exactly, the world has no closure. It is forever changing, but just out of the realm of our perception. Our mass suffering from humanity is mostly extracted by this need for closure and to feel things make sense. It's not that things are not interconnected but we must take into the account we only can observe a sliver of what is truly occurring in this reality. We may never know when the times comes that we are exposed to something within the moment that could explain the depth of this reality to you, but if your always looking for models and closure we may never be exposed to this moment. “You must be shapeless, formless, like water. When you pour water in a cup, it becomes the cup. When you pour water in a bottle, it becomes the bottle. When you pour water in a teapot, it becomes the teapot. Water can drip and it can crash. Become like water my friend.” -ole Bruce Lee
Messrs. Vafa and Fridman, "an intuition," very interesting, and this vid is the highest utility of 6 of my minutes today, watched this during my lunch break today, thank you both
Consider every observer as a reality sampler and reality generator, with a theoretical maximum sampling frequency. In order to move, observers have to sacrifice time slots for which no reality updates occur. Thus time will progress in different speed for the observers depending on their movement. And the maximum theoretical sampling frequency would explain the constant speed of light - it's the clock frequency of the universe
you are incorrect to think that time is relative (at least according to einstein) - more like time is relative as light is - light is essentially the constant of time (at least for any given frame of reference) but einstein is saying that light is not relative right? since it is consistent to any speed, position, frame of reference or relationship between anything that is not singular with anything else i think that light is itself the medium (the ether) and why it appears with some odd properties
So space expanding effects light photons but not actual mass or matter because of mass. This is very tricky stuff but somethings missing here and I will figure it out.
I feel as if the world has no closure. It is forever changing, but just out of the realm of our perception. Our mass suffering from humanity is mostly extracted by this need for closure and to feel things make sense. It's not that things are not interconnected but we must take into the account we only can observe a sliver of what is truly occurring in this reality. We may never know when the times comes that we are exposed to something within the moment that could explain the depth of this reality to you, but if your always looking for models and closure we may never be exposed to this moment. “You must be shapeless, formless, like water. When you pour water in a cup, it becomes the cup. When you pour water in a bottle, it becomes the bottle. When you pour water in a teapot, it becomes the teapot. Water can drip and it can crash. Become like water my friend.” -ole Bruce Lee
Never could understand how the speed of light could be the same for everyone. What if you are traveling in a space station away from earth at 51% C and launch a ship from it going the same direction at 51% C. Wouldnt that ship break the speed of light relative to earth?
Relativity tells us that we can't aggregate speeds like that. In your example, the second ship would only be travelling at 0.51c in your reference frame - not all.
Daring statement retreated by Einstein himself with the General Relativity, where the second postulate disappear and, by the way, the speed of light is not constant also in special relativity for accelerated frames.
why do physicists smile so joyfully when they explain the almost unexplainable? i think they feel that they have found the door with the key to everything; all understanding. door. no key. but the door implies there is something else. the smile is genuine excitement, that physics is on the cusp of figuring out ‘everything’ 😷
Space is infinite because of inflation and the acceleration of dark energy rn. The universe is cyclic and there are photons that will travel into infinity without hitting anything, after the heat death of the universe at the very end those photons coalesce and travel into the next aeon via a Big Bang and we can observe the energy from it via gravitational waves and feedback, search roger penrose cyclic universe, man is 89 and spot on
“Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No matter how fast light travels, it finds the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it.”
Didn't like what he said about agreeing on what time it is. Yes, it's always 5 o'clock somewhere. But you could get everyone to agree that now is now. Just like here is here. And if you point to a distant object and say there is there, everyone would agree there is there and not here. It's just less obvious that there is also then, not now, from here.
So cool how at the sametime many teams of humans totally unconnected can invent same things or solve the same problems. Newton understood this very well knew when to move to the next problem ready to be solved. The super athiest like Hawkins will beat heads against the wall on unlovable problems but never creative enough to spot this "it factor " of merging readiness. Einstein just heat the pack to this. It was alot of others hovering on this he just the right detail on first.
Michelson-Morley experiment result did not abolish the ether, rather it showed that the earth is at rest. Is there anything that can refute this? Not to my knowledge.
You don't experience G force from travelling fast. It's only the acceleration that does it, so as long as you make the acceleration slow enough, there shouldn't be a problem.
@@ronniemaclaine5234 massless particles reach the speed of light instantly, they don't accelerate, but you correct anything with mass couldn't actually reach the speed of light. But you could get close in a year at 1G
Could the temperature of space effect the speed of light? Light photons are warm in nature correct? If that is the case then would the temp of space slow the light down and actually stretch the light into different spectrums the farther it travels while the light was maintaining its speed. And not an expanding universe but the temp of the universe itself. So will a cold universe slow light down and stretch it over time space? I'm asking because the expanding universe theory isn't quite making sense although I understand what's being said.
This is why Einstein did not win the Nobel prize for his theory of relativity. No one could even test all of its predictions for years. The photo electric effect could be verified. The theory of relativity was just too much to ask the scientific community to accept right away.
Well there lies the problem..the Ether does exist..Tesla proved it.!! You should have Theoria Apophasis your fellow RUclipsr..I'd say you'd find His finding and experiments on POINT
Why do these videos always draw the pseudoscientific crowd. Let me guess, Einstein was the wrong and evil "mainstresm science" guy and Tesla was the "true genius shunned away by the mainstream science!".
This dude just taught ya 2 semesters of physics and ya first circuit theory class of a couple of lectures, in a matter of 5 minutes...wonder why he works at Harvard hahahahahha
At this point, I may have seen the majority of the episode just from these clips
"How powerful is the Darkness that Light must flee at such speed." -- some poet
...yet to swallow it must be regarded as far too much greed
I clicked with a speed little below the speed of light
"Only a Sith deals in absolutes."
exactly, the world has no closure. It is forever changing, but just out of the realm of our perception. Our mass suffering from humanity is mostly extracted by this need for closure and to feel things make sense. It's not that things are not interconnected but we must take into the account we only can observe a sliver of what is truly occurring in this reality. We may never know when the times comes that we are exposed to something within the moment that could explain the depth of this reality to you, but if your always looking for models and closure we may never be exposed to this moment. “You must be shapeless, formless, like water. When you pour water in a cup, it becomes the cup. When you pour water in a bottle, it becomes the bottle. When you pour water in a teapot, it becomes the teapot. Water can drip and it can crash. Become like water my friend.” -ole Bruce Lee
That’s a good one :)
Realizing that time is relative to the speed of light is like realizing the earth orbits the sun and not vice versa
Indeed. It’s a shame he didn’t mention that Einstein realised that it is time that changes.
My intuition tells me that when man finally travels at the speed of light we will find out that all it does is save time...
Time dilation has already been proven by taking atomic clocks on fast aero planes.
hahahhahahahha
@@DKFX1 every gps satellite uses relativity to adjust their clocks because time passes different for them.
Messrs. Vafa and Fridman,
"an intuition," very interesting, and this vid is the highest utility of 6 of my minutes today, watched this during my lunch break today, thank you both
about cultivating intuition
Speed of light , is the speed in wich reality is rendered, that is why it cannot be surpassed.
You need a better cpu
GTA on a bad pc. I now understand.
@@inthefade
How do you explain the big bang, inflation and the expansion of the universe. All happen at the speed faster than light in a vacuum.
So essentially it’s the max FPS of the super computer running the simulation we call life? Makes sense
@@kundakaps Universe can expand faster than light but nothing in the universe can travel through it faster than light cause of inertia
Consider every observer as a reality sampler and reality generator, with a theoretical maximum sampling frequency.
In order to move, observers have to sacrifice time slots for which no reality updates occur.
Thus time will progress in different speed for the observers depending on their movement.
And the maximum theoretical sampling frequency would explain the constant speed of light - it's the clock frequency of the universe
Any chance you could interview Squirtwalk Fava next?
you are incorrect to think that time is relative (at least according to einstein) - more like time is relative as light is - light is essentially the constant of time (at least for any given frame of reference) but einstein is saying that light is not relative right? since it is consistent to any speed, position, frame of reference or relationship between anything that is not singular with anything else
i think that light is itself the medium (the ether) and why it appears with some odd properties
So space expanding effects light photons but not actual mass or matter because of mass. This is very tricky stuff but somethings missing here and I will figure it out.
Light is about having a full bodied flavor with half the calories.
Tastes great, Less filling.
I feel as if the world has no closure. It is forever changing, but just out of the realm of our perception. Our mass suffering from humanity is mostly extracted by this need for closure and to feel things make sense. It's not that things are not interconnected but we must take into the account we only can observe a sliver of what is truly occurring in this reality. We may never know when the times comes that we are exposed to something within the moment that could explain the depth of this reality to you, but if your always looking for models and closure we may never be exposed to this moment. “You must be shapeless, formless, like water. When you pour water in a cup, it becomes the cup. When you pour water in a bottle, it becomes the bottle. When you pour water in a teapot, it becomes the teapot. Water can drip and it can crash. Become like water my friend.” -ole Bruce Lee
Never could understand how the speed of light could be the same for everyone.
What if you are traveling in a space station away from earth at 51% C and launch a ship from it going the same direction at 51% C. Wouldnt that ship break the speed of light relative to earth?
No
Relativity tells us that we can't aggregate speeds like that.
In your example, the second ship would only be travelling at 0.51c in your reference frame - not all.
Daring statement retreated by Einstein himself with the General Relativity, where the second postulate disappear and, by the way, the speed of light is not constant also in special relativity for accelerated frames.
why do physicists smile so joyfully when they explain the almost unexplainable?
i think they feel that they have found the door with the key to everything; all understanding.
door. no key. but the door implies there is something else. the smile is genuine excitement, that physics is on the cusp of figuring out ‘everything’ 😷
#FollowTheMath
Space-time is like "oobleck"? The faster you go near c, delta v and entropy approaches 0? idk
Could space be infinite because if it was finite the light would hit the end and shine back like the light of a room? Thoughts?
Maybe it does shine back, as the stars.
Space is infinite because of inflation and the acceleration of dark energy rn. The universe is cyclic and there are photons that will travel into infinity without hitting anything, after the heat death of the universe at the very end those photons coalesce and travel into the next aeon via a Big Bang and we can observe the energy from it via gravitational waves and feedback, search roger penrose cyclic universe, man is 89 and spot on
Magnetic North is the slow hand of time.
Maxwell true genius
“Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No matter how fast light travels, it finds the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it.”
What a dumb quote
This made a lil too much sense to me
Didn't like what he said about agreeing on what time it is. Yes, it's always 5 o'clock somewhere. But you could get everyone to agree that now is now. Just like here is here. And if you point to a distant object and say there is there, everyone would agree there is there and not here. It's just less obvious that there is also then, not now, from here.
So cool how at the sametime many teams of humans totally unconnected can invent same things or solve the same problems.
Newton understood this very well knew when to move to the next problem ready to be solved. The super athiest like Hawkins will beat heads against the wall on unlovable problems but never creative enough to spot this "it factor " of merging readiness.
Einstein just heat the pack to this. It was alot of others hovering on this he just the right detail on first.
I just watched a clip of someone talking about how monkeys fk frogs like a fleshlight, and now I'm here...... all hale the RUclips algorithm 🙏
Lex > JRE
Lex is the Academic JRE. The JRE without the DMT.
Not sure why everyone feels the need to compare. Both are great in their own ways
The visual spectrum of the electromagnetic field is the speed of light.
Michelson-Morley experiment result did not abolish the ether, rather it showed that the earth is at rest.
Is there anything that can refute this?
Not to my knowledge.
We would never be able to go at speed of light. The gs alone would kill us
You don't experience G force from travelling fast. It's only the acceleration that does it, so as long as you make the acceleration slow enough, there shouldn't be a problem.
You can reach the speed of a light at 1G in about a year.
@@jmac8470
Only if you are massless
@@ronniemaclaine5234 massless particles reach the speed of light instantly, they don't accelerate, but you correct anything with mass couldn't actually reach the speed of light. But you could get close in a year at 1G
Could the temperature of space effect the speed of light? Light photons are warm in nature correct? If that is the case then would the temp of space slow the light down and actually stretch the light into different spectrums the farther it travels while the light was maintaining its speed. And not an expanding universe but the temp of the universe itself. So will a cold universe slow light down and stretch it over time space? I'm asking because the expanding universe theory isn't quite making sense although I understand what's being said.
Damn u might be on to something good job for thinking outside the box
This is why Einstein did not win the Nobel prize for his theory of relativity. No one could even test all of its predictions for years. The photo electric effect could be verified. The theory of relativity was just too much to ask the scientific community to accept right away.
What about a cumrun but it's an Olympic 5km race and the first to bust wins.
Also I'm gay
Ok but one athlete is on earth and the other is flying on a spaceship at the speed of light.
Hell yeah dude, but wrong podcast
or you and the boys go door to door in a one block radius to see who can collect the most, bro let's go for a...etc.
Well there lies the problem..the Ether does exist..Tesla proved it.!! You should have Theoria Apophasis your fellow RUclipsr..I'd say you'd find His finding and experiments on POINT
Why do these videos always draw the pseudoscientific crowd. Let me guess, Einstein was the wrong and evil "mainstresm science" guy and Tesla was the "true genius shunned away by the mainstream science!".
Yeah well it's called the Higgs field
This dude just taught ya 2 semesters of physics and ya first circuit theory class of a couple of lectures, in a matter of 5 minutes...wonder why he works at Harvard hahahahahha