Start speaking a new language in 3 weeks with Babbel 🎉. Get up to 65% OFF your subscription ➡️ HERE: go.babbel.com/t?bsc=1200m65-youtube-historyoftheuniverse-july-2022&btp=default&RUclips&Influencer..History%20of%20the%20Universe..USA..RUclips
Two energies that arrive from two sides of the universe can make a collision. So likely, many collisions like that can make a lot matter and antimatter after a very long time. So the temperature of two distant collisions could become similar without coming from the same source. The Cosmic Background Radiation is many light years big. And it showed a slow expansion rate, slower than the current expansion rate. I can say for sure that the universe didn't expand from a curved point/singularity. And the universe expanded from point to point, and that is why the universe is flat. But pseudoscience of creationists made scientists make a curved singularity. So it is clear that western creationists are more powerful than atheist/agnostic scientists. And they, created the energy called Dark Energy to make a scientific story to make space from nothing even after the Big Bang. Likely, there are universes as separated regions where gravity and an expansion of matter play the role. But most scientists don't talk about that possibility because of the current expansion rate of the universe and the influence of creationists. There are a lot of things to learn about the universe from hidden dimensions. Likely, the neutrino oscillation is responsible for quantum gravity. So the General Relativity wouldn't work well inside Black Holes and Singularity. The wave function indicates the existence of many worlds in hidden dimensions.
I have multiple sclerosis I use videos like this to distract myself from the physical pain and suffering Sorry if this sounds dramatic but I'm grateful for your work
As a creative writer interested in poetry and creative non-fiction, the writing in these videos makes me drool. It is imaginative, innovative, and incredibly informative, making intriguing connections between vastly different scientific, historical, and science fiction topics. The writing accomplishes this while also managing to build an immersive story line that allows the viewer to relate, all while presenting complex scientific facts in an easily accessible and understandable fashion. These are my comfort videos, for times when I want to get lost in expansive language that teaches me more about my place in the universe as I fall asleep or go about daily tasks. Thank you for the amazing content!
@@f.u.c8308 yeah. Modulus was new to me. I liked the video because it was accurate about Kaluza's ideas and what was meant by "extra dimensions". However string theory has become a gravy train for self-promoting mathematical nonces.
@@odros That’s Scientific Theory , it’s not fact but assumption based on Fundamentals. It’s an exploration of curiosity, if the video makes you ask questions. Then it did a fantastic Job. It sounds like you learned about the right questions to ask based on your comment so you learned something :)
Wow, I got about to halfway and then could not understand much till the very end. 😂 I was waiting and waiting that maybe it will click in my brain finally, but... nope. What was left was a fantastic, yet mysterious mixture of scientific pictunary. I'm working on a sci fi fantacy book. This is kind of quite inspiring for artistic purposes, yet would be nice to actually understand. 😂😁🤣
The nuclear bomb could of been developed thousands of years ago imagine that we could of entered space centuries ago think of that think of all the things we could of done if our greatest scholars weren’t massacred and their information constantly destroyed how many times have we been sent back
@@douglassopperman1201 but had the nuclear bomb been invented thousands of years ago we would have wiped ourselves out. Pretty sure the earth would still be recovering now? I'm no expert so my thoughts may very well be completely wrong but I'm just thinking how brutal war is and if ancients had nuclear weapons then the entire global population would have been wiped out, it was certainly small enough to have been.
2000 years isn't that long ago, if you really think about it. I wouldn't be surprised that some hunter gatherer conceived of this idea 100,000 years ago but wasn't able to record his epiphany with writings. We're not that much smarter than we were back then... if anything, we're probably now dumber than those cave dwellers (thanks, iPhone and social media)😆. We're here at this level of knowledge due to some of those geniuses throughout our short written human history who discovered the breakthroughs and were able to share their findings through written records.
I realize that there is only so much “history of the universe” that can be covered, but please don’t ever stop making these videos! This and history of the earth are two of the absolute best channels on RUclips!
This documentary is ridiculous not merely on its very shoddy history of physics but right from the beginning on its confusion. The guy mixes up dimension and direction at random, and throws his historical people around without care and without any interesting detail. It's just a mish-mash of junk thrown in a box as he wanders around. There is nothing, nothing at all, "high quality" about it. Perhaps you're being taken in by the narrator's portentous tone of voice?
@Musbiq We could get into a prolonged discussion about a sheer number of coincidences and impossibilities which led to the balance of our universe, or about Annunaki (if you haven't yet, read the book of Enoch) but I will only say this:I come from an atheist family, but all of my research into these subjects led me to firmly believe in God.And love Him.
@@guapnarothereaper3161 I mean the one true God, Creator of Heaven and the Earth.If it's easier for you to call Him Abrahamic God, than have it your way.
Currently going through a separation. I won't go into details because they are irrelevant. My wife is the only person I enjoyed discussing things like this with; I see the universe(s) in her eyes, and she always brought up stuff my daft self would miss. I miss her. I miss those talks. I miss being shown I don't know everything. I know a comment like this is annoying to a lot of you - probably would be to me as well - but I'm still going to say it. Have someone you love... don't just say it to them, show them. Love you, M.
At first you see the sun & assume there is nothing like it, then you get out there & learn there are many suns...some even more spectacular than your own. Just as there are many suns, there are many Morgan's out there. At first it seems like nothing can compare to Morgan, until get out there & see the rest of the stars 🌟 Time heals all wounds.
Let me guess, she's just not 'happy'. A woman's prerogative I guess... It's just that I have never heard man use that as an excuse to end a marriage. Good luck sir.
@@craigwillms61who hurt you💀. If an intelligent woman who talks about the wonders of the universe leaves a man, then surely she would have a good reason for it?
I would've given my left nut to have had such a wealth of good documentaries like this when I was a kid in the mid 2000s. Animal Planet, Natgeo, History Channel, etc only had so much and we all know what they turned into. The move from TV studios to individuals and small groups of independent creators was inevitable. A textbook lesson in market competition. It's just unfortunate that all these creators are stuck under a corporation like Google.
They aren't stuck under Google. They are creators and can create anywhere!!! Btw, can you elaborate your concern and provide a suggestion/solution that and computer Science students group can implement? 😶🌫️😂
those channels had valuable info if you are discerning enough..pbs also had good things... things change and you look for the best in every environment... that's the whole purpose of learning... to enhance. Sour, sweet, bitter, pungent... all must be tasted.
Was born in 1970 am 52 and what taught me about parallel universes and antimatter was star trek but I wish I had u tube back then I just imagined the knowledge I who have gained
Unique observation of 90’s baby’s lol. I relate, I would have at this up as a kid but was limited to the same channels. Sure, it’s great in adulthood but the mind doesn’t imagine and dream like when you’re a kid.
This is why I watch much more YT than cable, not to mention that the cable shows you mentioned have gotten a lot more trashier than they were back then. TLC used to be "the learning channel!" I'm not old, but old enough to appreciate the existence of the internet and the wealth of knowledge in it.
These videos along with 'The History of the Earth' collection are quite simply the best of anything you can watch on any platform. The poetry with which these are narrated makes my spine tingle!
It is very difficult to conceive of, mentally, so the best way I’m able to envision the extra dimensions in our reality is to acknowledge the fact that they really aren’t _anywhere_ because they are _everywhere._ We are constantly moving in, out, through, above and below them in every instance of our existence, and quite likely in every instance _afterwards._
I like the ant and wire analogy. From a long ways off a telephone wire hanging overhead looks 1D, there is only left and right, and indeed, for us large humans we can only ever move along the wire constrained to motion to that 1D motion. Now, take a smaller animal, like an Ant, that ant walking along the telephone sees it curl around on each side and he can quite easily walk all the way around it, fully aware that he has two dimensions to work with. The folded up dimensions of string theory are similar, wrapped up so small we could never hope to interact with them. Atoms are even much too large to interact with the waves, larger than the waves than humans are larger than those atoms. EDIT: 26:45, I see an ant walking on a line. Lol.
For Software Engineers this becomes quite easy to imagine as we work with multi-dimensional arrays. While they are not physical, we can wrap our heads around the many axis of freedom associated with both systems.
@@emsa5034 Yes. Although physics tells us that past, present and future all exist at the same point, we render time to instantiate our consciousness between events, like between heartbeats, but we still exist in all dimensions of space at the same instant. As we move through space, we actually render time--we create a past, present and future in each dimension. So, when we think there is a dimension that 'contains our past', we are only partly correct. There is, but it's also the same dimension we are in currently.
i like to think about dimension this way; a man walk on the top of a skyscraper. He can freely move in 2 dimension; the distance (Z) and on each side (X) dimension. When he reach the end of the surface, he fall down. He no longer move in the X and Z dimension at all, but he totally knows he is moving faster and faster into the (Y) dimension, and he knows all the moduli in the world, will not save him when he reach the previous dimension of X and Z, and splatter as a mere sheet of atoms... :) i need a coffee...
You genuinely make some of the most informative and entertaining scientific content. Your storytelling style is captivating when covering topics that are seen as overwhelming and boring. Appreciate you!
The most comprehensive, insightful, thorough, intricate, beautiful display of how we decipher the abstract. Astonishing display, everyone needs to see.
Excellent - even though I can't say I understand, what was said here well enough to describe it to someone else, I am a lot closer to a weak grasp of string theory than ever before. Thanks. I will be revisiting this episode several times I'm sure. Well done folks. Also, the nearration by David Kelly is among the best of all voices on the internet. Clear, with proper inflection and dynamics along with living in the right frequencies. In other words, easy on the ears.
Great video, have always known there’s more to life than meets the eye, I feel like in this life i am supposed to be doing more than i am doing for the people i love. been seeking for an eye opening enlightenment, a way to be more influential, powerful and protected~
oh well you can achieve that by being a part of the illuminatus brotherhood, i know it sounds like a mystery but there are ways you can actually get in contact with them
@@haynesatteh4463 Well it is not and you can't actually expect it to be open to everyone, but if you want to know more you can look up ANTHONY MARK SZYMON online you will find something interesting.
Direct care services, volunteer work. Seriously. Whatever humanitarian issue that you feel a draw to, you should seek out. Whether it's un-house people's services, working with kids, elderly care, environmental services. Any non-profit that you feel drawn to, volunteer with them. You will find your path.
i’ve been devouring physics explainers for the last few years, trying to extend my knowledge of sound physics into the realm of light.. not to mention readings on abstract geometry and the “holographic” appearance of different phenomena in the universe.. anyway i gotta say, THIS video really blows the roof off! it really feels like it’s all coming together in an intuitive way, and i’m glad i can continue to learn about these topics in my post-college life. thank you!
MAYBE THIS LITTLE BIT WILL OPEN NEW DOORS IN YOUR QUANTUM COMPUTING BRAIN.."WE ARE ALL BI POLAR SEMICONDUCTORS OF INFORMATION SYNCHED TOGETHER AND WHEN ONE OF US LEARNS SOMETHING NEW IT IS INFORMATION NOW ACCESSIBLE TO ALL OF US FOR THE PURPOSE OF EVOLUTION
There's a lot of clever people doing this kind of thing on youtube, and god knows I've watched them all, but this is the first time I've watched a youtube doc and completely forgotten I'm not watching on BBC1 prime time - seriously, production value, clarity, narrative, your voice, all fantastic. I'm sure you are going to do very very well for yourself. And now, I am going to watch every single video you've ever made !!
Visualizing multiple dimensions is like imagining a surgeon who can put on a VR headset and then flip through the layers of reality like a catalog to perform surgery on a person by virtually reaching into something that looks like a tree and pulling out an unwanted branch except that the tree is the person and they can't feel anything and never have to be drugged or sliced open, they can just go home healed and feeling completely normal
Where are all these dimensions, all around you and passing through you. We create our own reality and the more open minded we are the more we unlock the truth within us. Speaking from personal experience and absolutely not from books or the programming I received as a child from parents, school, authority, religions and society in general, I’ve started to experience other dimensions, realised that time is not linear and space/distance is an illusion in this multidimensional multiverse and that’s just for starters. An open mind unlocks all doors as it realises that we created the doors blocking our consciousness, we are the key. 🌟
The way the universe works is truly mind blowing and you explain it so well. I've watched other videos on this and you are the only that told it to where normal people can understand.
I cant express how glad i am that this channel exist! thanks for all your work! im getting youtube red to then rebinch all your vidoes as soon as i can to support you as much as i can
24:32 Even if we cannot see individual atoms, we can still feel their effects. 24:38 Every time we touch anything with our hands, or sit down on a chair, we feel the effects of 24:44 atoms. The fact that, when we sit down, we do not carry on plunging through the seat of the chair 24:49 is because of the summed effect of billions upon billions upon billions of atoms, and the electric 24:55 interactions between them. When we sit down, the entire earth is pulling on us downwards, using the force of gravity. What resists this pull is an electric repulsion that occurs as the matter 25:06 that is us tries to pass through the matter that is the chair - and this repulsion originates from 25:12 the atoms making up both, even though we cannot directly discern individual atoms. 25:21 So for atoms, we can feel their effects, even if we cannot directly resolve them.
Just curious, what is the point of all the extra time stamps. You could have just written: 24:32 Even if we cannot see individual atoms, we can still feel their effects. Every time we touch anything with our hands or sit down on a chair, we feel the effects of atoms. The fact that, when we sit down, we do not carry on plunging through the seat of the chair is because of the summed effect of billions upon billions upon billions of atoms, and the electric interactions between them. When we sit down, the entire earth is pulling on us downwards, using the force of gravity. What resists this pull is an electric repulsion that occurs as the matter that is us tries to pass through the matter that is the chair - and this repulsion originates from the atoms making up both, even though we cannot directly discern individual atoms. So for atoms, we can feel their effects, even if we cannot directly resolve them.
You have a gift of being able to explain very technical and complicated ideas in a simple manner that the average person can process, which is what documentaries should do. You got my sub and I really look forward to learning more about our universe in future videos 🙂
( referring to the VIDEO )You keep saying the word decay, The word decay simply means breakdown, when a particle is breaking down wouldn’t it break down into a smaller particle ie subatomic particle and then a subatomic particle would decay into an ultra subatomic particle and so on and so forth which also dives right into the casual-forces ( the forces that make up causality ), Forces by which that dictate gravity, which by the way is not a weak force as you falsely claim it to be?? With all this being said, the limitation would soon meet a climax being something of a fine immaterial sphere giving power for space-time to relatively grow as an eternity, maybe people need to start researching Einstein a little bit more because I don’t think y’all understand dimensions at all despite the fact that this video is well produced, you lack the understanding of an infinite relative amount of particles that exist within itself breaking down into higher states of energy which deals with a relative order and principal point ( singularity) of what is called “creation”, still it shows how primitive human beings are and still have a long way to go. To break out of this EGOTISTICAL MATERIALISTIC BUBBLE.
What you just said is exactly what I have been saying about professor Brian Greene for years. Now there is another helpful voice out there. I agree with you about David Kelly.
The first thing that occured to me, was that we keep trying to look smaller when searching for extra dimensions. I am curious as to wether it has been considered for there to be larger dimensions that we are too small to observe.
makes perfect sense to me, dimensions would not be restricted by size, I mean there is no reason that we and all we know by the way of the universe could be just an atom in another dimension
@@TheNomad2727 Therein lies the caveat "All we know". What we "know" and understand changes, it could be that the maths for it has yet to be created. It seems rather ignorant to dismiss the possibility of something beyond our current understanding.
That's part of the problem with looking at them. Our POV is so different that what looks micro to us may actually be just an artefact or a lensing echo of something very much macro and that's why we can't detect it clearly. We're trying to look too small and as we narrow the focus, the overall picture loses clarity.
disclaimer: I know very little about any of this, but watched this documentary with intense interest and took many notes. The thought occurred to me that concepts of "micro" and "macro" seem like they might be limited to a 3 dimensional perception of space. The idea that something small could contain something larger than itself seems impossible for us to conceive, but then again, so does a fourth dimension.
Also, I'd always had a vague idea that the reason we can't perceive extra dimensions is because we are "inside" of them. Like the way you can't see the outside of a box if you're inside the box. But like I said, I know very little about these theories, I'm just a humble 3D modeller/artist :P
This is probably the best understandable description of string theory's basic premises that I've yet heard. Thank you for another brilliant video. Stay well out there everybody, and God bless you, friends. ✝️ :)
I appreciate how you manage to find material that isn’t in the regular pop science documentary curriculum. I’ve watched god knows how many films about string theory - I’ve even struggled through Lenny Susskind’s Stanford String Theory lecture series (not exactly pop science) - and of course I knew about the extra compactified dimensions, but I don’t remember ever hearing about modulus particles before.
00trh007@gm im on brink of rainbow atom and silver aura infinity electron clouds clouds colors resurrect dead black holes mirror as long as i believe my imagination … i need ideas other than angles in Love become 360in light and life something with tau 7T pi ee=mc^2 and still hold 40 42 degree arcs
This makes 2 of us. Could there be more? I failed to properly integrate what string theory really meant until I saw this video. And I have now a much clearer picture of its origin, significance and position in science, with visuals to figure it mentally. Modulus particles are the golden cherry on top of an already very generous science video. I'd like to know more, about the authors of this video, and about the universe that permitted their appearance. Both are amazing.
@@Zookeeper. if you want to really grasp String theory, go to the source. Susskind’s Stanford entire lecture courses are available right here on RUclips. He will not only teach you the math but even show you how to derive it yourself - and you don’t need up be a genius to follow what he’s saying. It’s fascinating.
@@X-boomer Wow... Thanks a million for the tip, this is a goldmine from the look of it. I am only a few minutes in and already drawn by Leonard Susskind's deep intelligence and simple ways. I had the chance to meet physicists from CNRS and CERN (and with a few to drink and be silly) and I am starting to see a pattern: deep knowledge about reality apparently comes with humility, humor and humanity. Susskind fits right in, and I'll be busy trying to let a bit of his brillance lighting up my brain, despite the obvious impedance mismatch 😅 Thanks again, Ralph 👍
@@Zookeeper. you’re welcome. You may have notice his introductory lectures on quantum theory are there as well. They are quite fascinating in the way that they too show how the math is derived.
Beautifully made. Thoroughly absorbing. The concepts were so well presented that for a sublime moment I thought I understood! A thought occurred to me: could moduli or axions be the stuff of dark matter?
Subbed! This was so well put together. It literally goes toe-to-toe with much of the science Channel or Nova episodes on the topic but im sure with a fraction or really much of a budget that they had, which makes it so impressive and more respectable from a place of passion. These mini documentaries paved the way for a way of thinking outside the box that i carried with me and shaped me as an adult. So much respect!
A nice thing to think about if you want to freak yourself out: If there is another spatial dimension we simply cannot perceive, it's quite possible that there are creatures watching us, at all times, creatures that are, for lack of a better term, "right beside us", separated only by the invisible dimension. There wouldn't be much we could do to keep them away. One funny theory (not in the scientific sense) is that superdimensional creatures occasionally coming to our slice of 4d space and then leaving again - which to us would seem like they appear from and then disappear into thin air - is what cryptids and UFOs really are. How can the Loch Ness monster hide from us even though we searched that lake with all sorts of tech? It just "sidesteps" us. Same with bigfoot. And UFOs can disappear so quickly because they can move in all 4 dimensions.
Except these dimensions are at the scale of the smallest particles we know about. Which means only something that small could travel them. Kinda prohibits sentient life. Any existing dimensions larger and we would be able to either see their effects. Other dimensions the way Hollywood proposes them are not what string theory is suggesting.
Yeah, you need to see the movie interstellar. One character is flipped through a higher dimension so any option he sees translates to motion back and forth in time. But because he's been flipped he can't move in space, only time. And had odd interactions with the real world. A ghost in other worlds. But it would require enormous energy to do something like this.
My favorite quote from the Aristotle, his friend brought him to the markets and he said, look at the myriad of things for sale, and he said, " there are so many things I don't want ". 🙏
@2:59 Realities are like radio stations. Cymatics is another good illustration of how realities ( dimensions ) can coexist within one another. Pour water into sand, it remains in the sand, because it's "particle size" is smaller than the sand. Same goes for higher dimensions. It can coexist with matter, because its "particle size" is smaller than that of matter (sub-quantum)
More like thiiiiiiisssss!!! Finally something I can watch/ listen to and get a little history, physics, math, and science all together!!! Thank you for your support and knowledge 🌈🫒
Thanks for releasing this. I was counting down the days to yesterday but then had to wait one more. Certainly worth the wait. Plus, as a person who list their hearing due to an accidental exposure to an explosion, I would like to thank you for including proper Closed Captions.
Some wild "trip" I had once was the experience of a visceral sensation that "information packets" held all forms of the "constant Mind" of the universe - accessed via mental frequencies (like unique key IDs that connect you to a data point) that can be read and downloaded. It would apply to anything - any kind of information you would want to "simulate" would be there - even down to the nuances of everyday chainlink sensations you wouldn't think remarkable - is encoded in some frequency/vibrational fields.
This is called connecting to God via Spirit. Go learn of love, duality, function, dysfunction, good and evil, and God's order and God as He's shown you a sign. The Hidden God exists.
I wonder if you're speaking of what I call- for dire need of a much better term - inspiration. I'm very simple. I was thinking about best selling authors once, and Stephen King in particular. And wondering at his extraordinary range of ideas. He has written imho, some great reading books appealing to a great swathe of the population, about horror and creatures, and other books like Rita Haywood and Shawshank Redemption, and The Green Mile. His characters can be occasionally rich, complex and accessible/relatable, if you're simple like me. Then there is Harper Lee's To Kill A Mockingbird. It seems to me that ideas swirl around the ether waiting for a chosen mind to drop into. And sometimes that ends up being a person's only great contribution. A single best-seller, or beautiful song etc. While others, like Stephen King's body of work becomes endless. I just wonder if there's a connection formed by physics there.
Just a minute of the video passed, but I've yet to see anyone who would draw me into the video just like you. The intertwined history and physics, the topic and music pick, the overall elaboration and narrating - all of my choice. Your work is much appreciated.
We need to make a conference so we all can get together. People who understand these videos need together and talk. Absolutely brain shattering. Thank you very much. Writing. Voice acting. Production. Soundtrack. Truly the best doing their best.
This was so complex yet so clearly explained i feel wasted in the best way possible after watching it. Like accomplishing the marathon you always dream of running through and having the satisfaction of completing it even with all the exhaustion.
Fun fact, I got lost in the maths and started to ignore the physics. Let's just say I switched majors fast lol. I went to software development. I love math, I love physics, but having to know...that was taking a toll on me. I had to know how deep the materials went. Software engineering is simple, (ironically, I think this is what physics was about) learn patterns and structures, use a software language and build things with those patterns and structures. Some of which others have already tested and used. Rinse Repeat. The thing is, I realize now, that what I was doing in physics was equivalent to trying to understand how the IDE worked, how the language was turned into computer language, etc. Stuff that would help me later, but at the time would only bog me down. The bain power for me to do software isn't much since everybody is using a certain development cycle. All I have to do is simply learn it and do my work adhering to the rules. Then I can go home and play around with math. Using computers to visualize or test the math I am learning is great. I remember solving a coding problem with a math concept. Unfortunately, nobody wants people to do that in software engineering. Easily understandable code is valued higher than some math concept only few have seen.
Special Relativity and SuperSymmetry are the equals sign in Quantum Mechanical Equations. They are the invisible rules that govern the "Balanced Equation" or "Symmetry". If you stand on the equals sign and ask "Why?" in those equations, you have to stop calling space "zero" and non contributing and allow for the tensor fields to "connect" two particles. We currently call this "Connection Tensor": "Skin Theory", "The Higgs Mechanism/Field/Particle", "WIMP", String Theory or even General Relativity itself and it endeavours to describe Gravity, Magnetism, Radio Frequency, any special relativity "spooky action at a distance" observation, at a much more fundamental level. They are all compressed space reactions to Temperature or Velocity or Mass and the reaction projects back into our space from higher dimensions of space. Their theoretical existence is proven by the observational data. Great Vid, Thanks B-) PS: No one ever talks about the relative time-dilation of the Big Bang, sure it exploded and inflated, but in our zero degree space observational window that would take (Temperature/5)^2 seconds observed for every second of the big bang, and velocities are redshifted down there so, if say our Universe is 100 million light years "thick" you need to multiply that by the Big Bang time dilation to know how long our Universe actually took to form the potential for matter through that entire 100 million light years. The Big Bang is still there burning away at the center of all the atomic particles and all EM particles in our Universe. 13.85 Billion years is tiny little fraction of one second for the Big Bang. The highest "visible" Big Bang temperature is 10^144 degrees celsius (Theoretically derived by inverse squaring any temperature back to a 6 Planck radius giving us the proton temperature of ~10^36).
there is no proof that supersymmetry is real. In fact the lack of evidence so far of supersymmetrical twin particles is a good sign that it is not real
@@KateeAngel Be careful to not cross over Neutrino versus Interference creation events. Supersymmetry is the equals sign in any algebra, kinetics, magnetism, gravity itself are all part of the "symmetry" equations. Their is no evidence for Neutrino paired particles persisting after the Big Bang, but there is for lowering temperature interference / redshift which is another form of "supersymmetry". If paired particles did occur they most likely annihilated long ago.
What resists this pull is an electric repulsion that occurs as the matter 25:06 that is us tries to pass through the matter that is the chair - and this repulsion originates from 25:12 the atoms making up both, even though we cannot directly discern individual atoms. 25:21 So for atoms, we can feel their effects, even if we cannot directly resolve them.
hey... I live in Spain too. Love ya videos. and btw after loosing my 2 sons, your videos are a great distraction and a wonderfully magical way to get a new perspective. Thanks, and keep going!
The implications of this are so fascinating to ponder. It could turn out that the phenomenon of ghosts is real, just completely different than what we had always assigned to it. Maybe they are a sort of shadow, or vibration from dimensions we can't directly perceive but somehow affects ours
Amazing video! Personally, the easiest way for me to even try comprehending extra dimensions is to think about how a 2d person on a screen would try to perceive, or even understand 3d. A 3d sphere passing through a 2d plane (like a piece of paper) would simply look like a tiny circle growing bigger, then shrinking back into nothing--at least, to the inhabitants of that 2d world. A lot of these theoretical physics are still born in, and can only explain what they see through our own limited lense. But I personally find that comforting, knowing that we're only seeing an infinitesimally small part of the universe. Makes be believe existence is far more than the life we're perceiving now.
Same! Science has lead me to God! He’s got to be the ultimate science nerd! I’m so grateful and I have never felt like my existence mattered all that much until I started learning about this!
Music is key. For me... The way piano keys are seperated can be applied to help getting my head around dimensions. It all fits and feels right according to my inner bullshit detector.
@@supermeansadie6753 That's kind of rude to divert compliments away from the people who worked really hard to figure any of this out, but I'm glad you found joy in something.
@@AlbertNovakLoveTechnician yes but for us the 4th dimension is on rails we can only march forward in time and the infinite possibility of each particals motions are observed as our dimensions singular trajectory. With those graphics I had a sense of how on a subatomic level the course of alternative dimensions might splinter off.
This is mych better content than anything the "history channel" ever put out. Calm, relaxing and interesting. No hype or excitement and no re hashing every 5 min.
One more time .All the hidden dimensions are right before your eyes ,and in order to see them , you must look with the all -- seeing 3rd eye . Then they will loom large in front of you, not all together ,one at a time. And you can bounce from one to the other ,each one an independent domain in itself as this world is a complete independent domain in itself .
Amazing video, and I loved the ending when it said maybe we'll have a microscope small enough to see them. We are so small in the midst of it all, and still HUGE and impactful in the space(s) we occupy. I like to think our universe is a red blood cell of a giant somewhere, and we're like the energy producing agent to the mix, but sadly we only produce harmful energy due to what we're doing to our home
I think quantum computers will help us a lot, with their use we can recreate quantum behavior, having very precise answers, just gotta dress it up in mathematics, that might not yet exist On top of that quantum computers will cause revolution in materials, true quantum simulation makes possible to create new alloys or methods of manufacturing, imagine self assembling carbon nanofiber tubes grown using yeast
@@PazLeBon not really, with quantum computers you can simulate particles and alloys behavior directly, it's not computation per se, just programming structure and seeing behavior of it, quantum particles giving precision answer like testing on real object Imagine making new steel, you have 30 variables and goal is to make light alloy resisting liquid hydrogen under pressure, that is superior than existing alloys, sometimes adding 0.01% of element to alloy can change it's properties drastically
@@taith2 ok maths is the wrong word put like that, but perhaps number of calculations/possibile outcomes is somewhat related. Its essentially a speeding up process :)
02:41, I had a shock of incongruence. I thought up and down were on the same axis. And the three dimensions were up, forward and across. Anyway, the collection of videos is outstanding, well explained and really interesting. Thank you!
Isn't it worthwhile to point out that most superstring theorists believed that superstring particles would be at the LHC in coordinates with their theories, whereas in fact, no superstream particles have yet been detected. Although the negative results don't disprove string theory they certainly cast aspersion on its correctness especially in the absence of any other confirmatory evidence in the past 40 years or so
You cannot probe string theor at the LHC. What they hoped for was that we have low-energy supersymmetry in our universe. Turns out it is at energies unreachable for the LHC atm
It was supersymetry, not string theory that was being looked for. No evidence has been found. While some physicists have suggested it must be at higher energies, there is a slowly growing body of physicists that have said that yeah maybe this whole supersymetry things a bust. However without Supersymetry, theres no string theory (or a bunch of other exotic physics ideas for that matter). So while the LHC cant *prove* it, it can contribute towards a disproof ("It must be at a higher energy" goalpost shifting notwithstanding)
@@shayneoneill1506thank you for properly explaining that to him. I was going to say, no chance that they were looking for string theory evidence at the LHC, everything I read indicates that we’d need an obscene amount of energy to do that, and our current tech doesn’t come close.
Escheresque distillation of so much information in such a short time without feeling like you’re being waterboarded. I enjoyed this so much and I believe even experts in these fields would not walk away without learning something new or making a connection about how things are interrelated.
10:03 I’m 50 and when I was like 5 I observed my mothers finish in her aquarium and always wondered could the fish see air like I see the water they are moving thru as I grew older I pondered in could they see the water? I now know the answer. Another thing I’ve noticed is when it’s windy and the shadows made by trees from light tend to move and are to me almost alive whereas I’m positive I’ve seen things that I can’t explain. Now that I’ve brought it to everyone’s attention please try and take notice the next time your around a tree on a windy day.
I'd be fascinated just to listen to you talk about other theoretical physics, like the work on E8 or Geometric Unity. Most people think it's a crock, or don't give it any mind, but given that the only thing needed for GU's completion is some of the existing LHC data to be released and analyzed (to verify the theory's results), it makes me wonder why they don't allow that to be examined. Either way, I've watched (so far) this video and one previous, and both are fantastic. I'm probably going to rabbit-hole down the rest of your content for the rest of this weekend! Fantastic stuff!
@@BinkyTheToaster I have pinned a comment containing some useful links which you may find to be of interest under my video entitled: _Geometric Unity explained in under 2 minutes_ Unfortunately as is often the case this channel does not allow me to link anything here under this video.
I still appreciate the analogy of using a 2D being trying to understand the appearance of a sphere passing through its universe-first a dot, then a growing circle, shrinking circle and finally a dot again before it disappears. I’ve wondered for a long time if electron tunneling is explained by an electron traveling through a tiny fifth dimension we cannot detect, but that doesn’t seem to be a popular hypothesis. Or is it? 🤷♂️
There was a paper a few years back, where, instead of just modeling the electron at a tunnel barrier as a spatially smeared probability amplitude of itself (standard QM), someone modeled it as a localized classical particle surrounded by a sea of other localized electrons that it was only very weakly able to interact with via repulsion. Apparently the pre-quantum thermodynamic equations of Statistical Thermodynamics was enough to duplicate the "borrowed" tunneling energy and probability. I think this concept of many weakly repelling classical worlds (MIW) has since been numerically simulated to show other quantum effects such as ground states and twin slit interference. In the limit of 1 classical world it behaves Newtonian. In the opposite limit of infinite interacting 'worlds' the authors argue that it would be indistinguishable from one `world` following standard Schrodinger probability wave equations.
Perhaps not SMALL dimensions but large dimensions with constrained mobility. The plank volume only able to propagate its state in specific dimensions. On the surface of a black hole gravity constrains propagation again to TWO dimensions.
16:30 I found out how to make these intuitively, for a few years now, and by chance, I stumble across this video. Thing is, I've come to a conclusion that, those "versions" are a manifestation of one thing, and I know how that looks like, if you're seeing it in 3D. As in, the visual formula, to which you can derive the method from. I don't know who I can reach out to share this with, so if anyone can help, it would be really appreciated.
well are you expecting to vaguely describe this thing already mathematically known and have someone derive equations from your descriptions ala Faraday? Seems iffy. Just go to stack exchange, physics. subheading manifold topology
@@anonemouse1470 any good equation needs something visual, in order to be properly understood. While this can be looked at, it's functionally useless, like most equations out there. What I want to do, is turn that, into something everyone can use. You don't have to know how to make a phone, in order to use it. And so far, I've showed this to some people, and they always went "yo it always works, but how?" , And I show them the shape, and it's much clearer
multidimensional shapes become much clearer? I'm all for it but have you ever seen a hypercube? you're talking about nth dimensional manifolds im not sure how you extrapolate the "shape" without math
Just noticed this and started listening to it. Does look promising and I'll listen to the end. But surely there's a mistake early on, one which might be addressed later, hopefully. We're told that Kaluza explained our lack of ability to detect the fourth spatial dimension. But neither he nor Einstein had answers when critics asked them where this fourth spatial dimension is. It was Kline who deserves credit for the compactification idea, not Kaluza. If it wasn't for this contribution the theory wouldn't be called Kaluza Klein theory. That was his contribution and it does deserve to be acknowledged, especially given its rediscovery being central to the formation of string theory.
what's also funny is that it was Gunnar Nordstrom who initally had the idea of unifying electromagnetism with general relativity by going to 5 dimensions! Typical situation in math & physics, where the first guy who discovered something doesn't get any credit ^^
this may be a stupid question, but rather than extra dimensions being so small we can’t observe them, what if the extra dimensions are so big that we can’t comprehend them in the first place? loved the video btw!!
Damn. As nothing more than a non-physicist, casually interested spectator, I spent years trying to wrap my head around string theory, and more specifically, how the hypothesis could be proved or disproved. I should have just saved the effort and watched this video.
Thought experiment: You take a sheet of paper and you have 2 dimensions. When you look at the curves of the smaller dimensions, what you're looking at is that same piece of paper in another dimension, but in a slightly different orientation. I hypothesize that these smaller dimensions are an overlay of other universes overlapping with the one we experience. This would also resolve the problem of virtual particles by seeing these "wound dimensions" as a sort of mobius strip
And I have always wondered if the movement of the paper (any object) from one point to another is the Fourth Dimension. I am not trying to correct anyone, I am trying to ask a question.
@@beauxr.benoit1374 People seem to struggle visualizing the 4th dimension but I believe it's extremely easy. When a photographer takes a time-lapse photo of the stars or a flower, what are they doing? They are taking momentary snapshots of what state the 3rd dimension is in. Einstein calls it spacetime and I think it's more than just a hyphenate. Each dimension is nothing more than a collection of variations of the dimension below. It has nothing to do with "ways to have a 90 degree angle". A line is a collection of dots. A plane is a collection of lines, a block is a collection of planes, motion is a collection of blocks, parallel realities is a collection of motions. When I say parallel realities, what do I mean? I mean either "my time, your time, Billy's time" or I mean "multiverse theory". They mean the same thing. So, we can go further and further. But what about the other direction. If a square is 2D, and a line is 1D and a dot is 0D, what is below that? Math itself. Not the expression of math, but math itself. -1D, below that I believe we would get into the nature of our substrate. Maybe it's the logic gate transistors on the computer that runs our simulation. Looking at it this way, as -2D being the transistors of our computer, we could then extrapolate back up and better define -1D. Instead of saying "math itself" which is confusing, we could say "the programming. the firmware". Remember the definition? The states of something? Firmware is a state of a transistor. When you look at dimensions like that, everything kinda just makes sense. There's 2 ways of looking at the winding dimension described in this video. It could be the cross section of multiple dimensions (aka timelines, character trees like in a video game where you have story line trees)...but it could also be the physical expression of the 4th dimension. I personally subscribe to the first one because time could instead be the dark energy that pushes the cosmos apart. you know? like when a subatomic particle "chooses" to do something
@@Rising_Pho3nix_23 I think that definition is not great. Shapes in a dimension might be just collections of shapes from the lower dimension, but, importantly, the shapes must stacked orthogonally to all of the lower dimensions it exists in. A collection of shapes on its own is not enough. Furthermore, there is nothing lower than the 0th dimension. And if it did exist in some way, to say it's our three dimensional computer chips is nonsensical, let alone the concept of math.
@@polecat3 Who says they have to be orthogonally? Einstein disagrees with you and ALL of physics disagree with you. 4th dimension called Time is not at a right angle. What you are trying to do is force every dimension to fit into the 3rd dimension. That doesn't make sense. I can go into great detail about how I use the term dimension to simply mean "collection of possibilities of the dimension below it" and my definition would be supported by all known physics. At least in terms of dimensions 1-4. And you know what they say about patterns.....
Wow. I hope you are getting payed for the time you and your group put into making these videos. Is there some kind of award that we could nominate you for?
I know it’s heretical but you have to remember that the dimensions are concepts that we made up to try to fit a framework around our observations. A photon does not care in which ‘direction’ that it goes, it just goes.
@@PazLeBon The big bang as in the observable universe from very soon after the beginning and along the expansion until now is hard to show properly in 3d. The observable universe started as a tiny sphere that grew into the enormous sphere it is today. It is billions of lightyears across. And the observable universe is not the entirety of the universe nor are the physics in the conditions very early in the universes existence well understod. A tiny sphere that grows into a large sphere over time is a 4 dimensional object the same kind of object as a tesseract. It is impossible to properly replicate a 4d object in our 3d world without using time as a 4:th dimension. You could do a time lapse with a small globe turning into a large globe to illustraite the change but you can't put a timelapse or video in a book so they do a work around. They take a thin center slice of the globe of the observable universe for all different ages of the universe and stack them. A slice of a globe is a circle and a stack of circles sorted according to their age and therefor size becomes a cone. You could also look at it this way: The cone shows the observable universes breadth, thickness and age and doesn't show it's height. The directions are: X, Y, T. X and Y are spatial dimensions and T is the time dimensions. Hopefully this helps.
@@simonwahlen7150 i think its wierd they dont have a better representation, not I didnt understand but eloquently put nevertheless :) Id prefer the globe representation because it just 'feels' 'less' dimensional when expressed as a slice :)
@@simonwahlen7150 so you think the universe is a sphere? Yet infinite? Can spheres be infinite and how? Or do you think there’s an edge to the universe? I’m just highly curious about this lol
@@emsa5034 Due to the speed of light and relativity when we look at something farther away we also look at it earlier in time. The edge of the observable universe 14~ish billion light years away is also 14 billions of years earlier in time than we are. The edge of the universe is so "young" that is still so hot that it is a wall of plasma our telescopes can't se through. Since all points on a spheres surface are equaly far from the middle everything that is 14 billions of light years away from us forms a sphere that is 14 billion light yeras in diameter. I don't know if the entirety of the universe is finite or not I haven't seen theories about that. I think the leading theories about our 3-dimensions not curving into each other and the universe having zero energy when negativ energy from gravity cancels out other energy allows for an infinite universe but I am not sure.
This was such a beautiful video on multiple levels. I added it to the playlists I felt they could be perceived in the most meaningful ways. Thank you for Sharing this Wisdom!
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
Start speaking a new language in 3 weeks with Babbel 🎉. Get up to 65% OFF your subscription ➡️ HERE: go.babbel.com/t?bsc=1200m65-youtube-historyoftheuniverse-july-2022&btp=default&RUclips&Influencer..History%20of%20the%20Universe..USA..RUclips
quick question.. Aren't axions a potential candidate for dark matter also? Does this make their detection a possible solution to two problems?
Two energies that arrive from two sides of the universe can make a collision. So likely, many collisions like that can make a lot matter and antimatter after a very long time. So the temperature of two distant collisions could become similar without coming from the same source. The Cosmic Background Radiation is many light years big. And it showed a slow expansion rate, slower than the current expansion rate. I can say for sure that the universe didn't expand from a curved point/singularity. And the universe expanded from point to point, and that is why the universe is flat. But pseudoscience of creationists made scientists make a curved singularity. So it is clear that western creationists are more powerful than atheist/agnostic scientists. And they, created the energy called Dark Energy to make a scientific story to make space from nothing even after the Big Bang. Likely, there are universes as separated regions where gravity and an expansion of matter play the role. But most scientists don't talk about that possibility because of the current expansion rate of the universe and the influence of creationists. There are a lot of things to learn about the universe from hidden dimensions. Likely, the neutrino oscillation is responsible for quantum gravity. So the General Relativity wouldn't work well inside Black Holes and Singularity. The wave function indicates the existence of many worlds in hidden dimensions.
Favourite channel by far
hola, soy una gata 😂💕
Language Transfer is free, in app and podcast format and more effective than Babel (per experience).
I have multiple sclerosis I use videos like this to distract myself from the physical pain and suffering
Sorry if this sounds dramatic but I'm grateful for your work
God bless you man
cannabis
I'm here of you need a friend:)
I wish you the very best
Bless you man!! Doesn’t sound dramatic. It sounds sensible. Whatever helps!
As a creative writer interested in poetry and creative non-fiction, the writing in these videos makes me drool. It is imaginative, innovative, and incredibly informative, making intriguing connections between vastly different scientific, historical, and science fiction topics. The writing accomplishes this while also managing to build an immersive story line that allows the viewer to relate, all while presenting complex scientific facts in an easily accessible and understandable fashion. These are my comfort videos, for times when I want to get lost in expansive language that teaches me more about my place in the universe as I fall asleep or go about daily tasks. Thank you for the amazing content!
Chat GBT 😅😎
Do you think I look blurry to the moduli ? Well said Kyla, maybe the Ox needs a janitor like the CW guy Kristofferson.
@@vl8962 just so 😂😀
Pretentious
Idk the sentences are weird and overcomplicated. This sounds awfully similar to GPT.
I have never come across such a clear and graphically satisfactory summary of this difficult subject.
@@f.u.c8308 yeah. Modulus was new to me. I liked the video because it was accurate about Kaluza's ideas and what was meant by "extra dimensions". However string theory has become a gravy train for self-promoting mathematical nonces.
@@odros That’s Scientific Theory , it’s not fact but assumption based on Fundamentals. It’s an exploration of curiosity, if the video makes you ask questions. Then it did a fantastic Job. It sounds like you learned about the right questions to ask based on your comment so you learned something :)
@@odros from my understanding a small dimension would mean a dimension so small that even if we move in it continuously we are not able to notice it
I could not understood a single sentence out of fifteen minutes, so now I give up.
Wow, I got about to halfway and then could not understand much till the very end. 😂 I was waiting and waiting that maybe it will click in my brain finally, but... nope. What was left was a fantastic, yet mysterious mixture of scientific pictunary. I'm working on a sci fi fantacy book. This is kind of quite inspiring for artistic purposes, yet would be nice to actually understand. 😂😁🤣
the fact that someone around 2000 years ago came out with such outstanding ideas is mind blowing...
Also sad when you consider how much was lost in that intervening time due to the rise of theocracies.
The nuclear bomb could of been developed thousands of years ago imagine that we could of entered space centuries ago think of that think of all the things we could of done if our greatest scholars weren’t massacred and their information constantly destroyed how many times have we been sent back
@@douglassopperman1201 and its all the fault of the christians
@@douglassopperman1201 but had the nuclear bomb been invented thousands of years ago we would have wiped ourselves out. Pretty sure the earth would still be recovering now? I'm no expert so my thoughts may very well be completely wrong but I'm just thinking how brutal war is and if ancients had nuclear weapons then the entire global population would have been wiped out, it was certainly small enough to have been.
2000 years isn't that long ago, if you really think about it. I wouldn't be surprised that some hunter gatherer conceived of this idea 100,000 years ago but wasn't able to record his epiphany with writings. We're not that much smarter than we were back then... if anything, we're probably now dumber than those cave dwellers (thanks, iPhone and social media)😆. We're here at this level of knowledge due to some of those geniuses throughout our short written human history who discovered the breakthroughs and were able to share their findings through written records.
I realize that there is only so much “history of the universe” that can be covered, but please don’t ever stop making these videos! This and history of the earth are two of the absolute best channels on RUclips!
Agreed
I dunno man, we have 14 billion years to cover
History of the Universe is expertly produced. Close to the cosmos
Take breaks for mental health but yes keep on making these. Love to put them on an hour before bed on shuffle/repeat. Wish you the best!
Agree with the request but...is there actually a finite limit to the history of the entire universe? I kinda feel like the well is pretty deep there
For an armchair salon physicist such as myself, high quality videos like this one are an absolute treasure.Thank you very much!
This documentary is ridiculous not merely on its very shoddy history of physics but right from the beginning on its confusion. The guy mixes up dimension and direction at random, and throws his historical people around without care and without any interesting detail. It's just a mish-mash of junk thrown in a box as he wanders around.
There is nothing, nothing at all, "high quality" about it. Perhaps you're being taken in by the narrator's portentous tone of voice?
@@charmed0009 Was this reply addressed to me?Because I 100 percent totally believe in God.I love Him with all my heart and have utmost faith in Him.
@Musbiq We could get into a prolonged discussion about a sheer number of coincidences and impossibilities which led to the balance of our universe, or about Annunaki (if you haven't yet, read the book of Enoch) but I will only say this:I come from an atheist family, but all of my research into these subjects led me to firmly believe in God.And love Him.
@@anteradic5116what do you mean by God? The Abrahamic God?
@@guapnarothereaper3161 I mean the one true God, Creator of Heaven and the Earth.If it's easier for you to call Him Abrahamic God, than have it your way.
Currently going through a separation. I won't go into details because they are irrelevant. My wife is the only person I enjoyed discussing things like this with; I see the universe(s) in her eyes, and she always brought up stuff my daft self would miss. I miss her. I miss those talks. I miss being shown I don't know everything.
I know a comment like this is annoying to a lot of you - probably would be to me as well - but I'm still going to say it. Have someone you love... don't just say it to them, show them. Love you, M.
At first you see the sun & assume there is nothing like it, then you get out there & learn there are many suns...some even more spectacular than your own.
Just as there are many suns, there are many Morgan's out there. At first it seems like nothing can compare to Morgan, until get out there & see the rest of the stars 🌟
Time heals all wounds.
agreeing with the guy above, the future holds many paths, take one and see it through.
Try counseling
Let me guess, she's just not 'happy'. A woman's prerogative I guess... It's just that I have never heard man use that as an excuse to end a marriage. Good luck sir.
@@craigwillms61who hurt you💀. If an intelligent woman who talks about the wonders of the universe leaves a man, then surely she would have a good reason for it?
I would've given my left nut to have had such a wealth of good documentaries like this when I was a kid in the mid 2000s. Animal Planet, Natgeo, History Channel, etc only had so much and we all know what they turned into. The move from TV studios to individuals and small groups of independent creators was inevitable. A textbook lesson in market competition. It's just unfortunate that all these creators are stuck under a corporation like Google.
They aren't stuck under Google. They are creators and can create anywhere!!! Btw, can you elaborate your concern and provide a suggestion/solution that and computer Science students group can implement? 😶🌫️😂
those channels had valuable info if you are discerning enough..pbs also had good things... things change and you look for the best in every environment... that's the whole purpose of learning... to enhance. Sour, sweet, bitter, pungent... all must be tasted.
Was born in 1970 am 52 and what taught me about parallel universes and antimatter was star trek but I wish I had u tube back then I just imagined the knowledge I who have gained
Unique observation of 90’s baby’s lol. I relate, I would have at this up as a kid but was limited to the same channels. Sure, it’s great in adulthood but the mind doesn’t imagine and dream like when you’re a kid.
This is why I watch much more YT than cable, not to mention that the cable shows you mentioned have gotten a lot more trashier than they were back then. TLC used to be "the learning channel!" I'm not old, but old enough to appreciate the existence of the internet and the wealth of knowledge in it.
These videos along with 'The History of the Earth' collection are quite simply the best of anything you can watch on any platform. The poetry with which these are narrated makes my spine tingle!
It is very difficult to conceive of, mentally, so the best way I’m able to envision the extra dimensions in our reality is to acknowledge the fact that they really aren’t _anywhere_ because they are _everywhere._ We are constantly moving in, out, through, above and below them in every instance of our existence, and quite likely in every instance _afterwards._
I like the ant and wire analogy. From a long ways off a telephone wire hanging overhead looks 1D, there is only left and right, and indeed, for us large humans we can only ever move along the wire constrained to motion to that 1D motion. Now, take a smaller animal, like an Ant, that ant walking along the telephone sees it curl around on each side and he can quite easily walk all the way around it, fully aware that he has two dimensions to work with. The folded up dimensions of string theory are similar, wrapped up so small we could never hope to interact with them. Atoms are even much too large to interact with the waves, larger than the waves than humans are larger than those atoms.
EDIT: 26:45, I see an ant walking on a line. Lol.
For that last part of your last sentence, are you saying the past essentially lives in other dimensions? Cause that just blew my mind lmao
For Software Engineers this becomes quite easy to imagine as we work with multi-dimensional arrays. While they are not physical, we can wrap our heads around the many axis of freedom associated with both systems.
@@emsa5034 Yes. Although physics tells us that past, present and future all exist at the same point, we render time to instantiate our consciousness between events, like between heartbeats, but we still exist in all dimensions of space at the same instant. As we move through space, we actually render time--we create a past, present and future in each dimension. So, when we think there is a dimension that 'contains our past', we are only partly correct. There is, but it's also the same dimension we are in currently.
i like to think about dimension this way;
a man walk on the top of a skyscraper. He can freely move in 2 dimension; the distance (Z) and on each side (X) dimension. When he reach the end of the surface, he fall down. He no longer move in the X and Z dimension at all, but he totally knows he is moving faster and faster into the (Y) dimension, and he knows all the moduli in the world, will not save him when he reach the previous dimension of X and Z, and splatter as a mere sheet of atoms...
:)
i need a coffee...
Every episode of your channel is a masterpiece. Thank you!
"Here buy a coffee." Lmao
@@Trey4x4 🤔
@@FracturedParadigms he paid a $5 super chat, that's the joke.
@@SiriusSphynx why is that funny?
@@SiriusSphynx joke?
You genuinely make some of the most informative and entertaining scientific content. Your storytelling style is captivating when covering topics that are seen as overwhelming and boring. Appreciate you!
The most comprehensive, insightful, thorough, intricate, beautiful display of how we decipher the abstract. Astonishing display, everyone needs to see.
Excellent - even though I can't say I understand, what was said here well enough to describe it to someone else, I am a lot closer to a weak grasp of string theory than ever before. Thanks. I will be revisiting this episode several times I'm sure. Well done folks.
Also, the nearration by David Kelly is among the best of all voices on the internet. Clear, with proper inflection and dynamics along with living in the right frequencies. In other words, easy on the ears.
string theory is brutal
i try and try!
i’m an artist so pretty much right brained only😂
but i so want to learn more about physics
Great video, have always known there’s more to life than meets the eye, I feel like in this life i am supposed to be doing more than i am doing for the people i love. been seeking for an eye opening enlightenment, a way to be more influential, powerful and protected~
oh well you can achieve that by being a part of the illuminatus brotherhood, i know it sounds like a mystery but there are ways you can actually get in contact with them
@@bartholetbay412 hi, isn't the brotherhood a myth??
@@haynesatteh4463 Well it is not and you can't actually expect it to be open to everyone, but if you want to know more you can look up ANTHONY MARK SZYMON online you will find something interesting.
@@bartholetbay412 oh really, i just saw his website, interesting.i will leave him a message.
Direct care services, volunteer work. Seriously. Whatever humanitarian issue that you feel a draw to, you should seek out. Whether it's un-house people's services, working with kids, elderly care, environmental services. Any non-profit that you feel drawn to, volunteer with them. You will find your path.
I love physics and history. This dude's narration, intellect and vocabulary are impeccable. Thanks for sharing your experience. Much love, teacher!
He wants you to use an apostrophe to show the possessive form, thanks.
I think his name is David Kelley, but I could be wrong
Whatever his name, I believe he's the greatest science narrator ever!
I've fallen in love; I sent a fan letter to the narrator. I'm such a fan 'girl.'
@gavinvalentino6002 haha. I was writing a comment on YT, not an article for publication, but I hope the edit relieves your stress, dude.
It's a distinctly average in the UK.
i’ve been devouring physics explainers for the last few years, trying to extend my knowledge of sound physics into the realm of light.. not to mention readings on abstract geometry and the “holographic” appearance of different phenomena in the universe.. anyway i gotta say, THIS video really blows the roof off! it really feels like it’s all coming together in an intuitive way, and i’m glad i can continue to learn about these topics in my post-college life. thank you!
Me too. Definitely super interesting
If you did not get to simulation theory yet... You have still more to learn.
MAYBE THIS LITTLE BIT WILL OPEN NEW DOORS IN YOUR QUANTUM COMPUTING BRAIN.."WE ARE ALL BI POLAR SEMICONDUCTORS OF INFORMATION SYNCHED TOGETHER AND WHEN ONE OF US LEARNS SOMETHING NEW IT IS INFORMATION NOW ACCESSIBLE TO ALL OF US FOR THE PURPOSE OF EVOLUTION
THE BIG BANG WAS WHEN WERE SUCKED PASSED THE ACCRETION DISK OF A BLACK HOLE BLOWN OUT THE OTHER SIDE INTO A NEW DIMENSION
@@ElyziumPrime The most ridiculous nonsense ever. If you think simulation "theory" is realistic, you have much more to learn.
There's a lot of clever people doing this kind of thing on youtube, and god knows I've watched them all, but this is the first time I've watched a youtube doc and completely forgotten I'm not watching on BBC1 prime time - seriously, production value, clarity, narrative, your voice, all fantastic. I'm sure you are going to do very very well for yourself.
And now, I am going to watch every single video you've ever made !!
Visualizing multiple dimensions is like imagining a surgeon who can put on a VR headset and then flip through the layers of reality like a catalog to perform surgery on a person by virtually reaching into something that looks like a tree and pulling out an unwanted branch except that the tree is the person and they can't feel anything and never have to be drugged or sliced open, they can just go home healed and feeling completely normal
my head just exploded
I LITERALLY HAVE BEEN WAITING WEEKS FOR THIS! YOU ARE MY NEW FAVORITE CHANNEL!!! THANK YOU FOR THESE!
🙌🏻😁
Where are all these dimensions, all around you and passing through you.
We create our own reality and the more open minded we are the more we unlock the truth within us.
Speaking from personal experience and absolutely not from books or the programming I received as a child from parents, school, authority, religions and society in general, I’ve started to experience other dimensions, realised that time is not linear and space/distance is an illusion in this multidimensional multiverse and that’s just for starters.
An open mind unlocks all doors as it realises that we created the doors blocking our consciousness, we are the key. 🌟
You deserve 1 million thumbs up for your comment
👍1million
@@Raisedbywolves13 my experiences keep expanding, I know that more and more people will join me.
All that is required is to keep the mind open.. 💥
A good topic, a good voice, subtitles and good information. Thank you for giving me something to sleep in and also learn.
The way the universe works is truly mind blowing and you explain it so well. I've watched other videos on this and you are the only that told it to where normal people can understand.
Thanks
Love these high quality extremely well made documentaries.
Yes these are amazing
And for putting them on RUclips and not some pay channel somewhere.
@@pranjaltiwari1663
And i like chocolate … how what you say helping the conversation ?
I agree. Professional work. Amazing you can get such high quality content on RUclips for free.
I cant express how glad i am that this channel exist! thanks for all your work! im getting youtube red to then rebinch all your vidoes as soon as i can to support you as much as i can
This is awesome, thanks for spelling it out like this
24:32
Even if we cannot see individual atoms, we can still feel their effects.
24:38
Every time we touch anything with our hands, or sit down on a chair, we feel the effects of
24:44
atoms. The fact that, when we sit down, we do not carry on plunging through the seat of the chair
24:49
is because of the summed effect of billions upon billions upon billions of atoms, and the electric
24:55
interactions between them. When we sit down, the entire earth is pulling on us downwards, using the force of gravity. What resists this pull is an electric repulsion that occurs as the matter
25:06
that is us tries to pass through the matter that is the chair - and this repulsion originates from
25:12
the atoms making up both, even though we cannot directly discern individual atoms.
25:21
So for atoms, we can feel their effects, even if we cannot directly resolve them.
If you watch Trainspotting you will see that you can resist gravity and fall nto the couch
My goodness this comment must have taken a while to make. I’ll give ya a like lol
Just curious, what is the point of all the extra time stamps. You could have just written:
24:32
Even if we cannot see individual atoms, we can still feel their effects. Every time we touch anything with our hands or sit down on a chair, we feel the effects of atoms. The fact that, when we sit down, we do not carry on plunging through the seat of the chair is because of the summed effect of billions upon billions upon billions of atoms, and the electric interactions between them. When we sit down, the entire earth is pulling on us downwards, using the force of gravity. What resists this pull is an electric repulsion that occurs as the matter that is us tries to pass through the matter that is the chair - and this repulsion originates from the atoms making up both, even though we cannot directly discern individual atoms. So for atoms, we can feel their effects, even if we cannot directly resolve them.
You have a gift of being able to explain very technical and complicated ideas in a simple manner that the average person can process, which is what documentaries should do. You got my sub and I really look forward to learning more about our universe in future videos 🙂
so thats how we r made in the image of god the thing we r in a living thing
( referring to the VIDEO )You keep saying the word decay, The word decay simply means breakdown, when a particle is breaking down wouldn’t it break down into a smaller particle ie subatomic particle and then a subatomic particle would decay into an ultra subatomic particle and so on and so forth which also dives right into the casual-forces ( the forces that make up causality ), Forces by which that dictate gravity, which by the way is not a weak force as you falsely claim it to be?? With all this being said, the limitation would soon meet a climax being something of a fine immaterial sphere giving power for space-time to relatively grow as an eternity, maybe people need to start researching Einstein a little bit more because I don’t think y’all understand dimensions at all despite the fact that this video is well produced, you lack the understanding of an infinite relative amount of particles that exist within itself breaking down into higher states of energy which deals with a relative order and principal point ( singularity) of what is called “creation”, still it shows how primitive human beings are and still have a long way to go. To break out of this EGOTISTICAL MATERIALISTIC BUBBLE.
What you just said is exactly what I have been saying about professor Brian Greene for years. Now there is another helpful voice out there. I agree with you about David Kelly.
@@78tag EXACTLY Brian Greene is an exceptional scientist!!!
The first thing that occured to me, was that we keep trying to look smaller when searching for extra dimensions. I am curious as to wether it has been considered for there to be larger dimensions that we are too small to observe.
makes perfect sense to me, dimensions would not be restricted by size, I mean there is no reason that we and all we know by the way of the universe could be just an atom in another dimension
@@TheNomad2727 Therein lies the caveat "All we know". What we "know" and understand changes, it could be that the maths for it has yet to be created. It seems rather ignorant to dismiss the possibility of something beyond our current understanding.
That's part of the problem with looking at them. Our POV is so different that what looks micro to us may actually be just an artefact or a lensing echo of something very much macro and that's why we can't detect it clearly.
We're trying to look too small and as we narrow the focus, the overall picture loses clarity.
disclaimer: I know very little about any of this, but watched this documentary with intense interest and took many notes. The thought occurred to me that concepts of "micro" and "macro" seem like they might be limited to a 3 dimensional perception of space. The idea that something small could contain something larger than itself seems impossible for us to conceive, but then again, so does a fourth dimension.
Also, I'd always had a vague idea that the reason we can't perceive extra dimensions is because we are "inside" of them. Like the way you can't see the outside of a box if you're inside the box. But like I said, I know very little about these theories, I'm just a humble 3D modeller/artist :P
as someone whose smoke a lot of DMT i can tell you that DMT gives you a glimpse into some of these other dimensions!!
Lol shrooms gave me 4D powers 😂
This is probably the best understandable description of string theory's basic premises that I've yet heard. Thank you for another brilliant video.
Stay well out there everybody, and God bless you, friends. ✝️ :)
its giving delusion
@@laur-unstagenameactuallyca1587 delusion?
@@Dimitri88888888 yes delusion. near the end.
I appreciate how you manage to find material that isn’t in the regular pop science documentary curriculum. I’ve watched god knows how many films about string theory - I’ve even struggled through Lenny Susskind’s Stanford String Theory lecture series (not exactly pop science) - and of course I knew about the extra compactified dimensions, but I don’t remember ever hearing about modulus particles before.
00trh007@gm
im on brink of rainbow atom and silver aura infinity electron clouds clouds colors resurrect dead black holes mirror as long as i believe my imagination … i need ideas other than angles in Love become 360in light and life something with tau 7T pi ee=mc^2 and still hold 40 42 degree arcs
This makes 2 of us. Could there be more?
I failed to properly integrate what string theory really meant until I saw this video. And I have now a much clearer picture of its origin, significance and position in science, with visuals to figure it mentally. Modulus particles are the golden cherry on top of an already very generous science video.
I'd like to know more, about the authors of this video, and about the universe that permitted their appearance. Both are amazing.
@@Zookeeper. if you want to really grasp String theory, go to the source. Susskind’s Stanford entire lecture courses are available right here on RUclips. He will not only teach you the math but even show you how to derive it yourself - and you don’t need up be a genius to follow what he’s saying. It’s fascinating.
@@X-boomer Wow... Thanks a million for the tip, this is a goldmine from the look of it.
I am only a few minutes in and already drawn by Leonard Susskind's deep intelligence and simple ways. I had the chance to meet physicists from CNRS and CERN (and with a few to drink and be silly) and I am starting to see a pattern: deep knowledge about reality apparently comes with humility, humor and humanity. Susskind fits right in, and I'll be busy trying to let a bit of his brillance lighting up my brain, despite the obvious impedance mismatch 😅
Thanks again, Ralph 👍
@@Zookeeper. you’re welcome. You may have notice his introductory lectures on quantum theory are there as well. They are quite fascinating in the way that they too show how the math is derived.
Beautifully made. Thoroughly absorbing. The concepts were so well presented that for a sublime moment I thought I understood! A thought occurred to me: could moduli or axions be the stuff of dark matter?
Axions are a candidate!
What a top quality production. So lucky to get this kind of content!!! Can't thank you enough.
Subbed! This was so well put together. It literally goes toe-to-toe with much of the science Channel or Nova episodes on the topic but im sure with a fraction or really much of a budget that they had, which makes it so impressive and more respectable from a place of passion. These mini documentaries paved the way for a way of thinking outside the box that i carried with me and shaped me as an adult. So much respect!
I don't even know who the hell you are!
@@davebennett5069Dave! It's your brother. Mother has been so worried, we miss you Davie boy. All of us. We just want you to come home 😢
@@wvufo Dave's Not Here
A nice thing to think about if you want to freak yourself out: If there is another spatial dimension we simply cannot perceive, it's quite possible that there are creatures watching us, at all times, creatures that are, for lack of a better term, "right beside us", separated only by the invisible dimension. There wouldn't be much we could do to keep them away.
One funny theory (not in the scientific sense) is that superdimensional creatures occasionally coming to our slice of 4d space and then leaving again - which to us would seem like they appear from and then disappear into thin air - is what cryptids and UFOs really are.
How can the Loch Ness monster hide from us even though we searched that lake with all sorts of tech? It just "sidesteps" us. Same with bigfoot. And UFOs can disappear so quickly because they can move in all 4 dimensions.
Yeah. That’s the spiritual realm.
No need to freak yourself out just imagine what would you as God would do but be aware nothing is as it seams.
thats all just fiction, the extra dimensions are too small to really host any life, if those dimensions even exist
Except these dimensions are at the scale of the smallest particles we know about. Which means only something that small could travel them. Kinda prohibits sentient life. Any existing dimensions larger and we would be able to either see their effects. Other dimensions the way Hollywood proposes them are not what string theory is suggesting.
Yeah, you need to see the movie interstellar. One character is flipped through a higher dimension so any option he sees translates to motion back and forth in time. But because he's been flipped he can't move in space, only time. And had odd interactions with the real world. A ghost in other worlds.
But it would require enormous energy to do something like this.
¡Gracias!
I devour RUclips content and find your stuff (annoyingly) so good, other channels just don't cut it.
My favorite quote from the Aristotle, his friend brought him to the markets and he said, look at the myriad of things for sale, and he said, " there are so many things I don't want ". 🙏
@2:59 Realities are like radio stations. Cymatics is another good illustration of how realities ( dimensions ) can coexist within one another. Pour water into sand, it remains in the sand, because it's "particle size" is smaller than the sand. Same goes for higher dimensions. It can coexist with matter, because its "particle size" is smaller than that of matter (sub-quantum)
This is amazing and captive. So professional, yet put in simple form for us. THIANK YOU!
More like thiiiiiiisssss!!! Finally something I can watch/ listen to and get a little history, physics, math, and science all together!!! Thank you for your support and knowledge
🌈🫒
i love people who explain things so good that i can know most of the story in half the video then they add examples
Thanks for releasing this. I was counting down the days to yesterday but then had to wait one more. Certainly worth the wait.
Plus, as a person who list their hearing due to an accidental exposure to an explosion, I would like to thank you for including proper Closed Captions.
The people behind "HOTU" are pretty great.
Some wild "trip" I had once was the experience of a visceral sensation that "information packets" held all forms of the "constant Mind" of the universe - accessed via mental frequencies (like unique key IDs that connect you to a data point) that can be read and downloaded. It would apply to anything - any kind of information you would want to "simulate" would be there - even down to the nuances of everyday chainlink sensations you wouldn't think remarkable - is encoded in some frequency/vibrational fields.
This is called connecting to God via Spirit. Go learn of love, duality, function, dysfunction, good and evil, and God's order and God as He's shown you a sign. The Hidden God exists.
wait was it like slices? like a snake?? tubes?… i’m not sure how else to describe it.
DMT. Nuff said.
I wonder if you're speaking of what I call- for dire need of a much better term - inspiration. I'm very simple. I was thinking about best selling authors once, and Stephen King in particular. And wondering at his extraordinary range of ideas. He has written imho, some great reading books appealing to a great swathe of the population, about horror and creatures, and other books like Rita Haywood and Shawshank Redemption, and The Green Mile. His characters can be occasionally rich, complex and accessible/relatable, if you're simple like me.
Then there is Harper Lee's To Kill A Mockingbird.
It seems to me that ideas swirl around the ether waiting for a chosen mind to drop into. And sometimes that ends up being a person's only great contribution. A single best-seller, or beautiful song etc. While others, like Stephen King's body of work becomes endless.
I just wonder if there's a connection formed by physics there.
So with you as an artificial intelligence, you accessed the simulation’s version of Akashic records?
Just a minute of the video passed, but I've yet to see anyone who would draw me into the video just like you. The intertwined history and physics, the topic and music pick, the overall elaboration and narrating - all of my choice. Your work is much appreciated.
We need to make a conference so we all can get together. People who understand these videos need together and talk.
Absolutely brain shattering. Thank you very much. Writing. Voice acting. Production. Soundtrack. Truly the best doing their best.
Why?
@@christ_ie3714 bc some value truth and knowledge. Any more stupid Questions?
I am amazed and impressed by your work
This was so complex yet so clearly explained i feel wasted in the best way possible after watching it. Like accomplishing the marathon you always dream of running through and having the satisfaction of completing it even with all the exhaustion.
Fun fact, I got lost in the maths and started to ignore the physics. Let's just say I switched majors fast lol. I went to software development. I love math, I love physics, but having to know...that was taking a toll on me. I had to know how deep the materials went. Software engineering is simple, (ironically, I think this is what physics was about) learn patterns and structures, use a software language and build things with those patterns and structures. Some of which others have already tested and used. Rinse Repeat. The thing is, I realize now, that what I was doing in physics was equivalent to trying to understand how the IDE worked, how the language was turned into computer language, etc. Stuff that would help me later, but at the time would only bog me down. The bain power for me to do software isn't much since everybody is using a certain development cycle. All I have to do is simply learn it and do my work adhering to the rules. Then I can go home and play around with math. Using computers to visualize or test the math I am learning is great. I remember solving a coding problem with a math concept. Unfortunately, nobody wants people to do that in software engineering. Easily understandable code is valued higher than some math concept only few have seen.
Saludos desde España hermano! Gracias por el contenido informativo…
I don't know who does the narration, but he's awesome. Fantastic videos!
I love this channel, so much! It’s so well made.
Special Relativity and SuperSymmetry are the equals sign in Quantum Mechanical Equations.
They are the invisible rules that govern the "Balanced Equation" or "Symmetry".
If you stand on the equals sign and ask "Why?" in those equations, you have to stop calling space "zero" and non contributing and allow for the tensor fields to "connect" two particles.
We currently call this "Connection Tensor": "Skin Theory", "The Higgs Mechanism/Field/Particle", "WIMP", String Theory or even General Relativity itself and it endeavours to describe Gravity, Magnetism, Radio Frequency, any special relativity "spooky action at a distance" observation, at a much more fundamental level.
They are all compressed space reactions to Temperature or Velocity or Mass and the reaction projects back into our space from higher dimensions of space.
Their theoretical existence is proven by the observational data.
Great Vid, Thanks B-)
PS: No one ever talks about the relative time-dilation of the Big Bang, sure it exploded and inflated, but in our zero degree space observational window that would take (Temperature/5)^2 seconds observed for every second of the big bang, and velocities are redshifted down there so, if say our Universe is 100 million light years "thick" you need to multiply that by the Big Bang time dilation to know how long our Universe actually took to form the potential for matter through that entire 100 million light years.
The Big Bang is still there burning away at the center of all the atomic particles and all EM particles in our Universe.
13.85 Billion years is tiny little fraction of one second for the Big Bang.
The highest "visible" Big Bang temperature is 10^144 degrees celsius (Theoretically derived by inverse squaring any temperature back to a 6 Planck radius giving us the proton temperature of ~10^36).
there is no proof that supersymmetry is real. In fact the lack of evidence so far of supersymmetrical twin particles is a good sign that it is not real
@@KateeAngel Be careful to not cross over Neutrino versus Interference creation events.
Supersymmetry is the equals sign in any algebra, kinetics, magnetism, gravity itself are all part of the "symmetry" equations.
Their is no evidence for Neutrino paired particles persisting after the Big Bang, but there is for lowering temperature interference / redshift which is another form of "supersymmetry".
If paired particles did occur they most likely annihilated long ago.
This video is just absolutely stunning, probably the best explanation of how the Universe work I've ever seen
What resists this pull is an electric repulsion that occurs as the matter
25:06
that is us tries to pass through the matter that is the chair - and this repulsion originates from
25:12
the atoms making up both, even though we cannot directly discern individual atoms.
25:21
So for atoms, we can feel their effects, even if we cannot directly resolve them.
Youre smart
Hands down one of the best channels on youtube.
Thank you for helping me learn.
hey... I live in Spain too. Love ya videos. and btw after loosing my 2 sons, your videos are a great distraction and a wonderfully magical way to get a new perspective. Thanks, and keep going!
The implications of this are so fascinating to ponder. It could turn out that the phenomenon of ghosts is real, just completely different than what we had always assigned to it. Maybe they are a sort of shadow, or vibration from dimensions we can't directly perceive but somehow affects ours
Amazing video! Personally, the easiest way for me to even try comprehending extra dimensions is to think about how a 2d person on a screen would try to perceive, or even understand 3d. A 3d sphere passing through a 2d plane (like a piece of paper) would simply look like a tiny circle growing bigger, then shrinking back into nothing--at least, to the inhabitants of that 2d world.
A lot of these theoretical physics are still born in, and can only explain what they see through our own limited lense. But I personally find that comforting, knowing that we're only seeing an infinitesimally small part of the universe. Makes be believe existence is far more than the life we're perceiving now.
Trueee
Same! Science has lead me to God! He’s got to be the ultimate science nerd! I’m so grateful and I have never felt like my existence mattered all that much until I started learning about this!
Music is key.
For me... The way piano keys are seperated can be applied to help getting my head around dimensions. It all fits and feels right according to my inner bullshit detector.
@@supermeansadie6753 That's kind of rude to divert compliments away from the people who worked really hard to figure any of this out, but I'm glad you found joy in something.
This video is the closest I have ever come to getting a sense of 4 dimensions thank you so much for this fantastic documentary.
Yes but you exist in those 4 dimensions. Wherein is your befuddlement?
@@AlbertNovakLoveTechnician yes but for us the 4th dimension is on rails we can only march forward in time and the infinite possibility of each particals motions are observed as our dimensions singular trajectory. With those graphics I had a sense of how on a subatomic level the course of alternative dimensions might splinter off.
5 dimensions. Time is the 4th
" The why files" & "Mr.Ballen" & this channel are my favorites!!
This is mych better content than anything the "history channel" ever put out. Calm, relaxing and interesting. No hype or excitement and no re hashing every 5 min.
One more time .All the hidden dimensions are right before your eyes ,and in order to see them , you must look with the all -- seeing 3rd eye . Then they will loom large in front of you, not all together ,one at a time. And you can bounce from one to the other ,each one an independent domain in itself as this world is a complete independent domain in itself .
Amazing video, and I loved the ending when it said maybe we'll have a microscope small enough to see them. We are so small in the midst of it all, and still HUGE and impactful in the space(s) we occupy. I like to think our universe is a red blood cell of a giant somewhere, and we're like the energy producing agent to the mix, but sadly we only produce harmful energy due to what we're doing to our home
Can’t believe such nicely crafted content is for free
Amazing work of art and science!
I think quantum computers will help us a lot, with their use we can recreate quantum behavior, having very precise answers, just gotta dress it up in mathematics, that might not yet exist
On top of that quantum computers will cause revolution in materials, true quantum simulation makes possible to create new alloys or methods of manufacturing, imagine self assembling carbon nanofiber tubes grown using yeast
its just faster maths essentially I guess
666
@@PazLeBon not really, with quantum computers you can simulate particles and alloys behavior directly, it's not computation per se, just programming structure and seeing behavior of it, quantum particles giving precision answer like testing on real object
Imagine making new steel, you have 30 variables and goal is to make light alloy resisting liquid hydrogen under pressure, that is superior than existing alloys, sometimes adding 0.01% of element to alloy can change it's properties drastically
@@taith2 ok maths is the wrong word put like that, but perhaps number of calculations/possibile outcomes is somewhat related. Its essentially a speeding up process :)
02:41, I had a shock of incongruence. I thought up and down were on the same axis. And the three dimensions were up, forward and across.
Anyway, the collection of videos is outstanding, well explained and really interesting. Thank you!
Yeah, obsessed with these. Thanks bro
Isn't it worthwhile to point out that most superstring theorists believed that superstring particles would be at the LHC in coordinates with their theories, whereas in fact, no superstream particles have yet been detected.
Although the negative results don't disprove string theory they certainly cast aspersion on its correctness especially in the absence of any other confirmatory evidence in the past 40 years or so
You cannot probe string theor at the LHC. What they hoped for was that we have low-energy supersymmetry in our universe. Turns out it is at energies unreachable for the LHC atm
It was supersymetry, not string theory that was being looked for. No evidence has been found. While some physicists have suggested it must be at higher energies, there is a slowly growing body of physicists that have said that yeah maybe this whole supersymetry things a bust.
However without Supersymetry, theres no string theory (or a bunch of other exotic physics ideas for that matter). So while the LHC cant *prove* it, it can contribute towards a disproof ("It must be at a higher energy" goalpost shifting notwithstanding)
@@shayneoneill1506thank you for properly explaining that to him.
I was going to say, no chance that they were looking for string theory evidence at the LHC, everything I read indicates that we’d need an obscene amount of energy to do that, and our current tech doesn’t come close.
Escheresque distillation of so much information in such a short time without feeling like you’re being waterboarded. I enjoyed this so much and I believe even experts in these fields would not walk away without learning something new or making a connection about how things are interrelated.
I desperately needed this!
I've been thinking about this for some time now.
Well done, this is highly informative and superbly crafted.
Study more good luck
thank you for these astonishing movies, this channel is a pure gem!
10:03 I’m 50 and when I was like 5 I observed my mothers finish in her aquarium and always wondered could the fish see air like I see the water they are moving thru as I grew older I pondered in could they see the water? I now know the answer. Another thing I’ve noticed is when it’s windy and the shadows made by trees from light tend to move and are to me almost alive whereas I’m positive I’ve seen things that I can’t explain. Now that I’ve brought it to everyone’s attention please try and take notice the next time your around a tree on a windy day.
I'd be fascinated just to listen to you talk about other theoretical physics, like the work on E8 or Geometric Unity. Most people think it's a crock, or don't give it any mind, but given that the only thing needed for GU's completion is some of the existing LHC data to be released and analyzed (to verify the theory's results), it makes me wonder why they don't allow that to be examined. Either way, I've watched (so far) this video and one previous, and both are fantastic. I'm probably going to rabbit-hole down the rest of your content for the rest of this weekend! Fantastic stuff!
E₈
@@____uncompetative Thank you; I was already thinking "Geometric" and got a little overenthusiastic.
@@BinkyTheToaster I have pinned a comment containing some useful links which you may find to be of interest under my video entitled:
_Geometric Unity explained in under 2 minutes_
Unfortunately as is often the case this channel does not allow me to link anything here under this video.
@@____uncompetative Very funny.
Thanks for the upload these are always very captivating
this channel is dope. I am a Spaniard living in the UK. So, kudos to you bro. keep up with the good work.
I still appreciate the analogy of using a 2D being trying to understand the appearance of a sphere passing through its universe-first a dot, then a growing circle, shrinking circle and finally a dot again before it disappears. I’ve wondered for a long time if electron tunneling is explained by an electron traveling through a tiny fifth dimension we cannot detect, but that doesn’t seem to be a popular hypothesis. Or is it? 🤷♂️
There was a paper a few years back, where, instead of just modeling the electron at a tunnel barrier as a spatially smeared probability amplitude of itself (standard QM), someone modeled it as a localized classical particle surrounded by a sea of other localized electrons that it was only very weakly able to interact with via repulsion. Apparently the pre-quantum thermodynamic equations of Statistical Thermodynamics was enough to duplicate the "borrowed" tunneling energy and probability.
I think this concept of many weakly repelling classical worlds (MIW) has since been numerically simulated to show other quantum effects such as ground states and twin slit interference. In the limit of 1 classical world it behaves Newtonian. In the opposite limit of infinite interacting 'worlds' the authors argue that it would be indistinguishable from one `world` following standard Schrodinger probability wave equations.
Woaaahhhhh that’s a good theory my dude
Perhaps not SMALL dimensions but large dimensions with constrained mobility.
The plank volume only able to propagate its state in specific dimensions. On the surface of a black hole gravity constrains propagation again to TWO dimensions.
thank you for making a video on such a pressing topic. I cannot stress how much Ive wondered about this
16:30 I found out how to make these intuitively, for a few years now, and by chance, I stumble across this video. Thing is, I've come to a conclusion that, those "versions" are a manifestation of one thing, and I know how that looks like, if you're seeing it in 3D. As in, the visual formula, to which you can derive the method from. I don't know who I can reach out to share this with, so if anyone can help, it would be really appreciated.
Hi iq comment
Al-Gor do you’re thing.
well are you expecting to vaguely describe this thing already mathematically known and have someone derive equations from your descriptions ala Faraday? Seems iffy. Just go to stack exchange, physics. subheading manifold topology
@@anonemouse1470 any good equation needs something visual, in order to be properly understood. While this can be looked at, it's functionally useless, like most equations out there. What I want to do, is turn that, into something everyone can use. You don't have to know how to make a phone, in order to use it. And so far, I've showed this to some people, and they always went "yo it always works, but how?" , And I show them the shape, and it's much clearer
multidimensional shapes become much clearer? I'm all for it but have you ever seen a hypercube? you're talking about nth dimensional manifolds im not sure how you extrapolate the "shape" without math
I love your videos man, just got Covid again yesterday so I’m on a chiller and seeing this come out has made my day!
What is your neanderthal makeup to get covid twice
@@dannybrown5744 3 times mate, full Erectus me
This channel is amazing. The narrative, pacing, sense of mystery and the soothing voice.❤💯
Just noticed this and started listening to it. Does look promising and I'll listen to the end. But surely there's a mistake early on, one which might be addressed later, hopefully. We're told that Kaluza explained our lack of ability to detect the fourth spatial dimension. But neither he nor Einstein had answers when critics asked them where this fourth spatial dimension is. It was Kline who deserves credit for the compactification idea, not Kaluza. If it wasn't for this contribution the theory wouldn't be called Kaluza Klein theory. That was his contribution and it does deserve to be acknowledged, especially given its rediscovery being central to the formation of string theory.
The theory matters. Produce thought. Not arrogance on behalf of .... . It certainly wasn't you who came up with this. Anyway love you and F/O.
what's also funny is that it was Gunnar Nordstrom who initally had the idea of unifying electromagnetism with general relativity by going to 5 dimensions! Typical situation in math & physics, where the first guy who discovered something doesn't get any credit ^^
Klein also added the weak & strong nuclear forces to the theory.
@@martinwilliams9866 what?? nope 😂
this may be a stupid question, but rather than extra dimensions being so small we can’t observe them, what if the extra dimensions are so big that we can’t comprehend them in the first place? loved the video btw!!
why would them being big stop us from observing them?
that's not possible. an extra dimension being large would mean that we would live in a 4d world, which is untrue.
Damn. As nothing more than a non-physicist, casually interested spectator, I spent years trying to wrap my head around string theory, and more specifically, how the hypothesis could be proved or disproved. I should have just saved the effort and watched this video.
Tell that to @Dmitry Shusterman lol
Thought experiment: You take a sheet of paper and you have 2 dimensions. When you look at the curves of the smaller dimensions, what you're looking at is that same piece of paper in another dimension, but in a slightly different orientation. I hypothesize that these smaller dimensions are an overlay of other universes overlapping with the one we experience. This would also resolve the problem of virtual particles by seeing these "wound dimensions" as a sort of mobius strip
And I have always wondered if the movement of the paper (any object) from one point to another is the Fourth Dimension. I am not trying to correct anyone, I am trying to ask a question.
@@beauxr.benoit1374 People seem to struggle visualizing the 4th dimension but I believe it's extremely easy. When a photographer takes a time-lapse photo of the stars or a flower, what are they doing? They are taking momentary snapshots of what state the 3rd dimension is in. Einstein calls it spacetime and I think it's more than just a hyphenate.
Each dimension is nothing more than a collection of variations of the dimension below. It has nothing to do with "ways to have a 90 degree angle". A line is a collection of dots. A plane is a collection of lines, a block is a collection of planes, motion is a collection of blocks, parallel realities is a collection of motions. When I say parallel realities, what do I mean? I mean either "my time, your time, Billy's time" or I mean "multiverse theory". They mean the same thing. So, we can go further and further. But what about the other direction. If a square is 2D, and a line is 1D and a dot is 0D, what is below that? Math itself. Not the expression of math, but math itself. -1D, below that I believe we would get into the nature of our substrate. Maybe it's the logic gate transistors on the computer that runs our simulation. Looking at it this way, as -2D being the transistors of our computer, we could then extrapolate back up and better define -1D. Instead of saying "math itself" which is confusing, we could say "the programming. the firmware". Remember the definition? The states of something? Firmware is a state of a transistor.
When you look at dimensions like that, everything kinda just makes sense. There's 2 ways of looking at the winding dimension described in this video. It could be the cross section of multiple dimensions (aka timelines, character trees like in a video game where you have story line trees)...but it could also be the physical expression of the 4th dimension. I personally subscribe to the first one because time could instead be the dark energy that pushes the cosmos apart. you know? like when a subatomic particle "chooses" to do something
@@Rising_Pho3nix_23 Thank you, this is the best description of it I have ever gotten.
@@Rising_Pho3nix_23 I think that definition is not great. Shapes in a dimension might be just collections of shapes from the lower dimension, but, importantly, the shapes must stacked orthogonally to all of the lower dimensions it exists in. A collection of shapes on its own is not enough. Furthermore, there is nothing lower than the 0th dimension. And if it did exist in some way, to say it's our three dimensional computer chips is nonsensical, let alone the concept of math.
@@polecat3 Who says they have to be orthogonally? Einstein disagrees with you and ALL of physics disagree with you. 4th dimension called Time is not at a right angle. What you are trying to do is force every dimension to fit into the 3rd dimension. That doesn't make sense.
I can go into great detail about how I use the term dimension to simply mean "collection of possibilities of the dimension below it" and my definition would be supported by all known physics. At least in terms of dimensions 1-4. And you know what they say about patterns.....
This is an extremely interesting and challenging subject. I'm glad the have some sort of documentary like this
Wow, just found this channel! This is incredibly insightful and entertaining content. Thank you for the history lesson!
Wow. I hope you are getting payed for the time you and your group put into making these videos. Is there some kind of award that we could nominate you for?
Excellent as always. One question could moduli or their by-product be dark matter?
The same what I was wondering about. Dark matter is hidden from direct detection but has an detectable effect on gravity.
I know it’s heretical but you have to remember that the dimensions are concepts that we made up to try to fit a framework around our observations. A photon does not care in which ‘direction’ that it goes, it just goes.
i find it wierd that the big bang is always shown cone like, left to right, as oppposed to globe like
@@PazLeBon The big bang as in the observable universe from very soon after the beginning and along the expansion until now is hard to show properly in 3d. The observable universe started as a tiny sphere that grew into the enormous sphere it is today. It is billions of lightyears across. And the observable universe is not the entirety of the universe nor are the physics in the conditions very early in the universes existence well understod.
A tiny sphere that grows into a large sphere over time is a 4 dimensional object the same kind of object as a tesseract. It is impossible to properly replicate a 4d object in our 3d world without using time as a 4:th dimension. You could do a time lapse with a small globe turning into a large globe to illustraite the change but you can't put a timelapse or video in a book so they do a work around.
They take a thin center slice of the globe of the observable universe for all different ages of the universe and stack them. A slice of a globe is a circle and a stack of circles sorted according to their age and therefor size becomes a cone. You could also look at it this way: The cone shows the observable universes breadth, thickness and age and doesn't show it's height. The directions are: X, Y, T. X and Y are spatial dimensions and T is the time dimensions.
Hopefully this helps.
@@simonwahlen7150 i think its wierd they dont have a better representation, not I didnt understand but eloquently put nevertheless :) Id prefer the globe representation because it just 'feels' 'less' dimensional when expressed as a slice :)
@@simonwahlen7150 so you think the universe is a sphere? Yet infinite? Can spheres be infinite and how? Or do you think there’s an edge to the universe? I’m just highly curious about this lol
@@emsa5034 Due to the speed of light and relativity when we look at something farther away we also look at it earlier in time. The edge of the observable universe 14~ish billion light years away is also 14 billions of years earlier in time than we are. The edge of the universe is so "young" that is still so hot that it is a wall of plasma our telescopes can't se through.
Since all points on a spheres surface are equaly far from the middle everything that is 14 billions of light years away from us forms a sphere that is 14 billion light yeras in diameter.
I don't know if the entirety of the universe is finite or not I haven't seen theories about that. I think the leading theories about our 3-dimensions not curving into each other and the universe having zero energy when negativ energy from gravity cancels out other energy allows for an infinite universe but I am not sure.
Madam Sklodowska-Curie could speak firstly: in Polish, secondly in French.
Thanks!
Dark star is way cooler than black hole
Agree. Black hole is a bonus hole
That's crazy; I've literally heard people referring to their b-holes, as dark stars, as long as I can remember.
Could these moduli and axioms be candidates for dark energy and dark matter?
This was such a beautiful video on multiple levels. I added it to the playlists I felt they could be perceived in the most meaningful ways. Thank you for Sharing this Wisdom!