylandLabs - a life well lived is inconsequential. After the heat death inevitably everything was meaningless. Good deeds, bad deeds, hopes, joy, suffering - everything.
What would it actually _mean_ for there to be an end of time, or a beginning? The universe might well be eternal, but not necessarily in its present form or with its present set of natural laws and constants.
I think a popular misconception is in play here. It has to do with how we define time in modern physics. We use it like a coordinate. Think for a minute about another coordinate system - the terrestrial latitude and longitude system. You can use it to label every point on Earth's surface. Of course, there are points not on Earth's surface. Take Tycho crater on the moon, for example. It just doesn't "fit into" the terrestrial lat/long system. This is how time behaves in modern physics - it's actually part of a coordinate labeling of spacetime itself, and therefore cannot capture any "place" that's not part of spacetime. That's ok, because we currently don't of any place that's not part of spacetime. If we someday incorporate such things into physics, we'll have to have a new coordinate system that maps it, and perhaps our spacetime coordinate system will be contained within that, the same way the lat/long system would be contained in a 3D mapping of the solar system. These time labels don't correspond in a rigorous way with your perception of time. In daily life they do, pretty well at least, because we never move very fast. But if you could move near the speed of light, then the amount of time you while moving between two points in spacetime coordinates will depend on the path you follow in between them. So this "coordinate time" is the full story of time as we experience it. So, just because "time began at the Big Bang" does not mean that nothing happened "before" the Big Bang. It just means our conventional way of laying down coordinates doesn't extend to that "before." This is a "mystery" that we've imposed upon ourselves by the way we've chosen to do our physics.
If we think of the atoms as standing waves in time with the absorption and emission of light forming the passage of time. Light is a wave over a ‘period of time’ with particle characteristics relative to the atoms of the Periodic Table when it is absorbed and emitted. Whenever our three dimensional world changes there is the exchange of photon energy. Another way of saying this, is that whenever our three-dimensional world changes there is an exchange of photon ∆E=hf energy with potential energy transforming into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons as an uncertain ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π probabilistic future unfolds.
Time is not a virtue. It is just a tool. Relative not absolute. No beginning no end always forever connected. The only beginning is the beginning of the awakening to truth and reality & the only end is the end of ignorance that once eluded us. We are the first the last the internal external hidden & manifest. Death implies life and life implies death they go together like the front and back.
I suppose it depends on what kind of time we are talking about. If time is a measurement, then either the measurement is useful to us or it is not. Does time begin at the big bang because that is our reference? Should we discover something before the big bang, does time begin there? Since useful measurements require a "reference" to have any meaning to us, does this mean time is eternal, but useful time has beginnings or ends to reference to and without them time is meaningless to us? The universe is supposedly headed for heat death, which is a state where energy loses all ability to do work. The energy is still there, time without a reference is still there, so would we consider that the end of time meaning the end of "useful" time?
The big bang is not how everything came to be and there's proof in galaxies that are far older than that insane nonsense. Only a human could make that up, think they're the most intelligent creature in existence, and therefore correct in their assumptions. We know nothing. Just because we have big bombs and iPhones doesn't change that.
@@gabrielgabriel5177 When I was a kid I read that Noddy and Big Ears created Noddy's house. I didn't believe that either ... but hey, it was in the book; colour illustrations too~!
I had a heated discussion with my algebra professor in college. She said that div/0 was undefined. I suggested that "undefined" didn't make sense and that "infinity" was the logical interpretation. She started getting angry, so I clammed up. Oh well.
Dividing by zero could equally well be very logically be infinity, minus infinity or zero. Hence it is undefined. Let’s say you divide 5 by a very small positive number. You get something very large. Now divide it by an even smaller positive number, it becomes even larger. Hence your thought that infinity is a logical idea. But now do the same with a very small negative number… it becomes minus infinity! Another logical approach would be to take zero and divide it by any number: it is also zero! So zero divided by zero must also be zero right? So now dividing by zero can be infinity, minus infinity and zero, all at the same time. The only logical conclusion is that dividing by zero makes no sense and it is undefined.
Does the future exist? If the future exists, isn't everything already predestined? If everything is predestined then it must have happened somewhere else already. What if there are multiple futures, but we can only choose one? You have to understand the concept of the future, in order to understand the past. But you can only understand one past, which means you're probably not getting the full picture anyways. Why we need to remember the future or past is the wrong question. And we don't "need" to remember anything. It's just one mechanism that allows us to survive. Although we don't need to remember to breathe, which is really strange, considering how vital breathing is... we just do it.
Maybe there’s a distinguishing difference between chronological time, which is three dimensional based, and some other form of time that is somehow stagnant yet eternal. Without the combination of any distance and any motion there really can be no chronological time perceived in three dimensions. Yet, in some other dimension that entire motionless distance-less construct can still be observed….
Hmmm. A simulation theory adherent would point out that time is an arbitrary construct reflecting the nature of the simulation: just as all matters boils down to a binary (zeros & ones) underlying construct (with, bizarrely a CRC 'error correction' check!), in the same way time is simply there to prop up the SIM. Science has some interesting tangents at the mo.
Time does not exist. Motion creates illusion of time. Motion affects rate at which time passes. Anything which affects motion affects time. Motion is always in forward direction so is time.
The sun will rise again The earth will turn to sand Creation's colors seem to fade to gray And you'll see the sickly hands of time Will write your final rhyme And end our memory. Ticking away the moments that make up a dull day You fritter and waste the hours in an offhand way. Is it any wonder I've got too much time on my hands It's tickin' away with my sanity I've got too much time on my hands It's hard to believe such a calamity I've got too much time on my hands And it's tickin' away Tickin' away from me.
It's a measure of experience... literally nothing more. For an object that is unable to (pardon redundant speech here) experience, experience, like a stone, time does not exist. Wear and tear exits, time does not.
@@coreyp9072 minerals do not experience consciousness, precisisive distributed nano particles do. They're affectionately referred to as "God Code" and via electro magnetic record, will tell us information about age, geographical experience, composites, etc.
The universe is the inside of a black hole, time is evedence of that. Movement becomes restricted, such that there will always be a one way directional component pointing to the singularity (future) and we can only see in the other direction (past) movement in any other direction subtracts that speed from the speed of our descent (time dilation) . I made a post on my community page with more details.
Time started to exist, when the humans started to wander about how the universe works. When men will not exist anymore, time will come to an end too. There won't be anyone out there tho argue against that perception or idea, once the universe itself cannot think, ponder, or have any indication otherwise.
@@hannahsdrawings8664 Okay, but animals couldn't care less about the clock ticking, they have no idea about the time passing, just about seasons, they doesn't know they're gonna die someday either... I still think time's on human's mind, nowhere else.
@@vanhelsing5396 Some people measure precisely amount of ingredients and I cook just estimating, that doesn't mean the ingredients have no amounts. Animals have no idea of dying? How can you tell? An old dying dog just lie there doing nothing. What about sad animals? Just because animals do not keep clocks you claim they have no sense of time? Surprisingly many things animals do according to specific time. Hunt, mate, build nests, migrate, ... How would you call the notion other than time. Example - water boiling too shortly - the effect is not hot enough, water boiled too long - vaporated completely. How do you explain other than time what is the difference between reaching those two different results. Time just as air exists whether you think of it or not.
@@vanhelsing5396 Why would anyone think there is no time? Is it part of some religion or philosophy? Is there some esoteric truth saying 'since there is no time then...' ?
All of this comes from Theoretical Physics. Theories that cannot be proved. If it can't be proved, it can't be scrutinised. If it can't be proved or scrutinised, then why are we even talking about it...
Ervin Laszlo suggested that there are three things that cannot exist in a material universe; eternity, infinity, and nothingness. According to Laszlo, in order for something to exist, even if no more than a mental construct it still must “by virtue of inhabiting a material universe have definable boundaries and a measurable mass, even if those boundaries are not yet established and the technology does not yet exist to measure its mass. Eternity, infinity and nothingness fail to meet these prerequisites because if there is no limit to how large something can be and no limit to how small something else can be, the distance between those two things and the time it takes to traverse that distance, can never be measured. BUT, the challenge to this is that the distance and span of time is also NOT ZERO, which automatically and simultaneously cancels out infinite distance, timelessness and nothingness altogether. The question then remains, can something exist forever or be so unfathomably huge or infinitesimally small that it is forever undefinable? The answer is that if time, distance and mass cannot be used to determine the existence of said “thing”, that thing must exist OUTSIDE the observable universe as well as the laws of physics. Under such terms anything that is too big, too small and/or too long lived to ever be calculated could theoretically EXIST, but by necessity must also occupy space in a non-material dimension. When I was a kid I used to sit around pondering the mysteries of life and one day a terrifying thought entered my young mind, along with a wave of excitement that washed over me. I found myself looking at the world around me and asking ‘why is there something rather than nothing? How did all of this come out of nothing at all? How could it, unless nothingness itself doesn’t actually exist?’ Another way to visualize this and have a better understanding of its implications is to ask, does our universe have a boundary line, or does it just go on forever? No one really knows. Even if it does have a boundary, what is on the other side of that boundary? If it is simply a vacuous void of nothingness, then how did our universe, a “somethingness” within that void, come to be? How could anything at all much less an entire material, observable universe manifest within an immaterial void, unless of course, the void itself does not actually exist but is rather an immaterial plenum of consciousness and infinite and indestructible energy that has always been and cannot ever cease to be.
Ok Earth is flat. There’s an ice wall around the ocean and the top of the wall goes on “forever” or want u would call infinity. Nobody has ever been out there far enough to say what’s on the other side (if anything) but I found your comment very interesting.
@@JaGGeR-If the Earth is flat, why can't I see China from Pennsylvania? Have you ever flown commercially? I'm guessing you haven't 😂 Flat-earthers give the rest of us concerned about actual conspiracies a bad rep.
reversing time... I can't envisage it, but for rewinding a recording, I do not believe life is a recording. Life dissolves, whether in acid or history, you can't put Humpty together again.
A solar year is roughly 365 days! 24 solar hours! The moon's phases each month! Yes indeed our celestial bodies do predict "time" as we pecieve it here on earth!
We need mathematics to describe phenomena, build things, etc. Time as a dimension is very useful but has nothing to do with what time is. The Greeks were right, time is just a sequence of causes and effects, all local, only now exists. Past and future are in our minds and mathematics.
What if God operates in infinities. To us there is no end but to God it doesn't even matter to him. He can make time and destroy time but we will always have been here. Mr. X
The biggest issue with scientific explanation is that men refuse to come off the ridiculous big bang theory. Secondly if they do they would lose credibility in the scientific world which is ok when the actual truth is better than a theory that never happened and cannot be proven after all these years. Accept that God created both the infinite universe and us as well. This should be the starting point for all exploration of any kind and perhaps God will reveal more of what he has done. Reading Ecclesiastes 3:11 will leave us with a issue that we cannot solve no matter how smart we think we are.
If there's proton decay then time ends when decayed particles only leave neutrinos that are evenly distributed in space, thus entropy ceases to increase. If we imagine an observer at this point present it would be unable to see change in the environment: thus time has ended. Time is nothing more than the observed change of external reality, a function of entropy
Our universe is a spinning record on record player. We’re in a colossal recursive loop. After the big bang, the start, we expand and grow. As we grow, we simultaneously decay, until we pass a limit, after which we decay faster than we grow,. Finally, dark energy leads to our collapse into an infinitely sense singularity. The boundary at the end and the beginning of our universe, before another cycle of birth, growth, decay, collapse. But what started it all? Something outside of our universe, unconstrained by our laws, apart from our fundamental elements, by definition.
@GaryRine is that why when you punch anything divided by 0 into a calculator you get "error cannot divide by 0" and not "infinity"? You're gonna tell me that math, which deals in certainties and absolutes now doesn't have meaning because there are no constants thanks to this seemingly new change in stance?
@@grin_of_grimmsnarl1333 because if you divide by zero ... you get infinity..... duh.... see what happens when you divide by numbers very close to zero??? do you understand Calculus??
Eisntein hits blunt, "you know what, man. Time is really just a big musical jam session with different rhythms."
The precise moment he stopped combing his hair.
@@bajovatoIt just looks like he didn't use a comb, from our view in time.
@emilposselt5607yeah always
I'm ripping dabs right now and laughing way too much at your comment
@@GetOffTheLawn Glad you liked it.
How do we know time doesn't stop? What if time stopped across the universe multiple times and everything freezes but because we're all frozen we don't know that time had frozen only to restart? Only an outsider observer could see us freezing, restarting, freezing, restarting etc.
You can pause a movie, but the characters in the movie won't know it was ever paused. The future and the past already exist. This is the basis for prophecy. We are just the observers making it all real.
Ifff everything stops moving or freezes as u say then all motion stops therefore time is relative to motion in other words an illusion
You carry boxes don’t you
Because it would be limited & the universe/system is unlimited. No beginning no end always forever connected
Twilight Zone episode #58😅
It fascinates me that channel owners who have to rely on click bait and know nothing about science are obsessed with the idea that science scares scientists.
"Time is an illusion. Leave it up to the human species to invent something that measures something that doesn't exist." - Dolores Cannon
Exactly.
Yea this is so obvious
Time is not illusion. You are
@@awesom-o1570 everything is an illusion.
Been binging her videos! Really life-changing.
Whatever it is, I still have a doctor appt tomorrow at nine.
Now that’s the attitude we need
Yuck the mundane life dude
@@felixcandelaria-hernandez5809 I’m way ahead of you 🤙
😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Time will end when there's no reference point anymore in the universe. No mass, no reference point, no distance, therefore time will no longer be relevant.
Thought 🤔 process takes time...do mean when everyone and everything doesn't exist anymore...
You don't have faith then
Irrelevant doesn't mean nonexistent 🤷
@@mike7652in all reality, time is a human concept used to measure when things happen and how long they take to happen, among other things. The fact that weird things happen to time and that time is relative proves that. So if we as humans use time to measure things that happen in our lives, then if there is nothing to measure, time has stopped existing
Photons don't have time
It just seems crazy to think a lot more people are trying to perceive the inconceivable things of existence. It’s like the cells in our body trying perceive the outside world really. Imagine if our cells had a independence or free will without a order there wouldn’t be a existence at all but chaos.
yeah but if you really think about it, we’re really a representation of the cells in our body, acting as one to perceive and understand the outside world. The microsocopic neural networks that feed instructions to us, are living their “free will” through our human bodies 😅
Wow, so I have no free will
Everyone show their boss this video if you take an extremely long lunch break
Time is only a measurement of motion, it literally only exists inside the human mind. It is not a natural force
Although time is relative to the person experiencing it, it’s still a real thing. It’s considered part of the fourth dimension. Look into Einstein’s equations more. In the next dimension up, everything exists past present and future all at once. It may not make sense to us but it’s there. You ever seen the movie interstellar? When they’re on Miller’s planet? Time is the measurement of entropy.
@@shellybunnii You just pointed out the reason a unified theory is currently impossible with these current false theories. Time is not the 4th dimension and 4th dimensional beings cannot see all past, present and future events. We experience everything in the current, present tense. Our mind is the best understandable example of the 4th dimension as information can be stored in an infinite space that would also be considered an unaccessible realm from our 3rd dimension. You have the ability to remember the past and possibly create the future in this hypothetical 4th dimensional space while physically existing in the 3rd dimension.
@@shellybunnii time is a unit of measure humans have created to organize ourselves. It is not a universal law binding everything in existence. I hope this helps
Not really. Time is a measurement of energy transfer. The amount of energy is always universally constant, it just takes different forms. Time measures energy kinda like map.
hmmm our conscious state simulates time as a way for the physics we have birthed to understand what is
Aristotle defined time as a measurement of the rate of change 😊
Exactly, it's not that time is a dimension, it's just how we observe and mark change. Imagine living on a tidal locked world, as a species that doesn't show signs of aging, in a galaxy that can't see other stars and your planet is the only one in your galaxy, how would you mark time... Answer, you can't, so to say that time is the 4th dimension to be conquered is a false, it can't be conquered because it doesn't exist
so?
@@sbritton1313 You need to read "A Brief History of Time" by Stephen Hawking. Even in that extremely unlikely world you give in your example, events would occur in order. We're assuming that these life forms (who do not age???) can move about. Of course there would be entropy. There would still be "Prior to" and "afterwards".
@@JiaruiChen_aren't you a braniac? The number line on the positive side? +~infinity , time is an infinite progression, measured by logical humans not Illogical school boys.❤❤❤😂😂🎉
I was a drivers Ed instructor. I explained driving to be an exercise in 4 dimensions, with time as the 4th dimension. When you drive you have constantly not only asses where you are in space (X,Y,Z axis) in relationship to other cars in space (X,Y,Z axis), but also where you and the other cars will be in space at any given point in time (Generally the immediate future time). Simply, when do you need to change lanes to pass another car, so that you don't hit it. But it can become much more complicated.
Proposed counter-argument to the "Arrow of Time flows in both directions" statement:
While there is a vector and magnitude to features of time, like Entropy and Cause-and-Effect, time itself is a distance between two events, just as space is a distance between two objects. While we can have movement (vector and magnitude) in space, there is no set "direction." What is "forward" in space other than an abstract orientation that we've imposed on some imaginary grid?
In other words, the Arrow of Time doesn't flow in both directions, but direction is an abstract perception.
Time was invented by man - it has no direction. It isn't a real entity.
@RiiDii...That's pretty good lol🤓
Time exists because consciousness created the concept of past, present and future, otherwise everything that happens in the universe is occurring simultaneously with no separation of events.
What really scares them is that time defeats all their attempts to control it.
If time doesn't exist, then trying to control it may be the issue there. But Idk, perception tells us it's there. Is it some sort of an illusion? 🤷♂️ 🫣
Time travel is not about going into the past or the future then returning to the present which is not possible in a single universe but jumping into another universe which is running parallel to ours with a similar history but their time is not in sync with ours where their current time is several years into the future or into the past in their historical timeline. We can jump into their current timeline and do things to alter their future probabilities then return back to our current time which might be the moment we left or sometime in the future but we cannot go backwards in time to the moment we left our universe.@@TurdFerguson456
I don't think that scares them lol. Not scientists anyway.
Thanks for clickbait
They reckon we can build a time machine and then we can go forward or back whenever we please. Even pause time as long as we're inside this machine....
What if the same scientists in the future return to our current time and smash all the time machines and destroy the schematics? Does this not create a paradox where the scientist vanish from existence since there are no time machines in the future for them to use ? @@White_Night_Demon
Our minds aren’t equipped to handle a possibility of time without a beginning. In the case of infinite time, our first impulse is to think, ok, when did it begin being infinite? What started it?
Yes lols absolutely
People who think time is real and measurable have never waited for a pizza to be delivered.
Amen brother fir real
😆
Eliminate pizza from tour life, find better ways to fulfil you time
Or a love interest to text you 😂
Try waiting for a bus in Liverpool
Great, now im going through an existential crisis
Time will heal your wounds :)
Even if it stops.Then your crisis will end.
I thought time would heal my wounds it only makes them worse 😢
@@Firebird.1991 💯
Why? Since there is no time, it is never too late. What we do now both physically and mentally will affect time before and after us, like ripples.
Relax.., take your time to figure it out…
Absolutely brilliant, thank you for downloading this.
No, your watch, if you fell into a black hole, would in your own eyes, continue to run just fine, so long as you were still far enough from the singularity to be alive. You and the watch are moving in the same way, so it will always look to you as though it's working fine. "Time" for your watch will be the same as "time" for your brain. An observer at some other location watching you, though, might see your watch slow down. You won't necessarily be moving in the same way he or she is. This is an important point - motion at high speeds doesn't change the person or object moving - it only changes how other observers, not moving at that speed, things regarding that first subject.
Also, note that if the stuff you're describing there near the end (objects teleporting, being in more than one place at a time, etc.) would also apply to the molecules of your body. Your chances of surviving such a thing would be slim to none. If your heart suddenly teleports to "over yonder," you won't last much longer.
reminds me of how mirages work. i think gravity and time are endlessly intertwined
Time is a definition. The instant that we defined the metre, all the planets in the Universe instantly had dimensions in metres. If we say it is 13:28 then that is the time on every single place in the universe. It's a definition! Looking at a clock is not a sensible argument - if that clock is a digital clock then all you see is a single, uniform time.....
@@chickenduckquack I'm afraid that's not quite right. Time shows up in two different ways in discussions of relativity. There is coordinate time - that's just one of the four labels (along with the three labels of coordinate position) that we use to label events in spacetime. You're right that that's basically a definition - there's an infinite number of ways you can choose those labels, and even an infinite number of them that are such that the coordinates all transform the way we like for them to in relativity theory (Lorentz transformation). You can pick any one of these you want to when you're solving a problem.
Then there is "proper time." Everyone has their own personal proper time. How your proper time relates to the coordinate labels of all of the events depends on how you move around in spacetime. Your proper time is simply the time that would be read off by a (good, trustworthy) clock that you carry around with you - that is, it moves like you do. But we could meet up in the morning, sync our proper time clocks, then go about our business (moving about in different ways) and meet up again for dinner. At both of those meetings we share the same coordinate labels, but we will have experienced different amounts of proper time. The Twin "Paradox" is the classic example of this.
I get the strong impression you haven't actually studied this stuff. If you gave it a try you'd likely find it's not so bad - for special relativity at least you really don't need more than high school algebra, so if you paid attention in high school you can handle it. Try doing that before you toss out declarations about it all.
@@KipIngram Spacetime needs a rethink too. It is perfectly possible to have spacetime as a mathmatical argument - after all t is just a variable, but unlike dimensions time isn't real so any conclusions that you make are going to need justifying. 'Spacetime' is something that falls from peoples lips with the assumption that because some scientists said i then it must be true. Time can't have direction in reality - Time is just a number on a clock.
There is only one time - as it is a definition - in the same way that there is only one metre. So only the clock we designate as the master 'time' is correct. We don't 'experience' time, because it isn't real. Our bodies feel and age through our environment so the 'man in a spceship' getting younger is simply not possible. You cannot 'feel' time, or smell it OR measure it. Any time effect you think you have experienced is just in your mind, perhaps you are attuned to looking for subconcious clocks - a monotonous job sat a desk has nothing moving about you so 'time' sems to drag but when there is action, say at a party, and things are moving around you then 'time' flies.
I can't get far into 'relativity' because the authors are clearly not thinking about what time actually is. The glib 'spacetime' and time dilation are all at odds with the definition of time. You can't alter time - it isn't real - we made it up! The presumption that a clock 'measures' time is also false but clocks are happily used in 'experiments' as a device for 'measuring' time. They don't they DEFINE our time - at least one clock does! The many paradoxes I suspect are down to not understanding time.
Think on this - only humans use time - time is irrelevant to all other creatures and matter. No chimp wants to meet his mate at 2:30 tomorrow. Birds don't have calendars. Meteorites don't want to achieve any specific speed, volcanos have no time table. Humans also use time to study their environment - we invented velocity and acceleration - nothing else is interested. There is also only NOW and in that now Energy moves (some) masses about - simplicity rules.
If time and gravity are the same thing, for the sake of argument, could it mean
that we ourselves produce gravity by our energy (mental or physical) and it causes time to pass at different rates for us individually. Instead of simply being affected by it, the atoms that make up everything in the universe are actually gravity itself and time is what we are causing?
Did Einstein come up with the theory of AI generated RUclips content?
If there's nothing,then there's something.
You're right. Nothing(ness) implies a "lack of boundary conditions", which is the same thing as "infinity", or more precisely, a primordial infinity (primordial meaning it contains all other possible infinities).
@@xxxYYZxxx my thoughts exactly🤣🤔
Nothing is everything and everything is nothing
And if there is a beginning, there's an end.
@DonnieGoodman-yp8pf there is no end,only the beginning.
Observation of change defines a concept of time. If there are no changes, no time can be defined.
According to Aristotle. But that was long ago.
These are the kinds of imaginings that arise in the minds of those who try to understand what they have no prepared themselves morally to understand.
Thank you for sharing this video that was a brilliant topic. Great presentation. ❤
People Makes Time, but not for what's important 💌✌️
Great video...dont know about the Charlie Brown music though in background
If the world should stop revolving spinning slowly down to die
I'd spend the end with you
And when the world was through
Then one by one the stars would all go out
Then you and I would simply fly away
-- "If" by Bread, 1971
Time is man made so I wouldn’t have thought that the universe has any concept of man made time aaarrrgggghhhh 😱😵💫
The Universe is Consciousness. Time isn't what's on a clock, it's conscious experience. As long as Consciousness is present, time will be present and Consciousness is timeless because it created time by experiencing it.
Non dual and idealism 🙏🏼
@@bodystorm it's actually called Panpsychism, Platonism, and Gnosticism.
C59AC6
@@justinrulf8107 I've always said that. (it's also a hexadecimal code)
The Great Observer, yes?
Bravo
I have heard many versions of this song
Yet this is the BEST version
in my opinion
I am 70++
I have seen many HK old and new movies using this song
as back ground music
Very strong spirit and impression
Nostagia
Chinese music forever
Best Regards
From Indonesia❤
Very interesting, thought provoking and informative. How much did the piano player get paid?
I think the music might be ai, the voice is ai and the script written by ai, spooky.
AI to that !@@Ruby-xk8kn
Pianist was paid for his time.
A FLAT rate I presume?@@milesrudduck
Music is the shorthand of emotion 🤔
I totally agree with every point discussed in this video. I have been studying these topics since I was 3.
Einstein says that "Reality is an illusion."Therefore if relativity is a classical theory,relativity is also an illusion.
Time is relative though.
nice video !!✌👍
(15:45) Massless particles--I just don't understand that concept. It just seems contradictory. If something is a "particle," then at some level, doesn't it have to have mass?
One would think. I suppose particle may be the wrong word to describe photons. Maybe little points of energy that can also exist as a wave would be better.
I think it has to do with how the particle interacts with the Higgs field. If it interacts, it has mass. If it doesn't, there is no mass.
@@bassmanjr100 I have heard it explained that way as well. Every force has a field and carrier particle.
Doesn't time stopping inside a black hole prevent further movement and further collapse? So how does a singularity form?
The gravitational field was in place when the black hole was formed. The field and time stopping happened together. Black holes are not static anyway.
@@bassmanjr100 My point was that the time dimension allows changes to take place. Once time stops there can be no further collapse into a singularity or change of any kind.
To the people who think time is a creation of the human mind or a concept, no. The measurement of time is what we created, we created clocks. Time exists whether we perceive it or not. Time is not the abstract representation of 1:30 pm.
Thank you. I'm reading the comments and I finally found one that is not a waste of my time😊.
The universe doesn't go by time. There's not one need for time to even exist for it to matter. For every action there's a reaction. That's it. Time never was until man, end of story.
@@finalthought3888 On the contrary. Everything goes by time. I takes time for plants and organisms to develop. It takes time time for rain to fall. There is time for leaves to grow, flowers to bloom and leaves to fall. There is time for birds to hatch and to migrate. Time exists. Everyone who claims otherwise is silly.
@@hannahsdrawings8664 As I'll say again, for every action, there's a reaction. It's that simple. Things only exist the way they exist. Nature doesn't go by time.Time is a concept to measure a sequence of events. We use time as a tool, a frame of reference. Silly people believe time always was. You're talking about organisms, rain drops falling and bird migrations? So it also took 4 billion years to get to that point too huh? Because time needed a planet to start with first, right? It's like everything else, now that we're here, our consciousness needed to create structured relevance. Planning. Night, day, summer, fall and winter. So no, time didn't exist and if it did, who went by it??
@@finalthought3888 You really need more examples of time? How will you explain that changes last exactly the same amount of time, this time is needed to reach the same result. How would you call this thing? This thing is time. Each species of mammals has specific amount of time of pregnancy, elephants 660 days, zebras 390 days. Without this certain time factor action do not reach the optimal result. Explain that? What is it for you? If not time. I'm sure you have no knowledge of anything else, because it is certain time and nothing else, each process has to last this certain time. If you do not feel the difference between taking shower for 10 minutes and bath for 20 minutes. If don't feel the time when something lasts seconds and other thing last hours then it's your health condition. I feel the time like everyone who is not a liar.
What if, ultimately, all matter is swallowed into black holes and all of those black holes eventually combine? Is there any thought experiment on whether a black hole has a density threshold, where matter explodes into existence again?
Most people don't think abt it this way, yet it's an intriguing fact: when we die, in a way our bodies still exist , but in a different form. We disintegrate, become a part of the Earth, our atoms bonding to the matter occupying our universe. Before we were born, the universe was a little smaller. Extend this ongoing process over hundreds of thousands of years, and the cosmos grows. A process of new matter emerging from nothing. So, by the law of conservation of mass, our organic existence has permanence.
@@TheLastWon-ku2vf Never thought of it so, in depth. Thank you for that and may using it, improve the outcome of my next MEANing...
How are you gonna mention the law of conservation of mass right after saying something as wild as ‘new matter emerges from nothing’. That’s literally not possible. When we are born there is no new matter being created. It’s repurposed matter.
So in essence we are everything and we are one. All connected to something bigger
ALL matter - organic and inorganic. In Carl Sagan's words, "we are star stuff".@@corbinrodgers3325
@@corbinrodgers3325yea but only when u die lol
well done dude. a lot of this seems to come closely from popular articles, so references could be good
I hate clickbaity titles.
You don’t understand the video or the concept of time.
Its Crunch Time! Lol.... yea u don't understand anything. Just because something is Clickbaity doesn't mean it's not true.... darn ya just got schooled by a fool....
Gullible lol
How is it clickbait??
Just because you’re a feeble minded fool doesn’t make this clickbait retard! Go read a bible I’m sure that one will make sense to you lol😂😂😂
Very interesting. Well done.
Time exists because I’m able to check what time it is at anytime .
Great 👍 show
We 'are' falling into a Blackhole which is why with time dilation Galaxies are always speeding up.
Amazing RESEARCH!👍👍👍👍
Consider the Universe a loaf of bread galaxies are the yeast and stars are the gluten. : The theory of Breaditivity.
But who baked the bread?
@@bassmanjr100 the Swedish Chef off the muppets?
Hope do we actually measure time? What is the input and how do we measure slow down etc
What is, always has been, and always will be. The past, present and future exist simultaneously. Change is simply an observer moving through this reality and observing.
@jonncockrell... Like the Led Zep quote... also you have a good idea, I like it!
name of music in the background?
Being scared of time only happens with regret of not experiencing a full life.
But what is a full life? One second after that life is over, what difference does it make whether it was full or not to the person that lived it?
@bassmanjr100 great question, a full life creates a legacy in your name of remembrance. Knowing after you're not living that you can still help people is what it's all about. After you're dead, you're still living if you truly lived a full life. ✨️
death is only the beginning of what you can create 100, 1000, 10k years from now if you did it right or the best of your abilities.
@bassmanjr100 - well said.
@WeylandLabs - a life well lived is inconsequential. After the heat death inevitably everything was meaningless. Good deeds, bad deeds, hopes, joy, suffering - everything.
Great channel
So fricin scary!! This can put someone into shock.
Time ends when a person dies
The perception of time dies. Not time.
Space does not conform to the time we perceive. Space exists outside of the boundaries of time.Time does not apply to space because its timeless.
It takes circa 8 minutes for sunlight to get to Earth.
What would it actually _mean_ for there to be an end of time, or a beginning? The universe might well be eternal, but not necessarily in its present form or with its present set of natural laws and constants.
I think a popular misconception is in play here. It has to do with how we define time in modern physics. We use it like a coordinate. Think for a minute about another coordinate system - the terrestrial latitude and longitude system. You can use it to label every point on Earth's surface. Of course, there are points not on Earth's surface. Take Tycho crater on the moon, for example. It just doesn't "fit into" the terrestrial lat/long system. This is how time behaves in modern physics - it's actually part of a coordinate labeling of spacetime itself, and therefore cannot capture any "place" that's not part of spacetime. That's ok, because we currently don't of any place that's not part of spacetime. If we someday incorporate such things into physics, we'll have to have a new coordinate system that maps it, and perhaps our spacetime coordinate system will be contained within that, the same way the lat/long system would be contained in a 3D mapping of the solar system.
These time labels don't correspond in a rigorous way with your perception of time. In daily life they do, pretty well at least, because we never move very fast. But if you could move near the speed of light, then the amount of time you while moving between two points in spacetime coordinates will depend on the path you follow in between them. So this "coordinate time" is the full story of time as we experience it. So, just because "time began at the Big Bang" does not mean that nothing happened "before" the Big Bang. It just means our conventional way of laying down coordinates doesn't extend to that "before." This is a "mystery" that we've imposed upon ourselves by the way we've chosen to do our physics.
Yes. Us understanding what is beyond spacetime will likely help us figure out what time really is
What about going back in time?
That's not allowed. It's against the law, the law of Relativity.
If you want to travel faster than light speed, you will need to figure that out.
"And with strange aeons even death may die."
If we think of the atoms as standing waves in time with the absorption and emission of light forming the passage of time. Light is a wave over a ‘period of time’ with particle characteristics relative to the atoms of the Periodic Table when it is absorbed and emitted. Whenever our three dimensional world changes there is the exchange of photon energy. Another way of saying this, is that whenever our three-dimensional world changes there is an exchange of photon ∆E=hf energy with potential energy transforming into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons as an uncertain ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π probabilistic future unfolds.
Time is not a virtue. It is just a tool. Relative not absolute. No beginning no end always forever connected.
The only beginning is the beginning of the awakening to truth and reality & the only end is the end of ignorance that once eluded us. We are the first the last the internal external hidden & manifest. Death implies life and life implies death they go together like the front and back.
I suppose it depends on what kind of time we are talking about. If time is a measurement, then either the measurement is useful to us or it is not. Does time begin at the big bang because that is our reference? Should we discover something before the big bang, does time begin there? Since useful measurements require a "reference" to have any meaning to us, does this mean time is eternal, but useful time has beginnings or ends to reference to and without them time is meaningless to us? The universe is supposedly headed for heat death, which is a state where energy loses all ability to do work. The energy is still there, time without a reference is still there, so would we consider that the end of time meaning the end of "useful" time?
The big bang is not how everything came to be and there's proof in galaxies that are far older than that insane nonsense. Only a human could make that up, think they're the most intelligent creature in existence, and therefore correct in their assumptions. We know nothing. Just because we have big bombs and iPhones doesn't change that.
Universe (god) bless you all
Hah! The Duty religious Nutter strikes!
It took you long enough ... this time ...
Universe is not god. That is clear heresy. The Holy Scriptures and fathers teach us that God created the universe.
@@gabrielgabriel5177 your holy scriptures are the product of uneducated people trying to explain the universe.
@@gabrielgabriel5177 Then who created God?
@@gabrielgabriel5177 When I was a kid I read that Noddy and Big Ears created Noddy's house. I didn't believe that either ...
but hey, it was in the book; colour illustrations too~!
I had a heated discussion with my algebra professor in college. She said that div/0 was undefined. I suggested that "undefined" didn't make sense and that "infinity" was the logical interpretation. She started getting angry, so I clammed up. Oh well.
Dividing by zero could equally well be very logically be infinity, minus infinity or zero. Hence it is undefined.
Let’s say you divide 5 by a very small positive number. You get something very large. Now divide it by an even smaller positive number, it becomes even larger. Hence your thought that infinity is a logical idea. But now do the same with a very small negative number… it becomes minus infinity! Another logical approach would be to take zero and divide it by any number: it is also zero! So zero divided by zero must also be zero right? So now dividing by zero can be infinity, minus infinity and zero, all at the same time.
The only logical conclusion is that dividing by zero makes no sense and it is undefined.
If there's no time, why the need to remember the past or imagine the future?
Does the future exist? If the future exists, isn't everything already predestined? If everything is predestined then it must have happened somewhere else already. What if there are multiple futures, but we can only choose one? You have to understand the concept of the future, in order to understand the past. But you can only understand one past, which means you're probably not getting the full picture anyways. Why we need to remember the future or past is the wrong question. And we don't "need" to remember anything. It's just one mechanism that allows us to survive. Although we don't need to remember to breathe, which is really strange, considering how vital breathing is... we just do it.
Maybe there’s a distinguishing difference between chronological time, which is three dimensional based, and some other form of time that is somehow stagnant yet eternal. Without the combination of any distance and any motion there really can be no chronological time perceived in three dimensions. Yet, in some other dimension that entire motionless distance-less construct can still be observed….
These A.I voice overs do my head in. Theres not enough pauses they just rabbit on and after a minute I switch off
What time is it.... 00:00 o'clock
God's Creation for all Eternity ❤😊❤🙏🌏🌕🌔🌛⭐🌌
Gobledeeeegooook
🙄🙄🙄
Hmmm.
A simulation theory adherent would point out that time is an arbitrary construct reflecting the nature of the simulation: just as all matters boils down to a binary (zeros & ones) underlying construct (with, bizarrely a CRC 'error correction' check!), in the same way time is simply there to prop up the SIM.
Science has some interesting tangents at the mo.
Big bang only kicks off time in the physical dimension aka time that we can physically measure. NOT time itself
Time does not exist. Motion creates illusion of time. Motion affects rate at which time passes. Anything which affects motion affects time. Motion is always in forward direction so is time.
The sun will rise again
The earth will turn to sand
Creation's colors seem to fade to gray
And you'll see the sickly hands of time
Will write your final rhyme
And end our memory.
Ticking away the moments that make up a dull day
You fritter and waste the hours in an offhand way.
Is it any wonder I've got too much time on my hands
It's tickin' away with my sanity
I've got too much time on my hands
It's hard to believe such a calamity
I've got too much time on my hands
And it's tickin' away
Tickin' away from me.
This video earned my subscription.
Same
It's a measure of experience... literally nothing more. For an object that is unable to (pardon redundant speech here) experience, experience, like a stone, time does not exist. Wear and tear exits, time does not.
A rock has experience as well, not in the way that we do but even a rock has a level of consciousness
@@coreyp9072 minerals do not experience consciousness, precisisive distributed nano particles do. They're affectionately referred to as "God Code" and via electro magnetic record, will tell us information about age, geographical experience, composites, etc.
If time causes gravity and time ends at a singularity then why does the singularity (black hole) cause attraction (gravity) ?
The gravitational field and singularity and time stopping all happens simultaneously when the black hole is formed.
The universe is the inside of a black hole, time is evedence of that. Movement becomes restricted, such that there will always be a one way directional component pointing to the singularity (future) and we can only see in the other direction (past) movement in any other direction subtracts that speed from the speed of our descent (time dilation) .
I made a post on my community page with more details.
Ok but what’s outside that black hole? Another universe? Then is that universe in a black hole? Then what’s outside that?
Our ability to understand the universe is in it's infancy...we truly have no idea at all.
Time started to exist, when the humans started to wander about how the universe works. When men will not exist anymore, time will come to an end too. There won't be anyone out there tho argue against that perception or idea, once the universe itself cannot think, ponder, or have any indication otherwise.
Nah man, butterflies will still live 2 weeks and elephants 60 years no matter whether there will be a single person to realize that.
@@hannahsdrawings8664 Okay, but animals couldn't care less about the clock ticking, they have no idea about the time passing, just about seasons, they doesn't know they're gonna die someday either... I still think time's on human's mind, nowhere else.
@@vanhelsing5396 Some people measure precisely amount of ingredients and I cook just estimating, that doesn't mean the ingredients have no amounts.
Animals have no idea of dying? How can you tell? An old dying dog just lie there doing nothing. What about sad animals? Just because animals do not keep clocks you claim they have no sense of time? Surprisingly many things animals do according to specific time. Hunt, mate, build nests, migrate, ...
How would you call the notion other than time. Example - water boiling too shortly - the effect is not hot enough, water boiled too long - vaporated completely. How do you explain other than time what is the difference between reaching those two different results. Time just as air exists whether you think of it or not.
@@hannahsdrawings8664 Well, you've got me there. Perhaps you're right, and I'm wrong. God only knows for sure. Truce...
@@vanhelsing5396 Why would anyone think there is no time? Is it part of some religion or philosophy? Is there some esoteric truth saying 'since there is no time then...' ?
No thing need us to be, but We are what feels what We call Time Because we only have so much Time,I wonder why We don't love it More.
All of this comes from Theoretical Physics.
Theories that cannot be proved.
If it can't be proved, it can't be scrutinised.
If it can't be proved or scrutinised, then why are we even talking about it...
Because everything is a theory until it isn't.
Hi
How to contact you?
Ervin Laszlo suggested that there are three things that cannot exist in a material universe; eternity, infinity, and nothingness. According to Laszlo, in order for something to exist, even if no more than a mental construct it still must “by virtue of inhabiting a material universe have definable boundaries and a measurable mass, even if those boundaries are not yet established and the technology does not yet exist to measure its mass. Eternity, infinity and nothingness fail to meet these prerequisites because if there is no limit to how large something can be and no limit to how small something else can be, the distance between those two things and the time it takes to traverse that distance, can never be measured. BUT, the challenge to this is that the distance and span of time is also NOT ZERO, which automatically and simultaneously cancels out infinite distance, timelessness and nothingness altogether. The question then remains, can something exist forever or be so unfathomably huge or infinitesimally small that it is forever undefinable? The answer is that if time, distance and mass cannot be used to determine the existence of said “thing”, that thing must exist OUTSIDE the observable universe as well as the laws of physics. Under such terms anything that is too big, too small and/or too long lived to ever be calculated could theoretically EXIST, but by necessity must also occupy space in a non-material dimension. When I was a kid I used to sit around pondering the mysteries of life and one day a terrifying thought entered my young mind, along with a wave of excitement that washed over me. I found myself looking at the world around me and asking ‘why is there something rather than nothing? How did all of this come out of nothing at all? How could it, unless nothingness itself doesn’t actually exist?’
Another way to visualize this and have a better understanding of its implications is to ask, does our universe have a boundary line, or does it just go on forever? No one really knows. Even if it does have a boundary, what is on the other side of that boundary? If it is simply a vacuous void of nothingness, then how did our universe, a “somethingness” within that void, come to be? How could anything at all much less an entire material, observable universe manifest within an immaterial void, unless of course, the void itself does not actually exist but is rather an immaterial plenum of consciousness and infinite and indestructible energy that has always been and cannot ever cease to be.
Ok Earth is flat. There’s an ice wall around the ocean and the top of the wall goes on “forever” or want u would call infinity. Nobody has ever been out there far enough to say what’s on the other side (if anything) but I found your comment very interesting.
@@organicsoulgumboyou've lost your commenting privileges for an infinite amount of time.
@@JaGGeR-If the Earth is flat, why can't I see China from Pennsylvania? Have you ever flown commercially? I'm guessing you haven't 😂
Flat-earthers give the rest of us concerned about actual conspiracies a bad rep.
@@mike7652 I'm not a flat-earther. Learn to read.
We are repeating life over and over again, never ending. You are far far older than you know.
reversing time... I can't envisage it, but for rewinding a recording, I do not believe life is a recording. Life dissolves, whether in acid or history, you can't put Humpty together again.
23:03 *OMG that looks SOOOOOOooooo awesome! I wish it kept showing that part longer/*
Time concept Came from Clock,, forget Clock see Sun, Moon,, further Celestial bodies
A solar year is roughly 365 days! 24 solar hours! The moon's phases each month! Yes indeed our celestial bodies do predict "time" as we pecieve it here on earth!
5:45 fascinating!!
This isn’t a paradox, it’s gibberish.
AI generated drivel.
There is always someone who is displeased❗️
YOU must be THE DISPLEASED ONE❗️😕
AS A TOUGHT NOTHING EXIST !! This is ILLUSION !! Toughts does not exist !! 😊😊😊
There is no time there is only constant
I heard and seen of an algorithm that shows what time really is only how and who do you show it to
We need mathematics to describe phenomena, build things, etc. Time as a dimension is very useful but has nothing to do with what time is. The Greeks were right, time is just a sequence of causes and effects, all local, only now exists. Past and future are in our minds and mathematics.
Watching you fiddle with that toolbox like it was the key to opening the vault door somehow was painful 😂
What if God operates in infinities. To us there is no end but to God it doesn't even matter to him. He can make time and destroy time but we will always have been here. Mr. X
Here in Utah God is a license plate so I don’t take God seriously. Believe what you want.
Excellently explained.
The biggest issue with scientific explanation is that men refuse to come off the ridiculous big bang theory. Secondly if they do they would lose credibility in the scientific world which is ok when the actual truth is better than a theory that never happened and cannot be proven after all these years. Accept that God created both the infinite universe and us as well. This should be the starting point for all exploration of any kind and perhaps God will reveal more of what he has done. Reading Ecclesiastes 3:11 will leave us with a issue that we cannot solve no matter how smart we think we are.
everybody gangsta till it go backwards 🤣🤣🤣
If there's proton decay then time ends when decayed particles only leave neutrinos that are evenly distributed in space, thus entropy ceases to increase. If we imagine an observer at this point present it would be unable to see change in the environment: thus time has ended. Time is nothing more than the observed change of external reality, a function of entropy
Our universe is a spinning record on record player. We’re in a colossal recursive loop. After the big bang, the start, we expand and grow. As we grow, we simultaneously decay, until we pass a limit, after which we decay faster than we grow,. Finally, dark energy leads to our collapse into an infinitely sense singularity. The boundary at the end and the beginning of our universe, before another cycle of birth, growth, decay, collapse.
But what started it all? Something outside of our universe, unconstrained by our laws, apart from our fundamental elements, by definition.
So dividing by zero now results in infinity? 🤔
Ummmm... what do you mean by now???? this has been known since the concept of zero was invented...LOL
@@GaryRine you're gonna tell me you didn't go through school being told "you cannot divide by zero?" I call BS.
@GaryRine is that why when you punch anything divided by 0 into a calculator you get "error cannot divide by 0" and not "infinity"? You're gonna tell me that math, which deals in certainties and absolutes now doesn't have meaning because there are no constants thanks to this seemingly new change in stance?
@@grin_of_grimmsnarl1333 because if you divide by zero ... you get infinity..... duh.... see what happens when you divide by numbers very close to zero??? do you understand Calculus??
So time is gravity or control by gravity