23rd reuse of this booster and first failed landing in over 100 launches lmao, I don’t think there’s any real negative statement to be made about this failure
Technically it did land successfully, but it was the booster's 23rd landing so it has a distinguished career behind it. The amount of flames after landing seemed to be ,ore than usual. It's delayed launch of the next Starlink mission.
Inspiration4 and Axiom-1 were both launched by this booster, on her third and fifth flights respectively, both historic firsts for human spaceflight. It's unusual that a single rocket stage gets to do more than one of these. On top of that, B1062 also launched Nilesat-301, a mission previously assigned to an expendable booster, along with 20 other missions. She was a good ship.
The surprising thing is something like this not happening sooner. This will just make them even more reliable. And to my knowledge, STILL the only company or country in the world that lands orbital class boosters at all, let alone on the regular.
It was hard to see through the smoke but to me it seemed like B1062 landed at a slight angle. One of the landing legs might have gotten too much strain. I couldn't believe it when B1062 started tipping over. NO....!!!! But I hope ASOG wasn't damaged too badly, there are only two drone ships in the Atlantic and hopefully this incident doesn't delay Polaris Dawn any further.
that’s absolutely incredible how spacex was able to reuse that booster 23 times! the most important thing is that the payload is safely in orbit. Spacex has a ton of new and better boosters in the fleet that can easily replace B1062.
In truth, it is a standard ‘landing’ for all of the other rocket launchers out there. And has been since the dawn of rockets. SpaceX has us spoiled for the future !
Truth be told, this event has been itching in the deep recesses of my consciousness, every time a F9 comes in for a landing, we knew it was bound to happen, SX was tempting the fates as they stretched the number of landings for each one in the fleet. I’m sorry it happened to 1062… I was hoping for 25. Sad, but still hope for a 25th soon.
Well, B1061 is already at 22 flights, and B1067 at 21, so they're not far behind. Both just launched a few weeks ago though, so it'll be another few months before they reach 23.
Looks like the actual engine failed to extinguish like it usually does once it lands, wonder if the heat/flames weakened the leg to the point of collapse
Go back and rewatch the entire flight 1062 was doomed at lunch. The plume did not look right at launch or during ascent after reentry burn, there’s indications of a fire in the engine compartment as it descends when it was passing through the sonic barrier the flames briefly go away, but upon reignition of the center engine, the plume does not look correct there again I suspect a propellant leak on one of the engines of stage one from the very beginning of launch.
We’ve seen a lot of uncoordinated landing leg deployments in the past. I think I can see that one of the legs was slow and didn’t lock when the rocket touches down here. I think this was probably a possible accident waiting to happen. They need to make the leg deployment system more robust.
This counts as nothing compared to how far ahead SpaceX has gone when it comes to space rocket business. They have a record that won't be easily broken at least for the next 20 years.
Cause of failure: TEA-TEB injector pipe progressive heat damage leading to deformities in the valve and a leak causing a fire and landing leg thermal damage leading to severe crack expansion and leg collapse at least that’s what I think!
![Quando Rondo - Grow Up [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8zFnCg3BO4Q/mqdefault.jpg)
now watch all the news media coming like a wave on spacex saying to everyone spacex failed the launch 😂😂😂
Maybe it’s just because it’s old and worn out: 23 launches is nothing to scoff at
Yeah, looks like a leg failure.
Wait that booster has 23 launches
@@chroniclegames5677 yes
@@chroniclegames5677 yes that booster has gone into space 23 times
that's INSANE, 23!
Well, at least they got her off the pad and satellites and orbit. They’re still ahead of the game.
23 times
Yeah this booster was reused 23 times
23rd reuse of this booster and first failed landing in over 100 launches lmao, I don’t think there’s any real negative statement to be made about this failure
@@GrapeFlavoredAntifreeze exactly, im sure the money they saved from reusing it this often could buy multiple new falcon 9s
and here I was thinking after 1/267 failures "SECOND PLACE LOSERS"
RIP B1062
Oh man that's a failure we haven't seen for a while
The fact that this failure is so unexpected is very telling of how reliable they have been with landings.
Yeah, this was its 23rd flight
@@kukuc96 Agreed. Each successful landing still amazes me
@@Nuke-MarsX remarkable when no one else has even flown a booster twice
the last landing accident was in 2021
Technically it did land successfully, but it was the booster's 23rd landing so it has a distinguished career behind it. The amount of flames after landing seemed to be ,ore than usual. It's delayed launch of the next Starlink mission.
@@ukar69 a leg failed and crippled. Looks like the engines hit the ground to hard because of this and the booster fell over because of the leg
Inspiration4 and Axiom-1 were both launched by this booster, on her third and fifth flights respectively, both historic firsts for human spaceflight. It's unusual that a single rocket stage gets to do more than one of these. On top of that, B1062 also launched Nilesat-301, a mission previously assigned to an expendable booster, along with 20 other missions.
She was a good ship.
The surprising thing is something like this not happening sooner. This will just make them even more reliable. And to my knowledge, STILL the only company or country in the world that lands orbital class boosters at all, let alone on the regular.
To learn is to try, if you don't try, you will never learn. Simples.
It "happened sooner" a bunch of times. 22 landings sooner.
23 launches and successful landings is a remarkable feat.
It was hard to see through the smoke but to me it seemed like B1062 landed at a slight angle. One of the landing legs might have gotten too much strain. I couldn't believe it when B1062 started tipping over. NO....!!!! But I hope ASOG wasn't damaged too badly, there are only two drone ships in the Atlantic and hopefully this incident doesn't delay Polaris Dawn any further.
Failure is an option when you are a pioneer! 😉
I’m sorry sir but you have died of dysentery
Bro was just sleepy and wanted to take a nap 😴
Yo its LSF
Bro got that arthritis
The first stage of Falcon 9 landing is a robot or a person who controls it.
“Hello sir I’m calling about the extended warranty on your booster”
LOL
NASA is self-insured. Don't know about Spacex ..probly the same..
😂👍
@@JohnLagerling - NASA self-insures. Probly Spacex too .
That back leg looked wobbly at 0:09. Definitely seems like it hit just a smidge hard.
I saw impact at 11 kph, it dropped to 8 and then fell over.
May it rest in pieces.
Exactly. Hard landing
Adds new meaning to the phrase, "Break a leg!". But 23 flights is impressive. Are there any other boosters with more?
that’s absolutely incredible how spacex was able to reuse that booster 23 times! the most important thing is that the payload is safely in orbit. Spacex has a ton of new and better boosters in the fleet that can easily replace B1062.
Ah RIP B1062! 23 flights! Is that a record?
Yes it is!
@@chrismantonuk it beat b1058 with 19 reflights
Keep up the great work, Space X team. These things will happen. Keep moving forward
Booster realized that was 23 and took retirement
it touched down pretty hard this time, 10km/h
one leg couldn't take it and break, and the engines slammed to the ground, fuel spraying everywhere
I think the engine failed to shut down promptly.
Good booster, RIP.
Another great opportunity to learn more and go even further. Go SpaceX, Go Falcon
Ein bisschen Schwund ist immer..🤷 Egal..Nichts passiert. Eine Neue aus dem Schrank geholt 🤷👍Weiter geht's.👍👍
In truth, it is a standard ‘landing’ for all of the other rocket launchers out there. And has been since the dawn of rockets.
SpaceX has us spoiled for the future !
We’ve gotten to the point where we’ve seen so many falcon 9 landings that the failed one is more interesting 😭
The way the engines had a small fire, I think they impacted hard.
Truth be told, this event has been itching in the deep recesses of my consciousness, every time a F9 comes in for a landing, we knew it was bound to happen, SX was tempting the fates as they stretched the number of landings for each one in the fleet.
I’m sorry it happened to 1062…
I was hoping for 25.
Sad, but still hope for a 25th soon.
Well, B1061 is already at 22 flights, and B1067 at 21, so they're not far behind. Both just launched a few weeks ago though, so it'll be another few months before they reach 23.
So, 20 is the number. Still absolutely impressive.
20 is the number to change the legs.
I’d say SpaceX pushed that booster to its limits.
Ugh no good. At least it's just a landing gear failure.
It could also be caused by the engine losing thrust at the critical moment causing a hard landing and breaking the leg
@@listerdave1240 or it did shutdow to early
Haven't seen that in a while. How many flights on that rocket?
23rd
Looks like the actual engine failed to extinguish like it usually does once it lands, wonder if the heat/flames weakened the leg to the point of collapse
It’s just a rapid unscheduled disassembly 😊
Definitely looks like the engine struggled to start up or at least throttle correctly. Hard landing for sure.
what is that lighting
It’s crazy that they are testing these landings in the ocean and at night.
Not testing, they have done 100s this is normal operations now.
@@TheLaunchPad Yea I was going to edit this after I sent but was too lazy to go and find it lol
Looked more like a leg fail than a landing fail. The landing itself was great.
atleast it landed for like half a second, right?
Go back and rewatch the entire flight 1062 was doomed at lunch. The plume did not look right at launch or during ascent after reentry burn, there’s indications of a fire in the engine compartment as it descends when it was passing through the sonic barrier the flames briefly go away, but upon reignition of the center engine, the plume does not look correct there again I suspect a propellant leak on one of the engines of stage one from the very beginning of launch.
Launch was successful,
Retrieval was an icing of the cake, but its not.
What goes up must come down.
We’ve seen a lot of uncoordinated landing leg deployments in the past. I think I can see that one of the legs was slow and didn’t lock when the rocket touches down here. I think this was probably a possible accident waiting to happen. They need to make the leg deployment system more robust.
drive until the wheels fall off
Where is the helium leak on Polaris Dawn? First stage, second, or Dragon?
none of these, it was on the launch complex
*Three point landing vs Three landing leg landing.*
Insufficient thrust or landing leg overstressed or both
How late is too late for landing leg deployment, looks like a leg failed to lock on.
Engine shutdown seemed to be problematic
This counts as nothing compared to how far ahead SpaceX has gone when it comes to space rocket business.
They have a record that won't be easily broken at least for the next 20 years.
💫 0:12
rest in peace brother 😋
Oh that's make me sad
Wasn't it 1062? I've seen it named as both 1062 and 1063?
fixed, 6 hours sleep in 72 hours will get ya mixing numbers,
@@TheLaunchPad Thanks for that, wasn't trying to be a pain! Sad day today 😞
@@TheLaunchPadWhoa get some rest dude! We don't want ya to tip over like B1062...
It was B1062.
My guess is how old are the landing legs?
This was the 23rd launch of this booster
and of course i didn't get to see this on stream
What a shame! 😮
Chit happens. It was going to be scrapped soon.
Too rough sea?
Falcon boosters showing their age
There is Simone Biles, and then there is me. She nails the landing, I get nailed by the landing. This booster is me.
Maybe he shouldn't have used a temporary pad in the ocean to land on.
Polaris Dawn will be delayed indefinitely, FAA is requiring an investigation
FAA is gonna cry again
Seems that the engine didn't shutdown after landing but reignited causing landing leg failure ... valve or something simple. Needs investigation.
Hard landing
Back landing leg pole snapped if anyone else saw!!?
Cause of failure: TEA-TEB injector pipe progressive heat damage leading to deformities in the valve and a leak causing a fire and landing leg thermal damage leading to severe crack expansion and leg collapse at least that’s what I think!
RIP rocket
Looks like a landing leg failed and the FAA wants to ground SpaceX launches? Yeah, right.
they cut away so quickly
Failure to videoing the booster landing in Florida 🥺 0:01
Haa cut away!!😂
It’s an old booster. Its third leg couldn’t get hard anymore.
RIP spaceX 💀
Oops !
Well it did land in theory
NOOOO RIP
NOT B1062 😭😭😭😭
Looks like a landing leg failure.
Send it to COPART
Well since the FAA grounded space X again crew 9 wont launch anytime soon so looks like boeing paid off the FAA so they can murder those 2 astronauts
Ooh man
Ouch
good bye b1062
Whuuups...
oh no~~~~~
What
It is landing on a ship in the ocean which is rocking so it's not all it's fault
rip 1058
RIP
Opps!
we really gotta thanks Elon for making failures such a rare event ...
Too many 🍻
Heyyyy wha happen 😮
Take a bow
OOPS!
No nooo😢😢.....
Oops