LANDING FAIL - SpaceX Falcon 9 B1062
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 сен 2024
- LANDING FAIL - SpaceX Falcon 9 B1062
#SpaceX #Falcon9 #RocketFail
Watch as SpaceX attempts to land Falcon 9 B1062 for the 23rd and sadly final time as during recovery it fell over and was destroyed.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Want to support what I do?
Consider becoming a TLP Member on Patreon or RUclips!
/ thelaunchpad
/ thelaunchpad
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
CONNECT WITH US:
Discord - / discord
Twitter - / tlpn_official
Shop - www.thelaunchp...
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
VIDEO SOURCES:
SpaceX
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
GIVEAWAY RULES:
No Purchase Necessary. Purchase/donation does not enhance chance of winning. Void where prohibited or restricted by law. Valid only during the live broadcast.
now watch all the news media coming like a wave on spacex saying to everyone spacex failed the launch 😂😂😂
Maybe it’s just because it’s old and worn out: 23 launches is nothing to scoff at
Yeah, looks like a leg failure.
Wait that booster has 23 launches
@@chroniclegames5677 yes
@@chroniclegames5677 yes that booster has gone into space 23 times
that's INSANE, 23!
RIP B1062
Well, at least they got her off the pad and satellites and orbit. They’re still ahead of the game.
23 times
Yeah this booster was reused 23 times
23rd reuse of this booster and first failed landing in over 100 launches lmao, I don’t think there’s any real negative statement to be made about this failure
@@GrapeFlavoredAntifreeze exactly, im sure the money they saved from reusing it this often could buy multiple new falcon 9s
and here I was thinking after 1/267 failures "SECOND PLACE LOSERS"
Oh man that's a failure we haven't seen for a while
The fact that this failure is so unexpected is very telling of how reliable they have been with landings.
Yeah, this was its 23rd flight
@@kukuc96 Agreed. Each successful landing still amazes me
@@Nuke-MarsX remarkable when no one else has even flown a booster twice
the last landing accident was in 2021
The surprising thing is something like this not happening sooner. This will just make them even more reliable. And to my knowledge, STILL the only company or country in the world that lands orbital class boosters at all, let alone on the regular.
To learn is to try, if you don't try, you will never learn. Simples.
It "happened sooner" a bunch of times. 22 landings sooner.
23 launches and successful landings is a remarkable feat.
Technically it did land successfully, but it was the booster's 23rd landing so it has a distinguished career behind it. The amount of flames after landing seemed to be ,ore than usual. It's delayed launch of the next Starlink mission.
@@ukar69 a leg failed and crippled. Looks like the engines hit the ground to hard because of this and the booster fell over because of the leg
“Hello sir I’m calling about the extended warranty on your booster”
LOL
NASA is self-insured. Don't know about Spacex ..probly the same..
😂👍
@@JohnLagerling - NASA self-insures. Probly Spacex too .
Adds new meaning to the phrase, "Break a leg!". But 23 flights is impressive. Are there any other boosters with more?
I saw impact at 11 kph, it dropped to 8 and then fell over.
May it rest in pieces.
Exactly. Hard landing
Failure is an option when you are a pioneer! 😉
I’m sorry sir but you have died of dysentery
it touched down pretty hard this time, 10km/h
one leg couldn't take it and break, and the engines slammed to the ground, fuel spraying everywhere
That back leg looked wobbly at 0:09. Definitely seems like it hit just a smidge hard.
that’s absolutely incredible how spacex was able to reuse that booster 23 times! the most important thing is that the payload is safely in orbit. Spacex has a ton of new and better boosters in the fleet that can easily replace B1062.
Booster realized that was 23 and took retirement
Keep up the great work, Space X team. These things will happen. Keep moving forward
Truth be told, this event has been itching in the deep recesses of my consciousness, every time a F9 comes in for a landing, we knew it was bound to happen, SX was tempting the fates as they stretched the number of landings for each one in the fleet.
I’m sorry it happened to 1062…
I was hoping for 25.
Sad, but still hope for a 25th soon.
Well, B1061 is already at 22 flights, and B1067 at 21, so they're not far behind. Both just launched a few weeks ago though, so it'll be another few months before they reach 23.
Ein bisschen Schwund ist immer..🤷 Egal..Nichts passiert. Eine Neue aus dem Schrank geholt 🤷👍Weiter geht's.👍👍
Another great opportunity to learn more and go even further. Go SpaceX, Go Falcon
In truth, it is a standard ‘landing’ for all of the other rocket launchers out there. And has been since the dawn of rockets.
SpaceX has us spoiled for the future !
Ugh no good. At least it's just a landing gear failure.
It could also be caused by the engine losing thrust at the critical moment causing a hard landing and breaking the leg
@@listerdave1240 or it did shutdow to early
Go back and rewatch the entire flight 1062 was doomed at lunch. The plume did not look right at launch or during ascent after reentry burn, there’s indications of a fire in the engine compartment as it descends when it was passing through the sonic barrier the flames briefly go away, but upon reignition of the center engine, the plume does not look correct there again I suspect a propellant leak on one of the engines of stage one from the very beginning of launch.
Looks like the actual engine failed to extinguish like it usually does once it lands, wonder if the heat/flames weakened the leg to the point of collapse
I’d say SpaceX pushed that booster to its limits.
It’s just a rapid unscheduled disassembly 😊
So, 20 is the number. Still absolutely impressive.
20 is the number to change the legs.
Haven't seen that in a while. How many flights on that rocket?
23rd
The way the engines had a small fire, I think they impacted hard.
Definitely looks like the engine struggled to start up or at least throttle correctly. Hard landing for sure.
*Three point landing vs Three landing leg landing.*
What goes up must come down.
We’ve seen a lot of uncoordinated landing leg deployments in the past. I think I can see that one of the legs was slow and didn’t lock when the rocket touches down here. I think this was probably a possible accident waiting to happen. They need to make the leg deployment system more robust.
atleast it landed for like half a second, right?
It’s crazy that they are testing these landings in the ocean and at night.
Not testing, they have done 100s this is normal operations now.
@@TheLaunchPad Yea I was going to edit this after I sent but was too lazy to go and find it lol
what is that lighting
Looked more like a leg fail than a landing fail. The landing itself was great.
Haa cut away!!😂
Cause of failure: TEA-TEB injector pipe progressive heat damage leading to deformities in the valve and a leak causing a fire and landing leg thermal damage leading to severe crack expansion and leg collapse at least that’s what I think!
Seems that the engine didn't shutdown after landing but reignited causing landing leg failure ... valve or something simple. Needs investigation.
This counts as nothing compared to how far ahead SpaceX has gone when it comes to space rocket business.
They have a record that won't be easily broken at least for the next 20 years.
How late is too late for landing leg deployment, looks like a leg failed to lock on.
Where is the helium leak on Polaris Dawn? First stage, second, or Dragon?
none of these, it was on the launch complex
Insufficient thrust or landing leg overstressed or both
Back landing leg pole snapped if anyone else saw!!?
RIP
Hard landing
Oops !
they cut away so quickly
Rip
OOPS!
Wasn't it 1062? I've seen it named as both 1062 and 1063?
fixed, 6 hours sleep in 72 hours will get ya mixing numbers,
@@TheLaunchPad Thanks for that, wasn't trying to be a pain! Sad day today 😞
@@TheLaunchPadWhoa get some rest dude! We don't want ya to tip over like B1062...
It was B1062.
Chit happens. It was going to be scrapped soon.
Looks like a landing leg failed and the FAA wants to ground SpaceX launches? Yeah, right.
Ooh man
NOOOO RIP
Opps!
oh no~~~~~
Polaris Dawn will be delayed indefinitely, FAA is requiring an investigation
Well since the FAA grounded space X again crew 9 wont launch anytime soon so looks like boeing paid off the FAA so they can murder those 2 astronauts
rip 1058
FAA is gonna cry again
What
Send it to COPART
good bye b1062
Well it did land in theory
Looks like a landing leg failure.
Heyyyy wha happen 😮
Take a bow
😮
That’s what the fourth failed landing unintended. I look forward to seeing the post flight review on this accident and I wonder if this is going to effect starship 5 launch certification by the faa.
It wont
it wont as starship is a completely other spaceship that has almost nothing in common with the falcon 9.
It will 100% not affect anything to do with Starship. It won’t even affect anything to do with Falcon 9.
we really gotta thanks Elon for making failures such a rare event ...
🎉
What happened to SpaceX? Falcon 9 has failed twice this year...
Eh, booster landings were always a "this really saves a lot of time and money" thing, but were never, strictly speaking, an absolute requirement. And bear in mind, this booster was tied for the record at a whopping 22 previous successful landings. The 2nd stage incident in July was indeed a failure (SpaceX's first in years), but with reused boosters they are constantly pushing into uncharted territory. The occasional loss like this is tragic, but also enormously instructive, telling them what the likely failures are and what to watch for.
They have another booster that will likewise launch for the 23rd time in the next month or so, and you can bet that in the meantime they'll be going over its landing legs with a fine-toothed comb.
What happened to Boeing? They failed twice today.
Might cause some delays from this 😮
This will be a wait and see game. After the Starliner debacle nasa is taking with a strong magnifying glass regarding future potential space debris from derelict spacecraft and so forth. Also with all the protective wetlands around boca chica (sp?) there is going to be new opposition to 1st stages returning to launch pad as designed. We’ll just have to wait and see.
Must have used made in China parts
SpaceX is starting to be much less transparent, why did they cut the feed? Failure IS an option remember. Why are we hiding all of a sudden
Pretty sure its automated. Thats the usual time between camera cuts. They confirmed it on twitter and might share additional videos.
@@Cobson_GamingYTwatching the last successful landing, it seems like it is shown for much longer. Will have to put a stopwatch on it when im bored 😂.
I think you are right. 12 secs around
They might stop the feed if they expect a bright flash that might cause an epileptic reaction in some people.
Probably they did not cut the feed but it got cut off because stage 1 exploded.
Not surprising and still want to play rescue 😂
that booster has already flown to space 23 times
I’m third
Interesting. One SpaceX reusable, non-human occupied, rocket fails on its 35th mission to land on a floating dock in the ocean and ALL HELL, or should I say ALL BOEING, breaks out. It's like the proverbial straw in your (SpaceX) eye versus the rafter in your rival's (Boeing) eye. Or it's like the proverbial, "Let's make a MOUNTAIN out of this SpaceX mole hill." It's all about, "Let's take the focus off of Boeing's Abject, Stunning Failure by focusing on the most trial failure imaginable. Or let's take the focus off of the horrible, supposedly accidental deaths, of Boeing whistle-blowers. It's a Mad Mad World ... we should be focusing on SpaceX's incredible achievements in spite of it being constantly dissed by the USA Federal and local State governments through their multitude of agencies bent on promoting the self-serving wishes of bad actors sitting in the House of Representatives and the Senate ... let alone the bad actors at the State level.
ppl STILL believe in space lmfaooooooooooo God laughing hard AF right now
Lol.. let's go firmament let's go!! Like you really leaving the firmament. God not having it read the Bible
it is not safe to get life on board.
Why does it matter if the part with no humans on it doesn’t successfully land on its 23rd launch
23th landing ?!?!? It's practically a 20year old dog. It wants to just die and rest in peace. SpaceX is committing elderly abuse with these old boosters. Reminds me of the old coot Joe.
Bro what 💀
Kinda reflects Musk..... becoming more and more a fail.
Oh no the first time in 267 launches the part of the rocket that isn’t critical to launch after few minutes didn’t land?
You do realize SpaceX is the only company to ever do something like this right?
F Musky
Actually, it’s looks more like f you. I mean, he’s actually done things to become world famous. You? I doubt you’ll ever get anywhere trolling online and carrying so much irrational hate.
Why
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
bro finally gave up 😂😂 🫡
You did well Booster.
It was hard to see through the smoke but to me it seemed like B1062 landed at a slight angle. One of the landing legs might have gotten too much strain. I couldn't believe it when B1062 started tipping over. NO....!!!! But I hope ASOG wasn't damaged too badly, there are only two drone ships in the Atlantic and hopefully this incident doesn't delay Polaris Dawn any further.
Inspiration4 and Axiom-1 were both launched by this booster, on her third and fifth flights respectively, both historic firsts for human spaceflight. It's unusual that a single rocket stage gets to do more than one of these. On top of that, B1062 also launched Nilesat-301, a mission previously assigned to an expendable booster, along with 20 other missions.
She was a good ship.
Bro was just sleepy and wanted to take a nap 😴
Yo its LSF
Bro got that arthritis
Ah RIP B1062! 23 flights! Is that a record?
Yes it is!
@@chrismantonuk it beat b1058 with 19 reflights
I think the engine failed to shut down promptly.
Good booster, RIP.
Launch was successful,
Retrieval was an icing of the cake, but its not.
Falcon boosters showing their age
My Beloved Elon, don't despair you will get the next one right, just before you do the next one, place God at the helm of everything, make a time and place each night for your private talk with him, and listen to every sound. Love always Jennifer Makuch South Africa
drive until the wheels fall off
It’s an old booster. Its third leg couldn’t get hard anymore.
Maybe he shouldn't have used a temporary pad in the ocean to land on.
It is landing on a ship in the ocean which is rocking so it's not all it's fault
NOT B1062 😭😭😭😭